ML17339B221
| ML17339B221 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 07/16/1980 |
| From: | Grotenhuis M Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8007300567 | |
| Download: ML17339B221 (10) | |
Text
gy,S Rgg~
c,"
0~s
+W*y+
Docket No.'0-250 251 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D, C. 20555 UIV I e
@g~)Pggt Mf(~D ~II.f. MP't LICENSEE:
Florida Power 8 Light Company FACILITY:
Turkey Point Plant Unit Nos.
3 It 4
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF MEETING HELD ON JUNE 30, 1980 TO BRIEF ALL REVIEWERS ON THE STEAM GENERATOR REPAIR PROGRAM (TAC NOS. 12995,
- 12996, 13082,
- 13083, 11989, AND 11990)
BACKGROUND On June 2, 1980 a memorandum was sent to all AD's having reviewers that would be involved in the Turkey Point Steam Generator Repair Program (Attachment 1).
On June 20, 1980 this meeting was called to brief all reviewers on the program
Attendees are listed in Attachment 2.
MEETING
SUMMARY
M. Grotenhuis, Project Manager for the Tur key Point Plant, presented an over-view of the'hronology of events (as listed in Attachment 1).
After that, the following additional and/or changed items were discussed:
1.
Demineralizers were added; 2.
Changes in cutting the generator steam were made; 3.
Changes were made in occupational doses; and 4.
Changes were made in the steam generator storage building.
The review requirements were then listed as follows:
1.
Complete review for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, August 4, 1980 (TAC Nos.
12995 and 12996).
2.
Complete the update of the Safety Evaluation dated May 14, 1980 by August 4, 1980 (TAC Nos.
11082 and 11083).
3.
Prepare for hearing in December 1980 (TAC Nos.
11989 and 11990).
Background information was issued to all reviewers present who did not already have it.
fSSOV50'/7 h
JULY I c 1980 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The above information was discussed and all agreed to the August 4, 1980 deadline for review material to be submitted to the project manager.
The RAB found that a site visit would be necessary and questions would be asked of the licensee.
The site visit was tentatively scheduled for July 10 and 11, 1980 with questions to be forwarded to the utility one week in advance.
Based on the deadline of August 4, 1980 being met by all reviewers,'r.
Goldberg will notify the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (and updated safety evaluation) will be issued on or about September 1, 1980.
Marshall Grote'nhuis, Project Manager Operating Reactors Branch 81 Division of Licensing Attachments:
As stated c" w/attachments:
See next page
~
~
K Il.NÃfMNi7i lII.< MiW.
Meeting Summary for Turkey Point 3 5 4 Docket Files D~'+~
Local PDR NSIC TERA ORBl Reading NRR Reading H. Denton E. Case D. Eisenhut R. Purple T. Novak R. Tedesco G. Lainas G. Zech S. Varga T. Ippolito R. Clark R. Reid B. J. Youngblood A. Schwencer J. Miller D. Crutchfield J.
Wetmore Project Manager OELD OSD (3)
S.
- Showe, IKE C. Parrish R. Fraley, ACRS (16)
Principal Staff Participants Licensee Short Service List JULY 1
6 880
~pa RCgt
%p0
~+i c
'4~a 0
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON. O. C. 20555 2
1S80 M-"MQRANDUM FOR:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
James Knight, Division of Engineering Vincent Noonan, Division of Engineering Daniel Muller, Division of Engineering Paul Check, Division of Systems Integration Milliam Kreger, Division of Systems Integration Lester Rubenstein, Division of Systems Integration Thomas M. Novak, Assistant Director for Operating Reactors TURKEY POINT STEAM GENERATOR REPAIR:
PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT APPRAISAL (EIA) AND PREPARATION FOR HEARING (TACS 12995/6 AND 13082/3}
Backaround:
Florida Power and Light Company (FPL) has subnitted a Steam Generator Repair Report which describes the repair program proposed for the Turkey Point Plant Unit Nos.
3 and 4.
A petitioner has requested a hearing and has been admit.ed as an intervenor.
Before a hearing could be held, the Commission ordered the staff to prepare an EIS for the Surry Plant, which is undergoing a similar repair program.
Consequently, the staff decided that an EIS should
, also be prepared for tho Turkey Point repair program.
A more detailed chronology of these events is given in Attachment l.
Consistent with the chronology in Attacfment 1
a schedule was prepared which would have led to the issuance of a Draft EIS on May 15, 1980.
The presently prooosed target date for the Draft EIS is July 1, 1980.
The hearing is being held in abeyance until the final EIS is issued.
Florida Pow'er and Light is expected to issue a schedule calling for installation of the new steam gener-ator in 1981, probably in late summer.
The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is waiting to get a schedule from the staff for the preparation of the EIS.
If a Draft EIS is issued on July 1, 1 980, the final EIS could be issued by October 1, 1980.
This would likely permit a hearing to begin in January of 1981.
Reauest:
Reviewers are needed to update the EIA and convert it to an EIS and to update the SE.
In addition to the information already in the EIA and the SE, new information has been submitted by Florida Power and Light Company which updates the Steam Generator Repair Report.
As a guide to the assignment of r viewers that are needed for these activities, see Attachment 2; a list of witnesses, the subjects on which they were to testify, and the branches to
which they were assigned, and Attachment 3; the table of contents of the SE, the authors o,
each section and the branches to which they were assigned.
In addition, the subject of endangered species has been brought up and since it has not been discussed in the Turkey Point OL FES, it should be discussed in this EIS.
Further guidance in the preparation of the EIA is available in the form of responses to interrogatories which arose from the'earing.
These and all other documents listed in Attachment 4 will be available from Mr. Grotenhuis (27128).
These TACS have been identified as priority 1 items for Turkey Point.
Enclo sures:
Attachment 1 Chronology Attactment 2 Witnesses Attachment 3
SE Peviewers Attaciment 4 References Thomas M. Hovak, Assistant Director for Operating Reactors Division of Licensing
Attachment 1
TURKEY POINT STEAM GENERATOR REPAIR PROGRAM CHRONOLOGY Sep ember 20, 1977 May 14, 1979 June 29, 1979 August 3, 1979 September 25, 1979 October ll, 1979 November 15, 1979 March 4, 1980 March 6, 1980 March 12, 1980 March 18, 1980 March 28, 1980 April 8, 1980
- July 1, 1980
- Sep ember 1, 1980
- October 1, 1980
- November 1, 1980
- Oates estimated for planning purposes Steam Generator Repair Report Submitted Safety Evaluation Issued Environmental Impact Appraisal Issued Mark P Oncavage accepted as a
petitioner Acceptable Contentions indicated and a Hearing is scheduled for January 8, 1980 Order Requesting Additional Information Hearing date cancelled Commission Memorandum and Order issued to require EIS on the Surry 1
Repair.
ASLB notified that an EIS would be prepared for the Turkey Point SG Repair TAC Nos.
12995 and 12996 issued for preparation of a Graft EIS Additional informati'on received from our demineralizer and storage building Revision 7 to SG Repair Report subni tted TAC Nos.
13082 and 13083 issued for update of SE Oraft EIS issued for comment End of comment period Final EIS issued Prepare testimony for hearing
a e,aa >aug(
0
. ~ 0
>> +~~~c UNiTED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMlSSION WASHINGTON, O. C. 20555 aIQVg ae>>
R
~
s5 >g Attachment 2
l'OTE TO:
Steve Goldberg FROM:
Marshall Grotenhuis
SUBJECT:
TURKEY POENT STEAM GEttERATOR REPAIR PROGRAM The witnesses assigned to 1.
Environmental Empact 2.
Indus. rial Exposure ALARA the -referenced'i oceeding are Branch Statement
~ ORB-1 as fol'lows:
Witness M.
Gr otenhuis R.
Emch 3.
Liquid Effluen s During Repair Appendix I 4.
Combined with 3 Combined with 2 6.
Releases for Stored Assemblies Structural Aspects
- 5. Corrosion Meteorol ogy and Hydrology Radioactivity in the Environment 7.
Qemin eral izer Costs Demineral izer Effluents - Chemical
~ Demineral izer Effluents - Radiological 8.
¹jected S.
Comulative Offsite Radioactive Releases 10.
Falls within 1
ll.
SGRR Cost Benefit is Inadequate a.
Rejected b.
Replacement Pow r Costs c.
Rejected d.
Land Commi ments e.
Demineralizer Cos.s and Condenser Retubi ng Costs Cost Update from December 1977 EEB EB HMB RAB CBAB
'SB EEB EEB CBAB CBAB CBAB CBAB R.
Emch
- a. A>sp/>
R.
Emch B.
D. Liaw M. Bivins F.
Congel J. Roberts J. Wilson R.
Emch R.
Emch J.
Roberts J.
Roberts J.
Roberts J.
Roberts
S.eve Goldberg 12.
Falls within 2 13.
Radiation Honitoring During Repair 14.
Fire Protection During Repair EEB PSB R.
Emch E. Sylvester Only the witnesses
-,or contention 2 for. ALARA (se Order dated August 3, 1 979, pages 43 through 46) and for contention 3 Appendix I (see Order da-.ed August 3, 1979 page
- 50) are still needed.
These will be done by
==""" or by OSE through Er.B request.
In addition, the Board has asked the staff to address in greater detail the problem of assessing the continuing integrity of the radioac.ive re:ention barriers (Order dated October 11, 1979).
(See memo A. Schwencer o
G.
Lainas and Y.
Noonan dated October 24, 1979.)
Answers to the questions have been requested
-,rom PSB and EB.
This could requir e additional witnesses depending upon the form and content of the answers.
r Marshall Grotenhuis, Project Nanager Opera.ing Reactors Branch
==1, DOR cc:
G.
Kni9hto n Y.
Hoonan G.
Lear G.
Lainas
Attachment 3
Section Title TABLE OF CONTENTS
~Pa e
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 History. of Steam Generator Operation'.2 Reasons for Steam Generator Repair 1-1l-l 1"3 g pQ~~h 2.0 OESCRIPTIOH OF REPAIRED STEAM GENERATOR 2.1 Mechanical Design and Material Changes 2.2 Heat Treatment of Tubing 2.3 ASME Code and Regulatory Guide Implementation 2.4 Removal and Reinstallation Operation l si9 2.5 Post Instal 1 ation Testing 58 2e6 Radiological Considerations zgB 2.6. 1 Occupational Radiation Exposure
'.6.2 Radioactive Waste Treatment
- 2. 6. 3 Airborne Radioactive Releases 2.6.4 Liquid Maste
- 2. 6. 5 Solid Haste
- 2. 6.6 Disposal of Steam Generator Lower Assemblies 2.7 guality Assurance ps8 2-1 2
1 l 11-~g+6-C 2-2 2"2 2-2 c
C~c- <+<<
2-4 cw 2-5 2-11 2-11 2-12 2-13 2" 14 2-16 3.0 EVALUATION 3.1 Fffects of Steam Generator Design Changes 3.2 Effects of Repair Activities 3.2. 1 Protection of Safety Related Equipment 3.2.2 Other Interactions with Operating Unit 3.2.3 Fire Protection 3.3 Transient and Accident Analysis 3.3.1 Discussion 3.3.2 Non-LOCA Accidents and Transients 3.3.3 Loss of Coolant Accidents (LOCA) 3.3.4 Steam Generator Tube Rupture 3.3.5 Summary 6'r9 Psst RS 3"1 3-1 3"2 3-2 3"4 3-7 3"8 3-8 3-11 3-13 3" 14 3-14 c.W~~
~u,m rt<
4.0 5.0 3.4 Radiological Consequences of Postulated Accidents 3.4.
1 Accidents During Operation with the Repaired Steam Generator 3.4.2 Accidents During the Repair Effort 3.5 Special License Conditions and Technical Specifications 3.6 Security CONCLUSION REFERENCES 3-14 3-14 3-15 3-17 3" 17 4" 1 5-1 Cu8 ><~+
g ~ pcYK
REFERENCES Attachment 4
1.
Steam Generator Repair Report Revision 1-7 2.
Safety Evaluation 3.
Environmental Impact Appraisal 4.
Order Ruling on the Petition of Mark P Oncavage 5.
Order Relative to Contentions and Discovery 6.
Order Requesting Additional Information 7.
Intervenors Answers to Staff Interrogatories, etc.
8.
Licensees Responses and Objectives, etc.
9.
Licensees Supplemental Responses, etc.
10.
Answers to Interrogatori es (Intervenor ), etc.
11.
Licensees Suppl cmental Responses 12.
Memorandum and Order (Surry) 13.
Letters to the ASLB
. 14.
Motion to Amend Contentions 15.
FPL Response to RAI December 1977 May 14, 1979 June 29, 1979 August 3, 1979 September 25, 1979 October ll, 1979 December 17, 1979 December 17, 1979 January 31, 1980 February 5, 1980 February ll, 1980 March 4, 1980 March 6, 1980 March ll, 1980 March 18, 1980