ML17332A803
| ML17332A803 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 06/08/1995 |
| From: | Kropp W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Fitzpatrick E INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17332A804 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9506210056 | |
| Download: ML17332A803 (6) | |
See also: IR 05000315/1995006
Text
June 8,
1995
Mr. E.
E. Fitzpatrick
Senior Vice President
Nuclear Generation
Company
1 Riverside
Plaza
Columbus,
OH
43216
Dear Mr. Fitzpatrick:
This refers to the routine safety inspection
conducted
by Messrs.
J.
Isom,
D. Hartland,
C. Orsini,
W. Pegg, J. Belanger,
and V. Lougheed of this office
from March 21 through
May 15,
1995.
The inspection
included
a review of
activities at your Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Plant, Units
1 and 2.
At the
conclusion of the inspection,
the findings were discussed
with those
members
of your staff identified in the enclosed report.
Areas
examined during the inspection
are identified in the report.
Within
these
areas,
the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures
and representative
records,
observations,
and interviews with personnel.
No violations of NRC requirements
were identified during this inspection.
The areas
examined during the inspection
included
a review of D.C. Cook'
Generic Letter 89-10 motor operated
valve
(MOV) program.
We found that your
engineers
have
made progress
toward
MOV program closure.
However,
two major
impediments
remained.
The first impediment
was the poor justification of the
valve factors applied to non-differentially pressure
tested
valves.
The
second
impediment
was the poor documentation
available to demonstrate
the
design basis capability of GL 89-10
MOVs.
If you determine that these
concerns will change
the currently docketed
commitment date for GL 89-10 program closure,
then
a schedule
extension
request
must
be prepared
in accordance
with the guidance
provided in GL 89-10,
Supplement
6,
and submitted at the earliest possible time.
9sos2~ooss
9sosos
ADOCK OS0003lS
8
E.
E. Fitzpatrick
~
~
~
~
In accordance
with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations,
a copy of
this letter and the enclosure will be placed in the
NRC Public Document
Room.
We will gladly discuss
any questions
you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
Docket No. 50-315
Docket No. 50-316
/s/Wayne J.
Kropp, Chief
Wayne J.
Kropp, Chief
Reactor Projects
Section
2A
Enclosure:
Inspection
Report
No. 50-315/95006(DRP);
50-316/95006(DRP)
cc w/encl:
A. A. Blind, Plant Manager
James
R. Padgett,
Michigan Public
Service
Commission
Michigan Department of
Public Health
Distribution:
Docket File w/encl
PUBLIC IE-Ol w/encl
OC/LFDCB w/encl
SRI D. C.
Cook w/encl
DRP w/encl
RIII'PRR w/encl
D.
C. Cook,
PM,
NRR w/encl
IPAS (E-Mail) w/encl
Document:
R:ginsprptsgpowersgcookgdcc95006.drp
To receiw a <<opy of this occident, indicate in the hoa
C
Copy wlthoot attach/encl
P
Copy with attach/encl
N
No co
OFFICE
RIII
RIII
RIII
E
RIII
8
RIII
RIII
NAME
Ja48w.
"LO
Jaco
par
2,4
6
rda
para
2.b,2.e
Cr ed
ar
3 ~
Piro
(Y
Kroppp~
DATE
05 >i
95
Ob
95
42'95
0
95
.
Ot5
95
OFFICIAL RECORD
COPY
{8 <7 95
~Co
<gR RECy
CWp0
+a**+
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOMMISSION
REGION III
801 WARRENVILLEROAD
LISLE, ILLINOIS60532-4351
June 8,
1995
Hr.
E.
E. Fitzpatrick
Senior Vice President
Nuclear Generation
Company
1 Riverside
Plaza
Columbus,
OH
43216
Dear Mr. Fitzpatrick:
This refers to the routine safety inspection
conducted
by Hessrs.
J.
Isom,
D. Hartland,
C. Orsini,
W. Pegg,
J. Belanger,
and V. Lougheed of this office
from March
21 through
Hay 15,
1995.
The inspection
included
a review of
activities at your Donald
C.
Cook Nuclear Plant, Units
1 and 2.
At the
conclusion of the inspection,
the findings were discussed
with those
members
of your staff identified in the enclosed report.
Areas
examined during the inspection
are identified in the report.
Within
these
areas,
the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of .procedures
and representative
records,
observations,
and interviews with personnel.
No violations of NRC requirements
were identified during this inspection.
The areas
examined during the inspection
included
a review of D.C. Cook'
Generic Letter 89-10 motor operated
valve
(MOV) program.
We found that your
engineers
have
made progress
toward
HOV program closure.
However,
two major
impediments
remained.
The first impediment
was the poor justification of the
valve factors applied to non-differenti,ally pressure
tested valves.
The
second
impediment
was the poor documentation
available to demonstrate
the
design basis capability of GL 89-10
MOVs.
If you determine that these
concerns will change
the currently docketed
commitment date for GL 89-10 program closure,
then
a schedule
extension
request
must
be prepared
in accordance
with the guidance
provided in GL 89-10,
Supplement
6,
and submitted at the earliest possible time.
~
~
E.
E. Fitzpatrick
In accordance
with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's
regulations,
a copy of
this letter and the enclosure will be placed in the
NRC Public Document
Room.
We will gladly discuss
any questions
you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
Docket No. 50-315
Docket No. 50-316
p
J.
K opp, Chief
Reactor Projects
Section
2A
Enclosure:
Inspection
Report
No. 50-315/95006(DRP);
50-316/95006(DRP)
cc w/encl:
A. A. Blind, Plant Manager
James
R. Padgett,
Michigan Public
Service
Commission
Michigan Department of
Public Health