ML17292B480

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Expresses Appreciation for to Chairman Jackson Re Interest in Nuclear Power & for Sharing Thoughts on NRC Oversight of Nuclear Power Industry.Nrc Response to Plant Event Discussed
ML17292B480
Person / Time
Site: Columbia 
Issue date: 12/18/1998
From: Holahan G
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Tom Gurdziel
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
References
NUDOCS 9812240048
Download: ML17292B480 (5)


Text

8 REGIj~

Cy

  • 0O Ol0

+~

~0

++*++

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON> D.C. 2055&0001 December 18, 1998 Mr. Thomas Gurdziel 9 Twin Orchard Drive Oswego, NY 13126

Dear Mr. Gurdziel:

Thank you for your letter of November 5, 1998, to Chairman Jackson expressing your interest in nuclear power and for sharing your thoughts with us on NRC oversight of the nuclear power industry. Since your letter deals with matters primarily within the purview of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, I have been asked to respond to you. You requested clarification of some risk terminology, the rationale for our judgment concerning a risk analysis of boiling water reactor (BWR) vessel failure frequency, our views on how the NRC may continue to carry out its mandate when faced with shrinking resources, and our response to an event at Washington Nuclear Project, Unit 2.

With regard to terminology specifically, definitions of "risk-informed" and "risk-based," and why we are making the transition to risk-informed regulation and not to risk-based regulation I offer the following comments.

The term "risk-informed" expresses the NRC's determination to base technical decisions on the results of traditional engineering evaluations that are augmented by quantitative and qualitative insights about the risk significance.

In general, risk insights are developed through the use of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA).

"Risk-based" refers to a process whereby technical decisions would be based primarily or exclusively on the results of risk assessments.

There are many reasons for our decision to embark on a long-term and ambitious transition to risk-informed regulation.

Chief among these is that this avenue acknowledges that we have a sound body of regulations that have served us well, as evidenced by the excellent safety record of the industry, which can be maintained, and in some instances, improved by sharpening our focus on and enhancing our understanding of safety issues through the incorporation of risk insights.

Concerning the BWR Vessel and Internals Project study, BWRVIP-05, submitted in support of proposed modiTications to programs for inspecting welds in the shells of BWR pressure vessels, the NRC staff did not accept the industry's initial estimates of crack frequency.

The staff performed an independent analysis of the issue, a not uncommon practice when important issues are involved and the staff has concerns about reported results.

As a result of the staffs analysis and further discussion with the licensees involved, upper bound estimates of "end of vessel life"failure frequencies were obtained (approximately 8 E-08 failures per reactor-year for

'ircumferential welds and 4 E-04 for axial welds, where it was conservatively assumed that the flaws in the axial weld with the limiting material properties and chemistry are all located at the inside surface of the vessel, and that after initial inspection there are no weld inspections throughout vessel life). These values were used in determining that inspection of circumferential welds could be relaxed (allowing permanent relief from inservice inspection requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g)), and that requirements for inspection of axial welds could

~ QV:

qy-z.vy QS 98i2240048 98i2i8 PDR ADQCK 050003'P7 P

PDR

ir

Mr. Thomas Gurdziel time. The BWRVIP is expected to provide the NRC with follow-up analyses that would remove conservative assumptions and better estimate the vessel failure frequency for axial welds.

The NRC staff must continue to protect public health and safety without compromise and, at the same time, adapt to a reduction in our resources.

I would agree that we cannot continue to do the same activities the same way with fewer resources.

We can do more of the tasks important to safety by doing less of the activities not as important to safety. We are making a major step toward developing the capacity to accurately and routinely make such distinctions by proceeding with the expeditious yet deliberate transition to risk-informed regulation.

Also, to be better able to meet the demands of today, as previously mentioned, and the challenges of tomorrow, to the extent we can anticipate them, we are in the process of reorganizing the agency.

With regard to timeliness, the staff continues to strive to make correct decisions about when an assessment is sufficient for a particular application, a sometimes difficulttask, which can often be made more tractable with the application of risk assessment.

In addition, we anticipate that our reorganization willimprove matters.

Finally, concerning the June 17, 1998, fire water flooding event, an augmented inspection team (AIT)was sent to the site to examine the facts surrounding the event.

Although the event did not pose a risk to public health and the actual safety consequences were minimal because there was no fire and the reactor had been shut down for an extended period of time, the staff does consider the event significant for its potential impact on safety. After a follow-up inspection conducted in September identified several organizational performance weaknesses, the staff cited three violations in a Notice of Violation and the licensee took corrective actions.

Once again, thank you for your comments.

Sincerely, 0>'~"!nai signed by Gary M. Holahan, Director Division of Systems Safety and Analysis Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

  • See previous concurrences.

Distribution: See next page SPSB:DSSA SPSB:DSSA AEI-Bassioni*

RBarrett*

12/8 /98 12/8 /98 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY DOCUMENT NAME: G:iGT980692.RES SPSB:DSSA JSchiffgens*

12/7/98 TECH ED.

RSanders*

12/8/98 D:DSSA GHolahan" 12/9/98

NRR S

Ilins 12/

+8 T:NRR B

eron 12/

/98

4 T

/

DISTRIBUTIONfor SJackson Scollins JBlaha BBoger SBurns BSheron GHolahan JRoe PMagnanelli RZimmerman JSchiffgens NRR Mailroom AEI-Bassioni WTravers RBarrett MKnapp SPSB Ticket File HThompson PNorry

~LFILE CENTER/

NRC PDR Green Ticket 980692