ML18003B041
| ML18003B041 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinch River |
| Issue date: | 12/15/2017 |
| From: | James Shea Tennessee Valley Authority |
| To: | Office of New Reactors |
| Fetter A | |
| References | |
| TVACLINCHRIVERESP, TVACLINCHRIVERESP.SUBMISSION.4, CRN.P.PART08, CRN.P.PART08.1 | |
| Download: ML18003B041 (19) | |
Text
APPENDIX H-Laboratory Test Results-Groundwater Geochemistry-No Change for Rev. 4 H.1-AMEC Data Evaluation Report H.2-Test America Reports Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H1 of 1 a me
APPENDIX H.1-AMEC Data Evaluation Report-No Change for Rev. 4 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-1 of 18
a me DOCUMENTATION OF TECHNICAL REVIEW SUBCONTRACTOR WORK PRODUCT Project Name: Clinch River SMR Project Project Number:
6468-13-1072 Project Manager: Steve Criscenzo Project Technical Leads: AJ Tice, Carl Tockstein The reports de cribed below have been prepared by the named subcontractor retained in accordance with the AMEC QAPD. The work and repotts have been reviewed by an AMEC technically qualified person. Comment on the work or reports, if any, have been satisfactorily addressed by the subcontractor. The reports are approved in accordance with section QS-7 of AMEC sQAPD REPORTS:
J4584-1 USD Level 2 Report Rev( I) Final Report 14584-2 USD Level 2 Report Final Report 14600-l USD Level 2 Report Rev( I) Final Report 14600-2 USD Level 2 Report Final Report 14625-1 USD Level 2 Report Rev( I) Final Report 14625-2 USD Level 2 Report Final Report 14643-1 USD Level 2 Report Final Report SUBCONTRACTOR: Test America DATE OF ACCEPTANCE: 2/20114 TECHNICAL REVIEWER,
~
Q, ~
Judit u')1~tn:;r <:._
PROJECT TECHNICAL LEAD: ~
2---2-$ _, 1 4-Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-2 of 18 AlTice a me RCN: CRP-1207.1 Page 1 of 17
a me Data Evaluation Narrative - Revision 1 Project: TVA Clinch River SMR Project Project Number: 6468-13-1072 Matrix: Groundwater SDGs: TAL 160-4584-1, 160-4600-1, 160-4625-1, 160-4643-1 Introduction A data quality evaluation (DOE) was performed on the data reported for groundwater samples collected for the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Clinch River SMR project located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee in November 2013. The groundwater samples were collected from observation wells, selected by the Client for chemical analyses, and shipped to the laboratory on November 19-24, 2013 for Cations, Anions, Alkalinity, Ammonia, Nitrate/Nitrite, Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), and Cation/Anion Balance.
The following sections provide summary discussions of the data qualifications for the analytical methods for samples collected. A Level II DQE validation was performed on samples analyzed by the fixed-based laboratory methods reported within these sample delivery groups (SDGs).
A Level II DOE includes a review of the following criteria: sample integrity, holding times, reporting limits, method blanks, laboratory control samples (LCSs), surrogate recoveries (where applicable), matrix spikes/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs), laboratory and field duplicate RPDs, and trip, field, and/or equipment blanks. Data were reviewed using precision and accuracy control limits presented in the laboratory's OAPP.
This Data Evaluation Narrative was revised to correct manganese results reported for well OW-419U. Only Tables 1, 1a, and 2 were revised. This correction did not impact the data quality, and Test America reports are not affected.
DOE data qualifications were applied, if necessary, in accordance with procedures in USEPA guidelines (USEPA, 2004), the method, and professional judgment using the following qualifiers:
B = Estimated quantitation; possibly biased high or false positive based on blank data.
J = Estimated quantitation based on associated QC data.
JQ = Estimated quantitation; value is between the reporting limit and the detection limit.
JH =Estimated quantitation; possibly biased high based on QC data.
JL = Estimated quantitation; possibly biased low based on OC data.
U = Undetected.
UJ = Undetected; the reporting detection limit is considered imprecise.
UL = Undetected; data biased low: the reporting detection limit is higher than indicated.
R = Unusable; The sample results are rejected due to serious deficiencies in meeting the Quality Control criteria.
Deliverables The data package as submitted to AMEC Environment and Infrastructure, Inc. (AMEC), is complete as stipulated under Attachment 6: Observation Well and Water Level Monitoring & Sampling Procedures of the TVA Clinch River SMR Project Work Plan for Geotechnical Services (AMEC, 2013) and the Quality Assurance Project Document (QAPD)(AMEC, 2013) for United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Methods 6020A, 300.0, 310.1, 350.1, 160.1, and SM1030F.
Sample Integrity Samples within these SDGs were submitted to Test America Laboratories (TAL), St. Louis for Cations, Anions, Alkalinity, Ammonia, Nitrate/Nitrite, Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), and Cation/Anion Balance.
SDG#s: TAL - 160-4584-1, 160-4600-1, 160-4625-1, 160-4643-1 4/10/2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-3 of 18 Page 1 of 11 RCN: CRP-1207.1 Page 2 of 17
a me Based on the information provided on the cooler receipt forms, the field samples arrived at the laboratories intact and within temperature requirements. Completed Chain-of-Custody documents and cooler receipt forms are included in the data packages.
Sample Identification These SDGs contain the following groundwater samples:
Sample ID Sample Date Sample ID SDG: 160-4584-1 OW 409-L-AA 11/19/13 OW 101-L-AA OW 409-L-88 11/19/13 OW 101-L-88 OW 409-L-CC 11/19/13 OW 101 -L-CC OW 409-L-DD 11/19/13 OW 101-L-DD OW 409-U-A 11/19/13 OW 101-L-A OW 409-U-8 11/19/13 OW 101-L-8 OW 409-U-C 11/19/13 OW 101-L-C OW 409-U-D 11/19/13 OW 101-L-D OW 423-U-A 11/19/13 OW 423-U-8 11/19/13 OW 423-U-C 11/19/13 OW 423-U-D 11/19/13 SDG: 160-4600-1 OW 415-U-A 11/20/13 OW 418-U-C OW 415-U-B 11/20/13 OW 418-UD OW 415-U-C 11/20/13 OW 419-U-A OW 415-U-D 11/20/13 OW 419-U-B OW 418-U-A 11/20/13 OW 419-U-C OW 418-U-8 11/20/13 OW 419-U-D SDG: 160-4625-1 OW 417-L-A 11/21/13 OW 416-L-C OW 417-L-8 11/21/13 OW 416-L-D OW 417-L-C 11/21/13 OW 401-L-A OW 417-L-D 11/21/13 OW 401-L-8 OW 416-L-A 11/21/13 OW 401-L-C OW 416-L-8 11/21/13 OW 401 -L-D SDG: 160-4643-1 OW 420-L-A 11/22/13 OW 202-L-A OW 420-L-8 11/22/13 OW 202-L-8 OW 420-L-C 11/22/13 OW 202-L-C OW 420-L-D 11/22/13 OW 202-L-D OW 421 -L-A 11/22/13 DUP-1-A OW 421 -L-8 11/22/13 DUP-1 -B OW 421 -L-C 11/22/13 DUP-1-C OW 421-L-D 11/22/13 DUP-1-D Sample Date 11/19/13 11/19/13 11/19/13 11/19/13 11/19/13 11/19/13 11/19/13 11/19/13 11/20/13 11/20/13 11/20/13 11/20/13 11/20/13 11/20/13 11/21/13 11/21/13 11/21/13 11/21/13 11/21/13 11/21/13 11/22/13 11/22/13 11/22/13 11/22/13 11/22/13 11/22/13 11/22/13 11/22/13 The groundwater samples were collected from the Site on November 19-22, 2013. Samples for chemical analysis were selected by the Client and received by TAL on November 20-23, 2013. TAL combined the sample fractions in SDG 160-4643-1 and presented the results as samples OW 420-L, OW 421 -L, OW-202-L and DUP-1.
SDG#s: TAL - 160-4584-1, 160-4600-1, 160-4625-1, 160-4643-1 4/10/2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-4 of 18 Page 2 of 11 RCN: CRP-1207.1 Page 3 of 17
a me Field duplicate samples were collected as presented below:
Parent Sample ID Duplicate Sample ID Parent Sample ID DuPlicate Sample ID OW 101-L-AA OW 101-A OW 420-L-A DUP-1-A OW 101-L-BB OW 101-B OW 420-L-B DUP-1-B OW 101-L-CC OW 101-C OW 420-L-C DUP-1-C OW 101-L-DD ow 101 -D OW 420-L-D DUP-1 -D Only those data criterion that required qualification is presented below.
Cations (Method SW6020A)
The groundwater samples were submitted to TAL for cation analysis by Method SW6020A. The cations analyzed for consisted of the following metals: calcium, iron, magnesium, manganese, potassium, silica, and sodium. The Level II DQE components were within laboratory QC limits with the following exception:
The field duplicate relative percent difference in duplicate pair OW 101-L-CC and OW 101-L-C exceeded 20% for calcium (27%).
Action: The calcium results in sample OW 101-L-CC and OW 101-L-C were considered estimated and flagged "J".
In addition, qualification was required for the following:
Results were present between the MDL and RL and flagged "JQ".
Any result reported between the RL and MDL is considered a quantitative estimate. The results reported between the RL and MDL were flagged by the laboratory with a "J" qualifier. AMEC changed the "J" to a "JQ" qualifier.
Action:
The associated sample results were qualified as estimated and flagged "JQ" unless overridden by other QC criteria in the following samples:
Anions (Method MCAWW 300.0)
Iron OW-419-U-C OW 417-L-C The groundwater samples were submitted to TAL for anions (bromide, chloride, fluoride, and sulfate) analysis by MCAWW Method 300.0. The Level II DQE components were within laboratory QC limits with the following exception:
The field duplicate relative percent difference in duplicate pair OW 420-L and DUP-1 exceeded 20%
for chloride (21 %).
Action: The chloride results in duplicate pair OW-420-L and DUP-1 were considered estimated and flagged "J".
MS/MSD recoveries for fluoride recovered high in MSD spiked sample OW 401 -L-A and in spiked sample OW 420-L.
Action: The fluoride results in samples OW 401-L-A and OW 420-L were flagged "JH".
SDG#s: TAL - 160-4584-1, 160-4600-1, 160-4625-1, 160-4643-1 4/10/2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-5 of 18 Page 3 of 11 RCN : CRP-1207.1 Page 4 of 17
a me Results were present between the MDL and RL and flagged "JQ".
Any result reported between the RL and MDL is considered a quantitative estimate. The results reported between the RL and MDL were flagged by the laboratory with a "J" qualifier. AMEC changed the "J" to a "JQ" qualifier.
Action:
The associated sample results were qualified as estimated and flagged "JQ" unless overridden by other QC criteria in the following samples:
Bromide Fluoride OW 101-L-AA OW416-L-A OW423-U-A OW 101-L-A OW417-L-A OW415-U-A OW-202-L Nitrate/Nitrite as N (Method MCAWW 300.0)
The groundwater samples were submitted to TAL for nitrate/nitrite as N analysis by MCAWW Method 300.0. The Level II DQE components were within laboratory QC limits with the following exception:
The field duplicate relative percent difference in duplicate pair OW 420-L and DUP-1 exceeded 20%
for nitrate (36%).
Action: The nitrate results in duplicate pair OW-420-L and DUP-1 were considered estimated and flagged "J".
MS/MSD recoveries for nitrite recovered high in spiked sample OW 409-U-A, nitrite recovered low in MSD spiked sample OW 401-L-A, and the MS/MSD recoveries for nitrite recovered low in spiked sample OW 415-U-A and sample OW-420-L.
Action: No qualification was required for high bias because nitrite was not detected in sample OW 409-U-A. The nitrite as N results in samples OW 401-L-A, OW 415-U-A, and OW 420-L were flagged "UL".
The initial calibration verification (ICV) failed low (89%) for nitrite in IC batch 91006. The following samples in this batch were all ND for nitrite: DUP-1, OW 202-L, OW 420-L, OW 421-L. By the time the excursion was discovered by the laboratory, the samples were out of 2x hold for nitrite. A reanalysis of the samples was performed on 12/06/13, which verified the original ND status of the samples. These samples are reported for Nitrite from the original run, with the reanalysis data provided in the data package.
Action: The nitrite results reported in samples DUP-1, OW 202-L, OW 420-L, OW 421-L were qualified as estimated with a possible low bias and flagged "UL ".
In addition, qualification was required for the following:
Results were present between the MDL and RL and flagged "JQ".
Any result reported between the RL and MDL is considered a quantitative estimate. The results reported between the RL and MDL were flagged by the laboratory with a "J" qualifier. AMEC changed the "J" to a "JQ" qualifier.
SDG#s: TAL-160-4584-1, 160-4600-1, 160-4625-1, 160-4643-1 4/10/2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-6 of 18 Page 4 of 11 RCN: CRP-1207.1 Page 5 of 17
a me Action:
The associated sample results were qualified as estimated and flagged "JQ" unless overridden by other QC criteria in the following samples:
Nitrate Nitrite OW 101-L-AA OW409-L-AA OW 101-L-A Ammonia (Method 350.1)
The groundwater samples were submitted to TAL for ammonia analysis by EPA Method 350.1. The Level II DQE components were within laboratory QC limits with the following exception:
The holding time of 28 days was exceeded by several days resulting in a possible low bias.
The continuing calibration verification (CCV) standard recovered high or low for some samples.
Field duplicate precision exceeded 20% in duplicate pair OW 420-L/DUP-1.
MS/MSD recoveries for ammonia recovered high in spiked sample OW 409-U-A.
Action: The ammonia results for samples reported in SDGs 160-4584-1, 160-4600-1, 160-4625-1, and 160-4643-1 were qualified "J" due to holding time exceedence, CCV recovery, field duplicate precision, and/or MSIMSD recovery.
Total Dissolved Solids (Method 160.1)
The groundwater samples were submitted toTAL for TDS analysis by EPA Method 160.1. The Level II DQE components were within laboratory QC limits.
Alkalinity (Method 310.1)
The groundwater samples were submitted to TAL for alkalinity (bicarbonate/carbonate) analysis by EPA Method 310.1. The Levell! DQE components were within laboratory QC limits.
Cation/Anion Balance (Method SM1030F)
The groundwater samples were submitted to TAL for cation/anion balance analysis by Standard Method SM1030F. The cation/anion balance results were reviewed based on accuracy checks recommended by the USGS (USGS, 1992) and resulted in the following observations:
The sum of cations did not equal the absolute value of the sum of anions and/or were not within 1-2% differencefor0W-101L, OW-409U, and OW-415U.
The% error exceeded s 5% for OW-101L, OW-409U, and OW-415U.
A "total" metals fraction was analyzed instead of the "dissolved" metals fraction.
The o/oD between the measured TDS and the calculated TDS were generally below 5% indicating a relatively good correlation.
Action: An interpretation of results indicate that the cations are higher than the anions because "total" metals were analyzed for instead of "dissolved" metals resulting in a high bias. A "total" digestion will dissolve metals from any suspended solids, elevating the cations. In addition, the samples that exhibited high % errors contained calcium greater than 100 mg/L. Table 1 presents the summary of the cation/anion balance evaluation.
SDG#s: TAL - 160-4584-1, 160-4600-1, 160-4625-1, 160-4643-1 4/10/2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-7 of 18 Page 5 of 11 RCN: CRP-1207.1 Page 6 of 17
a me Overall Site Evaluation and Professional Judgment Flagging Changes The chemical data included in these SDGs was validated in general accordance with the guidelines contained in the project work plan and DQE flags were applied as indicated.
The data is usable with qualification. As previously discussed, the ammonia data is estimated and may be either biased low due to hold time exceedence or biased high due to CCV and/or MS exceedence.
Although the hold times were exceeded, the impact to the results is minimal because the samples were preserved and analyzed within 2x the recommended hold time. The cation/anion balance review indicates that the geochemical data collected for wells OW 1 01-L, OW 409-U, and OW 415-U show a poor correlation between the anions and cations balance. Factors that may affect the cation/anion balance may include the following:
A "total" metals analysis was performed instead of a "dissolved" analysis.
The presence of limestone in the Oakridge, Tennessee area groundwater. When the metals sample is placed in a bottle preserved with nitric acid to lower the pH<2, the limestone will react with the acid and form calcium carbonate yielding higher calcium results. Each of these wells had elevated calcium (> 120 mg/L).
Laboratory error A validated data summary of the analytical results is presented in Table 2.
Completeness Summary Completeness is defined by the percentage of analytical results judged to be valid (including estimated values). Based on the preceding criteria, this data set reported for the groundwater samples is usable with the qualifications discussed above.
There were 13 locations plus 2 duplicate locations submitted for 24 parameters each for a total of 360 points. Overall, there were 360 laboratory soil data points reported. The calculated analytical completeness for the data evaluated from the soil sampling event is 100% because no data points were rejected. The analytical completeness achieves a completeness goal of at least 90%.
References AMEC, 2013.
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Clinch River Project Work Plan, Attachment 6:
Observation Well and Water Level Monitoring and Sampling Procedures, Revision 0, RCN: CRP-1070.0, May 20, 2013.
AMEC, 2013. Nuclear Safety-Related Quality Assurance Project Document Clinch River SMR Project, Revision 2, RCN: CRP-1069.0, May 17, 2013.
S DG#s: TAL - 160-4584-1, 160-4600-1, 160-4625-1, 160-4643-1 4/10/2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-8 of 18 Prepared by/Date: J. Hartness 04/09/14 Checked by/Date: P. Brafford 04/09/14
!h-'<vj4J 4Vo}t4-Page 6 of 11 RCN: CRP-1 207.1 Page 7 of 17
Data Quality Evaluation Checklists SDG#s: TAL - 160-4584-1, 160-4600-1, 160-4625-1, 160-4643-1 4/10/2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-9 of 18 a me Page 7 of 11 RCN: CRP-1207.1 Page 8 of 17
LEVEL 11/111 DATA QUALITY VALIDATION RECORD Project: Clinch River SMR Project No: 6468-13-1072 Method: Metals by SW6020 Laboratory and Lot: TAL SDG: 160-4584-1 I 160-4600-1 I 160-4625-1 I 160-4643-1 Reviewer/Date: J. Hartness 02/19/14 Senior Reviewer/Date: P. Brafford 02/20/14 COMMENTS Metals (calcium, iron, magne~ium, manganese, potassium, silica, and sodium) was analyzed on groundwater samples: OW 101-L-CC, OW 101-L-C, OW 202-L, OW 401-L-CC, OW 409-U-C, OW 409-L-CC, OW 415-U-C, OW 416-U-C, OW 417-L-CC, OW 418-U-C, OW 419-U-C, OW 420-L/DUP-1, OW 421 -
L, OW 423-U-C.
I8J Case Narrative and COC Completeness Review IXl Comoound 101L (moll)
Ca 130 Fe 0.33 K
2.1 Mg 23 Mn 0.05 Na 7.8 s
3.9 Si02 8.3 Holding times met (6 months)
SDG: 160-4584-1 : Collected: 11/19/13: Prepared: 11/26/13; Analyzed: 12/6/13 SDG: 160-4600-1 : Collected: 11/20/13: Prepared: 11/26/13; Analyzed: 12/6/13 SDG: 160-4625-1 : Collected: 11/21/13: Prepared: 12/2/13; Analyzed: 12/7/13 SDG: 160-4643-1 : Collected: 11/22/13: Prepared: 12/2/13; Analyzed: 12/7/13 Calibration Criteria met (if applicable)
QC Blanks Review SDG: 160-4584-1: MB 160-88197/1 -A = ND SDG: 160-4600-1: MB 160-88197/1-A = ND SDG: 160-4625-1 : MB 160-88861/1-A = ND SDG: 160-4643-1: MB 160-88861/1-A = ND Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) recovery within limits SDG: 160-4584-1 : LCS 160-88197/2-A = ok SDG: 160-4600-1 : LCS 160-88197/2-A = ok SDG: 160-4625-1 : LCS 160-88861/2-A = ok SDG: 160-4643-1 : LCS 160-88861/2-A = ok Lab Duplicate - Field Duplicate precision goals met (20%)
Duo (moiL)
RPD Flqg 420L (moll)
Duo (moll)
RPD 99 27 flag J 59 59 0
0.31 3.1 ok - no flag 0.25 0.29 15 2.1 0
ok-no flag 1.8 1.9 5
22 4.8 ok - no flag 26 26 0
0.048 4.1 ok - no flag 0.33 0.32 3
7.6 2.6 ok - no flag 1.2 1.3 8
4.2 7.4 ok - no flag 4.2 4.4 5
9 8.1 ok - no flag 9
9.4 4
Matrix Spike recoveries and RPDs within limits (if applicable)
MS/MSD performed on project samples; OW 409-L-CC Flqg ok-no flag ok - no flag ok - no flag ok - no fl<!g_
ok - no flag_
ok - no flag ok-no flag ok - no flag Ca: 120/129% RPD = 8.1 (QC limits: 75-120%/20) =No flag sample results >4x spike amount EDD Data Verification vs. Hardcopy (1 0% samples for each SDG)
EDD not submitted SDG#s: TAL - 160-4584-1, 160-4600-1 I 160-4625-1, 160-4643-1 4/10/2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-10 of 18 Page 8 of 11 RCN: CRP-1207.1 Page 9 of 17
a me LEVEL 111111 DATA QUALITY VALIDATION RECORD Project: Clinch River SMR Project No: 6468-13-1072 Method: Anions by MCAWW 300.0 Laboratory and Lot: TAL SOG: 160-4584-1, 160-4600-1. 160-4625-1, 160-4643-1 Reviewer/Date: J. Hartness 02/19/14 Senior Reviewer/Date: P. Brafford 02/20/14 COMMENTS Anions (bromide, chloride, fluoride, nitrate/nitrite as N, and sulfate) was analyzed on groundwater samples: OW 101-L-AA, OW 101-L-A, OW 202-L, OW 401-L-AA, OW 409-U-A, OW 409-L-AA, OW 415-U-A, OW 416-U-A, OW 417-L-AA, OW 418-U-A, OW 419-U-A, OW 420-L/OUP-1, OW 420-L, OW 421 -L, OW 423-U-A.
[gj
[8]
181 Compound 101L {mQ{LJ N03 0.0054 J Fluoride 0.22 Chloride 2.1 Bromide 0.038 J Sulfate 42 Case Narrative and COC Completeness Review Holding times met (28 Days)
SOG: 160-4584-1: Collected: 11/19/13: Analyzed: 11/20/13 SOG: 160-4600-1 : Collected: 11/20/13: Analyzed: 11/21/13 SOG: 160-4625-1 : Collected: 11/21/13: Analyzed: 11/22/13 SOG: 160-4643-1: Collected: 11/22/13: Analyzed: 11/23/14 Calibration Criteria met (if applicable)
ICV low for nitrite (*(%) Flag "UL" OUP-1, OW 202-L, OW 420-L, OW 421 -L QC Blanks Review SOG: 160-4584-1: MB 160-88825/3 =NO SOG: 160-4600-1: MB 160-88747/3 =NO SOG: 160-4625-1: MB 160-88451/10 = NO SOG: 160-4643-1: MB 160-91006/9 =NO Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) recovery within limits SOG: 160-4584-1 : LCS 160-88825/4 = ok SOG: 160-4600-1: LCS 160-88747/4 = ok SOG: 160-4625-1: LCS 1160-88451/11 = ok SOG: 160-4643-1 : LCS 160-91006/1 0 = ok Lab Duplicate-Field Duplicate precision goals met (20%)
Duo lmo/L\\
RPD Flag 420L {mQ/L)
Duo lma/L\\
0.0099 J NC BelowRL 0.36 0.25 0.19 14.6 ok-no flag 0.31 0.35 2.1 0
ok - no flag 2.1 2.6 0.040 J NC BelowRL ND ND 43 2.3 ok - no flag 14 15 RPD 36 12 21 NC 7
Matrix Spike recoveries and RPDs within limits (if applicable)
FI<!Q Flag "J" ok - no flag Flag "J" NA ok-no flag MS/MSO performed on project sample; OW 409-U-A; N02: 171/181% RPO = 5 (QC limits: 90-110%/20) =No flag for high bias when sample results NO MS/MSO performed on project sample; OW 401 -L-A; N02: 79% (QC limits:
90-110%/20) = flag "UL"; F: 111% (QC limits: 90-110%/20) = flag positives "JH" MS/MSO performed on project sample; OW 415-U-A; N02: 42/43% (QC limits:
90-11 0%/20) =flag "UL" MS/MSO performed on project sample; OW 420-L; N02: 70/71 % (QC limits:
90-11 0%/20) =flag "UL"; Fl: 112/112% (QC limits: 90-11 0%/20) Flag "JH" SDG#s: TAL - 160-4584-1, 160-4600-1, 160-4625-1, 160-4643-1 4/10/2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-11 of 18 Page 9 of 11 RCN: CRP-1207.1 Page 10 of 17
LEVEL 11/111 DATA QUALITY VALIDATION RECORD (continued)
Project: Clinch River SMR Project No: 6468-13-1072 Method: Anions by MCAWW 300.0 a me Laboratory and Lot: TAL SDG: 160-4584-1, 160-4600-1. 160-4625-1. 160-4643-1 Reviewer/Date: J. Hartness 02/19/14 Senior Reviewer/Date: P. Brafford 02/20/14 COMMENTS Anions (bromide, chloride, fluoride, nitrate/nitrite as N, and sulfate) was analyzed on groundwater samples: OW 101-L-AA, OW 101 -L-A, OW 202-L, OW 401-L-AA, OW 409-U-A, OW 409-L-AA, OW 415-U-A, OW 416-U-A, OW 417-L-AA, OW 418-U-A, OW 419-U-A, OW 420-L/DUP-1, OW 420-L, OW 421-L, OW 423-U-A.
18]
EDD Data Verification vs. Hardcopy (10% samples for each SDG)
EDD not submitted SDG#s: TAL -1 60-4584-1 I 160-4600-1 I 160-4625-1, 160-4643-1 4/10/2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-12 of 18 Page 10 of 11 RCN: CRP-1207.1 Page 11 of 17
a me LEVEL 111111 DATA QUALITY VALIDATION RECORD Project: Clinch River SMR Project No: 6468-13-1072 Method: Ammonia by MCAWW 350.1 I TOS by 160.1 and Alkalinity by 310.1 Laboratory and Lot: TAL SOG: 160-4584-1 I 160-4600-1 I 160-4625-1 I 160-4643-1 Reviewer/Date: J. Hartness 02/19/14 Senior Reviewer/Date: P. Brafford 02/20/14 YES NO NA COMMENTS TOS was analyzed on the "A" samples, alkalinity was analyzed on the "B" samples, and ammonia was analyzed on the "0 " samples for the following groundwater locations: OW 1 01 -L, OW 1 01 -LOup, OW 202-L, OW 401 -L, OW 409-U, OW 409-L, OW 415-U, OW 416-U. OW 417-L, OW 418-U, OW 419-U. OW 420-UOUP-1, OW 421-L. OW 423-U.
181 Case Narrative and COC Completeness Review igj Holding times met (NH3: 28 Days, TDS: 7 days, Alk: 14 days)
SOG: 160-4584-1 : Collected: 11/19/13: Analyzed: NH3: 12/23/13 Flag "JL"; TOS:11/27/13; Alk: 12/03/13 SOG: 160-4600-1: Collected: 11/20/13: Analyzed: NH3: 12/23/13 Flag "JL"; TOS:11/27/13; Alk: 12/03/13 SOG: 160-4625-1: Collected: 11/21/13: Analyzed: NH3: 12/23/13 Flag "JL"; TOS:11/27/13; Alk: 12/03/13 SOG: 160-4643-1: Collected: 11/22/13: Analyzed: NH3: 01/07/13 Flag "JL"; TDS:11/27/13; Alk: 12/03/13 181 Calibration Criteria met (if applicable)
SDG: 160-4584-1: ok SDG: 160-4600-1: NH3: CCV 111.6% Flag "JH" in OW 415-U-D. OW 418-U-D, OW 419-U-D SDG: 160-4625-1 : NH3: CCV 111.6% Flag "JH" in OW 401 -L-D, OW 416-L-D, OW 417-L-0 SDG: 160-4643-1 : NH3: CCV 111.6% Flag "JH" in OW 202-L-D, OW 420-L-D/Dup, CCV 82% Flag "UL" in OW 421 -L-D 18]
[XI Com_Q_ound 101L lmo/Ll NH3 0.310 TDS 370 Alkalinity 300 QC Blanks Review SDG: 160-4584-1 : All MBs = ND SDG: 160-4600-1 : All MBs = ND SDG: 160-4625-1 : All MBs = ND SDG: 160-4643-1: All MBs = ND Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) recovery within limits SDG: 160-4584-1 : All LCS = ok SDG: 160-4600-1: All LCS = ok SDG: 160-4625-1 : All LCS = ok SDG: 160-4643-1 : All LCS = ok Lab Duplicate-Field Duplicate precision goals met (20%)
Duo lmo/Ll RPD Fl~
420L lmo/L\\
Duo lmo/Ll RPD 0.350 12 ok - no flag 0.110 0.140 24 370 0
ok - no flag 270 280 4
290 3.4 ok - no flag 230 240 4
Fla_g Flag "J" ok-no flag ok-no flag Lab Dup performed for TDS and alkallmty on samples OW 409-L, OW 401-L, OW 419-U - all ok Lab Dup.J?erformed for TDS and alkalinity on samples OW 409-L. OW 420-L - all ok
~
Matrix Spike recoveries and RPDs within limits (if applicable)
MS performed on project sample; OW 409-L-D;NH3: 115% (QC limits: 90-11 0%/20) = flag positives " JH" MS performed on project sample; OW 420-L-D;NH3: 119% (QC limits: 90-11 0%/20) =flag positives " JH"
[81 EDD Data Verification vs. Hardcopy (10% samples for each SDG)
EDD not submitted Final flags for NH3 = JH+JL = J SDG#s: TAL -1 60-4584-1, 160-4600-1, 160-4625-1, 160-4643-1 4/10/2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-13 of 18 Page 11 of 11 RCN: CRP-1207.1 Page 12 of 17
TABLE 1 - Revision 1 (a)
Cation/Anion Evaluation Clinch River SMR Well Number Date OW-101L 11/19/2013 OW-101L DUP 11/19/2013 OW-202L 11/22/2013 OW-401L 11/21/2013 OW-409U 11/19/2013 OW-409L 11/18/2013 OW-415U 11/20/2013 OW-416L 11/21/2013 OW-417L 11/21/2013 OW-418U 11/19/2013 OW-419U 11/20/2013 OW-420L 11/22/2013 OW-420L DUP 11/22/2013 OW-421L 11/22/2013 OW-423U 11/19/2013 Notes:
Anions Sum of Anions (meq/L) 6.9 6.8 17 3.8 7.3 9.2 6.5 7.6 6.8 6.0 5.8 5.0 5.2 4.6 6.4
~Jar1ons Sum of Cations (meq/L) 8.8 7.2 16 3.9 9.1 9.4 8.9 7.3 6.7 6.0 6.1 5.2 5.2 5.0 6.9
~JatlonJAnlon l:ja1ance Ratio of
%Error (:S lon Balance Cations to Anions 5%)
~1.05; Fair=
>1.05<1.2; Poor= >1.2 1.27 12 RODr 1.06 3
fair 0.94
-3.1 good 1.03 1.3 good 1.26 11 poor 1.02 1.03 good 1.37 16 poor 0.97
-1.7 good 0.98
-0.82 good 1.00 0.14 good 1.04 2.0 good 1.04 2.1 good 1.00
-0.1 good 1.08 3.9 fair 1.08 4.0 fair Milli-equivalent factors as listed in Study and Interpretation of the Chemical Characteristics of Natural Water, Water Supply Paper 2254, 3rd Edition, 1992.
meq/L = milli-equivalents per liter See Tables 1 a and 1 b for supporting details on Cations and Anions.
(aJ Table revised for correction of Manganese result in well OW-419U.
Prepared by/Date JAH 4/09/14 Checked by/Date WPB 4/09/14 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-14 of 18 RCN: CRP-1207.11 of 1 Page 13 of 17
TABLE 1a-Revision 1 (aJ Cation Evaluation Clinch River SMR Well Number Date OW-101L 11/19/2013 OW-101L DUP 11/19/2013 OW-202L 11/22/2013 OW-401L 11/21/2013 OW-409U 11/19/2013 OW-409L 11/19/2013 OW-415U 11/20/2013 OW-416L 11/21/2013 OW-417L 11/21/2013 OW-418U 11/20/2013 OW-419U 11/20/2013 OW-420L 11/22/2013 OW-420L DUP 11/22/2013 OW-421L 11/22/2013 OW-423U 11/19/2013 Notes:
Ammonia as NH, (m9/L) 0.310 0.350 0.580 0.140 0.099 0.710 0.140 0.120 0.140 0.059 0.140 0.110 0.140 0.000 0.083 Ammonia as Ammonia as NH, NH, (m9/L)
(meq/L) 0.328 0.0182 0.371 O.D205 0.614 0.0340 0.148 0.0082 0.105 0.0058 0.752 0.0417 0.148 0.0082 0.127 0.0070 0.148 0.0082 0.062 0.0035 0.148 0.0082 0.116 0.0065 0.148 0.0082 0.000 0.0000 0.088 0.0049 Calcium Calcium Iron Iron Potassium (m9/L)
(meq/L)
(m9/L)
(meq/L)
(m9/L) 130 6.49 0.33 0.0177 2.1 99 4.94 0.31 0.0167 2.1 23 1.15 19 1.0207 14 40 2.00 0.14 0.0075 1.8 140 6.99 0.22 0.0118 1.2 46 2.30 0.068 0.0037 8.1 150 7.49 0.39 0.0210 2.4 99 4.94 0.072 0.0039 0.77 61 3.04 0.041 0.0022 3.4 52 2.59 0.055 0.0030 2.7 72 3.59 0.023 0.0012 1.5 59 2.94 0.25 0.0134 1.8 59 2.94 0.29 0.0156 1.9 38 1.90 0.23 0.0124 12 gg 4.94 0.076 0.0041 1.3 Milli-equivalent factors as listed in Study and Interpretation of the Chemical Characteristics of Natural Water, Water Supply Paper 2254, 3rd Edition, 1992.
meq/L = milli-equivalents per liter mg/L =milligrams per liter NH 3 =Ammonia NH 4 =Ammonium (aJ Table revised for correction of Manganese result in well OW-419U.
Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-15 of 18 Cations Potassium Magnesium Magnesium Manganese Manganese (meq/L)
(m9/L)
(meq/L)
(m9/L)
(meq/L) 0.0537 23 1.893 0.05 0.002 0.0537 22 1.810 0.048 0.002 0.3581 9.9 0.815 0.16 0.006 0.0460 22 1.810 0.008 0.0003 0.0307 23 1.893 0.011 0.0004 0.2072 31 2.551 0.017 0.001 0.0614 13 1.070 0.046 0.002 0.0197 13 1.070 0.02 0.001 0.0870 31 2.551 0.021 0.001 0.0691 19 1.564 0.0037 0.0001 0.0384 29 2.386 0.0023 0.0001 0.0460 26 2.140 0.033 0.001 0.0486 26 2.140 0.032 0.001 0.3070 27 2.222 0.01 0.0004 0.0333 19 1.564 0.051 0.002 Sodium Sodium (m9/L)
(meq/L) 7.8 0.339 7.6 0.331 280 12.180 0.91 0.040 4.8 0.209 99 4.307 5.2 0.226 29 1.262 22 0.957 40 1.740 0.91 0.040 1.2 0.052 1.3 0.057 12 0.522 8.7 0.378 Sum of Silica Silica Cations (m9/L)
(meq/L)
(meq/L)
"~no 8.3 charge NA no 9
charge NA no 170 charge NA no 10 charge NA no 16 charge NA no 9.9 charge NA no 16 charge NA no 11 charge NA no 13 charge NA no 19 charge NA no 6.8 charge NA no 9
charge NA no 9.4 charge NA no 13 charge NA no 15 charge Prepared by/Date: JAH 4/09/14 Checked by/Date: WPB 4/09/14 RCN: CRP-1207.1 Page 14 of 17 8.8 7.2 16 3.9 9.1 9.4 8.9 7.3 6.7 6.0 6.1 5.2 5.2 5.0 6.9 1 of 1
TABLE 1b Anion Evaluation Clinch River SMR Well Number OW-101L OW-101L DUP OW-202L OW-401L OW-409U OW-409L OW-415U OW-416L OW-417L OW-418U OW-419U OW-420L OW-420L DUP OW-421L OW-423U Notes:
Date 11/19/2013 11/19/2013 11/22/2013 11/21/2013 11/19/2013 11/18/2013 11/20/2013 11/21/2013 11/21/2013 11/19/2013 11/20/2013 11/22/2013 11/22/2013 11/22/2013 11/19/2013 N03 as N N03 as N N02 as N (mg/L)
(meq/L)
(mg/L) 0.0054 0.0004 0
0.0099 0.0007 0
0.028 0.0020 0
0.15 0.0107 0
0.88 0.0628 0
0.12 0.0086 0.0052 0.9 0.0643 0
0.2 0.0143 0
0 0.0000 0
0.68 0.0486 0
0.43 0.0307 0
0.36 0.0257 0
0.25 0.0179 0
1.6 0.1142 0
0.14 0.0100 0
N02 as N Fluoride Fluoride Chloride Chloride (meq/L)
(mg/L)
(meq/L)
(mg/L)
(meq/L) 0 0.22 0.0116 2.1 0.0592 0
0.19 0.0100 2.1 0.0592 0
7.4 0.3895 24 0.6770 0
0.2 0.0105 1.4 0.0395 0
0.25 0.0132 1.8 0.0508 0.0004 0.37 0.0195 2.2 0.0621 0
0.13 0.0068 8.8 0.2482 0
0.39 0.0205 7.6 0.2144 0
0.18 0.0095 2.8 0.0790 0
0.3 0.0158 2.7 0.0762 0
0.16 0.0084 1.3 0.0367 0
0.31 0.0163 2.1 0.0592 0
0.35 0.0184 2.6 0.0733 0
0.58 0.0305 2.6 0.0733 0
0.09 0.0047 2.7 0.0762 Milli-equivalent factors as listed in Study and Interpretation of the Chemical Characteristics of Natural Water, Water Supply Paper 2254, 3rd Edition, 1992.
meq/L = milli-equivalents per liter mg/L =milligrams per liter CaC03 = Calcium Carbonate N02 = Nitrite N03 = Nitrate N =Nitrogen Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-16 of 18 Anions Bicarbonate
,AJk as Bromide Bromide Sulfate Sulfate CaC0 3 (mg/L)
(meq/L)
(mg/L)
(meq/L)
(mg/L) 0.038 0.0005 42 0.8744 300 0.04 0.0005 43 0.8953 290 0.17 0.0021 93 1.9363 600 0
0.0 6.9 0.1437 180 0
0.0 83 1.7281 270 0
0.0 150 3.1230 300 0.053 0.0007 36 0.7495 270 0.071 0.0009 63 1.3117 300 0.048 0.0006 13 0.2707 320 0
0.0 20 0.4164 270 0
0.0 17 0.3539 270 0
0.0 14 0.2915 230 0
0.0 15 0.3123 240 0
0.0 8.3 0.1728 210 0
0.0 24 0.4997 290 Bicarbonate
,AJk as CaC0 3 (meq/L) 6 5.8 12 3.6 5.4 6
5.4 6
6.4 5.4 5.4 4.6 4.8 4.2 5.8 Carbonate Carbonate
,AJk as
,AJk as CaC0 3 CaC0 3 (mg/L)
(meq/L) 0 0
0 0
78 1.56 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Prepared by/Date: JAH 2/20/14 Checked by/Date: WPB 2/20/14 Sum of Anions (meq/L)
RCN: CRP-1207.1 Page 15 of 17 6.9 6.8 17 3.8 7.3 9.2 6.5 7.6 6.8 6.0 5.8 5.0 5.2 4.6 6.4 1 of 1
TABLE 2 -Revision 1 (aJ Validated Analytical Data Summary Clinch River SMR Method Parameter Anions 300.0 Nitrate as N 300.0 Nitrite as N 300.0 Fluoride 300.0 Chloride 300.0 Bromide 300.0 Sulfate Alkalinity 310.1 Total Alkalinity 310.1 Bicarbonate Alk as CaC03 310.1 Carbonate Alk as CaC03 Ammonia 350.1 Ammonia Total Dissolved Solids TDS Total Metals SW6020A Calcium SW6020A Iron SW6020A Potassium SW6020A Magnesium SW6020A Manganese SW6020A Sodium SW6020A Silicon SW6020A Silica Cation/Anion Balance SM1030F Sum of Anions SM1030F Sum of Cations SM1030F Cation/Anion Balance SM1030F
%Error Notes:
Well Location:
Sample Date:
Units mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L meq/L meq/L (aJ Table revised for correction of Manganese result in well OW-419U.
meq/L = milliequivalents per liter mg/L = milligrams per liter
%=percent Data Qualifier Definitions J = Estimated quantitation based on associated QC data JQ = Estimated quantitation; value is between the reporting limit and the detection limit JH = Estimated quantitation; possibly biased high based on QC data JL = Estimated quantitation; possibly biased low based on QC data U = Undetected.
UJ = Undetected; the reporting detection limit is considered imprecise.
UL = Undetected; data biased low: the reporting detection limit is higher than indicated.
Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-17 of 18 OW-101L OW-101L DUP OW-202L 11/19/2013 11/19/2013 11/22/2013 Result Qual Result Qual Result Qual 0.0054 JQ 0.0099 JQ 0.028
<0.020 u
<0.020 u
<0.020 UL 0.22 0.19 7.4 2.1 2.1 24 0.038 JQ 0.04 JQ 0.17 JQ 42 43 93 300 290 680 300 290 600
<5.0 u
<5.0 u 78 0.310 J 0.350 J 0.580 J 370 370 1100 130 J 99 J 23 0.33 0.31 19 2.1 2.1 14 23 22 9.9 0.05 0.048 0.16 7.8 7.6 280 3.9 4.2 82 8.3 9
170 6.9 6.8 17 8.8 7.2 16 12 3.0
-3.2 12 3.0
-3.2 OW-401L OW-409U 11/21/2013 11/19/2013 Result Qual Result Qual 0.15 0.88
<0.020 UL
<0.020 u 0.20 JH 0.25 1.4 1.8
<0.25 u
<0.25 u 6.9 83 180 270 180 270
<5.0 u
<5.0 u 0.140 J 0.099 J 190 410 40 140 0.14 0.22 1.8 1.2 22 23 0.008 0.011 0.91 4.8 4.7 7.6 10 16 3.8 7.2 3.9 9.1 1.4 12 1.4 12 OW-409L OW-415U 11/19/2013 11/20/2013 Result Qual Result Qual 0.12 0.90 0.0052 JQ
<0.020 UL 0.37 0.13 2.2 8.8
<0.25 u 0.053 JQ 150 36 300 270 300 270
<5.0 u
<5.0 u 0.710 J 0.140 J 520 370 46 150 0.068 0.39 8.1 2.4 31 13 0.017 0.046 99 5.2 4.6 7.6 9.9 16 9.2 6.5 9.4 8.9 1.1 16 1.1 16 OW-416L 11/21/2013 Result Qual 0.20
<0.020 u 0.39 7.6 0.071 JQ 63 300 300
<5.0 u 0.120 J 420 99 0.072 0.77 13 0.020 29 5
11 7.6 7.3
-1.7
-1.7 RCN: CRP-1207.1 1 of 2 Page 16 of 17
TABLE 2 -Revision 1 (aJ Validated Analytical Data Summary Clinch River SMR Method Parameter Anions 300.0 Nitrate as N 300.0 Nitrite as N 300.0 Fluoride 300.0 Chloride 300.0 Bromide 300.0 Sulfate Alkalinity 310.1 Total Alkalinity 310.1 Bicarbonate Alk as CaC03 310.1 Carbonate Alk as CaC03 Ammonia 350.1 Ammonia Total Dissolved Solids TDS Total Metals SW6020A Calcium SW6020A Iron SW6020A Potassium SW6020A Magnesium SW6020A Manganese SW6020A Sodium SW6020A Silicon SW6020A Silica Cation/Anion Balance SM1030F Sum of Anions SM1030F Sum of Cations SM1030F Cation/Anion Balance SM1030F
%Error Notes:
Well Location:
Sample Date:
Units mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L meq/L meq/L (aJ Table revised for correction of Manganese result in well OW-419L meq/L = milliequivalents per liter mg/L = milligrams per liter
%=percent Data Qualifier Definitions J = Estimated quantitation based on associated QC data JQ = Estimated quantitation; value is between the reporting limit and the detection limit JH = Estimated quantitation; possibly biased high based on QC data JL = Estimated quantitation; possibly biased low based on QC data U = Undetected.
UJ = Undetected; the reporting detection limit is considered imprecise.
UL = Undetected; data biased low: the reporting detection limit is higher than indicated.
Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page H.1-18 of 18 OW-417L OW-418U 11/21/2013 11/20/2013 Result Qual Result Qual
<0.020 u 0.68
<0.020 u
<0.020 u 0.18 0.3 2.8 2.7 0.048 JQ
<0.25 u 13 20 320 270 320 270
<5.0 u
<5.0 u 0.140 J 0.059 J 340 300 61 52 0.041 JQ 0.055 3.4 2.7 31 19 0.021 0.0037 22 40 6.1 8.7 13 19 6.8 6.0 6.7 6.0
-0.76 0.019
-0.76 0.019 OW-419U OW-420L OW-420L DUP 11/20/2013 11/22/2013 11/22/2013 Result Qual Result Qual Result Qual 0.43 0.36 J 0.25 J
<0.020 u
<0.020 UL
<0.020 UL 0.16 0.31 JH 0.35 1.3 2.1 J 2.6 J
<0.25 u
<0.25 u
<0.25 u 17 14 15 270 230 240 270 230 240
<5.0 u
<5.0 u
<5.0 u 0.140 J 0.110 J 0.140 J 290 270 280 72 59 59 0.023 JQ 0.25 0.29 1.5 1.8 1.9 29 26 26 0.0023 0.033 0.032 0.91 1.2 1.3 3.2 4.2 4.4 6.8 9
9.4 5.8 5.0 5.2 6.1 5.2 5.2 2.0 2.1
-0.019 2.0 2.1
-0.019 OW-421L OW-423U 11/22/2013 11/19/2013 Result Qual Result Qual 1.6 0.14
<0.020 UL
<0.020 u 0.58 0.090 JQ 2.6 2.7
<0.25 u
<0.25 u 8.3 24 210 290 210 290
<5.0 u
<5.0 u
<0.050 UL 0.083 J 230 340 38 99 0.23 0.076 12 1.3 27 19 0.01 0.051 12 8.7 6
7.2 13 15 4.6 6.4 5.0 6.9 3.9 4.1 3.9 4.1 Prepared by/Date: JAH 4/09/14 Checked by/Date: WPB 4/09/14 RCN: CRP-1207.1 20f 2 Page 17 of 17