Text

Fiscal Year 2018 Final Fee Rule Work Papers
	ML17348A377
Person / Time
Issue date:	12/21/2017
From:	; NRC/OCFO
To:	;
	Blaney W
References
	Download: ML17348A377 (123)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:FY 2018 PROPOSED FEE RULE WORK PAPERS

FY 2018 Proposed Fee Rule Work Papers The supporting information to the FY 2018 Proposed Fee Rule is contained in the following work papers. The items identified in the Table of Contents are located behind a corresponding Tab. At the beginning of each Tab is a cross reference, if appropriate, to the location of the subject matter and Tables found within the Proposed Fee Rule Document. For example, a reference to "Section Ill." is the supporting information for: Section Ill. FY 2018 Fee Collection A. Amendments to 10 CFR Part 170 1. Professional Hourly Rate. The complete outline of the FY 2018 Proposed Fee Rule showing the Section and Table titles is located immediately following the Table of Contents.

Table of Contents FY 2018 Proposed Fee Rule Outline Budget and Fee Recovery Part 170 Fees Determination of Professional Hourly Rate Licensing Fees Export and Import Fees Reciprocity Fees--Agreement State Licensees General License Registration Fees Part 171 Annual Fees Fee-Relief Adjustment and LLW Surcharge Included in Annual Fees Fuel Facilities Uranium Recovery Facilities Operating Power Reactors Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning Test and Research Reactor Rare Earth Facilities Materials Users Transportation Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Budget Authority (FY 2018) FY 2018 Budget Summary by Program FY 2018 Budget by Product Line Office of Inspector General Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations Office of New Reactors Regional Offices Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response Office of General Counsel Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Office of International Programs Office of Enforcement Office of Investigations Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer Office of Administration OBRA-90, as amended Court Decision, 1993

FY 2018 Proposed Fee Rule Outline I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments

11.

Background; Statutory Authority Ill. Discussion Fee Collection - Overview Table I-Budget and Fee Recovery Amounts Fee Collection - Professional Hourly Rate Table II-Professional Hourly Rate Calculation Fee Collection - Flat Application Fee Changes Fee Collection - Fee-Relief and Low-Level Waste {LLW) Surcharge Table I I I-Fee-Relief Activities Table IV-Allocation of Fee-Relief Adjustment and LLW Surcharge, FY 2018 Fee Collection - Revised Annual Fees Table V-Rebaselined Annual Fees

a. Fuel Facilities Table VI-Annual Fee Summary Calculations for Fuel Facilities Table VII-Effort Factors for Fuel Facilities, FY 2018 Table VIII-Annual Fees for Fuel Facilities

b. Uranium Recovery Facilities Table IX-Annual Fee Summary Calculations for Uranium Recovery Facilities Table X-Costs Recovered Through Annual Fees; Uranium Recovery Fee Class Table XI-Benefit Factors for Uranium Recovery Licenses Table XII-Annual Fees for Uranium Recovery Licensees (other than DOE)

c. Operating Power Reactors Table XIII-Annual Fee Summary Calculations for Operating Power Reactors

IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. XII. XIII.

d. Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning Table XIV-Annual Fee Summary Calculations for the Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor in Decommissioning Fee Class

e. Research and Test Reactors (Non-power Reactors)

Table XV-Annual Fee Summary Calculations for Research and Test Reactors

f. Rare Earth

g. Materials Users Table XVI-Annual Fee Summary Calculations for Materials Users

h. Transportation Table XVII-Annual Fee Summary Calculations for Transportation Table XVIII-Distribution of Generic Transportation Resources, FY 2018 Fee Policy Changes Administrative Changes Regulatory Flexibility Certification Regulatory Analysis Backfitting and Issue Finality Plain Writing National Environmental Policy Act Paperwork Reduction Act Voluntary Consensus Standards Availability of Guidance Public Meeting Availability of Documents

Budget and Fee Recovery Section Ill Table I The NRC's total budget authority for FY 2018 is $967.0 million. The non-fee items include $1.3 million for WIR activities, $15.2 million for generic homeland security activities, $1.1 million for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board and $30.0 million for the Nuclear Waste Fund. Based on the 90 percent fee-recovery requirement, the NRC will have to recover approximately $827.5 million in FY 2018 through Part 170 licensing and inspection fees and Part 171 annual fees. The amount required by law to be recovered through fees for FY 2018 would be $22.9 million more than the amount estimated for recovery in FY 2017, an increase of 2.8 percent. The FY 2018 fee recovery amount is decreased by $0.8 million to account for billing adjustments (i.e., for FY 2018 invoices that the NRC estimates will not be paid during the fiscal year, less payments received in FY 2018 for prior year invoices ). This leaves approximately $826.7 million to be billed as fees in FY 2018 through Part 170 licensing and inspection fees and Part 171 annual fees. The NRC estimates that $289.4 million would be recovered from Part 170 fees in FY 2018. This represents a decrease of $7.9 million or approximately 2.7 percent as compared to the estimated Part 170 collections of $297.3 million for FY 2017. The remaining $537.3 million would be recovered through the Part 171 annual fees in FY 2018, which is an increase of 5.6 percent compared to estimated Part 171 collections of $508.6 million for FY 2017. See Tab "Budget Authority (FY 2018)" for supplemental information on the distribution of budgeted FTE and contract dollars.

Budget and Fee Recovery FY 2018 ($ in Millions) (Individual dollar amounts may not add to totals due to rounding) NRC Budget Authority Nuclear Waste Fund, Waste Incidental to Reprocessing, General Fund, generic homeland security activities Balance Fee Recovery Rate for FY 2018 Total Amount to be Recovered For FY 2018 Carryover from Prior Year Amount to be Recovered Through Fees and Other Receipts Estimated amount to be recovered through Part 170 fees and other receipts Estimated amount to be recovered through Part 171 annual fees Part 171 billing adjustments Adjusted Part 171 annual fee collections required FY 2018 X $967.0 -$47.6 $919.4 .90 $827.5 $0.0 $827.5 -$289.4 $538.1 -$0.8 $537.3 12/04/2017

Part 170 Fees Section II I.A

Part 170 Fees Determination of Professional Hourly Rate Section 111.A.1 Table II Proposed Professional Hourly Rate is $270 The NRC's professional hourly rate is derived by adding budgeted resources for (1) mission-direct program salaries and benefits; (2) mission indirect-program support; and (3) agency support (corporate support and the Inspector General {IG), then subtracting certain offsetting receipts and then dividing this total by mission direct full-time equivalents (FTE) converted to hours. The only budgeted resources excluded from the professional hourly rate are those for mission-direct contract activities. The NRC has reviewed and analyzed actual time and labor data in the NRC's Human Resource Management System for the most recent completed fiscal year (FY 2017) to determine if the annual direct hours worked per direct FTE estimate requires updating for the FY 2018 fee rule. Based on this review using actual time and labor data, the NRC determined that 1,510 hours is the best estimate of direct hours worked annually per direct FTE. This estimate excludes all non-direct activities, such as annual leave, sick leave, holidays, training, and general administration tasks.

Definitions of Professional Hourly Rate Components Mission-Direct Program Salaries and Benefits: These resources are allocated to perform core work activities committed to fulfilling the agency's mission of protecting public health and safety, promoting the common defense and security, and protecting the environment. These resources include the majority of the resources assigned under the direct business lines (Operating Reactors, New Reactors, Fuel Facilities, Nuclear Materials Users, Decommissioning and Low-Level Waste, and Spent fuel Storage and Transportation) are core work activities considered mission-direct. Mission-Indirect Program Support: These resources support the core mission-direct activities. These resources include, supervisory and nonsupervisory support, and mission travel and training. Supervisory and nonsupervisory support, and mission travel and training resources assigned under direct business line structure, are considered mission-indirect due to their supporting role of the core mission activities. Agency Support (Corporate Support and the IG): These resources are located in executive, administrative, and other support offices such as the Office of the Commission, the Office of the Secretary, the Office of the Executive Director for Operations, the Offices of Congressional and Public Affairs, the Office of the Inspector General, the Office of Administration, the Office of the Chief Financial Officer, the Office of the Chief Information Officer, the Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer and the Office of Small Business and Civil Rights. These resources administer the corporate or shared efforts that more broadly support the activities of the agency. These resources also include information technology services, human capital services, financial management and administrative support. Offsetting Receipts: The fees collected by the NRC for the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Indemnity (financial protection required of licensees for public liability claims of 10 CFR Part 140) are subtracted from the budgeted resources amount when calculating the 10 CFR Part 170 professional hourly rate per the guidance in 0MB Circular A-25 "User Charges." The budgeted resources for FOIA activities are allocated under the product for information services within the Corporate Support business line. The indemnity activities are allocated under the licensing actions and the Research and Test Reactors products within the Operating Reactors business line.

Estimated Annual Mission Direct FTE Productive hours: Also referred to as the productive hours assumption, reflects the average number of hours that a mission-direct employee spends on mission-direct work in a given year. This excludes hours charged to annual leave, sick leave, holidays, training and general administration tasks. The productive hours assumption is calculated using actual time and labor data in HRMS (minus support and supervisory staff). Total hours in mission business lines

Total hours in mission business lines

+ "Other Hours" 2,606,770 3,594,456 X X Total work hours in a year (2,087) Total work hours in a year (2,087) = Productive Hours Assumption 1,510 2,087 hours is used to be consistent with OPM guidance and the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 when determining pay The primary increase in productivity assumption is attributed mainly by the decline in direct staff hours for general administration and training attendance.

Page 1 of 2 DETERMINATION OF PROFESSIONAL HOURLY RATE CALCULATION OF FTE RATES BY PROGRAM This is for the purpose of converting FTE to $. PROGRAM NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY General

Fund NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY (Exel. NWF & General Fund)

NWF & General Fund CORPORA TE SUPPORT NWF & General Fund INSPECTOR GENERAL (in actual $) NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY CORPORATE SUPPORT: FELLOWSHIPS/SCHOLARSHIPS TOTAL (in actual $) NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY (BUDGET PROGRAM) TOTAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY (BUDGET PROGRArv TOTAL (in actual $) TOTAL TOTALS Direct Labor Direct Nonlabor (excl. from hourly rates) Indirect Program Support Labor Indirect Program Support Nonlabor Agency Support: Corporate & OIG Labor Agency Support: Corporate & OIG NonLabor TOTAL ( 1) (2) (2)/( 1) Total Total FTE FTE S&B($,K): Rate($) 1,969 346,165 175,808 9 1,577 175,200 534 94,435 176,846 93 16,430 176,667 616 106,908 173,552 58 9,918 171,000 3,279 575,434 MISSION DIRECT RESOURCES nonlabor $103,849,000 $25,221,000 $0 $129,070,000 labor $265,469,641 $75,689,876 $0 $341,1 59,517 PROGRAM SUPPORT (or MISSION INDIRECT) RESOURCES nonlabor $29,927,000 $6,720,000 $36,647,000 labor $80,695,739 $18,745,623 $99,441,362 AGENCY SUPPORT (or CORPORATE SUPPORT & IG) RESOURCES nonlabor $196,261,000 labor $116,826,121 Total($). $341,1 59,517 $129,070,000 $99,441,362 $36,647,000 $116,826,121 $196,261,000 $919,405,000 01/24/2018

L DETERMINATION OF PROFESSIONAL HOURLY RATE CONTINUED Total included in professional hourly rates: Mission-Direct Program Salaries & Benefits Mission-Indirect Program Support Agency Support: Corporate Support w/ Inspector General Total less offsetting receipts* Total in professional hourly rate** Mission-Direct FTE FTE rate** ('Total in professional hourly rates' divided by 'Mission Direct FTE') Annual Mission-direct FTE productive hours Mission-direct FTE converted to hours ('Mission Direct FTE' multiplied by 'Annual Mission direct FTE productive hours') % total 43.17% 17.22% 39.61% 100.00% Professional Hourly rate** ('Total in professional hourly rates' divided by 'FTE converted to hours')

Calculation of offsetting receipts FOIA Total Page 2 of 2 value

$341,159,517 $136,088,362 $313,087,121 $790,335,000 $18,491 $790,316,509 value 1,938 $407,810 1,510 2,926,380 $270 $17,891 $600 100% $17,891 INDEMNITY 100% $600 TOTAL $18,491

- Since offsetting receipts can not be used to offset total fee collections, offsetting receipts are not subtracted from numerator for FTE rate. Per fee policy documents, we can subtract these receipts when calculating professional hourly rates.

01/24/2018

Agency Support (Corporate Support and the IG): Budgeted Resources for Professional Hourly Rate Calculation FY18 FY17 Difference Contract /$,Kl FTE Contract 1$,Kl FTE Contract ($,Kl FTE CORPORATE SUPPORT BUSINESS LINE: CORPORATE SUPPORT Acquisitions Mission IT 6,202 2.0 4,574 3.0 1,628 (1.0' Commoditv Manaaement 0 3.0 0 0.0 0 3.0 Procurement Ooerations 156 45.0 156 50.0 0 (5.0 Administrative Assistants 0 1.0 0 1.0 0 0.0 Strateaic Sourcina 0 0.0 0 4.0 0 (4.0 Supervisory Staff 0 5.0 0 6.0 0 (1.0 Travel 15 0.0 15 0.0 0 0.0 Administrative Services Mission IT 2,841 2.0 1,705 2.0 1,136 0.0 Supervisory Staff 0 9.0 0 17.0 0 (8.0 Suooort Services 9,156 23.0 9,909 39.0 (753) (16.0' Administrative Assistants 295 2.0 295 4.0 0 (2.0 IT Infrastructure 0 0.0 50 0.0 (50) 0.0 Coroorate Rulemakina 0 0.0 0 3.0 0 (3.0 Facility ManaQement 9,934 13.0 10,267 17.0 (333) (4.0 Non-Supervisory Staff 108 6.0 60 6.0 48 0.0 Phvsical & Personnel Securitv 14,31 5 18.0 17,430 20.0 (3,115) (2.0 Travel 48 0.0 48 0.0 0 0.0 Rent & Utilities 47,579 1.0 46,721 1.0 858 0.0 Financial Management Mission IT 11,726 12.0 10,463 12.0 1,263 0.0 Corporate RulemakinQ 0 2.0 0 0.0 0 2.0 Suoervisory Staff 0 14.0 0 14.0 0 0.0 BudQetinQ 0 26.0 90 29.0 (90) (3.0 Administrative Assistants 85 4.0 176 4.0 (91) 0.0 Non-Suoervisory Staff 207 3.0 0 3.0 207 0.0 Travel 95 0.0 85 0.0 10 0.0 Financial Services 2,270 21.0 2,530 23.0 (260) (2.0 ManaQement controls 646 21.0 646 18.0 0 3.0 Performance ManaQement 0 0.0 90 6.0 (90) (6.0 Human Resource Management Mission IT 1,039 2.0 1,008 4.0 31 (2.0 Supervisory Staff 0 5.0 0 6.0 0 (1.0 Non-Supervisory Staff 162 2.0 157 3.0 5 (1.0 Administrative Assistants 0 1.0 0 2.0 0 (1.0 Travel 147 0.0 147 0.0 0 0.0 Emolovee/Labor Relations 15 5.0 15 7.0 0 (2.0 Policy Development & SWP 30 5.0 25 6.0 5 (1.0 Recruitment & Staffina 5,914 22.0 5,967 23.0 (53) (1.0' Work Life Services 2,156 5.0 2,156 6.0 0 (1.0' Information Management Mission Trainina 0 0.0 9,429 16.0 (9,429) (16.0 Content ManaQement 0 0.0 2,639 5.0 (2,639) (5.0 Information Services 0 0.0 1,807 21.0 (1,807) (21.0 Information Securitv 0 0.0 1,238 10.0 (1,238) (10.0 Information Technology IM Technoloaies 12,963 14 0 0 12,963 14.0 IT Infrastructure 43,609 74.0 44,725 78.0 (1,116) (4.0 IT applications infrastructure 2,624 5.0 2,624 5.0 0 0.0 IT Securitv 7,136 16.0 7,035 16.0 101 0.0 Information Services 1,807 17.0 0 0.0 1,807 17.0 Information Securitv 348 2.0 0 0.0 348 2.0 Suoervisory Staff 0 18.0 0 25.0 0 (7.0 Non-Supervisory Staff 0 5.0 0 5.0 0 0.0 Travel 98 0.0 98 0.0 0 0.0 Administrative Assistants 408 1.0 408 1.0 0 0.0 Content ManaQement 3,006 4.0 0 0.0 3,006 4.0 IT Strategic ManaQement 802 20.0 983 20.0 (181) 0.0 Outreach Small Business & Civil Riahts 457 6.0 457 8.0 0 (2.0 Outreach & Comoliance Coord. ProQram 462 3.0 0 0.0 462 3.0 Suoervisorv Staff 0 2.0 0 2.0 0 0.0

Agency Support (Corporate Support and the IG): Budgeted Resources for Professional Hour1y Rate Calculation FY18 FY17 Difference Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE Administrative Assistants 61 1.0 61 1.0 0 0.0 Non-Supervisory Staff 0 1.0 0 1.0 0 0.0 Mission IT 18 0.0 0 0.0 18 0.0 Travel 30 0.0 30 0.0 0 0.0 Policy Support Mission IT 614 0.0 620 0.0 (6) 0.0 International Cooperation 0 0.0 345 3.0 (345) (3.0) International Policy Outreach 265 3.0 0 0.0 265 3.0 Performance Management 80 1.0 0 0.0 80 1.0 Commission 70 35.0 222 21.0 (152) 14.0 Commission Appellate Adjunct. 90 6.0 178 7.0 (88) (1.0) EDO Operations 10 8.0 10 8.0 0 0.0 Policy Outreach 1,005 32.0 947 35.0 58 (3.0) Secretariat 0 17.0 0 18.0 0 (1.0) Official Representation 25 0.0 25 0.0 0 0.0 Business Process Improvements 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Supervisorv Staff 0 14.0 0 28.0 0 (14.0 Administrative Assistants 55 16.0 55 16.0 0 0.0 Non-Supervisory Staff 73 1.0 0 3.0 73 (2.0) Travel 1,023 0.0 874 0.0 149 0.0 Training Mission IT 263 2.0 160 2.0 103 0.0 TraininQ and Development 1,382 4.0 1,446 7.0 (64) (3.0) Oraanizational Development 0 2.0 200 2.0 (200) 0.0 Supervisory Staff 0 3.0 0 4.0 0 (1.0) Administrative Assistants 0 1.0 0 1.0 0 0.0 IT Security 245 0.0 207 0.0 38 0.0 Non-Supervisory Staff 0 2.0 0 2.0 0 0.0 Travel 281 0.0 281 0.0 0 0.0 Business Process Improvements 0 0.0 100 1.0 (100) (1.0) Total Agency Support (Corporate Support and the IG) Resources 194,451 616 191,989 711 2,462 (95.0) Total value of Corporate Support Resources( FY18 $194,451 contract funding+ 616 FTE multiplied by S&B rate) 194,451 $ 106,908 191,989 $106,449 2,462 459.0 3.0 Office of Inspector General 1,810 58.0 1,358 58.0 452 0.0 Total value of the Office of Inspector General Resources($1,810 contract funding + 58 FTE multiplied by S&B rate) 1,810 9,918 1,358 9,802 452 116.0 Total Agency Support (Corporate Support and the JG) Resources 196,261 $116,826 193,347 $116,251 2,914 575.0

Mission Program Indirect Budgeted Resources for Professional Hourly Rate Calculation FY18 FY17 Difference Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE PROGRAM : NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE : NEW REACTORS International Activities Licensing ExporUlmport 0 1.0 0 1.0 0 0.0 Licensing IT Infrastructure 1,611 0.0 1,802 0.0 (191) 0.0 EDO Operations 0 1.0 0 1.0 0 0.0 Policy Outreach 0 2.0 0 1.0 0 1.0 Business Process Improvements 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Training Training and Development 0 1.0 10 1.0 (10) 0.0 Travel Mission Travel 2,615 0.0 2,615 0.0 0 0.0 Support Staff Supervisory Staff 0 54.0 0 60.0 0 (6.0) Support Services 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Budgeting 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 HR Activities 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Information Services 0 0.0 0 2.0 0 (2.0) Admin Assistants 700 24.0 366 25.0 334 (1.0) Non-Supervisory Staff 48 12.0 0 9.0 48 3.0 PROGRAM : NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS Licensing RIC 718 2.0 718 2.0 0 0.0 EDO Operations 0 3.0 0 3.0 0 0.0 Policy Outreach 0 3.0 0 3.0 0 0.0 Business Improvements 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Oversight Mission IT 143 0.0 1,710 0.0 (1567) 0.0 IT Infrastructure 5,577 0.0 6,134 0.0 (557) 0.0 Research Mission IT 629 0.0 400 0.0 229 0.0 Training Training and Development 0 0.0 104 0.0 (104) 0.0 Business Process Improvements 0 1.0 0 1.0 0 0.0 Travel Mission Travel 14,445 0.0 13,595 0.0 850 0.0 Support Staff Supervisory Staff 0 187.0 0 207.0 0 (20.0) Support Services 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Budgeting 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Procurement Operations 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Content Management 0 0.0 1,051 4.0 (1051) (4.0) Information Services 0 0.0 105 6.0 (105) (6.0) Admin Assistants 1,302 93.0 990 93.0 312 0.0 Non-Supervisory Staff 2,139 76.0 478 61.0 1661 15.0 HR Activities 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safety 29,927 460.0 30,078 480.0 (151) (20.0) PROGRAM : NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES International Activities ExporUlmport 0 1.0 0 1.0 0 0.0 Oversight IT Infrastructure 407 0.0 501 0.0 (94) 0.0 Travel Mission Travel 1,101 0.0 1,058 0.0 43 0.0 Support Staff Supervisory Staff 0 16.0 0 17.0 0 (1.0) Support Services 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Budget 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Content Mgmt 0 0.0 82 0.0 (82) 0.0 Admin Assistants 268 4.0 268 4.0 0 0.0 Non-Supervisory Staff 82 2.0 0 2.0 82 0.0

Mission Program Indirect Budgeted Resources for Professional Hourty Rate Calculation PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS International Activities ExporUlmport 0 2.0 0 2.0 0 0.0 Licensing EDO Operations 0 1.0 0 1.0 0 0.0 Policy Outreach 0 1.0 0 0.0 0 1.0 Oversight IT Infrastructure 832 0.0 905 0.0 (73) 0.0 Travel Mission Travel 1,440 0.0 1,465 0.0 (25) 0.0 Training Business Process Improvements 0 1.0 0 1.0 0 1.0 Support Staff Supervisory Staff 0 24.0 0 27.0 0 (3.0) Support Services 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Budget 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Content Mgmt 0 0.0 41 0.0 (41) 0.0 Admin Assistants 0 9.0 0 9.0 0 0.0 HR Activities 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Information Security 0 0.0 137 0.0 (137) 0.0 Information Services 0 0.0 0 1.0 0 (1.0) Non-Supervisory Staff 497 11.0 0 13.0 497 (2.0) PROGRAM : NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE Licensing IT Infrastructure 346 0.0 457 0.0 (111) 0.0 Policy Outreach 0 1.0 0 1.0 0 0.0 Oversight 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Travel Mission Travel 797 0.0 659 0.0 138 0.0 Support Staff Supervisory Staff 0 11.0 0 11.0 0 0.0 Support Services 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Budget 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Content Mgmt 12 0.0 12 0.0 0 0.0 Admin Assistants 0 2.0 0 2.0 0 0.0 HR Activities 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Non-Supervisory Staff 0 2.0 0 2.0 0 0.0 PROGRAM : NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE : SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION Licensing IT Infrastructure 405 0.0 443 0.0 (38) 0.0 Policy Outreach 0 1.0 0 0.0 0 1.0 Oversight 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Travel Mission Travel 519 0.0 494 0.0 25 0.0 Support Staff Supervisory Staff 0 11.0 0 11.0 0 0.0 Support Services 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Content Mgmt 14 0.0 14 0.0 14 0.0 Budget 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Admin Assistants 0 2.0 0 2.0 0 0.0 Non-Supervisory Staff 0 3.0 0 3.0 0 0.0 Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety 6,720 105.0 6,536 110 184 (5.0) Total Mission Program Indirect Resources 36,647 565.0 36,614 590.0 33 (25.0) Total value of Mission Program Indirect Resources(FY 18 $36,647 contract funding + 565 FTE multiplied by S&B rate ) 36,647 99,441 36,614 $100,705 33 (1263.6)

Part 170 Fees Specific Services Section 111.A.2 Flat application fees are calculated by multiplying the average professional staff hours needed to process the licensing actions by the proposed professional hourly rate ($270 for FY 2018). The agency estimates the average professional staff hours every other year as part of its biennial review of fees which was performed in FY 2017. Full cost fees are determined based on the professional staff time and appropriate contractual support of services. The full cost fees for professional staff time will be determined at the professional hourly rate in effect the time the service was provided. The NRC estimates the amount of 10 CFR part 170 fees for each fee class based on established fee methodology guidelines (42 FR 22149; May 2, 1977), which specified that the NRC has the authority to recover the full cost of providing services to identifiable beneficiaries. The NRC uses these established guidelines to apply the most current financial data and workload projections by offices and divisions to calculate the 1 O CFR part 170 fee estimates. Current financial data includes: 1) four quarters of the most recent billing data (professional hourly rate invoice data); 2) actual contractual work charged (prior period data) to develop contract work estimates; and 3) the number of FTE hours charged, multiplied by the NRC professional hourly rate

01/19/2018 DETERMINATION OF MATERIALS PART 170 APPLICATION FEES and Average Inspection Costs ** FY 2018 FY2018 Professional Hourly Rate $270 Materials Part 170 Fee FY 2018 FY 2018 Fee/Cost FY 2018 Estimated (Professional Time x Fee/Cost Category Professional FY 2018 Professional (Rounded) Process Time Hourly Rate) (Hours)*

1. Special Nuclear Material 1C. Industrial Gauges Inspection Costs**

7.7 $2,080 $2,100 New License 4.6 $1,242 $1,200

10. All Other SNM Material, less critical mass Inspection Costs**

23.5 $6,347 $6,300 New License 9.3 $2,512 $2,500

2. Source Material

28. Shielding Inspection Costs**

10 $2,701 $2,700 New License 4.4 $1,188 $1,200 2C. Exempt Distribution/SM Inspection Costs** 14.4 $3,889 $3,900 New License 8.1 $2,188 $2,200

20. General License Distribution Inspection Costs**

15.6 $4,213 $4,200 New License 9.9 $2,674 $2,700 2E. Manufacturing Distribution Inspection Costs** 15.6 $4,213 $4,200 New License 9.5 $2,566 $2,600 2F. All Other Source Material Inspection Costs** 27.7 $7,481 $7,500 New License 9.5 $2,566 $2,600

3. Byproduct Material 3A. Mfg-Broad Scope Inspection Costs**

67.7 $18,283 $18,300 New License 46.8 $12,639 $12,600

3. Byproduct Material 3A1. Mfg-Broad Scope Inspection Costs**

90.0 $24,317 $24,300 New License 62.2 $16,81 0 $16,800

3. Byproduct Material 3A2. Mfg-Broad Scope Inspection Costs**

112.4 $30,351 $30,400 New License 77.7 $20,981 $21,000 Page 1

01/19/2018 DETERMINATION OF MATERIALS PART 170 APPLICATION FEES and Average Inspection Costs ** FY 2018 FY2018 Professional Hourly Rate $270 3B. Mfg-Other Inspection Costs** 33.2 $8,966 $9,000 New License 12.9 $3,484 $3,500 3B1. Mfo-Other (sites 6-19} Inspection Costs** 44.156 $11,925 $11,900 New License 17.157 $4,634 $4,600 3B2. Mfg-Other (sites 20 or more ) Inspection Costs** 55.112 $14,884 $14,900 New License 21.414 $5,783 $5,800 JC. Mfg/Distribution Radlopharmaceuticals Inspection Costs** 27.3 $7,373 $7,400 New License 18.7 $5,050 $5,100 3C1. Mfo/Distribution Radlooharmaceuticals Inspection Costs** 36.3 $9,806 $9,800 New License 24.9 $6,717 $6,700 3C2. Mfg/Distribution Radiopharmaceuticals Inspection Costs** 45.3 $12,239 $12,200 New License 31.0 $8,383 $8,400 JD. Distribution Radiopharmaceuticals/No Process Inspection Costs** 0 $0 $0 New License 0 $0 $0 3E. lrradiators/Self-Shielded Inspection Costs** 38.6 $10,425 $10,400 New License 11.5 $3,106 $3,100 3F. lrradiators < 10,000 Ci Inspection Costs** 15.7 $4,240 $4,200 New License 23.4 $6,320 $6,300 JG. lrradiators => 10,000 Ci Inspection Costs** 20.9 $5,644 $5,600 New License 223.2 $60,279 $60,300 3H. Exempt Distribution/Device Review Inspection Costs** 14.7 $3,970 $4,000 New License 23.9 $6,455 $6,500

31. Exempt Distribution/No Device Review Inspection Costs**

14.4 $3,889 $3,900 New License 35.8 $9,668 $9,700 3J. General License Distribution/Device Review Inspection Costs** 10.5 $2,836 $2,800 New License 7.2 $1,944 $1,900 Page 2

01/19/2018 DETERMINATION OF MATERIALS PART 170 APPLICATION FEES and Average Inspection Costs "* FY 2018 FY2018 Professional Hourly Rate $270 3K. General License Distribution/No Device Review Inspection Costs'* 10.4 $2,809 $2,800 New License 4.1 $1,107 $1,100 3L. R&D-Broad Inspection Costs** 36.2 $9,776 $9,800 New License 19.7 $5,320 $5,300 3L 1 R&D-Broad Inspection Costs** 48.1 $13,003 $13,000 New License 26.2 $7,076 $7,100 3L2 R&D-Broad Inspection Costs'* 60.1 $16,229 $16,200 New License 32.7 $8,832 $8,800 3M. R&D-Other Inspection Costs'* 22.5 $6,076 $6,100 New License 25.6 $6,914 $6,900 3N. Service License Inspection Costs'* 39.1 $10,560 $10,600 New License 26.2 $7,076 $7,100

30. Radiography Inspection Costs**

27.5 $7,427 $7,400 New License 11.4 $3,079 $3,100 301. Radioaraohv Inspection Costs'* 36.6 $9,878 $9,900 New License 15.2 $4,095 $4,100 302. Radioaraohv Inspection Costs'* 45.7 $12,329 $12,300 New License 18.9 $5,111 $5,100 3P. All Other Byproduct Material Inspection Costs'* 26.5 $7,157 $7,200 New License 12.4 $3,349 $3,300 3P1. All Other Byproduct Material Inspection Costs'* 35.2 $9,518 $9,500 New License 16.5 $4,454 $4,500 3P2. All Other Byproduct Material Inspection Costs'* 44.0 $11,880 $11,900 New License 20.6 $5,559 $5,600 Page 3

01/19/2018 DETERMINATION OF MATERIALS PART 170 APPLICATION FEES and Average Inspection Costs ** FY 2018 FY2018 Professional Hourly Rate $270 3R1. Radium-226 {less than or equal to 1 Ox limits in 31.12) Inspection Costs** 24.2 $6,536 $6,500 New License 9.2 $2,485 $2,500 3R2. Radium-226 (more than 10x limits in 31.12) Inspection Costs** 16.2 $4,375 $4,400 New License 9 $2,431 $2,400

35. Accelerator Produced Radionuclides Inspection Costs**

29.5 $7,967 $8,000 New License 51.1 $13,800 $13,800

4. Waste Disposal/Processing 4B. Waste Packaaina Inspection Costs**

24.5 $6,61 7 $6,600 New License 24.9 $6,725 $6,700 4C. Waste-Prepackaged Inspection Costs** 14.2 $3,835 $3,800 New License 18 $4,861 $4,900

5. Well Logging SA. Well Logging Inspection Costs**

34.8 $9,398 $9,400 New License 16.5 $4,456 $4,500

6. Nuclear Laundries 6A. Nuclear Laundry Inspection Costs**

21.7 $5,860 $5,900 New License 79.7 $21,524 $21,500

7. Human Use 7A. Teletherapy Inspection Costs**

28.9 $7,805 $7,800 New License 40 $10,803 $10,800

7. Human Use 7A1. Teletherapy Inspection Costs**

38.4 $10,381 $10,400 New License 53.2 $14,368 $14,400

7. Human Use 7A2. Teletherapy Inspection Costs**

48.0 $12,956 $13,000 New License 66.4 $17,932 $1 7,900 Page 4

DETERMINATION OF MATERIALS PART 170 APPLICATION FEES and Average Inspection Costs ** FY2018 Professional Hourly Rate $270 7B. Medical-Broad Inspection Costs** New License 7B1. Medical-Broad Inspection Costs** New License 7B2. Medical-Broad Inspection Costs** New License 7C. Medical-Other Inspection Costs** New License

8. Civil Defense SA. Civil Defense Inspection Costs**

New License

9. Device, product or sealed source evaluation 9A. Device evaluation-commercial distribution Application - each device 9B. Device evaluation - custom Application - each device 9C. Sealed source evaluation - commercial distribution Application - each source NOTES:

9D. Sealed source evaluation - custom Application - each source

10. Transportation 10B. Evaluation - Part 71 QA pro11ram Application - approval

17. Master Materials License' Inspection Costs**

New License Rounding: <$1000 rounded to nearest $10, =or>$1000 and <$100,000 rounded to nearest $100, =or>$100,000 rounded to nearest $1,000

hours based on FY 2018 Biennial Review
- Inspection costs are used in computation of the Annual fees for the category 1 Beginning with FY 2011 fee rule, the Master Materials License Part 170 application fee was eliminated. Per FSME's recommendation in their Biennial Review, the fee for a new MML license will be fully costed based on the hours spent on reviewing a new application.

FY 2018 Page 5 48.9 31.2 65.0 41.5 81.2 51.8 24.3 19.9 24.2 9.2 19.5 32.4 19 3.8

15. 1 399.1 416.7

$13,206 $8,426 $17,564 $11,207 $21,922 $1 3,987 $6,563 $5,374 $6,536 $2,485 $5,266 $8,750 $5,131 $1,026 $4,078 $107,783 $112,537 $13,200 $8,400 $17,600 $11,200 $21,900 $14,000 $6,600 $5,400 $6,500 $2,500 $5,300 $8,800 $5,100 $1,030 $4,100 $107,800 $112,500 01 /19/2018

Part 170 Fees Export and Import Fees Section 111.A.2 Flat application fees are calculated by multiplying the average professional staff hours needed to process the licensing actions by the proposed professional hourly rate ($270 for FY 2018). The agency estimates the average professional staff hours every other year as part of its biennial review of fees. The agency estimates the average professional staff hours every other year as part of its biennial review of fees which was performed in FY 2017.

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to Import-Export Fee Class FY18 Contract ($,K) FTE PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NEW REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/ PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: International Activities Licensing Import/Export 0 1.0 Total Direct Resources 0 1.0 Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safety 0

1.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: International Activities Licensing Import/Export 0 0.0 Total Direct Resources 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: International Activities Licensing Import/Export 0 2.0 Total Direct Resources 0

2.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety 0 2.0 TOTAL 0 3.0 Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract $) $1,223 12/01 /2017 FY17 Difference Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 1.0 0 0.0 0 1.0 0 0.0 0 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 2.0 0 0.0 0 2.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 2.0 0 0.0 0 3.0 0 0.0 $1,184 $39 Page 1 of 1

01 /19/2018 DETERMINATION OF MATERIALS PART 170 APPLICATION FEES and Average Inspection Costs ** FY 2018 FY2018 Professional Hourly Rate $270 DETERMINATION OF EXPORT AND IMPORT PART 170 FEES FY 2018 FY 2018 Professional Hourly Rate= $270 Export and Import Part 170 Fees FY 201 8 FY 2018 Fee/Cost FY 2018 Estimated (Professional Time x Fee/Cost Category Professional FY 2018 Professional (Rounded) Process Time Hourly Rate) (Hours)* 10 CFR 170.21, Category K Subcate!lorv 1 70 18,905 18,900 2 35 9,452 9,500 3 17 4,591 4,600 4 17 4,591 4,600 5 10 2,701 2,700 10 CFR 170.31, Category 15 Subcategory A 70 18,905 18,900 B 35 9,452 9,500 C 17 4,591 4,600 D 17 4,591 4,600 E 10 2,701 2,700 F 55 14,854 14,900 G 30 8,102 8,100 H 15 4,051 4,100 I 1 270 300 J 55 14,854 14,900 K 30 8, 102 8,100 L 12 3,241 3,200 M 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 R 5 1,350 1,400 NOTES: The application fees and amendment fees are the same for each subcategory because, per discussion with IP representatives, the processing time is the same for a new license or an amendment to the license. Rounding: <$1000 rounded to nearest $10, =or>$1000 and <$100,000 rounded to nearest $100, =or>$100,000 rounded to nearest $1,000

databased on FY 2017 Biennial Review Page 1

Part 170 Fees Reciprocity Fees - Agreement State Licensees Section 111.A.2 The application fee for Agreement State licensees who conduct activities under the reciprocity provisions of 10 CFR 150.20 is determined using FYs 2012 through 2015 data and the FY 2018 professional hourly rate. The FYs 2012-2015 reciprocity fee data was provided as part of the FY 2017 biennial review of fees.

FY2018 Professional Hourly Rate $270 DETERMINATION OF MATERIALS PART 170 APPLICATION FEES and Average Inspection Costs ** FY 2018 DETERMINATION OF RECIPROCITY PART 170 FEES FY 2018 NOTES: The reciprocity application and revision fees are determined using FYs 2012-2015 data*, and the FY 2018 professional hourly rate. The reciprocity application fee includes average costs for inspections, average costs for processing initial filings of NRC Form 241, and averaqe costs for processinq chanqes to the initial filinqs of NRC Form 241. FY 2018 Professional Hourly Rate: Average inspection costs: Inspection Initial 241s Reciprocity Part 170 Fee Fee Category 16 Number of Inspections Conducted for FY12-15 Total Average for the 4 years Number of Completions for FY12-15 Total Average for the 4 years Revised 241s Number of Completions for FY12-15 Total Average for the 4 years APPLICATION FEE: Amount for inspections [Cost/Initial 241] Amount for initial filing of NRC Form 241 [Cost/Initial 241] $270 76 Q 76 19 855 Q 855 213.75 6345 Q 6345 1586.25 $480 $600 $742 $1,822

or revisions to initial filing of NRC Form 241 [Cost/Initial 241] ___ ---=-~

Total Application Fee Application Fee Rounded $1,800

databased on FY 2017 Biennial Review Page 1 Avg Inspection Costs (Avg. no.

of hours for insp.x professional hourlv rate) $5,400 $600 $100 Total Amount $102,600 $128,250 $158,625 01/19/2018

Part 170 Fees General License Registration Fees Section 111.A.2 This fee under byproduct material is for registration of a device(s) generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter.

DETERMINATION OF MATERIALS PART 170 APPLICATION FEES and Average Inspection Costs ** FY2018 Hourly Rate $270 FY 2018 DETERMINATION OF GENERAL LICENSE REGISTRATION FEE, FY 2018 (FEE CATEGORY 30) NMSS GL Program budgeted FTE budgeted contract $ full cost of FTE Regions HQ Regions HQ total budgeted resources, NMSS GL Program (equals full cost of FTE + contract $) portion of budgeted resources associated w/fee exempt GLs (nonprofit educational) net to be recovered fee assuming 525 registrable GLs fee, rounded Total % Supporting GL Resources Registrable Gls $407,810 Data based on the NRG budget documents and the 11 /17 email from J.Rand(NMSS GL program). Page 1 Total Supporting Registrable Gls 0.20 $0 $288,500 $407,810 $370,062 $24,794 $345,268 $657.65 $700 12/01 /2017

Part 171 Annual Fees Section 111.B

Part 171 Annual Fees Application of Fee-Relief Adjustment and LL W Surcharge Section 111.B.1 Table Ill Table IV The NRC applies the 10 percent of its budget that is excluded from fee recovery under OBRA-90, as amended (fee relief), to offset the total budget allocated for activities which do not directly benefit current NRC licensees. The budgeted resources for these fee-relief activities are totaled, and then reduced by the amount of the NRC's fee relief. Any difference between the fee relief and the budgeted amount of these activities results in a fee relief adjustment (increase or decrease) to all licensees' annual fees, based on their percent of the budget (the majority is allocated to power reactors each year). The FY 2018 budgeted resources for NRC's fee-relief activities are $97.1 million. The NRC's 10 percent fee relief amount in FY 2018 is $91.9 million, leaving a $5.2 million fee-relief surcharge that will increase all licensees' annual fees based on their percentage share of the budget. Separately, the NRC has continued to allocate the low-level waste (LLW) surcharge based on the volume of LLW disposal of three classes of licensees, operating reactors, fuel facilities, and materials users.

Fee-Relief Activity-Rebaseline FY 2018 FEE-RELIEF ACTIVITIES AND LLW GENERIC SURCHARGE FTE rate: $407,810 DIRECT RESOURCES Less Part 170 FEE AMOUNT materials $,M FTE decommissioning ($,M) revenue,$ M TOTALNRC NONPROFIT EDUCATIONAL EXEMPTION 0.91 19.6 8.898 INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES 6.44 17.7 13.66 SMALL ENTITY SUBSIDY 7.08 AGREEMENT STATE OVERSIGHT 1.87 27.9 13.243 REGULATORY SUPPORT TO AGREEMENT STATES 2.74 35.9 17.384 ISL RULE/GENERAL LICENSEES/MOL Y99/FELLOWSHIPS & SCHOLARSHIP/ 16.25 8 19.39 DECOMMISSIONING/RECLAMATION GENERIC 1.96 40.3 3.77 14.62 MILITARY RADIUM 226 0.00 2.8 1.14 NON-MILITARY RADIUM 226 0.00

4. 1 1.67 LLW GENERIC SURCHARGE 0.30 7.5 3.36 TOTAL 30.47 163.5 100.45 To meet the 90% fee recovery requirement for FY 2018, the Fee-Relief Activities are reduced by 10%

of NRC's FY 2018 net budget authority (appropriation less Non-Recoverable Fee ltems1, as shown below) ($,Ml Fee-Relief Activity (Total above less LLW generic surcharge)' 97.09 Budget Authority minus Non-Fee Items 919.41 Percent reduction in fee recovery amount for FY 2018 10.0% Reduction in annual fee recovery amount for FY 2018 91.94 Delta, Fee-Relief Activity (less generic LLW) and reduction in fee recovery amt 5.15 Generic LLW Surcharge amount 3.36 Net adjustment to fee assessments 8.51 DISTRIBUTION OF ADJUSTMENT TO FEE ASSESSMENTS LLW GENERIC SURCHARGE FEE-RELIEF ACTIVITIES TOTAL ADJUSTMENT PERCENT $,M PERCENT $,M $,M POWER REACTORS 41 % 1.4 85.18% 4.3906 5.76 1255 SPENT FUEL STORAGE/REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING 0 0 4.36% 0.2250 0.2250 TEST AND RESEARCH REACTORS 0 0 0.37% 0.0192 0.0192 FUEL FACILITIES 46% 1.6 4.51 % 0.2325 1.7904 MATERIALS 13% 0.430 3.39% 0.1746 0.6044 TRANSPORTATION 0 0 0.53% 0.0272 0.0272 RARE EARTH FACILITIES 0 0 0.00% 0.0000 0.0000 URANIUM RECOVERY 0 0 1.66% 0.0855 0.0855 TOTAL 100.024 3.36 100.01% 5.15 8.51 NOTES: ' Non-Recoverable Fee Items: DNFSB, W IR, ARI and generic homeland security ' Generic LLW activities are not considered a fairness and eauitv issue because licensees will benefit from these activities 12/01 /2017

FEE RELIEF ADJUSTMENT SUPPLEMENTAL To meet the 90% fee recovery requirement for FY 2018, the Fee-Relief Activities are reduced by 10% of NRC's FY 2018 net budget authority (appropriation less Non-Recoverable Fee Items, as shown below) Fee-Relief Activity (Total previous page less LLW generic surcharge) Budget Authority minus Adv. Reactor, WIR, DNFSB & generic HLS Percent reduction in fee recovery amount for FY 2018 Reduction in annual fee recovery amount for FY 2018 Delta, Fee-Relief Activity (less generic LLW) and reduction in fee recovery amount Generic LLW Surcharge amount Net adjustment to fee assessments

Individual values may not sum tot totals due to rounding.

FY 2018 ($,M) $97.1 $919.4 10.0% $91.9 $5.2 $3.4 $8.5 FY 2017 ($,M) $101.5 $894.0 10.0% $89.4 $12.1 $3.2 $15.2 Variance ($,M) -$4.4 $25.4 $2.5 -$6.9 $0.2 -$6.7

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to Nonprofit Education Exemption Fee-Relief Category FEE-RELIEF ALLOCATION DETERMINED BY OCFO, IN CONSULTATION WITH PROGRAM OFFICES FY18 FY17 Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NEW REACTORS PRODUCT LINE I PRODUCTS: Oversight Allegations & Investigations 0 0.0 0 0.0 Construction Inspection 0 0.0 0 0.0 Emergency Preparedness 0 0.0 0 0.0 Enforcement 0 0.0 0 0.0 Mission IT 0 0.0 0 0.0 Part 50 0 0.0 0 0.0 Security 0 0.0 0 0.0 Vendor Inspection 0 0.0 0 0.0 Training 0 0.0 0 0.0 Mission Training 0 0.0 0 0.0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 0.0 Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Research & Test Reactors 453 12.5 717 14.0 Oversight Allegations & Investigations 0 0.0 0 0.0 Emergency Preparedness 0 0.0 0 0.0 Enforcement 0 0.0 1 0.0 Event Evaluation 0 0.0 0 0.0 Inspection 0 0.0 0 0.0 Mission IT 0 0.0 0 0.0 Research & Test Reactor lnsp. 0 2.5 0 2.7 Security 0 0.0 0 0.0 Rulemaking Rulemaking 405 0.0 303 0.0 Training Fukushima NTIF 0 0.0 0 0.0 Mission Training 6 0.0 23 0.0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 0.0 Total Direct Resources 864 15.0 1,044 16.7 Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safety 864 15.0 1,044 16.7 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 0.0 L__ PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Licensing Actions 2 2.0 2 2.5 Mission IT 1 0.0 1 0.0 Security 0 0.0 0 0.0 Oversight Allegations & Investigations 0 0.5 0 0.5 Enforcement 3 0.4 3 0.4 Event Evaluation 0 0.1 0 0.0 Inspection 5 0.7 3 0.8 Mission IT 0 0.0 0 0.0 Security 0 0.0 0 0.0 Research Materials Research 0 0.0 0 0.0 Rulemaking Rulemaking 0 0.6 0 0.6 Training Mission Training 7 0.0 10 0.0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 0.0 Total Direct Resources 17 4.3 18 4.8 12/01/2017 Difference Contract ($,K) FTE 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 (264) (1.5) 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 (1) 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 (0.2) 0 0.0 102 0.0 0 0.0 (17) 0.0 0 0.0 (180) (1.7) (180) (1 7) 0 0.0 (0) (0.5) 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 (0) 0.1 2 (0.1) 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 (3) 0.0 0 0.0 (1) (0.5) Page 1 of 2

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to Nonprofit Education Exemption Fee-Relief Category FEE-RELIEF ALLOCATION DETERMINED BY OCFO, IN CONSULTATION WITH PROGRAM OFFICES FY18 FY17 Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Emergency Preparedness 0 0.0 0

o.o Environmental Reviews 0

0.0 0 0.0 Licensing Support 0 0.0 0 0.0 Mission IT 0 0.0 0 0.0 Security 0 0.0 0 0.0 Storage Licensing 0 0.0 0 0.0 Transportation Certification 24 0.3 18 0.3 Oversight Inspection 0 0.0 0 0.0 Rulemaking Rulemaking (PL) 0 0.0 0 0.0 Security 0 0.0 0 0.0 Travel Mission Travel 0 0.0 0 0.0 Training Mission Training 0 0.0 0 0.0 Total Direct Resources 24 0.3 18 0.3 Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety 41 4.6 36 5.1 TOTAL Nonprofit Education Exemption 906 19.6 1,080 21.8 Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract $) $8,899 $9,681 Difference Contract ($,K) FTE 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 0.0 5 (0.5) (175) (2.2) ($782) The nonprofit educational Fee-Relief category includes resources originally allocated to the test and research reactor, materials users, and transportation fee classes, that are prorated to the Fee-Relief Activities based on the number nonprofit educational institution licensees in each fee class (approx. 90%, 6%, and 3%, respectively). 12/01/2017 Page 2 of 2

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to International Activities Fee-Relief Category FY18 Contract ($, K) FTE FY1 7 Contract ($,K) PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NEW REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/ PRODUCTS: International Activities 1nternat1ona1 vooperahon u 0.0 u Training Mission Training 0 0.0 0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: International Activities Conventions & Treaties 0 1.0 0 International Cooperation 0 0.0 0 Training Fukushima NTIF 0 0.0 0 Mission Training 10 0.0 8 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 10 1.0 8 Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safety 10 1.0 8 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: International Activities Conventions & Treaties 0 4.0 0 Licensing Import/Export 0 0.0 0 International Cooperation 0 1.0 0 Training Mission Training 0 0.0 0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 0 5.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: International Activities International Technical Cooperation 0 0.7 0 International Assistance 6,009 7.0 6,444 Travel International Activities Travel 350 0.0 0 Training Mission Training 0 0.0 0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 6,359 7.7 6,444 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: International Activities International Technical Cooperation 0 1.0 0 Conventions & Treaties 75 1.0 0 Mission Training Training 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 75 2.0 0 12/01/2017 Difference FTE Contract ($,K) FTE O.u u 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 1.0 0 0.0 0.6 0 (0.6) 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 2 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 1.6 2 (0.6) 1.6 2 (0.6) 4.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 1.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 5.0 0 0.0 0.7 0 0.0 7.0 (435) 0.0 0.0 350 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 7.7 (85) 0.0 1.0 0 0.0 1.0 0 1.0 0.0 0 0.0 2.0 75 0.0 Page 1 of 2

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to International Activities Fee-Relief Category FY18 Contract ($,K) FTE FY17 Contract ($,K) PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: International Activities International Technical Cooperation 0 1.0 100 Conventions & Treaties 0 1.0 0 Mission Travel Training Mission Training 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 0 2.0 100 Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety 6,434 16.7 6,544 TOTAL INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES 6,444 17.7 6,552 Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract $) $13,662 $13,772 Difference FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 1.0 (100) 0.0 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 2.0 (100) 0.0 16.7 (110) 0.0 18.3 (108) (0.6) ($110) NRC does not charge licensees fees for costs associated with NRC's providing international assistance to foreign regulatory counterparts for improving safety and security of civilian uses of radioactive materials or costs associated with conventions and treaties which support and implement legally binding obligations incurred by the U.S. Government involving nuclear nonproliferation, safety, physical protection, waste and spent fuel management, emergency preparedness and response, and counter-terrorism which benefit cannot be identified by fee class. However, if international cooperation activities benefit a group of licensees, the associated resources should be allocated to the corresponding fee category and not to the International Fee-Relief Category. Some of the international regulatory information exchanges and policy and priority formulation activities can also provide direct input to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulation and oversight of its licensees and can provide other benefits to NRC licensees. For example, power reactor licensees can benefit from international efforts to exchange information on regulatory experience and expertise on construction, startup, and the operation of nuclear power plants. 12/01/201 7 Page 2 of 2

International Activities Supplemental FEE CLASS/ FEE RELIEF CATEGORY Operating Power Reactors Spent Fuel Storage / Reactor Decommissioning Fuel Facilities Transportation Material Users Fee Relief: International Activities Fee Relief: Agreement State Regulatory Support Fee Relief: Generic Decommissioning & Reclamation Total value of budgeted resources(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract $) BUDGETRESOURCE:PRODUCTS International Cooperation International Assistance Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 120 21.0 90 1.5 0 0.0 90 0.5 0 3.6 0 3.7 6,009 7.0 0 0.7 0 2.0 300 33 6,009 7.0 13,758 8,864

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to Agreement State Oversight Fee-Relief Category FY18 FY17 Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NEW REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/ PRODUCTS: Training Mission Training 10 0.0 6 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 10 0.0 6 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Training Mission Training 28 0.2 23 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 28 0.2 23 Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safety 38 0.2 29 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Oversight Allegations & Investigations 0 0.0 0 Enforcement 0 0.0 0 Event Evaluation 0 0.0 0 Inspection 0 0.0 0 Mission IT 0 0.0 0 Security 0 0.0 0 Research Waste Research 0 0.7 0 State Tribal and Federal Programs Agreement States 125 27.0 125 Mission IT 187 0.0 187 Travel Agreement State Travel 1,159 0.0 1,139 Training Mission Training 0 0.0 0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 1,471 27.7 1,451 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Decommissioning Licensing Actions 0 0.0 0 Uranium Recovery Lie. Actions 0 0.0 0 Mission Training Training 356 0.0 381 Rulemaking Rulemaking Support 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 356 0.0 381 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety 1,827 27.7 1,832 TOTAL AGREEMENT STATE OVERSIGHT 1,865 27.9 1,861 Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract $) $13,243 $12,868 12/01/2017 Difference FTE Contract {$,K) FTE 0.0 4 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 4 0.0 0.2 5 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.2 5 0.0 0.2 9 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.7 0 0.0 27.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 20 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 27.7 20 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 (25) 0.0 0.0 0.0 (25) 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 27.7 (5) 0.0 27.9 4 0.0 $375 Page 1 of 1

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to Agreement State Regulatory Support Fee-Relief Category FEE-RELIEF ALLOCATION DETERMINED BY OCFO, IN CONSULTATION WITH PROGRAM OFFICES FY18 FY17 Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K} PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NEW REACTORS PRODUCT LINE I PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safety 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Training Mission Training 160 0.0 0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 160 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Event Response Response Operations 0 1.7 0 Response Programs 0 1.7 0 International Activities International Copperation 0 0.7 0 Licensing Licensing Actions 30 12.9 105 Licensing Support 242 0.2 242 Mission IT 305 0.0 282 Security 0 0.0 0 Oversight Allegations & Investigations 0 0.4 0 Enforcement 0 0.0 0 Event Evaluation 1,152 3.9 1,206 Inspection 6 3.9 3 Mission IT 0 0.0 0 Security 0 0 0 Rulemaking Rulemaking 0 2.7 0 Rulemaking Support 0 2.2 0 Security 0 0.0 0 Research Materials Research 0 0.0 0 State Tribal and Federal Programs Agreement States 0 0.0 0 Liaison 0 0.9 0 Travel Agreement State Travel 0 0.0 0 Training Mission Training 848 1.7 1,200 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 2,584 32.9 3,038 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Uranium Recovery Enviromental Reviews 0 1.0 0 Uranium Recovery Lie. Actions 0 2.0 0 Mission Training Training 0 0.0 0 Rulemaking Rulemaking Support 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 0 3.0 0 12/01/2017 Difference FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 160 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 160 0.0 1.7 0 0.0 1.7 0 0.0 0.7 0 0.0 13.4 (75) (0.5) 0.2 0 0.0 0.9 23 (0.9) 0.0 0 0.0 1.3 0 (0.9) 0.0 0 0.0 4.7 (54) (0.8) 6.0 3 (2.1) 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 2.7 0 0.0 2.2 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.3 0 (0.3) 0.0 0 0.0 0.9 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 1.7 (352) 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 38.4 (455) (5.5) 0.0 0 1.0 0.7 0 1.3 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.7 0 2.3 Page 1 of 2

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to Agreement State Regulatory Support Fee-Relief Category FEE-RELIEF ALLOCATION DETERMINED BY OCFO, IN CONSULTATION WITH PROGRAM OFFICES FY18 FY17 Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCT$: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety 2,744 35.9 3,038 TOTAL AGREEMENT STATE REGULATORY SUPPORT 2,744 35.9 3,038 Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract$) $17,384 $18,464 Difference FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 0.0 0 0.0 39.1 (295) (3.2) 39.1 (295) (3.2) ($1,080) The Agreement State regulatory support Fee-Relief category includes resources originally allocated to the materials users, that are prorated to the surcharge based on the number licensees in Agreement States in each fee class (approx. 87% ). 12/01/2017 Page 2 of 2

2/23/200~ Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to In-situ Leach Facilities Rulemaking, Unregistered General licensees, MOL Y 99 and Fellowships Scholarships Fee-Relief Category FY18 FY17 Difference Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NEW REACTORS PRODUCT LINE I PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Research & Test Reactors 725 4.4 1,109 6.3 (384) Oversight 0 Research & Test Reactor Inspection 0 1.0 0 1.0 0 Mission IT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Rutemaking Rulemaking 0 0.0 168 0.0 (168) Total Direct Resources 725 5.4 1,277 7.3 (552) Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safety 725 5.4 1,277 7.3 (552) PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Licensing Support 289 0.8 289 0.8 0 Oversight Inspection 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Mission IT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Security 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Rulemaking Rule making 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Training Mission Training 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 289 0.8 289 0.8 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Decommissioning Licensing Actions 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Uranium Recovery Lie. Actions 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Rulemaking Rulemaking 240 1.5 240 1.5 0 Mission Training Training 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 240 1.5 240 1.5 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety 529 2.3 529 2.3 0 PROGRAM: CORPORATESUPPORT Outreach MSI Grants 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Integrated University Program 15,000 0.0 15,000 0.0 0 Outreach & Compliance Coord. Pgm. 0 0.0 562 6.0 (562) Grand Total Corporate Support 15,000 0.0 15,562 6.0 (562) TOTAL tSLJMOL Y99/GENERAL LICENSEES/FELLOWSHIPS & 16,254 7.7 17,368 15.6 (1,114) SCHOLARSHIPS Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract $) $19,394 $23,522 ($4,129) FTE 0.0 (1.9) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (1.9) (1.9) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (6.0) (6.0) (7.9) Page 1 of 1

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to Remediation of Non-Military Unlicensed Radium Sites FY18 FY17 Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NEW REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/ PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safety 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Rulemaking Rulemaking 0 0.0 0 Training Mission Training 0 0.0 0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Decomm. Licensing Actions 0 4.1 0 Rulemaklng Rulemaking 0 0.0 0 Rulemaking Support 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 0 4.1 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety 0 4.1 0 TOTAL GENERIC LOW LEVEL WASTE 0 4.1 0 Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract $) * $1,672 $0 Difference FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 4.1 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 4.1 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 4.1 0.0 0 4.1 $1,672

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to Department of Defense Remediation program MOU activities FY18 FY17 Contract($, K) FTE Contract ($,K) PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NEW REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/ PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safety 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Rulemaking Rulemaking 0 0.0 0 Training Mission Training 0 0.0 0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Decomm. Licensing Actions 0 2.8 70 Rulemaking Rulemaking 0 0.0 0 Rulemaking Support 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 0 2.8 70 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safetv 0 2.8 70 TOTAL GENERIC LOW LEVEL WASTE 0 2.8 70 Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract $) $1,142 $1,135 12/01/2017 FTE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 2.7 2.7 Difference Contract ($, K) FTE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (70) 0 (70) (70) $7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 Page1of 1

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to Generic Decommissioning and Reclaimation Fee-Relief Category FY18 FY1 7 Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NEW REACTORS PRODUCT LINE.I PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS. Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safety 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Training Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: International Activities International Cooperation 0 1.5 0 Licensing Decomm. Enviromental Reviews 500 3.0 240 Decomm. Licensing Actions 1,063 24.3 993 Mission IT 45 0.0 247 Uranium Recovery Enviromental Reviews 0 0.0 0 Uranium Recovery Lie. Actions 200 2.0 133 Mission Training Training 0 0.0 0 NSPDP Training 0 1.0 0 Oversight Inspections 0 6.0 0 Research Waste Research 150 1.0 0 Rulemaking Rulemaking 0 1.0 0 Total Direct Resources 1,958 39.8 1,613 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS. International Activities International Cooperation 0 0.5 0 Total Direct Resources 0 0.5 0 Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety 1,958 40.3 1,613 TOTAL GENERIC DECOMMISSIONING & RECLAIMATION 1,958 40.3 1,613 Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract $) $14,621 $14,641 Difference FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 00 0 0.0 2.0 100 2.7 3.0 260 0.0 30.5 70 (6.2) 0.0 (202) 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 3.7 67 (1.7) 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 1.0 0.3 0 5.7 0.0 150 1.0 1.0 0 0.0 40.5 345 (0.7) 0.0 0 0.5 0.0 0 0.5 40.5 345 (0.2) 40.5 345 (0.2) ($20) All decommissioning resources for licensees other than Part 50 power reactors and Part 72 licensees--i.e., site specific+ generic resources--are allocated to the 'generic decommissioning' Fee-Relief category. OCFO then subtracts from this total the estimated Part 170 decommissioning revenue from these licensees. By definition, what's left is 'oeneric.' 12/01/201 7 Page 1 of 1

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to Generic Low Level Waste Surcharge Category FY18 FY17 Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NEW REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/ PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safety 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Rulemaking Rulemaking 0 0.0 0 Training Mission Training 0 0.0 0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Uranium Recovery Licensing Actions 0 0.0 0 Oversight LLW Regulation & Oversight 111 5.0 11 Enforcement 0 0.0 0 Event Evaluation 0 0.0 0 Mission Training Training 0 0.0 0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 Rulemaking Rulemaking 188 1.5 188 Rulemaking Support 0 1.0 0 Total Direct Resources 299 7.5 199 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS.* Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety 299 7.5 199 TOTAL GENERIC LOW LEVEL WASTE 299 7.5 199 Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract $) $3,358 $3,158 12/01/2017 Difference FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 5.0 100 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 1.5 0 0.0 1.0 0 0.0 7.5 100 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 7.5 100 0.0 7.5 100 0.0 $200 Page 1 of 1

Part 171 Annual Fees Fuel Facilities Section 111.B.2.a Table VI Table VII Table VIII The FY 2018 budgeted cost to be recovered in the annual fees assessment to the fuel facility class of licenses [which includes licensees in fee categories 1.A.(1 )(a), 1.A.(1 )(b), 1.A.(2)(a), 1.A.(2)(b), 1.A.(2}{c), 1.E., and 2.A.(1 ), under §171.16] is approximately $29.2 million. This value is based on the full cost of budgeted resources associated with all activities that support this fee class, which is reduced by estimated part 170 collections and adjusted for allocated generic transportation resources, and the fee relief surcharge.

FY 2018 MISSION DIRECT BUDGETED RESOURCES FUEL FACILITY TOTAL ALLOCATIONS CONTRACT CONTRACT $,K FTE $,K FTE NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY 133,776.0 1,969.0 0.0 0.0 NUCLEAR MATERIALS & WASTE SAFETY (no HLW/Gen Fund) 31,941.0 534.0 1,416.7 82.7 CORPORATE 194,451.0 616.0 0.0 0.0 INSPECTOR GENERAL{no DNSFB) 1,810.0 58.0 SUBTOTAL - FEE BASE RESOURCE 361,978.0 3,177.0 1,416.7 82.7 Figures below in $, M (unless otherwise indicated) (1) FY 2018 ALLOCATIONS: equals$, K + FTE*FTE rate (shown below) 35.1 (2) LESS ESTIMATED PART 170 FEE COLLECTIONS 9.3 (3) PART 171 ALLOCATIONS (equals 1 - 2) 25.8 (4) GENERIC TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES (allocated) 1.6 (5) NET PART 171 ALLOCATIONS (after transportation allocated)(equals 3+4) 27.4 (6) FY 2018 TOTAL ALLOCATIONS (after transportation allocation) (equals 2+5) 36.7 (7) % OF BUDGET(% total allocations, excl. fee-relief activities, import/export alloc, small entity) 4.51 % (8) Fee-Relief Adjustment (includes small entity)+ LLW Surcharge 1.79 (9) Fee-Relief Adjustment and LLW Surcharge per licensee (10) Part 171 billing adjustments -0.04 (11) Adjustments 0.0 (12) TOTAL FY 2018 ANNUAL FEE (equals 5+8+10+11) 29.14 (13) Number of Licensees different for different (14) Fee Per License (equals 12/13) categories of licenses; see other worksheets unrounded annual fee amount per license, actual $ rounded annual fee, actual $ FTE RATE (average based on budget data, actual$): 407,810

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources for Fuel Facilities Fee Class FY18 Contract ($,K) FTE PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NEW REACTORS PRODUCT LINE! PRODUCTS: Oversight Training Total Direct Resources 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERA TING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Oversight Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safetv 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Event Response Response Program 30 2.0 International Activities International Cooperation 0 1.0 Licensing Emergency Preparedness 0 1.0 Environmental Reviews 300 1.0 Fukushima NTTF 0 0.0 Licensing Actions 545 27.0 Licensing Support 0 0.0 Security 0 2.0 Oversight Allegations & Investigations 0 0.0 Emergency Preparedness 0 0.0 Enforcement 10 3.0 Inspection 0 30.0 NSPDP Training 0 1.0 Mission IT 0 0.0 Security 312 7.0 Research Longterm Research 0 0.0 Materials Research 0 0.0 Rulemaking Rulemaking (PL) 23 7.0 Rulemaking support 0 0.0 Security 0 0.0 Training Mission Training 125 0.0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 Total Direct Resources 1,345 82.0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: International Activities Multilateral/Bilateral 0 0.0 Oversight Allegations & Investigations 0 0.0 Enforcement Event Evaluation 0 0.0 Inspection 6 0.0 Mission IT 0 0.0 Security 0 Rulemaking Rulemaking 0 0.0 State Tribal and Federal Programs Liaison 0 0.5 Training Mission Training 53 0.2 Total Direct Resources 59

0.7 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Uranium Recovery Env. Reviews 0 0.0 Uranium Recovery Lie. Actions 0 0.0 Mission Training Training 13 0.0 12/01/2017 FY17 Difference Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 1 0.0 0 0.0 30 2.0 0 0.0 0 1.0 0 0.0 0 1.0 0 0.0 167 1.0 133 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 605 27.0 (60) 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 2.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 2.0 0 1.0 0 30.0 0 0.0 0 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 337 7.0 (25) 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 23 7.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 401 0.0 (276) 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1,573 81.0 (228) 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0.0 3 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.5 0 0.0 75 0.2 (22 0.0 78 0.7 (19) 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 16 0.0 (3) 0.0 Page 1 of 2

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources for Fuel Facilities Fee Class FY18 Contract ($,K) FTE PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY Total Direct Resources 13

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Emergency Preparedness 0 0.0 Environmental Reviews 0 0.0 Licensing Support 0 0.0 Rulemaking 0 0.0 Security 0 0.0 Storage Licensing 0 0.0 Transportation Certification 0 0.0 Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety 1,417 82.7 TOTAL FUEL FACILITY 1,417 82.7 Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract $) 35,143 12/01/2017 FY17 Difference Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 16 0.0 (3) 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1,667 81.7 (250) 1.0 1,667 81.7 (250) 1.0 33,900 $1,244 Page 2 of 2

USING 1CW'17 MATRIX Part 171 Amount less BiNing Adjuf.tment LessReclulonAdjustmenl TOTAL $27,386,048

36,092

$27,349,956 Allocation of Part 171 Amount to Safety/Safeguards FEE CATEGORY 1A(1 )(a) SSNM (HEU) 1A(1 )(b) SNM (LEU) 1A(2Xa) 1A(2Xb) 1A(2)(C) 1E 2A(1) LIMITED OPS (Paducah) OTHERS (Gas centrifuge enrichment demonstration) OTHERS (hot cell facility) ENRICHMENT UF6 (Honeywell) ALLOCATION to CATEGORY Fee Category 1A(1)(a) 1A(1)(b) 1A(2)(a) 1A(2)(b) 1A(2)(c) 1E 2A(1) SSNM (HEU) SNM (LEU) LIMITED OPS (Paducah) OTHERS (Gas centrifuge enrichment demonstration) OTHERS (hot cell facility) ENRICHMENT UF6 (Honeywell) TOTAL NUMBER OF LICENSES Cols 1 and 2=budgeted amounts x percent of total effort factor Col 3 =Col 1 + Col 2 Cof 4 "' Total fee-relief x percent of total effort factor Col 5 = Col 3 + Col 4 + Col 5 / number of licensees % of total SAFETY FUEL FACILITY ANNUAL FEES FY 2018 SAFEGUARDS $15,054,298 $12,295,657 Safety 88 70 21 12 191 55.0% (1) $6,936,012 5,517,282 1,655,185 945,820 $15,054,298 EFFORT FACTORS 46.1% 36.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.0% 6.3% 100.0% Safeguards 96 30 23 156 45.0% (2) $7,566,558 2,364,549 1,812,821 551,728 $12,295,657 61.5% 19.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.7% 4.5% 100% TOTAL $27,349,956 184 100 44 19 347 (3) Total $14,502,570 7,881,832 3,468,006 1,497,548 $27,349,956 53.0% 28.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.7% 5.5% 100% FEE-RELIEF $1,790,447 (4) $949,401 $515,979 $0 $0 $0 $227,031 $98,036 $1,790,447 TOTAL ANNUAL FEE $29,140,403 (5) TOTAL ANNUAL FEE PER LICENSE $7,725,986 $2,799,270 $0 $0 $0 $3,695,037 $1,595,584 FY 2018 Annual Fee FY 2017 GRAND Rounded Annual Fee % incJdec. TOTALS $7,726,000 $7,255,000 6.5% 15,451,972 $15,452,000 $2,799,000 $2,629,000 6.5% 8,397,811 $8,397,000 $0 $0 0.0% so $0 $1,366,000 -100.0% $0 $0 $710,000 -100.0% $0 $3,695,000 $3,470,000 6.5% 3,695,037 $3,695,000 $1,596,000 $1,498,000 6.5% 1,595,584 $1,596,000 29,140,403 $29,140,000

FEE CATEGORY LICENSEE DOCKET CATEGORY l.., F,.,., fllbtk:aOon B&W NOO ISNIM2) 70-00027 1Al1ll1) (HEU) NFS (SNM-124) 7C>-<I0143 1Al 1llol LES fSNU.2010, 7C).()l103 1E USEC ACP ISNM-2011~ 1CMl1000 IE u,....... AREVA~-*(SNM-Erdc-20,s,- 70.07015 1E G,-Loo.Erdc-70-07011 1E (SNM-2011)' Fuel Fe.bric.aUon Globol Nuclow (SNll-10ln 7CM>111J 1Al1llbl l"'"C *ANPRk,,..,.. (UU) l(SNM*122n 70-01257 1Al1llbl WNtlnghouN {SHll-1107) 70-01151 1Al1llb) Hone~ fSU8~S2'l -* 2A( 1) Ufl Conwr~ion,*-*---- (SUB-1011) - 2A(11 EN-OemonctratJon - 1A12llbl Hol C.11 1A(2)(c) S*.... HIGH

10 SG*Slf~t IMJOERATE*

5 LOW

1 ONE
0 Changes from Prior Year:

SOLO UF&IMETAL s SG 10 10 10 10 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 I 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 NRC FUEL CYCLE FACILITIES FY 2018 ANNUAL FEES

EFFORT FACTOR MATRIX Sept 2017 PROCESSES UOUll HEU DOWN CONI/EASION ENRICHMENT UH BLEND POWDER PEUET s

SG s SG s SG s SG s SG 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 5 10 5 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 0 0 s 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 s 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 s 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 s 1 1 0 0 5 1 5 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 5 1 5 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 5 1 5 I 0 0 5 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 s s 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E!lH:!2!n; I USECACP ICenNd. tu. not ptOQMdlno.ctl c:c:nt,ucllOn 2 AREVA Eagle

~-tu rWJt proc:NQng wwttrl c:onatnJClon ROOI SCRAP/

SENsmYE BUNOl.E WASTE HOT CELL INFORMATION s SG s SG s so s so 5 5 10 5 1 1 1 10 0 0 10 10 0 0 I 10 0 0 s 1 0 0 0 10 0 0 s I 0 0 0 10 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 10 1 1 5 1 0 0 1 5 1 1 5 1 0 0 1 1 1 I 5 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 JOTAlS 3 Gt:io.i NldNr raa lcera,esporat,My for GLE IMCh'TliWt rea rooo anct dllllll.i n"Offl'IMOn retateo IO t That* DUIS !or en. *s*,, U. llllWAA'e rcOffnabOn c:obnn. c GI009t U,-, Ennctmllnl a lC:tnNd W not pnx:eedlng di c:onlUUdlon. .!, ~ ll(JkJpeS lit IC4W1l8d bul not PfOCHOlng Wl'1 ~ 6 (

:,C.

lfJhlJ 7 H ti 1.1

- I Mreby agrM thllt the optf*tfno licefwff not"' llbow.,. k1 89NfMf'IC with the ope,-*Ong and bfM*~ lkenNe:s In tr.

WM>-Ba-Hd lJc....tng (WBL) syalitm. Olvb~J.v 1/<J/17 P\\f"MttS:NCornm.nc:alo(\\F11hJ ecMS 102017 FUIIIF-*tes Effort Fldorsll. lCII) SUBTOTALS s so 47 46 41 50 21 23 24 16 23 7 23 7 12 7 0 0 0 0 191 156 TOTAL 93 91 44 40 30 30 19 0 0 347 INoC INoC Noc 1.....

Part 171 Annual Fees Uranium Recovery Facilities Section 111.B.2.b Table IX Table X Table XI Table XII The total FY 2018 budgeted cost to be recovered through annual fees assessed to the uranium recovery class [which includes licensees in fee categories 2.A.(2)(a), 2.A.(2)(b), 2.A.(2)(c), 2.A.(2)(d), 2.A.(2)(e), 2.A.(3), 2.A.(4), 2.A.(5) and 18.B., under§ 171.16], is approximately $557,000 (rounded). Of the required annual fee collections, $188,000 is assessed to DOE's Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) under fee category 18.B. The remaining $369,000 (rounded) would be recovered through annual fees assessed to the other licensees in this fee class (i.e., conventional mills, in-situ recovery facilities, 11 e.(2) mill tailings disposal facilities (incidental to existing tailings sites), and a uranium water treatment facility.)

FY 2018 MISSION DIRECT BUDGETED RESOURCES URANIUM RECOVERY TOTAL ALLOCATIONS CONTRACT CONTRACT $,K FTE $,K FTE NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY 133,776.0 1,969.0 0.0 0.0 NUCLEAR MATERIALS & WASTE SAFETY (no HLW/Gen Fund) 31,941.0 534.0 2,283.0 27.5 CORPORATE 194,451.0 616.0 0.0 0.0 INSPECTOR GENERAL(no DNSFB) 1,810.0 58.0 SUBTOTAL - FEE BASE RESOURCE 361,978.0 3,177.0 2,283.0 27.5 Figures below in $, M (unless otherwise indicated) (1) FY 2018 ALLOCATIONS: equals$, K + FTE*FTE rate (shown below) 13.50 (2) LESS ESTIMATED PART 170 FEE COLLECTIONS 13 01 (3) PART 171 ALLOCATIONS (equals 1 - 2) 0.48 (4) GENERIC TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES (allocated) (5) NET PART 171 ALLOCATIONS (after transportation allocated)(equals 3+4) 0.48 (6) FY 2018 TOTAL ALLOCATIONS (after transportation allocation) (equals 2+5) 13.50 (7) % OF BUDGET(% total allocations, excl. fee-relief activities, import/export alloc, small entity) 1.66% (8) Fee-Relief Adjustment (includes small entity)+ LLW Surcharge 0.09 (9) Fee-Relief Adjustment and LLW Surcharge per licensee (10) Part 171 billing adjustments -0.01 (11) Adjustments 0.00 (12) TOTAL FY 2018 ANNUAL FEE (equals 5+8+10+11) 0.56 (13) Number of Licensees different for different (14) Fee Per License (equals 12/13) categories of licenses; see other worksheets unrounded annual fee amount per license, actual $ rounded annual fee, actual $ FTE RATE (average based on budget data, actual$): 407,810

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources for Uranium Recovery Fee Class FY18 Contract ($,K) FTE PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NEW REACTORS PRODUCT LINE! PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safety 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Rulemaking Rulemaking 0 0.0 State Tribal and Federal Programs Agreement States 0 0.0 Liaison 0 1.0 Training Mission Training 0 0.0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 Total Direct Resources 0

1.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Decommissioning Licensing Actions 0 0.8 Uranium Recovery Envir. Reviews 2,196 7.0 Uranium Recovery Lie. Actions 60 14.0 Oversight Inspection 0 4.7 Mission Training Training 27 00 Total Direct Resources 2,283 26.5 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety 2,283 27.5 TOTAL URANIUM RECOVERY 2,283 27.5 Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract $) $13,498 12/01/2017 FY17 Difference Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.8 0 0.0 2,192 7.8 4 (0.8) 127 14.8 (67) (0.8) 0 5.8 0 (1.1) 28 0.0 (1) 0.0 2,347 29.2 (64) (2.7) 0 0.0 0 0.0 2,347 30.2 (64) (2.7) 2,347 30.2 (64) (2.7) $14,262 ($764) Page 1 of 1

Fee Category 18.B. TOTAL ANNUAL FEE AMOUNT (exd. lee-relief adjustment): TOTAL FEE-RELIEF ADJUSTMENT: TOTAL: GROUP 1 Calculation of DOE Annual Fee DOE UMTRCA Budgeted Costs: 10% x (Total Annual Fee Amount (excl. Fee-Relief) less UMTRCA) 10% of Fee-Relief Activities contract$ FTE $0 0.90 URANIUM RECOVERY ANNUAL FEES FY 2018 TOTAL $471,498 85 471 $558,969 Less: Part 170 FTE Rate Receipts $407,810 -$219,868 Total: DOE's Annual Fee Rounded: GROUP 2 Total Fee $147,161 $32,434 $8,547 S188, 141 $188,000 Calculation of Annual Fee Amount for Remaining UR Licensees FY 2018 Total Fee Remaining Annual Fee Amount (exd. Fee-Relief Adjustment): $291,903 $76,924 CALCULATION OF ANNUAL FEE AMOUNTS BY CATEGORY: Type of Site Conventional & Heap Leach Mills Basic ln*situ Recovery Facilities Expanded ln*situ Recovery Facilities In.situ Recovery Resin Facilities Resin Toll Milling Facilities Facilities for Disposal of 11 e(2) Materials Disposal Incident to Operation at Licensed Facilities Uranium Water Treatment Facility TOTAL Col. 3= Col. 1 x Col. 2 Col. 5= Col. 4 x Group 2 Total Base Fee Col. 6= Col. 5 /Col. 1 Fee Category 2.A.(2)(a) 2.A.(2)(b) 2.A.(2)(c) 2.A.(2)(d) 2.A.(2)(e) 2.A.(3) 2.A.(4) 2.A.(5) Col. 7= Col. 4 x Group 2 Fee* Relief Adjustment Amount/Col. Col. 8= Col. 6 + Col. 7 Remaining Fee Relief Adjustment (90%): (1) Number of Licenses 0 0 0 Total: $368,828 (2) (3) Category Total Benefit Benefit Value 150 150 190 950 215 215 85 25 665 85 25 1,425 (4) (5) Total base Percent annual fee 11 % $30,727 67% $194,602 15% $44,042 0% $0 0% $0 0% $0 6% $17,412 2% $5,121 100% $291,903 (6) (7) (8) FY 2018 Annual Fee Per License Annual Fee GRAND Base Fee Relief Total Rounded FY17 Fee '!, Inc.Idec. TOTAL $30,727 $8,097 $38,824 $38,800 $38,900 -0.26% $38,824 $38,920 $10,257 $49,177 $49,200 $49,200 0.00% $245,885 $44,042 $11,606 $55,648 $55,600 $55,700 -0.18% $55,648 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA $0 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA $0 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA $0 $17,412 $4,588 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 0.00% $22,000 $5,121 $1,350 $6,471 $6,500 $6,500 0.00% $6,471 $368,828 DOE $188 141 Total $558,969

URANIUM RECOVERY MA TRIX OF REGULA TORY BENEFIT BY CA TE GORY OF LICENSEE includes facilities in operational status (even if in standby), excludes possession only licensees TO DETERMINE ANNUAL FEES FOR FY18 FEE RULE I I I TYPE OF OPERATING ACTIVITY Ooerations Waste Ooerations Groundwater Protection weiaht = weight= weight= 10 5 10 No. of Licensees Total Score Total ~core. Total ~core Total Score all Percent total ,=benefit score

I t=benefit score
I t=benefit score Total Score all Licensees (!!r Annual Fee Tvoe of Site Fee Catenorv Benefit weinht\\

Benefit weinht\\ Benefit

weinht\\

activities catenorv ner Licensee Canventional and Heap Leach Mills 2(A)2a 1 5 50 10 50 5 50 150 150 11 % 0.1053 Basic In Situ Recovery Facilities 2(Al2b 5 9 90 2 10 9 90 190 950 13% 0.6667 Expanded In Situ Recovery Facilities 2(A)2c 1 10 100 3 15 10 100 215 215 15% 0.1509 In-situ Recovery Resin Facilities 2(A)2d 0 8 80 2 10 9 90 180 0 13% 0.0000 Resin Toll Milling Facilities 2(A)2e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0.0000 Facilities for Disposal of 11e(2) Materials 2(A)3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0.0000 Disposal Incident to Operation at Licensed Facilities 2(Al4 1 2 20 5 25 4 40 85 85 6% 0.0596 Uranium Water Treatment Facility 2(Al5 1 1 10 3 15 0 0 25 25 2% 0.0175 Grand Total 1425 1.0000 Benefit factors under "Operations", "Waste Operations", and "Groundwater Level of Reaulatorv Benefit-Scale of Protection" reflect the regulatory benefit to each licensee in the fee category 0 to 10 (examolesl from generic uranium recovery program activities. None 0 Minor 2 Some 5 Sianificant 10 I I I I I

Part 171 Annual Fees Operating Power Reactors Section 111.B.2.c Table XIII The budgeted costs to be recovered through annual fees to power reactors are divided equally among the 99 power reactors licensed to operate. This results in a FY 2018 annual fee of $4,559,000 per reactor. Additionally, each power reactor licensed to operate would be assessed the FY 2018 spent fuel storage/reactor decommissioning annual fee of $225,000. This results in a total FY 2018 annual fee of $4,784,000 for each power reactor licensed to operate.

FY 2018 MISSION DIRECT BUDGETED RESOURCES POWER REACTORS TOTAL ALLOCATIONS CONTRACT CONTRACT $,K FTE $,K FTE NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY 133,776.0 1,969.0 86,885.0 1,480.2 NUCLEAR MATERIALS & WASTE SAFETY (no HLW/Gen Fund) 31,94 1.0 534.0 877.7 4.0 CORPORATE 194,451.0 616.0 0.0 0.0 INSPECTOR GENERAL(no DNSFB) 1,810.0 58.0 SUBTOTAL - FEE BASE RESOURCE 361,978.0 3,177.0 87,762.7 1,484.2 Figures below in $, M (unless otherwise indicated) (1) FY 2018 ALLOCATIONS: equals$, K + FTE*FTE rate (shown below) 693.0 (2) LESS ESTIMATED PART 170 FEE COLLECTIONS 247.1 (3) PART 171 ALLOCATIONS (equals 1 - 2) 445.9 (4) GENERIC TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES (allocated) 0.3 (5) NET PART 171 ALLOCATIONS (after transportation allocated)(equals 3+4) 446.2 (6) FY 2018 TOTAL ALLOCATIONS (after transportation allocation) (equals 2+5) 693.4 (7) % OF BUDGET(% total allocations, excl. fee-relief activities, import/export alloc, small entity) 85.18% (8) Fee-Relief Adjustment (includes small entity) + LLW Surcharge 5.8 (9) Fee-Relief Adjustment and LLW Surcharge per licensee 0.06 (10) Part 171 billing adjustments -0.68 (11) Adjustments 0.0 (12) TOTAL FY 2018 ANNUAL FEE (equals 5+8+10+11) 451.3 (13) Number of Licensees 99 (14) Fee Per License (equals 12/13) 4.56 unrounded annual fee amount per license, actual $ 4,558,884 rounded annual fee, actual $ 4,559,000 FTE RATE (average based on budget data, actual$): 407,810

PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NEW REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/ PRODUCTS: International Activiti es International Cooperation Licensing Advanced Reactors Combined Licenses Design Certification Ea~y Site Permit Emergency Preparedness Fukushima NTIF Licensing Actions Licensing Support Mission IT New Reactor Facilities NSPDP Training Operator Licensing Pre-Application Reviews Part 50 Security Oversight Allegations & Investigations Construction Inspection Emergency Preparedness Enforcement Mission IT NSPDP Training Part50 Security Vendor Inspection Research Adv. Reactors Research Long term Research New Reactors Research Rulemaking Rulemaking (PL) Security Rulemaking Support Training Mission Training Mission IT NSPDP Training Total Direct Resources PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Event Response Mission IT Other Response Activities Response Operations Response Program International Activities International Cooperation Licensing Emergency Preparedness Generic Issues Program Fukushima NTIF/Japan Lessons Learned License Renewal Licensing Actions Licensing Support Mission IT NSPDP Training Operator Licensing Research & Test Reactors Security Oversight Allegations & Investigations Emergency Preparedness Enforcement Event Evaluation Fukushima NTIF Inspection Mission IT NSPDP Training Research & Test Reactor lnsc. 12/01/2017 Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to Power Reactors Fee Class FY18 Contract ($,K) FTE FY17 Contract ($,K) 60 5.0 60 0 0.0 0 0 1.0 275 4,302 69.0 1,821 1,380 19.0 214 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 325 30.0 343 2,827 55.0 1,158 1,999 5.0 1,676 0 0.0 0 0 2.0 0 0 11.0 0 0 7.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 9.9 0 210 59.0 270 0 1.0 0 6 3.0 6 0 0.0 0 0 1.0 0 0 0.0 0 600 4.0 600 80 26.0 70 0 0.0 400 0 0.0 0 3,236 12.0 1,875 100 7.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 1.0 0 1,021 10.0 649 30 0.0 30 0 0.0 0 16,176 337.9 9,447 7,070 11.0 6,031 0 0.0 986 175 19.0 300 0 15.0 0 60 16.0 0 0 10.0 0 0 0.0 0 1,650 35.0 1,650 1,135 38.0 1,095 4,199 160.0 3,527 3,956 55.0 3,607 244 00 244 0 4.0 0 255 35.0 255 0 0 0 750 13 634 25 49.9 25 0 21.0 0 116 16.6 117 0 41.0 55 0 5.0 0 3,246 325.0 2,996 3,039 6.0 4,762 0 5.0 0 0 0.0 0 Difference FTE Contract ($, K) FTE 5.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 19.0 (275) (18.0 730 2,481 (4.0) 19.0 1,166 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 32.0 (18) (2 0) 52.0 1,669 3.0 5.0 323 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 2.0 0 0.0 11.0 0 0.0 1.0 0 6.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 11.0 0 (1.1) 55.0 (60) 4.0 1.0 0 0.0 3.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 1.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 4.0 0 0.0 26.0 10 0.0 1.0 (400) (1.0) 0.0 0 0.0 11.0 1,361 1.0 5.0 100 2.0 0.0 0 0.0 1.0 0 0.0 12.0 372 (2.0) 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 350.0 6,729 (121) 5.0 1,039 6.0 0.0 (986) 0.0 20.0 (125) (1 0) 15.0 0 0.0 15.4 60 0.6 10.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 67.0 0 (32.0) 44.0 40 (6.0) 146.0 672 14.0 43.0 349 12.0 0.0 0 0.0 2.0 0 2.0 35.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 13 116 0.0 51.0 0 (1.1) 21.0 0 0.0 18.8 (1) (2 2) 43.0 (55) (20) 6.0 0 (1 0) 337.0 250 (12 0) 8.0 (1,723) (2.0) 13.0 0 (8.0) 0.0 0 0.0 Page 1 of 3

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to Power Reactors Fee Class FY18 Contract ($,K) FTE FY17 Contract ($,K) Security 3,659 58.0 3,559 Vendor Inspection 0 2.0 0 Research Consequence Analvsis & Hlth Effects 0 0.0 0 Aging & Materials Research 9,319 20.0 0 Digital l&C & Electrical Res. 0 0.0 0 Engineering Research 5,910 24.0 0 Fire Safety Research 0 0.0 0 Fukushima NTIF 0 0.0 0 Generic Issues & Oper. Exp. 225 4.0 225 International Research 0 0.0 0 Longterm Research 0 0.0 0 Materials Performance Research 0 0.0 0 Mission IT 1,747 2.0 1,477 NSPDP Training 0 2.0 0 Operational Events Analysis 0 0.0 0 Reactor Research 0 7.0 20,031 Reactor Safety Codes & Analysis 0 0.0 0 Risk Analysis 15,752 51.0 0 Systems Analysis Research 3,842 19.0 0 Seismic & Structural Research 0 0.0 0 Rulemaklng Fukushima NTIF/Japan Lessons Learned 0 0.0 150 Rulemaking (Pl) 325 32.0 325 Emergency Preparedness 0 0.0 0 Rulemaking Support 350 16.0 250 Security 0 0.0 0 Training Fukushima NTIF/Japan Lessons Learned 0 0.0 0 Mission IT 116 0.0 122 Mission Training 3,544 24.8 3,188 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 70,709 1142.3 55,61 1 Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safetv 86,885 1480.2 65,058 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Research Materials Research 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS. International Activities Multilateral/Bilateral 0 0.0 0 Oversight Inspection 6 0.0 3 Rulemaklng Rulemaking 0 0.0 0 State, Tribal and Federal Programs Liaison 0 1.0 0 Training Mission Training 145 0.2 205 Total Direct Resources 151 1.2 208 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Decomm. Licensing Actions 0 1.0 0 Uranium Recovery Env. Reviews 0 0.0 0 Uranium Recovery Lie. Actions 0 0.0 0 Mission Training Training 7 0.0 8 Total Direct Resources 7 1.0 8 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS. International Activities International Cooperation 0 0.0 0 Licensing Emergency Preparedness 0 0 0 Environmental Reviews 0 0 0 Licensing Support 0 0 0 Mission IT 0 0 0 Security 0 0 0 Storage Licensing 0 1 0 Transportation Certification 0 0 0 12/01/2017 Difference FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 58.0 100 0.0 2.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 9,319 20.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 5,910 24.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 4.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 2.0 270 0.0 2.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 116.0 (20,031) (109.0) 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 15,752 51.0 0.0 3,842 19.0 0.0 0 0.0 5.0 (150) (50) 32.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 14.0 100 2.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 (6) 0.0 24.8 356 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 1,173.0 15,098 (30.7) 1,523.0 21,827 (42.8) 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 1.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.2 (60) 0.0 1.2 (57) 0.0 1.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 (1) 0.0 1.0 (1) 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 Page 2 of 3

Research Waste Research Rulemaklng Rulemaking (PL) Travel Mission Travel Training Mission Training Total Direct Resources Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety TOTAL POWER REACTORS Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to Power Reactors Fee Class FY18 FY17 Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($, K) 0 0.0 685 720 0.8 9 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 720 1.8 694 878 4.0 910 87,763 1,484.2 65,968 Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full oost of FTE + mission direct contract $) 693,034 670,268 Difference FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 3.0 (685) (3.0) 2.5 711 (1 7) 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 6.5 26 (4.7) 8.7 (32) (4.7) 1,531.7 21,795 (47 5) $22,766 The budgetary resources allocated to Power Reactors Fee Class from Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety Program include (but are not limited to) activities pertaining to analysis, data collection, modeling future strategies for disposal of spent fuel and high level waste and monitoring developments in the evolving national waste management strategy. In addition to tribal program activities, dosimeter costs and materials training widely attended by all agency staff including inspectors benefitting numerous facets of the agency's mission. 12/01 /2017 Page 3 of 3

OPERATING POWER REACTOR ANNUAL FEE FY 2018 NUMBER OF POWER REACTORS LICENSED TO OPERATE: (by Nuclear Steam System Supplier & Design Type) Westinghouse General Electric Combustion Engineering Babcock & Wilcox TOT AL REACTORS DETERMINATION OF ANNUAL FEE: TOTAL BUDGETED COSTS FOR OPERATING POWER REACTORS (INCLUDES NON-FEE ACTIVITIES) ANNUAL FEE PER REACTOR (rounded) (BUDGETED COSTS DIVIDED BY 100 OPERATING POWER REACTORS) PLUS SPENT FUEL STORAGE/ REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING ANNUAL FEE TOTAL ANNUAL FEE PER LICENSE 48 34 11 6 99 $693,033,705 4,559,000 $225,000 $4,784,000 12/01/2017

Part 171 Annual Fees Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning Section 111.B.2.d Table XIV For FY 2018, budgeted costs of approximately $27.4 million for spent fuel storage/reactor decommissioning are to be recovered through annual fees assessed to part 50 power reactors, and to part 72 licensees who do not hold a part 50 license. Those reactor licensees that have ceased operations and have no fuel onsite are not subject to these annual fees. The required annual fee recovery amount is divided equally among 122 licensees, resulting in a FY 2018 annual fee of $225,000 per licensee.

FY 2018 MISSION DIRECT BUDGETED RESOURCES SPENT FUEL STORAGE/ REACTOR DECOMM. TOTAL ALLOCATIONS CONTRACT CONTRACT $,K FTE $,K FTE NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY 133,776.0 1,969.0 2.0 0.4 NUCLEAR MATERIALS & WASTE SAFETY (no HLW/Gen Fund) 31,941.0 534.0 4,998.7 72.2 CORPORATE 194,451.0 616.0 0.0 0.0 INSPECTOR GENERAL(no DNSFB) 1,810.0 58.0 SUBTOTAL - FEE BASE RESOURCE 361,978.0 3,177.0 5,000.7 72.6 Figures below in $, M (unless otherwise indicated) (1) FY 2018 ALLOCATIONS: equals$, K + FTE*FTE rate (shown below) 34.6 (2) LESS ESTIMATED PART 170 FEE COLLECTIONS 8.3 (3) PART 171 ALLOCATIONS (equals 1 - 2) 26.3 (4) GENERIC TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES (allocated) 0.9 (5) NET PART 171 ALLOCATIONS (after transportation allocated)(equals 3+4) 27.2 (6) FY 2018 TOTAL ALLOCATIONS (after transportation allocation) (equals 2+5) 35.5 (7) % OF BUDGET(% total allocations, excl. fee-relief activities, import/export alloc, small entity) 4.36% (8) Fee-Relief Adjustment (includes small entity)+ LLW Surcharge 0.225 (9) Fee-Relief Adjustment and LLW Surcharge per licensee 0.00 (10) Part 171 billing adjustments -0.03 (11) Adjustments 0.0 (12) TOTAL FY 2018 ANNUAL FEE (equals 5+8+10+11) 27.41 (13) Number of Licensees 122 (14) Fee Per License (equals 12113) 0.225 unrounded annual fee amount per license, actual $ 224,657 rounded annual fee, actual $ 225,000 FTE RATE (average based on budget data, actual $): 407,81 0

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning Fee Class FY1 8 FY17 Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFET'r BUSINESS LINE: NEW REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/ PRODUCTS: Oversight Allegations & Investigations 0 0.1 0 Total Direct Resources 0 0.1 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Oversight Allegations & Investigations 0 0.1 0 Emergency Preparedness 0 0.0 0 Enforcement 1 0.2 1 Event Evaluation 0 0.0 0 Inspection 0 00 0 Mission IT 1 0.0 1 Research & Test Reactor lnsp. 0 0.0 0 Security 0 0.0 0 Total Direct Resources 2 0.3 2 Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safety 2 0.4 2 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Oversight Allegations & lnvestiagtions 0 0.1 0 Enforcement 2 0.4 2 Inspection 6 0.0 3 Rulemaking Rulemaking 0 0.0 0 State, Tribal and Federal Pro. Liaison 0 0.0 0 Training Mission Training 30 0.0 42 Total Direct Resources 38 0.5 47 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: International International Cooperation 0 0.5 0 Licensing Decommissioning Licensing Actions 0 1.0 0 Oversight Inspection 0 6.3 0 Mission Training Training 240 0.0 258 Total Direct Resources 240 7.8 258 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: International Activities International Cooperation 90 1.0 90 Licensing Emergency Preparedness 0 1 0 Environmental Reviews 2207 4 348 Fukushima NTIF 0 0 0 Licensing Actions 155 1 15 Licensing Support 500 11 78 Mission IT 344 0.6 262 Security 0 3 0 Storage Licensing 600 23 135 Transportation Certification 0 0 0 Oversight Security 0 3 0 Inspection 0 8.5 0 Research 12/01/2017 Difference FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 0.0 0 0.1 0.0 0 0.1 0.0 0 0.1 0.0 0 0.0 0.1 0 0.1 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.1 (0) 0.2 0.1 (0) 0.3 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.1 0.3 0 0.1 0.0 3 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 (12) 0.0 0.3 (9) 0.2 1.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 1.0 9.9 0 (3.6) 0.0 (18) 0.0 10.9 (18) (3.1) 0.5 0 0.5 0 0 1.0 4 1,859 0.0 0 0 0.0 1 140 0.0 8 422 3.0 0.6 82 0.0 3 0 0.0 20 465 3.0 0 0 0.0 2 0 1.0 8.5 0 0.0 Page 1 of 2

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources Allocated to Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning Fee Class FY18 FY17 Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) Waste Research 730 2.0 1,303 Rulemaking Rulemaking (PL) 0 4.0 0 Rulemaking Support 80 0.8 1 Security 0 0.0 0 Training Mission Training 15 0.0 13 NSPDP Training 0 1.0 0 Travel Mission Travel 0 0 0 Total Direct Resources 4,721 63.9 2,245 Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety 4,998.6 72.2 2,549.9 TOTAL SPENT FUEL STORAGE & REACTOR DECOMM. 5,001 72.6 2,552 Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract $) $34,608 $29,538 12/01/2017 Difference FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 3.0 (573) (1.0) 4.0 0 0.0 2.5 79 (1.7) 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 2 0.0 0.0 0 1.0 0 0 0.0 57.1 2,476 6.8 68.3 2,449 3.9 68.4 2,449 4.2 $5,070 Page 2 of 2

SPENT FUEL STORAGE/REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING ANNUAL FEE FY 2018 LICENSES SUBJECT TO THE ANNUAL FEE: Operating Power Reactor Licensees: 99 Power Reactors in Decommissioning or Possession Only Status with Fuel Onsite Reactor Big Rock Point Indian Point, Unit 1 Dresden, Unit 1 Haddam Neck Humboldt La Crosse Maine Yankee Millstone 1 Rancho Seco San Onofre, Unit 1 Yankee Rowe Zion 1 Zion 2 Crystal River 3 Kewaunee San Onofre, Unit 2 San Onofre, Unit 3 Vermont Yankee Fort Calhoun Total No. of Reactors in decommissioning or possession only status with fuel onsite: 19 Part 72 Licensees without a Part 50 License Ft. St. Vrain GE Morris Foster Wheeler Environmental Corp. Trojan Total Part 72 licenses: 4 Docket No. 50-155 50-003 50-010 50-213 50-133 50-409 50-309 50-245 50-312 50-206 50-029 50-295 50-304 50-302 50-305 50-361 50-362 50-271 50-285 72-009 72-001 72-025 72-017 The annual fee is determined by dividing the total budgeted costs of approximately $34.6 million (including the fee-relief activities) by the total number of licensees (122). This results in an annual fee (rounded) of $225,000 per license. 12/01/2017

-Part 171 Annual Fees Research and Test Reactors Section 111.B.2.e Table XV Approximately $325,000 in budgeted costs is to be recovered through annual fees assessed to the research and test reactor class of licenses for FY 2018. This required annual fee recovery amount is divided equally among the four research and test reactors subject to annual fees, and results in a FY 2018 annual fee of $81,300 for each licensee.

FY 2018 MISSION DIRECT BUDGETED RESOURCES TEST AND RESEARCH REACTORS TOTAL ALLOCATIONS CONTRACT CONTRACT $,K FTE $,K FTE NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY 133,776.0 1,969.0 305.0 6.6 NUCLEAR MATERIALS & WASTE SAFETY (no HLW/Gen Fund) 31,941.0 534.0 0.6 0.0 CORPORATE 194,451.0 616.0 0.0 0.0 INSPECTOR GENERAL(no DNSFB) 1,810.0 58.0 SUBTOTAL - FEE BASE RESOURCE 361,978.0 3,177.0 305.6 6.6 Figures below in $, M (unless otherwise indicated) (1) FY 2018 ALLOCATIONS: equals$, K + FTE*FTE rate (shown below) 2.997 (2) LESS ESTIMATED PART 170 FEE COLLECTIONS 2.722 (3) PART 171 ALLOCATIONS (equals 1 - 2) 0.275 (4) GENERIC TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES (allocated) 0.034 (5) NET PART 171 ALLOCATIONS (after transportation allocated)(equals 3+4) 0.309 (6) FY 2018 TOTAL ALLOCATIONS (after transportation allocation) (equals 2+5) 3.031 (7) % OF BUDGET(% total allocations, excl. fee-relief activities, import/export alloc, small entity ) 0.37% (8) Fee-Relief Adjustment (includes small entity) + LLW Surcharge 0.01 92 (9) Fee-Relief Adjustment and LLW Surcharge per licensee 0.0048 (10) Part 171 billing adjustments 0.00 (11) Adjustments 0.0 (12) TOTAL FY 2018 ANNUAL FEE (equals 5+8+10+11) 0.325 (13) Number of Licensees 4 (14) Fee Per License (equals 12/13) 0.0813 unrounded annual fee amount per license, actual $ 81,331 rounded annual fee, actual $ 81,300 FTE RA TE (average based on budget data, actual $): 407,810

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources for Test and Research Reactors Fee Class FY18 Contract ($, K) FTE PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY la, 1<>1Ncc,c, I l"C* NFW DCAt'TOR~ PRODUCT LINE/ PRODUCTS: Oversight Allegations & Investigations 0 0.0 Construction Inspection 0 0.0 Emergency Preparedness 0 0.0 Enforcement 0 0.0 Mission lT 0 0.0 Part50 0 0.0 Security 0 0.0 Vendor Inspection 0 0.0 Training Mission Training 0 0.0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 Total Direct Resources 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Emergency Preparedness 0 0.0 Generic Issues Program 0 0.0 Japan Lessons Learned 0 0.0 License Renewal 0 0.0 Licensing Actions 0 0.0 Licensing Support 0 0.0 Mission IT 0 0.0 Operator Licensing 0 0.0 Research & Test Reactors 275 6.1 Security 0 0 Oversight Allegations & Investigations 0 0.0 Emergency Preparedness 0 0.0 Enforcement 1 0.0 Event Evaluation 0 0.0 Inspection 0 0.0 Mission IT 1 0.0 Research & Test Reactor lnsp. 0 0.5 Rulemaklng Rulemaking (PL) 0 0.0 Training Mission Training 28 0.0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 Total Direct Resources 305 6.6 Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safety 305

6.6 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Oversight Inspection 1 0.0 Training Mission Training 0 0.0 Total Direct Resources 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety 1 0.0 TOTAL TEST & RESEARCH REACTORS 305.6 6.6 Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract $) $2,997 12/01/2017 FY17 Difference Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 367 3.7 (92) 2.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.3 0 0.2 34 0.0 (34) 0.0 3 0.0 26 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 403 4.0 (98) 2.6 403 4.0 (98) 2.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 403 4.0 (98) 2.6 $1,982 $1,016 Page 1 of 1

TEST AND RESEARCH REACTOR ANNUAL FEE FY 2018 FEE RULE DETERMINATION OF THE FY 2018 ANNUAL FEE: TEST AND RESEARCH REACTORS SUBJECT TO ANNUAL FEES (See note)

1. Dow Chemical - TRIGA MARK I

2. AEROTEST

3. GE, NTR

4. NIST DETERMINATION OF ANNUAL FEE BUDGETED COSTS ANNUAL FEE PER LICENSE (rounded)

(Budgeted costs divided by number of test and research reactor licensees subject to annual fee) License No. R-108 R-98 R-33 TR-5 $325,326 $81,300 Docket No. 50-264 50-228 50-73 50-184 12/01/2017

Part 171 Annual Fees Rare Earth Facilities Section 111.8.2.f During FY 2016 NRC did receive an application under the Rare Earth fee class 2.A. (2)(f). However, no FY 2018 budgetary resources were allocated to this fee class, and did not require an annual fee to be established. NRC revised the fee category for this fee class from 2.A.(2)(c) to 2.A.(2)(f) in FY 2009.

FY 2018 MISSION DIRECT BUDGETED RESOURCES RARE EARTH TOTAL ALLOCATIONS CO NTRACT CONTRACT $,K FTE $,K FTE NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY 133,776.0 1,969.0 0.0 0.0 NUCLEAR MATERIALS & WASTE SAFETY (no HLW/Gen Fund) 31,941.0 534.0 0.0 0.0 CORPORATE 194,451.0 616.0 0.0 0.0 INSPECTOR GENERAL(no DNSFB) 1,810.0 58.0 SUBTOTAL* FEE BASE RESOURCE 361,978.0 3,177.0 0.0 0.0 Figures below in $, M (unless otherwise indicated) (1) FY 2018 ALLOCATIONS: equals$, K + FTE*FTE rate (shown below) 0.00 (2) LESS ESTIMATED PART 170 FEE COLLECTIONS 0.00 (3) PART 171 ALLOCATIONS (equals 1 - 2) 0.00 (4) GENERIC TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES (allocated) (5) NET PART 171 ALLOCATIONS (after transportation allocated)(equals 3+4) 0.00 (6) FY 2018 TOTAL ALLOCATIONS (after transportation allocation) (equals 2+5) 0.00 (7) % OF BUDGET(% total allocations, excl. fee-relief activities, import/export alloc, small entity) 0.00% (8) Fee-Relief Adjustment (includes small entity)+ LLW Surcharge 0.000 (9) Fee-Relief Adjustment and LLW Surcharge per licensee (10) Part 171 billing adjustments 0.000 (11) Adjustments 0.0000 (12) TOTAL FY 20~8 ANNUAL FEE (equals 5+8+10+11) 0.0000 (13) Number of Licensees different for (14) Fee Per License (equals 12/13) different categories of licenses; see other worksheets unrounded annual fee amount per license, actual $ rounded annual fee, actual $ FTE RATE (average based on budget data, actual $): 407,810

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources for Rare Earth Fee Class FY18 FY17 Difference Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,Kl FTE PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NEW REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/ PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 0.0 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safety 0 0.0 0 0.0 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 0.0 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS PRUDUc;T LINEIPRUDUc;T::;: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 0.0 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Decommissioninq Licensing Actions 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Uranium Recovery Envir. Reviews 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Uranium Recovery Lie. Actions 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Oversight Inspection 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Mission Traininq Trainino 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 0.0 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 TOTAL RARE EARTH 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract$) $0 $0.0 $0 Page 1 of 1

Part 171 Annual Fees Materials Users Section 111.B.2.g Table XVI The following fee categories under §171.16 are included in this fee class: 1.C., 1.D., 1.F., 2.B., 2.F., 3.A. through 3.S., 4.A. through 4.C., 5.A., 5.B., 6.A., 7.A. through 7.C., 8.A., 9.A. through 9.D., 16, and 17. The annual fee for these categories of materials users licenses is developed as follows: Annual fee = Constant x [Application Fee + (Average Inspection Cost/ Inspection Priority)] + Inspection Multiplier x (Average Inspection Cost/ Inspection Priority)+ Unique Category Costs. To equitably and fairly allocate the $34.2 million in FY 2018 budgeted costs to be recovered in annual fees assessed to the approximately 2,600 diverse materials users licensees, the NRC continues to calculate the annual fees for each fee category within this class based on the 10 CFR part 170 application fees and estimated inspection costs for each fee category. Because the application fees and inspection costs are indicative of the complexity of the material license, this approach provides a proxy for allocating the generic and other regulatory costs to the diverse fee categories. This fee calculation method also considers the inspection frequency (priority), which is indicative of the safety risk and resulting regulatory costs associated with the categories of licenses.

FY 2018 MISSION DIRECT BUDGETED RESOURCES MATERIALS TOTAL ALLOCATIONS CONTRACT ~ONTRACT $,K FTE $,K FTE NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY 133,776.0 1,969.0 18.0 0.0 NUCLEAR MATERIALS & WASTE SAFETY (no HLW/Gen Fund) 31,941.0 534.0 598.0 79.3 CORPORATE 194,451.0 616.0 00 0 0 INSPECTOR GENERAL(no DNSFB) 1,810.0 58.0 SUBTOTAL - FEE BASE RESOURCE 361,978.0 3,177.0 616.0 79.3 Figures below in $, M (unless otherwise indicated) (1) FY 2018 ALLOCATIONS: equals$, K + FTE*FTE rate (shown below) 33.0 (2) LESS ESTIMATED PART 170 FEE COLLECTIONS 1.0 (3) PART 171 ALLOCATIONS (equals 1 - 2) 32.0 (4) GENERIC TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES (allocated) 1.6 (5) NET PART 171 ALLOCATIONS (after transportation allocated)(equals 3+4) 33.6 (6) FY 2018 TOTAL ALLOCATIONS (after transportation allocation) (equals 2+5) 34.6 (7) % OF BUDGET(% total allocations, excl. fee-relief activities, import/export alloc, small entity) 3.39% (8) Fee-Relief Adjustment (includes small entity) + LLW Surcharge 0.6 (9) Fee-Relief Adjustment and LLW Surcharge per licensee (10) Part 171 billing adjustments -0 03 (11) Adjustments 0.0 (12) TOTAL FY 2018 ANNUAL FEE (equals 5+8+10+11) 34.20 (13) Number of Licensees different for (14) Fee Per License (equals 12/13) different categories of licenses; see other worksheets unrounded annual fee amount per license, actual $ rounded annual fee, actual $ FTE RATE (average based on budget data, actual$): 407,810

Mission Direct Budgeted Resources for Materials Fee Class FY18 Contract ($,K) FTE PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NEW REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/ PRODUCTS: Total Direct Resources 0

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Training Mission Training 18 0.0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 Total Direct Resources 18 0.0 Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safety 18

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Training Mission Training 19 0.0 NSPDP Training 0 0.0 Total Direct Resources 19

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NUCLEAR MATERIALS USERS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Event Response Response Operations 0 0.3 Response Programs 0 0.3 International Activities International Cooperation 0 3.6 Licensing Licensing Actions 27 24.1 Licensing Support 45 0.0 Mission IT 50 0.0 NSPDP Training 0 2.0 Security 0 1.0 Oversight Allegations & Investigations 0 11.0 Enforcement 41 10.0 Event Evaluation 188 3.0 Inspection 1 17.4 Mission IT 0 0.0 Security 0 0.0 Research Materials Research 0 0.3 Rulemaking Rulemaking 0 3.7 Rulemaking Support 0 0.8 State Tribal and Federal Programs Agreement States 0 0.0 Liaison 0 0.1 Travel 0 00 Training Mission Training 208 0.7 NSPDP Training 0 1.0 Total Direct Resources 559 79.3 PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Decommissioning Licensing Actions 0 0.0 Uranium Recovery Lie. Actions 0 0.0 Mission Training Training 20 0.0 Total Direct Resources 20

0.0 PROGRAM

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Licensing Emergency Preparedness 0 0.0 Environmental Reviews 0 0.0 Licensing Support 0 0.0 12/01/2017 FY17 Difference Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 0 00 0 0.0 4 0.0 14 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 0.0 14 0.0 4 0.0 14 0.0 27 0.0 (8) 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 27 0.0 (8) 0.0 0 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 3.6 0 0.0 43 27.1 (16) (3.0) 45 0.0 45 0.1 5 (0.1) 0 2.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 1.0 0 11.2 0 (0.2) 41 11.3 (0) (1.3) 193 3.3 (6) (0.3) 1 21.2 1 (3.8) 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.3 0 1.7 0 2.0 0 0.8 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 293 0.7 (85) 0.0 0 0.0 0 1.0 661 83.7 (102) (4.4) 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 24 0.0 (4) 0.0 24 0.0 (4) 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Page 1 of 2

Mission IT Security Storage Licensing Transportation Certification Total Direct Resources Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety TOTAL MATERIAL USERS Mission Direct Budgeted Resources for Materials Fee Class FY18 Contract {$,K) FTE 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 598 79.3 616.0 79.3 Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract $) $32,955 12/01/2017 FY17 Difference Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 712 83.7 (1 14) (4.4) 716 83.7 (100) (4.4) $33,738 ($783) Page 2 of 2

REBASEUNE I Billed I t FY2017 I I I I NUMBER Of LICENSE! I I FY2011 Billed at FY2018 '"' Agru.. Sb~ Trans!OH I I (1) Totalfor (2) I I Pl I Part170hn($) LJ FY 2018 Materials Users Annual Fees I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (3) I (9) (10) (1 1) (1~ (13) (14) (1S) Cale.or Genaral I ~-~P.rt+-11-1~a,~.. -,-"-P-w-Lk~~-.,-,=.,~-~--1c--~ Total EllK11~ ~,.-,..~e"°"~K~tio-*-* -+-t---,c' Number ~ _J ln,p. of ln,p. Tot.al Adju1tmenl P'tf UcenH Annwil ..._,al LL.TI fN pef BaHfN I I Small Entity 12/0112017 I I LicenMFNCaieg<<y Adjusl FY2018 Appl. ln1p. Multiple MultipJ. Gena-al Unique ln1pecilon p.-licenM Sun:hatge fN~tollel 1icenM BaM FM TOTAL Sm Entity SmEnlity Sub1idy SPECIAL NUc:LEAR MATERIAL: 1C.l~Gaugn

10. ~SM.4lnscrlticalq.ardy

28. SINlding 2C. Eumpt 0!stributlor¥SM

20. 0islJibutiontoGenwat~SM 2E. Manufactumg Oiwt>ution 2F. OlherSouretMaterbls

~ TMATERIA~L~, ------ (S,KI ($,KJ (No. of

-~

~~ (Tcul ,~;;;:.~ nsplfflinsp Materials r..rmp licenws x (No. of -., SH priority) SH LLW priorify)Sn Din betw.en (A~5:** llc-:;sx :::'!,.s.. ~:,:::::~ (G-ial+u su;::r :::a';,ol ~=~~;

=~~~::

5:n;:i::;;:x fN/ln5p f"1insp onof offflp. nlque+lmp all.eted IH-rlllel Surcilarge+ Sun:harge+ no. of smaN -t*----+-t------+-+---+--+---+-++---+--+*-t----t--+~priority) ~*---~~

-+-u"-""'

-+""'"" ~

- '°'-f-- - *~*)-+-f-"'°""

-~')--t-- - *~.)--+-'"- *_R __ *-+--~ FN~ellef) ~+---t--+--t-i--'""' -**_u _.....,_:'.. ~°'-+-----I 4.0 1,200 2,100 6'l<<l 16!!0 231i7 5&1 2.949 16 2.964 12 12 3,000 ,.o 1,200 2.700 13920 4320 2543 747 3.290 17 3.307 26 26 3,300 18.0 2.200 3.900 53640 14040 4355 1oeo S.434 29 S,463 98 98 13.SOO 5,500

~

= 18! ~ ~;: ~:: =~~--1--:~:!=~~-1r--,~-t- -,~-+--+-~ t-~-+-+----t---c-+-~~:=- ,.~--+-++---+~' -~""~e--,-~'=*""~-t--+-1~700!50 -~-1-~"~""~+-6539 ~ -+--+~2595 ~....... ~*=*1~~+--+-~"~~ +--<<~-t--1~*-~3'3-,-~~~'- +-"' ~--+--+--+--+-~-t-+--~' =1.ooo c.c..i~-+--~" ~*'~00~_, 3A. MaRndumg - Broad{Log,lions1-5) 1.0 12.600 16.300 17175 4575 25097 S332 31.429 11615 167 32,761 31 33 32,800 3A1.Manllkh6ing-&oad(SM16-19) 1.0 16.800 24,300 22875 6075 33427 &409 41,1134 1165 223 43.222 42 43 43,200 3A2. Manllaet..-ing

Broad (5l" 20ormo11) 1 1.0 21,000 30,400 28600 7600 41 792 10515 52,311 1165 278 53,754 52 54 53,800

38. Manufactumg - Othu 30 30.0 3,500 9,000 112SOCI 67500 S402 3114 11,516 1165 5e 12,737 345 382 163,600

~ 381.Manuf~-OU-{U:n6-19) 1.0 4,600 11.900 7575 2975 11069 4117 15,187 1165 74 16.425 IS 16 16,400 382. Manufaet!Xlng-Olhw {sln20ormor*J 1.0 S.800 14,900 9525 3725 13919 5155 19,074 1165 93 20.332 19 20 20,300 3C. Radiopharmaceuticals-M1nuf.JProeess 34 34.0 S,100 7,400 223720 50320 961S 2048 11,664 1165 64 12,893 397 438 10 112,100 12,900 3C1. Radiopharf!lllceulicab - ManufJPt-H (SQs 6-19) 2.0 6,700 9,900 17320 3920 12655 2713 15,367 1165 84 16,617 31 33 16,600 3C2Radiopharma<<1uticab-M.rinuf./Pt-ss{sites20ormor*) _--+-!----~. ~ :~ 8.400 12.200 1~ 2~40 15:° 33n 19.217 1165 1~ 20,488 ~ 20 20,;00 ~======:; ~:,~: ~:=~~~~MarMHTou 5 s1 ~100 ~o; = 1:° 11::.C ~~=

~::

-+~:~cc::=-+~S:~+~':c--+--+~--1-t-7""-+-+----t--+--i-~~"':~"':r-- l

30. lrradiators. > 10.0000 1.0 60.300 5.600 441700 19f!OO 92206 3875 98.092 614 96,696 873 677 1

95,850 98,700 ~ OiAribution-Dwic.R........, --+-+~,,~+-~-+-~,,~.o-t--++---+-~,_...~+-+-~,.~ooo~-+~-+-~,.=<IIOOc-t-~26<00 =-+-~1oo; = 7-+--+~,,~,,c-1~,,cc.715~,--+-~*- -~,-1,~1.~... ~,-~,.,~-t-391 10 148,000 11800 ~ Uce~NoReC::-R*vitw +-----++--~--+-f--=,.~t-7""-+--=~-=;o--1-t+--+.:cc::=-f-+--c.'!::=--+-c-+--c:~~-=""=-r-"""' '°,.=., +-~~-=1~,+--+-1=':'=,-+-1=4\\'cc';;,c-,-+----+--'c~°:=---+-~~"'~==--+--'c1~=c.. -f-~1;'cc~~f-+--c---+-+-c,,c-t--+---=,,.~.:=+-'--+---i~-~"ci - J3K_ Gen. Uc,nff - No Device Review 3.0 1,100 2,800 4980 1seo 242S ns 3,201 16 3.217 10 10 4,700 3,200 J ~;;~~~~;!ad(6-20Ws) ~ ~l-~O ~:: 1 93: 3do1;: 1 ~ 50

~~:

~ 1~~~-,-~~':~:~,-.~-:~--t--~~ 2~+-+-~-+-t-~+-t----+~-+-~!ss~'i,

=~

~ 1 3L(b). R&D - Broad(21 or mor, 5ites) 2.0 8,800 16.200 25700 8100 1am 5605 24.383 1165 125 25,673 49 51 2S,700 3M. R&O - Olhtlr &4 &4.0 6,900 8,100 682080 1024!0 11866 16M 13,554 1165 1'9 14,798 11:!19 1243 13 277,650 14,800 3N. S,r.ic41License 57 57.0 7,100 10.600 555750 151050 14247 3668 17.915 1165 95 19.175 1021 1093 15 10 410JXl0 19,200

30. Radiography 73 73.0 3,100 7,400 766500 S-40200 15343 10242 2S,Sll5 102 25.687 1869 11175 29 S

750,650 25,700 301. Radiogfllphy (Ws 6-19') 30 4.100 9.900 42000 29700 2045ll 13702 34,159 138 34.291!1 102 103 34,300 3P1.AIOttw,~MaMrials(sitn 6-19) O 21 21.0 4,500 9,500 134400 39900 9352 2'30 11,982 S2 12,044 2S2 2S3 O O 12,000 3P2.AIOttwrByprodudMll!llrials(W120<<,;;;*rl ----1-+-- 3 3.0 5.600 11,900 23!MO 7140 11661 3294 14.955 78 15.033 45 45 ~

::::::.d)=n~:;--;;:j~0.~J1~~;~; -* T3_1.1~~~--1--!---~--+--+-~-1C-~--t--~~:~~+--+-!---+~: ~:: --f--:~::~-f---c-+~:'

~,~f-:~: ~+-==~--f---+--:0,, ="'~+-:,C::~+--+---t--~~7 -f-,c' ~:~~.. ~f-~- 1---' -+-+-~-+-t-~+-f----+-'-+ -;::: -+"=*~'"='="=~'°~*~*~*"""=="~~=-="'~"~- -t----+-1--~---+-+~1~' -+-~+-~1=1.o~+--++---+~ " ~*..,cc...+---t-~'=*ooo~-,~-+===-'-+~68000 =-+~'~'°~"-+--t-""" =-+="=*"='--+->---lf-~1=" -+-~ " ~:m~+-="" ~-+- "'~-+-+~-1-+-~-1----1---"= *'so"-l-~--1-~' ~' *='oo~_, WASTE DISPOSAL ANO PROCESSING: ---t-++---+--t--+----+--+---+---f---+--+--+---t-+---+----+---+---+ 0.0 11~ 1,165 15.0 6.700 6,600 150000 49500 14613 19.1 IIO 11~ 97 20,442 4C. Wast* Reuipt - Pr,packaQed 1.0 8167 1267 9011 10,764 11~ 60 11 WEU LOGGING: 5A.. W.1Logging 23 23.0 175567 72067 11154 15.491 15.565 J56 SB. Fttold Floocf'"i Tr-111 Stu<hs" 0.0 0 0 11~ 1,165 NUCLEAR LAUNDRY; 6A. t-Alclearl1i.ndfy 0.0 "~ 1.165 HUMAN U5E OF BYPROOUCT, SOURCE, OR SNM; 7A. Tei.lMfapy 9.0 10,800 7,000 114750 17550 186.31 296 21,626 12' 21,750 195 7A1. T... ll'l<<lpyWs6-19 1.0 14.400 14,400 1IIOOO 3600 26303 296 31.581 31,756 32 1.0 17,900 13~ 211SO 3250 30906 296 35,700 206

78. MMka1 - ~d 12 12.0 180000 1'9200 21919 296 9134 11~

1'6 32,660 378 781. Mtdieal-Broaddn S.1 9 7.0 11,200 17,60:l 140000 6160:) 29225 296 12179 11~ 195 '3,060 292 782. Mlodical - Broad IM52001mo,. 1.0 14.000 21,900 24950 10950 36459 296 15155 11~ S3.317 7C. Mtdic.110ther 775 77S.O 8,600 5890000 17050CXl 11106 296 3045 14,446 14,520 11196 CML DEFENSE: 10 10.0 2,500 30000 1$000 = 1799 7,352 37 1 of 2 307 81.SOO 20,400 12 -+--t-~+--+---+-+--~ -1~-+-~ " ~*000 ~ -1 196 32 392 301 11253 90250 17,60:l 2.233,400 3,300 15,600 2 1,700 31,800 35,900 32,700 43,100 53,300 14,500 7,400

12/01/2017 FY 2018 Materials Users Annual Fees I ~NE + I OEVtcE, PRODUCT, OR SEALED SOURct SAFETY EVALUATION: --f---f---f---t-+---+--+- --- -+-_+-~'~; -+-~+ -c~..,:c-t-+t---t--c;,!:: ~ t-+----+-~ t-~ ~ +-,;,~=:.=-+--t---=--+----C:11;cc:,ac-1-+---- +-+--~::~~:~~: ~:~~:'"~;,_-+t-----+\\t-_-_--:__-_--+-+-5",:o,. 1~=00t _t-~_:;~~~~~~~_:;~_t-_::i;:3~:00 ='=00'-+- ~: -~-+-t-~~' -+-+-~ -I-- 191,250 172~:! 11 12

111,200 7,500 "2

12.s- Total $mall Entity $ub1Jid 529 7,079,100 fTERAT_E~' ----------t------+---t---S407,810 770

+----+-t-UNIQUE ACTMTES IOENTIFIED FOR FY 201l 4.8~

$0.001(COHTIUICT COSTS) -+--+----t---+---+---+---t---t-----t----t---+---,- ----+----+----+----+'-t---+--+--H----+-+-- - t----~ I Amoun1 aloul:ed to lll{C-i.riM...,_ 'IJx killll~ai) No. ol afT9d9d lll{C lanHS (lot FY 2018. Cab. 7A. 78, & 7C, + IM&e medical undar ~"~* Uniqu.p<<llctnn: I ~ P11t 171 (annual fn) amount, ucluding f-*nliaf co.ts): s 1,957,486 _ I .. ~ S27'5,390-=+-+---+---+---~ 9310 -+--+----+---+----+------------ S:,3,593,$03 rn:--H.rn=..,. = l--+---+--+t---.ps~,-+---+-+-~,.~..,~+-+---+---+---+---+--+----+-+--- 11..c $407,810 S7.095,887 Sl,200 $7,097,017 -----t----t----t----t-+----t---+--+--t-----t---+-- I ~ pection Amount (budgeted costs for matfflalt lntpeellont ): LLW Surcharge A.moon! fan FEE:BfLIEI= ACIIYIIIES Sbsst torfurthw d11fil1J* $3,358.371!1 P,r<:,ruga lo bt rte0Wf.cl from fflillarilllt licam..H 12.l!l'IJ I--- Amount to bt rKOYtrad lrom m11tarials ~l--=S<'--29"'.an"" ~ No. ot.n.ct.ct kaM.1, 369.0 LLW Surch*va ps liun.. : SD'i5.- Olbst fristtrr AmPWJt fin FEE:flEUEF ACJMDes Sbnt rg, furthw dl\\lilal .=:==.. Perc.nlagt kl bt r.oovw9d from -*nm liunseft 3.4'1J ~i Tolalolher,._._,klbe1-.d $5,154,550 1-- An,oui,tlobe~ftommateriats J S1~ r ~ ~ TOTAL GENERAL
TOTAL Part 171 amount ktt INSPECTION lattUNICUE:
33.59< 7,097 -+-+---+---+-*--- -+--t-i---+---t--1--1----+--+-- -- -+-+----+---+--- -I-- --- --j----t---+-----+--+-- - -+- -+-+----+--*t---+---++---+---+-+----+--+---+---1---+--+---+---+--+---- - SK .........!!:._~++---+---+--+----+--+---*-+----+---+--+---+---+--+------ 275 21,221 T -+----+--+*--*-* 1-- --+--+- >--+---+--+--- AHMJAl FEE MULTIPLIER
TOTAL GENERAL/Total ofCak ol f- --+----+----+----+-+---+-+ ---+--+----+--+-
Gan. Multiple col.: 26,221 / 17,9'4 ~T -+-f-- -+-f---t---t---f-++---+---+--+----+---+---+-- --+---+---+---+---+-+---+- ---f---f---f---t-+---+--+ INSPECTION MUL TIPUER*INSPECTION AMOUNT/Total Cak of tnsp. Multlplacol.: FEE-RELIEF MlA.. TIPLIER* Fae-Retlef amount 10 b, adju1ted for material, 11can1uthotal of Cak of Gan. Multi pl* col.): ~ ~- __[_ COl.(5)
C~
"{COL(2) *COl.(3)JC~ COl..{6)*COL(1) " {COl.. (3)1COL (4)) ca. (8) * (UNCLE COSTS) I (NO. ~ APPUCA8lE LICENSES) COL tl'l
INSPECTION MUI..TlPI.JER"(COl.31COl.4) ca. (10)

COL {7)

COL{l}+r,.... -
COL (11)
UW SURCHARGE..... Alocated

UW Comlf afflldtd licanws COL (12~EE-RELIEF MUI.TIPUER"(COl.(2)*(COl.(3){COL(4))
S7,097,0ll7J S1 74.638 / 5,1211 1.38 -+--+---+--+-- -+-++---+----+--+-----+---+---+ 17,944 --+-+---+---1 f- -- ~-- COl.(~*COl.__110l
COL_:_(~1n~*~COl.
~ (12)=:::====---::j:::===+:J= COL(14)*(COL I "COL (IO)J/1000 COl. (15) * (COl. (1 "COL.:: (13~)1::/!~000~======t====:j:::~-- -+-+--+---+---+-++---+--+--+----+--t----+---+---+--+----+---+--+'----+----+----+----+----+--+--+--+-- 2or2
ANNUAL FEE CALCULATION FOR AGREEMENT STATE USE ONLY FY 2018 Annual Fee Part 170 Fees($) Cale. of Cale. Part 171 Base Fee Per License ($) Total Exact (Rounded) lnsp. General of lnsp. Total Adjustment per License Annual Base Fee per LLW Fee per License Fee Category Appl. lnsp. Prior. Multiple Multiple General Inspection license Surcharge Fee-Relief Total license (Fee-Relief multiplier x (appl Annual fee (Total fee+insp (No. of multiplie.-(Ap Materials fee/insp licenses x (No. of pl fee+ insp Inspection LLW priority)See (Appl fee + licenses x fee/insp multiplier*(ins Surcharge/ below for (Total Base insp insp priority) p fee/insp no. of calculation of Fee+ LLW annual fee priority)insp. fee/insp fee/insp multiplier of multiplier of (General+ affected fee-relief Surcharge+ priority) priority) 1.48 1.68 Inspection) licenses) multi.) Fee-Relief) NUCLEAR LAUNDRY: 6A. Nuclear Laundry 21,500 5,900 3 0 0 34,773 3312 38,085 1274 -507 38852 38,852 38,900
Part 171 Annual Fees Transportation Section 111.8.2.h Table XVII Table XVIII Consistent with the policy established in the NRC's FY 2006 final fee rule, the NRC will recover generic transportation costs unrelated to DOE as part of existing annual fees for license fee classes. NRC will continue to assess a separate annual fee under § 171.16, fee category 18.A., for DOE transportation activities. The resources associated with generic transportation activities are distributed to the license fee classes based on the number of Certificates of Compliance (CoCs) benefiting (used by) that fee class, as a proxy for the generic transportation resources expended for each fee class. The amount of the generic resources allocated is calculated by multiplying the percentage of total CoCs used by each fee class (and DOE) by the total generic transportation resources to be recovered.
PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: NEW REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/ PRODUCTS: Oversight Enforcement Mission IT Total Direct Resources PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: OPERATING REACTORS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Oversight Allegations & Investigations Emergency Preparedness Enforcement Event Evaluation Inspection Mission IT Research & Test Reactor lnsp. Security Total Direct Resources Grand Total Nuclear Reactor Safety PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: FUEL FACILITIES PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Training Mission Training NSPDP Training Total Direct Resources PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFEn IC>IIC,JNCC,C, I INF*.,,,,.., CAD Ul\\TFRIAI ~ USERS PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Oversight Allegations & Investigations Enforcement Event Evaluation Inspection Mission IT Security Rulemaklng Rulemaking State Tribal and Federal Programs Agreement States Liaison Training Mission Training NSPDP Training Total Direct Resources PROGRAM: NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY Mission Direct Budgeted Resources for Transportation Fee Class FY1 8 Contract ($,K) FTE 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.2 2 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.5 24 0.2 0 0.0 25 0.9 BUSINESS LINE: DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW LEVEL WASTE PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: Mission Training Training 0 0.0 Total Direct Resources 0
0.0 PROGRAM
NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY BUSINESS LINE: SPENT FUEL STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCT LINE/PRODUCTS: International International Cooperation 90 0.5 Licensing Emergency Preparedness 0 0.0 Environmental Reviews 0 0.0 Fukushima NTIF 0 0.0 Licensing Support 0 3.0 Mission IT 293 0.4 Securrty 0 0.0 Storage Licensing 0 0.0 Transportation Certification 781 10.7 Oversight Inspection 0 1.5 12/01/2017 FY17 Difference Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 (0) 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.1 2 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.5 0 0.0 33 0.2 (9) 0.0 0 00 0 0.0 34 0.7 (9) 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 90 0.5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 4.0 0 (1.0) 225 0.4 68 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 682 10.7 99 0.0 0 1.5 0 0.0 Page 1 of 2
PROGRAM: NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY Rulemaklng Rulemaking (PL) Security Training Mission Training NSPDP Training Travel Mission Travel Total Direct Resources Grand Total Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety TOTAL TRANSPORTATION Mission Direct Budgeted Resources for Transportation Fee Class FY18 Contract ($,K) FTE 0 1.4 0 0.0 26 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1,190 17.5 1,215 18.4 1,217 18.6 Total value of budgeted resources for fee class(mission direct FTE x full cost of FTE + mission direct contract$) $8,802 12/01/2017 FY17 Difference Contract ($,K) FTE Contract ($,K) FTE 0 2.0 0 (0.6) 0 0.0 0 0.0 80 0.0 (54) 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1,077 19.1 113 (1.6) 1,111 19.8 104 (1.4) 1,11 3 19.9 104 (1.3) $8,964 ($162) Page 2 of 2
TRANSPORTATION ANNUAL FEES FY 2018 The total transportation budgeted costs of $5,891,259 to be recovered from annual fees (not including fee-relief adjustments) is to be obtained from two sources:
1. Department of Energy (DOE)--has own annual fee (fee category 18A)

2. Other licensees (included in their annual fees)
Distribute these costs to DOE and the fee classes based on the percentage of CoCs benefitting (used) per fee class: Transportation Fee Class
CoCs
%CoCs Resources to be Resources in included in annual Millions fees DOE 21.00 23.5% $1,382,057 $1.38 Operating Reactors 5.00 5.6% $329,061 $0.33 Spent fuel/reactor 14.00 15.6% $921,372 $0.92 decom T &R reactors 0.52 0.6% $33,968 $0.03 Fuel Facilities 24.00 26.8% $1,579,494 $1.58 Materials Users 25.00 27.9% $1,645,306 $1.65 Total 89.52 100.0% $5,891,259 $5.89 1
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Section V. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as amended 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., requires that agencies consider the impact of their rulemakings on small entities and, consistent with applicable statutes, consider alternatives to minimize these impacts on the businesses, organizations, and government jurisdictions to which they apply. Additionally, the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) requires all Federal agencies to prepare a written compliance guide for each rule for which the agency is required to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis. Therefore, in compliance with the law, the NRC has made publicly available via ADAMS the "FY 2018 Small Entity Compliance Guide". Licensees may use this guide to determine whether they qualify as a small entity under NRC regulations and are eligible to pay reduced FY 2018 annual fees assessed under 1 O CFR part 171. The N RC has established two tiers of annual fees for those materials licensees who qualify as small entities under the NRC's size standards.
Note: Using the FY 2009 calculation method Implemented to Determine Upper Tier Small Entity Fee Each Biennial Year To Be 39 % Of The Prior Two-year Weighted Average Of Small Materials Users Fees. lD 28 2C 2E 2F 3A 38 3C 3E 3G 3H 31 2015 small entities 6 1 3 0 1 0 10 15 1 0 9 13 2016 small entities 7 1 4 1 2 0 7 13 0 0 10 17 2016 Total# of Licensees 45 13 21 47 57 4 35 35 61 6 30 72 15.56% 7.69% 19.05% 2.13% 3.51% 0.00% 20.00% 37.14% 0.00% 0.00% 33.33% 23.61% 2015 Fee $8,200 $3,500 $6,800 $8,300 $7,800 $30,700 $13,000 $13,500 $9,900 $108,900 $12,400 $18,300 2016 Fee $8,100 $3,600 $6,800 $8,300 $7,700 $30,600 $12,800 $13,500 $10,000 $108,100 $12,300 $18,200 Implementing this method in FY 2017 would have resulted in a 32 percent increase from the previous year which would have a disproportionate impact upon small NRC licensees. Therefore, the NRC revised the increase to 21 percent for the upper-tier fee. The 21 percent increase was applied based on historical trends in the small entity fee and has been used in previous biennial reviews. Top Lower $49,200 $56,700 Prior Year 3,400 700 $3,500 $3,600 21% ceiling 21% 21 % $20,400 $27,200 Increase Rounded Fee $714 $4,100 147 $850 $0 $8,300 $7,800 $15,400 $0 $0 $130,000 $89,600 $202,500 $175,500 $9,900 $0 $0 $0 $111,600 $123,000 $237,900 $309,400 3J 1 1 6 16.67% $4,700 $4,700 $4,700 $4,700 3K 0 0 5 0.00% $3,500 $3,500 $0 $0 3M 14 16 88 18.18% $12,400 $12,400 $173,600 $198,400
3N 18 19 68 27.94% $21,200 $21,200 $381,600 $402,800 30 32 29 80 36.25% $25,800 $26,000 $825,600 $754,000 3P 295 272 1056 25.76% $8,000 $7,900 $2,360,000 $2,148,800 3S 0 2 20 10.00% $31,100 $30,900 $0 $61,800 48 4 5 13 38.46% $22,200 $22,000 $88,800 $110,000 4C 1 0 1 0.00% $14,700 $14,800 $14,700 $0 SA 6 6 27 22.22% $14,400 $14,500 $86,400 $87,000 7A 0 1 11 9.09% $24,700 $24,700 $0 $24,700 7C 219 198 832 23.80% $13,300 $13,300 $2,912,700 $2,633,400 9A 22 19 84 22.62% $7,900 $7,900 $173,800 $150,100 9C 9 7 26 26.92% $7,800 $7,600 $70,200 $53,200 Total 680 637 2743 23.22% $7,864,900 $7,437,600 Weighted Average $11,566 $11,676 $11,566 $11,675.98 2-year Weighted Average $11,621 39% of 2-year weighted average $4,532 $933.10 Rounded $4,500 $900 Prior Year 3400 700 32% 29%
Budget Authority (FY 2018)
The table below delineates where the major portion of a Business Line's direct budgetary resources are allocated when calculating 1 O CFR Part 171 fees for a license fee class. The indirect portion of a Business Line (e.g. Training, Travel, Mission Support and Supervisors), as well as Corporate Support budgetary resources, are distributed among all license fee classes. CROSSWALK OF BUSINESS LINES' ALLOCATION TO FEE CLASSES* Business Line License Fee Class Operating Reactors Power Reactors, Test and Research Reactors, Import/Export New Reactors Power Reactors Fuel Facilities Fuel Facilities Nuclear Materials Users Materials Users, Import/Export Spent Fuel Storage and Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Transportation Decommissioning, Transportation Decommissioning and Low-level Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Waste Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery
Delineates where the major portion of a Business Line's direct budgetary resources are allocated for a ftcense fee class. Does not include fee-relief a/location. NRG does not have licensees under the Rare Earth fee class.
More information about 10 CFR Part 170 and 1 O CFR Part 171 can be found at NRC's public website: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/requlatory/licensinq/fees.html.
Budget Authority (FY 2018) FY 2018 Budget Summary by Program This report is provided as supplemental information. It provides a summary of the FY 2018 budgeted FTE and contract dollars allocated to each fee class and fee-relief/surcharge activities at the Program level. The Programs include: 1) Nuclear Reactor Safety, 2) Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety, 3) Corporate Support, and 4) Inspector General.
FY 2018 MISSION DIRECT BUDGETED RESOURCES I I I I SPENT *uEL :;TuRAGei TEST AND RESEARo.;t1 I POWER REACTORS I REA{ TOR DEt.uMM, REACTORS FUEL rA~ILITY MATERIALS TO,~* I ALLOCATIONS I ALL0o.;ATluNS ~ ** OCATluNS ALLOCATIONS ALLOCATION:. CONTRACT CONTRACT CONTRACT CONTRACT CONTRACT CONTRACT $,K FTE $,K FTE $.K FTE $,K FTE $,K FTE $,K FTE NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY 133,776.0 1969.0 86,885.0 1,480.2 2.0 0.4 305.0 6.6 0.0 0.0 18.0 0.0 N*" '**R MATERIALS & WASTE SAFETY rno HLW/Gen Fundl 31,941.0 534.0 877.7 4.0 4 998.7 72.2 0.6 0.0 1 416.7 82.7 598.0 79.3 cn~~n~*TE 194 451.0 616.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 INSPECTOR GENERAUno DNSFBl 1,810.0 58.0 SUBTOTAL - FEE BASE RESOURCE 361 978.0 3177.0 87 762.7 1 484.2 5 000.7 72.6 305.6 6.6 1 416.7 82.7 616.0 79.3
FY 2018 MISSION DIRECT BUDGETED RESOURCES TRAN SPORT A TION URANIUM RECOVERY RARE EARTH IMPORT/EXPORT INCLUDED IN TOTAL ALLOCATIONS ALLOCATIONS ALLOCATIONS ALLOCATIONS FEE-RELIEF ACTIVITIES CONTRACT CONTRACT CONTRACT CONTRACT CONTRACT CONTRACT $,K FTE $,K FTE $,K FTE $,K FTE $,K FTE $,K FTE NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY 133,776.0 1,969.0 2.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 16,637.0 21.6 NUCLEAR MATERIALS & WASTE SAFETY (no HLW/Gen Fund) 31,941.0 534.0 1,215.0 18.4 2,283.0 27.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 13,831.3 141.9 CORPORATE 194,451.0 616.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 INSPECTOR GENERAL/no DNSFBl 1,810.0 58.0 SUBTOTAL - FEE BASE RESOURCE 361 978.0 3177.0 1 217.0 18.6 2 283.0 27.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 30,468.3 163.5
FY 2018 MISSION DIRECT BUDGETED RESOURCES INCLUDED IN I PROFESSIONAL AGREEMENT AGREEMENT HOURLY & FTE RATE NONPROFIT ED. INTERNATIONAL STATE STATE TOTAL (overhead) EXEMPTION ACTIVITIES OVERSIGHT REG SUPPORT CONTRACT CONTRACT CONTRACT CONTRACT CONTRACT CONTRACT $,K FTE $,K FTE $,K FTE $,K FTE $,K FTE $,K FTE NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY 133,776.0 1,969.0 29,927.0 459.0 864.0 15.0 10.0 1.0 38.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 NUCLEAR MATERIALS & WASTE SAFETY (no HLW/Gen Fundl 31,941.0 534.0 6,720.0 106.0 41.3 4.6 6,434.0 16.7 1,827.0 27.7 2,743.5 35.9 CORPORATE 194,451.0 616.0 194,451.0 616.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 INSPECTOR GENERAL<no DNSFBl 1,810.0 58.0 1,810.0 58.0 SUBTOTAL - FEE BASE RESOURCE 361 978.0 3 177.0 232 908.0 1 239.0 905.3 19.6 6 444.0 17.7 1 865.0 27.9 2 743.5 35.9
FY 2018 MISSION DIRECT BUDGETED RESOURCES ISL RULE/ GENERIC ~ILITARY RADIU~ PUBLIC RADIUM GEN LICENSEES/ DECOMMISS/ 226 226 TOTAL FELLOWSHIPS RECLAIMATION GENERIC LLW BUDGET SUM CONTRACT CONTRACT CONTRACT CONTRACT CONTRACT CONTRACT CONTRACT $,K FTE $,K FTE $,K FTE $,K FTE $,K FTE $,K FTE $,K FTE NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY 133,776.0 1,969.0 15,725.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 133,776.0 1,969.0 NUCLEAR MATERIALS & WASTE SAFETY (no HLW/Gen Fund) 31,941.0 534.0 528.5 2.3 1,958.0 40.3 0.0 2.8 0.0 4.1 299.0 7.5 31,941.0 534.0 CORPORATE 194,451.0 616.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 194,451.0 616.0 INSPECTOR GENERAUno DNSFB) 1,810.0 58.0 1,810.0 58.0 SUBTOTAL-FEE BASE RESOURCE 361,978.0 3 177.0 16,253.5 7.7 1,958.0 40.3 0.0 2.8 0.0 4.1 299.0 7.5 361 978.0 3,177.0
Budget Authority (FY 2018) FY 2018 Budget by Product Line These reports are provided as supplemental information. They provide a summary of the FY 2018 budgeted FTE and contract dollars by Product Line and allocated by: 1) the Nuclear Reactor Safety Program and the Nuclear Materials & Waste Safety Program, 2) Corporate Support, 3) Inspector General, by each office with mission direct budgeted resources.
The offices include:
Office of Inspector General Office of Research Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations Off ice of New Reactors Regional Offices Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response Office of General Counsel Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Office of International Programs Office of Enforcement Office of Investigations Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer Office of Administration
FY 2018 BUDGET RESOURCES FOR OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Budget Resources Allocated to Fee Classes Professional Hourly Rate Professsional Total Contract Hourly Rate Program Business Lines Product Lines Total Contract ($,K) FTE ($,K) FTE ! Inspector General !Inspector General (IG) ! Inspector General (PL) 1,810 58 1,810 58 !Grand Total 1,810 58 1,810 58
FY 2018 BUDGET RESOURCES FOR OFFICE OF RESEARCH +- I
-1 I==i
I OFFICE RES I ~ ---- Budget Resources Allocated to Fee Classes Spent Fuel Total Ster/Reactor Spent Fuel Professional Contract Total Power Reactors Power Reactors Oecomm. Stor/Reactor Fee Relief Fee Relief Hourty Rate Professional Program Business Lines Product Unes ($ Kl FTE Contract 1$ Kl FTE Contract ($,Kl Decomm. FTE Contract 1$ Kl FTE Contract 1$ Kl Hourtv Rate FTE Integrated University Integrated University Cornorate Suooort Program IBLl Proaram /PU 0 0 15000 0 Nuclear Matertals and Waste Safetv Nuclear Matertals Users Research 0 1 0 0.7 Rulemakina /PU 0 0 0 0 Spent Fuel Storage and Transoortatlon Research 730 2 730 2 0 0 Travel /PU 15 0 0 0 15 0 Decommissioning and LLW Research 150 1 150 1 Nuclear Reactor Safetv New Reactors Research 3236 12 3 236 12 0 0 Rulemakina /PU 0 0 0 0 PL-M - Supoort Staff 0 1 0 0 0 1 Ooeratlna Reactors International Activities 0 3 3 0 0 Research 36795 129 36 795 129 0 0 PL-M Sun~rt Staff 186 37 0 0 186 37 Travel CPU 888 0 0 0 888 0 Rulemakina CPU 250 11 250 11 0 0 Grand Total 42250 197 40281 155 730 2 15150 1.7 1089 38
FY 2018 BUDGET RESOURCES FOR OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONS _j___ OFFICE NRR r Budget Resources Allocated to Fee Classes Power Test & Reactors Research Test& Fee Relief Professional Professional Total Contract Total Contract Power Reactors Research Contract Fee Relief Hourly Rate Hourly Rate Proaram Business Lines Product Lines 1$ Kl FTE 1$ Kl Reactors FTE Contract 1$ Kl Reactors FTE 1$Kl FTE Contract 1$,Kl FTE Nuclear Materials and Waste Safety Fuel Facilities LicensinQ 0 0 0.0 0 Nuclear International Materials Activities 0 1 0.0 1 RulemakinQ (Pll 0 0 0.0 0 Spent Fuel Storage and Licensina 0 1 1 0.0 0 Decommissioni LicensinQ 0 1 1 0.0 0 Nuclear Reactor Safety New Reactors Licensing 100 5 100 5 0.0 0 Oversiaht 0 2 2 0.0 0 Travel (Pll 32 0 0.0 0 32 0 Rulemakinp (PL\\ 0 1 1 0.0 0 PL-M - Support Staff 0 1 0.0 0 0 1 Operating International Reactors Activities 0 7 6 0.0 1 Licensinp 11991 291 9 820 269 275 6.1 1178.0 13.9 718 2 OversiQht 61 35 404 6135 400 0.5 0.0 3.5 PL-M Suoport Staff 936 83 0.0 0 936 83 Travel (Pll 2478 0 0.0 0 2478 0 Rulemakino (PL\\ 505 20 100 20 405.0 0 Grand Total 22177 817 16 155 705 275 6.6 1 583.0 19.4 4164 86
1--'-;;- c..c.F.c..F"'"'IC=E==========~---"N"""R-'-O=-----------'-- FY 2018 B~ GET R~OUR~-+=r OF NEW Rr ORS ProQram Business Lines Product Lines Nuclear Materials and International Waste Safetv Nuclear Materials Users Activities International Nuclear Reactor Safety I New Reactors Activities -=t-Licensing Oversight Trainina 'Travel IPL) IRulemaking (PL) PL-M - Support Staff Operating Reactors Licensing Oversight PL-M Support Staff Travel (PL) Rulemakina (PL) Grand Total Budget Resources Allocated to Fee Classes Total Contract ($ Kl 0 60 10228 80 0 1566 0 748 1400 0 0 120 0 14202 Total FTE 1 3 168 90 0 0 5 61 16 2 1 0 1 348 Power Power Reactors Reactors Contract ($ Kl FTE 60 3 10 228 168 80 90 5 1 400 16 2 1 11 768 285 t__ -t-b -i=- --~ ~- I Professional Professional Fee Relief Fee Relief Hourly Rate Hourly Rate Contract($ Kl FTE Contract ($ Kl FTE 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1566 0 0 0 0 0 748 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 1 2434 62
FY 2018 BUDGET RESOURCES FOR REGIONAL OFFICES I I I Budget Resources Allocated to Fee Classes Power Power Professional Professional Reactors Reactors Fuel Facility Materials Hourly Rate Hourly Rate Program Proaram Business Lines Product Lines Total Contract ($,Kl Total FTE Contract ($,Kl FTE FTE FTE Contract ($,Kl FTE REG1 Coroorate Suooort Corporate Sunoort 4497 6 4497 6 Nuclear Materials and Waste Safetv Nuclear Materials Users Licensina 0 0 Oversiaht 0 1 1 Travel (PLl 397 0 397 PL-M - Suooort Staff 0 9 9 Spent Fuel Storaae and Transoortation Travel IPU 50 0 50 0 PL-M - Suoport Staff 0 3 3 Decommissioninp and LL W Travel I PU 84 0 84 PL-M - Suooort Staff 0 0 0 Nuclear Reactor Safetv New Reactors Travel IPL) 4 0 4 0 Qperatina Reactors Event Response 50 0 50 Oversiaht 0 1 1 Trainin9 0 0 PL-M Support Staff 819 40 819 40 Travel (PLl 2256 0 2256 0 REG1 Total 8157 60 50 1 1 8107 58 REG3 Corporate Suooort Corporate Support 4436 4 4436 4 Nuclear Materials and Waste Safetv Nuclear Materials Users LicensinQ 0 1 1 Travel (PL) 332 0 332 PL-M - Support Staff 0 9 9 Scent Fuel Storaae and Transoortation Travel IPL) 24 0 24 0 Oecommissioninp and LL W Travel /PU 89 0 89 PL-M - Suooort Staff 0 2 2 ~ Nuclear Reactor Safety New Reactors Travel (PU 11 0 11 0 Qperatina Reactors Event Response 40 1 40 1 Oversiaht 0 1 1 TraininQ 0 0 PL-M Sunnort Staff 499 39 499 39 Travel IPU 1930 0 1930 0 REG3 Total 7361 57 40 2 1 7321 54 REG4 Coroorate Suooort Coroorate Supoort 4811 6 4811 6 Nuclear Materials and Waste Safetv Fuel Facilities Travel (PU 10 0 10 Nuclear Materials Users LicensinA 0 1 1 Travel (PLl 309 0 309 PL-M - Support Staff 0 6 6 Spent Fuel Storaae and Transportation Travel IPU 32 0 32 0 Decommissionina and LL W Travel IPL) 156 0 156 PL-M - Suooort Staff 0 1 1 Nuclear Reactor Safetv New Reactors Travel IPU 15 0 15 0 Ooeratina Reactors Event Response 1111 0 1111 Licensins; 0 0 Oversiaht 0 1 1 PL-M Support Staff 180 36 180 36 Travel (PL) 2372 0 2372 0 REG4 Total 8996 51 1111 1 1 7885 49 REG2 Cornorate Support Corporate Suppart 4872 4 4872 4 Nuclear Materials and Waste Safetv Fuel Facilities Oversiaht 0 1 1 TravellPLl 543 0 543 PL-M - Suooort Staff 0 7 0 7 Fuel Facilities Total 543 8 1 543 7 Nuclear Materials Users Travel (PU 0 0 0 Spent Fuel Starace and Transportation Travel (PLl 16 0 16 0 Nuclear Reactor Safetv New Reactors Oversiaht 210 1 210 1 Trainin!l 0 0 Travel IPL\\ 686 0 686 0 PL-M - Suopart Staff 0 12 0 12 Ooeratina Reactors Event Resoonse 100 0 100 Oversiaht 0 1 1 PL-M Suooort Staff 505 44 505 44 Travel (PLl 2051 0 2051 0 REG2 Total 8983 70 310 2 1 8673 67 Grand Total 33497 238 1 511 6 1 3 31986 228
L OFFtrr: NM$$ Budget Resources Allocat*d to Fee c1..... Power SJMnl Fuel Fuel Total Reactors
Powe, StorfRHctor Spent Fuel Facility Fuel Teat & Research Materials Uranium FN Professional Profeulonal Contract Total Contract Reactors Oecomm.
StorlRHctor Contract Facility RHctors Contract Materials Transportation Transportation Recovery Uranium FH Relief Relief Hourly Rate Hourly Rate Pronram Busin.. a Linea Product Linea FTO IS Kl FYE c--.. *ct IS Kl 0.comm. FTE ISKl =* Contract IS.Kl FTE Contract IS.Kl FTE Contract IS.Kl Recoverv FTE Contract IS.Kl FTE Contract fS Kl FTF Nuclear Matertals and Waste Safety Fuel Facilities Event Resoonse 0 0 0 0 International Adivities 0 5 0 5 Licensina 840 24 840 24 0 0 OvAnUnht 0 30 30 0 0 Travel(PU 412 0 0 0 412 Rulemakino (PL) 23 4 23 4 0 0 PL-M
Support Staff 350 12 0
0 350 12 Nuclear International Materials Users Activities 0 1 0.1 0 0.9 Licensina 967 34 99.7 18.3 887 15.7 Oversiaht 1389 38 6 8 8 0.8 188.7 28.8 1183 9.2 State, Tribal and Federal Pams 312 30 1 0.5 0.1 0.5 1 312 26.9 Travel CPU 1324 0 1159 0 165 I-Rulemakina (PLl 0 8 4.3 0 3.7 PL-M
Support
~ Staff 497 13 0 0 497 13 Spent Fuel Storage and International Transportation Activities 180 3 00 0.5 00 0.5 0 2 Ucensina 4749 50 3 651 35.8 1074 14.1 24 0.3 I - Oversiaht 0 10 6.5 1.5 0 0 ~ Travel lPLl 373 0 0 0 373 0 I-PL-M
Support
~ Staff 14 12 0 0 14 12 Rulemakina 800 5 720 0.8 80 2.8 1.4 0 0 I - Oecommissionln International g and LLW Activities 75 3 75 3 I-Licensinn 4004 53 2 196.0 17.8 1 808 35.2 OvMf"SM"lht 111 23 8.3 4.7 111 12 I - Travel CPLl 429 0 0 0 429 ~ - - Rulomakina IPLl 428 4 428 4 PL-M
Support Staff 12 11 0
0 12 11 Nuclear Reactor Safatv New Reactors Licensina 0 0 0 0 ~ Rulemakino (PL) 0 0 0 0 Operating I-Reactors Licensina 0 2 0 2 Ov_..,,"'ht 0 8 8 0 0 PL-M Support Staff 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rulemakina lPLl 0 6 8 0 0 Grand Total 17269 387 726 15.8 3 827 53.7 869 58.5 0.6 288.4 49.6 1164 18 2 198.0 23.5 5 947 119.9 2252 48
FY 2018 BUDGET RESOURCES FOR OFFICE OF NUCLEAR SECURITY AND INCIDENT RESPONSE L_ OFFICE INSIR I r-- Budget Resources Allocated to Fee Classes Power Power Spent Fuel Fuel Fee Profession Total Contract Reactors Reactors Stor/Reactor Fuel Facility Facility Materials Relief Professional Hourly al Hourly Pro!lram Business Lines Product Lines {$,Kl Total FTE Contract {$,Kl FTE Decomm. FTE Contract {$,Kl FTE FTE FTE Rate Contract {$,Kl Rate FTE Information Coroorate Suooort Corporate Supoort Technoloav 0 0 0 0 0 Nuclear Materials and Event Waste Safety Fuel Facilities Resoonse 30 2 30 2 0 International Activities 0 1 1 0 Licensino 0 3 3 0 Oversiaht 312 7 312 7 0 Travel (PL) 126 0 0 126 Rulemaking i(PL) 0 2 2 0 PL-M - Support Staff 0 2 0 0 2 Nuclear Materials Event Users Resoonse 0 4 0.6 3.4 International Activities 0 1 1 Licensino 0 1 1 0 Travel (Pll 30 0 0 30 Rulemaking I/PL) 0 1 0.1 0.9 Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Licensing 0 4 4 0 Oversight 0 3 3 0 PL-M - Support Staff 0 1 0 1 Rulemakinp 0 1 1 0 Decommissioning and LLW Travel (PL) 0 0 0 0 Nuclear Reactor Safety New Reactors Licensing 175 6 175 6 0 Oversiaht 600 5 600 5 0 Travel (PL) 40 0 0 40 0 Rulemaking (PL) 100 1 100 1 0 PL-M - Support Staff 0 2 0 0 2 Event Ooerating Reactors Resoonse 5944 44 5,944 44 0 International Activities 0 1 1 0 Licensing 750 24 750 23 1 Oversight 3659 72 3 659 72 0 PL-M Support Staff 240 32 0 240 32 Travel (Pll 1073 0 0 1073 0 Rulemaking ICPLl 325 6 325 6 0 Grand Total 13404 226 11 553 158 8 342 15 1.7 6.3 1509 37
FY 2018 BUDGET RESOURCES FOR OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL I I OFFICE IOGC ~ Budget Resources Allocated to Fee Classes Total Power Spent Fuel Fuel Uranium Fee Relief Fee Professional Professional Contract Total Reactors Stor/Reactor Facility Material Recovery Contract Relief Hourly Rate Hourly Rate Pro!lram Business Lines Product Lines {$,Kl FTE FTE Decomm. FTE FTE s FTE FTE {$,Kl FTE Contract {$,Kl FTE Corporate Suooort Coroorate Support Policv Suooort 774 15 0 0 774 15 Corporate Supoort Total 774 15 0 0 774 15 Corporate Suooort Total -f-- 774 15 0 0 774 15 Rulemakin~ IPLl 0 1 1 0 0 Nuclear Materials International Users Activities 0 1 0 0 0 1 Licensina 0 5 3.9 0 0.1 1 State, Tribal and Federal Porns 0 1 0 1 Travel IPL) 14 0 0 0 14 Rulemakina {PL) 0 1 0.1 0 0.9 PL-M
Support Staff 0
1 0 0 1 Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Licensina 0 5 4 0 0 1 Rulemakinn 0 1 1 0 0 Decommissioning and LLW Licensina 0 6 1 0 4 0 1 Travel IPL\\ 11 0 0 0 11 Rulemakinn IPL) 0 1 0 1 PL-M
Support Staff 0
1 0 0 1 Nuclear Reactor Safetv New Reactors Licensina 0 11 9 0 0 2 Oversiaht 0 1 1 0 0 Travel IPL) 35 0 0 0 35 0 RulemakinQ IPL\\ 0 1 1 0 0 PL*M
Support Staff 0
8 0 0 0 8 Operating Reactors Licensina 0 19 16 0 0 3 Oversiaht 0 2 2 0 0 Trainina 53 0 0 0 PL*M Support Staff 76 11 0 0 76 11 Travel IPL\\ 20 0 0 0 20 0 Rulemakinn IPL\\ 0 4 4 0 0 Grand Total 989 99 33 5 3 4 1 0 7 936 46
FY 2018 BUDGET RESOURCES FOR ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS ~-f L-=-- T ---t- ---i-I +- OFFICE ACRS I ~ Budget Resources Allocated to Fee Classes Power Professional Reactors Power Fuel Fee Relief Fee Hourly Rate Professional Total Contract Contract Reactors Facility Contract Relief Contract Hourly Rate Program Business Lines Product Lines ($,K) Total FTE ($,K) FTE FTE ($,K) FTE ($,K) FTE Nuclear Materials and I Waste Safety Fuel Facilities Licensing 0 1 1 0 0 I Decommissioni ng and LLW Licensing 0 1 0 0 Travel (PL) 6 0 0 0 6 ___!'!uclear Reactor Safety New Reactors Licensing 50 5 50 5 0 0 Travel (PL) 90 0 0 0 90 0 I PL-M - Support Staff 0 2 0 0 0 2 ~ - Operating Reactors Licensing 134 16 134 16 0 0 1--- PL-M Support Staff 0 3 0 0 0 3 Travel (PL) 375 0 0 0 375 0 Grand Total 655 28 184 21 1 0 0 471 5
FY 2018 BUDGET RESOURCES FOR OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS I L__ OFFICE IOIP I r-Budget Resources Allocated to Fee Classes Power Spent Fuel Fee Total Reactors Stor/Reactor Decomm. Materials lmport/Expor Fee Relief Relief Professional Hourly Professional Proaram Business Lines Product Lines Total Contract/$ Kl FTE FTE FTE FTE tFTE Contract{$ Kl FTE Rate Contract 1$ Kl Hourlv Rate FTE Coroorate Suooort Coroorate Support Policv Suooort 310 3 0 0 310 3 Nuclear Materials and International Waste Safety Fuel Facilities Activities 0 1 0 0 1 International Nuclear Materials Users Activities 6009 11 3.5 2 6009 4.5 1 Travel {PU 350 0 350 0 PL-M - Support Staff 0 4 0 0 4 Spent Fuel Storage and International Transportation Activities 0 1 0.5 0 0.5 International Decommissioning and LLW Activities 0 1 0.5 0 0.5 PL-M - Support Staff 0 0 0 0 0 International Nuclear Reactor Safetv New Reactors Activities 0 3 2 0 0 1 International Ooerating Reactors Activities 60 7 6 1 0 0 PL-M Support Staff 0 6 0 0 0 6 Travel tPLl 288 0 0 0 288 0 Grand Total 7017 37 8 1 3.5 3 6 359 5.5 598 16
.,o,,.F"Fle,C:.E _____ ---joE Proaram BusinHs Lines Product LinH Human Resource CorDOrate Sucport Coroorate Sucoort Mgml Information Tec~oav Nuclear Materials and Waste Safety Fuel FacilitlH Overslaht Travel (PL) PL-M - Su--t Staff Nuclear Materials UHrs Oversiaht Travel(PU PL-M - Su--t Staff NuclHr Reactor Safety New Reactors Oversiaht Traveil (Pl) PL-M
Su,.,,.,..,.. Staff Operating Reactors Overaiaht PL-M Support Staff Travel PL Grand Total Budget Resources Allocated to Fee
" CIUHS Total Contract IS.Kl 10 0 47 35 0 204 0 42 355 Total Power Reactors FTE Contract I$ K) 10 0 6.0 0 19 1Q8.0 5 0 43 204.0 FY 2018 BUDGET RESOURCES FOR OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT Pow.r Reactors FTE 3.9 18.5 22.4 Spent Fuel Stor/Reactor Spent Fuel Oecomm. StorfReactor Contract($ Kl Oecomm. FTE 2.0 0.5 0.1 2.0 0.3 4.0 0.0 Fuel Faclllty Contract IS Kl 10.0 10,0 Fuel Facility FTE Materials Contract IS Kl 41 Materials Transportation Tranaportatlo FTE Contract 1$ K\\ n FTE 0.2 0.2 0.4 Fee Relief Contract IS Kl 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Fee Relief FTE 0.3 0.3 Profess Iona I Hourly Rate Contract 1$ K\\ 35 42 88 Professional Hourly Rate FTE
FY 2018 BUDGET RESOURCES FOR OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS OFFICE 01 r-Budget Resources Allocated to Fee Classes Power Fee Total Power Reactors Reactors Materials Relief Professional Hourly Professional Program Business Lines Product Lines Total Contract ($,Kl FTE Contract 1$,Kl FTE FTE FTE Rate Contract ($,Kl Hourly Rate FTE Nuclear Materials and Waste Safety Nuclear Materials us, Oversight 0 6 5.6 0.4 Travel IPL) 131 0 0 131 PL-M - Suooort St 0 1 0 1 Nuclear Reactor Safetv New Reactors Oversight 0 1 1 0 Travel /Pll 41 0 0 41 0 Ooerating Reactors Oversiaht 93 23 93 23 0 Trainina 31 0 31 0 PL-M Support Staff 0 12 0 0 12 Travel (PL) 401 0 0 401 0 Grand Total 697 43 124 24 5.6 0.4 573 13
FY 2018 BUDGET RESOURCES FOR ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD OFFICE ASLBP Budget Resourcea Allocated to Fee Classes Power Spent Fuel Reactors Power Star/Reactor Spent Fuel Fuel Uranium Uranium Fee Relief Fee Professional Professional Total Contract Total Contract Reactors Decomm. Contract Star/Reactor Fuel Facility Facility Materials Materials Recovery Recovery Contract Relief Hourly Rate Hourly Rate Proaram Business Lines Product Linea ($ Kl FTE 1$ Kl FTE 1$ Kl Decomm. FTE Contrac1 1$,Kl FTE Contract 1$ Kl FTE Contrac11$ Kl FTE 1$ Kl FTE Contrac11$ Kl FTE Administrative Corporate Support Corporate Support Services 890 1 0.0 0 890 1 Nuclear Materials and Waste Safety Fuel Facilities 5 1 5 1 0.0 0 Nuclear Materials Users licensing 23 2 21.5 1.9 1.5 0.1 Travel PL 27 0 0.0 0 27 Spent Fuel Storage and Transoortatlon Licensing 155 1 155 1 0.0 0 Travel (PL\\ g 0 0.0 0 g 0 Decommissioning and LLW licensing 60 3 60 3 0.0 0 Travel fPLl 22 0 0.0 0 22 Nuclear Reactor Safetv New Reactors Licensina 260 6 260 8 0.0 0 Trainina 10 0 10 0.0 0 0 0 Travel lPLl 38 0 0.0 0 38 0 PL-M - Support Staff 0 2 0.0 0 0 2 Operating Reactors Licensina 85 10 85 10 0.0 0 Trainina 20 0 20 0.0 0 PL-M SuP<lOrt Staff 0 4 0.0 0 0 4 Travel (PL) 21 0 0.0 0 21 0 Grand Total 1645 30 395 16 155 1 5 1 21.5 1.9 60 3 1.5 0.1 1007 7
FY 2018 BUDGET RESOURCES FOR OFFICE OF THE CHIEF HUMAN CAPITAL OFFICER OFFICE OCHCO Resources Allocated to Classes Spent Fuel Professional Total Power Power Stor/Reactor Fuel Test & Research Materlals Uranium Hourly Rate Professional Contract Reactors Reactors
Decomm, Fuel Facility Facllity Reactors Contract Materials Transportation Transportation Recovery Fee Rellef Relief Contract Hourly Rate Proaram Business Lines Product Lines rs Kl Total FTE Contract l$,Kl FTE Contract l$ Kl Contract l$ Kl FTE Contract l$ K}
rs Kl FTE Contract l$ K} FTE Contract l$ Kl Contract l$ K} FTE !$,Kl FTE Human Resource Coroorate Suooort Coroorate Suooort Mamt. 421 7 43 0.0 0 4217 43 Outreach 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 Traininn 2056 14 0.0 0 2056 14 Nuclear Materials and Waste Safetv Fuel Facilities TreinirlQ 304 0 125 19.0 160.0 0 Nuclear Materials Users International Activities 0 0 0.0 0 Treinina 1315 4 145 0.2 30 53 0.2 208.0 0.7 24 0.2 855.0 1.7 1 Spent Fuel Storage and TransPOrtatlon Treinina 41 0 15 26 0.0 0 Decomm issioning and LLW Treinina 663 0 7 240 13 20.0 27 356.0 0 Nuclear Reactor Safetv New Reactors Trainina 1051 10 1 041 10 10.0 0 0 0 Travel PL 50 0 0.0 0 50 0 PL-M - Suooort Staff 0 1 0.0 0 0 1 Ooeratlna Reactors Trainina 3646 26 3 568 24.8 28 6.0 44.0 0.2 1 PL-M Suooort Staff 0 3 0.0 0 0 3 Travel lPU 130 0 0.0 0 130 0 Grand Total 13473 101 4 761 35 285 191 0.2 28 253.0 0.7 50 0.2 27 1 425.0 1.9 6453 83
FY 2018 BUDGET RESOURCES FOR OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION OFFICE ADM Budget Resources Allocated to Fee Classes Professional Hourly Rate Contract professional Hourly Program Business Lines Product Lines Total Contract 1$ Kl Total FTE 1$ Kl Rate FTE Corporate Suooort Corporate Support Administrative Services 67404 73 67404 73 Human Resource Mamt. 150 0 150 0 Information Technoloav 0 0 0 0 Acauisitions 6373 56 6373 56 Nuclear Reactor Safetv Ooerating Reactors Oversight 143 0 143 Grand Total 74070 129 74070 129
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA-90) Referenced throughout the Proposed rule This document is provided as supplemental information. The proposed amendments to 10 CFR Parts 170 and 171 are necessary to implement the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA-90), as amended. The OBRA-90, as amended, requires that the NRG recover approximately 90 percent of its budget authority in fiscal year 2018, less the amounts appropriated for Waste Incidental to Reprocessing, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Nuclear Waste Fund, and amounts appropriated for generic homeland security activities.
Court Decision, 1993 Allied Signal, Inc. v. NRG and Combustion Engineering v. NRG This document is provided as supplemental information. In 1990 Congress required the NRC to collect annual charges and user fees approximating 100 percent of the agency's budget, effective for fiscal year 1991. NRC's FY 1991 fee rule imposed annual charges against virtually all of the agency's licensees in an effort to be more fair and equitable. Previously, it had levied annual charges only on operating nuclear power reactors, which constitute the most significant group of NRC licensees. On July 10, 1991 (56 FR 31472), the NRC published a final rule in the Federal Register that established the Part 170 professional hourly rate and the materials licensing and inspection fees, as well as the Part 171 annual fees, to be assessed to recover approximately 100 percent of the FY 1991 budget. In addition to establishing the FY 1991 fees, the final rule established the underlying basis and methodology for determining both the Part 170 hourly rate and fees and the Part 171 annual fees. The FY 1991 rule was challenged in Federal court by Allied Signal, Inc. v. NRG and Combustion Engineering v. NRG. The court remanded two issues to the NRC for further consideration. Despite the remand, the court did not vacate the rule. One of the remanded issues related to the exemption from annual fees for nonprofit educational institutions. The second remand issue dealt with LLW disposal costs.
/,** / ) \\ - ~1 2 Gf 13 DOCUMENTS
.Allied~ ine., ~v.
U,.S. Nndear ~cy-Cn,;n:missfan mm the United Stlms of:tllDl:riar, Respondents Comtrasiion F.nginemng, Jnr.:. Petimmer v. U.8.-Nnclea:rR~wy Ommossionandifie~ Slims of~ ,Re.spondems Oimhustion Engineering.Im;~v. U.S.NudEDr ~m.,lm,r., Com:mfsciari mu1 the UniledSmis of.America,.~ lac., . Pe!ifianerT. U.. S. Nuc:lem' :Re:,ilat,n:y Commission, ibspmifent . No. 9.1-]467,.No.91~1435, ~ 92,.llJOl, No. 92-1019 UNlTlID STATES COURT OF.Al'.PEAlSFOR THED~Cl" Q:FCOLDMB!A. . cm.corr,.
SiJO U.S.App...D.C Dl8f !J88 P.2ilI.46; 1H3 U..S..App.. LEK1S 4684

r

I LI I
Nm=uiherSJ ~Argued ., '" I. l Mardi 14 :im. Decided JI I. PJOOR msro~: r-i1 ~II$ mr Review ar ~ ~its tegDbitJry -~~~* ami 1o ancxJl Jll ~ ,1111111 1 I, Ir, I:; Ckdr:rcsfdicU.S.Nu=:ar~01111n1issina. 9fmlymd~amangthose.i=ipiem:s.Pwiit1nm Allied S-1pl and 01111hisfi111n E:ngme:sing c:!wJage a coliNskr.: Jaim. ~ wilh. ~ Leomrd A- :Miik:r was OD dJC lri:f. forp:!titioner Ailicd Sigaal. he-in Nos. 1407 aIJd 92-1019 *. 'B'axoid F. '.R.ci!:. witl}. ~ Mir::hel F. Bcaly 'wa$ on the . NRC rule 11WIDg-tlua allo::mon; lb:;y also attad; th: NR.Cs. ddml of vatioos ~ c:xaaptiollS ftom. the fees. They atJq,: 4Jat tbeO BIIIIHSS'iml"s [--.z.t actions did not satisfy' Congrs"s ""f.m[] and~~- 5'aDdm1l and
a1so VCJe amilrmy ml ca¢.clous, We air!= jn part and temaDd the cm m 1bcCos:mnissirm; brief. farperirion=-c.ombusmm 'Engineering. me. in Nos.
. 9~-1435 and 9.2-iOOl.. timkz-auda:niq gmni:d in lhc ~ Officc:s-AppaUPJiatio&t.Ad. af 1.9.$2 f'IOAA "). :11 U.S.C. § 9701; I-Michael Rmky. wma. whc:m Willia!Jl c. Pmfa', Ge:am!J the 01111111issioo bas Jong-cbalFd:iees to any pcnoo who CoaaseJ. 1olm F. ~ St., ~. am1 E. L::o ~ a *~ or*,:&mg
af. value~ from me Sbggie., Depmy

Solicitor. U.S.. Noclesr 'Regl]Jmmy Oot11111i:;~
(Drat e:zm. . fm:lncles,. p:dmps . O Mhlissian. and 'Kath:rinc Adams. Artr,mJ::J.
QXJJDOl'DIDcally.. '"n:glltmJry servio:s" such as peanit Depanm=tafIDSliee,,w=e~thc~*nspcm,Jem; pru:essingJ lD I9&S, ~
Qf3ii!bi me NRC's Tl!:S:tl'fl'tlY ~ iii fhe Comolidmed Omnihas :Budm JDDGFS:
Be:fon:: SiJbernran. Williams md D.R.
.Recl)Jrrusz:irrn Ai:t of i98S c-c<:mRA j. Pub. 1.. Na. Ginsbw_t. Circuit Iudp. Opjnion fi:ir the: Comt filed l,j' ~ 100 Slat. 147. and amlcarfu.d it ID n:cuver.3N Orc:uitJudge Williams.. . of ~ 1D'2l ammsI builge:i: 1hrough fees. Bec:ame IOAA fees CblikI mt generate that-sam. ~ 3Iiowed 1fJe NRC m ~fees Dllt only fir tbesa vi:o-specifJC ams . C0'9CJm by JOAA. lmt a1so for tlJe OmJs:rns:sir;m's gawic OPJNJON BY: WlLI.IAMS OPlNION: . * ~ . of opcszioe {e.g.. casrs asspc :iaa-,t wilb ruJcmating '\\ '. pl~ Q' ~ Icscmdi). J.mr acts msed 1m )) C'°'l.4SJ Williams. CD'l:IIU' ~e: ~ has aireded the Nuclear Fegu)atOIJ' Commission to reeover 100$ of m CJOSts f'nlm those who . ~ reertVC1'j level to 451:1, for 1be :years-1988 lbroqb 1990. n1 Ia cmymg om t:&c WI, and 45'1, ~ mandml:s. rh: C"41@i,sion imposed fees fin,- ~ ~ COS1S only an lia::nsccs who ~ 11l1CI=-
(. ) ).* ).) 300 u.s_App. n.c,. !9&; 9.&& r..2d 146. *148;.
.. 1993 U.S.. App:.l.EXIS*46B4. ~
nl Se: 01lllli1saB,ulg_er~:&:ref 1!187, Pub. L No. 100-2Q3., 101 Slat. J.330..275; . Olll11il>>rs Recilrr>'"iiminn Aa af.1989~ 1'Db. L No. * ~01-239. 1.03 Srat.2I32.. the fee to thr:ir prices will drive cristr;ners to ~ a:itM:nerS. darn=c:. OP cmnrcrtcJS cmmot pqss tbe c:;a;tS ~ Allied draws a sharp CODtcist bcov=I TlF ~ ml other" NRC lk::nscei' suth as ek:aric ~ 'Wbic:b it SZJS are i:eaaiJy.able 1D pass 1bc COSIS Oil to-orsunoers Tlie Ow1111issii\\O dispmes none of Iii= asses1imJs.,
~s szatDlm)' fbt:ary RS_tS bolh. OD lbe 1900 0BRA and an the lr:gi:ilmft: Jiisrl:Jxy" af. I9Slli.
COBRA~ 1att=- Lemg. ~ linked ~ -the l9IJO . OBRA via m ~ msrmy. 8:dioll 620l(c)(3) of . In the 1990 Ornmom Beccmc:,TYfflinn Act ("1990., t1ie 1990 ' (codified at 42 u.s.c. § 2214(c)('3)1* OBRA"). Pn'h. I,.. No. 1~1:..sos. 104 Stat. '13.88-.299. -~~ 1'bm Con.p:$S r.mz:d ~ rccovesy m;mdate for 19!)1-95. tn 100':I, << the C,..@niss.fo1ls ~ s= Pub. I-Na. die Co111111issirrn sflaD csta'bJish, by rule. a 101-.SOS. § 61.Gl (codified *ai.Q if.S,C!_ § 2214J. mid told scl=dDJc of. dm:gcs.faid1 and eq.uitaf,ly. die 0:1t1011issiun"tn JllODlD]pe ~ TIiie appultioniug die _ ~ -itie~amoumarchmgc.s g::m:ric: fees "fairly mil~ among li*tD9:M' Ii!. at [uec:e.s;uy ID recoup 1~ of 1hc § f>lOl(c)Q} (codified at 41. U..S.C. f.2214(c)(.3)). The Carnmiss:ian"s bl:dg,et].* Ieg;darion fm1h::r said* that "'m I.be iiiaciomrn e:mnt pair:ricable, the charges {it$$ sse4 l7y ~ mlc] mall~ a xr:asonabk I.-41 _tdsitionsbip 10* tfJc cost of providing
~
smi=:s ml,ma;ybe based au 1he ~ of the n 1111mission'.ncsou~ among Jicenseec; or c:Jasscs of liCti 1SCPS
Ill. Afkt notice :and comrocm.
dze Cooun iss ii III issued. a nlle pmper1i:ng to arrrf.out ~ dueaions. In c1mng so. it imposed *~ on -.muaJly an Iic%mees See :Revision. of Fee ScbcdoJe:s;_ 100$ Fee. ~ (the 9.EmaI ~'j. 56 Fed. Rq. 31.472 (July 10.1991) (codified.at 10 ~ §§ S2, 71.110. me! 171). [*!~ I .Almd, ill m'2lliDm hcxafiowi.dc (OF) ~ first amqiltmlS alxlui: lhe Omrntissim's fmJarc to oo..sMei die inability of tIF ~ 11)"pass tmoagb~ OBRA fJ:cs . to~ 10 ~ t1ie:m m wbob.. Dl'Dl pmt.by
~
Allied asscris mat dJC Commission~ nmng. i-~ ~ t1C21P1)::Df pf die issoe was iuwusi,r.ea VlidL OBRA - also wiih. the. NRc;:'s D~ of olhet' ~ ~ c:apal,i&r:,y. Allied'S claim tcSI$ DD *simple ms. Jt explains that domei:tic UF c.onvcrt=s annpere with fim:iga. 'OF ci:Jitvcrte:JS wJJO me not subj=t to NRC JiceosiJlg pad dJ!Is ~ not requiled m pq NRC fc=s. tompesmao. it*says. is stiff; ~iii hiddmg aa*m: a:mvc:rswn crmuaas often . tmm on F*5l diffaem1ars m; smaB as. one cent per pound. Fees iDlP.(lSCd under the Etial R.me. ~. add. ~ to almost j;i:ve i:euts per~ ofUF. BeQDSe adding (Emphasis added.) '1bc Cosf.e.enr;ie 1lepott ro the 19!.XJ OBR:A ~ that.th.-. 0111oois*inl hz "the disacdali-
ID 11SS1e:11S ammal c:hargcs apmst all afits bi :e,,cres.

R.i..
. Cont: Rep. Nl.. 964, J01st Cong.. l."'6] 2d SesL (l9'JO). at 961.. At tlJ!: same:-mne. lmwe:.er. tJ,e Rqx:nt ~.,
..::affians m: si:ate:J:rJmt. of tbc [floor] tn;nagr;IS [of 1986.
COBRAlon Jbe present mitbarig"" af'tbe NRC ID assz:ss fees. LL 'Ifiai surernc:nt in t:m:it decmz:d timt it,w ~ ti* I. -msenticm aI b ~as lhat. becamb:1*1~ ' I' i f i !1 I O@mission bsces, sm::ll IS uuiveamcs. bospmlJs. esearch and memcplmsrinnicms. aml urmimn ~ imvc UDrired tibilir]' fl? r= ~ = cum '!l _~ clzargl!S. m rjie ubimate cnz,snmer, the O llillliiSMll sboaid rate mu faaar into ~ m t:e1em;,oq wpeiba to-mafiiJ JjJs) c:::mre:nt fee $Chednle for such Jiccasees;.
m COD!- Rec.. mm/3 (Man::h 6. 1986}
{empbasr:s 1Kldcd). *. .The statlJJmY langnage and~ msm,ydo.na. in oar 'View. add up u, an memnbl! urarn1ase ID prtm:t cb!:ss:s of w,~s "'l8i1h ~ abi&ty ID pass fm forward. E~ 1bc l!lS6 ~msmzy.* wrim= in tJe ~ af COBR.A's ~ 33-$ rmm:iJ ~ ~
dilci:ted. the Cteoioission u, '"tale -
~ af~ ~ which wmildlllll necessariry entslU.that tlios:e ~ CDD2RJI. Moreover. the 1990 Qnifi:n:::nc= Report cxplicidy sail lb.it Caµgn:s5 prc.scrved EW'/1 NRC's discre1ion ID fees on
one or ~ ctasscs af
-~
/ \\ j - 300 U.S. App. D.C: I9l 98S F.2,d 146. '*149; 1993 U.S. Ali?-1.EXIS 4684. --7 Page3 non-power--tmor iiceusc:s if die O mm,eio.n h:::Ireves specific classes of m:mse:e; there :ippem :no reason why it cm tamy. ~ mi plidk:ably do so."H.R,. Caut *
the Omunissian sbCmld not do so. In fact. lhe.
Rep. No. 964. I 01st Cong.. 2d Sess. (1990). at 961.Evcs
Omlmissitin lzd:s mud: sm;h. a. dereu11i1wian for antitbcr

if we~ to give die legislatjve bistxJzy ~
-weight. w: n $ of licPD:SCeS. evc:n dloagh that ~ claim. scrms ccnkhlbt cmdude that Congress bas "direcrly ~- tO ri'.I b::ttcl" fomided tban th: c:ISim of *!he dmnr.stic: UF ~dieCmrnffe;sian mast spare~ that.cnmot cnnw:rtcrs: pass.lfle-=s furwmi Sec Qievrotz It, NtJZJmI!, ~ Defa11se Coimci1. 467 U~ 837. "4 81 L EJ. 2d 694.
~
S. Ct.11J8 (1984). 'The qbeS1im ~ is vibdf~
the Commissian's mtelflidaticn is rcasom,bJe. Sec* id: ar 845; Oremicnl ~
A.s:nJ ir. *gA.* '187 U.S. App.. D.C ~ 919 F.J.d 158, i62-tB f?-C. Cir.1990}..
Specifically. In tbc: Final 1mlc the O@inis$u.
e:xewpted *nanprofit edlu::anonaf* jnqjmrm from. paymcutaf ccrmm 1990 CSR.A fees. See S6 Fed.Reg. at 3L48111.-'2. ~491/1-2; ltJ CFR § m.ll(aJ.. 'This ** ~ to be based st Je:ast. in part cm the mrlcmale tlm . sm::h 'in:viDJJinns -boc, a 1imii=I ability fO pm th:[} msts The Commis:smJJ of:iml two jastif:Jatims fir iis. OD ID cihc:ll..* Fim.1 Rde,, S6 Fm. ~~ tit 31,47J/1-2 4ecisiou rn disregard~ passdutmgh amcmDS at OF
Cl991).n25e.eaiso56 Fea..kg.ar31,.ma~_of c:onvcru:::rs. Ei:sr..it atped that-it couJ<l eat~ :fi:c:s ohiAIDOJilllimtillllims'~abilir;y1Dpmn:gulafmy has::d on h@j?Ciiti111:: imp::t bccmse the JOO"J, xa:ovcy CDSIS through 'ID their clie:msj *
. mandab: of 1990 OBRA * {"'lSOJ *woq]d rcqmre Sill'*. abm:c:menr or fc:s mr am: class or Jic;em:r:es i:o t,c n:coupcd -from ~ See Eosl Rule. 56 Feil. Reg. at . 31.476: Letter ofNRC De:nyiug.Allied &t:mpioD r-sJ. Requ.cst at 3-4. 'H.awever,, vbile i;me coold ague that jt is. onfajrm cbarJ:= any ~mom man its pro J211asbare
of~
costs {~ DCt 11:Dfim-m excuse.some~.
from paying all of-iheirpm Iaa sham wbc:n less &m JOO percent JI!flSt be ~
1bat ~ ~ does 1XJt carry the day hme. The 0..iiiilibSiOO's \\\\?11ingness 10 ~ 211
e:i e111p6.m :fir omrprofit cducmanal im.aiw*irms bt:li::sdi;e RS$Cltion.Jbatit will not

dl2rE= my n:gulaJz:c JDQR: 1baD irs pro.fll?a share.
n2 'Ib:ispzssagc -~ 1D di!:~ ii=s. bat 'DO ilidcpendem jnsrific:atjoa far !he e=mptiou fiam ~ costs app=s. imd * = C**111ois-ion lu:re seems 1D
assume mat die cxplamtibn cm:nds to the gmjc. See.
~Bric::f~ 8,, 19-20. [-10] The Ou11t11issi1111 ~ e:xpiams how it was aJJ1e. tD mal:e mis fiDdmg for DODiJIOfus bm* js 1IOt able to resolve die dasr:kity claim one way or lbe other fer N~ the C111@issiou also poinred 1D an domestic UP cx:nm:lfJ:l:S-Th= Ommiissicm doc& not so ~~811':~~tgofassqs*_ ** gtfle ~ ~ ~~ ~a::laling m.She ~ m wmdi .... ~ of lIS 9000 Tu::ensees 10 P2$ ~ a,sts. See . edue;atioml m:Unthnm: serw- _tbe3r "'dicms'". D3 NciJb:t NR.C Dcmal of ~Fxemprion:Requcst sr4.. A n:an's does 1b: C:@111issi10 ~ why a *demand elasticil;y abilil;y ID pass lbrougb a lmn:len IO its c:nsromm depends ~ 'W2S i1l!j caSIC' ot Jess OlSrly IO c:amp1etle tar .au die price cJasii, ir,es of sappiy amt dcrnaRJ '"Inelastic educariooal iosaioui m tlrm. for 'VF~ Thus 1IJe snppm:is and dernmleis. pay tiD:es-* Dan2Jd. N.. Co11'.1oiss.irds dt:nial of Jefief fiir UF amvcn::zs, both at Mcaoskey. 1lie Applied Theory af Plicc 324 (1982}.. ~ mk:mamg Jiud -~ cxrmptia1l sua;-es. cmnot be (While t&e iees are tednnc:Jly :not nms. lbe same vieied as ft":ascmed ~ak:ing *. principle applies to COSS ~-) BecrnS!! these 1 e1astic;mcs me. ~ hard to disaM!r with nmch coufideiicc. lb: Comoissian*s Idilsal. m read 1&c.mmte
as a~ xn:mdie 10 do so is not only undeisraodable t-9] bnt:r:es.onable..
113 We IIClle lhat" ior c*if111.=itioual UJSlitntjtms wilh c:ettain c.yp:s of 1icenscs, the =cmptimi is onavailab1e with t:etpect 1D dvities snr::h :ZS
It does not follow. boweve:r. that 1he OJmmissinn);
appli.c::ttion of the ~ was in CVery respect l't'?2SOD3ble-If~ ID pass the f=s Ibrough can be p&.ip,ined
witfr rcasonabJc accmacy and at n::ison,able COSL for
. ~ SCIVia:s - fp:zf..uwi:d mi'] oti=z' pezscm* and *ac:livities ~ unde.:r a
Gi:JvctillDCDt c:oorraa"'..
See JO
CFR
§ 17LJJ[a}(2) & £4). This exclusion fimr! 1be ~ . however. is liD:med to speaoc tyjlS of lic::nscs. mmicJy "byprodllct. sonrcc or sp:cial .:i - )
) ) 300 t.J:S.Agp.D.C. ~9)'.); 51RSF.2d J.46, ~150: 1993 u..S:.App.)lrX!... -,-4684.-10.
Page4 F'llJ An ~
snppcatci:l ntle... ~ need not* wssirn1ity r*I3J that lbe Oumoission may b.e able to jnsmy the lmle, and the *dimlptive ~ences cf
vacating._ we remand to th; Commission fur il 10 develop*
a D:aSODCd ttcalml:Ut af==mpticm ~ based on passtlnoogb limmmons.- ne.;es:,a*iily ~ vm:att:d. ~ e.g.;. bi:cmu:irimD1 Ulliotz, Comlmslian* P.nginei:fi11g also I2ised a. n:bttd TJMW~ FMSHA. 2l!7U,.S.App,...D-C.16tS, !J1JjF.2Jl_96Q, ~ . ~ Ioug-tem> fixed pace 966-67 (D..C Cir. I!)9{JJ: Maryltmd People~ Cmmm 11. ctmbacts ~ its St";CIDr of Ole halnstly COllSlia'iD i!s ability FER.C. 247 U..S.4pp.D.C333. 768F..U45tJ. 4S5(D.C:. to pass 1hn:nlgb costs and tbcn:forercqoicc some s6tt of . Or. 1985}: ICCJRE....mc.*,a. F~ 9BS F:Jd J(fl5. Slip op. gradual p1ias&-m.* See CrmiJDeJJts of Cambustmn at I2 (D.C.-Cil:.,.1993). Th: ~!)ll whdb:r to vai::a2I:. Fngioe=mt?,, Mai. 13. 1991 ar. 2. Ou tcmaud.
the
&pends an "t1:ia seiousness a.f' tm* mdcts dciic:iem:n
C111101issiunmustaddress this claimaswell.
' (and aims fhe ~ of'doribt wbe'.th=.r die 8FY c;fiosi; coaec::dy) arsd 1JJe d:¥:aptive co~ of an. interim . [*l.SlJ *change that may mdfbe ~ -~
CllUD1l. 920 P..:Uar9fi7.
It is ama:ivabie !hat Ole Ovrrrnission 7mif be able ta
c::xplain how lhc priucipl= sappor~ an c:cmpli.m iill' edrn:anonal jngjmtjms do not jaslify a simibir exemptimi

far

c3omesric VF amvedt:ts. Far edlnple. the Ou.tllbksian may deve1oJ, a ~
c:xpJffl!SJian based on an alta:uative jmtific:mon th.al. it affi:ied 1iJ! ~ lXDl-pI'Dfit edir2lional ~ ~
c:dm::mimml rcsca:rcb pnmd!:s ail impca.DUJl. b:m:6t10 $:
mu;:lear.industty and the pazlJljc at large and shoaJd u,;it b, diso:nua..aed..* 5.6 Fed. Reg. at 31~477 r'*12I n.. While this. ~ is qnne vague-the b:Df:fi%s af UF COUvt:isima can lmdJ_y lie depii.carcd mc::c1y becaDsC the con~~ in a a:mvc1llioDal ~perhaps the On11111is,;icm"s focus.is cm edrzemu;,n. wilh lhe idea.~ edm::arlon yieids ca::e¢uaa1lJ huge e::u:tnalized bctlefils ' ziiat cannGt be c:.ptmed ia tlimOD Ci" other 1JDGZt ~ ' ~ cmmot iell It 1hjs. poiut ~ !be° cumptia%l *fur edncatiomil fosliw*ior,s amld *be 1:asanably TQOfl:d in such a theory. ba:t flu!m is st least: a seoaas passibi&l;y thai: lbe Oi'111111istJ01J. will be _!lb1e m snhiawiare its
ded:.ion DD~
Ai1he same lime. the~ af~ m;sy be qm1e dis:tuptiff:. E'IICl assumiDg That WC couJd JDC:P:1y vacate the m1e.insafur ;;sit d#=DiCS an emupliaD far l'.JF . c:ouvcrte:rs. di:: (".rn1@issum would need ID n:fnn.d all 1990 OBRA. fees c:ol1edcd rrcim *those ~ in . adaition it evidently wonJd be 1Jilabie to m::over those fc:s under a Jau:F-c:nact=Imld. Sce.ilaw~ v. ~ U~ Hospi:ta[. 488 U.S. 2D4. 2fJ8..09, JOZ L. Ed. '2d 4!8. 109 s. Ct.. 468 (1988), (zjcding ~ appticntion of mles even if operan.ag -only to am: defeds in previonsfy ~ role). T&e:e~ ~ af 'die n Allied ' iuso' arp:s. 1bat 1Dc ' Gommissian'J ... app,lI1iomD:ln of fees' within the dass of dmm::sric 1JF .cunVCUCtS Yio1md ~ 1990 OBR.A..AI&ed argns (again witbotlt dispuie by tile ORI Uitissinn) 1fi.at it Jm required . nmdt 1css regD1a1ozy RUeurion drm the only Dim
~
of tie tir CQliile:.tter c1ass, the. Seqoa.y:dl Fm:ls
Coiponmon. betamc af ' tbc lands e

uviroimiemal problems. See NRC D=_aial af Allied~ luqUtSt
.lt 7- 'Ih,s.. Allied si:ys. sJJp,,_ation of lbe :fi=s equally between 1be JWti 1lF conueneu violated i:Iie 1990 OBRA'S din:clivcs shat OBRA clmgcs 'h= appariiQacd "'fiid.Y and equitably" aJld that "Jo the ma,,; j ti 111111 ateal.., J.-14] pG1c:tiaN,\\ the ~ shall. *have a n:zsonalile '. IC.lmioosmp JO Ilic CXISt of pmvidmg~ servu:::es.* Pub. L No. 101-,508. § '1.0l(c:)(3) (cadifii:d at.42 U..S.C. § 2214(c)C3)). Allied cont=ds that the C M111oi1sioa in=ad aag1it 10 liave divided ~ class's fees ei1beda prapmucm*m tbc rmmir: ofNRC w11w11icm requitecJ by each c;ou,n;m:r ar iJ:I pwpcstWU,a 1b: ~ (IOAA) f=spaid by the two COUVC(fe&S. ABia1's a.gmi.l,:Dt fails b::canse it disD!pnk th!: ~ that 1990 OBRA. iees me uat ~ Ibey do not rela!e tr,.identffi,,bJe ~a:s but iath:s-amSfinm: ;:r:niric c:oszs. Sec Bna1 blc. 56 Fed. Rq. ar 31.-172.
Assllmin~ th8l me O@mJssi.in com:aJ;y r'JassffieA the: cosa m 1JUeSD011 cana Allied does -
cmm:si the. dass:ffiesri011).. 1hcs'C is a pn:ssu:aplima !hat even rcgnlalmy l!ffort precii1itated by tlJe cii1:m11SfaJJCcS af a single ~ af i ~ c1s will yield l?Sdlls, such :as 11:Sealth ~or1Cfd]anions, of~y equal
impanance.furall membcG of the.same*class.
r-m1 This a:mr:1usmo
is not mile:uurned by im:
Commission's will"~ to appoiaou 1990 OBRA fees. j * 't ,1
/ \\ J ) 3001JS.. App. D.C.-198; 988 F.2.d 146. *1:52; . 1993 U.S. App.:lEXlS 4o84. -i4. ~ . gmaps ~l5J of llccnse:s* on !be '!mis of-th: c:iasscs, md m:i r.itionDk is Ieadily appaiem. While it is attcutionmpmcdbycachgronp.S=Enal'l~nte.54Fed. c:oru:emiblc that the =it 1>endit of llW dispasal Ri!g. az 31.476; I:ettr::r of NRC ~ .t'U}jed
sr:mccs is mcicly ~
availability of socb. set:viccs-io &emptiim. Request at 2. 4-5. First,. die spilJovcr af Wbicb case a *tliit fc: woidil 1imke scnso-a:uysucli idea is br:nefits seems far ~-witJJm a group cf'=ls.-es tirm in&msisui:nt 91th * \\be. Qu:nrmt:sion~
DJdhod of
~~Se= id. ar.S. Sccoud. the ail111i11is11a1i~. ~ ll.W
ica:$ among cl2sses _cf Jia:zisees;

cosis-af *~
appattuomd.111' are olMomly mm:h
wmch,appelllS IO ~
1hat be=6t is papirtioDa1 ID.
lower dian ~
appor1iuia.uem teause the LLW ~~ ~ OD the otb;I".hand. any !ic:nsc:cls nmnb:r af. Jia:nse:ei; gICilJy cx.c::ds the mmibc:r a( benefit iimo I.I.W rJitposa1 is-c'firec:dy ?.bj,<<tiaual lD its gJODpS;. uw* dispbsal, appomaning,:veil peric cam.on tile basis of omput seems ID make ~ mily. as to E='e. neith:r of Ille rnrasruins devia:s proposed ht ~ 1ml also as -1D individDa1 '6! e:a s_ F:imlly. Allied *was~ ar accurate c::magh to wiunmt rmi-
assm_niug 1ha1 she Qaomissiau ca'ln,Jan:d each clam Jioldnig the C'onmrlsmm"s tejeajan af' them -z.thizµly or

q~ of I.I.W ~
-~ daaa slippli:d bj c:aai capuciors. Any a:raeiaiion 'bc:twi::=:p a: iicemz!.e's lOAA, ~ {as seems n:ccssarily uuc)a it is ham rn sec ay ~) costt mid its. 1iene:lits fimn. geaer:ic arnni11ismrlive problem. wim appanimdug die ii=s widiiu aJStS. seems 1JUrely cninqdentaJ A:iJcl 10 meas a yan:lstid the class an 1'he basis af ampm; tiie dtsbi. iR awiJablc 2IJld each mcaihcr's tcDdcnc:y 1D precipiraie ~ effim th::. reqoiied ~ iuomdb! mdicoe@try. would not only disregard.spi1Jover ~ bat would mise exceptional ~emeut problems. Sec NRC Dc:mal,.'tt ,...
In applying die balancing of ~Umon aml
.Ailiec1 EJeo1ption Rt:qoest at 4-8.. lib: ases. vii: 'heie give Im1A ~ to die ~1ity that m Allied~ a lJliUOWCl attack DD 1he Q illlliiissioia's ~ . of m2r.l-groDp apponmnme:nt. namely that th: ComwissiC111 was arbitrary _iµJd c rq11 i iuas ia f:iilmg c--16] 1n apportion !he genetic coszs assoclaied with th: dispcfsal of low level miioactivc waste ("I.LW, an 1be basis of each liccus=:'$-aaual wasie. St= Final RJl1c. 'S6 Fed. 1let;. o:,; 31,497: 10 CFR § 171.I{i(c). h._ ct& 1evc1, 1hc a 11Miissioo :ailoca!ed coss in a:cmd:aucc. 'With. e:acb class'a. comribudon ro 1hc 10td qmmlity of. l:LW. Becatrs:e matl!ria1s iio:ns=s Ca group 1ha:t mctmks llF ~> coDcaivdy pate 409f> of t11e nsmon's
I.I..W: die Ottbmission dcrmPd ~
ofm LLW comm that dass. See id. Wlic:a it~ ID appuwc111111Qlt af dlOSD fees among the materials. Jj, -i,nsees. 1x>caii:11Ct. the Cn:irnnisman abzmdaol:::d 1bat *apprmdl am simply assessed each ~ fuel &cili1;y (of which Anied is c:me). SD idi:iJticd cflarBe of $ 143,500. fG:r e:pJ.anation. 1fJe. NRC offered cm1y the c:o.odmmy srarement 1ha1 "'the ComcilissiaD* - b:licvr:s - di: swcbalge sbouJd 'be 1h: same :for an ~ fad fiic:i1nf lie= = :s
See Filfa1 Role.
~ Cc,rmni:sqo-a rm1d pull a Je8SOD8b1e rap,Tanasirin Olll of the bat.. NoaemeJecs, ~ the imradasa [**18] apponbomem of U.W _casu
would gi\\'le Jicensees a pecotiar wiDd≪ ~
oaes lhat ~ from die Cttttooissum's d!oic!:: WDllld prc:sumabfy b: CDUlkd ID a rcfmJd. ind. Ullde:r" G~ rfaivemiy Hospiuzl. the IL W 4::0Sts cau1d be J'CCOue:n:d frcm no one. To be me.
the costs ~liJt gTeat. absolmely ar as*~ of Ifie:
tjniii1'1iss~ao"s S 46$ f.":153] miDioD ~ . mr FY
199..t-S 3.8 xailJian. Sec 56 Fe Rq. at.31.4:86. 31.4W.
Bm iiaalcmeis basdly a~ to aeab!: SDcb a winc1ralL.
.Acc:aJ;diDgly. ve IChiD jjmn nt.atmg the mlt:. If aa

remand Ifie C 1m10issinq conc:Judcs that tm:
apparnom=nt mmt be iD m::caida:nce with DSBge. lfma lbase: fims llUbase. bardcn is ~ miler a new. ~. mlc should be euodci:i.ID ~ .of t}e diffeD::nce. Jf indeed' the. n:maad leads ID eplac:emem: of de *. . per-lia:mcc alb:ancm. md W"1"11S"J"S eqjaJ, cmJy ~ 56Fetl.R4,!f[31.'l8J. far tbe diffismcc baweaa liabilil;y anoer 1be old rule aal 1i:abilig midi:l'die *new {ndher"tlam 1Dtal n:fimds). it miglil be m'gli::d 11m sndl a RSldt allows aim~ JBle 1D bali ~n:aoaczjve. ~. iD vjo1azjan of Ga>rr~ ' r;~ T:laspim1. °Sa 488 U.S. ai 208. '1'hem [.. l9J Toe Commission provides * :no raliona1e-for a_. plainly. same renoacme c:mu. m= dftct. howe,,a. apportioning costs among classes ofll.W p.rodna::G an is only to ddine that aspect of me oJd mJc that DIUSt ~ rhe bm;is of!LW mnpm but rc:fusing ID app~ that ~ -
cur trlli'a] as leplly_ excessive. We do' not real ymdstick m _appaniamDg gcu=lic COSIS C-17] ~ ~
gamim as &aning so limited a n:m:mcave impact.
/ ,J ). IV Fiml1Y. OJmbiistian i:..~... cmiDein me ~"'1:5 ZCi Carm,rlss:ion's decision 10 allo::ale OJ3RA f=s eqnally to ~
low l!l'Jricbt;l m:anfum ('LEtr) ~-
lianse ~ of divimD: tiJc :fi:i:s ~ 2IIDDDg the LEO.mauu&cmring ~ ~ owns. ana ~ we reject it fur th.!* reasons Slitted as to Allied: .. OJmbusticn*s c:xeni:paon ~ mweve:r. ~ l'ft.- C ~ ** 3 mcnt. ~ -iiiiililiSSIDIL. O'Vll. aiteQa c:aJI fur an e.xezilpUoD jf file lin:n~ can snow !bat "die assessrnr=.t: ~ me 11JDD1a1 "fi:c 'WOUid tcsUh ia a sigoitita111ly cµspiOioaioo:are. aJkc:aricm of CCJSIS tp. the 1R:nsce.* 10 crR. §.17LJ1(;1/.. 'I.be doubJa essc:ss:mezrt agamsc Combustian's two liee'Jises im:,eiw its OBRA fees by s 836;;500. Apt 2fDs.. *the Commission.is alie io poiJli lD ilmdst 40thing,by 'Way of~ COSIS. *Spealing to lhe issue in mmsnally DDJd:y. dm:msive laugm;c. 1bc NRC .in Sllbsumcc rmdd point 10 only two additian81
opi::rm:s twoll:U :fac;,lifics;. cadJ sepmarcly ~
and Combusiima asserts-*~ in the a~ 11= tw? are _ operatiouaIJy _cquivalest. to the ~ sia~ :facilities of. the othe:ri.EU ~ At. m:a1 mpmeDi ~ e:planrd that it bas two lia:Ds= ~ the iacmlirs only b:cmse Df bismtical r:hancc; it ~g)lt a a:mrpany wi1h a. s:parale 1icellse almost 20 J=S ago aocl mUil dJi:I Cuwwissio:D impJeu)\\!Sued the ~ OBRA a. sc:aedaJ:e 1bae bas
bmdc:as--dJC n=:d. Ii> mail an. rma copy of cz::npm NRC.
paMi atious to ibe secoad ~ ml th= need, b tlllO diffe:ac:ntNRC n:gioDaJ af6ces tn mommr m* ICS!)QDd1o f"1:;4] atlepliOlis about !be lWD p1mm. See:NRCDemal . never been mJ ieason 10 c:ansotid'atl, die.lic=oses- 'A:i be:fom. lbl: Com111fss'i11n d;.spute:s none of thse ~ ~.* ofCambusritm =wptiJu ~ ats-6.. Com1mstiall attacb b:,th = n::;nJmion: imp 1$ ins tbe
*eqma1 ~
per lic:nse-mle and tJJe.Ce11111~im"s deDia1 'The. double ban= ur* Combastion. m:asmm. af aa-=rmptian. r-*20] Bah claimc :rest olriimdeb' on ~ de.mininzi.1: adiomd bmdem.. fir Im the 199().0BRA~ diieaiua om: fees JDDSt be l!JiP(JCtioDm *. - Coil eoisic af. amp1y* ovi:.*, a @es 1be hmdle esa:at@;bed by "f;zmy, mid ~ and dm "'JD 1IJe maximum e:xlelll. 10- CFR.§. 111.JI(d)_ :i:tS ~ the' =uptioD denial is ~ pxti~ - clmges shall..have a xcasombJc aihitrn:y Gd ~ We. 1heie.iiue cm=t* fie. mmiansmp to the cost of po.. ~ n:gularmy, scmccs.* Caoiarissioa to grmt a e:x.empion & C'cmbosiicin on Jiub. LNo.101-508. §,6101(c)(3} (ccdi5ed at 42 U.S.C. the ec:JdjzyJoa't :fi=s. c:o1lc::lz:d as a
remit cir lb:.
f 22.14{c:){3)). AJthaugb we find *lbc fizst claim ~Jiceming[-'22] afitsoperalion. 816. ~ we ~ thiat the c,iwoissi1111 bas.not -jasiificd US Jefusm lO IJivcth: 1i::qucsted exe:wp~ 11:e: arpnmt tmr the *=iaat fee p:r Jja:nsz:* :nde is "m!fiiir. and meqnJteb1[e]"' is petSWISltl'C on1J OD ihe ground mat. Jhe ruJc prodncm traDblmg results when applied. to C.ornbustioii's circtam,;r~wmc:h Com'busaan itself assetlS arc mmsrsaJ We see DO xcason far~ du: C s11111issioo ID aucad :ro dmtDl!hF*= smia!ion m 111e nae itseJt cf. NI.RB 1t..Bdl ~ Co.. 416 U.S. 267. 4D L SL 2tl. JM. 94 S. CL n57 * (1974}. cspecialJy as the generic mJe allowed . ~)far~n4. n4 Iusofar BS CoiiabusnaJJ &rgneS.* in ~ with Allied. that § 610l(c)(3) of OBRA. ~ require$ ~~on tt=,basisof faams such as die rmuitt qf attz:rm01I' a liccDsee ~ the compewive pasmou af die lioeosee, and *.rhe* safd.y risJ::!; posed by the ~ u5 10 CFR § m.ll(d) also CODtamS-two alb=' im:tois that the Commission sbaD CDDSidcz' '9lbcll. i':VDJustin.z BD excmiman ~ Although paitS of § !11.ll(d) me ambignaus rcgazmag ~ ~ applictiai: mast fulfill an. Gr' mi!y Ollej or dJC facims. 1.i= fai:t Chat a applicaDt could JKJt "fDHili-ihe cmr::rian Jisl:d in § 171.ll(d)(D)-*aij, mht=a" iel=vZlllt n:iancc that 1h: ficc:lzsc: bcliic:YC:S shows that the mnmal ii=* was l10t based cm a Dir and c:qmh1e llloanion of NRC COSlS"--n:.'VC:als that the "'fac:lixs**shouJd n be K8d es c:aqjonaiite :xeqain:meuts. 1lie farmrs inmc:ad s::cm rr:> ~ best mde.isrwd asblepeudrnt consideamam 'Wbidi rm SDppOrt,an c::u:mption. a6We me 120t ~ to addri:sri Allied's fee ex=nption, ~ becallsc: of our pr=viout ~ af.A1lh::cfs alba daims. 'Jhc a:speas aF Affi,ed's 11:CJU=t dcaJmg with passth:lough
*'! )
I / \\ J ) P~1 . 300 U.S. App. p.C.19$~988 F.1d l~,;;154:* 199;3 U:S.Ap1d~4684;~ * }1billty _md 11.W fees are al~ cemrln to smnd or f4i along wj$,.~ remand.eil clamls;* Bnd the*
_.aspe:t.
claiming thst OBRA. ~ . ~calibmon of fees fails. re:ts?l£d anp. coheretit tn::mi.teut of Cl} '.6a:nsee:s' cbints 1).r ::~ trealliicrl. on the basis of Iilllbilitj. lI) p:iss ma .. r,~L,.11 t:If the rees th:n:itlgh ~ cnstoJi:ICl"i and {zj die
r1&ru.nd of appamoning ~
ILW dispPS2l ctl5IS '"~w:ilg materials 1ia:nsee<t ln aqditinn, we*~ tile * . (.a:,*scission to g7301 mi c:xanption lD Caillbnstion rort11e
end i

led;, :iuz:,NJ!Jihk: to the ~
af iis r:EO~on. Sc.oriID-ed. We JCmmJii the case* 10 the Oirnm:issiim fer a *
1. I.
I -*1.

~-

. *-,}}

ML17348A377

Text

0.0 PROGRAM

1.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

2.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.7 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

1.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

6.6 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

0.0 PROGRAM

-1 I==i

Navigation menu

Search