ML17331A930

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 930607-18.Violation Noted: Preventive Maint Task Intervals Based on Date When Maint Work Package Closed Rather than Date Preventive Maint Task Last Performed
ML17331A930
Person / Time
Site: Cook  
Issue date: 08/09/1993
From: Wright G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML17331A929 List:
References
50-315-93-15, 50-316-93-15, NUDOCS 9308120011
Download: ML17331A930 (2)


Text

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Indiana Hichigan Power Company Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2

Docket Nos..50-315; 50-316 Licenses No. DPR-58; No.

DPR-74 During an NRC inspection conducted June 7-18, 1993, violations of NRC requirements were identified.

In accordance with the "General Statement of

" Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violations are listed below:

2.

3.

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V states that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions or procedures, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions or procedures.

Procedure HHI-5030, "Preventive Haintenance Program",

Revision 13, with change sheets 1 through 5, Paragraphs

4. 13 and 6.3.2.A, required that the interval for performing periodic preventive maintenance tasks be based on the date the task was last performed.

Contrary to the above, from January 1993 to June 9,

1993, preventive maintenance task intervals were based on the date when the maintenance work package was closed rather than the date the preventive maintenance task was last performed (315/316-93015-01(DRS)).

'his is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion VI states that measures shall assure that documents, including. changes, are reviewed for adequacy and approved for release by authorized personnel and are distributed to and used at the location where the prescribed activity is performed.

Contrary to the above, from 1990 to June 16,

1993, approved changes to maintenance head instructions were not distributed to the safety and assessment satellite library, which was used by licensee personnel to obtain work related instructions (315/316-93015-02(DRS)).

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

10 CFR 50, Appendix R, Section III.J states that emergency lighting units with at least an 8-hour battery power supply shall be provided in all areas needed for operation of safe shutdown equipment and in access and egress routes thereto.

Contrary to the above, from January 1993 to June 15,

1993, emergency lighting was not provided in all areas needed for operation of safe shutdown equipment and in access and egress routes thereto due to 9308i200ii 930809 PDR
  • DOCK 050003i5 6

PDR

Notice of Violation conditions that existed on a number of emergency lighting units that rendered the units inoperable (315/316-93015-03(DRS)).

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Indiana Michigan Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:

Document Control

Desk, Washington, D.C.

20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region. III, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).

This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:

(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results

achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for information may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Glen Ellyn, Illinois this 9~ay of~~ 1993 eo rey rig t, ie Engineering Branch