RS-17-126, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 & 2, Revision 14 to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Chapter 11, Radioactive Waste Management
Text
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR 11.1-1 CHAPTER 11.0 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT Radioactive waste systems are designed to collect, process, control and dispose of radioactive waste in a safe manner without limiting unit or station operations or availability. Equipment, instrumentation, and operating proced ures are provided to assure that the discharge of radioactive wa stes will not exceed the limits as set forth in 10 CFR 20 (now also 10 CFR 50, Appendix I).
[11.1-1]
The performance objectives of the radioactive waste systems are:
A. To provide effective control of pr ocesses to prevent the release of radioactive materials in excess of limits prescribed in 10 CFR 20 (Now also 10 CFR 50, Appendix I);
B. To minimize the radioactive waste release to the environs;
C. To provide sufficient time for operat or decision and action in the event of off-standard conditions; and
D. To minimize the radiation hazards to the station personnel and the public.
Radioactive wastes resulting from station op eration are classified liquid, gaseous and solid wastes. The following descriptions pert ain to radioactive wastes as used herein:
A. Gaseous Radioactive Wastes
Airborne particulates, gases vente d from process equipment, and under certain conditions, the building ventilati on exhaust air, are considered as gaseous radioactive waste. The major source of gaseous radioactive waste (condenser air ejector effluent) is cont inuously decayed and filtered during operation and monitored to ensure th at release limits of 10 CFR 20 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix I are not exceeded.
B. Liquid Radioactive Waste
[11.1-2]
Liquids from the reactor process sy stems, or liquids which have become contaminated with these process syst em liquids are considered liquid radioactive waste. The liquid radioa ctive wastes are processed according to their purity (essentially conductivity, organic content, and activity level)
before being returned to the plant as condensate, sent to the diffuser pipe, sent to the discharge bay, or reprocessed through the radioactive waste
system for further purification.
C. Solid Radioactive Waste
[11.1-3]
Solids recovered from the reactor process system, solids in contact with reactor process system liquids or ga ses, and solids used in the reactor process system operation are considered solid radioactive waste. The solid radioactive wastes are processed and put into drums, liners, high-integrity containers, bins, or boxes for stor age onsite or disposal offsite.
The system's components are designed and op erated in such a manner as to minimize radiation exposure of personnel, as well as to significantly reduce the radioactivity levels QUAD CITIES - UFSAR 11.1-2 below those limits set forth in 10 CFR 20 and the regulations of the states of Illinois and Iowa. The process control program (P CP) contains the approved methods for handling solid radioactive wastes.
By virtue of location, nonradioactive liqui d wastes are kept separate from controlled access areas. These wastes are dischar ged by conventional means.
11.1 Source Terms The basis selected for the design capacity of the liquid, gaseous, and solid radioactive waste management systems is the design basis activity concentration of 4.5
µCi/cc of corrosion and fission products present in the reactor coolant. The corrosion and fission product input quantities are reduced in processing through the radioactive liquid and gaseous systems. The reduced va lues then become the estimated quantities of radionuclides disposed offsite as solids or released to the environment. Further details of the liquid, gaseous, and solid waste management systems are presented in Sections 11.2, 11.3, an d 11.4, respectively.
[11.1-4]
This section discusses the sources of radi onuclides and the amount of those radioactive materials produced in the reactor system.
11.1.1 Source of Radioactive Nuclides Sources of radioactive nuclides in the reac tor coolant system consist of fission products from a fuel cladding failure, radioactivated corrosion products, and radioactivated products in the coolant.
[11.1-5]
Radioactive fission product nuclides arise from minor amounts of "tramp" uranium on the surface of the fuel cladding and from either imperfections or perforations which might develop in the fuel cladding. The principal radioactive fission product nuclides in the reactor coolant are listed in Table 11.1-1.
[11.1-6] Certain elements present in the reactor cool ant are activated upon exposure in the reactor core. The principal activated produc ts in the reactor coolant stream are listed in Table 11.1.2.
[11.1-7]
11.1.2 Radioactive Nuclide Concentrations Estimated concentrations of the fission pr oduct, activation product, and corrosion product radioactive nuclides are tabulated in Table 11.1-1 and Table 11.1-2.
[11.1-8]
11.1.3 Mathematical Model and Parameters
This section discusses the mathematical equations and parameters used both in
obtaining the source terms used as a basis for sizing and design of the radioactive waste management systems.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR 11.1-3 The design basis numbers used for the Quad Cities Station are based on the diffusion model and an off-gas rate of 200,000 µCi/s.
A design basis activity concentration of 4.5 µCi/cc of corrosion and fission products was applied in the Quad Cities design.
The reactor design and operating parameters used to arrive at the fission product and activated product concentrations are listed in Table 11.1-3.
[11.1-9]
11.1.3.1 Noble Radiogas Fission Products The noble radiogas fission product sour ce terms observed in operating BWRs are generally complex mixtures with sources varyin g from minuscule defects in cladding to "tramp" uranium on external cladding surfaces. The relative concentrations or amounts of noble radiogas isotop es can be described as follows:
[11.1-10] The nomenclature in Subsection 11.1.3.4 defines the terms in these and succeeding equations. The constants k
{1} and k{2} describe the fractions of the total fissions that are involved in each of the releases. Th e equilibrium and recoil mixtures are the two extremes of the mixture spectrum that are phys ically possible. When a sufficient time delay occurs between the fission event and the release time of the radiogases from the
fuel to the coolant, the radiogases approach equilibrium levels in the fuel and the
equilibrium mixture results. When there is no delay or impedance between the fission event and the release of radiogases, the recoil mixture is observed.
It was assumed that noble radiogas leakag e from the fuel would be the equilibrium mixture of the noble radiogases present in the fuel.
The intermediate decay mixture was termed the "diffusion" mixture. It must be emphasized that this "diffusion" mixture is merely one possible point on the mixture spectrum,ranging from the equilibrium to the recoil mixture, and does not have the absolute mathematical and mechanistic ba sis for the possible calculational methods for equilibrium and recoil mixtures. How ever, the "diffusion" distribution pattern which has been describ ed, is as follows:
The constant k
{3} describes the fraction of total fission s that are involved in the release. The value of the exponent of the decay constant, lambda, midway between the values for equilibrium, 0, and recoil.
Though the previously described "diffusion" mixture was used by GE as a basis for design since 1963, the design basis release magnitude used has varied from 0.5 Ci/s to 0.1 Ci/s as measured after a 30-minute decay (t = 30 min.). The noble radiogas source-term rate after a 30-minute decay wa s used as the conventional measure for the design basis fuel leakage rate since it is conveniently measurable and was consistent with the nominal design basis 30 minutes of gas holdup system used on a number of plants.
Y k_R : m Equilibriu 1 g (11.1-1) Y k_R : Recoil 2 g (11.1-2) 0.5 3 g Y k_R : Diffusion (11.1-3)
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR 11.1-4 11.1.3.2 Radiohalogen Fission Products
Historically, the radiohalogen design basi s source term was established by the same equation used for noble radiogases. In a fashion similar to that used with gases, a simplified equation can be shown to descr ibe the leakage rate of each halogen radioisotope:
The constant, K
{h}, describes the magnitude of leakage from fuel. The relative rates of halogen radioisotope leakage is expressed in terms of n, the exponent of the decay constant, lambda. As was done with the noble radiogases, the average value was determined for n. The value for n is 0.5 with a standard deviation of +-0.19.
11.1.3.3 Other Fission Products
The observations of the fission products (a nd transuranic nuclides, including Np-239) in operating BWRs are not adequately co rrelated by simple equations. For these radioisotopes, design basis concentratio ns in reactor water have been estimated conservatively. Carryover of these radioisoto pes from the reactor water in the steam is estimated to be <0.1% (<0.001 fraction). In addition to carryover, however, decay of noble radiogases in the steam leaving the reac tor will result in production of noble gas daughter radioisotopes in the st eam and condensate systems.
11.1.3.4 Nomenclature
The following list of nomenclature defines th e terms used in equations for source-term calculations:
R g = leakage rate of noble gas radioisotope (µCi/s)
R h = leakage rate of halogen radioisotope (µCi/s) Y = fission yield of a radioisotope (atoms/fission) lambda = decay constant of a radioisotope (s
-1) n = radiohalogen decay constant exponent (dimensionless)
K g = a constant establishing the level of noble radiogas leakage from fuel K h = a constant establishing the level of radiohalogen leakage from fuel
11.1.3.5 Coolant Activation Products The coolant activation products are not adeq uately correlated by simple equations.
Design basis concentrations in reactor water and steam and have been estimated conservatively.
[11.1-11] n h h Y K = R (11.1-4)
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR 11.1-5 11.1.3.6 Noncoolant Activation Products
The activation products formed by activation of impurities in the coolant, or by
corrosion of irradiated system materials, are not adequately correlated by simple equations. The design basis source terms of noncoolant activation products have been estimated conservatively. Carryover of th ese isotopes from the reactor water to the steam is estimated to be <0.1% (<0.001 fraction).
11.1.3.7 Tritium
In a BWR, tritium is produced by three principal methods:
- 1. Activation of naturally occurri ng deuterium in the primary coolant;
- 2. Nuclear fission of UO
{2} fuel; and
- 3. Neutron reactions with boron used in reactivity control rods.
The tritium, formed in control rods (which may be released from a BWR in liquid or gaseous effluents), is believed to be negligib le. Activation of deuterium in the primary coolant is a prime source of tritium availabl e for release from a BWR. Some fission product tritium may also transfer from fuel to primary coolant. This discussion is limited to the uncertainties associated with estimating the amounts of tritium generated in a BWR which are available for release.
All of the tritium produced by activation of deuterium in the primary coolant is available for release in liquid or gaseous effluents. The tritium formed in BWR can be calculated using the equation:
where R act = tritium formation rate by de uterium activation (µCi/s/MWt) SIGMA = macroscopic thermal neutron cross section (cm
-1) phi = thermal neutron flux (neutrons/(cm 2)(s)) V = coolant volume in core (cm
- 3) lambda = tritium radioactive decay constant (1.78 x 10
-9 s-1) P = reactor power level (MWt)
The fraction of tritium produced by fission which may transfer from fuel to the coolant (which will then be available for release in liquid and gaseous effluents) is much more difficult to estimate. However, since zirc aloy-clad fuel rods are used in BWRs, essentially all fission product tritium will re main in the fuel rods unless defects are present in the cladding material.
The study made at Dresden Unit 1 in 1968 by the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) suggests that essentially all of the tritium re leased from the plant could be accounted for P 10 x 3.7 V = R 4 act (11.1-5)
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR 11.1-6 by the deuterium activation source. For pu rposes of estimating the leakage of tritium from defective fuel, it can be assumed that it leaks in a manner similar to the leakage of noble radiogases.
Thus, one can use the empirical relationship described as the "diffusion mixture" when predicting the source term of individual no ble gas radioisotopes as a function of the total noble gas source term. The equation which describes this relationship is:
where R{dif} = leakage rate of tritium from fuel (µCi/s) Y = fission yield fraction (atoms/fission) lambda = radioactive decay constant (s
-1) K = a constant related to total tritium leakage rate
Tritium formed in the reactor is generally present as tritiated oxide (HTO) and to a less degree as tritiated gas (HT). Tritium concen tration in the steam formed in the reactor will be the same as in the reactor water at any given time. This tritium concentration will also be present in condensate and feedwa ter. Since radioactive effluents generally originate from the reactor and power cycle equipment, radioactive effluents will also have this tritium concentration. Condensa te storage receives treated water from the radioactive waste system and reject water from the condensate system. Thus, all plant
process water will have a common tritium concentration.
Off-gases released from the plant will contain tritium, which is present as tritiated gas (HT) resulting from reactor water radiolysis as well as tritiated water vapor (HTO). In addition, water vapor from the turbine gl and seal steam packaging exhauster, and a less amount present in ventilation air (due to process steam leaks or evaporation from the sumps, tanks, and spills, and floors), will also contain tritium. The remainder of the tritium will leave the plant in liquid effluents or with solid wastes.
Recombination of radiolysis gases in the ai r ejector off-gas system will form water, which is condensed and returned to the main condenser. This tends to reduce the amount of tritium leaving in gaseous efflue nts. Reducing the gaseous tritium release will result in a slightly higher tritium concentration in the plant process water.
Reducing the amount of liquid effluent disch arged will also result in a higher process coolant equilibrium tritium concentration.
Essentially, all tritium entering the primary coolant will eventually be released to the environs, either as water vapor and gas to the atmosphere, a liquid effluent to the plant discharge, or as solid waste. Reductio n due to radioactive decay is negligible due to the 12-year half-life of tritium.
The USPHS study at Dresden Unit 1 estimated that approximately 90% of the tritium released was observed in liquid effluent, wi th the remaining 10% leaving as gaseous effluent. Efforts to reduce the volume of liquid effluent discharges may change this distribution so that a greater amount of tr itium will leave as gaseous effluent. From a practical standpoint, the fraction of tritium leaving as liquid effluent may vary between 5 and 15% with the remainder leaving in the gaseous effluent.
0.5 dif KY = R (11.1-6)
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR 11.1-7 11.1.4 Fuel Fission Product Inventory
Fuel fission product inventory information is used in establishing fission product source terms for accident analysis and is, therefore, addressed in Chapter 15.
11.1.5 Process Leakage Sources
Process leakage results in potential relea se paths for noble gases and other volatile fission products via ventilation systems.
Liquid from process leaks are collected and routed to the liquid-solid radwaste system.
Radionuclide releases via ventilation paths are at extremely low levels and have been insignificant compared to process off-gas releases from operating BWR plants.
Leakage of fluids from the process system will result in the release of radionuclides into plant buildings. In general, the nobl e radiogases will remain airborne and will be released to the atmosphere with little dela y via the building ventilation exhaust ducts. The radionuclides will partition between air and water, and airborne radioiodines may "plateout" on metal surfaces, concrete, and pa int. A significant amount of radioiodine remains in the air or is desorbed from surf aces. Radioiodines are found in ventilation air as methyl iodide and as inorganic iodine which is defined here as particulate, elemental, and hypoidodus acid forms of io dine. Particulates will also be present in the ventilation exhaust air.
An evaluation of the radioactive releases from ventilation systems, for compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I and 10 CFR 20, is given in Section 11.3.
11.1.6 Other Releases
All other releases are covered in Section 11.2.
11.1.7 Radioactivity Sources for Ventilation Systems The potential for radioactivity sources for the ventilation system are from the following systems: [11.1-12]
A. Drywell equipment drain sump system,
B. Reactor building equipment drain tank system,
C. Radwaste building equipment drain sump system,
D. Turbine building equipment drain sump system,
E. Drywell floor drain sumps system, QUAD CITIES - UFSAR 11.1-8 F. Reactor building floor drain sumps system,
G. Radwaste building floor drain sumps system, and
H. Turbine building floor drain sumps system.
The quantity of potential liquid leakage or drainage and the point source are identified in Tables 11.1-4, 11.1-5, 11.
1-6, 11.1-7, 11.1-8, 11.1-9, 11.1-10, 11.1-11. Any dissolved radioactive gases will come to equilibrium between the liquid and
compartment atmosphere and provide the sour ce of any radioactivity in the ventilation systems during normal plant operation.
11.1.8 Sources Not Normally Part of th e Radioactive Waste Management Systems
There are two site release points for gaseous effluent: the ventilation chimney and the reactor building vent stack. There are no re lease points for gaseous effluent that are not a part of the radioactive waste management system.
There are three site release points for liq uid effluent, spray canal blowdown, south diffuser pipe, and the discharge bay. There are no release points for liquid effluent
that are not a part of the radioactive waste management system.
Radiation monitors continuous ly monitor the gaseous and liquid discharge stream and alert the control room operator in case th e effluent stream exceeds the predetermined level of radioactivity.
The estimated quantity of tritium in the e ffluent stream discharged to the environment is discussed in subsection 11.1.3.7.
(Sheet 1 of 1)
Revision 8, October 2005 QUAD CITIES UFSAR
Table 11.1-1**
REACTOR WATER FISSION PRODUCTS (Based on 200,000 µCi/s - 30 Minute Holdup Time)
Isotope Half-Life Concentration
(µCi/cc)*
I-131 8.05 days 1.3 x 10
-1 I-132 2.3 hr. 6.8 x 10
-1 I-133 21 hr. 7.6 x 10
-1 I-134 52 min. 9.4 x 10
-1 I-135 6.7 hr. 9.1 x 10
-1 I-136 86 sec. 7.7 x 10
-2 I-137 22 sec. 6.2 x 10
-2 I-138 5.9 sec. 2.2 x 10
-2 Br-83 2.3 hr. 7.4 x 10
-2 Br-84 32 min. 1.1 x 10
-1 Br-85 3 min. 5.4 x 10
-2 Br-87 56 sec. 5.5 x 10
-2 Br-88 16 sec. 3.2 x 10
-2 Tc-m99 6.04 hr. 9.5 x 10
-2 Mo-Tc-99m 2.78 days 4.5 x 10
-1 Total 4.5 µCi/cc
- Concentrations per plant
- The values noted in this table represent design basis concentrations and remain valid for core uprate to 2957 MWt.
(Sheet 1 of 2)
Revision 8, October 2005 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.1-2*
CONCENTRATIONS OF ACTIVATION PRODUCTS IN REACTOR WATER Radioisotope
Half-Life Concentration in Reactor Water
(µCi/cc)
Soluble F-18 1.8 hr. 0.004 Mn-56 2.56 hr. 0.002 Ni-65 2.56 hr. 0.00005 Zn-69m 13.8 hr. 0.00001 Na-24 15 hr. 0.002 W-187 24 hr. 0.00001 Co-58 70 days 0.0004 Co-60 5 yr. 0.00004 Fe-59 45 days 0.0000002 P-32 14 days 0.00002 Cr-51 27 days 0.0002 Ag-110m 270 days 0.00006 Mn-54 300 days 0.000002 Zn-65 245 days 0.000001 Total Soluble 0.01 Insoluble Mn-56 2.56 hr. 0.05 Co-58 70 days 0.005 Co-60 5 yr. 0.0005 Fe-59 45 days 0.00008 Mn-54 300 days 0.00004 Cr-51 27 days 0.0003 Ag-110m 270 days 0.000003 Zn-69m 13.8 hr. 0.00002 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.1-2*
CONCENTRATIONS OF ACTIVATION PRODUCTS IN REACTOR WATER (Sheet 2 of 2)
Revision 8, October 2005
Radioisotope
Half-Life Concentration in Reactor Water
(µCi/cc)
W-187 24 hr. 0.003 Ni-65 2.56 hr. 0.0002 Zn-65 245 days 0.000001 Total Insoluble 0.06
Total Activity (Soluble and Insoluble) 0.07
- The values noted in this table represent design basis concentrations and remain valid for core uprate to 2957 MWt.
(Sheet 1 of 2)
Revision 7, January 2003 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.1-3
ORIGINAL REACTOR AND RECIRCULATION SYSTEM
Parameter Reactor Design Turbine Maximum 1. Reactor Power (MWt) 2237 2511 2. Core - active fuel length - in. 144 (145.25 new length) --- equivalent diameter - in. 182.2 --- circumscribed diameter - in. 189.7 --- 3. Number of Fuel Assemblies 724 --- 4. Overall Average Core Power Density watts/cc 36.65 (34.2 for new length) 40.48 5. Total Coolant Flow Rate through the Core - lb/hr 98 x 10 6 98 x 10 6 6. Primary Steam Flow Rate -
lb/hr 8.605 x 10 6 9.764 x 10 6 7. Core Power Peaking Factors: Max. at Core ~ At Core Boundary (Axial) Pave Pmax z 1.57 0.7 (Radial) Pave Pmax R 1.50 0.7 QUAD CITIES -UFSAR
Table 11.1-3 (Continued)
ORIGINAL REACTOR AND RECIRCULATION SYSTEM (Sheet 2 of 2)
Revision 7, January 2003 Parameter Reactor Design Turbine Maximum 8. Core Volume Fractions:
Material Density (gm/cc) Volume Fraction Volume Fraction UO{2} 10.4 0.254 .0254 Zr 6.4 0.130 0.130 H 2O 1.0 0.334 0.296 Void 0 0.282 0.320 9. Reactor Operating Pressure -
psia 1015 1015 10. Average Water Density Between Core and Vessel - gm/cc 0.73 0.73 11. Average Water Density Below Core - gm/cc 0.74 0.74 12. Average Water-Steam Density Above Core:
In the Plenum Region - gm/cc 0.27 --- Above the Plenum (homogenized) gm/cc 0.52 --- 13. Nitrogen-16 activity of steam leaving the vessel (average gamma energy of 6.2 MEV/
() 4.15 x 10 5 MEV/cc-sec 54.6 Ci/sec 4.73 x 10 5 MEV/cc-sec 70.3 Ci/sec
(Sheet 1 of 2)
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.1-4
- DRYWELL EQUIPMENT DRAIN SUMP SOURCES FOR RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL
- Leak or Drain (Rates are for one Reactor)
Gal. per day Dchrg. Vol. Gal. Activity Concentration
(µCi/cc) Daily Activity
(µCi/day) Norm. Max. Norm. Max. Recirc. Pump Seal Leakage 1400--- 1 x 10
-15 6 x 10 5 3 x 10 7 Recirc. Valve Seal Leakage 380--- 1 x 10
-15 2 x 10 5 7 x 10 6 Steam Valve Seal Leakage 190--- 1 x 10
-4 5 x 10-3 7 x 10 1 3 x 10 3 RCIC and HPCI System Valve
Leakage 190--- 1 x 10
-4 5 x 10-3 7 x 10 1 3 x 10 3 Clean Up Valve Seal Leakage 100--- 1 x 10
-15 4 x 10 4 2 x 10 6 Shut Down Valve Seal Leakage 190--- 1 x 10
-4 5 x 10-3 7 x 10 1 3 x 10 5 Control Rod Drive Valve Seal Leakage 100--- 5 x 10
-6 1 x 10-3 2 4 x 10 2 Totals of Continuous Inputs 2600--- 7 x 10
-23 7 x 10 5 3 x 10 7 Relief Valve Blowoff (Infrequent) ---<30010 -- --- --- Recirc. Drains (Infrequent) ---<80010 -- ---
Vent Reactor for HydroTest (1/yr.) ---<100<10 -- --- --- Steam Line Drains (Startup) --- --- <10 -- (Heat Exchanger)
Control Rod Drive Drains (Infrequent) ---100<10-3--- --- --- Bellows Drain (Startup) ---<1000<10
-3 --- --- ---
- See notes following this Table.
- Original estimated numbers.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.1-4
- DRYWELL EQUIPMENT DRAIN SUMP SOURCES FOR RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL
- (Sheet 2 of 2)
NOTES
THE FOLLOWING ARE APPLICABLE TO TABLES 11.1-4 THROUGH 11.1-11:
- 1. The following definitions apply to Tables 11.1-4 through 11.1-11:
Normal Volume - Expected volume du ring steady state normal operation.
Maximum Volume - Maximum expected volume during unsteady state operation such as startup, shutdown, high equipment
leakage, etc.
Normal Activity - Activity level ex pected during operation with no fuel leaks - corrosion product reactor water activity concentration of 0.1 µCi/cc.
Maximum Activity - Activity level expected during operation with fuel leak rate equivalent to reactor water activity concentration of 4.6 µCi/cc (corrosion and fission products present).
Caution: Maximum volume and maximum activity are not necessarily concurrent.
- 2. Waste system input activities are based on a reactor water-to-steam decontamination factor of 10
-3.
- 3. Activity shown as of plant origin and does not include background.
(Sheet 1of 1)
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.1-5
- REACTOR BUILDING EQUIPMENT DRAIN TANK SOURCES FOR RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL
- Leak or Drain (Rates are for one Reactor)
Gal. per day Dschrg. Vol. Gal.Activity Concentration
(µCi/cc) Daily Activity
(µCi/day) Norm. Max. Norm. Max. Clean Up Pump Seal Leakage 480--- 1 x 10
-3 5 x 10 2 2 x 10 3 8 x 10 4 Control Rod Drive Sump Seal
Leakage 240--- 5 x 10
-6 1 x 10-3 5 9 x 10 2 Scram Valve Seal Leakage 510--- 5 x 10
-6 1 x 10-3 10 2 x 10 3 Feed Valve Seal Leakage 290--- 1 x 10
-6 5 x 10-5 1 5 x 10 2 Miscellaneous Valve Seal Leakage 1400--- 1 x 10
-2 5 x 10-1 6 x 10 4 3 x 10 6 Clean Up Sample Drains 430--- 3 x 10
-2 2 6 x 10 4 3 x 10 6 Clean Up Sludge Pump Leakage ------ --- --- --- ---
Clean Up Decant Pump Leakage ------ --- --- --- --- Totals of Continuous Inputs 3400--- 9 x 10
-3 4 x 10-1 1 x 10 5 5 x 10 6 Shutdown - Tube Side ---350<10 -- --- ---
Regenerative - Shell and Tube Side ---1000<10 -- --- ---
Non-Regenerative - Tube Side ---250<10-4--- --- ---
Control Rod Hydraulic System Drains (Infrequent) ---2005 x 10 -- --- ---
Clean Up Relief Valve Drains (Infrequent) --------- --- --- ---
Clean Up Phase Separator Drains and Overflow --- ---2 x 10 -- --- ---
- See notes following Table 11.1-4.
- Original estimated numbers.
(Sheet 1of 1)
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.1-6
- RADWASTE BUILDING EQUIPMENT DRAIN SUMP SOURCES FOR RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL
Leak or Drain (Rates are for two Reactors)
Gal. per day Dschrg. Vol. Gal.Activity Concentration
(µCi/cc) Daily Activity (µCi/day) Norm. Max. Norm. Max. Condensate Sludge Pump
Leakage --- --- --- --- ---
^^--- Waste Collector Pump Leakage --- --- --- --- --- --- Waste Sample Pump Leakage --- --- --- --- --- --- Condensate Decant. Pump Leakage --- --- --- --- --- --- Waste Surge Pump Leakage --- --- --- --- --- ---
Precoat and Filter Aid Pump Leakage --- --- --- --- --- ---
Condensate Phase Separator Tanks, Drains, and Overflow --- --- --- --- --- ---
Waste Sample and Waste Sludge Tanks, Drain, and
Overflow --- --- --- --- --- --- Radwaste Filter Head Drain --- --- --- --- --- ---
Waste Demineralizer and Spent Resin Tank, Drain and
Overflow --- --- --- --- --- --- Totals of Continuous Inputs 1000 --- 1 x10
-4 5 x 10-3 4 x 10 2 2 x 10 4
- See notes following Table 11.1-4.
- Original estimated numbers.
(Sheet 1of 1)
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.1-7
- TURBINE BUILDING EQUIPMENT DRAIN SUMP SOURCES FOR RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL
Leak or Drain (Rates are for one Reactor)
Gal. per day Dschrg. Vol. Gal. Activity Concentration
(µCi/cc) Daily Activity (µCi/day) Norm. Max. Norm. Max. Condensate Pump Seal
Leakage 1900---1 x 10
-4 5 x 10-3 7 x 10 2 3 x 10 4 Feed Pump Seal Leakage 720---1 x 10
-6 5 x 10-5 3 1 x 10 2 Off Gas Drains 2100---0 8 x 10
-2 0 6 x 10 5 Condensate and Feed System Sample Drain 960---1 x 10
-5 5 x 10-4 4 x 10 1 2 x 10 3 Totals of Continuous Inputs 5700---4 x 10
-5 3 x 10-2 8 x 10 2 7 x 10 5 Condensate Backwash Receiving Tank Drain and
Overflow ------5 x 10 -- --- ---
Heater Vents and Drains (6/yr.) ---500<10-4--- --- ---
Heater Maintenance Drains (Infrequent) ---1500<10 -- --- ---
Condensate Maintenance Drains ---100<10-4--- --- ---
Feed Heater Relief Valves (Infrequent) --- ---5 x 10 -- --- ---
- See notes following Table 11.1-4.
- Original estimated numbers.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR (Sheet 1 of 1)
Table 11.1-8
- DRYWELL FLOOR DRAIN SUMPS SOURCES FOR RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL
- Leak or Drain (Rates are for one Reactor)
Gal. per day Dschrg. Vol. Gal.Activity Concentration
(µCi/cc) Daily Activity (µCi/day) Norm. Max. Norm. Max. Control Rod Drive Flange
Leakage 2500---5 x 10
-6 1 x 10-3 5 x 10 1 1 x 10 4 Floor Drains 500---5 x 10
-6 1 x 10-3 10 2 x 10 3 Totals of Continous Inputs 3000---5 x 10
-6 1 x 10-3 6 x 10 1 1 x 10 4 Control Blade Backseat Leakage (Infrequent) ------<10-3--- --- ---
Closed Cooling Water System Drains (Infrequent) ---100<10-3--- --- ---
Vent Cooler Drains (Infrequent) ------10-4--- --- ---
- See notes following Table 11.1-4.
- Original estimated numbers.
(Sheet 1of 1)
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.1-9
- REACTOR BUILDING FLOOR DRAIN SUMPS SOURCES FOR RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL
Leak or Drain (Rates are for one Reactor)
Gal. per day Dschrg. Vol. Gal.Activity Concentration
(µCi/cc) Daily Activity (µCi/day) Norm. Max. Norm. Max. Floor Drains 2000--- 1 x 10
-4 2 x 10-2 8 x 10 2 1 x 10 5 Total of Continuous Inputs 2000--- 1 x 10
-4 2 x 10-2 8 x 10 2 1 x 10 5 Non-regenerative Shell Side --- 350<10 -- --- --- Shutdown ~ Shell Side --- 650<10 -- --- ---
- See notes following Table 11.1-4.
- Original estimated numbers.
(Sheet 1of 1)
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.1-10
- RADWASTE BUILDING FLOOR DRAN SUMPS SOURCES FOR RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL
Leak or Drain (Rate is for two Reactors)
Gal. per day Dschrg. Vol. Gal.Activity Concentration
(µCi/cc) Daily Activity (µCi/day) Norm. Max. Norm. Max. Floor Drain Collector Tank
Pump Leakage --- --- --- --- --- ---
Waste Collector Tank Drain and Overflow --- --- --- --- --- ---
Floor Drain Collector Tank Drain and Overflow --- --- --- --- --- ---
Chemical Waste Pump Leakage --- --- --- --- --- --- Chemical Waste Tank Drain and Overflow --- --- --- --- --- --- Floor Drain Filter Head Drain --- --- --- --- --- ---
Floor Drain Sample Pump Leakage --- --- --- --- --- ---
Floor Drain Sample Tank Drain and Overflow --- --- --- --- --- --- Totals of Continuous Inputs 1000 --- 2 x 10
-5 9 x 10-4 8 x 10 1 3 x 10 3
- See notes following Table 11.1-4.
- Original estimated numbers.
(Sheet 1of 1)
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.1-11
- TURBINE BUILDING FLOOR DRAIN SUMPS SOURCES FOR RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL
Leak or Drain (Rates are for one Reactor)
Gal. per day Dschrg. Vol. Gal.Activity Concentration
(µCi/cc) Daily Activity (µCi/day) Norm. Max. Norm. Max. Floor Drains 2000--- 1 x 10
-6 5 x 10-5 8 4 x 10 2 Total of Continuous Inputs 2000--- 1 x 10
-6 5 x 10-5 8 4 x 10 2
- See notes following Table 11.1-4.
- Original estimated numbers.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 13, October 2015 11.2-1 11.2 LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS The various liquid radwaste treatment meth ods utilized to reduce the discharge of radioactivity to the lowest practicable limit are discussed in detail in this section.
P&IDs M-51, M-52 and M-57 show the major flow paths of the liquid radwaste systems.
P&IDs M-53, M-54, M-57 and M-59 show the interf aces with the solid radwaste systems.
P&IDs M-51 and M-543, show the liquid radioacti ve waste discharge pathway. Radioactive Effluent Release Reports are submitted to the NRC in accordance with Technical Specifications requirements and specifies the quant ities of each radionuclide released to the unrestricted areas in both the liquid and gaseous (see Section 11.3) effluents during the
period. These reports shall be in accordanc e with the format and content required by Regulatory Guide 1.21, Revision 1, dated June 1974.
[11.2-1]
11.2.1 Design Bases
The liquid radioactive waste system collects, tre ats, stores, and disposes as necessary all radioactive liquid wastes. Liquid wastes ar e collected in sumps and drain tanks in the various buildings, then transferred to the appr opriate tanks in the radwaste building for further treatment or temporary storage, and discharge. If the waste meets the requirements for re-use, it is recycled back into the contaminated condensate storage tanks.
If it does not meet recycling requirement s, the contents are either returned for reprocessing or discharged from the plant.
[11.2-2]
The Quad Cities radwaste system was designed to achieve a radionuclide concentration, for discharge of any batch, when diluted with th e circulating water flow, of less than 1 x 10
-7 µCi/cc on an unidentified basis. The radionuclide concentration on an annual average basis
are expected to be even lower than five mrem which meets "low as practicable" criterion.
[11.2-3]
Batches with radioactivity concentrations low enough to allow discharge to the river are released to the discharge flume weir. Wast es to be discharged from the system are handled on a batch basis with each one being analyzed and handled appropriately. These batches are diluted with condenser circulati ng water effluent in order to achieve a discharge concentration, at the point of entry into the river, below the limits set by 10 CFR 20, and Illinois and Iowa state regulations.
[11.2-4]
The design provides for dewatering and solidif ication of sludges and ion exchange resins to facilitate their storage and disposal offsit e as solid wastes. The dewatering and solidification of radioactive sludges and ion ex change resins is covered in Section 11.4.
[11.2-5]
A waste demineralizer decontamination fa ctor of 100 was used for designing the demineralizer resin bed depth and volume. Th is decontamination factor was also used in the original determination of the individual nuclide concentrations in the effluent based on
the original estimated influent nuclide concentrations.
[11.2-6]
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 13, October 2015 11.2-2 11.2.2 System Description
The process and instrumentation diagrams P&
IDs M-51, M-52 and M-57 show the collection and processing flow paths of the liquid radi oactive waste system. The liquid radioactive waste system interfaces with the solid radioa ctive waste system are shown in P&IDs M-57, M-53 and M-59. The liquid radioactive waste discharge pathway is shown in P&IDs M-51 and M-543. The radwaste tank capacities are given in Table 11.2-1.
[11.2-7] Table 11.2-1 shows the approximate inventory by isotope for each of the radwaste tanks shown in P&IDs M-51, M-52, M-57, M-53 and M-54.
This table assumes that all tanks are filled to the maximum listed tank volume, whic h is not the case under normal operating conditions. These values are based on operatin g data gathered at Quad-Cities. Table 11.2-2 shows the estimated inventory by isotope for so lid radioactive material collected in radwaste tankage. Because tanks may have freshly collected batches, the waste and floor drain sample tanks' isotopic inventor y had a 12-hour decay time applie d to more realistically show what will be present after process ti me through the respective systems.
[11.2-8]
The liquid radioactive waste disposal system , a batch-type system, collects and processes waste in an efficient manner. Processed liquid wastes are returned to the plant for re-use, discharged from the plant with dilution from th e discharge flume weir flow or returned to the station's radwaste systems for additional treatment. Processed liquid wastes can be discharged in batches that are verified as m eeting the necessary standards of radioactivity concentration and chemical purity. Additi onally, the required composite samples are accumulated from samples taken from the disc harge sample tanks prior to liquid discharge to the river. Furthermore, liquid waste di scharge records are maintained onsite.
[11.2-9]
In an effort to realize the most effective treat ment methods the various wastes are collected separately by type. This segregates lower acti vity wastes from higher activity wastes and limits the volume and activity of radioactive waste discharged to the environment. The Quad Cities liquid radwaste system is designed to treat all liquid wastes prior to discharge.
Four subsystems are involved and include:
[11.2-10]
- 1. Floor drain,
- 2. Waste collector,
- 3. Chemical waste, and
- 4. Laundry drain.
The sources of liquid radioactive waste at Quad Cities are from the equipment drains, the floor drains, the laboratory drains, chemical decontamination solutions, and laundry drains.
[11.2-11]
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 13, October 2015 11.2-3 Radioactive liquid wastes are received and processed in the four subsystems listed previously and shown in P&IDs M-51, M-52, M-57, M-53 and M-543. To ensure that wastes are processed through the equipment provided in each of these systems, the following system features are incorporated:
[11.2-12]
A. Processing equipment is designed and selected so maintenance requirements are minimized, i.e., minimal rotating parts and shielding for access while other equipment is operational.
B. The floor drain filter, the waste f ilter, and the spare fl oor drain filter are crossconnected so one may be used in place of the other if a unit requires
maintenance.
C. Pumps are crossconnected with other pumps so a malfunctioning pump does not adversely affect process flow capability or hinder repair/replacement time.
D. Since the subsystems are batch operat ions, rather than continuous operations, they are preceded by collection tanks that can accumulate wastes. A floor drain surge tank is also provided to accumula te system surges. Normally, the floor drain surge tank, is less than 20% full exce pt during outages. After collection, the tank's contents can be further processe d in the radwaste system by filtration and ion-exchange processes.
E. Certain operations are also subject to scheduling and can be delayed in the event of mechanical problems. Examples are:
- 1. Transfer to and from the cleanup and condensate phase separators,
- 2. Transfer to and from the waste sludge tank and spent resin tanks,
F. Steam cleaning connections are provid ed for the waste, floor drain, and spare filters so that in-place cleaning can be performed in about three hours.
G. Cycle times allowed for in the design permit filter backwashing and precoating as a part of normal procedure.
Waste and floor drain demineralizer resins can be replaced in less than a shift, the major task being handling of the resins from containe r to demineralizer. Resin replacement is an infrequent operation. An essential factor is to maintain an appropriate resin inventory at the station for replacement.
[11.2-13]
Wastes that accumulate in the floor drain colle ctor tank are considered low purity waste.
These wastes, which are moderately condu ctive and generally have low radioactive concentrations, are processed through a filter (to remove insoluble material) and one or more demineralizers (to remove soluble materi al) and routed to the floor drain sample tanks. Following batch sampling, the wastes are normally outside the station criteria for re-use in the plant and are returned to the ra dwaste system for reprocessing or to river discharge. If wastes are within the station cri teria for re-use in the plant, then wastes can be returned to the condensate storage system for re-use.
[11.2-14]
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 13, October 2015 11.2-4 Wastes accumulated in the waste collector tank are considered high purity waste. These low conductivity wastes have variable radioacti ve concentrations dependent upon their area of collection. Normally, these wastes are proc essed through a filter, (to remove insoluble material) and one or more demineralizers (to remove soluble material) and routed to the waste sample tanks. Following batch sampling, the wastes are normally returned to the condensate storage system for reuse. Water outside the station criteria for re-use in the plant is returned to the radwaste system for reprocessing or to river discharge.
The waste collected in the chemical waste tank may be transferred to the floor or equipment drain system or the chemical waste sample tank. From the chemical waste sample tank, the waste may be transferred to the new spent resin tank for further processing or to the floor or equipment drain sy stems. Inputs to the chemical waste system include laboratory drains, leakage from Re actor Water Cleanup and Fuel Pool Demin manual drain valves and decon operations.
[11.2-15]
Detergent wastes collected in the laundry drai n tanks are generally low in activity and produced in small volumes. These factors resu lt in a low total activity discharge to the environment. Laundry wastes do not require treatment other than filtration. Laundry wastes are filtered and sent to the laundry sa mple tank for sampling and further filtering, if required, prior to transfer to the floor drain collector tank or river discharge tank.
[11.2-16]
Resins which are basically "spent" from proce ssing waste or floor drain collector waste can be further used for initial processing of chem ical wastes. Batch discharges from the river discharge tank consist mainly of laundry water filtered prior to discharge, or floor drain, collector, waste collector water which has been processed, but does not meet the criteria (such as high organic content) for re-use.
Predicted daily average radioactivity quantities anticipated concurrent with design basis fuel leaks are given in Table 11.2-3.
[11.2-17]
Liquid effluents are released from the river di scharge tank in batches, which is the only liquid release path from Radwaste utilized after sampling and analysis, through a
monitored radioactive liquid waste line. The monitor station has an alarm. The discharge line directs the effluent to the discharge flum e weir and provides adequate dilution with station condenser circulating water to assure t hat the effluent reaching the river is below the regulatory requirements for the mixture of all the nuclides released. This line and the now abandoned discharge line directing effluent to the south diffuser line are the only release paths used since May 1984, when the Quad Cities station condenser circulating
water system was changed to discharge directl y into the river rather than to the spray canal. This change increases the dilution flow when radioactive liquids are batch released
from the river discharge tank to the circula ting water system. Table 11.2-4 shows the expected activity in the discharge bay and th e Mississippi River based on historical data and pre-uprate conditions. Core uprate to 2957 MWt is expected to increase the activity in the liquid waste discharged by the percentage of the uprate, i.e., 18%. The river discharge tank and either the river discharge pump or the waste surge pump provide a single discharge point from the station. The dischar ge is monitored by a radiation monitor which has no automatic functions and is provided for record and alarm only. The radiation monitor is described in Section 11.5.2.7. Sinc e the river discharge tank is the only tank used for discharge, the chances for inadvertent discharges are minimized. Spool pieces are provided to allow water in the river dischar ge tank to be returned to radwaste for additional treatment. Under discharge conditio ns, the discharge line is isolated from the radwaste process line.
[11.2-18]
The expected concentration of each principal radionuclide (half-life greater than 30
minutes) which are contained in the various co mponents of the liquid radwaste treatment system and the associated piping and valves fo r each of the above components, are shown in Tables 11.2-1 and 11.2-2.
[11.2-19]
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 11, October 2011 11.2-5 Four deep-bed demineralizers can be used in the radwaste system. Pressure precoat-type filter/demineralizers, using powd ered ion exchange resins and f ilter media, are used in the fuel pool cleanup system, reactor water cl eanup (RWCU) system condensate feedwater system, and radwaste system filters. The d eep-bed ion exchange resins and the powdered ion exchange resins are not regenerated.
[11.2-20]
All radwaste filter sludges are either collected in the waste sludge tank or the condensate phase-separators. Spent resins from the wa ste demineralizer are collected in the waste spent resin tank. Spent resins from the A, B, and C demineralizers are collected in the max-recycle spent resin tank.
[11.2-21]
The waste sludge tank solids isotopic invent ory is an approximation dependant upon which streams have contributed to the total batch acti vity mixture. Normal input to the waste sludge tank is from the floor drain, spare floor drain, and waste filter backwashes, and floor drain collector tank blowdowns.
[11.2-22]
Cleanup system filter/demineralizer sludge is collected in the cleanup phase-separators.
Condensate filter/demineralizer sludge and fuel pool system filter demineralizer sludge are generally collected in the condensate phase-se parators. Excess backwash water is removed by decantation and the sludge is accumulated for radioactive decay and further processing.
The sludge consists of filter precoat material (powered resins and filter media), activated corrosion products, fission products, and other insoluble materials. Decant water from the phase separators is transferred to the wast e collector tank. Decant water from the condensate phase separators may be transferre d to the floor drain collector tank or waste collector tank.
[11.2-23] Overall control of the radwaste processing sy stem is exercised from the radwaste building control room. A main panel in this room contains the instrumentation and control
components for system operation. In addition , local control stations are provided for the filter backwash and precoating operations, and waste processi ng. Alarm annunciation is in the radwaste control room or at local panels.
[11.2-24]
11.2.2.1 Protection Against Accidental Discharge
Design redundancy, instrumentation for dete ction and alarm of abnormal conditions, and procedural controls provide protection agains t accidental discharge. The arrangement of the radwaste building and waste processing methods substantially immobilize the wastes within the station. This is to assure that in the event of a failure of any of the liquid waste
equipment or errors in operation of the syst em, the potential for inadvertent release of liquids is extremely small. For example, the system's tanks, which may contain high-level activity inventories, are located in the radw aste building basement at a floor elevation 21 feet 7 inches below grade level. The tanks include:
[11.2-25]
A. Four condensate phase separator tanks,
B. Chemical waste tank,
C. Floor drain collector tank,
D. Waste collector tank,
E. Waste spent resin tank, and
F. Waste sludge tank.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 4, April 1997 11.2-6 If the largest tank in the radwaste basement (collector tank) failed, 22,000 gallons of water would be released and would result in a basement liquid waste level of less than 4 feet.
This level of water would not be capable of raising any other basement tank since all tanks are supported by legs about 3 feet above floor level.
[11.2-26]
Other equipment such as filters, demineraliz ers, centrifuges, pumps, max-recycle spent resin tank, etc., are contained within cells or rooms so that leakage is contained within the building.
[11.2-27]
The following tanks are located in the radwaste tank farm:
[11.2-28]
A. River discharge tank,
B. Two floor drain sample tanks,
C. Two waste sample tanks,
D. Laundry sample tank, and
E. Chemical waste sample tank.
These tanks contain filtered or otherwise treat ed water with the exception of the chemical waste sample tank.
The tank farm is contained in a concrete basin.
This basin is sized to retain all of the water contained in the above tanks should any or all of the tanks leak or fail. There is a drain line which leads from the bottom of the basin and drains into the radwaste building floor
drain sump, located in the radwaste basement. A second drain line from the bottom of the
basin that leads to the storm sewer has been capped downstream of valve 1/2-2001-804.
The estimated radioactivity content in these tanks is given in Table 11.2-5.
[11.2-29]
Consequently, in the event of leaks or spills fr om radwaste tank farm tanks or equipment, control of the liquid radioactive waste is assure d to the extent that there will be no spread of radioactivity to the grounds or other areas outside the confines of the station. Sumps and pumps collect any such waste and return them to the appropriate system for processing. The waste surge tank was renamed the river discharge tank and the piping was modified such that it is the single disc harge tank for radioactive liquid waste from the station to the river.
[11.2-30]
11.2.2.2 Administration
The principal administrative areas involved in maintaining an operational system are daily planning of radwaste processing, control of the station water inventory and conducting a preventive maintenance program.
[11.2-31]
Radwaste system planning assures that wastes are processed in a timely manner and that station operations, such as refueling, and maintenance activities (draining, flushing, decontamination, etc.,) are coordinated to prev ent the flooding of the radwaste system with unexpected quantities of water.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 6, October 2001 11.2-7 A daily planning of radwaste operations is co nducted, to instruct operators on the various waste water movements to be made. This planning can anticipate inputs such as from
cleanup and condensate filter/demineralizer backwashing, and draining and flushing of equipment for maintenance. The net result of such planning is to keep the wastes moving through the system, recognize and correct difficu lties as they may occur, and keep tank inventories low. Proper planning and its subsequent execution leaves capability and capacity available for unusual conditions (e.g
., equipment malfunctions, and condenser tube leaks.) [11.2-32]
In addition to operations planning, daily log sheets provide data on waste volumes processed through the various subsystems. Cha rting of such data shows trends in station performance. Thus, a systematic increase in fl oor drain volume would lead to a search for its cause and a plan for corrective maintenance. Waste volumes are thus kept in the "normal" design range so system capacity is not impaired by continued abnormal inputs.
Station inventory control is done to minimi ze the necessity for discharging waste water because of excessive inputs via the makeup sy stem. Both the planning and water inventory control activities are also useful in detecting abnormal inputs to radwaste (thus revealing the causes of such inputs and the need for correction).
[11.2-33]
Provisions are made in the design of the stat ion to detect leakage from vital fluid carrying systems at and beyond the reactor coolant pr essure boundary. These leakage detection methods are discussed in detail in Sections 5.2.5 and 5.2.6.
[11.2-34]
The preventive maintenance program has the obvious objective of minimizing unplanned
equipment conditions which would affect ra dwaste performance. The crossties and equipment spares noted previously accommodate such conditions in critical flow paths.
[11.2-35]
11.2.2.3 Inspection and Testing
Testing of this system is precluded by its no rmal day-to-day operation. Inspection is performed per equipment requirements and normal maintenance procedures.
[11.2-36]
11.2.3 Radioactive Releases
In passing through the various tanks of the ra dwaste system, the wastes are subjected to a holdup time which varies from approximately 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> to 1 week, and permits decay of the numerous short half-life constituents.
[11.2-37]
The procedure for computing the discharge rate involves independent calculation by the Chemistry Technician and Field Supervisor.
The results are compared by the Shift Engineer who also determines the discharge ra te. This provides additional protection against improper discharge to the river.
[11.2-38]
A comparison of liquid radioactive waste di scharges and their potential effects on the environment is shown in Table 11.2-6. Table 11.2-6, Line IIB, shows the environs dose rate
which would occur for the conditions shown in Table 11.2-3. The dose rate in the discharge flume assumes this to be a person's sole source of drinking water. The dose rates in the river are given assuming each of the two river flows were to occur all year. The two flow cases are obviously conservative, using minimum and average flows for QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 6, October 2001 11.2-8 dilution in the river. The last columns show station contributed dose as a fraction of natural background.
[11.2-39]
The station liquid radwaste discharge contributio n to population radiation dose is a small fraction of natural background and the natural variations therein (~5 mrem/yr). Thus, the criteria for "as low as reasonably achievable" (A LARA) is satisfied. For conditions where fuel leakage is less than the design basis am ount, smaller activity discharges and resultant potential dose rates will occur.
Lines I and IIa of Table 11.2-6 show, respecti vely, the Curies per year which could be discharged within the legal maximum permitted under 10 CFR 20 and under the ODCM
limit of a discharge flume concentration of 10
-7 µCi/cc.
Based upon operating experience in other BWRs, the maximum permissible concentration (MPC) of the isotopes present is approximately 1.6 x 10
-6 µCi/cc; thus, discharge flume concentrations of 10
-7 µCi/cc or less, represent a safety factor of approximately 20 compared to the identified mixture concentration of 1.6 x 10
-6 µCi/cc.
To show that the liquid wastes discharged conti nue to be representative of an MPC of about 1.6 x 10-6 µCi/cc, quarterly analyses of representative wastes are made. Since station operation is characterized by periodic gross a ctivity, gross iodine analys es of reactor water, and by continuous monitoring of off-gas fission gases, the activity in the station is known.
Liquid radwaste activities are characterized by this information and the quarterly liquid waste analyses. Such information and analysis is in keeping with recent revisions to 10 CFR 20 and 10 CFR 50, which require that wast e discharge information be known so that estimates of radiation dose exposure of offs ite persons can be made. Records of station operation will thus be able also to show th e insignificance of liquid waste discharges and that they are ALARA."
The radioactivity released with the liquid wast es is difficult to define since the liquid wastes come from a number of sources and the quantity of activity is a major function of plant operation, including holdup time. The total amount of activity and the relative quantities of each isotope will vary significantly from day to day with varying power levels and leakage from fuel elements.
[11.2-40]
The expected average annual activity discharged should be less than one-fourth of that permissible under 10 CFR 20. This estimati on assumes that the activity discharged consists only of radioisotopes Sr-90 and Pb-210 which overstates the actual radioactivity contribution to the environs.
[11.2-41]
The river discharge tank entry in Table 11.2-1 shows the most significant isotopes which may be present in the combined liquid waste discharged offsite.
Because neither Ra-226 nor Ra-228 of statio n origin will be present, the discharge concentration for an otherwise unidentified mixtur e is set at a fixed maximum. However, if certain other radioisotopes which, when determ ined by the methods set forth in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, are considered absent, then high er permissible concentrations may be used for discharge. Waste discharges are averaged for th e calendar year. Normal river flow further dilutes the specific radioactivity concentrations present. The waste activity actually in the river is of the order of one-thousandth of the maximum permissible concentration per 10
CFR 20 for the mixtures generally discharged.
[11.2-42]
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR (Sheet 1 of 8)
Revision 6, October 2001 Table 11.2-1 EXPECTED INDIVIDUAL NUCLIDE CONCENTRATION µCi/cc OF LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE IN RADWASTE TANKAGE BASED ON OPERATIONAL DATA Waste Collector Tank Floor Drain Collector Tank Waste Sample Tank Floor Drain Sample Tank Cleanup Phase Separators Condensate Phase Separators Chemical Waste Tank River Discharge Tank Laundry Drain Sample Tank Number of tanks 1 1 2 2 4 4 1 1 2
Expected µCi contained in all full
tanks* 7 x 10 3 7 x 10 3 1 x 10 4 1 x 10 4 5 x 10 7 2 x 10 8 1 x 10 3 2 x 10 4 6 x 10 2 Expected average
µCi contained in all full tanks
- 1 x 10 3 1 x 10 3 2 x 10 3 2 x 10 3 8 x 10 6 2 x 10 7 2 x 10 2 3 x 10 3 9 x 10 1 Maximum tank volume per tank (gallon) 22,000 21,000 22,000 21,000 4,500 12,500 5,000 65,000 1,000
- The table assumes that all tanks are filled to the maximum listed tank volume, which is not the case under normal operating conditions.
Table 11.2-1 (Continued)
EXPECTED INDIVIDUAL NUCLIDE CONCENTRATION µCi/cc OF LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE IN RADWASTE TANKAGE BASED ON OPERATIONAL DATA (Sheet 2 of 8)
Revision 5, June 1999 QUAD CITIES
-UFSAR Half Life (Days)
Nuclide Waste Collector Tank Floor Drain Collector Tank Waste Sample Tank Floor Drain Sample Tank Cleanup Phase Separators Condensate Phase Separators Chemical Waste Tank River Discharge Tank Laundry Drain Sample Tank 27.7 Cr-51 5 x 10
-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-3 5 x 10-3 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 2.75 Tc-99m 2 x 10
-6 2 x 10-6 2 x 10-6 2 x 10-6 2 x 10-2 2 x 10-2 2 x 10-6 2 x 10-6 2 x 10-6 2.36 Np-239 9 x 10
-7 9 x 10-7 9 x 10-7 9 x 10-7 9 x 10-3 9 x 10-3 9 x 10-7 9 x 10-7 9 x 10-7 1.38 Ce-143 1 x 10
-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-4 1 x 10-4 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 8.04 I-131 4 x 10
-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-3 4 x 10-3 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 0.185 Ru-105 3 x 10
-7 3 x 10-7 3 x 10-7 3 x 10-7 3 x 10-3 3 x 10-3 3 x 10-7 3 x 10-7 3 x 10-7 39.4 Ru-103 1 x 10
-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-4 1 x 10-4 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 0.867 I-133 6 x 10
-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-2 6 x 10-2 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 12.8 Ba-140 5 x 10
-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-3 5 x 10-3 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 0.0954 I-132 3 x 10
-9 3 x 10-9 3 x 10-9 3 x 10-9 3 x 10-5 3 x 10-5 3 x 10-9 3 x 10-9 3 x 10-9 0.996 W-187 7 x 10
-9 7 x 10-9 7 x 10-9 7 x 10-9 7 x 10-5 7 x 10-5 7 x 10-9 7 x 10-9 7 x 10-9 64 Zr-95 2 x 10
-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-4 2 x 10-4 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2.75 Mo-99 1 x 10
-6 1 x 10-6 1 x 10-6 1 x 10-6 1 x 10-2 1 x 10-2 1 x 10-6 1 x 10-6 1 x 10-6 0.704 Zr-97 2 x 10
-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-3 2 x 10-3 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 Table 11.2-1 (Continued)
EXPECTED INDIVIDUAL NUCLIDE CONCENTRATION µCi/cc OF LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE IN RADWASTE TANKAGE BASED ON OPERATIONAL DATA (Sheet 3 of 8)
Revision 5, June 1999 QUAD CITIES
-UFSAR Half Life (Days)
Nuclide Waste Collector Tank Floor Drain Collector Tank Waste Sample Tank Floor Drain Sample Tank Cleanup Phase Separators Condensate Phase Separators Chemical Waste Tank River Discharge Tank Laundry Drain Sample Tank 0.396 Sr-91 6 x 10
-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-2 6 x 10-2 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 3.50 Nb-95 1 x 10
-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-4 1 x 10-4 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 70.8 Co-58 2 x 10
-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-4 2 x 10-4 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 312 Mn-54 3 x 10
- 3 x 10-8 3 x 10-8 3 x 10-8 3 x 10-4 3 x 10-4 3 x 10-8 3 x 10-8 3 x 10-8 0.148 Y-92 2 x 10
-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-1 2 x 10-1 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 44.6 Fe-59 2 x 10
-9 2 x 10-9 2 x 10-9 2 x 10-9 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-9 2 x 10-9 2 x 10-9 0.275 I-135 1 x 10
-5 1 x 10-5 1 x 10-5 1 x 10-5 1 x 10-1 1 x 10-1 1 x 10-5 1 x 10-5 1 x 10-5 1930 Co-60 2 x 10
-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-3 2 x 10-3 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 0.113 Sr-92 7 x 10
-6 7 x 10-6 7 x 10-6 7 x 10-6 7 x 10-2 7 x 10-2 7 x 10-6 7 x 10-6 7 x 10-6 1.68 La-140 2 x 10
-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-3 2 x 10-3 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 244 Zn-65 1 x 10
-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-4 1 x 10-4 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 0.0511 Nb-97 1 x 10
-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-4 1 x 10-4 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 0.379 Xe-135 2 x 10
-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-1 2 x 10-1 2 x 10-15 2 x 10-15 2 x 10-15 13.1 Cs-136 1 x 10
-7 1 x 10-7 1 x 10-7 1 x 10-7 1 x 10-3 1 x 10-3 1 x 10-7 1 x 10-7 1 x 10-7 0.625 Na-24 4 x 10
-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-3 4 x 10-3 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 Table 11.2-1 (Continued)
EXPECTED INDIVIDUAL NUCLIDE CONCENTRATION µCi/cc OF LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE IN RADWASTE TANKAGE BASED ON OPERATIONAL DATA (Sheet 4 of 8)
Revision 5, June 1999 QUAD CITIES
-UFSAR Half Life (Days)
Nuclide Waste Collector Tank Floor Drain Collector Tank Waste Sample Tank Floor Drain Sample Tank Cleanup Phase Separators Condensate Phase Separators Chemical Waste Tank River Discharge Tank Laundry Drain Sample Tank 32.5 Ce-141 8 x 10
-9 8 x 10-9 8 x 10-9 8 x 10-9 8 x 10-5 8 x 10-5 8 x 10-9 8 x 10-9 8 x 10-9 251 Ag-110m 8 x 10
-8 8 x 10-8 8 x 10-8 8 x 10-8 8 x 10-4 8 x 10-4 8 x 10-8 8 x 10-8 8 x 10-8 11,000 Cs-137 4 x 10
-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-4 4 x 10-4 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 367 Ru-106 2 x 10
-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-4 2 x 10-4 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 753 Cs-134 2 x 10
-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8^ 2 x 10-4 2 x 10-4 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 5.24 Xe-133 2 x 10
-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-3 2 x 10-3 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 284 Ce-144 1 x 10
-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-4 1 x 10-4 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 60.2 Sb-124 4 x 10
-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-4 4 x 10-4 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 0.224 Cs-138 4 x 10
-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-3 4 x 10-3 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 TOTAL 8 x 10
-5 8 x 10-5 8 x 10-5 8 x 10-5 8 x 10-1 8 x 10-1 8 x 10-5 8 x 10-5 8 x 10-5 (Sheet 5 of 8)
Revision 5, June 1999 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Table 11.2-1 (Continued)
EXPECTED INDIVIDUAL NUCLIDE CONCENTRATION µCi/cc OF LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE IN RADWASTE TANKAGE BASED ON OPERATIONAL DATA Condensate Backwash Receiving Tank Floor Drain Surge Tank Laundry Drain Sample Tank Max Recycle Spent Resin Tank
Radwaste Mixing Tank Chemical Waste Sample Tank Waste Sludge Tank Waste Demin Spent Resin Tank Total of All Tanks Number of tanks 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ---
Expected µCi contained in all full
tanks* 7 x 10 7 6 x 10 4 3 x 10 2 3 x 10 3 8 x 10 2 2 x 10 4 5 x 10 3 4 x 10 2 3 x 10 8 Expected average
µCi contained in all full tanks*
1 x 10 7 9 x 10 3 5 x 10 1 5 x 10 2 1 x 10 2 2 x 10 3 7 x 10 2 6 x 10 1 4 x 10 7 Maximum tank volume per tank (gallon) 12, 000 200,0001,000 10,000 2,500 5,000 15,000 1,200 528,700 QUAD CITIES -UFSAR Table 11.2-1 (Continued)
EXPECTED INDIVIDUAL NUCLIDE CONCENTRATION µCi/cc OF LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE IN RADWASTE TANKAGE BASED ON OPERATIONAL DATA (Sheet 6 of 8)
Revision 5, June 1999
Half Life (Days)
Nuclide Condensate Backwash Receiving Tank Floor Drain Surge Tank Laundry Drain Sample Tank Max Recycle Spent Resin Tank
Radwaste Mixing Tank Chemical Waste Sample Tank Waste Sludge Tank Waste Demin Spent Resin Tank Total of All Tanks 27.7 Cr-51 5 x 10
-3 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10^-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-72.75 Tc-99m 2 x 10
-2 2 x 10-6 2 x 10-6 2 x 10-6 2 x 10-6 2 x 10^-6 2 x 10-6 2 x 10-6 2 x 10-62.36 Np-239 9 x 10
-3 9 x 10-7 9 x 10-7 9 x 10-7 9 x 10-7 9 x 10^-7 9 x 10-7 9 x 10-7 9 x 10-71.38 Ce-143 1 x 10
-4 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10^-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-88.04 I-131 4 x 10
-3 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-70.185 Ru-105 3 x 10
-3 3 x 10-7 3 x 10-7 3 x 10-7 3 x 10-7 3 x 10-7 3 x 10-7 3 x 10-7 3 x 10-739.4 Ru-103 1 x 10
-4 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-80.867 I-133 6 x 10
-2 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-612.8 Ba-140 5 x 10
-3 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-70.0954 I-132 3 x 10
-5 3 x 10-9 3 x 10-9 3 x 10-9 3 x 10-9 3 x 10-9 3 x 10-9 3 x 10-9 3 x 10-90.996 W-187 7 x 10
-5 7 x 10-9 7 x 10-9 7 x 10-9 7 x 10-9 7 x 10-9 7 x 10-9 7 x 10-9 7 x 10-964 Zr-95 2 x 10
-4 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-82.75 Mo-99 1 x 10
-2 1 x 10-6 1 x 10-6 1 x 10-6 1 x 10-6 1 x 10-6 1 x 10-6 1 x 10-6 1 x 10-6 QUAD CITIES -UFSAR Table 11.2-1 (Continued)
EXPECTED INDIVIDUAL NUCLIDE CONCENTRATION µCi/cc OF LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE IN RADWASTE TANKAGE BASED ON OPERATIONAL DATA (Sheet 7 of 8)
Revision 5, June 1999
Half Life (Days)
Nuclide Condensate Backwash Receiving Tank Floor Drain Surge Tank Laundry Drain Sample Tank Max Recycle Spent Resin Tank Radwaste Mixing Tank Chemical Waste Sample Tank Waste Sludge Tank Waste Demin Spent Resin Tank Total of All Tanks 0.704 Zr-97 2 x 10
-3 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 0.396 Sr-91 6 x 10
-2 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 3.50 Nb-95 1 x 10
-4 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 70.8 Co-58 2 x 10
-4 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 312 Mn-54 3 x 10
-4 3 x 10-8 3 x 10-8 3 x 10-8 3 x 10-8 3 x 10-8 3 x 10-8 3 x 10-8 3 x 10-8 0.148 Y-92 2 x 10
-1 2 x 10^-5^ 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 44.6 Fe-59 2 x 10
-5 2 x 10^-9^ 2 x 10-9 2 x 10-9 2 x 10-9 2 x 10-9 2 x 10-9 2 x 10-9 2 x 10-9 0.275 I-135 1 x 10
-1 1 x 10^-5^ 1 x 10-5 1 x 10-5 1 x 10-5 1 x 10-5 1 x 10-5 1 x 10-5 1 x 10-5 1930 Co-60 2 x 10
-3 2 x 10^-7^ 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 0.113 Sr-92 7 x 10
-2 7 x 10^-6^ 7 x 10-6 7 x 10-6 7 x 10-6 7 x 10-6 7 x 10-6 7 x 10-6 7 x 10-6 1.68 La-140 2 x 10
-3 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 244 Zn-65 1 x 10
-4 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 .0511 Nb-97 1 x 10
-4 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 QUAD CITIES -UFSAR Table 11.2-1 (Continued)
EXPECTED INDIVIDUAL NUCLIDE CONCENTRATION µCi/cc OF LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE IN RADWASTE TANKAGE BASED ON OPERATIONAL DATA (Sheet 8 of 8)
Revision 5, June 1999
Half Life (Days)
Nuclide Condensate Backwash Receiving Tank Floor Drain Surge Tank Laundry Drain Sample Tank Max Recycle Spent Resin Tank
Radwaste Mixing Tank Chemical Waste Sample Tank Waste Sludge Tank Waste Demin Spent Resin Tank Total of All Tanks 0.379 Xe-135 2 x 10
-1 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-513.1 Cs-136 1 x 10
-3 1 x 10-7 1 x 10-7 1 x 10-7 1 x 10-7 1 x 10-7 1 x 10-7 1 x 10-7 1 x 10-70.625 Na-24 4 x 10
-3 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-732.5 Ce-141 8 x 10
-5 8 x 10-9 8 x 10-9 8 x 10-9 8 x 10-9 8 x 10-9 8 x 10-9 8 x 10-9 8 x 10-9251 Ag-110m 8 x 10
-4 8 x 10-8 8 x 10-8 8 x 10-8 8 x 10-8 8 x 10-8 8 x 10-8 8 x 10-8 8 x 10-811,000 Cs-137 4 x 10
-4 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8367 Ru-106 2 x 10
-4 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8753 Cs-134 2 x 10
-4 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-85.24 Xe-133 2 x 10
-3 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7284 Ce-144 1 x 10
-4 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-860.2 Sb-124 4 x 10
-4 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-80.224 Cs-138 4 x 10
-3 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 TOTAL 8 x 10
-1 8 x 10-5 8 x 10-5 8 x 10-5 8 x 10-5 8 x 10-5 8 x 10-5 8 x 10-5 8 x 10-5 (Sheet 1 of 2)
Revision 5, June 1999 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.2-2
RADIONUCLIDE ACTIVITY OF SOLID RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL IN LIQUID RADWASTE TANKS BASED ON OPERATIONAL DATA (µCi in Solid Form/Tank)
Cleanup Phase Separators Condensate Phase Separators Condensate Backwash Rec. Tank Waste Sludge Tank Max-Recycle Spent Resin Tank Waste Demin Spent Resin Tank
Number of tanks 4 4 2 1 1 1
Expected µCi in solid form per tank 5 x 10 7 6 x 10 8 6 x 10 6 6 x 10 6 1 x 10 3 2 x 10 8 Expected average
µCi in solid form
per tank 5 x 10 6 6 x 10 7 2 x 10 5 3 x 10 5 6 x 10 7 1 x 10 6 Nuclides Cr-51 2 x 10 6 2 x 10 7 2 x 10 5 2 x 10 5 5 x 10 7 7 x 10 6 Mn-54 2 x 10 6 2 x 10 7 2 x 10 5 2 x 10 5 3 x 10 7 5 x 10 6 Co-58 6 x 10 5 7 x 10 6 7 x 10 4 7 x 10 4 1 x 10 7 2 x 10 6 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.2-2
RADIONUCLIDE ACTIVITY OF SOLID RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL IN LIQUID RADWASTE TANKS BASED ON OPERATIONAL DATA
(µCi in Solid Form/Tank) (Sheet 2 of 2)
Revision 5, June 1999 Error! Bookmark not defined.
Cleanup Phase Separators Condensate Phase Separators Condensat e Backwash Rec. Tank Waste Sludge Tank Max-Recycle Spent Resin Tank Waste Demin Spent Resin Tank Co-60 3 x 10 7 4 x 10 8 4 x 10 6 4 x 10 6 7 x 10 8 1 x 10 8 Zn-65 2 x 10 6 2 x 10 7 2 x 10 5 2 x 10 5 4 x 10 7 5 x 10 6 Cs-134 6 x 10 6 7 x 10 7 7 x 10 5 7 x 10 5 1 x 10 8 2 x 10 7 Cs-137 1 x 10 7 1 x 10 8 1 x 10 6 1 x 10 6 3 x 10 8 4 x 10 7 Ba/La-140 3 x 10 5 3 x 10 6 3 x 10 4 3 x 10 4 6 x 10 6 9 x 10 5 Sr-90 2 x 10 6 3 x 10 7 3 x 10 5 3 x 10 5 5 x 10 7 8 x 10 6 Pu-239, 240 9 x 10 3 1 x 10 5 1 x 10 3 1 x 10 3 2 x 10 5 3 x 10 4 Pu-238 2 x 10 4 2 x 10 5 2 x 10 3 2 x 10 3 4 x 10 5 6 x 10 4 Am-241 3 x 10 2 4 x 10 3 4 x 10 1 4 x 10 1 7 x 10 3 1 x 10 3 Cm-242, 243 3 x 10 3 3 x 10 1 3 x 10 2 4 x 10 2 5 x 10 4 8 x 10 3 Cm-244 2 x 10 3 2 x 10 4 2 x 10 2 2 x 10 2 3 x 10 4 5 x 10 3 (Sheet 1 of 1)
Revision 5, June 1999 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.2-3
PREDICTED ACTIVITY PRESENT IN WASTES TO BE DISCHARGED TO THE DIFFUSER PIPE OR DISCHARGE FLUME WEIR CONCURRENT WITH DESIGN BASIS FUEL LEAKS
Waste Type Daily Average Curies Daily Average Concentration Floor drains 0.08 Laboratory drains ~2 x 10
-8 µCi/cc Decontamination solutions [0.04]
- Laundry wastes 7 x 10
-5
- Only when chemical decontaminations are performed.
(Sheet 1 of 3)
Revision 5, June 1999 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.2-4
EXPECTED ACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN DISCHARGE BAY AND MISSISSIPPI RIVER
Isotope Half Life (Days)
Release Rate (Ci/yr)* Environmental Inventory Ci After 1 Yr MPC Per 10 CFR 20
(µCi/cc) Concentration After Mixing With Two Unit Circulating Water (µCi/cc)
- Maximum Expected Routine Concentration In Mississippi River
(µCi/cc) Expected Annual Average Concentration In Mississippi River (µCi/cc) Sr-91 .396 3.41 x 10
-3 0 5 x 10-5 2 x 10-12 3 x 10-13 8 x 10-14 Cs-134 753 2.49 x 10
+0 8.49 x 10
-3 9 x 10-6 1 x 10-9 2 x 10-10 6 x 10-11 Cs-137 11000 6.81 x 10
+0 6.66x 10+0 2 x 10-5 3 x 10-9 6 x 10-10 2 x 10-10 I-131 8.04 5.56 x 10
-2 1.17 x 10
-15 3 x 10-7 3 x 10-11 5 x 10-12 1 x 10-12 Co-58 70.8 3.36 x 10
-2 1.02 x 10
-3 9 x 10-5 2 x 10-11 3 x 10-12 9 x 10-13 Co-60 1930 2.80 x 10
+0 2.46 x 10
+0 3 x 10-5 1 x 10-9 3 x 10-10 7 x 10-11 Fe-59 44.6 LLD --- 5 x 10 -- --- --- Zn-65 244 2.12 x 10
-2 1.11 x 10
-2 1 x 10-4 2 x 10-11 3 x 10-12 7 x 10-13 Mn-54 312 1.04 x 10
-1 4.62 x 10
-2 1 x 10-4 5 x 10-11 1 x 10-11 2 x 10-12
- Release rate for 1980
- 1,000,000 gal/min Based on a very low flow of 12,000 ft
^3^/s Based on an average flow of 47,000 ft
^3^/s QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.2-4 (Continued)
EXPECTED ACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN DISCHARGE BAY AND MISSISSIPPI RIVER (Sheet 2 of 3)
Revision 5, June 1999
Isotope Half Life (Days)
Release Rate (Ci/yr)* Environmental Inventory Ci After 1 Yr MPC Per 10 CFR 20
(µCi/cc) Concentration After Mixing With Two Unit Circulating Water (µCi/cc)
- Maximum Expected Routine Concentration In Mississippi River
(µCi/cc) Expected Annual Average Concentration In Mississippi River (µCi/cc) Cr-51 27.7 LLD --- 2 x 10 -- --- --- Zr-95 64.0 9.50 x 10
-4 1.82x 10-5 6 x 10-5 5 x 10-13 5 x 10-14 2 x 10-14 Nb-95 35.2 LLD --- 1 x 10 -- --- --- Mo-99 275 LLD --- 4 x 10 -- --- --- Y-92 .148 9.30 x 10
-3 0 6 x 10-5 5 x 10-12 9 x 10-13 2 x 10-13 Ag-110m 251 7.47 x 10
-4 2.72 x 10
-4 3 x 10-5 4 x 10-13 7 x 10-14 2 x 10-14 Tc-99m 2.75 3.17 x 10
-4 3.29 x 10
-44 3 x 10-4 2 x 10-13 3 x 10-14 8 x 10-15 Ba-140 12.8 2.76 x 10
-1 7.10 x 10
-10 2 x 10-5 1 x 10-10 3 x 10^-11^ 7 x 10^-12^ I-135 .275 3.66 x 10
-3 0 4 x 10-6 2 x 10-12 3 x 10^-13^ 9 x 10^-14^ Cs-136 13.1 LLD --- 6 x 10 -- --- --- I-133 .867 1.99 x 10
-2 0 1 x 10-6 1 x 10-11 2 x 10-12 5 x 10-13 La-140 12.8 1.93 x 10
-1 4.96 x 10
-10 2 x 10-5 1 x 10-10 2 x 10-11 5 x 10-12 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.2-4 (Continued)
EXPECTED ACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN DISCHARGE BAY AND MISSISSIPPI RIVER (Sheet 3 of 3)
Revision 5, June 1999
Isotope Half Life (Days)
Release Rate (Ci/yr)* Environmental Inventory Ci After 1 Yr MPC Per 10 CFR 20
(µCi/cc) Concentration After Mixing With Two Unit Circulating Water (µCi/cc)
- Maximum Expected Routine Concentration In Mississippi River
(µCi/cc) Expected Annual Average Concentration In Mississippi River (µCi/cc) Ce-141 32.5 2.09 x 10
-3 8.653x 10
-7 9 x 10-5 1 x 10-12 2 x 10-13 5 x 10-14 Np-239 2.36 2.99 x 10
-2 7.67 x 10
-49 13 x 10-4 23 x 10-12 33 x10-13 73 x 10-14 Xe-133 5.24 8.38 x 10
-2 8.70 x 10
-23 1.2 x 10-4 4 x 10-11 8 x 10-12 2 x 10-12 Xe-135 .379 7.15 x 10
-2 0 4 x 10-5 5 x 10-11 7 x 10-12 2 x 10-12 H-3 4504 1.02 x 10
+1 9.74 x 10
+0 3 x 10-3 5 x 10-9 1 x 10-9 2 x 10-10 Sr-89 50.5 1.21 x 10
-2 8.04 x 10
-5 3 x 10-5 6 x 10-12 1 x 10-12 3 x 10-13 Sr-90 10593 5.79 x 10
-2 5.65 x 10
-2 4 x 10-5 3 x 10-11 5 x 10-12 1 x 10-12 TOTAL 23.4 19.0 --- 1 x 10
-8 2 x 10-9 5 x 10-10 (Sheet 1 of 4)
Revision 5, June 1999 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.2-5
ESTIMATED CURIE CONTENT FOR RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE TANKS IN THE TANK FARM SYSTEM Waste Sample* Floor Drain Sample River Discharge Laundry Sample Chem. Waste Sample River µCi/cc 10 CFR 20 MPC Number of tanks 2 2 1 1 1 --- ---
Estimated µCi (all tanks) 1 x 10 4 1 x 10 4 2 x 10 4 3 x 10 2 2 x 10 4 3 x 10 5 --- Estimated average µCi (all tanks) 2 x 10 3 2 x 10 3 3 x 10 3 5 x 10 1 2 x 10 3 1 x 10 3 --- Maximum volume (each) 22,000 21,000 65,000 1,000 5,000 5 x 10 12 cc/hr** --- Cr-51 5 x 10
-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5.5 x 10-11 2 x 10-3 Tc-99m 2 x 10
-6 2 x 10-6 2 x 10-6 2 x 10-6 2 x 10-6 2.2 x 10-10 3 x 10-4 I-131 4 x 10
-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4.4 x 10-11 3 x 10-7 Np-239 9 x 10
-7 9 x 10-7 9 x 10-7 9 x 10-7 9 x 10-7 9.9 x 10-11 1 x 10-4 Ce-143 1 x 10
-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1.1 x 10-12 4 x 10-5 Ru-105 3 x 10
-7 3 x 10-7 3 x 10-7 3 x 10-7 3 x 10-7 3.3 x 10-11 1 x 10-4 Ru-103 1 x 10
-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1.1 x 10-12 8 x 10-5 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.2-5 (Continued)
ESTIMATED CURIE CONTENT FOR RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE TANKS IN THE TANK FARM SYSTEM (Sheet 2 of 4)
Waste Sample* Floor Drain Sample River Discharge Laundry Sample Chem. Waste Sample River µCi/cc 10 CFR 20 MPC I-133 6 x 10
-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6.6 x 10-10 1 x 10-6 Ba-140 5 x 10
-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5 x 10-7 5.5 x 10-11 2 x 10-5 I-132 3 x 10
-9 3 x 10-9 3 x 10-9 3 x 10-9 3 x 10-9 3.3 x 10-13 8 x 10-6 W-187 7 x 10
-9 7 x 10-9 7 x 10-9 7 x 10-9 7 x 10-9 7.7 x 10-12 5 x 10-5 Zr-95 2 x 10
-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2.2 x 10-12 6 x 10-5 Mo-99 1 x 10
-6 1 x 10-6 1 x 10-6 1 x 10-6 1 x 10-6 1.1 x 10-10 4 x 10-5 Zr-97 2 x 10
-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2.2 x 10-11 2 x 10-5 Sr-91 6 x 10
-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6 x 10-6 6.6 x 10-10 5 x 10-5 Nb-95 1 x 10
-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1.1 x 10-12 1 x 10-4 Co-58 2 x 10
-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2.2 x 10-12 9 x 10-5 Mn-54 3 x 10
-8 3 x 10-8 3 x 10-8 3 x 10-8 3 x 10-8 3.3 x 10-12 1 x 10-4 Y-92 2 x 10
-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2.2 x 10-09 6 x 10-5 Fe-59 2 x 10
-9 2 x 10-9 2 x 10-9 2 x 10-9 2 x 10-9 2.2 x 10-12 5 x 10-5 I-135 1 x 10
-5 1 x 10-5 1 x 10-5 1 x 10-5 1 x 10-5 1.1 x 10-09 4 x 10-6 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.2-5 (Continued)
ESTIMATED CURIE CONTENT FOR RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE TANKS IN THE TANK FARM SYSTEM (Sheet 3 of 4)
Revision 5, June 1999 Co-60 2 x 10
-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2.2 x 10-11 3 x 10-5 Sr-92 7 x 10
-6 7 x 10-6 7 x 10-6 7 x 10-6 7 x 10-6 7.7 x 10-10 2 x 10-4 La-140 2 x 10
-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2.2 x 10-11 2 x 10-5 Zn-65 1 x 10
-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1.1 x 10-12 1 x 10-4 Nb-97 1 x 10
-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1.1 x 10-12 4 x 10-4 Xe-135 2 x 10
-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 2 x 10-5 1.1 x 10-9 4 x 10-5 Cs-136 1 x 10
-7 1 x 10-7 1 x 10-7 1 x 10-7 1 x 10-7 1.1 x 10-11 6 x 10-5 Na-24 4 x 10
-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4.4 x 10-11 3 x 10-5 Ce-141 8 x 10
-9 8 x 10-9 8 x 10-9 8 x 10-9 8 x 10-9 8.8 x 10-13 9 x 10-5 Ag-110m 8 x 10
-8 8 x 10-8 8 x 10-8 8 x 10-8 8 x 10-8 8.8 x 10-12 3 x 10-5 Cs-137 4 x 10
-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4.4 x 10-12 2 x 10-5 Ru-106 2 x 10
-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2.2 x 10-12 1 x 10-5 Cs-134 2 x 10
-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2 x 10-8 2.2 x 10-12 9 x 10-6 Xe-133 2 x 10
-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2 x 10-7 2.2 xx 10
-11 1.2 x 10-4 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.2-5 (Continued)
ESTIMATED CURIE CONTENT FOR RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE TANKS IN THE TANK FARM SYSTEM (Sheet 4 of 4)
Waste Sample* Floor Drain Sample River Discharge Laundry Sample Chem. Waste Sample River µCi/cc 10 CFR 20 MPC Ce-144 1 x 10
-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1 x 10-8 1.1 x 10-12 1 x 10-5 Sb-124 4 x 10
-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4 x 10-8 4.4 x 10-12 2 x 10-5 Cs-138 4 x 10
-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4 x 10-7 4.4 x 10-11 5 x 10-6 Totals 8 x 10
-5 8 x 10-5 8 x 10-5 8 x 10-5 8 x 10-5
- Data is from Unit 1 coolant isotopics, averaged for 1980 divided by 10,000 (average dilution factor).
- flow river cc/hr 10 x 5 + cc/gal 10 x 3.785 x flow .cond gal/hr 10 x 6.0 cc/gal 10 x 3.785 x gallons x Ci/cc 12 3 7 3µ (Sheet 1 of 1)
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.2-6 COMPARISON OF LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISCHARGES AND THEIR POTENTIAL EFFECTS ON ENVIRONMENT Environs Dose Rate (mrem/yr)
Fraction of Natural Background Exposure**
Case Dis. Flume Concen. (µCi/cc)
Dis. Period Activity Dis. (Ci/yr)
In Dis. Flume In River Min. Flow* In River Ave. Flow* In Dis. Flume In River at Ave. Flow* (hrs/day) (days/yr)
I. 10 CFR 20 - Identified Mixture-Maximum
Continuous Discharge
Legal Maximum 1.6 x 10-6 24 365 3200 500 89 23 3.6 0.16 II. 10 CFR 20 - Unidentified Mixture: A. Maximum per Tech Spec 10-7*** 24 365 200 30 5.4 1.4 0.018 0.0097 B. Expected Release -
with design basis fuel leaks 1 x 10-8*** As Required 365 24 2.9 --- --- --- ---
- Minimum Flow = 7 day low flow = 11,900 ft 3/s Average Flow = Average annual flow = 47,000 ft 3/s Doses calculated assume these flows persisted all year
- Natural background averages = 140 mrem/year
- Discharge flume concentration at 10
-7 µCi/cc during discharge, but actual MPC of mixture being discharged is ~1.6 x 10
-6 µCi/cc, and minimum MPC with no fission products is ~ 10
-5 µCi/cc.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 6, October 2001 11.3-1 11.3 GASEOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
This section describes the capabilities of the Quad Cities Station to control, collect, process, handle, and dispose of the gaseous radioactive waste generated as a result of normal
operation and anticipated operational occurrences.
[11.3-1]
The Unit 1 and 2 systems addressed in this section are the off-gas system, the turbine gland seal system, and the mechanical vacuum pump system.
The off-gas system collects, contains, and proc esses the radioactive gases extracted from the steam condenser. The gases are exhausted by the steam jet ejectors (see Section 10.4) and
flow through a preheater to a catalytic recomb iner where most of the hydrogen and oxygen present recombine to form steam. The steam is condensed for return as condensate and the noncondensible gases flow to a holdup pipe. The gas flow continues through a cooler condenser, moisture separator, electric reheaters, prefilter, activated carbon adsorbers, high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filt ers, and then to the 310-foot chimney for discharge to the environment. Two alternate o ff-gas system flow paths allow flow to bypass the catalytic recombiners, or the activated carbon adsorbers or both.
The turbine gland seal system provides steam to the shaft seals using steam to exclude air from the turbine cavities. The steam in the gas mixture is condensed and the air and
radioactive gases are discharged to the 310-foot chimney.
The mechanical vacuum pump system establishes and maintains the main condenser
vacuum when steam is not available. The vacuum pump effluent is discharged to the 310-
foot chimney.
11.3.1 Design Objectives
11.3.1.1 Off-Gas System
The design objectives of the off-gas handling system are:
[11.3-1a]
A. To provide effective control of proc ess off-gases with capability for preventing releases over limits defined in 10 CFR 20;
B. To minimize radioactive pa rticle release to the atmosphere;
C. To provide sufficient time for operat or decision and action when continuous monitoring indicates developmen t of off-standard conditions;
D. To minimize the release of normally occurring activation radiogases by suitable short-term decay; and
E. To minimize the hazard of explosion of hydrogen and oxygen gas in the off-gas system.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 6, October 2001 11.3-2 To achieve these objectives the air ejector off-g as system was designed using the following bases:
Design pressure 350 psig
Design flow rate (air ejector flow) 250 ft 3/min Nominal size of particulate removed 0.3 µm and greater Release point above ground 310 feet (chimney)
Piping design code USAS B31.1.0 (original system)
Subsection ND, Class 3 (Rechar
System) (Maintained to
The original off-gas system design was modifi ed in 1972 to reduce the radioactive gaseous effluent discharged from the chimney. The ne w design objectives were given as 10 mrem/yr for noble gases and 1.0 x 10
-5 times 10 CFR 20 limits for iodines.
[11.3-2]
11.3.1.2 Turbine Gland Seal System
The design objective and description for the tu rbine gland seal system are given in Section 11.3.2.2.
11.3.1.3 Mechanical Vacuum Pump System
The design objectives and description for the mechanical vacuum pump system are given in Section 11.3.2.3.
11.3.1.4 Plant Features to Minimize the Amounts of Radioactive Effluents
The plant design includes several specific feat ures or effects which minimize the amounts of radioactive materials released to the environment. These include:
[11.3-3]
A. The use of high-integrity Zircaloy-cl ad fuel rods to contain fission products within the fuel.
B. The water to steam partition, retaining halogens in the coolant.
C. The provision of 4-hour holdup of the off-gas to allow decay of short-lived products before discharge. This reduce s the potential radiation effects by a factor of approximately 10 as compared to a no holdup scheme and provides ample time to prevent release of fission product gases in excess of the
instantaneous permissible release rate limits.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 6, October 2001 11.3-3 D. The provisions for monitoring the air ejector off-gas stream and initiating automatic isolation of the holdup piping when the radioactivity level is high.
E. High efficiency filters at the end of the off-gas piping to remove particulate radioisotopes formed by the decay of th e noble gas radioisotopes in the holdup pipe.
F. Elevated release of gases from th e 310-foot chimney, which is approximately 1-1/2 times the height of nearby structure s, to reduce direct radiation dose rates on the ground and to maximize the atmospheric dispersion of the gas plume
before it reaches ground level.
G. Continuous monitoring of the chim ney effluent with appropriate alarms as a backup to the air ejector monitors.
11.3.2 System Description
There are eighteen sources of radioactive gaseous effluent all of which exhaust through the
310-foot chimney. The sources are listed below:
[11.3-4]
- 1. Off-gas system for Unit 1;
- 2. Off-gas system for Unit 2;
- 3. Turbine gland seal system for Unit 1;
- 4. Turbine gland seal system for Unit 2;
- 5. Mechanical vacuum pump system for Unit 1;
- 6. Mechanical vacuum pump system for Unit 2;
- 7. Standby gas treatment system (SBGTS) for Unit 1;
- 8. SBGTS for Unit 2;
- 9. Off-gas system recombiner r ooms' ventilation system for Unit 1;
10 . Off-gas system recombiner room s' ventilation system for Unit 2;
- 11. Turbine building ventilation system for Unit 1;
- 12. Turbine building ventilation system for Unit 2;
- 13. Off-gas building ventilation system; QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 13, October 2015 11-3-4 14. Radwaste building ventilation system;
- 15. Maximum recycle building ventilation system; and
- 16. Solidification building ventilation system;
- 17. High radiation sampling system (HRSS) building ventilation system for Unit 1; and 18. HRSS building ventilation system for Unit 2.
The off-gas system is discussed in Section 11.3.
2.1. The ventilation systems for the off-gas recombiner rooms for Units 1 and 2, the turbine building for Units 1 and 2, the off-gas
building, the radwaste building, the maximum recycle building, and the solidification
building are discussed in detail in Section 9.4.
The potentially radioactive ventilation air from the systems is discharged to the environment through the 310-foot chimney. The
SBGTS is discussed in detail in Section 6.5.
The SBGTS discharges treated radioactive gases to the environment through the 310-foot ch imney. The gland seal system for Units 1 and 2 and the mechanical vacuum pump system for Units 1 and 2 are discussed in Sections 11.3.2.2 and 11.3.2.3 respectively. The HRSS building ventilation system for Units 1 and 2
is discussed in Section 9.3.2.1.4.
11.3.2.1 Off-Gas System
11.3.2.1.1 Process Description
The off-gas system is shown in P&IDs M-42 and M-84. The main air ejectors, consisting of primary and secondary jets, remove the fission gases, activation gases, and radiolytic hydrogen and oxygen from the main condenser. The gaseous mixture is then routed
through the preheater and into the catalytic re combiner. Preheating the gaseous mixture is necessary to ensure optimum recombiner performance.
[11.3-5]
In the recombiner, most of the radiolytic hy drogen and oxygen are catalytically recombined to form water (in the form of superheated stea m). This steam, along with the steam used for dilution, trace quantities of unreacted hydrog en and oxygen, air, and radioactive gases, exits the recombiner to a condenser where the steam is condensed to liquid and returned to the reactor condensate system. The noncondensib le effluent is then routed to the holdup piping where the shorter-lived radioactive is otopes (principally N-13, N-16, 0-19, and certain isotopes of Xenon and Krypton) deca y to either nonradioactive isotopes or radioactive particulate daughter products.
[11.3-6]
Upon leaving the holdup pipe, the effluent is cooled further in the cooler condenser using a chilled glycol system for removal of water va por, passed through a moisture separator for further drying, and then heated in a reheater for humidity control. Before entering the charcoal adsorbers, the effluent is filtered to remove the previously noted particulate daughter products. Following the charcoal ad sorbers, the effluent is filtered again to remove particulate daughter products and then discharged through the 310-foot chimney.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 11, October 2011 11.3-5 The off-gas system provides ample monitoring and control to ensure that the limits set forth in 10 CFR 20 are not exceeded. The off-gas holdup pipe, effluent calibration of the
off-gas monitors, particulate filtering, and alar ms are all protective measures taken to meet the standards set by 10 CFR 20.
[11.3-7]
Shielding is provided for the off-gas system e quipment to maintain safe radiation exposure levels for plant personnel.
11.3.2.1.2 Description of Major Components
11.3.2.1.2.1 Steam Jet Air Ejectors
The steam jet air ejector (SJAE) is comprised of a 2-stage unit. The first stage (primary jet) utilizes an intercondenser while the second stage (secondary jet) serves as the booster air ejector to provide the fluid driving force. In this train, the after condenser is bypassed.
These stages remove the noncondensible gases from the condenser and provide flow to the off-gas systems. The steam jet driving flow is from the turbine throttle through a pressure regulating valve set at a minimum of 125 psig.
[11.3-8] [11.3-9]
A source for oxygen injection is provided to en sure that proportionate amounts of hydrogen and oxygen are available for recombination for both off-gas trainsfor both offgas trains.
11.3.2.1.2.2 Preheaters
The preheater is a U-tube heat exchanger usin g steam to superheat the off-gas mixture of steam and gases to ensure the absence of water which is a recombiner catalyst poison. The
preheaters are heated with steam rather t han electricity to eliminate the presence of potential ignition sources and to limit the temp erature of the gases in the event of cessation of gas flow.
11.3.2.1.2.3 Catalytic Recombiners
The gaseous hydrogen and oxygen is combined catalytically into superheated steam at a variable temperature. The inlet temperature to the recombiner is 350°F.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR 11.3-6 11.3.2.1.2.4 Off-Gas Condensers
The off-gas condenser is a U-tube heat exchang er which uses condensate water to cool and condense the steam in the off-gas piping.
11.3.2.1.2.5 Holdup Pipe
The radioactivity of the gaseous stream is redu ced in the off-gas system holdup pipe. The holdup allows the shorter-lived Xenons and Kryptons to decay to particulate daughter products. The removal of hydrogen and oxyge n as water increases the holdup time to approximately four hours as a result of the lowered flow rate.
11.3.2.1.2.6 Cooler Condensers
The cooler condenser, a multipass tube side he at exchanger, further cools the gas to remove as much moisture as possible. Cooling is supplied by a chilled ethylene glycol-water mixture.
11.3.2.1.2.7 Moisture Separators
A moisture separator removes entrained moistu re from the gas stream exiting the heat exchanger. Moisture separators are located at the exit of the off-gas condenser and the exit of the cooler condenser. Removal of conden sible water vapor and entrained moisture is essential because the activated carbon effici ency is a function of moisture content.
11.3.2.1.2.8 Reheaters
The electric reheater heats the off-gas stream to the optimal temperature for activated carbon adsorption. Heating of the off-gas stream to approximately 70°F assures that any residual water vapor does not interfere with the activated carbon adsorption process.
11.3.2.1.2.9 Prefilters
The prefilters consist of full-flow HEPA filters designed to remove 99.97% of the particulates in the off-gas greater than 0.3 µm in size.
[11.3-10]
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 6, October 2001 11.3-7 11.3.2.1.2.10 Charcoal Adsorbers
The charcoal adsorbers provide for radioactive decay of the major activation gases and fission gases in the main condenser off-gas. The adsorbers provide a retention time of 14.6
days for Xenon and 19.4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> for Krypton holdup. There are 12 charcoal adsorption beds.
Each bed is 4 feet in diameter with an over all height of 21 feet. The 12 charcoal beds contain approximately 74,000 pounds of charco al. The vessel is designed for 350 psig.
[11.3-11]
Although iodine input into the off-gas system is small by virtue of its retention in reactor water and condensate the charcoal will effective ly remove it by adsorption and prevent its release.
The charcoal adsorbers are designed to limit the temperature of the charcoal to well below the ignition temperature, thus precluding ov erheating or fire and consequent escape of radioactive materials. The charcoal adsorber s are located in a shielded room, maintained at a constant temperature by an air conditio ning system (see Section 9.4) designed to remove the decay heat generated in the adso rbers. The maximum centerline temperature of the charcoal is less than 10°F above room te mperature when the flow is stopped. The decay heat of 50 Btu/hr is sufficiently small compared to the thermal mass of the charcoal
vault. Even if vault cooling is lost, the te mperature rise will not be sufficient to cause charcoal ignition. The charcoal is maintained at 77°F by the vault air conditioning system.
Due to the thermal capacitance of the charco al beds and the massive concrete vault walls, temperature changes caused by failure of the vault air conditioning system will be sufficiently slow that the resulting changes in the charcoal adsorption coefficient will not produce a rapid release of adsorbed radioactive nuclides. In order to maintain consistent system operation, a redundant vault air cond itioning system is supplied to allow for maintenance and operational convenience. Duri ng a plant outage when the condenser is not maintained at vacuum, there is no gas flow through the charcoal and the holdup is very high, even if the charcoal reaches ambient temperatures. High radiation level in the charcoal bed vault will cause an alarm in the control room.
[11.3-12]
11.3.2.1.2.11 Afterfilters
These filters provide the final filtration of the off-gas before its release to the 310-foot chimney. [11.3-13]
The filters, located just before the chimney, consist of two parallel sets of full-flow, HEPA filters. The spare set of filt ers provides backup and assures availability of filtration. These filters are designed to remove 99.97% of the particulates in the off-gas greater than 0.3 µm in size. Static grounding wires are installed on the filter to minimize the potential for an off-gas explosion at this point. A loop seal wa s installed on the drain line from the filters to eliminate a leakage point for the radioactive gaseous effluent. The maximum operating
differential pressure across these filter units is 4 inches of water. The pressure switches alarm in the control room on high differential pressure across the filter unit.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 13, October 2015 11.3-8 11.3.2.1.3 Redundancy of Equipment
Redundancy of the air ejector, preheater, reco mbiner, off-gas condenser, water separator, cooler-condenser, moisture separator, particulate filters, and charcoal vault air conditioning units is provided for operating convenience and maintenance. Valving is provided for selecting either one or both recombiner trains. Each recombiner train consists of a
third-stage air ejector, preheater, recombiner , off-gas condenser, and a water separator, except for the 1B train which has no third-stage air ejector.
[11.3-14]
Either one or both cooler condenser trains (cool er condenser, moisture separator, reheater, and prefilter) may be selected for operation. Th e charcoal beds can be operated in one of three modes:
- 1. All 12 charcoal beds in series;
- 2. Three parallel strings of 4 charcoal beds; or
- 3. Bypassing of all 12 charcoal beds.
11.3.2.1.4 Alternate Off-Gas Discharge Pathway
An alternate pathway, P&IDs M-42 and M-84, exists for the radioactive gases from the steam jet air ejector to the main chimney for discharge to the environment which involves bypassing the hydrogen recombiners and the cha rcoal adsorbers. This train configuration establishes the original design pathway with only the holdup and discharge filters for capturing particulates in the gas stream. Us ing this alternate pathway, the radioactive gases entering the off-gas system are held up to allow decay of the short-lived isotopes before being discharged to the environment th rough the 310-foot chimney. The radioactive gases from the main condenser air ejectors are delayed a minimum of 30 minutes in
shielded piping before entering the filter system.
[11.3-15]
11.3.2.1.5 Instrumentation and Control
The activity of the effluent entering and leavin g the modified off-gas system is continuously monitored. This system is also monito red by flow, humidity, and temperature instrumentation, plus hydrogen analyzers and oxygen analyzer (see Section 5.4), for operation and control. Table 11.3-1 lists pr ocess instruments that cause alarms and notes whether the parameters are indicated or recorded in the control room.
[11.3-16]
The off-gas system operates at a pressure of approximately 5 psig or less so the differential pressure that could cause leakage is small. To preclude radioactive gas leaks, the system is welded wherever possible, and bellows seal valv e stems or equivalents are used. The entire system is designed to maintain its integrit y in the event of a hydrogen-oxygen explosion.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 6, October 2001 11.3-9 Operational control is maintained by the use of radiation monitors to keep the release rate within the limits established by the Technical Specifications. A radiation monitor at the beginning of the holdup pipe continuously mo nitors gaseous radioactivity release from the reactor and, therefore, continuously monitors the degree of fuel leakage and input to the charcoal adsorbers. This radiation monitor is used to isolate the off-gas system upon detection of high radioactivity to prevent unacce ptably high levels of radioactive gases from entering the plant vent chimney and being di scharged to the environment. A continuous gas sampling radiation monitor is also provided at the outlet of the charcoal adsorbers to continuously monitor the effluent of the o ff-gas system. This gas sampling radiation monitor is used to provide an alarm upon detecti on of high radiation in the off-gas system effluent. Provision is also made for samp ling of the influent and effluent gases.
[11.3-17]
To protect the recombiner, the dilution steam supply pressure is monitored and alarmed on low pressure. The recombiner temperatures are monitored and alarmed to indicate any deterioration of performance.
The holdup of the condenser air ejector radioa ctive off-gas provides sufficient time between detection and release to permit isolation of the holdup line. The holdup line is isolated to
prevent release of fission product gases when the monitor alarm/trip setpoints are exceeded. These trip setpoints are establis hed in accordance with the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) as required by the Technical Specifications. When a monitor trip occurs, the holdup line is automatically isolated after a 15-minute delay. This time
interval permits corrective action to be taken to avoid plant shutdown.
[11.3-18]
11.3.2.1.6 Inspection and Testing
The gaseous waste disposal systems are used on a routine basis and do not require specific testing to ensure operability. Monitoring equipment is calibrated and maintained on a specific schedule and on indication of malfunction.
[11.3-19]
The off-gas filters are replaced or changed over when the pr essure drop across the filter exceeds the normal operation range. Instrument ation is provided for checking the installed efficiency of the filters.
[11.3-20]
The off-gas systems are sampled weekly fo r performance and any adverse change is investigated further. Furthermore, the air dose due to release of radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents is determined on a monthl y basis by allocating the effluents between units and using the methods prescribed in th e offsite dose calculation manual (ODCM).
Doses due to the treated gases released to unrestricted areas, at or beyond the site boundary, are projected on a monthly basis in accordance with the ODCM methods of
calculation. To minimize the potential for an explosive gas mixture to develop, the off-gas holdup system is monitored by the explos ive gas monitoring system which is channel checked, functionally tested, and calibrate d per the Technical Requirements Manual. The radioactive gaseous radiation monitori ng instruments listed in the ODCM are demonstrated operable by performance or instrument check.
[11.3-21]
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 13, October 2015 11.3-10 11.3.2.2 Turbine Gland Seal System
11.3.2.2.1 System Description
The turbine gland seal system consists of the gland steam condenser and the gland steam
condenser exhauster. There are two turbine gland seal systems for each unit. The turbine
gland seal system provides a seal between th e moving shaft and the stationary casing parts of the turbine to prevent air inleakage to the turbine during operation. The seals basically consist of a series of close tolerance rings in the casing which surround the turbine shaft at
either end. By passing steam (at a pressure higher than atmospheric) from inside the casing through the seals, air is prevented from leaking into the turbine. Rather than
exhaust this gland seal steam to the turbine building atmosphere, normal steam turbine
design directs it to the gland steam conden ser along with substantial quantities of air, which are drawn through the outer seals. Approximately 95% of the steam used in the turbine gland seals is condensed in the gland steam condenser and returned to the unit condensate system. The remaining steam, air and noncondensibles (including any
radioactive gases) present in the gland steam are exhausted with nominal hold-up (approximately 1.75 minutes) to the plant chimney. The gland seal steam condenser
exhauster maintains a vacuum on the gland seal steam condenser and exhausts the
noncondensed portion of the gaseous volume to the holdup pipe prior to entering the chimney for discharge to the environment.
[11.3-22]
The effluents from the gland seal system cannot be routed to the air ejector recombiner and charcoal beds. The relative absence of hydrog en renders a recombiner useless for reducing the effluents from this system. In using c harcoal to delay radioactive noble gases the volume required for a given de lay time is directly proportional to the gas flow. The noncondensible air and gas flow from the gl and seals is about 30-50 times larger than the flow of noncondensibles exiting a recombiner in the off-gas system. Therefore, dynamic charcoal adsorption is not practical for treatme nt of the gland seal effluent discharged to the chimney. The shorter holdup time is ad equate because the activity present in this system is three orders of magnitude less than that from the condenser air ejector. The holdup time allows decay of N-16 and O-19, which have half-lifes on the order of seconds.
11.3.2.2.2 Description of Major Components
11.3.2.2.2.1 Turbine Gland Seal Steam Condenser
The condenser using cooling water through double-pass tubes condenses the steam in the
gas stream.
[11.3-23]
11.3.2.2.2.2 Turbine Gland Seal Steam Condenser Exhauster
The exhauster maintains a vacuum on the turbine gland seal steam condenser. The
exhauster vents to the 1.75-minute holdup volume.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 9, October 2007 11.3-11 11.3.2.3 Mechanical Vacuum Pump System
The mechanical vacuum pump system establishes and maintains the main condenser
vacuum at 20-25 inches of mercury. This system , which is used when steam to operate the air ejectors is not available, exhausts thro ugh a discharge silencing tank at about 2320 standard ft 3/min of gas (air) at 15 in.Hg. The pump discharges this flow of contaminated gaseous effluent to the base of the 310-foot chimney via the gland seal holdup piping.
There is one condenser vacuum pump and silencer for each unit.
[11.3-24]
11.3.3 Radioactive Releases
11.3.3.1 Plant Release Points
Radioactive gaseous releases to the environm ent occur from only two release points, the plant 310-foot chimney and reactor building ventilation stack.
[11.3-25]
11.3.3.1.1 Reactor Building Ventilation Stack
The reactor building ventilation system, includ ing the drywell ventilation system and the drywell purge system, discharges the vent ilation air and radioactive gases at an approximate flow rate of 209,000 ft 3/min for both units through the reactor building ventilation stack. The typical radioactive gases discharged on an annual basis, based on
historical data and pre-uprate conditions, ar e shown in Table 11.3-2. Core uprate to 2957 MWt is expected to increase the activity in th e gaseous effluents by the percentage of the uprate, i.e., 18%. The reactor building and dr ywell ventilation systems are discussed in greater detail in Section 9.4. The physical and process design characteristics of the two gaseous release points are shown in Table 11.3-3. The limitations for release of gaseous
effluents from the plant are set in the ODCM.
[11.3-26]
11.3.3.1.2 Plant 310-Foot Chimney
The ventilation system air flow through the chimney is approximately 300,000 ft 3/min during normal operation of both Units 1 and 2. The radioactive gaseous flow from the off-
gas system, the turbine gland seal systems and the SBGTS is estimated to be 12,000 ft 3/min during operation of both units. The radioa ctive gaseous system flows for the reactor building vent stack and the main chimney are shown on Figure 11.3-1 and in the ODCM.
[11.3-27]
Natural dispersion of gases into the atmosphere is achieved in an efficient manner by
discharge through the chimney. The combinatio n of its height, the exit velocity of the effluent, and the buoyancy of the exit gases, promotes favorable plume behavior for efficient dispersal. The height of the chimney assures that diffusion of the plume will not be
influenced by the eddy currents occurring ar ound the station structures. Based upon diffusion characteristics of the gases, and co nsidering the meteorolog ical characteristics of QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 7, January 2003 11.3-12 the site and surroundings, it is calculated that release from the top of the 310-foot chimney
contributes to a reduction in offsite ground-lev el concentration by a factor of approximately 100 as compared with release of the gaseous wastes at ground level.
The major source of gaseous waste activity is the steam jet air ejector effluent. Turbine building ventilation exhausts contribute large vo lumes of air to the chimney effluent but very little activity in comparison to the major sources. Like wise, reactor building ventilation exhausts contribute little activity vi a the reactor building vent stack. Drywell gases are purged and exhausted from the reacto r building vent stack to reduce residual airborne contamination prior to personnel acce ss. Provisions are made to automatically divert the purge exhaust through the SBGTS at a reduced flow rate corresponding to system capacity if activity is present in any significant quantity. These gases are then discharged from the ventilation chimney. Ai r ejector off-gases are normally expected to have the composition shown in Table 11.3-4.
The activation gases listed in Table 11.3-5 (principally N-13) are released from the chimney
at the rate of approximately 250 µCi/s per unit during rated power operation. The rate of release of these gases is proportional to the thermal output of the reactor and the holdup time in the system before release at the chimney.
The fission product gases may come from minor amounts of tramp uranium on the surface
of the fuel cladding, from imperfections, or from perforations which might develop in the fuel cladding. In the absence of fuel rod le aks, N-13 from the air ejector off-gases, and the N-16, O-19 from the gland seal system are the principal contributions to environs radiation dose. The aggregate of these three isotopes co rresponds to a radiation dose of less than 0.1 mrem/yr at the site boundary. If fuel rod leak s do occur, the noble radioactive gases, Xenon and Krypton, become the principal contributors.
The particulate daughter products of the noble gases are removed by the off-gas system c harcoal adsorbers and filters prior to release of gases to the chimney.
[11.3-28]
The principal gaseous isotopes from fission product sources which are discharged from the chimney are shown in Table 11.3-6. The emission rate of fission gases presented in Table
11.3-6 totals approximately 600 µCi/s and is re presentative of the total leakage during a year.
The most thorough tritium balance made on a BWR was made at Dresden Unit 1 by the
U.S. Public Health Service.
[1] This study suggests that the activation of deuterium in the coolant water within the reactor is probably the main source of tritium in the primary coolant. The formation rate was calculated to be 0.06 µCi/s for this 700 MWt reactor. The measured release rate of tritium in liquid radwaste was 0.05 µCi/s which accounted for approximately 90% of the release with about 10% leaving as gaseous waste. Thus, essentially all of the Dresden Unit 1 triti um formation can be accounted for by the activation of deuterium. This is further co nfirmed by tritium concentrations measured in the reactor water at other boilin g water reactors using zircalo y fuel with varying numbers of fuel failures. Based on these studies, the tritium formation rate in each Quad Cities unit is expected to be about 0.3 µCi/s.
[11.3-29]
Most tritium formed is recombined with oxygen to form tritiated water. This tritium is drained to the main condenser where it becomes condensate for the feedwater system. It is removed from the system by its radioactive deca
- y. The tritium which is not recombined is released from the main chimney.
[11.3-30]
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 7, January 2003 11.3-13 The limitations for release of gaseous effluents from the plant are set in the ODCM. These quantities of radioisotopes released provid e a dose rate in the unrestricted areas surrounding the site boundary (including at the site boundary) that is below the allowable limits set by 10 CFR 20 and 10 CFR 50. The me thodology for calculating the release doses is presented in the ODCM and applies methods and equations consistent with Regulatory Guides 1.109 and 1.111 and NUREG 0133. The typical annual gaseous release, including
tritium, from the plant chimney based on hist orical data and pre-uprate conditions is shown in Table 11.3-7. Core uprate to 2957 MW t is expected to increase the activity in the gaseous effluent by the percentage of the uprate, i.e., 18%.
[11.3-31]
11.3.3.2 Process Monitoring and Sampling
The gaseous effluent is sampled on a continuous basis at both points of release. Provisions are also available for sampling the gaseous effl uent manually using laboratory techniques.
The radioactive gaseous effluent can be sample d at various process points such as at the steam jet air ejector, the exit of the recombiner, the exit of the various carbon adsorption
beds and the chimney. The reactor building vent effluent is sampled continuously.
Provisions for laboratory sample analysis are al so included. Sampling also includes isotopic analyses and isokinetic sampling. Additional details of the process monitoring
instrumentation is given in Section 11.5.
[11.3-32]
A remote radioactive gaseous e ffluent monitoring system has been installed and housed in a specially constructed facility for the State of Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety as required by the Illinois Safety Preparedness Act No. 83-1342 of September 4, 1984. This
independent facility monitors the radioactive gases released from the chimney and relays the information directly to the IDNS office in Springfield, Illinois.
[11.3-33]
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR 11.3-14 11.3.4 References
11.3-2 Kahn, B., et al, "Radiological Surveillanc e Studies at a Boiling Water Nuclear Power Reactor," BRH/DER 70-l, March, 1970.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR (Sheet 1 of 1)
Revision 6, October 2001 Table 11.3-1
PROCESS INSTRUMENT ALARMS
Parameter Main Control Room Indicate d Recorded Recombiner inlet temperature - low X Recombiner catalyst temperature - high/low X Off-gas condenser drain well (dual) level - high/low X Off-gas condenser gas discharge temperature - high X Cooler - condenser discharge temperature - high X Glycol solution temperature - high/low X Glycol storage tank level - low Prefilter DELTA-P - high X Moisture (charcoal bed inlet) - high X Charcoal bed temperature - high X Charcoal vault temperature - high/low X Adsorber vault radiation - high X Adsorber outlet radiation - high/high-high Gas flow (post filter inlet) - high/low X High efficiency particulate air filters DELTA-P - high X (Sheet 1 of 2)
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.3-2 REACTOR BUILDING VENTILATION STACK TYPICAL ANNUAL GASEOUS EFFLUENTS
Nuclides Released Quantity, Ci/yr (A) Fission Gases Kr-85 <LLD
- Kr-85m <LLD Kr-87 <LLD Kr-88 <LLD Xe-133 <LLD Xe-135 1.78E-01 Xe-135m 4.93E-01 Xe-138 <LLD (B) Iodines I-131 2.62E-03 I-133 1.52E-03 I-135 1.69E-03 (C) Particulates Sr-89 5.54E-05 Sr-90 3.57E-06 Cs-134 <LLD Cs-137 2.63E-04 Ba-140 <LLD La-140 3.54E-05 Cr-51 1.06E-02 Mn-54 4.46E-03 Co-58 6.41E-04 Co-60 9.70E-03 I-131 <LLD Ag-110m <LLD (C) Particulates (continued) Zm-65 4.17E-05 Mo-99 4.17E-03 I-133 3.92E-05 I-135 1.23E-03 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.3-2
REACTOR BUILDING VENTILATION STACK TYPICAL ANNUAL GASEOUS EFFLUENTS (Sheet 2 of 2)
Nuclides Released Quantity, Ci/yr FE-59 3.03E-05 Nb-95 1.54E-05 HF-181 2.03E-05
- Based on 1990 Semi Annual Effluent Reports.
- LLD - Lower Limit of Detection.
(Sheet 1 of 1)
Revision 6, October 2001 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.3-3
PHYSICAL AND PROCESS CHARACTERISTICS OF GASEOUS RELEASE POINTS Characteristics Gaseous Release Point Chimney Reactor Building Vertical Stack* Height (above grade) 310 ft (95m) 159 ft (48m) Inside diameter 11 ft (3.35m) 9 ft (2.74m)
Exit velocity 70 ft/s (21.4 m/s) 54.8 ft/s (16.7 m/s)
Discharge volume 421,300 cfm 209,000 cfm Heat rate control 9 x 10 4 cal/sec at 399,900 cfm and is proportional to flow
---
_______________________________
- The reactor building vent stack itself is 55 feet tall and is mounted on the turbine building.
(Sheet 1 of 1)
Revision 7, January 2003 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Table 11.3-4
AIR EJECTOR OFF-GAS COMPOSITION
Flow Rate (ft 3/min at 130 o F, 1 atm.)
Hydrogen 81 Oxygen 40.5 Air (assumed condenser leakage) 18-42 Water vapor (to saturate) 33-37 Activated noble gases Negligible TOTAL 172.5 - 200.5
(Sheet 1 of 1)
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.3-5
TYPICAL OFF-GAS ACTIVATION GAS COMPOSITION FOR A SINGLE UNIT (Data must be doubled for Units 1 and 2 Combined Release Rates)
Isotope Half-Life Emission Rate µCi/s H-3 12.4 yr. 3 x 10
-2 N-17 14 sec. 1 x 10 0 N-16 7.35 sec. 1 x 10 0 O-16 29 sec. 1 x 10 0 N-13 10 min. 2 x 10 2 Ar-41 1.83 hr. 2 x 10 1 Ar-37 34.3 day 1 x 10
-4 (Sheet 1 of 1)
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR
Table 11.3-6
TYPICAL OFF-GAS FISSION GAS COMPOSITION
Isotopes Half-Life Days Emission Rate µCi/s Xe-135m 0.0106 5 x 10 1 Xe-138 0.0098 1 x 10 2 Kr-87 0.053 2 x 10 1 Kr-88 0.118 9 x 10 1 Kr-85m 0.187 6 x 10 1 Xe-135 0.379 1 x 10 2 Xe-133 5.24 1 x 10 2
(Sheet 1 of 1)
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Table 11.3-7 TYPICAL MAIN CHIMNEY ANNUAL CHIMNEY GASEOUS EFFLUENTS
- Nuclides Released Quantity, Ci/yr (A) Fission Gases Kr-85 <LLD Kr-85m 9.88 x 10
-1 Kr-87 1.93 x 10 0 Kr-88 1.10 x 10 0 Xe-133 4.48 x 10 0 Xe-135 2.54 x 10 0 Xe-135m 9.87 x 10 0 Xe-138 4.25 x 10 1 Ar-41 1.10 x 10 0 (B) Iodines I-131 1.87 x 10
-3 I-133 7.77 x 10
-3 I-135 1.34 x 10
-2 (C) Particulates Sr-89 1.54 x 10
-3 Sr-90 1.04 x 10
-5 Cs-134 <LLD
- Cs-137 9.70 x 10
-6 Ba-140 7.51 x 10
-4 La-140 3.24 x 10
-3 Cr-51 1.02 x 10
-4 Mm-54 1.56 x 10
-4 Co-58 <LLD Co-60 3.97 x 10
-4 I-131 1.65 x 10
-4 Ag-110m <LLD Mo-99 2.19 x 10
-4 I-133 1.21 x 10
-3 I-135 2.09 x 10
-3 Fe-59 1.29 x 10
-5 (D) Tritium H-3 1.16 x 10 2
- Based on 1990 Semi-annual Effluent Reports.
- LLD - Lower limit of detection.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR 11.4-1 Revision 8, October 2005 11.4 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
This section describes the capabilities of the st ation to collect, process, and package wet and dry solid radioactive waste generated as a result of normal operation, including anticipated operational occurrences for shipment to burial or onsite storage.
The in-plant cement solid waste system presen tly installed is no longer used. Contract services are normally used in lieu of the in-p lant cement solid waste system for processing Class A unstable waste and waste which require s stability for burial offsite. The process control program (PCP) is used as applicable to process all low level radioactive wet wastes to meet the applicable federal, state, and burial site requirements.
[11.4-1]
The PCP contains the current formulas, analysis , test, and determinations to be made to ensure that processing of solid radioactive waste based on demonstrated processing of actual or simulated wet solid radioactive wast es will be accomplished in such a way as to assure compliance with 10 CFR Parts 20, 61, and 71, state regulations, burial ground
requirements, and other require ments governing the disposal of solid radioactive waste.
[11.4-1a]
Changes to the PCP are documented and record s of reviews performed are retained. This documentation contains: sufficient informatio n to support the change together with the appropriate analyses or evaluations justifying the change(s); and, a determination that the change will maintain the overall conformance of the solidified waste product to existing requirements of Federal, State, other applicabl e regulations. The changes to the PCP shall become effective after review and acceptance, including approval by the Station Manager.
Written procedures have been established, implemented, and maintained covering the activities of the PCP.
11.4.1 Design Objectives
The design objective of the solid radioactive wa ste disposal system is to process, package and provide facilities for tempor ary storage of solid wastes prior to shipment from the station for offsite disposal. These solid ra dioactive wastes are shipped offsite, for subsequent disposal, on vehicles suitable to comply with limits set forth by NRC, DOT, and state regulations.
[11.4-2]
11.4.2 System Description
The processing, packaging and handling, prior and subsequent to shipping or on-site storage, are performed in shielded and ve ntilated facilities and using procedures, the objectives of which are to minimize personne l radiation exposure and prevent spillage of radioactive wastes, while simultaneously providing for necessary cleanup and for equipment maintenance.
[11.4-3]
The reactor wastes such as spent control rod blades and fuel channels, are stored for decay in the fuel storage pool, or packaged, and transferred to permanent disposal offsite in suitable approved shipping containers.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 13, October 2015 11.4-2 The maintenance wastes such as contaminated clothing, tools, paper, and plastic can be
compressed in approved drums for disposal offsite.
The process wastes such as filter sludges and spent resins, are collected in tanks. These wastes can be solidified in 55 gallon drums, steel liners, or high integrity containers (HIC).
HICs can be dewatered onsite , partially dewatered onsite, and shipped offsite for final dewatering, or shipped offsite for complete dewatering. Chem ical treatment of the HICs may be performed if the presence of biologic al activity is detected. The drum filling equipment is operated remotely with view ers, and conveyors that transport the drums through the drum filling line and within the storage areas. The steel liners or high integrity containers (HIC) are processed in a tru ck mounted shipping ca sk or process shield.
The following are typical of wet and dry solid radioactive wastes:
[11.4-4]
A. Filter sludges;
B. Spent resins;
C. Air filters from off-gas and radioactive ventilation systems;
D. Contaminated clothing, tools, and small pieces of equipment which cannot be economically decontaminated;
E. Miscellaneous paper, rags, plastic, etc., from contaminated areas;
F. Dry wastes from equipment that has been activated during reactor operation;
G. Oily sludges; and
H. Cartridge filter elements.
11.4.2.1 In-Plant Cement Solid Waste System
During early plant history the cement solid waste system was used to solidify class A unstable waste forms. Due to improvements in current dewatering technology, this system is no longer used at Quad Cities Station.
[11.4-5]
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 6, October 2001 11.4-3 11.4.2.2 Contractor Supplied Solidification System
Contractor solidification services may be ut ilized at the station for wastes which are required to be classified as stable waste pe r 10 CFR 61 and/or the burial site licenses.
These services may also be used to process wastes that are not required to be stable.
Vendor procedures and the process control pr ogram are reviewed to assure compatibility with the station systems and procedures. Sp ecific station procedur es are developed and approved prior to use of the contract services.
[11.4-6]
The waste to be processed by this system is transferred to the mixing tank where it is concentrated by a series of fills and decant ations. The waste is then transferred to a disposable liner or HIC where the appropriate contractor solidification materials are added to solidify the radioactive waste. In certain cases (for example, waste resulting from tank cleaning), the waste is sent directly to the disp osable waste container. After solidification is completed, the liner is closed, surveyed, and eith er shipped for offsite burial or stored onsite in the Interim Radwaste Storage Facility (IRSF).
11.4.2.3 Contractor Supplied Dewatering System
Contractor dewatering services may be used at the station in lieu of solidification for stable and unstable waste forms. The wastes consid ered for dewatering are ion exchange bead resins, charcoal, sludge, and filter precoat me dia. The liner or high integrity container (HIC) is normally shipped to the plant in a suitable transportation cask. The filling head is positioned on the liner or HIC and the transfer and dewatering process is started. The
contractor receives waste from the station radw aste mixing tank via the radwaste pump or other appropriate method (e.g., chemical deco n resin columns). After the radwaste has been transferred to the liner or HIC, the balanc e of the dewatering process is completed by the contractor. The liquid waste resulting fr om this process is returned to the liquid radwaste system. Upon completion of the de watering process, the filling head is removed and the container is inspected to verify that it is acceptable.
[11.4-7]
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 9, October 2007 11.4-4 Samples are obtained and the container is ca pped, secured, and surveyed. The container may be stored in the interim radwaste storag e facility shipped for offsite dewatering and possible chemical treatment, or shipped to the burial site.
11.4.2.4 Contractor Encapsulation of Waste
Contractor encapsulation services may be ut ilized by the station for waste which are required to be classified as stable waste pe r 10 CFR 61 and/or burial site licenses. The contractor supplied procedures or other docume nts which support the encapsulation process are used by the station to prep are specific station procedures for review, prior to use, to assure compatibility with the st ation systems and procedures.
[11.4-8]
The item to be encapsulated is placed inside an approved liner and the liner is filled with a stable formula of cement. After sufficient coo ling, the encapsulation is inspected and the container is capped, secured, surveyed and ship ped for burial or stored onsite in the Interim Radwaste Storage Facility (IRSF).
11.4.2.5 Dry Active Waste
Dry active waste (DAW) occu rs from many sources:
[11.4-9]
A. Air filters from the off-gas systems;
B. Air filters from the various plant ventilation systems;
C. Air filters from the standby gas treatment systems;
D. Contaminated clothing, tools, and small equipment;
E. Miscellaneous contaminated paper, rags, plastic, wood, etc.; and
F. Contaminated concrete chippings and dirt.
The dry active waste is collected from throug hout the plant and normally taken to the Laundry, Tool, and Decontamination (LTD) Buildin g compactor area. When the activity is greater than the level acceptable for packaging in the LTD Building, the waste is then
taken to the radwaste building to be packaged into 55-gallon drums.
The activity of dry active waste is norma lly low enough to permit handling by manual contact. These wastes are collected in contai ners located in appropriate zones around the plant, as dictated by the volume of wast es generated during plant operation and maintenance. The containers or their conten ts are then collected and moved to the LTD Building. At this location, the dry active waste can be packaged by various methods.
Noncompressible wastes can be handpacked in to metal boxes or loaded into C-vans.
Compressible wastes can be compacted into dr ums by a hydraulic press to reduce their volume or can be handpacked into metal boxe s or C-vans. Metal boxes or drums can be stored in the LTD Building or DAW Building, shipped offsite for burial, or shipped to a waste processing facility. C-vans are normally shipped offsite to a waste processing facility.
Ventilation is provided to maintain control of contaminated QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 5, June 1999 11.4-5 particles when operating packaging equipmen t or during equipment maintenance and also cleanup. [11.4-10]
Equipment too large to be handled in this wa y will require special procedures. Since the need for handling of large equipment is quite infrequent, providing storage facilities in advance is not justified. Handling of such equipment depends upon the radiation level, transportation facilities, and available st orage sites. Suitable procedures for decontamination, shielding, shipment, and storage of such items are developed as necessary.
[11.4-11]
11.4.2.6 Waste Water Treatment and/o r Sewage Treatment Plant Sludge
Waste water treatment sludge is transferred to a drying area while sewage treatment sludge may either be land applied or transferred to a drying area. If drying of the sludge is utilized, the dried sludge is packaged by plant personnel in 55-gallon drums or other suitable waste container. The drums or other waste containers are closed and secured and moved to a transport vehicle or storage area to await inspection and shipment. Inspection verification of an acceptable product for shipme nt and burial is normally made at the time the transporting vehicle is loaded.
[11.4-12]
11.4.2.7 Classification of Radioactive Wet Waste
Radioactive wet wastes which are solidified or dewatered are classified as either Class A, Class B, or Class C to determine the accept ability for disposal and for the purpose of segregation at the disposal site. The waste class is based on the concentration of certain
radionuclides in the waste as outlined in 10 CFR 61.55. The most commonly used methods
for waste classification are the direct measurement of individual radionuclides and the use
of scaling factors to determine the radionuclid e concentration. Station procedures are used to determine the radionuclide concentration for the classification of radioactive waste for burial. [11.4-13]
11.4.3 Inspection and Testing
Proper operation of this equipment is de monstrated prior to the actual handling of radioactive wastes. Normal operations pr eclude the necessity for testing equipment continually in use. Periodic inspection is pe rformed, and equipment that is operated only periodically is tested as necessary to assure proper operation of valves and equipment to minimize the chance of failure or malfunction during operation.
[11.4-14]
If the in-plant solidification process is in use, each drum of solidified waste is verified to be void of freestanding water prior to shipping or storage. If a drum is found to contain freestanding water, dry cement will be added to solidify the free water or the drum will be recycled through the mixing line as required.
Drums of solidified waste will not be shipped with more than 0.5% freestanding water.
[11.4-15]
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR 11.4-6 Revision 8, October 2005 When using an onsite contractor's solidification system, a visual inspection of the waste
container contents is performed by both th e contractor and station personnel prior to installing the lid. The visual inspection in conjunction with the co ntractor's PCP verifies that the product is acceptable. If the contracto r's PCP or visual inspection does not verify solidification, the contractor will be required to provide the station an acceptable resolution.
When using an onsite contractor's dewateri ng system, verification of an acceptable dewatered product is performed by both the contractor and station pe rsonnel according to the contractor's and station procedures. The a cceptance criteria is dependent upon the type of dewatering system used and the material dewatered.
When contractor encapsulation is performed, a vi sual inspection of each liner is performed to verify encapsulation prior to installing the lid. The visual inspection verifies that the product meets the acceptance criteria of the con tractor's procedures. If the liner is not an acceptable product, the contractor will be requi red by the station to provide an acceptable resolution.
11.4.4 Storage of Solid Radwaste
Solid radwaste may be stored in several pl aces onsite while awaiting shipment. The storage place depends upon the particular type of solid waste.
[11.4-16]
11.4.4.1 Drummed Solidified Bead Resin
QCNPS no longer solidifies bead resin or ot her radioactive wastes. Although a General Electric in-plant cement solidification system was installed during initial construction and utilized for many years, QCNPS currently uses only commercial, vendor-supplied processing systems for the processing of the li quid wastes generated by the station. The GE in-plant cement system had initially functi oned as intended; however, due to changing regulations on waste forms, its use was event ually restricted to processing only wastes which did not require stability, which accounts for only a small fraction of the total wet wastes. If solidification or encapsulation is to be performed onsite at QCNPS, then specific station procedures shall be developed as well as appropriate revisions made to the Process Control Program (PCP).
[11.4-17]
11.4.4.2 Drummed Dry Active Waste
The DAW drums are normally stored in a desi gnated storage area ne ar the Laundry, Tool, and Decontamination (LTD) Building processing area if the waste is <=100 mrem/hr or in the DAW storage facility for on-s ite storage. The DAW may be stored in various work areas while waiting to be moved to the process area.
If the DAW radiation level is >100 mrem/hr, the DAW is normally stored in the radwaste building drum storage areas, or in the DAW storage facility with Radiation Protection approval.
[11.4-18]
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 13, October 2015 11.4-7 11.4.4.3 Dry Active Waste Boxes
The filled DAW boxes are normally stored either in the designated storage area near the LTD Building process area or may be stored in various waste locations while awaiting shipment or may be stored in the DAW storag e facility for on-site storage. Waste placed into the boxes is normally <=100 mrem/hr. Waste >100 mrem/hr can be placed into DAW
boxes and placed in the DAW storage fac ility with Radiation Protection approval.
[11.4-19]
11.4.4.4 Contractor Solidified, Dewa tered, or Encapsulated Waste
Contractor solidified, dewatered, or encapsul ated waste containers are normally shipped when processing is completed. If storage is required for any of these types of wastes, the containers of waste may be stored onsite, in the IRSF.
[11.4-20]
11.4.4.5 Interim Radwaste Storage Facility The interim radwaste storage facility (IRSF) is located inside the protected area and is used to temporarily store solid waste. The IRSF building is a stand-alone, reinforced concrete building.
The general layout of the IRSF is shown on drawing B-1804. The major IRSF areas are the truck bay, control room, equipment room, and storage bay. The truck and storage bays are serviced by a 20-ton crane. Remote cameras ar e used to aid in the operation of the crane.
The IRSF is designed for storage of radioactive waste in a ready-to-ship form. The IRSF is designed to store 416 containers. The contai ners are generally expected to average below 15 R/hr on contact.
11.4.4.6 Dry Active Waste Storage Faciltiy The DAW Building is located inside the owner controlled area. The DAW Building is a pre-engineered metal sided, cleared-span, steel frame building.
The metal drums and boxes intended for use in the DAW facility shall meet "General Design" (formerly Strong Tight) requirements at a minimum.
DAW containers are generally expected to av erage less than or equal to 30 millirem per hour at contact. This is based on filling th e DAW Storage facility with approximately four years of generated DAW having an isotopic a ctivity of 1.10 millicurie per cubic foot.
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Revision 13, October 2015 11.4-8 11.4.5 Shipping of Radioactive Waste
The solid radioactive waste is shipped from the plant to burial sites licensed and available
to receive such material. Wastes that need further processing may be shipped via an offsite vendor. The typical volumes of solid radioactive waste shipped from the station based on
historical data and pre-uprate conditions ar e given in Table 11.4-1. Core uprate to 2957 MWt will not significantly impact these estimates.
[11.4-21]
Each burial site requires the shipper to obtain a burial permit before the site will accept solid waste.
[11.4-22]
The lower activity radioactive wastes are normally loaded onto unshielded shipping vehicles for transporting to waste processors or a burial site. Higher activity wastes are normally shipped in an appropriate shielded ca sk on a transport vehicle. Procedures cover the various aspects of loading different types of shipping casks and different types of trucks, trailers, or C-vans with specific types of wast es. The marking of containers, the shipping papers, the determination of the radionuclides, and classification of the waste are all
described and performed according to station procedures.
[11.4-23] 11.4.6 Process Sampling
Process waste is sampled to determine the cl assification discussed previously and to determine the quantity of radionuclides (Ci of acti vity) to be shipped in the container. If onsite contractor solidification services are ut ilized, sampling is performed as necessary to determine the appropriate formula for solidific ation. Onsite sampling is performed in accordance with station procedures.
[11.4-24]
11.4.7 Planning
Planning and scheduling are exercised in coor dination with shipping contractors for the movement of waste packaged by the station or by a contractor. Planning is essential when the contractor is performing the containerizati on of the waste and the transporting of the packaged waste in one all-encompassing operat ion. The radwaste system planning is done to assure that wastes are processed in a time ly manner to assure that station operations, refueling, and maintenance activities are coordinated.
[11.4-25] 11.4.8 References
None
(Sheet 1 of 1)
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Table 11.4-1
TYPICAL VOLUMES OF RADIOACTIVE SOLID WASTE SHIPPED FROM THE STATION
Year Volume (Cubic Feet)
Radioactivity (Milli Curies) 1985 42,508.30 55,401,907.86 1986 46,518.40 2,136,314.06 1987 32,459.80 28,815,338.19 1988 31,281.50 637,386.49 1989 34,569.10 133,112,042.77 1990 42,697.30 1,240,311.71
(Sheet 1 of 3)
Revision 6, October 2001 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Table 11.5-1 RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEM PRINCIPAL DESIGN PARAMETERS
DETECTING General Monitoring Type Type Radiation Detected Detector Sensitivity Maximum Temperature °F Relative Humidity Check Source Energy Response Air ejector off-gas Radioactive gas Ionization chamber Gamma 3.7x10
-10 Amps/R/hr +/-20% 110 98 Built-in electronic Radioactive effluent gas Radioactive gas Scintillation Gamma Per ODCM requirements 110 98 Built-in radiation Main steam line Area Ionization chamber Gamma 3.7x10
-10 Amps/R/hr +/-20% 110 98 Built-in electronic Process liquid/radwaste Liquid effluent Scintillation Gamma Per ODCM requirements 110 98 Built-in electronic 70 keV - 7 MeV Process gas Radioactive gas G-M tube Gamma Refuel floor Rad Monitors: <
1 mR/hr RB Vent Rad Monitors: <
0.01 mR/hr 140 98 Manual radiation built-in electronic 80 keV - 7 MeV Area radiation
monitoring system
all channels Area G-M tube Gamma < Bottom of Range per Tables 12.3-3, 12.3.-4, and 12.3-5 140 98 Manual radiation Built-in electronic 80 keV - 7 MeV Environs radiation
monitoring system
all channels Air particulate Beta gamma (Sheet 2 of 3)
Revision 6, October 2001
QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Table 11.5-1 (Continued)
RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEM PRINCIPAL DESIGN PARAMETERS
INDICATING ANNUNCIATING Type Scale Power Location Type Location Alarm Hi Low Air ejector off-
gas Picoammeter 10 10 3 R/hr Log Station supplied Remote in control room Visual and audioRemote in control room X Radioactive effluent gas Count rate meter 10 10 6 cps Log Station supplied Remote in control room Visual and audioRemote in control room X Main steam line Picoammeter 10 10 3 R/hr Log Station supplied Remote in control room Visual and audioRemote in control room X Process liquid/radwaste Count rate meter 10 - 10 6 cpm Log Station supplied Remote in control room Visual and audioRemote in control room X Process gas Count rate meter 10 10 2 (RB Vent) 10 0 - 10 6 (Refuel floor) Station supplied Remote in control room Visual and audioRemote in control room X Area radiation monitoring
system all
channels Count rate meter Various Log Station supplied Remote in control room Visual and audioRemote in control room same local X
(Sheet 3 of 3)
Revision 9, October 2007 QUAD CITIES - UFSAR Table 11.5-1 (Continued)
RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEM PRINCIPAL DESIGN PARAMETERS
RECORDING SAMPLING CONTROLLING Type Response Scale Location Measured Media Air ejector off-gas Recorder Chart speed 1 in./hr per speed 1 or 5 s/scale 6 Decade log Off line Air Isolates off-gas isolation valve Radioactive effluent gas Recorder Chart speed 2 in./hr 7 Decade log Off line Air shielded Main steam line Recorder Chart speed 1 in./hr per speed 1 or 5 s/scale 6 Decade log In line Steam Trips cond. Vac. pump Process liquid and radwaste Recorder (2)
Chart speed 2 in./hr per speed 1 or 5 s/scale 5 Decade log In line Water Process gas Recorder (RB Vent Rad Monitors only) Chart speed 2 in./hr per speed 1 or 5 s/scale 4 Decade log in Air Area radiation monitoring system all channels 40-point multipoint recorder Chart speed 2 in./hr Various Log Air