ML17328A210

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-315/89-25 & 50-316/89-25.Corrective Actions:Failed Silicon Controlled Rectifier (SCR 209) Returned to Solidstate Controls on 890818
ML17328A210
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 10/25/1989
From: Alexich M
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To: Davis A
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
AEP:NRC:1090J, NUDOCS 8911010157
Download: ML17328A210 (8)


Text

ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTPA.TION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

~

~

~

CESSION NBR: 8911010157 DOC. DATE: 89/10/25 NOTARIZED:

NO DOCKET g

CIL:50-315 Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit, 1, Indiana 05000315 50-316 Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana 05000316 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION ALEXICH,M.P.

Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly'Indiana

& Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DAVIS,A.B.

Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Responds to violations noted in Insp Repts 50-315/89-25 50-316/89-25

'ISTRIBUTION CODE'E01D COPIES RECEIVED'LTR ENCL L

SXZE TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response NOTES:

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 PD INTERNAL: AEOD AEOD/TPAD NRR SHANKMAN,S NRR/DLPQ/PEB NRR/DREP/EPB 10 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 OE LEEBERNAN,J EG~E 0~

RGN3 FILE 01 EXTERNAL: LPDR NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

.1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

-1 1

1 1

1 1

1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME GXITTER,J.

AEOD/DEIIB DEDRO NRR/DEST DXR NRR/DOEA DIR ll NRR/DREP/RPB 10 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS1 RES MORISSEAU,D NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 1

"1 1

1 1

1 1

1 2

2 1

1 1

1 1

1 NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM P 1-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAMEFROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR 23 ENCL 23

indiana Michigan Power Company P,O. Box 16631 Columbus, OH 43216 INDIANA NICHIGAN POWER AEP 'RC "1090J Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2

Docket Nos.

50-315 and 50-316 License Nos.'PR-58 and DPR-74 INSPECTION REPORTS 50-315/89025(DRS)

AND 50-316/89025(DRS);

SPECIAL SAFETY INSPECTION BY NRC AUGMENTED INSPECTION TEAM (AIT) AUGUST 15 THROUGH 18, 1989 U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:

Document Control Desk Washington, D.

C.

20555 Attn:

A. B. Davis October 25, 1989

Dear,

Mr. Davis:

The purpose of this letter is to respond to the Inspection Reports 50-315/89025 and 50-316/89025.

Although the augmented inspection team (AIT) did not identify any violations of NRC requirements during the course of the inspection, we were requested to provide additional information.

Our response to the four issues identified. in Item 9 of the inspection report are as follows.

9, (a)

Confirm the failure mode of SCR 209, In this regard, the licensee has retained their contractor (SCI) to confirm the failure mode of the SCR and to determine if the bent pin found on SCR 209 was or was not a contributor to failure.

Response

(a)

The failed silicon controlled rectifier (SCR 209) was returned to Solidstate Controls (SCI) on August 18, 1989 by AEPSC.

SCI has sent the SCR to the manufacturer (International Rectifier) for test and failure analysis.

The manufacturer has stated that the bent pin lead did not contribute to the SCR fai.lure.

SCI has also reviewed the hi.story of similar devices and could not find a record of like failures.

Based on the lack of findings SCI has determined that our SCR failure was of a random mode.

~7 89102'='y110101-,0c~000315 pop ADO~>~

poi 0

Mr.

AD B. Davis AEP:NRC:1090J 9,

(b)

Review the loads supplied by CRIDs I, II, and III to determine if there are other loads which, upon failure of the GRID, would cause a loss of all channels of a indication to the control room operators (such as steam generator wide range level indication with failure of GRID IV).

Response

(b)

On August 14, 1989, failure of a Silicon Controlled Rectifier in Unit 2 GRID IV static transfer switch resulted in the loss of all four (4) Unit 2 steam generator wide range level indicators.

All four (4) process indicating loops had been powered from the same GRID.

With the loss of GRID IV all steam generator wide range level indication was lost.

A design change is underway to remedy this situation.

In order to determine if there were any other Control Room indicators performing the same function and powered from one GRID (as exampled above), a'design study was

, conducted on all CRIDs from both Units 1 and 2.

The study concluded that only the steam generator wide range level indicators were in this configuration.

No further design changes are expected.

9.

(c)

Determine the feasibility of a preventive maintenance/

surveillance procedure to check the operation of the static switch and its power supplies prior to transfer from the alternate to normal power supply subsequent to an automatic transfer from normal to alternate.

If such a test is feasible, the licensee will also consider incorporating this test into a periodic test possibly performed every refueling outage'esponse (c)

Engineering guidelines for testing GRID Inverters following transfer to alternate source were provided to the plant

~

Based on these data, plant I6C has developed a step-by-step signoff/verification draft procedure for checking the 7.5 KVA inverter prior to switching back from alternate source to normal power supply. If necessary the draft procedure will be used to check operation of the Static Transfer Switch subsequent to automatic transfer from normal to alternate at Unit-power.

The procedure will be finalized and approved by November 15, 1989.

Mr. A. B. Davis AEP: NRC: 1090 J Preventive Maintenance (PM) Cards currently specify a check of "output voltages,

currents, and frequencies-"

for the GRID inverters during refuel outage (Item ¹2).

That PM Card has been expanded to include a check during refuel outage of the Static Transfer Switch output voltage with the push button in the "alternate to load" position.

9.

(d)

In addition to the above, the following items will be reviewed in a subsequent inspection to determine if the licensee's corrective actions to these items are acceptable to Region III and meet appropriate regulatory requirements:

(1)

Guidance and/or training provided by the lic'ensee to plant operators regarding the use of the AMSAC system.

(2)

The maintenance program and the training to maintenance mechanics with regard to the maintenance activities performed on check valve FW

103,

Response

(d)(1)

The lesson plan on AMSAC (RQ-C-1474) has been upgraded to include the fact that the AMSAC and the turbine solenoid trip utilize the same mechanism.

System operation and circuitry are also provided in this lesson plan.

Procedural guidance for manual activation of the system is not provided.

The system was and is intended to be an automatic system.

Operators are trained on the initiating sequences and setpoints.

In the event an auto actuation did not occur, but was challenged, it is the responsibility of the reactor operator to manually actuate the system, This guidance is generic when any safeguard system setpoint is challenged but does not auto actuate.

Therefore no specific,procedural guidance is deemed necessary.

As an interim training measure, an Operating Memo as well as a design change summary were issued immediately to inform operators of the operation of the AMSAC system until the aforementioned lesson plan was revised.

Mr. A. B. Davis AEP: NRC; 1090 J Additional, training on the plant specific simulator will also be provided following the annual simulator upgrade estimated for completion on October 1, 1990.

Currently the controls associated with the AMSAC system are not resident on the simulator, (d)(2)

Feedwater system check valves FW-103E and FW-103W are included in the check valve PM Inspection Program established in response to INPO SOER 86-03, "Check Valve Failure or Degradation."

The exact cause for the bushing failure in the power assist portion of the FW-103W is not known.

We have reviewed our lesson plan for check valve repair,

however, and believe the lesson plan is adequate.

This document has been prepared following Corporate procedures that incorporate a reasonable set of controls to ensure its accuracy and completeness prior to signature by, the undersigned.

Sincerely, M. P.

A exich Vice President MPA/eh

Mr. A. B, Davis AEP:NRC: 1090J CC:

D. H. Williams, Jr.

A. A. Blind - Bridgman R.

C. Callen G. Charnoff NFEM Section Chief T. E. Murley NRC Resident Inspector,-

Bridgman

Cl