ML17340A819
| ML17340A819 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/02/1981 |
| From: | FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17340A817 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8103110719 | |
| Download: ML17340A819 (13) | |
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
TURKEY POINT UNITS 3
& 4 DOCKET NO.
50-250, 251 DADE COUNTY, PLORIDA 7-1-80 TO 12-31-80
TURKEY POINT:
Units 3
& 4 Environmental Radiolo ical Monitoxin (7&1-80 to 12-31-80) 1.
Introduction This report is submitted'n accordance with Turkey Point Plant Technical Specifications.
Environmental samples were collected and analyzed in conformance with the requirements of the Technical Specifications.
The minimum frequency of collection and analyses for specific radionuclides and sample types as required by these specifications has been met or exceeded ex'cept where samples were biologically unavailable.
2.
The Monitoxin Pro ram Period Covered:
This current report covers the period from July 1, 1980 to December 31, 1980.
Turkey Point Plant is carried out by the Dept. of Health and Rehabilitation Services of Florida (DHRS).
All samples are collected and analyzed by DHRS personnel.
Number of Sam les Anal zed:
A total of 110 results were reported from 706 samples collected at 35 different sampling locations during the period of this report.
TABLE 1 summarizes the mean and range values of these analyses.
S lit-Sam le Anal ses:
13 samples were collected for analysis by the DOE in accordance with the DHRS/DOE split-sampling program.
3.
Evaluation of Data a) Table 1 compares, where applicable, the analyses of media sampled at various locations with similar analyses of contxol location samples; shows the mean and range of similar analyses at, all sampling locations;'ists the location.with the highest values noted for the type of analysis made.
b) Where applicable, comparisons of test sample location data with-that of the control sample indicate no difference in concentration levels
,except,.as noted in Table 1.
c) Due to equipment failure, several fourth quarter tritium and strontium results are not yet available.
A supplement to this report will be submitted whe'n those results have been reported.
d) Higher than normal values-in Air Particulate Gross Beta samples were observed in -the fourth quarter.
This observation corresponds to the timing of a Chinese weapons test on October 16, 1980.
Increases were observed at all locations.
Similar observations were made in samples for the St. Lucie Plant Environmental Monitoring Program.
e)
Cs 137 and Sr 90 were detected in a broad leaf vegetation food crop substitute at location T-56 (5.2.2).
The values of radioactvity detected are within the expected range of activity for similar specimens throughout the state.
')
The higher than normal level of tritium activity observed at location T-91 on 7/31/80 is attributed to subsurface interchange with the Turkey Point Cooling Canal System.
The tritium observed in the cooling canal system (T-84) was also higher than typical but is within ranges which have. been previously reported.
g) All data have been analyzed and compared with previous data and are found to be consistent with values previously reported.
4.
Conclusions The concentration level of any radionuclide reported in TABLE 1 will contribute much less than the maximum permissible limits of individual or population group exposure that could result if there had been a continuous intake of radionuclides having concentration values equal to those permitted by APPENDIX B, TABLE II, 10-CFR-20.
Therefore, the operations of Turkey Point Plant Units 3
& 4 are not contributing harmful effects of irreversible damage to either the environment or to the health and safety of individuals or population groups in the regions surrounding Turkey Point Plant.
TABLE 1
ENVIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL HONITORIHG PROGRAII SINNNRY NAIIE OF FACILITYTurkey Point Units 3 and 4
DOCKET NO.
50-250.
251 LOCATION OF FACILITY Dade County, Florida, 9 miles East of FlaCityREPORTING PERIOD Jul 1
1980-December 21, 1980 Nedium or Pathway Sampled
>r er Unit Analysis for Number of.
Sites Samples Results Hean Range All Indicator Locations Sample Location Distance and Direction llean Range Location with Ni hest Nean Control Lo atio (')
Hean Range Huneker of Nonroutine Reported Neasurements 1.1 Air Particulate Ci/N 'ross p
8 211')
211
,041
.005-
.349 T-56, Princeton Sub-
.049
- station, (8 miles NNM)
.008-
.349
,040
.009-
.145 1.1A Air Iodines Ci/H 1311 8
207 207 NO(b)
NA(b) 1.2 Direct Radia-tion Rem/h 1313) 662) 4.5
'2.8-6.3 T-64, Hatoma Substation (22 miles N) 5.6 4.7-6.3 5.6 4.7-6.3 1.3 Precipitation pCi/L ross 8-OS 24 24 6.5 HD-22.3 T-64, Hatoma Substation 13.1 (22 miles H)
NO-22.3 13.1 ND-22.3 ross R-UDS Y Scan'4 24 16 )
HD NO ND )
NO ND ND ND HA NO NA
TADLE 1 ENVIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NOH ITORING PROGRAM SNNIARY LOCATIOH OF FACILITY REPDI111118 PER!DR Je'I 1
1988-Deceeber 21, 198D Hedium or Pathway Sampled Unit Analys is for Sites Samples Results 9'Iean Range All Indicator Number-of Locations Sample Location Distance and Direction IIean Location with Hi hest Hean Control Location( )
Hean Range Number of Honroutine Reported Neasurements 2.0 Surface Water 2.1.1 Estuarine pCi/L N
40K 89S" 90S Others 10 20 18 )
20 20 20 20 HD')
- 350 HD, 250-420 HA HA T-94, Pumpkin Key
( 8 miles SSE )
HA 380 ND 380-390 NA HA NA HA HA NA HA IIA NA HA 2.1.2 Cooling Canal pCi/L "S
90Sr Others 121)95 3670 430 ND 2.2
~ ND 2390-7800 380-480 HO-2.2 NA T-84, Cooling Canal Discharge, South of 8ridge ( 0 miles )
T-97, Loch Rosetta Onsite (0 miles)
NA T-84, Cooling Canal Discharge, Sduth of Bridge (0 miles) 4540 430 ND 2.2 27'IO>>
7800 380-460 NA ND-2.2 HA NA NA NA HA NA NA HA
TABLE I
'WIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRNI SUHINRY LOCATION OF FACILITY REPORIIRE PERIOD i~el I
1988-December 21, 198D Medium or Pathway Sampled
. Unit Analysis for Sites Number of Samples Results All Indicator Locations Range
- Control, I.ocationf -)
Sample Location Distance and Direction IIean Range Hean Range Location with Hi hest Hean Number of Honroutine Reported Measurement's 2.0 Surface Mater 2.1.3 Fresh Mater pCi/L 2.2 Potable Water pCi/L Mel1s ross 6-OS ross 6-UO ross ll-DS ross O'-UOS 12 12 12 s')
6 4) 146.4 HD 460 7.?
NO ND')
3e2 400 HA HD ')
720 4.2-HA T-75. Fla City Canal at Old Salinity Dam fl mile WiN)
T-75, Fla City Canal at Old Salinity Oam (1 mile MHM)
T-57, Oolans Farm (4 mlles NW) 290 460 ND 200-400 NA NA 300-720
>'IDLE 1
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL t10HITORING PROGRAM SINNNRY DIIIIE OF FACILITT e
Petet Oat te 2~gad
'OCKET IIO. 50-250 251 LOCATION OF FACILITY IIEPOIITIDG PEDIODJel I
1900-December 21, 1900 Iledium or Pathway Samoled Unit Analysis for Number of Sites Samples Results All Indicator Locations Mean Range Location with Hi hest Mean Sample Location Distance and Direction flean Range Control
'.ocation(
)
Hean Range Number of Honroutine Reported Measurements 2.0 Surface Mater 2.3 Ground Mater Mells Ci/L 40H 12 12 84) 350 1470 ND-450 730-3700 T-90, Mell E-20 (6 miles SSW)
T-91, Well GlOA (2 miles SW) 450 3700 HD-450 3700 NA 89Sr 905.
Others 12 12 12 HD HA ND HA ND HA
~ ND NA 3.0 Bottom Sedimen 3.1 Cooling Canal Ci/kg 226RA "Co 89Sr 90Sr Others 4) 34) 4 2500 190 HD ND ND 1250-3070 100-310 HA HA IA T-85, Disc)arge Canal West of 90 Ben'd (0 miles SM)
T-85, Disc)arge Canal Mest of 90 Bend (0 miles SM)
NA HA NA 2850 200 ND HD ND 2700-3000 100-310 NA NA HA HA HA NA NA HA HA HA HA
TABLE 1
ENVIRONHENTAL RADIOLOGICAL HONITORIHG PROGRNI SNUiARY OAIIE OF FACILITY AOYLO COCKET IIO. ~5-25 25 LOCATIOH OF FACILITY REPORTIHG PERIODg~~~IIY~mp 215 19&0 fledlum or Pathway Sampled Analysis for Sites Humber of Samples All Indicator Locations Results Hean Range Location with Hi hest Elean Sample Location Distance and Direction llean Range
~ Control Location( )
Hean Range Number of Honroutine Reported Measurements 3.0 Bottom Sediaxnt 3.2 Estuarine 4.0 Aquatic Biota 4.1 Crustacea (d)(e)
Ci/kg Ci/kg 226Ra 60Co 89Sr "Sr Others 40K 226Ra 137C 89S "Sr Others 6
4) 54) 460 HD ND HD 2300 1050 NO HD 380-580 HA HA NA NA 1500-2900 ND-1700 HA NA T-93, Pelican Bank (1.5 miles E)
HA HA HA HA T-95, Long Arsenicker Key, (4 miles SSE)
T-94, Pumpkin Key (8 miles SSE)
NA 580
'O ND HD 2900 1700 HA NA NA 2900 1700 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA.
'NA
TABLE 1
ENVIROHNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL tIOHITORIHG PROGRAtl SU(tttARY IIAIIE OF FACILITY Tel'keF Pet et Uet te 3 eed 5
DOCKET IIO.
EII525 251 LOCATION OF FACILITY Le
'e Hedium or Pathway Sampled 4.0 Aquatic Biota Unit Analysis for Humber of Sites Samples Resul ts tean Range All Indicator Locations Control'ocation(
)
Sample Location Distance and Direction llean Range Nean Range Location wi th Hi hest Nean Number of Honroutine Reported Heasurements 4.2.A Fish-CarnNcre pCi/kg (mixed Species 4.2.8 Fish-pCi/kg Herbivore (c 40K 226R 137C 89Sr 90S Others 40K 226R 89S~
"Sr Others 81 54) 4)
8 24) 4)
6 3400 380 160 ND NO HD 2600 480 tlD ND ND 2400-4100 ND-380 ND-160 HA HA HA 2500-2900 HD-620 NA HA ttA T-95, Long Arsenicker Key(4 miles SSE)
T-84, Cooling Canal Discharge, South of Bridge (0 miles)
T-84, Cooling Canal Discharge, South of Bridge, (0 miles)
N HA N
T-69, Caesar's Creek South End of Elliot Key (7 miles ESE)
T-94, Pumpkin Key (8 miles SSE)
N N
HA 4100 4100 HA 380 ND-380 160 HO-160 ND ND HD 620 620 ttA ND ttD HD 2900 2900 HA ttA ttA
~
I
~
~
TABLE 1
ENVIRONHENTAL RA010LOGICAL 110NITORIHG PROGRAH SUINARY IIAIIE OF FACILITY neke Pntnt Ontte 3 ~ed DOCKET t10.5~/~~
LOCATION OF FACILITY REPORTING PERIOD ul 980-December 21, 1980 Iledium or Pathway Samnled Unit Analysis for Number of-Sites Samples Results Hean Range All Indicator Locations Location with Hi hest Ilean Control
. Location Sample Location Distance and Direction llean Range I<can Range Number of Honroutine Reported Heasurements 4.0 Aquatic Biota 4.3.A Other-Turtle pCi/kg Grass 4.3.8 Other-Sponge pCi/kg 40K 226 60co 89Sr "Sr Others 6
6 4) 4)
6 880 ND ND HD ND HD 500-1300 N
HA HA HA N
T-59, Elliot Key N
HA N
HA HA 1300 ND ND ND ND HD 1300 HA HA N
NA HA HA HA N
HA HA HA 40'Co Others 1700 90 HD 1100-2000 ND-90 T-59, Elliott Key T-69, Caesar'st Creek South End of Elliott Ke (7 miles ESE)
T-86, Hest Arsenicker Key, Card Sound (3 miles SE)
\\
2000 90 ND 2000 NA 90 HA HA
TABLE 1
EHVIROQlEttTAL RADIOLOGICAL t'iOttITORlftG PROGRAH SUttttARY llAIIE OF FACILITTTIret~e'Olin Unite 3 a3OLE DOCKET IIO. gILErO EEL LOCATION OF FACILITY REPORTING PERIOD r 21, 1980 lledium or Pathway Sampled Unit Analysis for Sites Number of Samples All Indicator Locations Range Results
'ean Sample Location Distance and Direction tlean Range Location with Hi hest Hean Range Hean Control Location(
)
Hunker of Honroutine Reported Heasurements 5.0 Terrestial Biota 5.2.1 Small Arlrral 5.2.2 Food Crops pCi/kg pCi/kg 40K 226Ra 137C 89Sr "Sr Others 06) 6900 ND 120 ND 17 ND 6900 HA 120 N
17 T-52, Florida City Sub-station (7 miles W)
HA T-52, Florida City Sub-station (7 miles M)
NA T-52, Florida City Sub-station (7 miles M)
N ND 120 NA 120 ND 17 NA 17 ND NA 6900 6900 HA HA HA NA NA HA HA
TABLE 1
ENVIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL tlOHITORlttG PROGRAN SUNtARY HAtiE OF FACILITYTurke Point Units 3 and 4
DOCKET tt0. 50-250, 251 LOCATION OF FACILITY REPORTIHG PERIOD July 1, l980-December 21, 1980 tdedium or Pathway Sampled 5.0 Terrestial Biota Unit Analysis for Number of Si tes Sampl es Resul ts tiean Range All Indicator Locations Sample Location Distance and Direction tlean Range Location with tli hest Wean
~ Control Location Bean Range Humber of Honroutine Reported Heasurements 5.2.3 Mangrove Leaves 5.3 Soil Ci/kg Ci/kg 40K'26 137C 89S "Sr Others 226R 137C 895 90Sr Others 7
7 64) 4)
7 2500 340 HO ND ND HO 1760 220 HD HD ND 1900-4700 340 HA.
NA
'A HA 420-3600 ND-360 HA NA HA T.-58, Entrance, Road on Site (1 mile WSW) i
-64, ttatoma Substation 22 miles ttg NA NA HA T-56. Princeton Sub-station,(8miles NNW)
T-55, Silver Palm Drive (7 miles NHW)
T-56, Princeton Sub-station (8 miles NHW)
HA NA HA 4700 340 ND ND ND ND 3600 360 ND HD ND 4700 340 HA NA NA NA 3600 360 NA HA NA ttA HA NA HA NA NA NA HA HA ttA NA HA ND ND NO ND NA NA
- ttA 420 420
TABLE l EttVIROttHENTAL RADIOLOGICAL ll0ttITORING PROGRAll SUIMRY HAIIE OF FACILITY ts3ad MCKET ll0: 50-250 251 LOCATION OF FACILITY REPOllTIRO PERIODJO'I I
1980-December 21. 1980 lledium or Pathway Samoled Unit Analysis for Sites ttumber of Samples Results
'than Range All Indicator Locations Sample Location Distance and Direction Ilean Range Location with Hi hest Hean
~ Control Location(
)
Hean Range Number of ttonroutine Reported Heasurements NOTES I) Does not in
- 2) Average net 3
Hissing Dosi Result-base 4)
Some results
- 5) Sample at T-
- 6) Sample atte large local
- 7) <300 pCi/L
- 8) <200 pCi/L ude DO espons eter a
on one incomp 4 (8-2 ts uns eral c
Split Sam of two Do location Dosimeter ete at tim
-80) accid ccessful d
t populati les imeters
->0,(8-of rep ntal ly e to in n
4-80) rt iscarded erference by a a
b c
d e
T-HD Hu Bl Sh 4, ttatoma Non Detec let e Crab imp Substation able ttA*Hot Applicable