ML17348B421

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joint Proposed Transcript Corrections of the Oral Argument Held on November 30, 2017
ML17348B421
Person / Time
Site: River Bend Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/14/2017
From: Burdick S, Taylor W, Sherwin Turk
Entergy Services, Law Offices of Wallace L. Taylor, Morgan, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, NRC/OGC
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
50-458-LR, ASLBP 17-956-01-LR-BD01, RAS 54124
Download: ML17348B421 (6)


Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of:

ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.

(River Bend Station, Unit 1)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 50-458-LR December 14, 2017 JOINT PROPOSED CORRECTIONS TO THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON NOVEMBER 30, 2017 In accordance with 10 C.F.R. §§ 2.323(a) and 2.327(d), the participants in this proceeding, Entergy Operations, Inc., the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff, and Sierra Club, hereby jointly file their proposed corrections to the transcript of the oral argument on the admissibility of proposed Contentions 1, 2, and 3 that was held by teleconference on November 30, 2017, in the above-captioned docket. These corrections are necessary to either fix material errors in the transcript or to ensure that the transcript accurately reflects statements made during the oral argument. The participants respectfully request that the transcript be revised to incorporate the corrections identified in Appendix A hereto.

2 William B. Glew, Jr., Esq.

Entergy Services, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Phone: (914) 272-3360 Fax: (914) 272-3242 E-mail: wglew@entergy.com Respectfully submitted, Executed in Accord with 10 C.F.R. § 2.304(d)

Stephen J. Burdick, Esq.

Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20004 Phone: (202) 739-5059 Fax: (202) 739-3001 E-mail: stephen.burdick@morganlewis.com E-mail: kathryn.sutton@morganlewis.com Counsel for Entergy Operations, Inc.

Executed in Accord with 10 C.F.R. § 2.304(d)

Sherwin E. Turk, Esq.

Joe I. Gillespie III, Esq.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of General Counsel Mail Stop - O-14-A44 Washington, DC 20555 Phone: (301) 287-9194 E-mail: sherwin.turk@nrc.gov E-mail: joe.gillespie@nrc.gov Counsel for NRC Staff Executed in Accord with 10 C.F.R. § 2.304(d)

Wallace L. Taylor, Esq.

Law Offices of Wallace L. Taylor 118 3rd Ave. S.E., Suite 326 Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 Phone: (319) 366-2428 Fax: (319) 366-3886 E-mail: wtaylorlaw@aol.com Counsel for Sierra Club Dated in Washington, D.C.

this 14th day of December 2017.

APPENDIX A PROPOSED CORRECTIONS TO THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON NOVEMBER 30, 2017 (DOCKET NO. 50-458-LR)

Page Line(s)

Delete Insert 2

19 O-15D21 O-14-A44 2

21 415-4126 415-7000 6

14 arguing argument 6

21 Joseph Joe 6

25 Donohue Donoghue 8

24 to the 11 14 look looks 12 12 your advocation your abdication 12 12 an advocation an abdication 12 22 advocating abdicating 14 14 hasnt isnt 14 16 advocated abdicated 14 22 advocate abdicate 14 23 advocated abdicated 15 18 alternative alternatives 20 1

sites cites 28 2

acceptable susceptible 29 9-10 progression, because progression. Because 29 13-14 rule. Licensees rule, licensees 33 4

page 1 page 31 38 2

plan plant 44 11 against proposed against the proposed 46 14-15 the same thing as test a contention of 46 21 challenge challenged 46 22 2.209(f)(1)(6) 2.309(f)(1)(vi) 47 5

previous proposed 49 7

advocation abdication 49 11 advocation abdication 49 14 advocation abdication 51 2

contentions contention 51 9

competing conceding 52 8

that identified that are identified 52 15 Contention 2 is Contention 2 - - is 53 9-10 Louisiana and Sierra Club. You seem to have Louisiana, and Sierra Club seems to have 53 19 only a on a 54 21 compressor energy source compressed air energy storage 54 23 license, and license, and

2 55 19 its suggestions.

its suggestions.

59 5

3.5.2.2.1 3.5.2.2.2.1 59 6

3.5.2.2.3 3.5.2.2.2.3 59 14 as we explain, includes and as we explain, this includes 60 2

with Reaction for Aggregate from Reaction with Aggregate 61 1

then concrete then concrete 62 3

put in put it in 63 20 free saw freeze-thaw 64 8

B-141 B.1.41 64 12 GALL reports GALL report 65 5

Roman eleven F6 XI.S6 65 10-11 Roman eleven. F6-4 XI S6-4 68 20 still-expanding slow-expanding 70 15 as to builder admissibility 72 5

excessively explicitly 72 9

of fines applying 73 21 application applications 73 23 to the ER a supplement to the GEIS 74 1

guidance GEIS 74 2

guidance GEIS 74 3

relief to develop reason developed 74 8

reactions the action 74 11 guidance GEIS 74 13 with for 74 14 report reports 74 16 Likewise, echoes Likewise, it echoes 74 22 2.235 2.335 74 23 the full balance and explaining the 74 25 for renewal of the rule or 75 1

did not give a would not serve the 75 5

the one is that one 75 8

Lucy Busey 75 9

staffs page 7 its reply to the staff on page 7 75 10 to the case 75 13 29 28 75 19 Lucy Busey 75 24 blunt input 75 25 redaction action 76 4

scope GEIS 76 5

Its It does 76 22 review resource 76 25 review resource 77 4

review resource 77 6

review resource 78 6

workforce of course

3 78 12 since letting addressing 79 2

stress solar 79 7

or placement hours for within as a replacement source for River Bend 79 18 2.09(F)(1)(5) and (6) 2.309(f)(1)(v) or (vi) 80 1

drywall drywell 80 2

F(1)(6)

(f)(1)(vi) 80 4

petition, must application, it must 80 10 The petition -- given petition The petitioner hasnt given in the petition 80 13-14 assumption. Categorically, assumption that, categorically, 80 20 admission contention 81 4

vitiates that the vitiates the 81 7

2.09(c) 2.309(c) 81 13-14 the materials --

a material dispute --

86 5

B-141 B.1.41 86 10 B-141 B.1.41 86 15 B-141 B.1.41 86 19 is of of 87 10 F(5), F(6)

XI.S6 87 13 50 Part 50 90 15 an in its 90 21 first first step 93 19 the initiatives under theres new information on the 94 25 3.5.2.2.1 3.5.2.2.2.1

DB1/ 94702039 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of:

ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.

(River Bend Station, Unit 1)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 50-458-LR December 14, 2017 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.305, I certify that, on this date, a copy of the foregoing Joint Proposed Corrections to the Transcript of the Oral Argument Held on November 30, 2017 was filed through the Electronic Information Exchange (the NRCs E-Filing System) in the above-captioned docket.

Signed (electronically) by Stephen J. Burdick Stephen J. Burdick, Esq.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20004 Phone: (202) 739-5059 Fax: (202) 739-3001 E-mail: stephen.burdick@morganlewis.com Counsel for Entergy Operations, Inc.