ML17328A847

Forwards Insp Rept 50-315/90-24 & 50-316/90-24 on 901203-07. No Violations Noted

ML17328A847
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	01/08/1991
From:	Martin T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Alexich M INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
Shared Package
ML17328A848	List: IR 05000315/1990024 ML17328A847
References
NUDOCS 9101150016
Download: ML17328A847 (5)

See also: IR 05000315/1990024

Text

AN 8

l991

Docket No. 50-315/'Pp'rI

Docket No. 50-316

Indiana Michigan Power

Company

ATTN: Mr. Milton P. Alexich

Vice President

Nuclear Operations Division

1 Riverside Plaza

Columbus,

OH

43216

Gentlemen:

This letter refers to .the follow up maintenance

team inspection conducted

by

Mr. Z. Falevits

and others of this office on December

3-7,

1990.

This

inspection covered activities at the Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Plant authorized

by NRC Operating Licenses

No.

DPR-58 and No. DPR-74.

The purpose of the

inspection

was to evaluate

progress

in the area of maintenance

since the

maintenance

team inspection

(MTI) that was conducted in December

1989.

The

inspection findings were discussed

with Mr. A. Blind and others of your staff

on December

7,

1990.

The enclosed

copy of our inspection report identifies the areas

examined

during the inspection.

Within these

areas,

the inspection consisted of a

selective

examination of work packages,

procedures,

and representative

records;

in addition, observations

were

made

and interviews were conducted

with your personnel.

During the previously conducted

MTI, the inspectors identified that the areas

in most need of improvement were management

involvement and support of

maintenance,

preventive maintenance

programs,

work control, material

condition, technical support,

and procedures.

During this follow up

inspection,

the

team determined that your actions in response

to the

weaknesses

identified during the'TI were generally good.

Specifically,

the

team noted increased plant and senior management

involvement in the

maintenance

process

which had resulted in the development of a number of

maintenance

improvement programs.

Due to your decision to implement

some of

these

improvements in a slow and deliberate

manner,

we were unable to evaluate

the effectiveness

of a number of the more significant improvements

and timely

positive results of the implementation of these

improvements

were not

obtained.

No violations of NRC requirements

were identified during the course of this

inspection.

In accordance

with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations,

a copy of

this letter and the enclosed

inspection report will be placed in the

NRC

Public Document

Room.

9101150016 .910108

PDR

ADOCK 05000315

G

PDf<

l

Indiana Michigan Power

Company

gZN

S

ASSI

We will gladly discuss

any questions

you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

'C

".

4

-(

Enclosure:

Inspection

Reports

No. 50-315/90024(DRS);

No. 50-316/90024(DRS)

cc w/enclosure:

A.

AD Blind, Plant Manager

DCD/DCB (RIDS)

OC/LFDCB

Resident

Inspector,

RIII

James

R. Padgett,

Michigan Public

Service

Commission

EIS Coordinator,

USEPA

Region

5 Office

Michigan Department of

Public Health

D,

C.

Cook,

LPH,

NRR

Commissioner Curtiss,

OCM/JC

Directors/Division of Reactor Safety

RI, RII, RIV,

RV

T. 0. Martin, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

I

alevi s/lc

12/z7/90

~RI~

Walker

~ /9(

) "t

o

enson

Ring

12/ 5/90

kRfj /9f

I/9

P(g

RIII

Wright

34~~8=

v'~/~i

C,~

Hartin

%~6-

Iliki

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0

Principal Persons

Contacted

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

3

2.0

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings

3

3.0

Inspection Results

~

~

~

4

3.1

Inspection

Purpose

and Method

~

~

~

4

3.2

Review of Plant Operations Historic Data

3.3

Management

Philosophy,

Organization

and Administration

Maintenance Activities

of

~

3.3.1

Maintenance

Philosophy

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

4

3.3.2

Management

Organization

and Administration

5

3.3.3

4

Preventive

Maintenance

Program

6

3.3.4

Equipment Identification

3.3.5

Conduct Performance

Measurement

7

3.4

3.4.1

Technical Support

Engineering Support

~

~

~

7

3.4.2

System Engineering

~ g

~

8

3'.3

Maintenance

Engineering

3'.4

Maintenance

Trending

.

8

3.5

Ongoing Maintenance

3.5.1

Ongoing Electrical Maintenance

3'.2

Ongoing Mechanical Maintenance

3.5.3

Ongoing I&C Maintenance

9

ll

12

3.6

Post Maintenance

Testing

12

3.7

QC/QA Involvement

I

3.7.1

QC Involvement in Maintenance

~

~

~

~

~

12

12

3.7.2

QA Audits and Surveillances

13

'xitMeeting

3.7.3

QA Plant/Corporate

In'terface

13

14