ML17329A439
| ML17329A439 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 04/06/1992 |
| From: | Shafer W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Fitzpatrick E INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9204100129 | |
| Download: ML17329A439 (19) | |
Text
'p'1I 866'Ii Cg 0
O'o I
/p +a*++
VNITEO STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 799 ROOSEVELT ROAD GLEN ELLYN, ILI INOIS 601 37
- APR, 6 1992
.Docket No. 50-315 Docket No. 50-316 Indiana Hichigan Power Company ATTN:
Hr.
E.
E. Fitzpatrick Vice President Nuclear Operations Division 1 Riverside Plaza
- Columbus, OH 43216
Dear Hr. Fitzpatrick:
On April 2,
- 1992, Hr. Dave Passehl'f this office was contacted by a member of your staff with a request for. a copy of the slides which were used during our discussions on Harch 26,
- 1992, concerning our recently completed Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP).
While our SALP meeting of Harch 26, was a public meeting, the. slides were not distributed at the meeting because no one requested them.
The information you requested is attached.
In order to ensure public access to the information, a copy of this letter and the attachment will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this information.
Sincerely,
Attachment:
As Stated W.
D. Shaf
, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2
cc w/attachment:
A. A. Blind, Plant Hanager DCD/DCB (RIDS)
OC/LFDCB Resident Inspector, RIII James R. Padgett, Hichigan Public Service Commission EIS Coordinator, USEPA Region 5 Office Hichigan Department of Public Health D.
C.
U. S. NRC REGION III C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT SALP 10
. PRESENTATION MARCH 26, 1992 D.C. COOK VISITOR'S CENTER BRIDGMAN; Ml
D.C. COOK SALP 10 March 26, 1992 AGENDA 0 enin Remarks:
C. J. Paperiello, Deputy Regional Administrator SALP Process:
B. L. Jorgensen, Chief, Section 2A SALP Presentation:
J. A. lsom (OPS, M/S, E/TS)
D. G. Passehl (RC, EP, SEC)
T. Colburn, (SA/QV)
Summar:
E. G. Greenman, Director, DRP Licensee Comments:
E. E. Fitzpatrick, V-P Nuclear Closin Remarks:
C. J. Paperiello In uiries:
Public and Media
I' Evaluations of Licensee Performance Normally Performed Every 12-18 Months
+ Four Performance Ratings are Used by NRC:
Category 1
=
Superior Level Category 2 =
Good Level Category 3
Acceptable Level Category N
Not Rated Trending (When Used) improving Declining
+ Strengths, Challenges, Other
SALP FUNCTIONALAREAS. EXAMINED
+ PLANT OPERATIONS
+ RADIOLOGICALCONTROLS
+
IMIAINTENANCE/SURVEILLANCE
+
+ 'SECURITY
\\
+ ENGINEERING/TECHNICALSUPPORT
+ SAFETY ASSESSMENT/QUALITY VERIFICATION
e SALP EVALUATIONCRITERIA
+ Management Effectiveness in Assuring Quality
+ Approach to Resolution of Technical issues From a Safety Standpoint
+ Enforcement. History
+ Operational Events
+ Staffing (Including Management)
,+ Training and Qualification Effectiveness
SALP BOARD
+ Typical Voting Members of the Board Include:
Director, Division of Reactor Projects.
{Chairman)
Director, Division of Reactor Safety, Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards Branch Chief, Division of Reactor Projects Senior Resident Inspector Director, NRR Projects Directorate NRR Project Manager
+ The Board Evaluates the Functional Areas A Rating is Assigned to Each'unctional Area Rating Assignments are Based on Majority Vote
'onclusions Based on Fact 8c Subjective Judgement
+ The Regional Administrator has Final Approval of the SALP Ratings and Report
D.C. COOK SALP 10 PLANT OPERATIONS Rated 2
Overall operational performance continued.
to be strong, but errors occurred during non-routine operations and emergency scenarios.
STRENGTHS
~ Prompt Transient Response and Control
~
m e
uai ie a
~ Control Room Professionalism
~ Management's Efforts to Minimize Distractions CHALLENGES
~ Performance During Non-Power Operations
~ Resolution of Fire Protection Issues
~ Training
3 Rated 2
D.C. COOK SALP 10 RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS I
Performance has improved.
STRENGTHS
~ Aggressive Program for Hot Particle, Contamination Control, and.Waste Reduction
~ Continued Support by,Upper Management for Radiological Program Improvements, Including ALARA CHALLENGES
~ Timely Correction of Radiological Controlled Area Egress Weaknesses
~ Resolution of Effluent Monitor Performance Problems OTHER
~
a e an x erience a
D.C. COOK SALP 10 MAINTENANCE SURVEILLANCE Rated 2
Gradual improvement in the maintenance programs. Management focus should continue.
STRENGTHS
~ Material Condition & Housekeeping
~ Surveillance Program CHALLENGES
~ Backlogged Job Orders
~ Root Cause Analyses
~ Maintenance Program Implementation
~ Procedure Availability 8 Adherence OTHER
~
m rovemen in ana emen nvo vemen
D.C. COOK SALP 10 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNE.SS h
Rated 1
Continued superior performance over the last three SALP periods.
STRENGTHS
~ Management Effectiveness
~ Performance of Challenging Exercises CHALLENGES' None
lt D.C. COOK SALP 10 SECURITY Rated 1
Sustained strong performance as result of the licensee's efforts and management support.
STRENGTHS
'anagement Support Audit Program
~ Security System Evaluation and Upgrades
~ Training
~ Staffing CHALLENGES
~ None
D.C. COOK SALP 10 ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL SUPPORT Rated 2
Performance improved throughout the assessment period.
Additional improvement in the modification program, root cause
- analysis, and operator training are needed.
STRENGTHS
~ Corporate Engineering Design Expertise
~
on ro o
ems ssi ne o
n ineerin CHALLENGES
~ Quality and Content of Modification Packages
~ Operator Training
~ Root Cause Analyses OTHER
~
ar e-ore i in econs i-U ion ro ram o System Engineering Group Staffing
D.C. COOK SALP 10 SAFETY ASSESSMENT/
QUALITY VERIFICATION Rated 2
Some improvement noted.
STRENGTHS
~ Self-Improvement Initiatives and Assessments
~ Identification of Non-Conforming Conditions
'HALLENGES
~ Root Cause Analyses
~ Tracking and Resolution of Open Items
~ Oversight of the 10 CFR 50.59 Review Process OTHER
~ External Communications
D. C. COOK SALP 10 PERFORMANCE BY EVALUATIONCRITERIA FUNCTIONAL MGMT.
RESOLUTION OF 8
1
~~ ~
IL-"
PLANT OPS
. +
+
RAD. CNTRLS
+
y MAINT/S RVL EP
+
+
SEC URITY
+
E/TS 2
SA/QV
+ Strength Weakness