ML17329A229

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Safety Insp Repts 50-315/91-22 & 50-316/91-22 on 910904-1015.Violation Noted But Not Cited
ML17329A229
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 11/04/1991
From: Beverly Clayton
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Fitzpatrick E
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
Shared Package
ML17329A230 List:
References
NUDOCS 9111110223
Download: ML17329A229 (6)


See also: IR 05000315/1991022

Text

Docket No. 50-315

Docket No. 50-316

NOV 04

1991

Indiana Michigan Power

Company

ATTN:

Yir. E.

E. Fitzpatrick

.

Yice Pres'ident

Nuclear Operations

Division

1 Riverside Plaza

Columbus,

OM

43216

Dear fir. Fitzpatrick:

This refers to the routine safety inspection

conducted

by J.

A. Isom,

D.

G. Passehl,

E.

R. Schweibinz,

and Jeffrey F. Harold of this office from

September

4 through October

15,

1991, of activities at the Don'aid

C.

Cook

Nuclear Plant,

Units

1 and 2, authorized

by

NRC Operating

Licenses

No.

DPR-58

and DPR-74,

and to the discussion

of our findings with A. A. Blind and others

of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

The enclosed

copy of our inspection report identifies areas

examined

during

the inspection.

Within these

areas,

the inspection

consisted

of a selective

examinatiori of procedures

and representative

records,

observations,

and

interviews with personnel.

During the inspection,

one

item

violation of HRC requirements.

taken to correct the identified

Consequent-ly,

we have exercised

Enforcement Policy.

Because

we

and correction of problems,

and

Part 2, Appendix C, Section

V.G

violation is not being cited.

was identified which appeared

to be in

The inspection

showed that actions

are being

violation and prevent recurrence.

the'discretion

provided for under the

NRC

want to encourage

prompt self-identification

because

the criteria specified

in 10

CFR

of the Enforcement Policy were satisfied,

the

In accordance

wish

10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's

regulations,

a copy 'of

this letter

and the enclosure will be placed in the

NRC Public Document

Room'.

We will gladly discuss

any questions

you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

9>>>>iov23 9>>i0 l

PDR

ADOCK 050003i5

6

PDR

Brent

C 1 ay ton,

Chi ef

Reactor Projects

Branch

2

Enclosure:

1. Inspection

Reports

No. 50-315/91022(DRP);

No. 50-316/91022(DRP)

See Attached Distribution

~Sc

bibicz/dP

(. VOC.:

"

Jo

ensen

/

RIII

C 1 ay ton

Indiana Michigan Power

Company

Distribution

cc w/enclosure:

A. A. Blind, Plant Manager

DCD/DCB (RIDS)

OC/LFDCB

Resident

Inspector, RIII

James

R. Padgett,

michigan Public

Service

Commission

'IS Coordinator,

USEPA

'egion

5 Office

Michigan Department of

Pub 1 i c Health

D.

C.

Cook,

LPM,

NRR

gp II R<CII

(4

P0

Cy

nO

Vl

c

E,

0

4y

Y/

+a*++

Docket No. 50-315

Docket No. 50-316

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

799 ROOSEVELT ROAD

GLEN ELLYN, ILLINOIS 60137

t".QI

U

-

Indiana Hichigan

Power

Company

ATTN:

Hr. E.

E. Fitzpatrick

Yice President

Nuclear Operations Division

1 Riverside Plaza

Columbus,

OH

43216

Dear YIr. Fi tzpa tri c k:

This refers to the routine safety

inspection

conducted

by J.

A. Isom,

D.

G. Passehl,

E.

R. Schweibinz,

and Jeffrey F. Harold of this office from

September

4 through October

15,

1991, of activities at the Donald

C.

Cook

Nuclear Plant, Units

1 and 2, authorized

by

NRC Operating

Licenses

No.

DPR-58

and DPR-74,

and to the discussion

of our findings with A. A. Blind and others

of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

The enclosed

copy of our inspection report identifies areas

examined

during

the inspection.

Within these

areas,

the inspection

consisted

of a selective

examination of procedures

and representative

records,

observations,

and

interviews with personnel.

During the inspection,

one item was identified which appeared

to be in

violation of NRC requirements.

The inspection

showed that actions

are being

taken to correct the identified violation and prevent recurrence.

Consequently,

we have exercised

the discretion provided for under the

NRC

Enforcement Policy.

Because

we want to encourage

prompt self-identification

and correction of problems,

and because

the criteria specified

in 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, Section

Y.G of the Enforcement Policy were satisfied,

the

violation is not being- cited.

In accordance

with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's

regulations,

a copy of

this letter and the enclosure will be placed in the

NRC Public Document

Room.

We will gladly discuss

any questions

you have concerning this inspection.

Sincere ly,

Enclosure:

1. Inspection

Reports

No. 50-315/91022(DRP);

No. 50-316/91022(DRP)

Brent Clay on, Chief

Reactor Projects

Branch

2

See Attached Distribution

4e

Indiana michigan

Power Company

Distribution

cc w/enclosure:

A. A. Blind, Plant t1anager

DCD/DCB (RIDS)

OC/LFDCB

Resident

Inspector, RIII

James

R. Padgett,

Michigan Public

Service

Commission

EIS Coordinator,

USEPA

Region

5 Office

Michigan Department of

Public Health

D. C. Cook,

LPN,

NRR