ML17321A425

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Priority of Safety Evaluations for Facilities,To Suppl 841218 Request for NRR Demonstration Re Paperwork Backlog.Response Needed to Set Schedule.List of Remaining Open Items at Facilities Encl for Review
ML17321A425
Person / Time
Site: Farley, Cook, 05000000
Issue date: 01/28/1985
From: Varga S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Lear G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8502040332
Download: ML17321A425 (4)


Text

),ILQ January 28, 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR:

George E. Lear, Chief Structural and Geotechnical Engineering Branch Division of Engineering Distribution RC PCR LPDR ORB¹1 RDG Nemo file CParrish KJohnston EReeves DWigginton

SUBJECT:

Please respond on the enclosed listing and return a copy as soon as possible so that we may adjust schedules as necessary.

Your contacts for Farley and D.

C.

Cook are Ed Reeves (X27386) and Dave Wigginton (X27354) respectively.

Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch ¹1 Division of Licensing PRIORITY OF SAFETY EVALUATIONS FOR D.

C.

COOK AND FARLEY By letter dated December 18, 1984, Division of Licensing cmahagement requested, as an NRR demonstration to show that; the backl.og of multi-,plant, TMI, and plant specific actions co'uld be completed in a'timely manner, that six plants, including D.

C.

Cook and Farley, be chosen "to~,complete R75% of their actions, open prior to July 1,'984;" by July 1, 1985.

'To achieve'his goal, it was requested that reviews for thesec plants be--given priority 'over similar reviews for other operating reactors 'unless, there were overriding safety issues.

Enclosed in the memo were the '-1'ists of "open"items for each plant and their completion schedule.

It was requested.,that the, division "

evaluate the dates for actions under their cognizance and advise.us as soon as possible of any schedular impacts or problems that they might have.

At this time we have received few responses to this'equest.

It is necessary that we receive your response so that we can establish schedules that reflect our mutual goals.

lJ R

R R

R Enclosed are the lists of remaining open items, for,reviesi by "your branch for Farley and D.

C.

Cook.

Included on each list i's the "-SE'nput Date" which is the date DL requires your staff's input in order to meet the goal of completing 75% of the open items.

In addition, where requests for additional information (RAI) have been received or are forthcoming from the r'eview

branch, a date is listed in the "RAI Date" column.

If there is a targeted licensee response date it is listed in the "RAI Response Date" column.

Where no dates are shown in these

columns, we are not aware of any forthcoming RAI's or response targets.

Please include in your review, where appropriate, projected dates for RAI's and needed licensee response dates to meet the projected "SER Input Date."

Some of these dates have been negotiated by the PN's, others have not.

8502040332 850}28 t I

PDR ADOCK 050003}5 P

PDR Sincerely,

/s/SAVarga teven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch ¹1 Division of Licensing

Enclosure:

As stated /

ORB¹1: DL KJohnsto /

s 01/ tg/85 ORB¹ :DL DWigginton 01/(q/85 0

¹ 'DL ER es 0/

5 1'DL SVarg 85

C J

II f

d'

/

'w y

i.i Jt d

lt 1

STRUCTURAL AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING BRANCH TAG NO.

TITLE RAI DATE RAI SE

RESPONSE

INPUT DATE DATE D.C.

COOK 1

43072 Structural Analysis of the Containments 8/15/84 2/7/85T 3/1/85 Ultimate Strength D.C.

COOK 2 43071 Structural Analysis of the Containments 8/15/84 2/7/85T 3/1/85 Ultimate Strength