ML17333A774

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 970123 & 27 Telcon RAI Re Proposed TS Changes Supported by Analyses to Increase Unit 1 SG Tube Plugging Limit & Certain Proposed Changes for Unit 2 Supported by Related Analyses
ML17333A774
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 02/06/1997
From: Fitzpatrick E
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER CO., INC.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
AEP:NRC:1207C, NUDOCS 9702120287
Download: ML17333A774 (7)


Text

CATEGORY 1 REGULAT INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION STEM (RIDS)

~ L ACCESSiON NBR:9702120287

'OC.DATE: 97/02/06 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET I FACIL:59-315 Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana M

05000315 50-316 Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana M

05000316 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFIL'IATION FITZPATRICK,E.E American Electric Power Co., Inc.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Responds to 970123

& 27 telcon RAI re proposed TS changes supported by analyses to increase Unit 1 SG tube plugging limit 6 certain proposed changes for Unit 2 supported by related analyses.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

A001D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: OR Submittal: General Distribution NOTES:

E INTER RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-3 LA HIC J

FTDE CENTER EÃCB NRR/DSSA/SPLB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT COPIES LTTR ENCL RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-3 PD NRR/DE/ECGB/A NRR/DRCH/HICB NRR/DSSA/SRXB OGC/HDS2 COPIES LTTR ENCL EXTERNAL: NOAC NRC PDR D

N NOTE TO ALL "RIDSU RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE'ONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESKI ROOM OWFN SD-5(EXT. 415-2083)

TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR 13 ENCL

4'

'I

Indiana Michigan~

Power Company 500 Circle Drive Buchanan, Ml 491071395 R

INOIAiM NICMSAM IrOMfM February 6,

1997 Docket Nos.

50-315 50-316 AEP: NRC: 1207C U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.

C.

20555 Gentlemen:

DONALD C.

COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNZTS 1 AND 2 PROPOSED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES SUPPORTED BY ANALYSES TO INCREASE UNIT 1 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE PLUGGING LIMIT AND CERTAIN PROPOSED CHANGES FOR UNIT 2 SUPPORTED BY RELATED ANALYSES REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL ZNFORMATION

References:

Letter AEP:NRC:1207, Donald C. Cook Nuclear'Plant units 1 and 2

license nos.

DPR-58 and DPR-74,-

"Proposed Technical Specification Changes Supported by Analyses to Increase Unit 1 Steam Generator Tube Plugging Limit and Certain Proposed Changes'or 'nit 2

Supported by Related Analyses,"

E.

E. Fitzpatrick to USNRC Document Control

Desk, May 26, 1995.

Letter AEP:NRC:1207A, Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Plant units 1

and 2 license nos.

DPR-58 and DPR-74, "Clarification of Power Shape Used in LOCA Analysis,"

E.

E. Fitzpatrick to USNRC Document Control Desk, September 26, 1995.

Westinghouse Letter NTD-NRC-95-4518, Withdrawal of WCAP-12909-P on Power Shape Sensitivity Model (PSSM),

N. J. Liparulo to USNRC Document Control

Desk, August 7, 1995.

Letter AEP:NRC:1118J, Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Plant units 1

and 2

"Report of LOCA Evaluation Model Changes,"

E.

E. Fitzpatrick to USNRC Document Control

Desk, September 18, 1995.

Letter AEP:NRC:1223, Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant units 1 and 2 license nos.

DPR-58 and DPR-74, "Proposed License and Technical Specification Changes Supported by Analyses to Increase Unit 2

Rated Thermal Power and Certain Proposed Changes for Unit 1

Supported by Related Analyses,"

E.

E. Fitzpatrick to USNRC Document Control

Desk, July 11, 1996.

Westinghouse Letter NTD-NRC-95-4477, Transmittal of Topical Reports WCAP-14404-P and WCAP-14405-NP, "Methodology for Incorporating Hot Leg Nozzle Gaps into BASH", N. J. Liparulo to USNRC Document Control Desk, July 26, 1995.

q7O2lgo287 9702o PDR ADQCK 0 P

T'I

'V

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2

AEP: NRC: 1207C August 29,

1995, NRC minutes from a

meeting between Westinghouse Electric Corp.,Tennessee Valley Authority, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on August 10, 1995.

This letter responds to staff concerns and a request for action that were expressed in telephone conferences on January 23 and 27, 1997.

In those conversations, the staff voiced some concern that the unit 1 large break loss of cooling accident (LBLOCA) analysis of reference 1,

as supplemented by reference 2,

depends on an unapproved model to ensure that the chopped cosine power distribution case remains limiting.

References 1 and 2 were submitted in support of our proposal to increase the allowable unit 1 steam generator tube plugging limit to 30%.

The staff indicated the submittal did not specify a proposed schedule for providing reanalysis or taking other action as may be needed to show compliance with 550.46 requirements.

In responding to these

issues, the following information is offered.

In the summer of 1995, via reference 3, Westinghouse withdrew from staff review its proposed power shape sensitivity model (PSSM) for addressing the range of power distribution factors as required by 10 CFR 50, appendix K.

The adoption of a methodology called ESHAPE resulted in a penalty for some analyses.

In particular, the current analyses of record for both units of Cook Nuclear Plant were affected.

Our 10 CFR 50.46 report on this matter was prepared and submitted as reference 4.

In response to the requirement in the code to propose a schedule for reanalysis, we noted those new unit 1

LOCA analyses, contained in reference 1,

were before the staff for review and that new analyses were planned for a submittal to support power uprate for unit 2.

Reference 5 is the unit 2

submittal.

To ensure the chopped cosine remained limiting for the unit 1

submittal, reference 1, credit was taken for application of an unapproved model to skewed power distribution cases.

The unapproved model was the hot leg nozzle gap model, reference 6.

This approach was described in reference 2.

At the time reference 2

was submitted, we believed the use of an unapproved model to ensure the chopped cosine case remained limiting was acceptable to the staff.

Our belief rested on the understanding that the hot leg nozzle gap model would be reviewed in the fiscal year 1996 (reference 7),

, During our discussions on January 23 and 27, 1997, the staff revealed they now do not expect to be able to review or approve the hot leg nozzle gap model of reference 6 in the near future.

The staff indicated they would accept the analyses submitted in references 1 and 2 as a temporary evaluation in support of an increase in unit 1 steam generator tube plugging to 30%, if we would commit to schedule a revision of the unit 1 LBLOCA analysis or plant configuration so that only approved models are relied upon.

We are currently discussing this issue with Westinghouse to identify feasible options to resolve it.

Although we have not yet identified the best solution, we believe a revised submittal with an approved evaluation model can be made prior to the start up of cycle 18.

Cycle 18 is currently scheduled to begin on April 20, 2000. If our discussions with Westinghouse should result in a need to change our proposed schedule, a submittal to the staff describing the change will be made.

~

~

I tO U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 3

AEP: NRC: 1207C For your information, we note that the LBLOCA analyses described in the unit 2 uprate submittal, reference 5,

are based entirely on approved models.

Sincerely, Vice President CC:

A. A. Blind A. B. Beach MDEQ -

DW 6c RPD NRC Resident Inspector J.

R. Padgett

4 a'r.

f t

0 h

II C

II V

8

'I E

C