ML17353A754

Discusses 960610 Meeting in Atlanta,Ga to Provide Assessment of Performance of Plant Units 3 & 4 Facilities.List of Attendees & FPL Plant Handout Encl

ML17353A754
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	06/21/1996
From:	Landis K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Plunkett T FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 9607020317
Download: ML17353A754 (97)

Text

June 21, 1996 Florida Power and Light Company ATTN:

Mr. T.

F. Plunkett President

- Nuclear Division P. 0.

Box 14000 Juno

Beach, FL 33408-0420

SUBJECT:

MEETING

SUMMARY

PRESENTATION OF ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE - TURKEY POINT 3 AND 4 -

DOCKET NOS.

50-250 AND 50-251

Dear Mr. Plunkett:

This refers to the meeting on June 10, 1996, at the NRC Region II office in Atlanta, Georgia.

The purpose of the meeting was to provide an assessment of the performance of the Turkey Point Unit 3 and Unit 4 facilities.

It is our opinion, that this meeting was very beneficial.

Enclosed is a List of Attendees and Florida Power and Light Turkey Point Handout.

The discussions included the following topics:

Operations, Maintenance, Engineering, and Plant Support.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of NRC's "Rules of Practice, "Part 2, Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.

Sincerely, Orig signed by Kerry D. Landis Kerry D. Landis, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 3

Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos.

50-250, 50-251 License Nos.

DPR-31, DPR-41

Enclosures:

1.

List of Attendees 2.

Turkey Point Handout cc w/encls:

H.

N. Paduano, Manager Licensing 8 Special

Programs, Florida Power and Light Company P. 0.

Box 14000 Juno

Beach, FL 33408-0420 cc w/encls:

Continued see page 2

~3OAP5 96070203i7 9'60621 PDR ADQCK 05000250 P

PDR OFFICIAL COPY

FP&L cc w/encls:

Continued E. Jernigan Plant General Manager

, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant P. 0.

Box 029100

Miami, FL 33102 R.. J.

Hovey, Site Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant P. 0.

Box 029100

Miami, FL 33102 G.

E. Hollinger, Licensing Manager Turkey Point Nuclear Plant P. 0.

Box 4332

Miami, FL 33032-4332 J.

R.

Newman, Esq.

Morgan, Lewis

& Bockius 1800 H Street, NW Washington, D.

C.

20036 John T. Butler, Esq.

Steel, Hector and Davis 4000 Southeast Financial Center

Hiami, FL 33131-2398 Attorney General Department 'of Legal Affairs The Capitol Tallahassee, FL 32304 Bill Passetti Office of Radiation Control Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1317 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-0700 Jack Shreve, Public Counsel Office of the Public Counsel c/o The Florida Legislature 111 West Madison Avenue, Room 812 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1400 Armando Vidal County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County 111 NW 1st Street, 29th Floor

Miami, FL 33128 Joe Hyers, Director Division of Emergency Preparedness Department of Community Affairs 2740 Centerview Drive

FP8IL Distributi on w encl s:

R. Croteau, NRR B. Crowley, RII G. Hallstrom, RII PUBLIC Thomas P.

Johnson Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0.

Box 1448 Homestead, FL 33090 SIGNATURE DLs I

NAME 06/

/96 YES NO 0 /

96 ES N

06/

/96 YES NO DATE COPY?

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY DOCUHENT NAME:

G: KTPSUM1.796 YES NO YES NO YES NO oe/

/96 oel

/ee oel

/ee

LIST OF ATTENDEES Florida Power and Li ht Com an T. Luke, Engineering Hanager V.'aminskas, Services Hanager G. Hollinger, Licensing Hanager R. Hovey, Vice President D. Jernigan, Plant Hanager G. Heisterman, Haintenance Hanager Nuclear Re ulator Commission R. Croteau, Project Hanager, Office of Nuclear Reactor. Regulation (NRR)

A. Gibson, Director, Division of Reactor Safety F,

Hebdon, Director, Project Directorate II-3, NRR T. Johnson, Senior Resident Inspector, Turkey Point K. Landis, Chief, Branch 3, Division of Reactor Projects Enclosure I

+>ear V~4 Presentation of Assessment of I icensee Per formance dune 1D, qcycy~

TURKEY POINT SALP SELF-ASSESSMENT AGENDA I

~$

ntroduction -------------------------- R J Hovey 0

F\\

I

~

peratIons.-----------------------------D E Jernigan 0

e M

tb aintenance ---------------------.------- R 6 Heisterman

~

~

Engineering -------------------------

J T L>eke LF ~

~ 0 ~u Plant Support ---------------------------V A Kam>nskas ummary ---------------------------- >

-> >covey S

NEW ORGANIZATION SITE VICEPRESIDENT R.J. HOVEY LANTGENERAL MANAGER D.E. JERNIGAN SERVICES MANAGER VA.KAMINSKAS BUSINESS SYSTEMS MANAGER J.R. HARTZOG LICENSING MANAGER G. E. HOLLINGER MATERIALS MANAGER R.E. ROSE QA MANAGER T.V.ABBATIELLO HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER R.B. MARSHALL ENGINEERING MANAGER J.T. LUKE MAINTENANCE MANAGER R. G. HEISTERMAN OPERAllONS MANAGER H. H. JOHNSON OUTAGE MANAGER P. HIGGINS

TURKEY POINT SALP SELF-ASSESSMENT Operations

P ERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

~ Achieved INPO 1 evaluation.

~ "Most improved nuclear plant during the 3 year period 1992-1994,"

American Nuclear Society, May 1995.

Nuclear Division completed 1994 and 1995 with highest availability in FPL history, with four refueling outages.

Set dual unit record run of 147 days

~ Continued success in achieving scheduled refueling outages that have resulted in reliable unit operation.

~ Reduction in station operating cost achieved with continued safe and reliable unit operation.

~ Record Runs Unit 3-253 days Unit 4-357 days

PLANTTRIPS 1994 Auto Trips

~ September - Unit 4 - Loss of Power to Rod Control Cabinets

~ November - Unit 4-Main Generator Ground; Loose Linkon.

'B'hase of Iso - Phase Bus i December - Unit 3 -'C'ain Feedwater Control Valve Failed Closed 1995 Auto Trips - NONE 1996 Auto Trips i February-Unit 3-High Steam Generator Level

UNITAVAILABILITYFACTOR 100 80 "

LU 60 z,'U O

~ ~+

40 0

619 65.4 85.4 1991-1996 89.6 98.5

'"'"'c AN).

97 Projected H UNIT3 H UNIT4 20 13.9

>><PPj'<',

0 1981-1990 0 991 eh o~

1992 1993 1/94 1995 YEAR

~<4 o~

1996

DUALUNIT RUNS 200

~ 150 O

~ 100 Gl

.50:.

76 102 103 147 0.

8/1 2/88 11/24/90 8/23/92 9/4/95

EXPOSURE HISTORY 1987 - 1996

~1,200 -

~

(0 I-1,000 UJ Z0 CD CC 400 UJ 0

1,290 DUAI UNIT

~ OUTAGE 909 275 1996 GOAL<<275 Projected 215 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 '992 1993

$994 1995 1996 YEAR

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS 3 - YEAR ROLLINGAVERAGE 1993-95 Turkey Point 384 Farley 182

. Burry 182

.. Robinson 1

Beaver Valley 1

- North Anna)82 0

50 159 174 I

100.,

150 200 Person-Rem per Unit 232 243 255 250 300

CONTAMINATEDFLOOR SPACE

..10,000 8,000 7,963 I-m 6,000 K

4,000 3,022 1995 GOAL <1500 SQ. FT.

2,000 0.

1,814 1,714 1,750 50.

4/5/96 30 1990 1991 1992 1993 YEAR 1994

'995 1996 10

RADIATIONPROTECTION

~ ALARABudget

~ 1996 Projection 200 Person-Rem

~ Radwaste Reduction Program

~ 3 DAW Shipments in 1995

~ 2 DAW Shipments in 1996 (Projected)

~ Automated Dosimetry and Access Control

~ Remote Job Coverage

~ Telemetric Dosimetry

~ Video Monitoring.System

TEMPORARY SYSTEM ALTERATIONS(TSAs) 100-80..

1987 - 1996 (YTD)

Annual Average 60 Z-CL 40--

0 20 29 38 19 0

I 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 YEAR 12

OVERTIME 30 1989 - 1996 25 25

~ 20

~+15 0

~o 10 20 19 14 10.3 Projected 9.3 0.

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Year 1995 1996

REFUELING OUTAGE DURATIONS Days 120 100 80 60

'0 64 47 44 34 35 20 01990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1994 Year 14 1995 1996

OPERATIONS SELF-ASSESSMENT WEAKNESSES IDENTIFIEDAND ADDRESSED

1. Sensitizing operators to PRA/PSA to enable crews to make informed decisions about removal of equipment from service

2. Noted need to further enhance oversight by control room supervision

3. Several incidents involving operation of incorrect valves or switches showed need to continue emphasis on self-checking

4. Need continued emphasis on operators having a critical questioning attitude

5. identified weakness in performance of routine activities

cvcs Beration 3/28/96 Event

~ Boration followed by primary water flush Root Cause and Generic Im lications

~ Procedural control for routine evolution did not need procedure in hand

~ Routine evolution was done from memory

~ Routine evolution was not done in accordance with procedure or management expectations Corrective Actions

~ Condition report generated to document root cause of the incident

~ SRO and line management oversight temporarily established to assess performance of routine operations

~ CVCS operating procedure now requires signoff

-~ All routine evolutions now require initials

~ Routine evolution proceduies will be reviewed by operators once

. each 6 months

~ Two personnel involved were removed from shift for retraining

~ All licensed operators to be retrained in CVCS operation

~ Independent review of event has been performed by QA

OP ERATIONS SELF-ASSESSMENT STRENGTHS

1. Conservative plant operations during refuelings Safety equipment not removed from service until after upper cavity flooded

-Complete core off-loads performed to prevent challenges during mid-loop operation

2. Strong. performance noted during shutdowns, start-ups, and response to trips

3. Strong reactivity management noted

4. Strong program to track control room deficiencies, identify operator workarounds, plant leaks, etc.

5. Excellent control room shift turnovers

6. Strong conservative on-line maintenance planning

MAlNTENANCE

MAINTENANCEDEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE MANAGER R. G. HESTERMAN MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL INSTR UMENTA770 AND CONTROL PROJECTS PLANNING

MAINTENANCESELF ASSESSMENT HIGHLIGHTS

~ Maintain low corrective maintenance backlog.

Reduced 1996 year end goal to 225

~ Continue to emphasize timely repair of Control Room deficiency tags. Backlog remains low.

~ Refueling Outage performance

~ Shortest duration refueling outage in site history (34 and 35 days for each unit}

~ Outage scope retained to ensure equipment reliability L

~ More work performed in-house. Promotes pride and quality of work

~ Record low radiation exposure for many significant maintenance activities

~ Units have run well following outages.

20

CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCEPWO BACKLOG

{NON-OUTAGE) 900 o) 800 700

~ 600 I 400 D> 300

+ 200 808

~ y

~\\ ~

~ y 00 767 674 550

~ ~

4 435 331 350 340 298

~g 302

~g ~g

~ oo 250 OUTAGE........ 182 NON-OUTAGE.257 TOTAL.............439 100 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 DATE TOTAL GOAL 21

CORRECTIVE PWOs > 12 MONTHS OLD 250 25 (NON-OUTAGE) 200 0

150 0

LLI 100 50 57 34 0

1991 1992 1993 DATE 1994

.1995 1996 22

Corrective PWO Backlog Age 300 250 0

~~ 200

• O <50

~m 100 50 0

0 6

. 9

-12 AGE IN MONTHS ACTUALTARGET 15 23

CONTROL ROOM DEFICIENCYTAGS (NON-OUTAGE) u) 300 Q

~ C 250 0-0 LLj 200

- V

~ 150 Q

O 100 K

50 R

0 65 82 65 88 89 90 91 OUTAGE...........;20 NON-OUTAGE..6 TOTAL.............. 26

~o

<o 92 YEAR 93 94 95 96 24

-. MATERIELCONDITION UPGRADE

~ Continuing Weekly Management Plant Walkdowns

/Action Items Generated and Tracked

~ Continuing to Emphasize Minimizing Primary and Secondary Leaks, Valve Packing and Overhaul Program has been Effective in Reducing Leaks

~ Over 6SO Insulation Deficiencies Corrected This SALP Period

~ Significant Areas Coated During This SALP Period U-3 EDGs

- Aux Feedwater Area U-3 &4CCWAreas

- U-3 &4Control Room Boric Acid Storage Tank Rm

- U-3 & 4 Main Steam Platforms All Non-Vital Battery Rooms

- U-3 8 4-Containment Areas U-3 Blowdown Cage

- U-3 Turbine Shell North and South containment breezeway Portions. of Rad-Waste Building 25

MAINTENANCESELF ASSESSMENT WEAKNESSES IDENTIFIEDANDADDRESSED

~ Increase in l&Cpersonnel errors

~ l&CStop Work Order

~ Additional Training required on STAR/Self Checking and,

.independent verification I

~ Job performance measures, performed to demonstrate understanding

~ Additional supervisory oversight provided to ensure implementation of management expectations 26

MAINTENANCESELF ASSESSMENT STRENGTHS

~ Quality of Work

~ No personnel-related trips due to I & C surveiliances since 1989

~ Low reworkfrepetative maintenance

~ High Unit availability factors

~ Personnel Safety

~ No Lost time accidents during SALP period. (764 days since last one.)

~ Minor injuries and OSHA recordable injuries are the lowest ever and continue to decline

~ Team work has resulted in effective Rad-Waste minimization efforts

~ Materiel Condition Upgrade Program 27

"RAISING THE BAR"

~ Condition Report Process

~ Evaluation of low threshold events for root cause

~ Condition report trends used to identify precursors to more significant issues

~ Corrective actions. assigned and tracked to closure

~ Quarterly trend analysis of maintenance performance

~ -Involvement in day-to-day operations

~ incorporate Industry lessons learned into Turkey Point programs as appropriate

~ Continue to benchmark against best performing plants

~ Continue to track/monitor department indicators; revise goals to maintain challenge

~ Continue self-assessment efforts 28

ENGINEERING 29

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PTN ENGINEERING MANAGER J. T. LUKE PROJECT ENGINEERS PLANTOPS SUPPORT PLANT ENGINEERING SYSTEMS ENGINEERING ADMIN STA RX ENG PNSC PLT ANALYST SYS PERP CIVIL MECH ELECTRICAL IBC DESIGN BASIS ELEC/I8 C MECH COMPONENTS PE SCHEDULER CLERKS DWG UPDATE NPRDS ANALYST 30

OLD ENG 8c TECH ORGANIZATIONS ENGINEERING MANAGER J. T:LUKE PRJ ENGINEER SITEMANAGER PRJ ENGINEER PEG MANAGER COS TANALYST PROC ENG TECHNICAL MANAGER R. WEST REACTOR ENGINEER SUPPORT SERVICES SYSTEM PERFORMANCE ELEC./I8 C ENGINEER NSSS ENGINEER BOP ENGINEER COMPONENT SPECIALIST 31

ENGINEERING ORGANIZATION

~ SCOPE: COMBINES ENGINEERING AND TECHNICALINTO ONE ORGANIZATION

~ BENEFITS

~ STREAMLINES ORGANIZATION

~ ALLENGINEERING FUNCTIONS IN ONE ORGANIZATION

~ ALLENGINEERS LOCATED AT THE PLANT I

~ ELIMINATESOVERLAPS BETWEEN THE GROUPS

~ PROMOTES BROADENING AND CROSS POLLINATIONOF ENG. SKILLS

~ BRINGS SYSTEM ENGINEERING KNOWLEDGETO ENGINEERING

~ BRINGS DESIGN BASIS KNOWLEDGETO SYSTEM ENGINEERS

~ PROMOTES TEAMWORK

~ WITHINENGINEERING

~ WITH OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

ENGINEERING HIGHLIGHTS

~ OPERATIONS SUPPORT

~ OPERATOR WORKAROUNDPROGRAM

~ PSA AND ON-LINEACTIVITIES

~ ABANDONED EQUIPMENT PROGRAM

~ CONTROL ROOM ENHANCEMENTS

~ MAINTENANCESUPPORT

, ~ CRANKINGDIESEL ELIMINATION 0 MAINTENANCESPECIFICATION PROGRAM

~ BILLOF MATERIALUPGRADE

~ INSTRUMENTAIR.COMPRESSORS

~ OUTAGE PERFORMANCE

~ PRE-OUTAGE PLANNING

~ OUTAGE SUPPORT

~ RISK ASSESSMENT TEAM

~ POST-OUTAGE SELF ASSESSMENT

~ EFFECTIVE ROOT CAUSE

~ CV-4-200A (LETDOWN ISOLATION)ACTUATOR BOLTING FAILURE

~ COOLING CANALGRASS INFLUX

~ MANAGINGENGINEERING WORKLOAD

~ INPO AUDITCITES STRENGTH IN WORK PRIORITIZATION

~ EFFECTIVE CONTROL OF BACKLOGS 33

ENGINEERING RELIABILITYIMPROVEMENTS

~ ON-LINE SECONDARY CHEMISTRY MONITORING

~ FLOW ACCELERATED CORROSION PROGRAM

~ "C" 4160V BUS IMPROVEMENTS

~ Relay Relocation

~ Welded Floor Plates

~ ROD CONTROL POWER SUPPLY UPGRADE

~ REFUELING EQUIPMENT TASKTEAM

~ INPO RECOGNIZED THERMALPERFORMANCE MONITORING PROGRAM

ENGINEERING INITIATIVES

~ IN-HOUSE CORE DESIGN

~ FUSE LIST ENHANCEMENTPROGRAM

~ 95/o complete

~ Complete by July 31 e SMALLBORE PIPING MODIFICATIONS

~ CONDITION REPORT TRENDING

~ CONTINUED PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

~ THERMALPOWER UPRATE

~ FSAR REVIEW SELF ASSESSMENT 35

FSAR OPERATIONS REVIEW

~ FSAR OPERATIONS REVIEW

. March 1995-96

~ INITIATEDBASED UPON RESIDENT INSPECTOR COMMENTS

~ CORRECT PROCEDURAL INACCURACIES

~ SCREENED FSAR FOR PROCEDURAL OR OPERATIONAL DESCRIPTION

~ INCLUDED LICENSED OPERATORS FOR CORRECTNESS

~ RESULTS

~ 45 COMMENTS

~ 19 - NO CHANGE REQUIRED

~ 18 - ADMINISTRATIVECHANGE OR MINOR

~ 8

- REQUIRED FSAR UPDATE TO REFLECT DESIGN OR PROCEDURE

~ 0

- REQUIRED PLANT OR PROCEDURE CHANGE

~ FSAR CHANGE PACKAGE AND 50.59'S TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE FALL1996 FSAR UPDATE

. FSAR SELF ASSESSMENT

~ FSAR SELF ASSESSMENT MARCH 1996

~ 75/o REVIEWED BY EXPERIENCED INDIVIDUALS

~ 96 COMMENTS I QUESTIONS GENERATED

~ 67 - NO CHANGE REQUIRED

~ 24 - ADMINISTRATIVECHANGE OR, MINOR

~ 5' REQUIRED FSAR UPDATE TO REFLECT DESIGN OR PROCEDURE

~ 0

- REQUIRED PLANTOR PROCEDURE CHANGE

~. CR ISSUED TO DOCUMENT COMMENTS

~ FSAR CHANGE PACKAGE AND 50.59 APPROVED ANDWILLBE INCORPORATED INTO FALL1996 UPDATE

~ CONTINUED FSAR ACCURACY REVIEW

~ CROSS DISCIPLINE/ DEPARTMENT REVIEW

~ WILLINCLUDEA ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS I996 37

FSAR IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED

~

INFORMATIONADDEDTO FSAR

~ REG. GUIDE 1.97 INSTRUMENTATION-

'NTERNALFLOODING-

'XTERNALFLOODING-

'IRE PROTECTION-S ATWS-SECTION 7.5 5

5 9.6A 7.2.4

~ MAJOR REWRITES / ENHANCEMENTS

~ EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEMS SECTIONS - 5.3, 8, 9.15, 9.16

~ POPULATION SECTION-2.4

~ SBLOCA SECTION-14.3.5

~ HYDROGEN CONTROL-9.12

~ CONTAINMENTISOLATION-6.6 38

FSAR MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS IN-PROG RESS

~ CHAPTER 3 REWRITE - FUEL DESIGN

~ NON-LOCA REANALYSIS 1996 1996 i REWRITE SECTION 14.1 5 14.2 FOR RTDP i MAJOR ACTIVITIESFOR THERMALUPRATE PROJECT

~ MAJOR REVIEW PERFORMED

~ REWRITE CHAPTER 14 - ACCIDENT ANALYSIS

~ CONTAINMENTANALYSIS 39

MAINTENANCERULE IMPLEMENTATION INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT

~ STRENGTHS

~ SYSTEM ENGINEERING INVOLVEMENTAND OWNERSHIP

~ ON-LINE MAINTENANCE-'OTH PROGRAMATICALLYAND IN CONTROL ROOM

~ KEY AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT

~ ENHANCE PROCEDURAL GUIDANCE AND DOCUMENTATIONFOR A(1) GOAL SETTING

~ PROVIDE BETI ER TIE BETWEEN SSC FUNCTIONS AND MAINT.RULE SCOPING CRITERIA, RISK SIGNIFICANCE, AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

~ OVERALLCONCLUSION

~ TURKEY POINT HAS TAKEN CONSERVATIVEAPPROACH TO IMPLEMENTATION

~ CLOSELY FOLLOWED NUMARC 93-01 o JULY 10, 1996 FULL IMPLEMENTATION 40

PLANT SUPPORT

PLANT SUPPORT HIGHLIGHTS

~ INSTALLATIONOF VEHICLE BARRIER SYSTEM (COMPLETE}

~ SUPPORT OF RECOVERY EFFORTS FOR VALUE-JET FLIGHT 592

. ~ POSTPONED EP DRILLWITH COUNTY

~ 'PROVIDED EQUIPMENT AND SUPPORT TO RECOVERY EFFORT

~ 19 LICENSED OPERATOR EXAMS SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 14, I996

~ 12 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENTOPERATION TRNG (SRO CERT.) AUG. 5, 1996

~ HOURS WORKED WITHOUTLOST TIME ACCIDENT

~ PREVIOUS RECORD:

> 9 MILLIONMAN-HOURS o CURRENTLY

> 4 MILLIONMAN-HOURS

~ SITE RECORDS FOR OSHA RECORDABLE AND MINOR INJURIES

~ 80 lo OF FIRE BRIGADE QUALIFIEDBY THE STATE OF FLORIDA AS CERTIFIED VOLUNTEER FIRE FIGHTERS.

42

PLANT SUPPORT SELF ASSESSMENT WEAKNESSES IDENTIFIEDAND ADDRESSED

~ Health Physics - High rad levels observed on aux building roof near transfer canal

~ Emerg. Preparedness

- More formal notification of NRC/FEMA of Race Track and AirShow

~ Fire Protection - Halon system failure

~ Security - Transfer of safeguards information inadequate

PLANT SUPPORT SELF ASSESSMENT STRENGTHS

~ Health Physics - Strong ALARAReview Board function

~ Health Physics - Strong entry controls for very high rad areas

~ Chemistry - Secondary chemistry program promotes unit reliability

~ Fire Protection - Fire brigade response timely

~

Protection - Fire brigade members certified through the State of Florida as volunteer fire fighters

~ Emerg. Preparedness

- Effective Emerg. Plan implementation as demonstrated by evaluated exercise

~ Emerg. Preparedness

- Hurricane preparation proactive

~ Security -Staff professionalism and knowledge

PLANT SUPPORT SELF ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES

~ MANAGEMENTOBSERVATION OF TRAININGACTIVITIES

~ OFF-HOURS MANAGEMENTTOURS

~ PLANT MANAGER'S WALKDOWNS

~ MANAGEMENTCLEANLINESS TOURS

~ PLANT TRAININGADVISORYBOARD

~

8 R ATION OF LICENSED OPERATOR SIMULATORPERFORMANCE

~ ORAL BOARDS FOR LICENSED OPERATOR CANDIDATES

~ ORAL BOARDS FOR SYSTEM ENGINEERS I

45

PLANTSUPPORT SELF ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES

~ INPO "MOCK".TEAM REVIEW OF TRAINING

~ DRILLS - NORMAUOFF HOURS

~ FIRE DRILLS

~ SECURITY

. ~ EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

~ HEALTH PHYSICS DRILLS

~ MEDICALDRILLS

~ PERIODIC REVIEWS OF PLANT PROCEDURES

~ CROSS CHECK OF CHEMISTRY SAMPLES WITH OUTSIDE LABS

~ SECURITY OFFICER TRAINING(FATS} FIRE ARMS TRAININGSYSTEM

SUMMARY

47

TURKEY POINT TODAY

~ UNIT PERFORMANCE IS GOOD AND IMPROVING

~ COMPLACENCY AVOIDANCE

~ BENCHMARKINGAGAINSTOTHER GOOD PERFORMERS

~ SHARING INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE

~ AGGRESSIVE SELF ASSESSMENT

~ RAISING THE BAR

~ TEAMWORK

TURKEY POINT SALP PERIOD

SUMMARY

~ Turkey Point activities have been properly focused on safety.

~ We believe our programs and procedures have provided effective controls.'

Turkey Point's self-assessment efforts have been effective in the identification of important issues.

e Our corrective actions are technically sound, comprehensive and thorough.

~ We resolve issues in a timely manner to prevent repeat problems.

~ Root cause analyses are thorough.

~ Turkey Point resources have been and continue to be effectively applied.

~ Turkey Point has achieved a superior level.

, of performance.

ltlOna U

ort n ormation 50

OPERATIONS STAFFING Licensed Operators TODAY 62 PROJECTED (07/31/96) 77 Nonlicensed Operators 51

U-3 AUTOMATICTRIP 2/9/96

~ ROOT CAUSE

~ The root cause of the event was cognitive personnel, error. The."C" SIG feedwater regulating valve was placed in automatic control and acceptable controlling performance was not verified.

~ CORRECTlVE ACTlONS 0 Remedial simulator training was conducted for the individual controlling the "C" S/G level.

~ The "C" SIG Row Control Valve performance in automatic was investigated.

The results of the investigation revealed no abnormalities with the "C" SIG flowcontrol valve.

o Operations management has reviewed this event with each operating crew.

Training willreview/establish scenarios which approximate this event.

Manual Trips 1994 Manual Trips

~ September

- Unit 4-Partial Loss of Rod Position Indicator 1995 Manual Trips

~ April - Unit 3 - Failed Rod Control Power Supplies

~

. October.- Unit 3 - Dropped Control Rods due to Wet Phase Control Card and Firing Card 1996 Manual Trips

~ March - Unit 3 - 3C Transformer Lockout and Loss of 38 Steam Generator Main Feedwater Pump

~ April-Unit 4-Turbine Governor Control Oil Perturbation 53

RADWASTE MINIMIZATIONPLAN-Strategic Task Team formed in 1994 to reduce generation of Radwaste.

Crossfunctional team, sponsored by Maintenance Manager Raised general plant awareness of Radwaste The plant is generating an average of <50 cubic feet per week, which reflects a 79% reduction in Radwaste volume.

Only 3 SeaVan shipments in 1995.

Total cost for 1995 SeaVan shipments was $450,000.00.

1995 cost savings of $3,000,000.00.

J Reduction techniques are now being applied to scaffolding and insulation.

54

Temporary System Alterations 6-5-96

~ Instrument Air Bypass Around SV- 069

~ 4B RCP Motor Remote Camera to Monitor Oil Level

~ Disable E9/4 Generator Exciter Air 55

PLANT CHANGE/MODIFICATIONS(PC/Ms) 1.,400 1,200..

1175 1039 1990 - 1996 (YTD) 1,000 O

800 R

600 0

400 798 544 498 200 0

255 109 106 82 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 QVARTER 56

MOST RECENT UNIT 3 AND UNIT 4 REFUELING OUTAGE GOALS AND RESULTS UNIT3 Goal Actual UNIT4 Goal Actual

1. Nuclear Safety

2. Personnel Safety

- Lost Time accident

3. Doctor Case Injury

4. Duration

5. Budget

6. Personnel Exposure

7. Personnel Contaminations

8. Contaminated Floor Space

9. Cubic Feet of Waste

10. Outage related Sign CRs

.0

<6

<40

<$24M 34 Days

$22M

<230 ManRem 175

<10

<1750 sqft

<500sqft

<6400 cbft 4150cuft

'I

<10 4

1. Nuclear Safety

2. Personnel Safety

- Lost Time accident

3. Doctor Case Injury

4. Duration

5. Budget

6. Personnel Exposure

7. Personnel Coritaminations

8. Contaminated Floor Space

9. Cubic Feet of Waste

10. Outage related Sign CRs

'<6

'40 35 Days

<$22.5M

$22.3M

<215 ManRem 158

<10

<10

<1750 sqft

<469sqft

<6400 cbft 2400cbft 57

CONTROL ROOM DEFICIENCY TAGS 5-6-96

> RECORDER INDICATIONFAILED LOW (R-3-320 PT-13)

> 3A1 TRAVELINGSCREEN READS 5" DELTA P WITH CIRC PUMP OFF

> RECORDER NOT PRINTING 4C RCP LOWER MOTOR OIL LEVELON "ERDADS" ABNORMAL

> P-6 STATUS LIGHT FLICKERS

> PRMS CHANNEL19 SPIKED ON RESET OF R11/12 ALARM

FSAR UPDATE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT

~ Eliminated A/E Involvement 1991

~ Converted to Electronic Word Processing

~ LAN Capability

~ FSAR on LAN

.i Word.search capability

~ Electronic update

~ Management Initiatives

~ Significant Reduction in Outstanding / In-Process Changes o 1,000 to (100

~ Package Close-out at End of Outage Partially Implemented Packages Eliminated

, ~ Abandoned Equipment Program 59

MAINTENANCE.RULE IMPLEMENTATION

~ SCOP ING AND RISK SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATIONCOMPLETED

~ APPROX. 70/o OF SSC'S ARE WITHINTHE SCOPE OF THE RULE

~ APPROX. 42/0 OF SSC's ARE CLASSIFIED AS RISK SIGNIFICANT.

~ ALLPROCEDURES COMPLETED AND ISSUED

~ QA,. IN-HOUSE, AND NEI ASSESSMENTS OF IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETED JAN. 1996

~ OUTSIDE CONTRACTOR ASSESSMENT PERFORMED IN MAY

. ~ PERFORMANCE CRITERIAAND PLANT HISTORY REVIEW COMPLETE

~ FIVE SCC'S CLASSIFIED AS A(1} - REQUIRES GOAL SETTING AND MONITORING

MAINTENANCERULE IMPLEMENTATION

~ 5 SSC's CLASSIFIED AS A(1) - REQUIRE GOAL SETTING AND MONITORING

~ 3B EDG

~ RD-3/4-11 (Containment Radiation Monitor)

~ POV-3-4882 (ICW/TPCW Hx isolation valve

~ 3-20-218 (3B FW discharge check valve)

~ CV-4-2908 (4C ECC outlet valve)

THERMALPOWER UP RATE

. ~ PROPOSED LICENSE AMENDMENTUNDER STAFF REVIEW

~ PLAN TO IMPLEMENTIN FALLOF 1996

~ MAJOR INITIATIVEWITH MANYBENEFITS FOR TURKEY POINT

~

~ IMPROVED DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTATION

~ UPDATED ACCIDENTANALYSES AND ANALYTICALTECHNIQUES

~ GREATER IN-HOUSE EXPERIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE

~ OPERATIONALFLEXIBILITYAND MARGIN

~ DETAILEDSELF ASSESSMENT OF DESIGN ATTRIBUTES OF THE PLANT

~ LOWER PRODUCTION COSTS WITHOUT REDUCING O&M EXPENDITURES

~ SELF-IDENTIFICATION.OF PROBLEMS AND PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

~ UNIT 4 CCW PIPING STRESS ANALYSISERROR

~ CCW MAXIMUMSAFEGUARDS FLOW NOT FULLYADDRESSED IN ANALYSES

Thermo-Lag issUe Overview o Compensatory measures in place o Smoke detectors and roving fire watch o Video camera detection installed outdoors INDOOR

~ Upgrade to be complete by end of 1998 Circuit by circuit review - 1995

~ Material selection and engineering -1996

~ Phase I - Upgrade by use of overlay o Phase II - Plant Modifications where overlay is not practical

Thermo-Lag Issue Overview OUTDOOR e Turkey Point unique - >90% outdoors I Reviewed actual installation with NRC (4/96}

'esting does not reflect outdoor conditions No trapped hot gases No combustibles e Consistent with containment installations

'- Current installed design adequate for outdoors

MAINTENANCESP ECIFICATIONS.

~.PURPOSE

~ ESTABLISHES STANDARDS FOR REPETITIVE WORK TASK

~ INCORPORATES EFFICIENT METHOD FOR REAL TIME INPUT

~ BENEFITS.

o FACILITATESJOB PLANNING

~ REDUCES OR ELIMINATESTURNAROUNDTIMETO OBTAIN ENGINEERING INPUT

~ PROVIDES A PROCESS FOR APPROVAL OF MINOR DEVIATIONS FROM THE STANDARD o ALLOWS BETTER USE OF ENGINEERING RESOURCES

~ RECENT SPECIFICATION EXAMPLES

~ LARGE BORE PIPE SUPPORTS

~ GUIDELINES FOR TEMPORARY PERSONNEL LOADINGON SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT

~ INSTALLATION,INSPECTION ANDTESTING OF ELECTRICAL CABLE AND OPTICAL FIBER

~ CROSSUNDER PIPING INSPECTIONS AND REPAIRS

GRASS INTRUSION INTO UNITS 3 & 4 INTAKE

- March 1995

~ Degraded deflector plates on screen wash/debris carry over

- Replaced all deflector plates (one bay Belzona Ceramic coated)

~ Developed ONOP -011 (Screen Wash System/Intake Malfunction)

- High delta P

- Start screen wash based upon Land U notification

.- Run screen in fast speed I

- January 1996 Maintenance on 3A1 traveling screen in progress/debris carry over Belzona Ceramic on all deflector plates

- Additional skimmer pumps and booms in canals

- Daily canal patrols Wide range DP gauges installed on strainers 66

GRASS INTRUSION INTO UNITS 3 & 4 INTAKE

- February 1996

~ Difficultydetermining which strainer to clean

- ".Flow through" of fine material through traveling screens

~ Flow terminated to trash pit

'ebris baskets placed in.upper weir pit

~ Screen wash effluent flow routed to discharge canal 67

GRASS INTRUSION Current initiatives

~

. Evaluate alternative means of screen wash effluent disposal

~ Evaluate alternate screen geometry, size, and material for the traveling screen trays

~ Evaluate benefit of adding additional spray headers to traveling screens

~ Evaluate rriethod of more accurately determining strainer DPs 68

GRASS INTRUSION Summar

~ All "low flow".events have been associated with Unit 3 (3A1 and 3A2 bays)

~ Canal maintenance program found to be appropriate

~ Procedures have been developed for offnormal ICW events

~ Component changes are being reviewed for benefit

~ En'vironmental data review continues to establish predictive capability

~ Canal maintenance origoing in order to reduce grass influx 69

BILLOF MATERIALS(BOM) UPGRADE ce C

o O

E

¹o CO c8

¹6 Ul O

¹I K

eoo 800 400 000 900 000 Hl o f M a te ria ls Upgrade Progress IseaeeaeTotal Tag ¹s (¹ A ssoc.)

~Completed Tag ¹s To Ste

-Fb Jec ted Tag ¹ s to be Com pleted 0

6 2

Dec Feb 19-17-A pr May Ste 14-31-Jun Oct

~ The purpose of this activity is to develop an accurate Billof Materials for select systems which accurately reflects the installed primary component and associates.

~ Systems selected were an integral part of existing Five Year Plan, Preventive Main-maintenance enhancement program, and Maintenance Rule implementation.

~ Completion of this task willsignificantly increase planning efficiency.

70

AUXILIARYFEEDWATER

~ AUX-FEEDWATERTRIP AFTER REACTOR TRIP DUE TO BINDINGOF GOVERNOR VALVESTEM DURING SHUT DOWN OF PUMP

~ ROOT CAUSE IDENTIFIEDAS EXTERNALCORROSION RESULTING IN BINDINGOF GOVERNOR VALVESTEM o REQUIRE GOVERNOR VALVEINSPECTION AND OVERHAUL

. EVERY 5 YEARS

~ CORROSION REDUCTION MEASURES IMPLEMENTEDPURSUANT TO IN 94-66

~ PULL TESTING ON GOVERNOR VAlVESTEMS IMPLEMENTED

~ "8" AND" C" AUXILIARYFEEDWATER GOVERNOR STEMS REPLACED WITH INCONEL 718 {"A"PUMP SCHEDULED IN JULY 1996}

FUSE LlST ENHANCEMENTPROGRAM 5,000

~ 4,000

~ 2R+ 3,000 tx.')

2,000 0)D~ 1,000 4411 MQNTHLYSTATUS

~ ~

8...

""e -....

PROJECTEP

~ 8 ACTUAL 650 04/95 e/95 8/95 10/95 12/95 MONTHS

~y

~ y ~y

~g

~ y

~y

~ y

~gi 2/se 4/se else 72

CV-4-200A (LETDOWN ISOLATION)

~ OPERABILITYDETERMINATION

~ 200A STILLOPERABLE

~ FAlLS TO SAFE/CLOSED POSITION

~ ROOT CAUSE

~ HIGH CYCLE FATIGUE DUE TO AIR SYSTEM FLUCTUATIONS (INITIALCONCLUSION) o CORROSIONCOMPONENT FATIGUEMECHANISM FOUND

~: CORRECTIVE ACTION

~ HIGH STRENGTH BOLTINGMATERIAI UPGRADE

~ NEW AIR REGULATOR INSTALLEDTO REDUCE FLUCTUATIONS

~.

~ GENERIC IIVlPI ICATIONS

~ FUTURE INSPECTION OF OTHER CV-200'S ANDSIMILARSERVICE -VALVES SCHEDULED

~ NO OTHER VALVEEXHIBITFATIGUE DAMAGEINITIATION 73

Minor Injuries 1995 to 1996 140 120 100 a) 80 60 1996 40 20 0

2 3

4 5

6 7

Month 8

9 10 11 12 74

Recordable Injuries 1995 to 1996 25 20

,.15 10 1995 1996 0

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

10 12 75

REPORTABLE EVENTS 50 1989 - 1996 YTD 40..

37.

(Q

~ 30 26 Ct UJ~ 20 10 0

24 1.2 0

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 Year 1994 1995 1996 76

CHEMISTRY

- Submitted revised ODCM to support removal of RETS

- Replaced all W SlG tube plugs in Unit 4 and all hot leg plugs in Unit 3

- Completed a self assessment of Chemistry work controls I

- Began recycling mercury lamps

- Implemented secondary chemistry Database and Tracking System

- Implemented PCIM to maximize CVCS demineralizer efficiency

- Obtained permits and proceduralized grass shipments to waste dump 77

CHEMISTRY.

~ One of the lowest CPI Values in the industry

~ New Secondary Chemistry On-line Monitoring and Analysis Facilities

~ Weekly high-volume blowdown to optimize chemistry performance

~ Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant

~ Steam Generator sludge lancing with high volume bundle flushing

<<100/o Eddy Current Testing

- Replaced all W S/G tube plugs in Unit 4 and all hot leg plugs in Unit 3 78

UNIT3 S/G TUBE PLUG HISTORY STEAM GENERATOR PRESERVICE PLUGS PREVIOUS OUTAGES TUBES PLUGGED 9/95*

TOTALTUBES PLUGGED 13 0

17 9

18 19 14

• RESULTS OF LATEST OUTAGE

'00%

ECT OF ALLTUBES'214 TUBES PER STEAM GENERATOR UNIT3 STEAM GENERATORS IN SERVICE 2/82 79

UNIT4 S/G TUBE PLUG HISTORY STEAM GENERATOR C

PRESERVICE PLUGS PREVIOUS OUTAGES TUBES PLUGGED 4/96*

TOTALTUBES PLUGGED 15 16

• RESULTS OF LATEST OUTAGE 100% OF ALLWESTINGHOUSE MECHANICALPLUGS REPLACED UNIT4 STEAM GENERATORS IN SERVICE 2/83 80

LICENSING ACTIVITIES

~ License Amendments

- Rod Position Indication to Group Step Counter Deviation

- RPS / ESFAS (Approved)

~ On-line Surveillance Interval Extensions (Generic Letter 93-05)

~ Emergency Diesel Generator Technical Specifications (Approved)

- Load Sequencer Technical Specification (Pending)

I

~ Rad-Effluent T.S. Removal

~ Relocation of Movable incore Detectors

-'Appendix J Option B Application (Pending)

~ Thermal Uprate Project

. - SBLOCA/ COSI Methodology and Analysis

- RTDP (Approved)

>> LBLOCAModel Revision

~ Technical Specification BASES Improvements 81

SECURITY

~ Installation of Vehicle Barrier System (Complete)

~ Security force members instructor certified on Use of Non-deadly Force"

~ Excellent relations with Local Law Enforcement Agencies (LLEAs)

- Metro Dade police performed SWAT drill with security force

- FDLE using training facilities for Olympic preparations

> Maintain double intrusion detection system

~ Only one computer outage during the SALP period 82

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

~ Support recovery efforts for Value-Jet Flight 592

~ Postponed EP drill with County

> Provided equipment and support to recovery effort

<<.Developed and implemented pre-hurricane season procedure

~ SAMG training underway

~ Implementation of new state phone system (ESATCOM)

~ Hurricane preparations complete 83

TRAINING

~ RO/SRO license requalification exams February 1995; 100% passed

~ Maint. and Tech. Training Programs Re-accredited Dec. 1995

~ License Operations Training - NRC Exam June 1996

- 4 Senior Reactor Operator Upgrades,

- 2 Senior Reactor Operator Management

- 1 instant Senior Reactor Operator

- 12 Reactor Operators

<<8 Nuclear Management Operations Training (SRO Cert.) completed June 1995.

'I

<<12 Nuclear Management Operation Training (SRO Cert.) Scheduled August l 996

<<10 Non-Licensed Operator Training (SNPO)

<<Senior Reactor Operator Upgrade Prpgram Scheduled August 1996

1996 STRATEGIC TASK TEAMS M

n r

PTN WORK PROCESS REVIEW 2.

LONG TERM OUTAGE STRATEGY 3.

MULTI-FUNCTIONWORKERS 4.

NRC COMMITMENTMANAGEMENT 5.

EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT 6..

MORE "PAPERLESS" PLANT 7.

PROCEDURE REDUCTION R. J. Hovey R. J. Hovey D. E. Jernigan V. A. Kaminskas R. B. Marshall J. R. Hartzog R. E. Rose J. R. Hartzog P. C. Higgins R. G, Heisterman C. L. Mowrey G. E. Hollinger H. H. Johnson E. Lyons 85

OPERATOR WORK AROUNDS 40 30 30 20 10 0

TOTAL ITEMS IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETE EVALUATION UNDERWAY AWAITING IMPLEMENTATION 86

ABANDONEDEQUIPMENT TASK TEAM 30 25 27 24 15 10 0

TOTAL COMPLETE POPULATION (THRU PNSC) 0 ENGINEERING AWAITING IMPLEMENTATION

. WORKING PNSC COMPLETE 87

p.> +~ i~ ~ ~ '

- ~

~ - n- ~: i.q p.i.~ ~ <

naca@.

q ~la g t ~ ~

s ceePra OeS'tOae

~~ <ii Ai'ii'Q 0 v i%ia sfi kt1 I-o 0 p-ZiVA4'SCAB

ea

~

'll