ML17328A073
| ML17328A073 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 07/13/1989 |
| From: | Alexich M INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| To: | Davis A NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| AEP:NRC:0752A, AEP:NRC:752A, NUDOCS 8907190033 | |
| Download: ML17328A073 (5) | |
Text
REGULATORY,INFORMATXON DXSTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
SION NBR:8907190033 DOC.DATE: 89/07/13 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET N
L:50-315 Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana 05000315 50-316 Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Xndiana 05000316 AUTH.NAME
'UTHOR AFFI'LIATION ALEXICH',M.P.
Indiana Michigan Power Co; (formeg1y:.Indiana-.$ "Mi,chigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECXPIENT AFFILIATI'ON Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)
SUBJECT:
Informs of changes in i'mplementation of commitments in util 830124 response to Insp Repts 50-315/82-17
& 316/82-17.
D DISTRIBUTION CODE:
ZEOZD COPIES RECEIVED:LTR l ENCL ~
SIZE:
'S TITLE:. General-."(50 Dkt)..Insp. Rept/Notice. of Via%ation Response-, -,.
~,
p
~
~
~
~
NOTES:
C a > tt~+~
RECIPXENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1,PD XNTERNAL: AEOD AEOD/TPAD NRR SHANKMAN,S NRR/DLPQ/PEB NRR/DREP/EPB 10 NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 OE LIEBERMAN,J LE 02 GN9~ LE 01 EX'NAL: 'LPDR NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 1
1 11'.
1 RECIPIENT ID'CODE/NAME STANG,J AEOD/DEIIB DEDRO NRR/DEST DIR NRR/DOEA DIR 11 NRR/DREP/RPB 10 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS1 RES MORISSEAUgD NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 2
1 1
1 h
D D
S S
NOZE TO ALL RXDS" BECZPGMS:
PLEASE HELP US IO REIXXR %APZE!
(XNZACT 'IHE DOglMEÃZ CXWZFGL DESK, LZSTS HXR DOCUMENXS KRJ DONPT NEED!
AL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUlRED:
LTTR 23 ENCL
- 4r indiana Micbigan Power Company P.O. Box 16631 Columbus, OH 43216 INDIANA NlCHIGAN POWER AEP
- NRC'0752A
'onald C.
Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2
Docket Nos.
50-315 and 50-316 License Nos.
DPR-58 and DPR-74 IEIR NOS. 50-315/82-17; 50-316/82-17 STATUS UPDATE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.
20555 Attn: A. B. Davis July 13, 1989
Dear Mr. Davis:
The purpose of this letter is to inform you of changes in our implementation of certain commitments made in our original. response to the subject inspection report, which was sent to the Performance Appraisal Section, Office of Inspection and Enforcement on January 24, 1983.
Several actions were implemented that were appropriate at the time but have since become unnecessary or superseded by other programs.
Below are the specific commitments being addressed and a description of how they are now being implemented.
Commitment "PMI-1040 (Plant Nuclear Safety Review Committee, PNSRC) will be modified to reflect the requirements for review of Quality Assurance (QA) and Nuclear Safety and Design Review committee (NSDRC) audit reports as well as NRC Inspection Reports (which contain citations for Technical Specification violations) and the licensee's responses thereto.
The PNSRC will also review NSDRC meeting minutes, NSDRC reports...."
~Chan e
Our improved Corrective Action Program (PMI-7030, Condition Reports and Plant Reporting) requires that a problem report be generated on all QA and NSDRC audit findings and NRC inspection report violations.
All problem reports are reviewed by the "Problem Assessment Group."
Significant audit findings and NRC inspection report violations are classified as "Significant Problem Reports" and require PNSRC review of the event investigation and the corrective action.
8907190033 890713 PDR ADOCK 05000315 9
A. B. Davis AEP:NRC:0752A Obligations to review audits performed by QA or the
- NSDRC, as discussed in ANSI N18.7-1976, are fulfilledby the NSDRC Subcommittee on Audits.
Therefore, any additional review of these audits by PNSRC would be unnecessarily redundant.
PNSRC review of NSDRC meeting minutes and NSDRC reports will be discontinued.
Formal review of these documents by the PNSRC is unnecessarily burdensome, and the documents are being reviewed by appropriate management personnel outside of the PNSRC arena.
Commitment
"...the PNSRC will also review...reports on training programs for licensed and non-licensed personnel...."
~Chan e
Training activities at Cook Nuclear Plant have undergone significant improvements since the Performance Appraisal Inspection.
Training programs in ten key areas have been formalized, structured, and recognized by INPO through the accreditation process.
The effectiveness of this training is evaluated regularly in order to ensure that accreditation status is maintained, This formal evaluation process results in a comprehensive Accreditation Self Evaluation Report that is submitted to INPO at four-year intervals in order to renew the training program accreditation status.
The utility's ability to perform regular programmatic evaluations, identify deficiencies, and implement corrective action is the cornerstone for maintaining accreditation.
Additionally, INPO
~performs an annual plant performance evaluation.
The evaluation includes an assessment of how well the plant continues to meet the accreditation objectives.
The formalization of training activities at Cook Nuclear Plant, along with the resultant INPO accreditation and the inherent evaluation'criteria associated with that process, we believe, negates the need to produce an annual training summary for the PNSRC.
This document has been prepared following Corporate procedures that incorporate a reasonable set of controls to ensure its accuracy and completeness prior to signature by the undersigned.
Sincerely, M.
. A exich Vice President ldp
Mr. A. B. Davis AEP: NRC: 0752A cc:
D. H. Williams, Jr.
W.
G. Smith, Jr.
- Bridgman R.
C. Callen G. Charnoff NFEM Section Chief NRC Resident Inspector
- Bridgman