ML17340A819
| ML17340A819 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/02/1981 |
| From: | FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17340A817 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8103110719 | |
| Download: ML17340A819 (13) | |
Text
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 & 4 DOCKET NO. 50-250, 251 DADE COUNTY, PLORIDA 7-1-80 TO 12-31-80
TURKEY POINT: Units 3 & 4 Environmental Radiolo ical Monitoxin (7&1-80 to 12-31-80)
- 1. Introduction This report is submitted'n accordance with Turkey Point Plant Technical Specifications.
Environmental samples were collected and analyzed in conformance with the requirements of the Technical Specifications. The minimum frequency of collection and analyses for specific radionuclides and sample types as required by these specifications has been met or exceeded ex'cept where samples were biologically unavailable.
- 2. The Monitoxin Pro ram Period Covered: This current report covers the period from July 1, 1980 to December 31, 1980.
Turkey Point Plant is carried out by the Dept. of Health and Rehabilitation Services of Florida (DHRS). All samples are collected and analyzed by DHRS personnel.
Number of Sam les Anal zed: A total of 110 results were reported from 706 samples collected at 35 different sampling locations during the period of this report. TABLE 1 summarizes the mean and range values of these analyses.
S lit-Sam le Anal ses: 13 samples were collected for analysis by the DOE in accordance with the DHRS/DOE split-sampling program.
- 3. Evaluation of Data a) Table 1 compares, where applicable, the analyses of media sampled at various locations with similar analyses of contxol location samples; shows the mean and range of similar analyses at, all sampling locations;'ists the location. with the highest values noted for the type of analysis made.
b) Where applicable, comparisons of test sample location data with-that of the control sample indicate no difference in concentration levels
,except,.as noted in Table 1.
c) Due to equipment failure, several fourth quarter tritium and strontium results are not yet available. A supplement to this report will be submitted whe'n those results have been reported.
d) Higher than normal values-in Air Particulate Gross Beta samples were observed in -the fourth quarter. This observation corresponds to the timing of a Chinese weapons test on October 16, 1980. Increases were observed at all locations. Similar observations were made in samples for the St. Lucie Plant Environmental Monitoring Program.
e) Cs 137 and Sr 90 were detected in a broad leaf vegetation food crop substitute at location T-56 (5.2.2). The values of radioactvity detected are within the expected range of activity for similar specimens throughout the state.
')
The higher than normal level of tritium activity observed at location T-91 on 7/31/80 is attributed to subsurface interchange with the Turkey Point Cooling Canal System. The tritium observed in the cooling canal system (T-84) was also higher than typical but is within ranges which have. been previously reported.
g) All data have been analyzed and compared with previous data and are found to be consistent with values previously reported.
- 4. Conclusions The concentration level of any radionuclide reported in TABLE 1 will contribute much less than the maximum permissible limits of individual or population group exposure that could result if there had been a continuous intake of radionuclides having concentration values equal to those permitted by APPENDIX B, TABLE II, 10-CFR-20. Therefore, the operations of Turkey Point Plant Units 3 & 4 are not contributing harmful effects of irreversible damage to either the environment or to the health and safety of individuals or population groups in the regions surrounding Turkey Point Plant.
TABLE 1 ENVIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL HONITORIHG PROGRAII SINNNRY NAIIE OF FACILITY Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 . DOCKET NO. 50-250. 251 LOCATION OF FACILITY Dade County, Florida, 9 miles East of FlaCityREPORTING PERIOD Jul 1 1980-December 21, 1980 All Indicator Location with Ni hest Nean Control Huneker of Number of. Locations Sample Location Lo atio (') Nonroutine Nedium or Pathway Analysis Reported Sampled Unit for Sites Samples Results Hean Range Distance and Direction llean Range Hean Range Neasurements
>r er 1.1 Air Particulate Ci/N 'ross p 8 211') 211 ,041 .005- T-56, Princeton Sub- .049 .008- ,040 .009-
.349 station, (8 miles NNM) .349 .145 1.1A Air Iodines Ci/H 1311 8 207 207 NO(b) NA(b)
'4 1.2 Direct Radia- Rem/h 1313) 662) 4.5 '2.8- T-64, Hatoma Substation 5.6 4.7- 5.6 4.7-tion 6.3 (22 miles N) 6.3 6.3 1.3 Precipitation pCi/L 24 ross 8-OS 24 6.5 HD- T-64, Hatoma Substation 13.1 NO- 13.1 ND-22.3 (22 miles H) 22.3 22.3 ross R-UDS HD NO ND HA Y Scan 24 NO ND NO NA 16 ) ND
) ND
TADLE 1 ENVIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL NOH ITORING PROGRAM SNNIARY LOCAT IOH OF FACILITY REPDI111118 PER!DR Je'I 1 1988-Deceeber 21, 198D Location with Hi hest Hean Control Number of All Indicator Honroutine Number- of Locations Sample Location Location( )
Hedium or Pathway Analys is Reported Sampled Unit for Sites Samples Results 9'Iean Range Distance and Direction IIean Hean Range Neasurements 2.0 Surface Water 2.1.1 Estuarine pCi/L 10 20 18 ) HD') HA NA N
40K 20 350 250- T-94, Pumpkin Key 380 380- HA HA 420 ( 8 miles SSE ) 390 89S" 20 HD, HA HA ND NA NA 90S 20 HA IIA Others 20 HA NA HA 2.1.2 Cooling Canal pCi/L 121)95 3670 2390- T-84, Cooling Canal 4540 27'IO>> HA NA 7800 Discharge, South of 7800 8ridge ( 0 miles )
430 380- T-97, Loch Rosetta 430 380- NA NA 480 Onsite (0 miles) 460 "S ND NA ND NA HA NA 90Sr 2.2 HO- T-84, Cooling Canal 2.2 ND- NA HA 2.2 Discharge, Sduth of 2.2 Bridge (0 miles)
Others ~ ND NA
TABLE I
'WIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRNI SUHINRY LOCATION OF FACILITY REPORIIRE PERIOD i~el I 1988-December 21, 198D Location with Hi hest Hean - Control, Number of All Indicator Honroutine Number of Locations Sample Location I.ocationf -)
Medium or Pathway Analysis Reported Sampled . Unit for Sites Samples Results Range Distance and Direction IIean Range Hean Range Measurement's 2.0 Surface Mater 2.1.3 Fresh Mater pCi/L 12 ross 6-OS 12 146.4 3e2 T-75. Fla City Canal 290 200-400 at Old Salinity Dam 400 fl mile WiN) ross 6-UO 12 HD HA NA NA s') 460 HD
') T-75, Fla City Canal 460 300-720 at Old Salinity Oam 720 (1 mile MHM) 2.2 Potable Water pCi/L Mel1s ross ll-DS 7.? 4.2- T-57, Oolans Farm (4 mlles NW) ross O'-UOS 6 NO
- 4) ND') HA ND
>'IDLE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL t10HITORING PROGRAM SINNNRY DIIIIE OF FACILITT e Petet Oat te 2~gad 'OCKET IIO. 50-250 251 LOCATION OF FACILITY IIEPOIITIDG PEDIODJel I 1900-December 21, 1900 All Indicator Location with Hi hest Mean Control Number of Number of Locations Sample Location '.ocation( ) Honroutine Iledium or Pathway Analysis Reported Samoled . Uni t for Sites Samples Results Mean Range Distance and Direction flean Range Hean Range Measurements 2.0 Surface Mater 2.3 Ground Mater Ci/L 12 Mells 40H 12 350 ND- T-90, Mell E-20 450 HD- NA 450 (6 miles SSW) 450
- 84) 1470 730- T-91, Well GlOA 3700 3700 3700 (2 miles SW) 89Sr 12 HD HA HA 905. 12 ND HA NA Others 12 ND ~
ND 3.0 Bottom Sedimen 3.1 Cooling Canal Ci/kg 226RA 2500 1250- T-85, Disc)arge Canal 2850 2700-3070 West of 90 Ben'd 3000 (0 miles SM)
"Co 190 100- T-85, Disc)arge Canal 200 100- HA HA 310 Mest of 90 Bend 310 (0 miles SM) 89Sr 4) HD HA NA ND NA HA NA 90Sr 34) ND HA HA HD NA HA HA Others 4 ND IA NA ND HA NA HA
TABLE 1 ENVIRONHENTAL RADIOLOGICAL HONITORIHG PROGRNI SNUiARY OAIIE OF FACILITY AOYLO COCKET IIO. ~5-25 25 LOCATIOH OF FACILITY REPORTIHG PERIODg~~~IIY~mp 215 19&0 All Indicator Location with Hi hest Elean ~
Control Number of Humber of Locations Sample Location Location( ) Honroutine fledlum or Pathway Analysis Reported Sampled for Sites Samples Results Hean Range Distance and Direction llean Range Hean Range Measurements 3.0 Bottom Sediaxnt 3.2 Estuarine Ci/kg 226Ra 460 380- T-93, Pelican Bank 580 NA 580 (1.5 miles E)
'O 60Co HA HA 89Sr HD HA HA HA NA "Sr ND NA HA ND NA NA Others HD NA HA HD NA NA 4.0 Aquatic Biota 4.1 Crustacea Ci/kg (d)(e) 40K 2300 1500- T-95, Long Arsenicker 2900 2900 NA.
2900 Key, (4 miles SSE) 226Ra 1050 ND- T-94, Pumpkin Key 1700 1700 1700 (8 miles SSE) 137C 6 HA NA
- 4) NA 'NA 89S 54)
"Sr NO NA NA Others HD
TABLE 1 ENVIROHNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL tIOHITORIHG PROGRAtl SU(tttARY IIAIIE OF FACILITY Tel'keF Pet et Uet te 3 eed 5 DOCKET IIO. EII525 251
'e Le LOCATION OF FACILITY All Indicator Location wi th Hi hest Nean Number of Hedium or Pathway Analysis Humber of Locations Sample Location Control'ocation(
) Honroutine Reported Sampled Unit for Sites Samples Resul ts tean Range Distance and Direction llean Range Nean Range Heasurements 4.0 Aquatic Biota 4.2.A Fish-CarnNcre pCi/kg 81 (mixed Species 40K 3400 2400- T-95, Long Arsenicker 4100 4100 HA ttA 4100 Key(4 miles SSE) 226R 380 ND- T-84, Cooling Canal 380 ND-380 Discharge, South of 380 Bridge (0 miles) 137C 160 ND- T-84, Cooling Canal 160 HO-160 Discharge, South of 160 Bridge, (0 miles) 89Sr 54) ND HA N ND
- 4) HA 90S NO HA ND Others 8 HD HA N HD 4.2.8 Fish- pCi/kg Herbivore (c 40K 2600 2500- T-69, Caesar's Creek 2900 2900 HA 2900 South End of Elliot Key (7 miles ESE) 226R 480 HD- T-94, Pumpkin Key 620 620 ttA ttA 620 (8 miles SSE) 89S~ 24) tlD NA N ND 4)
"Sr ND HA N ttD Others 6 ND ttA HA HD I
~ -
~ ~
TABLE 1 ENVIRONHENTAL RA010LOGICAL 110NITORIHG PROGRAH SUINARY IIAIIE OF FACILITY neke Pntnt Ontte 3 ~ed DOCKET t10. 5~/~~
LOCATION OF FACILITY REPORTING PERIOD ul 980-December 21, 1980 Location with Hi hest Ilean Control Number of All Indicator . Honroutine Number of- Locations Sample Location Location Reported Iledium or Pathway Analysis Samnled Unit for Sites Samples Results Hean Range Distance and Direction llean Range I<can Range Heasurements 4.0 Aquatic Biota 4.3.A Other-Turtle pCi/kg Grass 880 500- T-59, Elliot Key 1300 1300 HA 40K 1300 226 6 ND N N ND HA HA 60co 6 ND HA HA ND HA N 89Sr
- 4) HD HA N ND N HA
- 4) NA HA "Sr ND HA HA ND Others 6 HD N HA HD HA HA 4.3.8 Other-Sponge pCi/kg 1700 1100- T-59, Elliott Key 2000 2000 NA 2000 T-69, Caesar'st Creek 40'Co South End of Elliott Ke (7 miles ESE) 90 ND- T-86, Hest Arsenicker 90 90 HA HA 90 Key, Card Sound (3 miles SE) \
Others HD ND
TABLE 1 EHVIROQlEttTAL RADIOLOGICAL t'iOttITORlftG PROGRAH SUttttARY llAIIE OF FACILITTTIret~e'Olin Unite 3 a3OLE DOCKET IIO. gILErO EEL LOCATION OF FACILITY REPORTING PERIOD r 21, 1980 All Indicator Location with Hi hest Hean Control Hunker of Location( ) Honroutine Number of Locations Sample Location Reported lledium or Pathway Analysis Sampled Unit for Sites Samples Results 'ean Range Distance and Direction tlean Range Hean Range Heasurements 5.0 Terrestial Biota 5.2.1 Small Arlrral pCi/kg 06) 5.2.2 Food Crops pCi/kg 40K 6900 6900 T-52, Florida City Sub- 6900 6900 HA NA station (7 miles W) 226Ra ND HA HA ND NA HA 137C 120 120 T-52, Florida City Sub- 120 120 HA station (7 miles M) 89Sr ND N NA ND NA HA "Sr 17 17 T-52, Florida City Sub- 17 17 HA station (7 miles M)
Others ND N ND NA NA
TABLE 1 ENVIRONNENTAL RADIOLOGICAL tlOHITORlttG PROGRAN SUNtARY HAtiE OF FACILITY Turke Point Units 3 and 4 DOCKET tt0. 50-250, 251 LOCATION OF FACILITY REPORTIHG PERIOD July 1, l980-December 21, 1980 All Indicator Location with tli hest Wean ~
Control Humber of Number of Locations Sample Location Location Honroutine tdedium or Pathway Analysis Reported Sampled Unit for Si tes Sampl es Resul ts tiean Range Distance and Direction tlean Range Bean Range Heasurements 5.0 Terrestial Biota 5.2.3 Mangrove Ci/kg Leaves 2500 1900- T.-58, Entrance, Road on 4700 4700 ttA . HA 40K'26 4700 Site (1 mile WSW)
-64, ttatoma Substation 137C 7
7 340 HO 340 HA.
i22 miles ttg 340 ND 340 HA NA HA HA HA 89S 64) ND NA NA ND NA NA ttA "Sr 4) ND 'A NA ND NA NA NA Others 7 HO HA HA ND NA NA HA 5.3 Soil Ci/kg 226R 1760 420- T-56. Princeton Sub- 3600 3600 420 420 3600 station,(8miles NNW) 137C 220 ND- T-55, Silver Palm Drive 360 360 ND 360 (7 miles NHW)
T-56, Princeton Sub-station (8 miles NHW) 895 HD HA HA ND NA ND NA 90Sr HD NA NA HD HA NO NA Others ND HA HA ND NA ND - ttA
TABLE l EttVIROttHENTAL RADIOLOGICAL ll0ttITORING PROGRAll SUIMRY HAIIE OF FACILITY ts3ad MCKET ll0: 50-250 251 LOCATION OF FACILITY REPOllTIRO PERIODJO'I I 1980-December 21. 1980 All Indicator Location with Hi hest Hean ~
Control Number of lledium or Pathway ttumber of Locations Sample Location Location( ) ttonroutine Analysis Reported Samoled Uni t for Sites Samples Results 'than Range Distance and Direction Ilean Range Hean Range Heasurements NOTES I) Does not in ude DO Split Sam les a T- 4, ttatoma Substation
- 2) Average net espons of two Do imeters b HD Non Detec able ttA*Hot Applicable 3 Hissing Dosi eter a location ->0,(8- 4-80) c Hu let Result- base on one Dosimeter d Bl e Crab
- 4) Some results incomp ete at tim of rep rt e Sh imp
- 5) Sample at T- 4 (8-2 -80) accid ntal ly iscarded
- 6) Sample atte ts uns ccessful d e to in erference by a large local eral c t populati n
- 7) <300 pCi/L
- 8) <200 pCi/L