ML17332A420
| ML17332A420 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 11/17/1994 |
| From: | Kropp W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Fitzpatrick E INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17332A421 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9411230022 | |
| Download: ML17332A420 (7) | |
See also: IR 05000315/1994020
Text
November
17,
1994
Company
ATTN:
Mr. E.
E. Fitzpatrick
Senior Vice President
Nuclear Generation
1 Riverside
Plaza
Columbus,.
OH
43216
Dear Mr. Fitzpatrick:
This refers to the routine safety inspection
conducted
by Messrs.
James
A.
Isom, David J. Hartland,
and
James
L. Belanger of this office from
September
24 through October
29,
1994.
The inspection
included a.review of
activities at your Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Plant, Units
1 and 2.
At the
conclusion of the inspection,
the findings were discussed
with those
members
of your staff identified in the enclosed report.
Areas
examined during the inspection
are identified in the report.
Within
these
areas,
the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures
and representative
records,
observations,
and interviews with personnel.
The security organization
continued to effectively implement the requirements
of the approved security plan.
The contract security force performed their
duties with a high degree of professionalism.
The upgrading of the security
computer
system
and alarm stations
was indicative of an excellent
management
support for the program.-
During this inspection,
certain of your activities appeared
to be in violation
of NRC requirements.
However,
as described
in the enclosed
inspection report,
the violation was categorized
as
a Severity Level
V and is not being cited
because
the criteria specified in Section VII.B(1) of the "General
Statement
of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement,"
10 CFR Part 2, Appendix
C (1994)),
were satisfied.
In accordance
with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's
regulations,
a copy of
this letter and the enclosure will be placed in the
NRC Public Document
Room.
220Pg p
I;~
i
94ii230022 94iii7
ADOCK 050003i5
8
FDR
Company
We will gladly discuss
any questions
you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
Original signed
by
Wayne J.
Kropp, Chief
Wayne J.
Kropp, Chief
Reactor Projects
Section
2A
Docket No. 50-315
Docket No. 50-316
Enclosure:
Inspection
Report
No.
50-315/94020(DRP);
50-316/94020 (DRP )
cc w/encl:
A. A. Blind, Plant Manager
James
R. Padgett,
Michigan Public
Service
Commission
Michigan Department of
Public Health
Distribution:
Docket File w/encl
PUBLIC IE-Ol w/encl
OC/LFDCB w/encl
SRI,
D.
C.
Cook w/encl
DRP w/encl
RIII PRR w/encl
D.
C. Cook,
PM,
NRR w/encl
Document:
R: iinsprptsipowersicookidcc94020. drp
To rocaiva a copy of this document, indicato in tha hox
C" ~ Copy seithout attach/ancl
P ~ Copy with attach/oncl
H
No <<o
OFFICE
NAME
RIII
Jackdaw
'/-
~jt
RI
RIII
Jaco
o
Pi ok
RIII
Kro
DATE
ll/ s
94
ll/g 94
OFFICIAL RECORD
0 Y
11 ~/94
11 / /94
uNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
801 WARRENVILLEROAD
LISLE. ILLINOIS60532-4351
November 1?,
1994
Company
ATTN:
Hr.
E.
E. Fitzpatrick
Senior Vice President
Nuclear Generation
1 Riverside
Plaza"
Columbus,
OH
43216
Dear Hr. Fitzpatrick:
This refers to the routine safety inspection
conducted
by Hessrs.
James
A.
Isom,
David J. Hartland,
and
James
L. Belanger of this office from
September
24 through October 29,
1994.
The .inspection
included
a revi'ew of
activities at your Donald
C.
Cook Nuclear Plant, Units
1 and 2.
At the
conclusion of the inspection,
the findings were discussed
with those
members
of your staff identified in the enclosed report.
Areas examined during the inspection
are identified in the report.
Within
these
areas,
the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures
and representative
records,
observations,
and interviews with personnel.
The security organization
continued to effectively implement the requirements
of the approved security plan.
The contract security force performed their
duties with a high degree of professionalism.
The upgrading of the security
computer'ystem
and alarm stations
was indicative of an excellent
management
support for the program.
During this inspection,
certain of your activities appeared
to be in violation
of NRC requirements.
However,
as described
in the enclosed
inspection report,
the violation was categorized
as
a Severity Level
V and is not being cited
because
the criteria specified in Sectioh VII.B(1) of the "General
Statement
of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement,"
10 CFR Part 2, Appendix
C (1994)),
were satisfied.
In accordance
with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations,
a copy of
this letter and the enclosure will be placed in the
NRC Public Document
Room.
Indiana Hichigan
Power
Company
We will gladly discuss
any questions
you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
Wayne
K
pp
Chief
Reactor Projects
Section
2A
Docket No. 50-315
Docket No. 50-316
Enclosure:
Inspection
Report
No.
50-315/94020(DRP);
50-316/94020(DRP)
cc w/encl:
A. A. Blind, Plant Hanager
James
R. Padgett,
Hichigan Public
Service
Commission
Hichigan Department of
Public Health