ML17349A310

Summary of 920707 Meeting W/Util in Rockville,Md Re Current Status & Plans for Plants.Handout Encl

ML17349A310
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	07/21/1992
From:	Raghavan L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 9207240151
Download: ML17349A310 (38)

Text

4

\\

July 21, 1992 Docket Nos.

50-250 and 50-251 LICENSEE:

Florida Power and Light Company FACILITY:

Turkey Point, Units 3

& 4

SUMMARY

OF JULY 7, 1992 MEETING In its presentation, Florida Power and Light Company (FPL) discussed the current status, and future directions and plans for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4.

Enclosed is a copy of handout provided in the meeting.

Significantly, FPL indicated that there is a steady annual growth in demand for electricity in the area (approximately 3%)

and that they are currently buying approximately 2500 HWt from outside sources.

(Original Signed by)

L. Raghavan, Acting Project Manager Project Directorate II-2 Division of Reactor Projects I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

Handout cc w/enclosure:

See next page DISTRIBUTION

,Docket File---.

NRC

& Local PDRs PDII-2 RF T. Hurley/F. Miraglia J. Partlow S. Varga G. Lainas L. Raghavan H. Berkow D. Miller E. Jordan, MNBB, 3701 H. Sinkule, RII OGC ACRS (10)

LA:PDI I-2 Pjj:PDII-26 Hiller LRaghavan:kdj

/P,O/92 q

P ) /92 Document Name TP.NTS J. Wechselberger, 17-G-21 J. Taylor, 17-G-21 D:

HB rkow

//g//92 On July 7, 1992, the Turkey Point Site Vice President, Hr. T. Plunkett and the Site Licensing Manager, Hr.

E.

Weinkam met with Hr. Taylor, Dr. Hurley and other NRC senior management staff at their offices in Rockville, Maryland.

The discussions were general in nature and did not result in specific action items.

'Ij207240151

'2j20721 PDR ADOCK 05000250

'P PDR IIM2/IP jj"D<jj'j~<r(jP>~C IP~PjjnjI

Florida Power and Light Company Turkey Point Plant CC:

Harold F. Reis, Esquire Newman and Holtzinger, P.C.

1615 L Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20036 Jack Shreve, Public Counsel Office of the Public Counsel c/o The Florida Legislature 111 West Madison Avenue, Room 812 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1400 John T. Butler, Esquire

Steel, Hector and Davis 4000 Southeast Financial Center Miami, Florida 33131-2398 Mr. Thomas F. Plunkett, Site Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power and Light Company P.O.

Box 029100 Miami, Florida 33102 Joaquin Avino County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County 111 NW 1st Street, 29th Floor Miami, Florida 33128 Senior Resident Inspector Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station U,S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O.

Box 1448 Homestead, Florida 33090 Mr. Jacob Daniel Nash Office of Radiation Control Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1317 Winewood Blvd.

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 Mr. Robert G. Nave, Director Emergency Management Department of Community Affairs 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 T

Administrator Department of Environmental Regulation Power Plant Siting Section State of Florida 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Regional Administrator, Region II

. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, N.W. Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs The Capitol Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Plant Manager Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power and Light Company P.O.

Box 029100 Miami, Florida 33102 Mr. R.

E. Grazio Director, Nuclear Licensing Florida Power and Light Company P.O.

Box 14000 Juno

Beach, Florida 33408-0420 Mr. J.

H. Goldberg President Nuclear Division Florida Power and Light Company P.O.

Box 14000 Juno

Beach, Florida 33408-0420

POINT NUCLXMtPLANT ADDD FLOKH)APOWER Ei; LIGHT PRESENTATION TO NRC MANAGEMENT WHITE %'LXNT,MARYLAND eH3LY 7, 1992

Pacae Florida Power 6 Light Fact Sheet Florida Power 6 Light Organization Aerial Overview of Turkey Point Close-Up of Turkey Point Turkey Point History Capital and OGM History Dual Unit Outage Summary Quality Program Human Resources Overtime Engineering Support Drawing Update and NCR Summary Operator Licensing Performance Corrective Maintenance MOV Failure Analysis Chemistry Performance Index Personnel Exposure Contaminations SALP History Benchmarking Turkey Point Strategic Planning Changes In Turkey Point Culture Turkey Point Tomorrow 9

10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

l

Florida Power and Light Company Fact Sheet (Based upon 1991 year-end statistics) 3.30-CUSTOMER GROWTH (m tllions)

FIVE YEAR 9(CREASE e 1 7%

ENERGY MIX FORCAST

()torso nt) 3.10 3.00 2JIO -2 2.70

'86

'87

'88

'89

'91 Prt.".h.

Power Coal Gas Oil Nuclear axe'",

',,tss:

4?k~j.':

ce

'91 i5;>:,

.ie$.

gee:~k;.

t,"

'I;rojA;

.<e 'A',Y>

roreoo

'93 2a FPL Capacity Resources A.

B.

C.

0.

E.

F.

G.

H.

lt)

J.

K.

L.

M. (2)

N. (3)

Total Nemo Mwso FC Meyers Tceeot Pore Corer Pon 2veitteeee Avrero Ptretoio StJcnns Aver Senorr Pvicneeoa Poser poeten0 tees tooct Mwaere ont Units capacity (mocawatts) 274 1,1 42 140 2.544 t,442 Set 1 4.702 Energy Usage

~ Total usage (all customers)

................ 67.6 Bill)on kwh

~ Growth ln usage (above 1990)....,..........................,3.0%

~ Avg. annual res)dentist usage (and cost per kwh)

I 1991.................12,083 kwh (82 cents)

I 1990............11,955 kwh (8.0) cents

~ 1991 peak load (~lnute nel)

I Winter (Feb. 16,1991)....,...~.................11,868 mw I Summer (Aug. 12, 1991)..... ~~............... 14,123 mw I AIHlmesystem peak (Aug. 12, 1991). 14,123 mw (1) FPI. overt 1 00% d Unt ond 42% ol uvt 2 (21 FP(. orms 20% d too 424 MWtrnrte (2) tet ploce d Tati tericnoeo d aca MwUnt 4

CHAIRMANAND CEO BROADHEAD PRESIDENT, NUC GOLDBERG PRESIDENT AND COO FRANK VP QNQC GEIGER VP ENG.

BOHLKE VP ST. LUCIE SAGER VP TURKEY POINT PLUNKETT LANTMANAGER HUMAN RESOURCES LICENSING ENGINEERING SERVICES MANAGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS TECH STAFF OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE OUTAGE

SAFETY, HAZ MAT FIRE PROTECTION SECURITY EMERGENCY PLANNING MATERIALS TRAINING I

I I

I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

V l

wp

r

~

~

~ ir '~

~

~ ~'~

~

p1~

~ Q P

~

~

>o pf'rX r,

dr 'W I

wr,,

i g,~ Q~r~

a

"~z

~ ~

~

Jt'~

C~+e.

4 X~Qggg,...

- ~("

4 r

'lp Qe 4

gC ~

4 4

I

~a~ ~

r'

g f<

RR~

i'

~

iS cubi

~

y

~ q l

)

,ig,

%04~~I

~

c Cl

TURKEY POINT HISTORY

~ Westinghouse 3-loop PWR

~

666 MW each of two units

~

Unit 3 - 11/22/72

~

Unit 4 - 6/21/73 BACKGROUND

~ February 1990 - Off NRC's "watch list"

~ Fall 1990 - Longest dual unit run - 107 days

~ November 1990- Dual unit outage start

~ January - April1990- Staffing analysis

~ October 1991 - Dual unit outage end FALL1990

~ Strong Nuclear Division President

~ Five site VPs In six years

~ Strong Plant Manager (4 months In job)

~ Absenteeism double FPL fossil units

~ Training programs strong

~ Major reliance on long term contractors

~ Strong desire to improve

TURKEY POINT CAPITALINVESTMENT 300 250 Initial lqvystment

$205 Milhon ual Unit utage

~200 (D

O~

~ 100 50

!nitial nvestment team enerators acilities 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 130 TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR OKM 125 (Dc:120 0 115 W 110

~105

+1OO 0

95 90 24 1989 16 1990 1991 1992 Budget 1993 Forecast 1

w g5

DUALUNIT OUTAGE

$258 MillionCost i NOVEMBER 24, 't990- OCTOBER 29, 1991

~ MAJOR OUTAGE WORK

~ Install 2 New Emergency Diesel Generators

~ Upgrade Exisiting Generators

~ Separate Plant Emergency Electrical System

~ Construct Security Entrance Building

~ Install Vital Area Barriers, Microwave and CCTV, Intrusion Detection Etc.

~ RTD Bypass Loop Elimination

~ Refuel Unit 4

~ Over 4000 Additional Tasks

~ Completed 6 Days Ahead of Schedule

~ Completed 3% Under Budget

~ MAJOR SUCCESS FOR TURKEY PO)NT EMPLOYEES

~ STRONG TEAMWORKEXHIBITED

~

Good Programs in Place

~

Aggressive and Proactive Quality Leadership

~

QA Manager Invited to All Management Meetings QA "Part of the Team" Some Attitude Tweaking Needed Reduce Backlog of Responses Managers Required to Attend QA Exits

eJ ii,

HUMAN RESOURCES LONG TERM GAME PLAN

~

Reduce Contractors

~

Reduce FPL Turkey Point Staff January 1991:

920 FPL 684 Long Term Contractors 1604 Today 858 FPL 222 Long Term Contractors 1080 AVERAGE NUMBER OF ABSENCES PER EMPLOYEE Exempt, Non-Exempt, Bargaining Unit 10 6$~ 7.5 0

Lw 5

O)

G$~ 2.5 Jan 91 (8<<47)

~

~ m <<gg m m mg 0

~ ~ ~

<<0g << ~ ~ ~ ~ age

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ eg Human Resources

~ Personnel Turnover

~ Monitoring Sick Leave

~ Implementation of VP Luncheon

~ Performance Awards

~ Fitness Center

~ "Winner" Attitude FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1992 Bargaining Unit Non-Exempt Exempt

~ w Q%

~ ~ ~ <<Q<<

~ ~ ~

ur e oint vertime Pere 35 ent Overtime 1987 t0 1992 30 25 7

25 20

'20 19

'f5 10 1 987 1988 1989 Year 1990 1991 13.4:

(Projected Year.End) 1992

... nv

'I

'A X~.

A RCW; H EBuslnesshOdh4Hlsloty pre

ENGINEERlNG SUPPORT TO TURKEY POlNT NUCLEAR ENGINEERING SITE ENGINEERING PRODUCTION ENGINEERING STAFF AND ESI DESIGN ENGINEERING ENGINEERS 28, VACANT 4

ADMINISTRATIVE 4

P.E.G. ENGINEERING ENGINEERS VACANT ADMINISTRATIVE 50 0

3 APPROXIMATELY70 SUPPORT PROGRAMS.

RESOURCES DIRECTED TO TURKEY POINT, AS REQUIRED.

PROCUREMENT ENGINEERS VACANT ADMINISTRATIVE 16 3

2 OUTSIDE CONTR. MGMT.

ENGINEERS 4

VACANT 0

ADMINISTRATIVE 1

=.NGINEERS VACANT ADMINISTRATIVE 64 3

3 TOTAI 5?

TOTAL 58 TOTAL: AS REQUIRED TO SUPPORT PLANT PROGRAMS.

GRAND TOTAL: 115 DIRECT TURKEY POINT SUPPORT STAFF

TURKEY POINT ENGINEERING CO 30000 DRAWING UPDATE PROGRAM 0

(3 U

25000 20000 15000 Feb. 1989 - 28000 Items Added Scope From Dual Unit Outage Updates Plant Operating Owgs At Turnover Control Room Owgs c 30 Days Mainlenance Dwgs c 60 Days Engineering Owgs c 90 Days Gz I-I-0 10000 5000 350 300 CC 250 Uz 200 0

Ct UJ 150 CQ z 100 50 ProIected I

I IWl-

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

I

~

I

~

~ ~ ~ ~ o J o ~

~

I I

TOTALNCRs IN JPN I

I I

OUAI.WITOUTAG8~

I I

~ I

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

I I

I I

I I

I I

r

~ ~

~ ~ t

~ ~ 0 ~ 0 19 2.89 6.89 12-89 6.90 12.90 6.91 12.91 6.92 12.92 6-93 12.93 NCR

SUMMARY

JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV JAN MAR MAY 1990 1991 1992 12

T RKEY P INT PRA PRA APPLICATIONS IN DAILYWORK

~ PROGRAMATICAPPLICATIONS

~ QUARTERLYMAINTENANCEREVIEW-INPO GOOD PRACTICE

~ ISEG REVIEW OF IMPORTANTPRA SEQUENCES

~ DESIGN PROCESS APPLICATIONS

~ DESIGNS IN PROGRESS REVIEWED FOR PRA IMPS.~T

~ INSTRUMENTAIR STUDY - DESIGN OPTIONS REVIEW

~ SPECIAL STUD)ES

~ INSIGHTS TO ON-LINEMAINTENANCE

~ SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE OF IDENTIFIEDPROBLEMS

- MSIVNITROGEN VALVEMISPOSITION

~ SEQUENCER TEST INTERVALOPTIMIZATION

Operator Licensing Performance NRC 1N1TlhLL1CBNSE BXhKRESULTS L1CENSED OPERhTOR hNNUhLREQUhL EXhM RESULTS llte>> 0>>e bsyel ~

IItvo kale lveel ~

f

~OOO 0000 nleeCI I tsw

~s>> I0 Osess0ll Osessyll lkllosses0III Odebet till Odeher ICI0 twwtg ICII Ocher Itll Ayel &R Ilose<<>>

IIosen>>

4 Iesess>>

Illose<<>>

llesess>>

III0 0tsl If%

~I~ 0 llo sl Ittl

~sin

<> 0s>> 00 0sns>>0 0te>> 0ee lnSaW ate>>~I>>0 NRC SRO UPORhDE EXAMRESULTS

% toss e<<o lvlol ~--n QACCII f

CICIC I

~

CKl0 CIO0 CION 0

~

~

CICl0 I loose>>e>>

esesn et live I>>eessse ee4<<eeoc I>>ossses 0e0 0esssooo Onoeet IIII

250 TURKEY POINT CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE (0I-Z 200 I

150 Chz O

1OO CC W

5o Z',

214 5.87 5.01 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCEBACKLOG 2500 CL 2000 0

I-1500 0

1OOO K

soo 1050 6.89 692

MOV COMPONENT FAILURE ANALYSISREPORT C)

~8 LU Ct 07 Z 6 I

UJ z'.0 CL O

(Q 3 LLI CCa2 LL I

1987 1988 1989 Turkey Point Industry o

~ ~

~a ~ ~0 4a ~

1990 1991

TURKEY POINT CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 0.7 0.6 Avg. S/6 Na.

Avg. S/G Cat. Cond Cnds. Diss. 02 20.,

0.8 20

~

'.5 04 O

0.3 0.2 0.1 0

PLY 1088 BAY 1080 TIME BAY 19XI AX.Y 1991 UNIT3 UNIT4 INDUSTRY AVERAGE

TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 & 4 1992 PERSONNEL EXPOSURE 730 0

0 O

D o

,0"""

p,.

" p 250

...........- o""

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NPV DEC 1990 1991 1992 1992 CUMULATlVE CUMULATlVE CUMULATlVE PROJECTED Data Manager. J. D. Undaay Data Date: June 24, 1992 Chan Name; SE178 25 1992 AVERAGE MONTHLYEXPOSURE Dally Maintenance 4 Plant Operation 17.8 ifL8 18.8 10 6.7 Year ACTUAL.

1991 Data Manager.T. A Caveman Data Date: June 23. 1992 Chan Name: CA175 18

25.000 21783 TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 & 4 CONTAMINATEDFLOOR SPACE 22854 hOCOYww. Hyctoe

$.000l~Mac 1S.OOO 1O.OOO 9132 18773 unts~

CIAO@

11354 9198 6616 14157 860 Painang 1236 RadWaste 10159 7449 5 6l84 7436 6502 4785 6/89 10/89 2/90 8/90 10/90 2/91 8/91 10/91 2/92 6/92 8/89 12/89 4/90 8/90 1 2/90 4/91 8/91 12/91 4/92 TOTALCOHTAMlNATED GOAL Data Manager. J. A Ferguson Data Date: June 24, 1992 Chan Name: SF178 1992 PERSONNEL CONTAMINATIONS 214 i

I 150 0

F:

100 z0 0

0 0"

6 0

107 g.............. d

~------ 6 100 31 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1990 1991 1992 1992 CUMULATlVE CUMULATlVE CUMULATlVE GOAL 0

---

!5----~

~

Data Manager, R. M. S/own Data Date: June 24, 1992 Chat Name: SC176 19

~

C ~

-PF

Turke Point ALP Ratin s

1981 to19 1

2.6 2.4 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2

'.00 2.20 2.45

-:2.25 I.85 I.38 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991

)I

COMPARISON OF CURRENT SALP RATINGS BENCHMARKNUCLEAR PLANTS 3

cd CC Q

Qpj 2

cd 0

C)

C)

CD0 0

Q Top Quartile (Range 1.14 to 1A3) 2nd Quartile (Range 1.43 to 1.71) 3rd Quartile (Range 1.71 to 1.86) 4th Quartile (Range 1.86 to 2.14)

Turkey Point Ranks 5th Best for Overall SALP Among the PWR 79 Plants VYe Benchmark to.

St. Lucie Ranks 1st.

The Average SALP Rating for Plants in This Group Is 1.67

1 2

trate ic Plans

~ Improved Work Controls Reduced Outage Duration

~ Backlogs Reduction

~ Consolidated Reporting System

~ Material Condition Upgrade

~ Facilities Maintenance

~ Stores Inventory Control

~ Thermal Efficiency Enhancement

~ Plant/Construction Procedure Consolidation

4)

CHANGES IN TURKEY POINT CULTURE

~ Prudent Conservative Operations

~ Maintaining the Plant for the "Long Haul"

~ Accoutability for Actions

~ Strong Corrective Action.Program

~ Open Book Relationship With NRC

~ Formal Employee Concern Program

~ Detailed Team Planning of Activities

~ Proactive Ongoing Dialog With Press and Public

TURKEY POINT TOMORROW MAINTAININGTHE LICENSE RENEWAL OPTION

~ Capture the Construction Period

~ Completed Design Basis Reconstitution

~ Reactor Vessel Toughnes~

~ Developing an Economic Model

~ Follow Closely Industry Initiatives

~ Follow Closely Regulatory Initiatives