ML17321A956

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Proprietary XN-NF-85-64(P), Plant Transient Analysis for DC Cook Unit 2 W/10% Steam Generator Tube Plugging. Rept Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(h))
ML17321A956
Person / Time
Site: Cook 
Issue date: 11/15/1985
From: Copeland R
SIEMENS POWER CORP. (FORMERLY SIEMENS NUCLEAR POWER
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17321A957 List:
References
RAC:070:85, RAC:70:85, NUDOCS 8511190380
Download: ML17321A956 (12)


Text

F

'W

, R&GUEAT'vi<)~~",fFOR'NATION~;DI,SYQIBlJTI'0$;.Se~F4lf (;RIb5),'

!6ii'sdiiFm!!'~'rH!!c&~in'ma~~. '4'i!ii'6~16!!w'ii!"wi-""~~wH"i FACIL:50-316 Donald C,

Cook Nuclear Power Planti Unit ?i Indiana L

05000316 AUTH,NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION COPELANDiReA ~

Exxon Nuclear Co.~

Ines (sub'f Exxon Corp.)

RECIP,NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DENTONgH ~ RE Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulationr Director

SUBJECT:

Forwards proprietary XN NF-85-60(P)i "Plant Transient j

Analysis for DC Cook Unit 2 N/10/ Steam Generator Tube Plugging,"

Rept" withheld (ref 10CFR2,790(h)).

~5K e.&P Lacuna DISTRIBUTION CODE:

PA01D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR J ENCL ~

SIZEe TITLE: Proprietary Review Distribution Operating Reactor NOTES:

OL: 12/23/72 05000316 RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME-LTTR ENCL NRR ORB1 OC ~!! !$

7 7

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME COPIES LTTR ENCL INTERNAL:

FILE EXTERNAL: 24X NRC PDR Z-7 6

6 1

1 0

0 ELD/HPS3 RGN3 +'LS 1

0 1

1 1

0 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR 19 ENCL 15

m~ > q ae'",.~p".:~,:enweb.a~i.'~

~. vw

~

~.,

w "

re","'"y~>

s

~

kW ~~,, s 4g,

. ',~<

~

J ',.g,'%<~

'8

~ t y,

a fi,,

g 1,l l-"$a.~8.'""xk i <..1'Jp P

>l; ="'(~l ~>>:

> <'Ri ~ '>l 5'~ R~ '<

n n

4 I5@GN NUCLEAR COMPANY, INC.

2101 HORN RAPIDS ROAD. PO BOX 130, RICHLAND,VIA99352 1509) 375.8100 TELEX: 15.2878 November 15, 1985 RAC:070:85 Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Plant Unit No.

2 Docket No. 50-316 License No.

DPR-74 TRANSMITTAL OF PLANT TRANSIENT ANALYSES RESULTS IN SUPPORT OF UNIT 2 OPERATION Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

References:

XN-NF-85-64(P),

"Plant Transient Analysis for D.

C.

Cook Unit 2 with 10K Steam Generator Tube Plugging,"

Exxon Nuclear

Company, October 1985.

Dear Mr. Denton:

Enclosed are five copies of the reference Exxon Nuclear Company technical report which supports operation of the D.

C.

Cook Unit 2 nuclear plant.

At the request of American Electric Power Service Company (AEPSC),

this report is being transmitted directly by Exxon Nuclear.

Exxon Nuclear considers the reference topical report to be proprietary.

Enclosed, also, is an affidavit executed by Mr. G.

N.

Ward of Exxon Nuclear needed to support the withholding of the reference topical report from public disclosure as required by the Commission's regulation 10 CFR 2-790(h).

If you have any questions regarding this transmittal, please contact Mr. James G. Feinstein of AEPSC at (614) 233-2040.

0 Sincerely, R. A. Copeland Reload Licensing cc:

Mr. D. L. Wigginton (NRC) (w/att) Airborne Mr. N. Lauben (NRC) (W/att) Airborne Mr. M. P. Alexich (AEPSC) 85iii90380 85iii5 PDR

  • DOCK 050003ib P

PDR ANAFRUATEOF EXXONCORPORATION

~i',

s4 i 4

~

I

E~ON NUCLEAFICOMPANY ~NC 2101 HORN RAP1DS AP1DS ROAD. PD 8OX 130, RICHLAND,V(A99352 (509) 375 81OO TELEXF 152878 November 15, 1985 RAC:070:85 Donald C.

Cook Nuclear P 1 ant Unit No.

2 Docket No. 50-316 License No.

DPR-74 TRANSMITTAL OF PLANT TRANSIENT ANALYSES RESULTS IN SUPPORT OF UNIT 2 OPERATION Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 P

"Plant Transient Analysis for D.

C.

Cook

References:

XN-NF-85-64(P),

an Unit 2 with lOX Steam Generator u e T b Plugging," Exxon Nuclear

Company, October 1985.

Dear Mr. Denton:

of the reference Exxon Nuclear Company of th D

C Cook U 't 2

clear techn>ca eport wh ch suppo s

o r

the re uest of American Electric ower

'tt d directly by Exxon Nuclear.

this report is being transmi e

i reference topical report to be proprietary.

Exxon Nuclear cons>ders the reference op ldin of the reference top)cal report from p is an affidavit executed by Mr. G.

N.

ar o

needed to support the withho i

g o disclosure as required by the Commission's regu a ion al lease contact If you have any ques ion tions regarding this transmitt, p

Mr. James G. Feinstein of AEPSC at (614) 233--2040.

Sincerely, R. A. Copeland Reload Licensing cc:

Mr. D. L. Wigginton (NRC) (w/att) Airborne Mr. N. Lauben

{NRC) {W/att) Airborne Mr. M. P. Alexich (AEPSC)

ANAFAUATEOFEXXONCO4PO4A1ION

AFF IDAVIT STATE OF WASHINGTON

)

)

ss.

COUNTY OF BENTON I,,

G.

N, Ward being duly sworn, hereby say and depose:

1.

I am Manager, Reload Licensing Liaison for Exxon Nuclear

Company, Inc.

("ENC"),

and as such I

am authorized to execute this Affidavit.

2.

I am familiar with ENC's detailed document control system and policies which govern the protection and control of information.

3.

I am familiar with the document XN-NF-85-64(P) entitled "Plant Transient Analysis for D.

C.

Cook Unit 2 with 10 referred to as "Document."

Information contained in this Document has been classified by ENC as proprietary in accordance with the control system and policies established by ENC for the control and protection of information.

4.

The document contains information of a

proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by ENC and not made available to the public.

Based on my experience, I

am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in the Document as proprietary and confidential.

2 5.

The Document has been made available to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in conFidence, with the request that the information contained in the Document will not be disclosed or

divulged, 6.

The Document contains information which is vital to a

competitive advantage of ENC and would be helpful to competitors of ENC when competing with ENC.

7,.

The information contained in the Document is considered to be proprietary by ENC because it reveals certain distinguishing aspects of the Exxon Nuclear plant transient methodology which secure competitive advantage to ENC for fuel design optimization and marketability, an'd includes information utilized by ENC in its business which affords ENC an opportunity to obtain a competitive advantage over its competitors who do not or may not know or use the information contained, in the Document.

8.

The disclosure of the proprietary information contained in the Document to a competitor would permit the competitor to reduce its expenditure of money and manpower and to improve its competitive position by giving it extremely valuable insights into the Exxon Nuclear plant transient methodology and would result in substantial harm to the competitive position of ENC.

9.

The Document contains proprietary information which is held in confidence by ENC and is not available in public sources,

I

< ~

3

/

10.

In accordance with ENC's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in the Document has been made available, on a limited

basis, to others outside ENC only as required and under suitable agreement providing for non-disclosure and limited use of the information.

11.

ENC policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis.

12.

This Document provides information which reveals the Exxon Nuclear plant transient methodology developed by ENC over the past several years.

ENC has invested millions of dollars and many man-years of effort in developing the the Exxon Nuclear plant transient methodology revealed in the Document.

Assuming a

competitor had available, the same background data and incentives as

ENC, the competitor might, at a

minimum, develop the information for the same expenditure of manpower and money as

ENC, 13.

Based on my experience in the industry, I do not believe that the

.background data and incentives of ENC's competitors are sufficiently similar to the corresponding background data and incentives of ENC to reasonably expect such competitors would be in a

position to duplicate ENC's proprietary information contained in the Document.

r I.j~

1

4 THAT the statements made hereinabove are, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, truthful and complete.

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.

SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me "this J5~day of

V br a

I J

y i