ML17332A788
| ML17332A788 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 05/30/1995 |
| From: | Creed J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Fitzpatrick E INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17332A789 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9506120021 | |
| Download: ML17332A788 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000315/1995007
Text
I
Hay 30,
1995
Hr.
E.
E. Fitzpatrick
Senior Vice President
Nuclear Generation
Indiana Hichigan Power
Company
1 Riverside
Plaza
Columbus,
OH
43216
SUBJECT:
EHERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS
EXERCISE
INSPECTION AT D.
C.
COOK
Dear Hr. Fitzpatrick:
This refers to the routine safety inspection
conducted
by Hr. J. Foster of
this office and others
on Hay 8-12,
1995.
The inspection
included
a review of
authorized activities at your D. C.
Cook facility.
At the conclusion of the
inspection,
the findings were discussed
with those
members of your staff
identified in the enclosed report.
Areas
examined during the inspection
are identified in the report.
Within
these
areas,
the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures
and representative
records,
interviews,
and observation of activities in
progress.
No violations of NRC requirements
were identified during the course of this
inspection.
One exercise
weakness
was identified during this inspection which will require
corrective action.
The weakness
is summarized
in the Appendix to this letter.
As required
by 10 CFR 50,. Appendix
E (IV.F), any weaknesses
that are
identified must
be corrected.
In accordance
with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations,
a copy of
this letter and the enclosed
inspection report will be placed in the
NRC
Public Document
Room.
950hi20021
950530
ADOCK 050003l5
9
~~BC FEE CH>TE COPV
g(4lu'
Indiana Hichigan Power
Company
We will gladly discuss
any questions
you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
Docket Nos. 50-315;
50-316
ames
R. Cree
,
hief
Safeguards
5 IR Section
Enclosures:
cc w/encls:
l.
Appendix, Notice
of Weakness
2.
Inspection
Reports
No. 50-315/95007(DRSS);
No. 50-316/95007(DRSS)
A. A. Blind, Plant Manager
James
R. Padgett,
Michigan Public
Service
Commission
Michigan Department of
Public Health
Distri
ggkke~c~'~j~n
~>
PUBLIC IE-06 w/encls
OC/LFDCB w/encls
SRI D. C.
Cook w/encls
DRP w/encls
RIII PRR w/encls
D. C. Cook,
PH,
NRR w/encls
IPAS (E-Hail) w/encls
DOCUMENT NAME:
A:DCC95007.DSS
To receive ~ copy of thie document, Indicate In the boxt
C" ~ Copy without attachmcntlancloauro
E
~ Copy with attachment/ancioauro
N
~ No copy
OFFICE
RIII
L>, RIII
RI
NAME
DATE
oster.j
5/M/95
JC
WKro
0
/95
05/4) /95
0zzrcrm @acorn co
Appendix
Exercise
Weakness
There
was confusion over the initial protective action recommendation
(PAR).
The formal
PAR (notification form) from the utility was evacuation
out two
miles around the plant
and
5 miles for downwind sectors.
Verbal communication
erroneously
referenced
a
PAR of sheltering,
and the State action
was
sheltering of the licensee-designated
sectors.
A wind change
had altered the
affected sectors
by this time.
The
EOF manager called the State
and clarified
the issue,
but confusion
over the
PAR continued for some time.
An Exercise
Weakness
was identified regarding verbal
communication of Protective Action
Recommendations
to the State of Michigan (50-315/95007-02;
50-316/95007-02)).