ML17332A196
| ML17332A196 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 06/27/1994 |
| From: | Geeenman E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Fitzpatrick E INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17332A197 | List: |
| References | |
| GL-89-10, NUDOCS 9407080009 | |
| Download: ML17332A196 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000315/1994009
Text
PRIORITY 2
(NUDOCS OFFSITE FACILITY)
REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
'CCESSION NBR:9407080009
DOC.DATE: 94/06/27
NOTARZZED:
NO
DOCKET
FACIL:50-315 Donald
C.
Cook Nuclear
Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana
M
05000315
50-316 Donald C.
Cook Nuclear
Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana
M
05000316
AUTH.NAME
AUTHOR AFFILIATION
GEEENMAN,E.G.
Region
3 (Post
820201)
RECIP.NAME
RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
-FITZPATRICK,E.
Co. (formerly Indiana
& Michigan Ele
P
SUBJECT:
Forwards insp repts
50-315/94-09
& 50-316/94-09
on 940423-
0603
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
IE01D
COPIES
RECEIVED:LTR
ENCL
SIZE:
TITLE: General
(50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response
NOTES:
RECIPIENT
ID CODE/NAME
PD3-1
INTERNAL: AEOD/DEIB
AEOD/DSP/TPAB
DEDRO
NRR/DRCH/HHFB
NRR/PMAS/IRCB-E
OE DIR
REG:-F~
0 2
RGN3
FILE, 01
EXTERNAL: EG&G/BRYCE,J.H.
COPIES
LTTR ENCL
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
RECIPIENT
ID CODE/NAME
HICKMAN,J
AEOD/DSP/ROAB
AEOD/TTC
NRR/DORS/OEAB
NRR/PMAS/ILPBl
NUDOCS-ABSTRACT
OGC/HDS2
RES/HFB
NRC
COPIES
LTTR ENCL
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2,
NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE iVASTE!CO)iTACTTHE DOCUMENTCONTROL
DESK, ROOM PI-37 (EXT. 504-2083 ) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAMEFROM
DISTRIBUTIONLISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'
NEED!
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES
REQUIRED:
LTTR
20
ENCL
20
JUN 8V l994
Docket No. 50-315
Docket No. 50-316
Indiana Hichigan
Power
Company
ATTN:
Hr.
E.
E. Fitzpatrick
Senior Vice President
Nuclear Generation
1 Riverside
Plaza
Columbus,
OH
43216
Dear Hr. Fitzpatrick:
This refers to the routine safety inspection
conducted
by Hessrs.
James
A.
Isom,
David J. Hartland, Christine A. Gainty, Joel
G.
Guzman,
and
Edward
R.
Schweibinz of this office from April 23,
1994,
through June 3,
1994.
The
inspection
included
a review of activities at your Donald
C.
Cook Nuclear
Plant, Units
1 and 2, facility.
At the conclusion of the inspection,
the
findings were discussed
with those
members of your staff identified in the
enclosed report.
Areas
examined during the inspection
are identified in the report.
Within
these
areas,
the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures
and representative
records,
observations,
and interviews with personnel.
Based
on the results of this inspection,
certain of your activities appeared
to be in violation of NRC requirements,
as specified in the enclosed
Notice of
Violation (Notice).
The violation is of concern
because
you failed to perform
an engineering
evaluation of a motor-operated
valve
(HOV) that was in an over-
thrust condition.
We a'e also concerned
with the lack of progress
made
by
the engineering staff in validating assumptions
used in your
HOV program.
The
need to justify programmatic
assumptions
was identified as
an unresolved
item
during
a previous inspection
(50-315/93006-02(DRS);
50-316/93006-02(DRS))
and
will be
an important aspect to ensure timely GL 89-10 closure.
Additionally, during this inspection,
another activity appeared
to be in
violation of NRC requirements.
The violation was categorized
at Severity
Level
V and is not being cited because
the criteria specified in 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C,Section VII.B(l) were satisfied.
9407080009
940627
ADOCK 05000315
8
Company
~N p-7 >gg4
P
You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions
specified in the enclosed
Notice when preparing your response.
In your
response,
you should
document the specific actions
taken
and
any additional
actions
you plan to'prevent recurrence.
After reviewing your response
to this
Notice, including your proposed corrective actions
and the results of future
inspections,
the
NRC will determine
whether further
NRC enforcement
action is
necessary
to ensure
compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
In accordance
with 10
CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations,
a copy of
this letter, the enclosure,
and your response
to this letter will be placed in
the
NRC Public Document
Room.
The responses
directed
by this letter and the accompanying
Notice are not
subject to the clearance
procedures
of the Office of Management
an'd Budget
as
required
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980,
PL 96-511.
We will gladly discuss
any questions
you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
Enclosures:
1.
2.
Inspection
Report
No.
50-315/94009(DRP);
50-316/94009 (DRP)
cc w/enclosure:
A., A. Blind, Plant Manager.
OC/LFDCB
Resident
Inspector,
RIII
James
R. Padgett,
Hichigan Public
Service
Commission
Michigan Department of
Public Health
D. C. Cook,
LPH,
S. Stein,
bcc:
"Public"
Division of Reactor Projects
RIII
Orsini
'R
I
Jaco
en
(par'a
.c, 7.a)
RIII4 +or
Gardner
(para 7.c)
(par
3.
)
I
RIII
yv 3,a(
k
Greenman
,(u
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
801 WARRENVILLEROAD
.
LISLE, ILLINOIS60532-4351
JUN 2'7 I9g4
Docket No. 50-315
Docket No. 50-316
Indiana Hichigan
Power
Company
ATTN:
Hr.
E.
E. Fitzpatrick
Senior Vice President
Nuclear'eneration
1 Riverside
Plaza
Columbus,
OH
43216
Dear Hr. Fitzpatrick:
This refers to the routine safety inspection
conducted
by Hessrs.
James
A.
Isom, David J. Hartland, Christine A. Gainty, Joel
G.
GuzIhan,
and
Edward
R.
Schweibinz of this office from April 23,
1994,
through June 3,
1994.
The
inspection
included
a review of activities at your Donald
C.
Cook Nuclear
Plant, Units
1 and 2.
At the conclusion of the inspection,
the findings were
discussed
with those
members of your staff identified in the enclosed
report.
Areas
examined during the inspection
are identified in the report.
Within
these
areas,
the inspection
consisted
of a selective
examination of procedures
and representative
records,
observations,
and interviews with personnel.
Based
on the results of this inspection,
certain of your activities appeared
to be in violation of NRC requirements,
as specified in the enclosed
Notice of
Violation (Notice).
The violation is of concern
because
you failed to perform
an engineering
evaluation of a motor-operated
valve
(HOV) that was in an over-
thrust condition.
We are also concerned
with the lack of progress
made
by
the engineering staff in validating assumptions
used in your
HOV program.
The
need to justify programmatic
assumptions
was identified as
an unresolved
item
during
a previous inspection
(50-315/93006-02(DRS);
50-316/93006-02(DRS))
and
will- be
an important aspect
to ensure timely GL 89-10 closure.
I
Additionally, during this inspection,
another activity appeared
to be in
violation of NRC requirements.
The violation was categorized
at Severity
Level
V and is not being cited because
the criteria specified in 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C,Section VII.B(1) were satisfied.
Company
JUN 27 8)4
il
You are required to respond to this letter'and
should follow the instructions
specified in the enclosed
Notice when preparing your response.
In your
response,
you should document the specific actions
taken
and
any additional
actions
you plan to prevent recurrence.
After reviewing your response
to this
Notice, including your proposed corrective actions
and the results of future
inspections,
the
NRC will determine whether further
NRC enforcement
action is
necessary
to ensure
compliance with NRC regulatory requirem'ents.
In accordance
with 10 CfR 2.790 of the Commission's
regulations,
a copy of
this letter, the enclosure,
and your response
to this letter will be placed
in
the
NRC Public Document
Room.
The responses
directed
by this letter and the accompanying
Notice are not
subject to the clearance
procedures
of the Office of Management
and Budget
as
required
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980,
PL 96-511.
t
We will gladly discuss
any questions
you have concerning this inspection.
'Sincerely,
/~Q.Q~
Edward
G.
Greenman,
Director
Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosures:
1.
2.
Inspection
Report
No.
50-315/94009(DRP);
50-316/94009(DRP)
cc w/enclosure:
A. A. Blind; Plant Manager
OC/LFDCB
Resident
Inspector, RIII
James
R. Padgett,
Michigan Public
Service
Commission
Michigan Department of
Public Health
D.
C.
Cook,
LPH,
S. Stein,