ML17333A295
| ML17333A295 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 01/29/1996 |
| From: | Axelson W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Fitzpatrick E INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17333A296 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9602150118 | |
| Download: ML17333A295 (6) | |
See also: IR 05000315/1995015
Text
UNITEo sTATes
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
801 iVAARENVILLCAOAD
USLC. IILINOIS60532
4351
January
29,
1996
f
Hr.
E.
E. Fitzpatrick
Senior Vice President
Nuclear Generation
Indiana Hichigan
Power
Company
1 Riverside
Plaza
Columbus,
OH
43216
SUBJECT:
D.
C.
COOK
INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE ASSESSHENT
IN-OFFICE REVIEW
PRELIHINARY RESULTS
(INSPECTION
REPORT 50-315/95015,
50-316/95015)
Dear Hr. Fitzpatrick:
During the period from January
8-22,
1996,
a team under the direction of
Region III completed
the preliminary phase of an Integrated
Performance
Assessment
of Donald
C.
Cook Nuclear Plant,
Units
1
and 2.
" This phase of the
assessment
consisted
of an in-office review of the inspection
record
and
performance history for a two-year period spanning
January
1994 to
January
1996.
The preliminary assessment
of the written record identifies
performance
strengths
and weaknesses
in the areas
of Safety
Assessment/Corrective
Action, Operations,
Engineering,
Haintenance,
and Plant
Support.
The results of the preliminary assessment
are
summarized
in the
attached
report
and are depicted
on the attached
Preliminary Performance
Assessment/Inspection
Planning Tree.
The second
phase of the assessment
will consist of a two week onsite
assessment
scheduled
to begin
on February
5,
1996.
During this phase of the
assessment,
the
team will attempt to determine current performance
and
compare
and contrast
those observations
and assessments
to its preliminary
observations
as well
as
draw conclusions
in those
areas originally considered
to be indeterminate.
The results of the onsite
assessment
will be evaluated
along with those of the preliminary assessment
and documented
in
a Final
Assessment
Report.
The final results will also
be depicted
on
a Final
Performance
Assessment/Inspection
Planning Tree.
This preliminary information is being provided for your information only.
No
response
to this letter or the preliminary assessment
is required.
.
9602150118
960129
ADOCK 05000315
8
~
~
E.
E. Fitzpatrick
Should you have
any questions
concerning this preliminary assessment,
or the
assessment
process
in general,
please
contact the assessment
team leader Hr.
Stanley Stasek
at (708) 829-9604.
Sincerely,
William L. Axelson, Director
Division of Reactor Projects
Docket No. 50-315
Docket No. 50-316
I
Enclosures:
1.
Preliminary Assessment
Report
2.
Preliminary Performance
Assessment/Inspection
Planning Tree
cc w/encls:
A. A. Blind, Site Vice President
John
Sampson,
Plant Manager
James
R. Padgett,
Michigan Public
Service
Commission
Michigan Department of
Public Health
Distribution
Docket File w/encl
PUBLIC IE-01 w/encl
OC/LFDCB w/encl
SRI,
D.
C.
Cook w/encl
RHB/FEES w/o encl
DRP w/encl
RIII PRR w/encl
D.
C.
Cook,
PH,
NRR w/encl
IPAS (E-Mail) w/encl
A. B.
Beach w/encl
DOCUMENT NAME:
R: iINSPRPTSiPOWERSiCOOKiDCC95015. DRP
To raca1ua
~ copy oS thea doc+ant,
tnd1cata
1n th>> hoa "C
~ Copy n1thout attachJanc1
f," ~ Copy uSth attach)cool
"N
No co
OFFICE
RIII
RIII
NAME
DATE
Grant,
Axels
n
01
/96
1
/96
OFFICIAL RECORD
COPY
g ~
S
I
~PR RKgI
Wp
+
O
ig
>>>>**4
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOMMISSION
REGION III
801 WARRENVILLEROAD
LISLE. ILLINOIS60532-4351
January
29,
1996
Hr.
E.
E.
Fitzpatri ck
Senior Vice President
Nuclear Generation
Indiana Hichigan
Power
Company
1 Riverside Plaza
Columbus,
OH
43216
SUBJECT:
D.
C.
COOK INTEGRATED PERFORHANCE
ASSESSHENT - IN-OFFICE REVIEW
PRELIHINARY RESULTS
(INSPECTION
REPORT 50-315/95015,
50-316/95015)
Dear Hr. Fitzpatri ck:
During the period from January
8-22,
1996,
a team under the direction of
Region III completed
the preliminary phase of an Integrated
Performance
Assessment
of Donald
C.
Cook Nuclear Plant, Units
1
and 2.
This phase of the
assessment
consisted of an in-office review of the inspection record
and
performance history for a two-year period spanning
January
1994 to
January
1996.
The preliminary assessment
of the written record identifies
performance
strengths
and weaknesses
in the areas
of Safety
'ssessment/Corrective
Action, Operations,
Engineering,
Haintenance,
and Plant
Support.
The results of the preliminary assessment
are
summarized
in the
attached
report
and are depicted
on the attached
Preliminary Performance
Assessment/Inspection
Planning Tree.
The second
phase of the assessment
will consist of a two week onsite
assessment
scheduled
to begin
on February
5,
1996.
During this phase of the
assessment,
the team will attempt to determine current performance
and
compare
and contrast
those observations
and
assessments
to its preliminary
observations
as well
as draw conclusions
in those
areas originally considered
to be indeterminate.
The results of the onsite
assessment
will be evaluated
along with those of the preliminary assessment
and documented
in a Final
Assessment
Report.
The final results will also
be depicted
on
a Final
Performance
Assessment/Inspection
Planning Tree.
This preliminary information is being provided for your information only.
No
response
to this letter or the preliminary assessment
is required.
E.
E. Fitzpatrick
Should you have
any questions
concerning this preliminary assessment,
or the
assessment
process
in general,
please
contact the assessment
team leader
Mr.
Stanley Stasek
at
(708) 829-9604.
Sincerely,
Will)am L. Axel on, Director
Division of Reactor Projects
Docket No.
50-315
Docket Ho. 50-316
Enclosures:
1.
Preliminary Assessment
Report
2.
Preliminary Performance
Assessment/Inspection
Planning Tree
cc w/encls:
A. A. Blind, Site Vice President
John
Sampson,
Plant Manager
James
R. Padgett,
Michigan Public
Service
Commission
Michigan Department of
Public Health