ML17333A302
| ML17333A302 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 02/08/1996 |
| From: | Kropp W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Fitzpatrick E INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17333A303 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9602200317 | |
| Download: ML17333A302 (8) | |
See also: IR 05000315/1995013
Text
CATEGORY 2
+IV
NOTES:
REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
'v
-ACCESSION NBR:9602200317
DOC.DATE: 96/02/08
NOTARIZED: NO
DOCKET
g.
ACIL:50-315 Donald C.
Cook Nuclear
Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana
M
05000315
50-316 Donald C.
Cook Nuclear
Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana
M
05000316
AUTH.NAME
AUTHOR AFFILIATION
KROPP,H.J.
Region
3 (Post
820201)
RECIP.NAME
RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
FITZPATRI"K,E.
Indiana Micnigan Power
Co. (formerly Indiana
& Michigan Ele
SUBJECT:
Forwards
insp repts
50-315/95-13
6 50-316/95-13
on 951205-
960116
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
IE01D
COPIES
RECEIVED:LTR
ENCL
SIZE:
TITLE: General
(50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response
RECIPIENT
ID CODE/NAME
PD3-1
INTERNAL: AEOD/DEIB
AEOD/TTC
PX53.
CENTER
CH HHFB
NRR/DRPM/PERB
OE DIR
RGN3
FILE
01
~i
ERNAL: LITCO BRYCE,J
H
NRC
'I
COPIES
LTTR ENCL
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
'1
1
1
1
1
1
RECIPIENT
ID CODE/NAME
HICKMAN,J
AEOD/SPD/RAB
DEDRO
NRR/DISP/PIPB
NRR/DRPM/PECB
NUDOCS-ABSTRACT
OGC/HDS2
NOAC
COPIES
LTTR ENCL
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE!
CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK,
ROOM OWFN SD-5(EXT. 415-2083)
TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM
DISTRIBUTION LISTS
FOR
DOCUMENTS YOU DON AT NEEDI
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES
REQUIRED:
LTTR
18
ENCL
18
February 8,
1996
,8
Mr. E.
E. Fitzpatrick
Senior Vice President
Nuclear Generati'on
Company.
1 Riverside
Plaza
Columbus,
OH
43216
SUBJECT:
INTEGRATED INSPECTION
REPORT 50-315/316-95013 (DRP)
AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION-
Dear Mr. Fitzpatrick:
This refers to the routine safety inspection
conducted
by Messrs.
B. Bartlett,
D. Hartland,
C. Orsini,
R. Paul,
B. Fuller,
and
N. Shah of this office from
December
5,
1995,
through January
16,
1996.
The inspection
included
a review
of activities at your Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Plant,
Units
1 and 2.
At the conclusion of the inspection,
the findings were discussed
with those
members of your staff identified in the enclosed report.
Based
on the results of this inspection,
the
NRC has determined that two
violations of NRC requirements
occurred.
The violations are cited in the
enclosed
Notice of Violation (Notice)
and the circumstances'surrounding
them
are described
in detail in the subject inspection report.
The violations are
of concern
because
in one case
a Technical Specification requirement for. the
diesel
generators
was not properly implemented,
and in the other case there
was
a failure to test safety-related
equipment
under conditions
assumed
in
design basis
documents.
We are concerned
that during this inspection there were several
issues
identified which pertained to implementation of technical specification
requirements
in the area of surveillance testing.
There were also continuing
performance
issues
identified in the work control process,
two of which
pertained
to post maintenance
testing.
You.are required to respond to this letter and should follow',the instructions
specified in the enclosed
Notice when preparing your response.
In your
response,
you should document the specific actions
taken -and any additional
actions
you plan to- prevent recurrence.
Your response
may reference
or
include previous docketed
correspondence, if the correspondence
adequately
96022003i7
960208
ADOCK 050003i5
G
4>geog
Areas examined during the inspection
are identified in the report.
Within
these
areas,
the inspection consisted of,a selective
examination of procedures
and representative
records,
observations,
and interviews with personnel.
This
report represents
an integra
ad product of a number of inspections
conducted
during the inspection period.
The summary contained
in the report provides
an
overview of our assessment
of your performance
in the functional
areas
inspected.
E.
E. Fitzpatrick
addresses
the required response.
After reviewing your response
to this
Notice, including your -proposed corrective actions
and the results of future
inspections,
the
NRC will determine whether further
NRC enforcement
action is
necessary
to ensure
compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
In-accordance
with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice,"
a copy of
this letter, its enclosures,
and your response will be placed in the
NRC
Public Document
Room (PDR).
To the extent possible,
your response
should not
include any personal
privacy, propriety, or safeguards
information so that it
can
be placed in the
PDR without redaction.
The responses
directed
by this letter and the accompanying
Notice are not
subject to the clearance
procedures
of the Office of Management
and Budget
as
required
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980,
PL 96-511.
We will gladly discuss
any questions
you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
/s/W. J.
Kropp, Chief
W. J.
Kropp, Chief
Reactor Projects
Branch
3
Docket No. 50-315
Docket No. 50-316
Enclosures:
1.
'.
Inspection
Report
No.
50-315/95013 (DRP);
50-316/95013 (DRP)
cc w/encl:
A. A. Blind, Site Vice President
John
Sampson,
Plant Manager
James
R. Padgett,
Michigan Public
Service
Commission
Michigan Department of
Public Health
Distribution:
Docket File w/encl
PUBLIC IE-01 w/encl
OC/LFDCB w/encl
SRI D.
C.
Cook w/encl
RMB/FEES w/o encl
R:iinsprptsipowersicookidcc95013.drp
DRP w/encl
RIII PRR w/encl
D.
C. Cook,
PM,
NRR w/encl
IPAS (E-Mail) w/encl
A. B. Beach,
w/encl
Sea httachod Coneurroaeo)
o rocotw a copy of this doc+et,
tadtcato fa tho hoa
C
~ Copy>>lthout attach/oocl
E
Copy ulth attach/oocl
N>>
No co
OFFICE
NAME
DATE
RIII
Jackiw d
02/
/96
RIII
Caniano
02/
/96
OFFICIAL RECORD
COPY
E.
E. Fitzpatrick
In accordance
with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice,"
a copy of
this letter, its enclosures,
and your response will be placed in the
NRC
Public Document
Room (PDR).
To the extent possible,
your response
should not
include any personal
privacy, propriety,
or safeguards
information so that it
can
be placed in the
PDR without redaction.
The responses
directed
by this letter and the accompanying
Notice are not
subject to the clearance
procedures
of the Office of Management
and Budget
as
required
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980,
PL 96-511.
We will gladly discuss
any questions
you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
Docket No. 50-315
Docket No. 50-316
W. J.
Kropp, Chief
Reactor Projects
Branch
3
Enclosures:
1.
2.
Inspection
Report
No.
50-315/95013(DRP);
50-316/95013 (DRP)
cc w/encl:
A. A. Blind, Site Vice President
John
Sampson,
Plant Hanager
James
R. Padgett,
Michigan Public
Service
Commission
Michigan Department of
Public Health
'b
Docket File w/encl
PUBLIC IE-Ol w/encl
OC/LFDCB w/encl
SRI D. C.
Cook w/encl
RHB/FEES w/o encl
DRP w/encl
RIII PRR w/encl
D.
C. Cook,
PH,
NRR w/encl
IPAS (E-Mail) w/encl
A. B. Beach,
w/encl
R:iinsprptsipowersicookidcc95013.drp
To vocaiva a copy of this docent,
isdicata ia tho hoa
C
Copy without attach/oacl
P i Copy with attach/aacl
N
No c
OFFICE
RIII
RIII
NANE
DATE
Jackiw
02
7
96
"
Caniano
02
96
OFFICIAL RECORD
COPY
J,
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOMMISSION
REGION III
801 WARRENVILLEROAD
USLE. ILLINOIS60532-.4351
February 8,
1996
Mr. E.
E. Fitzpatrick
Senior Vice President
Nuclear Generation
Company
1 Riverside
Plaza
Columbus,
OH
43216
SUBJECT:
INTEGRATED INSPECTION
REPORT 50-315/316-95013 (DRP)
Dear Mr. Fitzpatrick:
This refers to the routine safety inspection
conducted
by Messrs.
B. Bartlett,
D. Hartland,
C. Orsini,
R. Paul,
B. Fuller,
and
N. Shah of this office from
December
5,
1995,
through January
16,
1996.
The inspection
included
a review
of activities at your Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units
1 and 2.
At the conclusion of the inspection,
the findings were discussed
with those
members of your staff identified in the enclosed
report.
Areas
examined during the inspection
are identified in the report.
Within
these
areas,
the inspection consisted
of a selective
examination of procedures
and representative
records,
observations,
and interviews with personnel.
This
report represents
an integrated
product of a number of inspections
conducted
during the inspection period.
The summary contained
in the report provides
an
overview of our assessment
of your performance
in the functional
areas
inspected.
Based
on the results of this inspection,
the
NRC has determined that two
violations of NRC requirements
occurred.
The violatioIIs are cited in the
enclosed
Notice of Violation (Notice)
and the circumstances
surrounding
them
are described
in detail in the subject inspection report.
The violations are
of concern
because
in one case
a Technical Specification requirement for the
diesel
generators
was not properly implemented,
and in the other
case
there
was
a failure to test safety-related
equipment
under conditions
assumed
in
design basis
documents.
We are concerned
that during this inspection there were several
issues
identified which pertained
to implementation of technical specification
requirements
in the area of surveillance testing.
There were also continuing
performance
issues
identified in the work control process,
two of which
pertained
to post maintenance
testing.
You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions
specified in the enclosed
Notice when preparing your response.
In your
response,
you should document the specific actions
taken
and
any additional
actions you plan to prevent recurrence.
Your response
may reference
or
include previous docketed
correspondence, if the correspondence
adequately
E.
E. Fitzpatrick
addresses
the required
response.
After reviewing your response
to this
Notice, including your proposed corrective 'actions
and the res '.ts of future
inspections,
the
NRC will determine
whether further
NRC enforcement
action is
necessary
to ensure
compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
In accordance
with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice,"
a copy of
this letter, its enclosures,
and your response will be placed in the
NRC
Public Document
Room (PDR).
To the extent possible,
your response
should not
include
any personal
privacy, propriety, or safeguards
information so that it
can
be placed in the
PDR without redaction.
The responses
directed
by this letter and the accompanying
Notice are not
subject to the clearance
procedures
of the Office of Hanagement
and Budget
as
required
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980,
PL 96-511.
We will gladly discuss
any questions
you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
j/
(
W. J.
Kropp, Chief
Reactor Projects
Branch
3
Docket No. 50-315
Docket No. 50-316
Enclosures:
1.
2.
Inspection
Report
No.
50-315/95013 (DRP);
50-316/95013(DRP)
cc w/encl:
A. A. Blind, Site Vice President
John
Sampson,
Plant Hanager
James
R. Padgett,
Hichigan Public
Service
Commission
Hichigan Department of
Public Health