ML17342A963
| ML17342A963 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 10/13/1987 |
| From: | Herdt A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17342A961 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-250-87-41, 50-251-87-41, NUDOCS 8710160224 | |
| Download: ML17342A963 (1) | |
Text
ENCLOSURE 1
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Florida Power and Light Company Turkey Point Docket Nos.
50-250 and 50-251 License Nos.
DPR-31 and DPR-41 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on September 21-25,
- 1987, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
The violation involved failure to perform post-modification testing.
In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,"
10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1986), the violation is listed below:
10 CFR 50 Appen'dix B, Criterion XI, as implemented by Florida Power and Light Topical Quality Assurance Report FPLTQAR 1-76A and TQR 11.0, entitled Test Control, requires in part that testing be performed to assure that structures,
- systems, and components be tested following modification to assure satisfactory 'performance in service.
Contrary to the above, modifications performed in 1981-1982 designated as PC/M 80-51, PC/M 80-52, PC/M 80-167, and PC/M'0-168 were not tested under routine surveillance procedures were not tested until September 2,
1987.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to,the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Florida Power and Light Company is hereby required to submit to this Office within 30 days of the date of the, letter transmitting this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply including (for each violation):
(1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and'he results
- achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION QeBl+
Alan R. Herdt, Chief t
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this g~ day of October 1987 Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety 87 fp16p224 8 >000250 g7gPi3 PDR
@DOCK o PDR G