ML17320A986
| ML17320A986 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 04/12/1984 |
| From: | Alexich M INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| AEP:NRC:0773G, AEP:NRC:773G, NUDOCS 8404170324 | |
| Download: ML17320A986 (6) | |
Text
REGULATO INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION TEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NttR:8404170324 DOC+DATE'84/04/12 NOTARIZED; NO DOCKET' FACIL:50~315 Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Power Planti Unit ir Indiana 8
05000315 50 3i6 Donald G, Cook'Nuclear Power Plantr Unit 2r Indiana 8
05000316 AUTH ~ NAME AUTHOR Al'-FILIATION ALEXICH<tl,P, Indiana 8 Michigan Electric Co.
REC IP NAf'1E RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DENTONEH,RE Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulationr
- Director,
SUBJECT:
Forwards Figure 6"2r "Human Engineering Discrepancy Evaluation Flow Charti" for insertion as Pages 6-7 of detailed control room design review/plan, DISTRISUTION CODE:
AOOIS COPIES RECEIVED:LTR fE.NCL"+
SIZE:
g'ITLE:
OR Submittal:
General Distribution NOTES:
EG FIL 04 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRR ORB 1 BC 01 INTERNALR ELD/HDS3 NRR/DL DIR TB COPIES LTTR ENCL 7
1 0
1 1
1 1
1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRR/DE/MTEB NRR/DL/ORAB NRR/DS I/RAB RGN3 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 0
1 1
EXTERNAL; ACRS NRC PDR NTIS 09 02 6
6 1
1 1
1 LPDR NSIC 03 05 2
2 1
1
.TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 26 ENCL 24
w 7
Q,g,)
R '(>I
¹ l rf;r ~~I iR "r>>li"
~P¹W(,R'i i)i ~ )I')W/(wry 1l 8
(>>>>fi f >" l q 4
'S l'0 r
q 0 <rtw R
l "l i()
,g,')
of'O,ga i
R
'lA$ l~)g f'l q>(W()I f 0) i Itl(l << i' g:) 0 p[>
s, ~
li W
R llw¹i w
R i)rw>>w
'"¹I R
)R
>(1 f >
f >> W 'g f
¹ T,,If Rlf R R ll r>>1R '¹>i lrr 3
~
.~R(
r¹ f
II,'~
f I',
'R'(
f kY re I,'ir w r) ~wrfw
~ (<< l, w
A
'~ ill",¹ R
,i ~
y')'l p <<fr'g I¹i)(i g'>>',ir,,) f f I>>g iw ai),,
war ¹ q,'I(~
)W r> qadi, ['f 'j,;[(')tl-V'ilr>i $
, j L¹f>f Vg il i gl't <<V l)'f"II '~ilail I ii g
iaaf) f OI r>,r(R l>V i q( lr i> $ r 'g);tljl g p',)
RI
>iil 'fr",'l 1 fgwrrf3'$
bi(,¹'g >l(ir((i>>3 j "ll f I
> g PL>
wwwotww>>WOclww>r~@lgg~ (rl
>wow>>>>>>WR~t4 R
)r ki t'R
'I i i
i i~ II r('¹rk r rgl((rfr i
+
gr(l II i
IIR Rri R
'R w>Cl>,': l'(-.g 4 r. P
)R l:
1 R R R; i
"I W(JI
)I%i WR j
(
Il 'II i>>I I7i 'lk
)l ii'(),'i4,
'1 I
(
'I'), (~ X( "II'¹(,',
i
('>
I e
II>l II jh:>I I
.>>R
!'Wlk, '
'Rg i(
Ir 01>>
rw fg 0'¹ ll 0
wii i'>
(i, g
INDIANA8 MICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY P.O. BOX 16631 COLUMBUS, OHIO 43216 April 12, 1984 AEP:NRC:0773G Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos.
1 and 2
Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555
Dear Mr. Denton:
Figure 6-2 was inadvertently omitted from our Detailed Control Room Design Review (DCRDR) Plan sent to you on December 29, 1983 (AEP:NRC:0773C).
The Figure 6-2 presents the methodology the Assessment Team will use to evaluate and categorize Human Engineering Discrepancies (HED).
Although the figure may not change the NRC Staff Comments (Reference March 13, 1984 - Varga to Dolan Letter), we believe they should have the opportunity to review the figure prior to our tentatively scheduled meeting on May 8, 1984.
The attached Figure 6-2 is hereby provided for insertion as page 6-7 of our PROGRAM PLAN REPORT for a DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW FOR INDIANA & MICHIGAN ELECTRIC CO.
DONALD CD COCK UNITS 1
& 2.
This letter has been prepared following Corporate procedures which incorporate a reasonable set of controls to insure its accuracy and completeness prior to signature by the undersigned.
Very truly yours, MPA/cm M. P. Xlexich
'~<+> O'I Vice President cc:
John E. Dolan W. G. Smith, Jr.
Bridgman R. C. Callen G. Charnoff E. R. Swanson, NRC Resident Inspector Bridgman
'8404i70324 840412 ~
PDR ADOCZ OS0003i5 I
'DR~
h
'h
DESIGN REVIEW TEAM CHECKLIST OBSERVATIONS FORMS IREASSESSMENTI ASSESSMENT TEAM HUMANENGINEERING DISCREPANCIES EVALUATEFOR SAFETYCONSEQUENCE YES NO YES HIGH PROBABILITY OF OPERATIONAL ERROR/SIGNIFICANT DEVIATION NO CATEGORY 2 REFER TO FIGURE 6-3 ASSESS FOR SIGNIFICANT OPERATIONAL IMPACTS YES CATEGORY 3 REFER TO FIGURE 6 3 NO NO SIGNIFICANT COSTVERSUS OPERATOR BENEFIT CATEGORY 1 REFER TO FIGURE 6 3 IDENTIFY CORRECTIONS AND COSTS TO FIX YES SELECT RECOMMENDED BACKFIT ASSESS FOR NEW DEPARTURES FROM PRELIMINARY CRHEC REPORT DOCUMENT AND PREPARE FOR IMPLEMENTATION CATEGORY 4 DOCUMENT REFER TO FIGURE 6 3 Flguce 6-2.
Hvnan Englneerlng Discrepancy Evaluation Flow Chart 6 7
- f
,1