ML17340A559

Proposed Environ Tech Spec Table 4.12-1,Sheet 1.Util Safety Evaluation & Sampling Location Map Encl

ML17340A559
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	12/31/1980
From:	FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17340A558	List: ML17340A557 ML17340A559
References
NUDOCS 8101060311
Download: ML17340A559 (8)

Text

C M TABLE 4.12 SHEET 1

}eat OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE, PROGRAM (1)

CO Cb Collection Criteria and Sam lin Locations Fre uenc 2 Analysis/Countin 1 AIR

l. 1 Particulate and Iodine Comparison of on-site versus off-site Weekly Gross Beta 8 reference locations Gamma spectral analysis 3 locations on-site in prevailing wind of monthly composite directions from plant T58, T71, T72 locations off-site within a radius of 10 if indicated by high 4 beta activity miles of plant in prevailing wind Radioactive Iodine directions from the plant T51, T52, T56, T57 1 location for reference 22 miles north of plant site T64 1.2 Direct Radiation Comparison of on-site versus off-site Monthly Determine direct radiation

& refer'ence locations exposure by TLD readout Sampling locations same as 1.1, plus off-site on North Key Largo T70 1.3 Preci pitation (3) Comparison of on-site versus off-site Monthly Gross beta 8 reference locations Gamma spectral analysis (4) 1 location on-site T72 Tritium (4) 1 location for reference 22 miles north of plant site T64 2 locations off-site within a radius of 10 miles of plant in prevailing wind directions from the plant T52, T57

2. MATER 2.1 Surface Water 2.1.1 Estuarine 5 locations - Biscayne Bay T51, T67, T69, quarterly Gamma spectral analysis T71, T93 Tritium 5 locations - Card South T66, T81, T86, Sr-89 8 90 (if detected T94, T95 in 2.1.2

~ ~

location - Lake Warren T84 Monthly aqmo spectral analysis 2.1.2 Cooling Canal System 1 rltium 1 location - Loch Rosetta T97 Sr-89 & 90 12-31-80

0 0 SAFETY EVALUATION Re: Turkey Point Units 3 8 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 8 50-251 Proposed License Amendment Environmental Surveillance Pro ram I. Introduction This evaluation supports a basically administrative change in Technical Specification Table 4. 12-1, which lists various environmental surveillance requirements. Precipitation sample location T79 is changed to location T72.

II. Evaluation Item 1.3 of the Table lists four locations on and around the Turkey Point site that are used by the State of Florida as collection points for precipitation samples. One of the locations is on the plant site and the other three locations are several miles distant from the plant site.

Table 4. 12-1, Sheet 1 presently lists T79 as the on-site precipitation sampling location (see Technical Specification Figure 4.12-1 attached for information). This location is near the site boundary station along the entrance road into the plant. In February and March of this year, the precipitation sample at location T79 was unusable due to motor oil contamination. The sampling drum is easily accessible from the entrance road, and used motor. oil was apparently introduced into the drum by a person or persons unknown.

Since the site boundary station is unmanned, and since the entrance road adjacent to location T79 is heavily travelled, it was decided to relocate the preci pitation sampling drum to location T72. The new location is on-site, and, as shown on Figure 4.12-1, it is relatively near the old location (approximately 1 mile distant). Access to location T72 is also controlled through a manned security gate.

The change in sample location is necessary to ensure the capability of obtaining reliable monthly .precipitation samples from an on-site location. With respect to rainfall, there is no significant difference between locations T79 and T72, and relocation to T72 does not have any safety implications.

III. Conclusion We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:

(1) the amendment does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of accidents previously considered and does not involve a significant decrease in a safety margin, (2) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (3) such activities will be conducted in ccmpliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.

12-31-80

'l 55$

~ RJ g55$8RRf~ 'p Nl

~

~

~

~ ~

R jg~ ~

)

,III>

pWg~

ysrm g~r FiC PS ~ ~

,/

o g'

0 4 ~

0 I

I

~ ~

o

~ ~ ~

C ol

~ ia 0

~

ig 1

STATE OF FLORIDA ')

) ss ~

COUNTY OF DADE. )

R. E'. Uhri ','eing first duly sworn, deposes and says:

That he'"isa'i'ce'resi'den't'ight of Florida Power &

Company, the licensee herein; I

That he has executed the foregoing document; that the state-ments made in this said document, are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief, and that he is authorized to execute the document on behalf of said licensee.

R. E. Uhra.g Subscribed and sworn to before this E)~ me NOTARY PUBLIC, z.n and for the County of Dade, State of Florida ROTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIOA ct LA~

hIT COMMISSIOM EXPIRES AUOUST 24, ISSl Nj'ommiss'ion expires:, '

~ ., ' BOHOEO. THRU .LIAT/WlO QOIIOIiIIl hgEIIOY~

C-i+i' ~ )g