ML17340A646
| ML17340A646 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 01/21/1981 |
| From: | Heinemann J FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION |
| To: | Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 8101121, NUDOCS 8101290452 | |
| Download: ML17340A646 (4) | |
Text
REGULATORY ORNATION DISTRISUTION SYSl (RIDS)
-CESSION NBR>8101290052.
DOC.DATE~ 81/01/21 NOTARIZED> NO,,
DOCKET.'
FACIL'.50 250 Turkey Point Plant'i Unit 3i Flat ida Power and Light C
05000250 50 251 Turkey Point>> P)anti Unit 4i Florida Poweri and Light C
05000251 AUTH',NAME, AUTHOR AF F ILIATION HEINEMANNiJ,M ~
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission RECIP ~ NAMEl RECIPIENT AFFILIATION VARGApS ~ AD Operating, Reactors" Branch-1
SUBJECT:
-'omments on DKS'e. steam~ genet atorIr epairtper NRC 8012'48 r equest.Nosignigicant>>
impacts to electr ic powerinatur al gas>>
or o i l pipeline.'ndus tr ies, DISTRIBUTION CODE)
COOPS COPIES" RECK'ED 5 L'iTR ENCL'
'IZE'"
TITLE: Knviron.
Comments+
NOTES'.
RECIPIENT'D CODE/NAME)
ACT'ION ~ 'ARGAg 8 ~
1 7 COPIES LTTR ENCL 7
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME'ROTKNHUI S i M 05 COPIES'TTR:"ENCL>
1 8
INTERNAL: ACCIDNT'VAL BRi ENV ENG BR 09 HYDRO GEO, BR NRC PDR 02'AD'SSESSMT'R)
SITl ANAL" BR 10, 1
1 1
1 EF TREAT SYS HYD/GKO BR ILE 0
GU ILE NCE BR 07 01 BR 1
1 1
1 1
EXTERNALS ACRS NATL LAB 20.
1 5
LPDR>>
NSICI 03 04 1
JAN 30 ]SSi
,TOTAL'UMBER< OF COPIES'KQUIRFDO LTTR 29 ENCL>>
0 l
h t
1
)
v I
N 1
~ ~
y II p' V
t s,
7
~
II II 1/
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON 20426
~)
~em C~Cl L ~II Lal I CD, CY
.=-C>".L January 21, 1981 IN REPLY REFER TO:
Mr. Steven A. Varga Chief, Operating Reactors Branch Sl Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Mr. Varga:
I am replying to your request of December 18, 1980 to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement related to steam generator repair
't the Turkey Point Plant Units 3 and 4.
This Draft EIS has been reviewed by appropriate FERC staff components upon whose evaluation this response is based.
This staff concentrates its review of other agencies'n-vironmental impact statements basically on those areas of the electric power, natural gas, and oil pipeline industries for which the Commission has jurisdiction by law, or where staff has special expertise in evaluating environmental impacts in-voled with the proposed action. It does not appear that there would be any significant impacts in these areas of concern nor serious conflicts with this agency's responsibilities should this action be undertaken.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this statement.
Sincerely, a
M. Heinemann Advisor on Environmental Quality
I