ML17324A562

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 851209-12
ML17324A562
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 01/22/1986
From: Hind J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML17324A561 List:
References
50-315-85-40, 50-316-85-40, NUDOCS 8601280139
Download: ML17324A562 (2)


Text

NOTICE OF VIOLATION American Electric Power Service Corporation Indiana and Michigan Power Company Docket No. 50-315 Docket No. 50-316 As a result of the inspection conducted on December 9-12,

1985, and in accordance with the "General 'Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the following violation was identified:

Unit 1 and Unit 2 Technical Specification

6. 8. l. a states that written procedures shall be established, implemented,'nd maintained covering among other things, the applicable procedures recommended in Appendix "A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33,
November, 1972.

This requirement is implemented in Procedure 12 THP 6020 LAB.044, "Laboratory equality Assurance,"'(Revision 6, September l2, 1985), that states in part (Section

12. 1):

"A program to assure the reliability of procedural accuracy and individual technician technique will be routinely conducted.

Each relevant procedure will be checked at least quarterly with 'unknowns'."

Contrary to the above requirements, the licensee has not fully implemented this procedure in that:

~

~

~

~

1.

The licensee failed to provide "unknown" samples to check the procedural accuracy in the determination of boron concentrations in reactor systems.

2.

Some technicians have not been checked for performance to assure individual technician technique.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation:

(1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

at 1nd, 0>rector Division of Radiological Safety and Sateguards 860i280i$ 9 S60i22 i

PDR ADOCK 050003is 8

PDR

I 4

h l