ML17347A201
| ML17347A201 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 12/11/1986 |
| From: | Mcdonald D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8612180253 | |
| Download: ML17347A201 (22) | |
Text
'
December ll, 1986 Docket Nos.
50-250 DISTRIBUTION, and 50-251
.id id NRC PDR D. Miller LICFNSEE: Florida Power and Light Company Local PDR OGC PAD¹2 Rdg E. Jordan FACILITY: Turkey Point Plant Units 3 and 4
J. Partlow G. Grimes L. Rubenstein ACRS (10)
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF MEETING HELD WITH FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY (FPL),
NOVEMBER 18,
- 1986, REGARDING TURKEY POINT PLANT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Background
Members of the NRC staff met with the licensee's representatives at Bethesda, Maryland, to discuss revision of the Turkey Point Plant Units 3 and 4 Technical Specifications.
The licensee is converting the existing custom plant Technical Specifications to the format and content of the Standard Technical Specifications for Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactors (NUREG-0452).
~Sumar This meeting (list of attendees enclosed) was a followup to meetings held August 28, 1984, July 17, 1985, February 6, 1986 and March 21, 1986.
These previous meetings were held to discuss details relating to the purpose for the revisions, status, integration with ongoing efforts and procedures relating to licensing approval.
By letter dated September 29, 1986, the licensee submitted proposed revisions to the Turkey Point Plant Technical Specifications.
The submittal did not include those areas related to fire protection and electrical power systems.
The sections related to electrical power systems, which will be submitted in early December, and a request to delete the existing Fire Protection Technical Specifications which will soon be submitted in accordance with guidance provided in Generic Letter 86-10.
The licensee's representatives provided an updated review of the background, development constraints and the final product as the result of the Technical Specification upgrade effort.
An outline of the presentation is enclosed.
The staff discussed their review process and proposed schedule which is also enclosed.
Both parties agreed that the proposed Technical Specification revisions will not result in the requirement for plant hardware changes and will reflect the current Turkey Point Plant design and analytical basis which are supported by the existing approved Technical Specifications.
The staff indicated that their review of the proposed Technical Specifications would be performed in accordance with NRR Office Letter No. 38, "Procedures For Revision To Technical Specifications,"
as applied to licensed plants.
Bbi2180253 8bi21 1 PDR" ADOCK 05000250 P
$g PDR
0 l
C The initial submittal is considered a draft proposal and the updated submittal, currently scheduled for June 22, 1987, will be the request which the staff will review and approve for replacement of the existing custom Technical Specifications.
It was indicated that the proposed Sholly Notice will be revised and noticed when the updated submittal is provided for staff review and approval.
The variances, deviations and justifications will be reviewed by the staff for acceptability in relation to the plants existing design and constraints.
The time necessary to implement the upgraded Technical Specifications wi'll be determined prior to issuance of the amendments to the licenses, thus assuring an orderly and safe transition period.
The NRC licensing staff, Regional staff and the licensee's staff agreed that the proposed schedule will require close interaction by all parties and any necessary changes or modifications will be incorporated as the review process proceeds.
OrJginal Signed by Daniel G. McDonald, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate P2 Division of Pl<R Licensing-A
Enclosures:
1.
Meeting Attendees 2.
Licensee Presentation 3.
Proposed Schedule cc w/enclosures:
See next page PM!P 2
0:
2 DMcDonald:ab
, LRubens ein 12/ i(/86 12/ff /86
0
'i tj k
Mr. C. 0.
Woody Florida Power and Light Company Turkey Point Plant CC:
Harold F. Reis, Fsquire Newman and Holtzinger, P.C.
1615 L Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036 Mr. ilack Shreve Office of the Public Counsel
.Room 4, Holland Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Norman A. Coll, Esquire
- Steel, Hector and Davis 4000 Southeast Financial Center Miami, Florida 33131-2398
~r.
C.
M. Wethy, Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power and Light Company P.O.
Box 029100 Miami, Florida 33102 Mr. M. R. Stierheim County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County Miami, Florida 33130 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station Post Office Box 57-1185 Miami, Florida 33257-1185 Mr. Allan Schubert, Manager 0<fice of Radiation Control Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1317 Winewood Blvd.
Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Intergovernmental Coordination and Review Office of Planning 5 Budget Fxecutive Office of the Governor The Capitol Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Administrator Department o< Environmental Regulation Power Plant Siting Section State of Florida 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Suite 2900 101 Marietta Street Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Martin H. Hodder, Esquire 1131 NE, 86th Street Miami, Florida 33138
)oette Lorion 7269 SW, 54 Avenue Miami, Florida 33143 Mr. Chris J. Baker, >lant Manager Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power and Light Company P.O.
Box 029~.00 Miami, Florida 33102 Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs The Capitol Tallahassee, Florida 32304
ENCLOSURE 1
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS MEETING LIST OF ATTFNDFES NOVFMBER 18,1o86 Daniel G. HcDonald Calvin W. Moon Victor Benaroya Debbie Miller Jesus Arias, Jr.
Fred Flugger William A. Skelley John Shettz Thomas C. Grozan Cecil Wethy Scott Newberry Paul Pace Bruce Wilson Mitzi Young TITLE NRR Proiect Manager NRR FOB-A NRR FOBA-A NRR PAD¹P FPL PTN FPL Engineering FPL Engineerinq FPL Engineerino FPL Licensing FPL Site V-P NRR FOB FPL Nuclear Licensinq NRR Region II, Section Chief NRR OGC
ENCLOSURE 2
TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 8 0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVISION PROJECT PEP PROJECT 10 BACKGROUND HISTORY CRITERIA PROJECT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS MARGIN OF SAFETY VARIANCE FROM STS DESIGN AND HARDSHIP FINAL PRODUCT GENERIC IMPROVEMENTS FORMAT AND CONTENT IMPROVEMENTS CONCLUSIONS
TURKEY POINT UNITS 5 8 4 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVISION PROJECT PEP PROGRAM 10 ORIGINAL LICENSE TURKEY POINT OPERATES NITH CUSTOM TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS COMMITMENT AND ORDER FPL COMMITMENT (APRIL 1984)
IMPLEMENT STS PHILOSOPHY AND GUIDANCE INTO PLANT PROCEDURES USE STS AS BASIS IN FUTURE TECH SPEC SUBMITTALS COMFIRMED BY NRC ORDER (JULY 1984)
PEP PROJECT 10 FPL VOLUNTARILYDECIDED TO REVISE CURRENT TECH SPECS COMPLETE UPGRADE AND REPLACEMENT PROGRAM STS FORMAT AND CONTENT MITHIN LIMITATIONS PEP PROJECT 10 INITIATED(8/10/84)
TURKEY POINT UNITS 5 8 4 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVISION PROJECT PEP PROGRAN 10 DEVELOPNENT CRITERIA NAINTAIN THE CURRENT PLANT CONFIGURATION NAINTAIN THE CURRENT PLANT ANALYTICALBASIS REASONABLE RESOURCE ADDITIONS
TS REVISION LOGIC 0
LIST 8
INPUT JPf. NED STAFF REVIEW SYSTEM REVIEW FIRST DRAFT TS PLANT STAFF REVIEW QTE TEAM COLLECTS COMMENTS COMMENTS RESOLVED AND/OR INCORPORATE D
~ECHTEL INPUT GEN. ENGL
- FUELS, OTHERS REVIEW PHASE!
PROCEDURES
'EVISED PROCEDURES IMPLEMENTED OPERATIONAL FEEDIACK FINE TUNE TS
. PREPARE LICKNSING SURMITTAL PHASE 11 SURMIT TS TO NRC RESOLVE NRC COMMKNTS
~UIUC HEARING QF REQUIRED)
LICENSE REVIQON ISSUED PHASE ill
/l
-L 7 g/
rp~
d 1
C
~
~
~
0
TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 8 0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVISION PROJECT PEP PROJECT 10 VARIANCE FROM STS 100X TOTAL COMPLIANCE REVISED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CURRENT. PTP TECHNICAL SPEC IFICATIONS OX
TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 8 4 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVISION PROJECT PEP PROJECT 10 VARIANCE FROM STS 100X TOTAL COMPLIANCE HARDSHIP PLANT DESIGN OWNERS GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS REMOVED FIRE PROTECTION REVISED PTP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 8 0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVISION PROJECT PEP PROJECT '10 VARIANCE FROM* STS PLANT DESIGN SHARED ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (6)
SHARED SI SYSTEM (2)
COMMON RHR SUCTION/DISCHARGE LINE (2)
NO SPRAY SYSTEM CHEMICAL ADDITIVES (1)
NO 8 INCH RB PURGE R EXHAUST LINES (1)
POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT CHARGING PUMPS (2)
MULTIPURPOSE RB ISOLATION SIGNAL (I)
ANALOG IRPI SYSTEM (3)
PARTICULATE/GASEOUS DETECTORS NOT REDUNDANT (3)
TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 8 0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVISION PROJECT PEP PROJECT 10 VARIANCE FROM STS HARDSHIP
RESPONSE
TIME TESTING RB PURGE 8 EXHAUST VALVE SURVEILLANCE PERIOD RCS BOUNDARY VALVES TEST AFTER FLOW RCS BOUNDARY VALVE LEAKAGE (PART OF IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE)
TEST OF ACCUMULATOR ISO VALVE ENTRY INTO MODES 2 8 3 PRIOR TO TESTING MSIV'S ENTRY INTO MODES 2 8 3 INOPERABLE TURBINE OVERSPEED PROTECTION CORE ALTERATIONS DIRECTLY SUPERVISED VS OBSERVED AND DIRECTLY SUPERVISED AIR LOCK LEAKAGE RATE
C
TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 8 0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVISION PROJECT PEP PROJECT 10 RELAXATIONS
'FROM CURRENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 52 RELAXATIONS RELAXATIONS CONSISTANT WITH STS EACH JUSTIFIED IN THE NSHE EXANPLES TESTING OF SI/RHR/SPRAY PUNPS (31 D TO 92 D)
RCS BORON CONCENTRATION (2/WK TO 31 EFPD)
TESTING OF BORIC ACID FLOW CONTROLLER-(DELETED)
BAT LEVEL CHANNEL CHECK-(DELETED)
BAT BORON CONCENTRATION (2/WK TO 1/HK)
INOPERABLE RNS (08 HRS TO 7 D)
INOPERABLE ECCS EQUIPNENT (08 HRS TO 72 HRS)
TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 8 0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVISION PROJECT PEP PROJECT 10 GENERIC IIYIPROVENENTS ALIGNS PTP MITH INDUSTRY CONSISTENCY BETHEEN FPL PLANTS INPROVED FORNAT AND CONTENT EXPLICIT LCO/APPL/ACTION STATENENTS NININIZE INTERPRETATION PROBLENS
TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 8 0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVISION PROJECT PEP PROJECT 10 FORMAT AND CONTENT IMPROVEMENTS STS FORMAT NEW TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS IMPROVED/ADDED/MORE RESTRICTIVE SURVE ILLANCES IMPROVED/ADDED MORE RESTRICTIVE LCO'S ALL 20 83/125 39/125 IMPROVED/ADDED/MORE RESTRICTIVE ACTION STATEMENTS 05/125
TURKEY POINT UNITS 3
& 4 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVISION PROJECT PEP PROJECT 10 CONCLUSIONS THE REVISED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
REPRESENT THE BEST PROGRAM FOR ADOPTION OF THE STANDARD TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CONSIDERING THE TURKEY POINT SYSTEM
- DESIGNS, ANALYTICALBASIS, AND OPERATING STAFF.
REPRESENTS AN IMPROVEMENT IN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
- FORMAT, CONTENT, AND CLARITY.
EXCEEDS THE ORIGINAL NRC COMMITMENTS IN THE APRIL 11, 1984 LETTER THAT HAS LATER PLACED UNDER ORDER IN JULY 1984.
REPRESENTS AN UNPRECEDENTED INDUSTRY PROGRAM FOR CUSTOM TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION UPGRADE.
ENCLOSURE 3
TURKEY POINT 3 4'
- TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CONVERSION SCHEDULE Request to Amend License Supplement to Request - Electrical Power First Draft to Licensee Plant Visit Resolution of Differences Second Draft to Licensee Comments from Licensee on Second Draft Final Draft to Licensee Comments from Licensee on Final Draft Licensee resubmittal of Amendment Request Completion of SER 9/29/86
]1/
/86 12/31/86 1/14-16/87 2/13/87 3/06/87 3/23/87 5/01/87 5/18/87 6/22/87 8/21/87