ML18003A672

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Minutes: NRC Region III Materials Program Impep MRB Meeting, October 12, 2017
ML18003A672
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/23/2018
From: Lance Rakovan
NRC/NMSS/DMSTR/ASPB
To:
Rakovan L
References
Download: ML18003A672 (3)


Text

MINUTES: MANAGEMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING OF REGION III October 12, 2017 The attendees were as follows:

In person at U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Headquarters in Rockville, Maryland:

Frederick Brown, MRB Chair, OEDO Lisa Dimmick, NMSS Marc Dapas, MRB Member, NMSS Lance Rakovan, NMSS Mary Spencer, MRB Member, OGC Paul Michalak, NMSS By videoconference:

Scott Morris, MRB Member, Region IV John Giessner, Region III Cynthia Pederson, Region III Christine Lipa, Region III John Miller, Team Member, Region I Jim Lynch, Region III/RSAO By telephone:

David Walter, MRB Member, AL, OAS Kathy Modes, NMSS Brian Goretzki, Team Member, AZ Joseph OHara, NMSS Lizette Roldan-Otera, Team Member, NMSS

1. Convention. Mr. Lance Rakovan convened the meeting at approximately 1:00 p.m. (ET).

He noted that this Management Review Board (MRB) meeting was open to the public.

Introductions of the attendees were conducted.

2. Region III IMPEP Review. Ms. Lisa Dimmick, Team Leader, led the presentation of the Region III Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program (IMPEP) review results to the MRB. She summarized the review and the teams findings for the five indicators reviewed. The review was conducted during the period of July 17-21, 2017, by a team composed of technical staff members from the NRC and the States of Arizona and New Jersey. A draft of this report was issued to Region III on August 18, 2017, for factual comment. Region III responded to the findings and conclusions of the review by electronic mail dated September 5, 2017. Ms. Dimmick reported that the team found the Region III materials program satisfactory for all performance indicators reviewed.
3. Common Performance Indicators.

a) Mr. Brian Goretzki reviewed and presented the common performance indicator, Technical Staffing and Training. His presentation corresponded to Section 3.1 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team, and Regional representatives discussed the turnover rate in the Region. Ms. Cynthia Pederson discussed the reasons that a number of currently vacant positions will not be filled.

The team found Region IIIs performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB agreed.

Region III MRB Meeting Minutes Page 2 b.) Mr. Goretzki reviewed and presented the common performance indicator, Status of Materials Inspection Program. His presentation corresponded to Section 3.2 of the proposed final IMPEP report.

The team found Region IIIs performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB agreed.

c.) Mr. John Miller reviewed and presented the common performance indicator, Technical Quality of Inspections. His presentation corresponded to Section 3.3 of the proposed final IMPEP report.

The team found Region IIIs performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB agreed.

d.) Ms. Nancy Stanley reviewed and presented the common performance indicator, Technical Quality of Licensing Actions. Her presentation corresponded to Section 3.4 of the proposed final IMPEP report.

The team found Region IIIs performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and after a brief discussion involving bankruptcies, the MRB agreed.

e.) Ms. Lizette Roldan-Otero reviewed and presented the findings regarding the common performance indicator, Technical Quality of Incident and Allegation Activities. Her presentation corresponded to Section 3.5 of the proposed final IMPEP report.

The team found Region IIIs performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB agreed.

4. MRB Consultation/Comments on Issuance of Report. The team recommended, and the MRB agreed, that the Region III materials program is adequate to protect public health and safety and compatible with the NRC's program. The team recommended, and the MRB agreed, the next IMPEP review take place in approximately five years with a periodic meeting mid-cycle. The final report may be found in the ADAMS using the Accession Number ML17289A092.
5. Precedents/Lessons Learned. None applicable to this review
6. Adjournment. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 1:35 p.m. (ET)

SUBJECT:

Summary of October 12, 2017 NRC Region III MRB Meeting ML18003A672 OFFICE MSTR/ASPB MSTR/ASPB NAME KMeyer LRakovan DATE 01/08/18 01/23/18 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY