ML17353A401
| ML17353A401 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 09/29/1995 |
| From: | Croteau R NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Goldberg J FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17353A402 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-M82732, NUDOCS 9510160146 | |
| Download: ML17353A401 (6) | |
Text
pe REOy d
+
P0 Cy Cl
'd' O
Vl0
~O
+**++
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 2055&0001 September 29>
1995 Mr. J.
H. Goldberg President Nuclear Division Florida Power and Light Company P.O.
Box 14000 Juno
- Beach, Florida 33408-0420
SUBJECT:
TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 AND 4 TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT REGARDING THE OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCH),
REVISION 4 (TAC NOs H82732 AND H82733)
Dear Hr. Goldberg:
We have competed our review of the Turkey Point ODCH, Revision 4.
The overall evaluation is that Revision 4 of the Turkey Point Plant ODCH uses documented and approved methods that are consistent with the methodology and guidance of NRC documents.
However, the Technical Findings section of the enclosed Technical Evaluation Report (TER) identifies 15 primary deficiencies, 14 secondary deficiencies, and 5 areas with omissions or editorial mistakes.
These findings range in seriousness from omissions that cause uncertainty about the methodology used in the ODCM to the lack of sample calculations.
The enclosed TER was prepared for the NRC by the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) in partial fulfillment of the "Review of Radiological Issues" project for NRR.
The objective of this TER is to evaluate how well the Turkey Point Plant ODCH conforms with the methodology and guidance of the following NRC documents:
~
NUREG-1301, "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance:
Standard Radiological Effluent Controls for Pressurized Water Reactors"
~
NUREG-0133, "Preparation of RETS for Nuclear Power Plants"
~
Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I" The NRC considers that the ODCH should be a stand-alone document.
It should contain all the necessary information (equations, definitions, sample calculations) to permit an NRC inspector to duplicate calculations used by the licensee to demonstrate conformance with the regulations related to radioactive effluents.
Therefore, many of the findings suggest that the ODCH should be revised to (1) discuss the methodology and the reasons for using this methodology for calculating certain values; (2) provide the bases for the use of certain equations; and (3) include the use of more recent data.
95iOi60146 950920 PDR,'DQCK,05000250 PDR
s P
I
Hr. Goldberg. September 29, 1995 The enclosed TER is based on Revision 4 of the Turkey Point Plant ODCH.
Because you have issued subsequent revisions to the ODCH since the TER was
- prepared, some of the comments and suggestions contained in the attached TER may no longer be applicable.
- However, we suggest that you review the TER comments against the most recent version of the Turkey Point Plant ODCH and incorporate all suggested changes into the next revision of the ODCH.
No response to this letter is requested.
Sincerely, (Original Signed By)
Richard P. Croteau, Project Hanager Project Directorate II-1 Division of Reactor Projects I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos.
50-250 and 50-251
Enclosure:
as stated cc:
See next page Document Name:
G:
TURKEY TP ODCH.LTR Distribution Docket File PUBLIC PD2-1 RF SVarga JZwolinski OGC ACRS (4)
KLandis, RII REmch OFFICE LA:PD II-1 PH:PDII-1 NAHE DATE Dunnin tong<
09.
95 RCroteah DHatthews 09 95 09 5
COPY es No Yes No Yes No
~~ c c., OFFICIAL RE RD COPY
f h
I Hr. Goldberg The enclosed TER is based on Revision 4 of the Turkey Point Plant ODCH.
Because you have issued subsequent revisions to the ODCH since the TER was
- prepared, some of the comments and suggestions contained in the attached TER may no longer be applicable.
- However, we suggest that you review the TER comments against the most recent version of the Turkey Point Plant ODCH and incorporate all suggested:
changes into the next revision of the ODCH.
No response to this letter is requested.
Sincerely, Docket Nos.
50-250 and 50-251
Enclosure:
as stated cc:
See next page Richard P. Croteau, Project Hanager Project Directorate II-1 Division of Reactor Projects I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Hr. J.
H. Goldberg Florida Power and Light Company Turkey Point Plant CC:
J.
R.
- Newman, Esquire
- Morgan, Lewis
& Bockius 1800 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036 Jack Shreve, Public Counsel Office of the Public Counsel c/o The Florida Legislature 111 West Madison Avenue, Room 812 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1400 John T. Butler, Esquire
- Steel, Hector and Davis 4000 Southeast Financial Center Miami, Flor ida 33131-2398 Hr. Thomas F. Plunkett, Site Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power and Light Company P.O.
Box 029100 Miami, Florida 33102 Joaquin Avino County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County ill NW 1st Street, 29th Floor Miami, Florida 33128 Senior Resident Inspector Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O.
Box 1448 Homestead, Florida 33090 Hr. Bill Passetti Office of Radiation Control Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1317 Winewood Blvd.
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 Hr. Joe Hyers, Director Division of Emergency Preparedness Department of Community Affairs 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, N.W. Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs The Capitol Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Plant Manager Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power and Light Company P. 0.
Box 029100 Miami, Florida 33102 Hr. H.N. Paduano, Manager Licensing 8 Special Programs Florida Power and Light Company P.O.
Box 14000 Juno
- Beach, Florida 33408-0420 Hr. Edward J.
Weinkam Licensing Manager Turkey Point Nuclear Plant P.O.
Box 4332 Princeton, Florida 33023-4332