ML17346A829
| ML17346A829 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point |
| Issue date: | 02/04/1985 |
| From: | FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17346A828 | List: |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737 PROC-850204, NUDOCS 8502080362 | |
| Download: ML17346A829 (27) | |
Text
PROCEDURES GENERATION PACKAGE Turkey Point Plant Unit3 and Unit4 8502080362 850204(
PDR ADOCK 05000250 F
t
PROCEDURES GENERATIONPACKAGE TABLEOF CONTENTS SECTION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
1 ~2 SCOPE
~
~
~
~
~
\\
~
~
~
0
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
1.3 ORGANIZATION 2.0 PLANT-SPECIFIC TECHNICALGUIDELINES 2.1 GENERAL PAGE 4
~
~
~
~
4 4
5 2.2 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION.........;..... ~......
6 3.0 WRITERS GUIDE FOR EOPs 3.1 GENERAL 3.2 DOCUMENTDESCRIPTION 4.0 EOP VERIFICATIONPROGRAM 4.1 GENERAL 4.2 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 5.0 EOP VALIDATIONPROGRAM 5.1 GENERAL 8
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
\\
8
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
9 9
~
~
~
~
0
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
10 5.2 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION.....,................
10 6.0 EOP TRAININGP ROGRAM 6.1 GENERAL 6.2 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 6.3 TRAININGPROGRAM GOALS
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
1 1
~
~
~
~
~
~
0
~
~
~
~
~
11
'PG-1/P6P/ec-1/18/85 2 of 16
tf I
PROCEDURES GENERATIONPACKAGE TABLEOF CONTENTS SECTION 6.0 EOP TRAININGP ROG RAM (Cont'd) 6.4 INITIALEOP TRAININGMETHODS 6.5 REQUALIFICATIONTRAINING 6.6 TRAININGON REVISIONS TO EOPs PAGE 12 13 6.7 INPUTS INTOTRAININGPROGRAM CHANGES.......
13 6.8 EVALUATION 13 Plant Specific Deviation Documentation Sheet............
14 Turkey Point Plant Writers Guide forEmergencyOperatingProcedures 16
'PG-1/PGPIec-1/18i8S 3of 16
PROCEDURES GENERATIONPACKAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Procedures Generation Package (PGP) is to describe the Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs) development at Turkey Point Plant Units 3 and 4 which are Westinghouse 3 - loop pressurized water reactors.
1.2 SCOPE This document was developed in response to Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737, Item 7.2b, Page 15.
1.3 ORGANIZATION 0
This document consists ofthe followingsix parts:
Section 1.0 Introduction Section 2.0 Section 3.0 Section 4.0 Section 5.0 Plant Specific Technical Guidelines Writers Guide for EOPs EOP VerificationProgram EOP Validation Program Section 6.0 EOP Training Program Each part describes the approach taken as part of the overall EOP Implementation Plan forTurkey Point Plant Unit 3 and Unit4.
'PG-1/PGP/ec-I 1~'!l5 4 of 16
PROCEDURES GENERATIONPACKAGE 2.0 PLANT-SPECIFIC TECHNICALGUIDELINES 2.1 GENERAL 2.1.1 The following program for converting the Westinghouse Owners Group Emergency
Response
Guidelines (ERGs) into EOPs has been developed and will be used by Turkey Point Plant Unit 3 and Unit4.
2.1.2 2.1.3 The Westinghouse Owners Group Emergency
Response
Guidelines, Revision 1, dated September 1, 1983, will be used for the implemented EOPs.
The followingmajor items'were considered in the methodology to be used:
1.
Mechanics ofconversion 2.
Location ofthe plant-specific technical information 3.
How the plant-specific technical information willbe used 4.
The use ofexisting EOP's 5.
Documentation requirements 6.
Use of the background information supplied with technical guidelines
'PG-liPGPiet' l8/85 5 of 16
t C
k'
PROCEDURES GENERATIONPACKAGE 2.2 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 2.2.1 Mechanics ofConversion 1 P~i The designated EOP writing team willobtain andreview the following Plant-specific Technical Information (EOP source documents):
a.
Westinghouse Owners Group Emergency
Response
Guidelines (ERGs), Revision 1, with background information b.
FSAR Unit 3 and Unit4 c.
Turkey Point Plant Writers Guide for,.Emergency Operating Procedures d.
Technical Specifications for Unit 3 and Unit4 e.
The most current revision ofexisting EOPs f.
As-builtplant drawings 2.
Writin Plant S ecific EOPs from Westin house ERGs The EOP writing team willfollow the ERG's step-by-step, adding footnoted information where designated.
Concurrently, the writers will review appropriate EOP source documents.
The use of plant specific technical information or analysis resulting from plant unique design willbe included to the ERG'format. The inclusion of these design requirements will be covered by two separate documents, the Basis Document, which outlines the logic used for inclusion of the step into the ERG, and the Transition Document, which delineates the flow of information from the ERGs to the plant specific EOPs. The Basis Document is described in O-ADM-109, Writers Guide for EOPs, forTurkey Point.
'PG-1'P" P/ec-1/18i85 6of 16
'J
PROCEDURES GENERATIONPACKAGE 2.2 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 2.2.1 Mechanics ofConversion (Cont'd) 3.
Plant S ecific Deviation Form Plant specific differences generated between generic guidelines and plant specific EOPs willbe documented on the deviation form shown in Enclosure
- 1. This form will provide the technical justification for step deviations between the generic guidelines and the plant 'specific procedures.
4.
Transition from Existin EOPs to the U raded Plant eci icEOPs The EOP writing team will ensure that required information in the existing EOPs is properly incorporated into the upgraded plant specific EOPs which are derived from the Westinghouse ERGs. This willbe accomplished by means of a Transition Document, detailed in the Turkey Point EOP Writers Guide, O-ADM-109.
2.2.2 Documentation The completed Transition Documents will be provided as a
source document to assist in the EOP verification process and in the revision, review and approval process.
7 of 16
0
PROCEDURES GENERATIONPACKAGE 3.0 WRITERS GUIDE FOR EOPs 3.1 GENERAL 3.1.1 A writers guide for EOPs is a plant-specific document that provides instructions for writing EOPs.
In addition to establishing sound writing principles, the guide helps to promote consistency'among all EOPs and their revisions, independent ofthe number ofEOP writers.
3.1.2 The writers guide will be revised, as necessary, based on feedback from operator training, experience, and procedure validation.
3.2 DOCUMENTDESCRIPTION 3.2.1 Information on the following major items is included in the plant-specific writers guide forEOPs.
1.
EOP format 2.
EOP organization 3.
EOP content 4.
Mechanics ofstyle 3.2.2 The Turkey Point Plant Writers Guide for Emergency Operating Procedures, is based on both the industry document Emergency Operating Procedures Writing Guideline (INPO 82-017), and the Writers Guide for Emergency
Response
Guidelines dated September 1, 1983, developed by the Westinghouse Owners Group.
'PG-1/PGP/el:
~ 1/18/85 8 of 16
0
'I
PROCEDURES GENERATIONPACKAGE 4.0 EOP VERIFICATIONPROGRAM 4.1 GENERAL EOP verification is the evaluation performed to confirm the written correctness of the procedure and to ensure that applicable generic and plant-specific technical information has been incorporated properly.
This evaluation also checks that the human factors aspects presented in the writers guide forEOPs have been applied.
4.2 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 4.2.1 When developing this EOP verification program, the following major items were considered:
1.
How EOP verification willbe performed 2.
How completion of the EOP verification process will be documented 4.2.2 4.2.3 3.
What process willbe used in resolving discrepancies The verification program is based on the industry document Emergency Operating Procedures Verification Guideline (INPO 83-004), developed by the EOPIA Review Group and published by INPO.
The Turkey Point Plant verification procedure for emergency operating procedures is provided in Administrative Procedure 0-ADM-110 and addresses the followingobjectives:
l.
EOPs are technically correct, i.e, they accurately reflect the technical guidelines and other EOP source documents 2.
EOPs are written correctly, i.e., they accurately reflect the Plant-specific Writers Guide 3.
A correspondence exists between the procedures and the control room/plant hardware 4.
The language and level of information presented in the EOPs are compatible with the qualifi'cations, training, and experience ofthe operating staff
'PG-llPGP/ec I/18i85 9 of 16
PROCEDURES GENERATION PACKAGE 5.0 EOP VALIDATIONP ROGRAM 5.1 GENERAL EOP validation is the evaluation performed to determine that the actions specified in the procedure can be performed by the operator to manage the emergency conditions effectively. The methodology for EOP validation utilizes present, available methods at the Turkey Point Plant while recognizing and allowing for future improvements.
The EOP validation will evaluate the operators'bility to manage emergency conditions using the EOPs. It willvalidate that part of the EOP not covered by any technical validation ofgeneric technical guidelines.
5.2 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 5.2.1 When developing this EOP validation program, the following major items were'considered:
1.
How EOP validation willbe performed 2.
How to appropriately use walk-throughs or table-top methods ofvalidation 3.
How operating and training experience willbe integrated into the program evaluation 4.
The evaluation criteria to be applied and the methods to be followed in resolving discrepancies 5.
How completion of the EOP validation process will be documented 5.2.2 The program is based on the industry document Emergency Operating Procedures Validation Guideline, (INPO 83-006),
developed by the EOPIA Review Group and published by INPO.
The Turkey Point Plant validation procedure for emergency operating procedures is provided in Administrative Procedure 0-ADM-111 and addresses the followingobjectives:
1.
EOPs are usable, i.e. they can be understood and followed without confusion, delays, and errors 2.
A correspondence exists between the procedures and the control room/plant hardware 3.
The instructions presented in the EOPs are compatible with the shift manpower, qualifications, training, and experience ofthe operating staff 4.
A high level of assurance exists that the procedures will work, i.e., the procedures guide the operator in mitigating transients and accidents
'PG.1/PG P!ec-1/18/85 10 of 16
PROCEDURES GENERATIONPACKAGE 6.0 EOP TRAININGP ROGRAM 6.1 GENERAL The EOP training program was developed to support implementation of the EOPs. The EOP writer interfaces with the Training Department to ensure a supportive program.
6.2 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 6.2.1 When developing the EOP training program, the following major items were considered:
1.
What type of operator training should be provided (initial, requali fication)
I:
2.
What method ofoperator training should be followed 3.
What operator knowledge and skilllevel is desired 4.
What training material is needed to support EOP training requirements 5.
What current operator licensing requirements exist 6.. What method should be provided for operator feedback into the training program and EOP development 6.3 TRAININGPROGRAM GOALS 6.3.1 The initial,overall training goals for the EOP training program are as follows:
1.
To enable the operators to understand the structure of the EOPs 2.
To enable the operators to understand the technical basis of the EOPs 3,
To enable the operators to use the EOPs under operational conditions 6.3.2 Training program objectives to support these goals will be developed for each lesson plan.
'PG-IiPGP/ec. 1i18i85 11 oF 16
g,
PROCEDURES GENERATIONPACKAGE 6.4 INITIALEOP TRAININGMETHODS The EOP training program is established to instruct operators in the EOPs. The program consists of classroom instruction and procedure walk-throughs. Non-plant specific simulator exercises willbe conducted when available but is not considered a requirement for EOP implementation.
6.4.1 Classroom Instruction Classroom i'nstruction sessions will be conducted.
Included in the information presented during this method will be the following:
1.
The logic behind the development ofEOPs 2.
The process used to develop the EOPs 3.
The EOPs themselves, including supporting technical and human-factors information 6.4.2 'rocedure Walk-Throu hs An important part of the instruction on EOPs will be the practical experience gained through procedure walk-throughs.
This walk-through training will also concentrate on information flowand interaction with the physical plant.
6.4.3 Similator Exercises Training on the EOPs will be conducted for all licensed operators using scenarios on a non-plant specific simulator.
Training willbe conducted with all operators p'erforming their normal control room functions.
Until the plant-specific simulator is completed, complicated scenarios willbe discussed during classroom instruction and procedure walk-throughs.
'VG.!iPGP>ec.! I!8i85 12 of 16
-PROCEDURES GENERATIONPACKAGE 6.5 RE UALIFICATIONTRAINING All licensed operators will conduct procedural walk-throughs for refresher training. The walk-throughs may be conducted either in the plant control room or at a simulator.'imulator scenarios will be as described in Section 6.4.3. Simulator exercises willbe evaluated by the Nuclear Training Department or Operations Department Supervision.
Evaluation results willbe critiqued for feedback to the operators and to determine additional training needs.
6.6 TRAININGON REVISIONS TO EOPs Training on revisions to EOPs willbe accomplished through a program of required readings (self taught), pre-shift briefings, or lectures in the requalification program. Determination of appropriate methods willbe made by the Nuclear Training Department.
6.7 INPUTS INTOTRAININGPROGRAM CHANGES 6.7.1 Su ortin Trainin Material Chan es Changes to supporting training material will be factored into updated lesson plans and operator memos.
Some of the supporting material identified to date is as follows:
1.
ERGs 2.
Background Information 3.
Associated WCAPs 6.7.2 0 erator Feedback Operator feedback resulting from EOP verification, EOP validation, and training critique forms willbe used to keep the training program and EOPs current and relevant, 6.8 EVALUATION An evaluation will be performed to ensure that the training program goals have been accomplished.
'PG-1IPGP/ec-I/18/85 13 of 16
PROCEDURES GENERATIONPACKAGE ENCLOSURE 1
Turkey Point Plant Plant Specific Deviation Documentation Sheet
'PG-1/PGP/ec-1/18/85 14 of 16
~ ~
~
~
4 J
I
~
~
PROCEDURES GENERATION PACKAGE ATTACHMENT1 TURKEYPOINT PLANT WRITERS GUIDE FOR EMERGENCY OPERATINGPROCEDURES
- P6-1/PGP/ec. 1/18/85 16 of 16
li
~
~