ML17292B375
| ML17292B375 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 05/06/1998 |
| From: | Poslusny C NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9805190076 | |
| Download: ML17292B375 (22) | |
Text
Nay 6, 1998 LICENSEE:
Washington Public Power Supply System FACILITY:
WNP-2
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF MEETING WITH WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM ON MARCH 30, 1998 On March 30, 1998, Washington Public Power Supply System and the NRC staff met to discuss the status and schedule for the licensee's program for upgrading the Nuclear Project No. 2 (WNP-2) Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). Enclosure 1 is a list of those who attended the meeting. is a copy of the slides that outlined the information that was discussed during the meeting.
The licensee discussed the scope of the project, the status and criteria for removal of information from the FSAR, the nature and number of unresolved items, and the schedule.
The staff noted that the licensee has made good progress and stated that new generic guidance was pending regarding FSAR update activities.
Following the FSAR discussion, the licensee briefly discussed a recently identiTied nonconforming condition related to the materials properties of emergency core cooling system strainers which are planned to be installed during the upcoming spring outage at the plant. The post fabrication hardness of the stainless steel material has been found to exceed that speciTied in Chapter 6 of the FSAR. The licensee indicated that it expects to send in an amendment addressing this issue.
ORIi'-INAL SIGNED BY:
Chester Poslusny, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate IV-2 Division of Reactor Projects III/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-397 Attachments:
- 1. List of Attendees
- 2. Slides cc w/encls: See next page DOCUMENT NAME:W2MEET.SUM DIS RIBUT 0 Docket Files PDIV-2 r/f OGC PUBLIC CPoslusny ACRS E-MAILS SCollins/FMiraglia (SJC1/FJM)
BBoger (RPZ)
EAdensam (EGA1)
WBateman (WHB)
EPeyton TMartin (SLM3)
PGwynn, Region IV BJohnson, RIV OFC PD4-PD4-2 NAME CPoslusny DATE 5 /4/ 98 EPSgtHP 5/W /98 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 9'805i90076 980506 PDR ADQCK 0500039'7 P
l 1i A
gp8 RE0ii
~ 0w
~o Cy A.
ClO Vl0
+~
~O
+~*<<<<
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Nay 6, 1998 LICENSEE:
Washington Public Power Supply System FACILITY:
WNP-2
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF MEETING WITHWASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM ON MARCH 30, 1998 On March 30, 1998, Washington Public Power Supply System and the NRC staff met to discuss the status and schedule for the licensee's program for upgrading the Nuclear Project No. 2 (WNP-2) Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). Enclosure 1 is a list of those who attended the meeting. is a copy of the slides that outlined the information that was discussed during the meeting.
The licensee discussed the scope of the project, the status and criteria for removal of information from the FSAR, the nature and number of unresolved items, and the schedule.
The staff noted that the licensee has made good progress and stated that new generic guidance was pending regarding FSAR update activities.
Following the FSAR discussion, the licensee briefly discussed a recently identified nonconforming condition related to the materials properties of emergency core cooling system strainers which are planned to be installed during the upcoming spring outage at the plant. The post fabrication hardness of the stainless steel material has been found to exceed that specified in Chapter 6 of the FSAR. The licensee indicated that it expects to send in an amendment addressing this issue.
Chester Poslusny, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate IV-2 Division of Reactor Projects III/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-397 Attachments:
- 1. List of Meeting Atendees
- 2. Slides ccw/encls:
See next page cc w/encls:
Mr. Greg O. Smith (Mail Drop 927M)
WNP-2 Plant General Manager Washington Public Power Supply System P. O. Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352-0968 Mr. Albert E. Mouncer (Mail Drop 1396)
Chief Counsel Washington Public Power Supply System P.O. Box'968 Richland, Washington 99352-0968 Ms. Deborah J. Ross, Chairman Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council P. O. Box 43172 Olympia, Washington 98504-3172 Mr. D. W. Coleman (Mail Drop PE20)
Acting Manager, Regulatory Affairs Washington Public Power Supply System P.O. Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352-0968 Mr. Paul Inserra (Mail Drop PE20)
Manager, Licensing Washington Public Power Supply System P.O. Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352 Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Harris Tower 8 Pavilion 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, Texas 76011-8064 Chairman Benton County Board of Commissioners P.O. Box 69 Prosser, Washington 99350-0190 Mr. Scott Boynton, Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 69 Richland, Washington 99352-0968 Mr. Perry D. Robinson, Esq.
Winston 8 Strawn 1400 L Street, N.W.
Mr. Rodney L. Webring (Mail Drop PE08)
Vice President, Operations Support/PIO Washington Public Power Supply System P. O. Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352 Mr. J. V. Parrish Chief Executive Officer Washington Public Power Supply System P.O. Box 968 (Mail Drop 1023)
Richland, Washington 99352-0968
EETIN S
G BL W
DE EC C
3 WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM D. Coleman D. Whitcomb NRC C. Poslusny E. McKenna F. Akstulewicz
4 I I'
Attachment 2
Washington Public Power Supply System Meeting with NRC Staff to Discuss WNP-2 FSAR Upgrade Program March 30, 1998 Agenda
~
Introduction and Background
~
Project Description
~
Recent Changes in Program Objectives
-Reduced Removal of Information
-Retained Historical Information
~
Unresolved Issues or Open Items
~
Status and Schedule
~
Conclusions
Introduction and Background Meeting Purpose-To status the NRC StafFon and to discuss important changes that have been made to the WNP-2 FSAR Upgrade Project
Background
~
Need for an Upgrade Project identified in 1995 Performance Enhancement Strategy
~
FSAR Upgrade Project Initiated in the Fall of 1996
~
Previous meetings held with the stafF on 4/3/97 and 8/27/97
project Description Scope, Objectives and Approach
- 1. Project Scope
~
Perform a complete review ofthe FSAR (all Chapters and Appendices)
~
Maintain current FSAR format and consistent level ofdetail
- 2. InitialProject Objectives
~
Ensure the FSAR is consistent and accurate
~
Improve text clarity
~
Add information consistent with 10CFR50.71(e)
~
Complete relocation of Questions Responses to associated chapter, as appropriate
~
Remove redundant information
~
Remove information that is not useful (e.g., historical and not time dependent)
~
Integrated computer data base with validation sources identified
- 3. Current Project Objectives
~
Same as above except for "Remove information that is not useful"
~
Initiated an approach to "ArcMveinformation in place"
~
Minimize removal ofinformation that is not useful
I
Project Description, continued
- 3. Project Approach
~
Commitment identification
~
FSARReviews
-Source validation is not a line by line validation, but addresses:
- a. principal safety features ofthe SSCs
- b. assumptions in the safety analysis that ensure compliance with regulatory requirements
- c. ensure that the plant design and operation are in conformance with the current plant design and operation
~
Open item identification and resolution
~
Computer Integration
- Willassociate validation source with FSAR feature in data base
Recent Changes in Program Objectives
- 1. Reduced Removal of Information
~
Revised Project Guidelines for removal ofinformation
- No longer part ofthe current licensing basis
- Redundant Information
~
Reviewed each delete identified in the tracking data base to determine acceptability
- 131 Deletes were identified in the data base
- 81 Acceptable Low risk systems Not specifically required by RG 1.70 Rev 2 Not specifically discussed in the SER Not in the FSAR because ofa commitment Several (-15) eliminated information.not consistent with CLB Several (-10) were relocation's not deletes
- 50 Unacceptable and returned to the FSAR High risk system Required by RG 1.70 Rev 2 Discussed in the SER
'Considered historical (-22) and designated for archival in Amendment 52
Recent Changes, continued
- 2. Retained Histor'ical Information
~
Archive within the FSAR
-Historical Information Used in the original plant site studies Not time dependent Examples are meteorological, seismic and original demographic information, Chapter 2
-Historical Design Basis Information Historical industry data used for system design Example is the isotopic distribution and quantities used in the Radwaste system design, Chapter 11
-Historical Programs programs used to support initial plant construction, design and preoperationaVstartup testing Examples are testing ofpre-purchased equipment, pre-service inspection plans and initial testing plans
~
Information designated as Historical has not been subjected to the validation process
Unresolved Issues or Open Items
- l. Open items are identified and tracked to closure
- 2. Open Item Classifications
~
Type 1: Discrepancy exists between source documents, one which supports the FSAR statement(s).
~
Type 2: No source document has been found to support the FSAR statement or values.
~
Type 3: Source document or Lead Technical Reviewers knowledge indicates the FSAR statement(s) or values are or may be incorrect.
- 3. Type 3 Open items are reviewed for immediate corrective action
~
Problem Evaluation Request (PER) is issued ifa condition adverse to quality exists:
-may have an immediate impact on personnel or nuclear safety
-may impact SSC operability
-may be reportable to an outside agency
-may involve an uncontrolled release ofradioactive material
-may threaten Plant Security
- 4. Open Item Breakdown as ofMarch 24, 1998
~
Type 1: 27
~
Type 2: 505
~
Type3:
52
- 5. Plan for Open Item Resolution
~
Transition to open item resolution as base program scope is completed
~
Completion by end of 1998 7
Status and Schedule
- 1. Status
~
Initial preparation (Enercon) ofUpgrade FSAR Sections 90% complete
~
. Internal Reviews 60% complete
~
Final and Approved about 15% complete
- 2. Schedule
~
Initial Scope completion scheduled for June 1
~
Currently about 4 weeks behind in some areas
~
Open Item closure willbegin April 1 and extend through December 1998
~
Amendment 53 scheduled for release the end ofOctober 1998
-willreflect the changes as result ofthe Upgrade Project
-willinclude changes implemented during spring refuel outage
-willinclude completed open item resolutions prior to release
I f
Conclusions
- 1. Project addresses commitment made to the NRC in 50.54(fw response
- 2. Project willmeet Supply System Objectives
~
Improve the accuracy ofthe FSAR
~
Improve consistency and clarity
~
Add information consistent with 10CFR50.71(e)
~
Remove redundant information
- 3. No significant health and safety issues have been identi6ed
~
Approximately 30 PERs have been dispositioned with resolution'associated with corrections being made during the FSAR Upgrade Project 9
Task Nane WNP-2 FSAR UPGRADE PROJECT SCHEDULE siar esr Nsr 5/97 r/sr Nsr 9/sr to/ar 11/ar tslar I/ss ass 3/as ess 5/ss 5/as r/ss Nss 0/ss to/ss 11/ss 12/ss 1/as 2/ss 3/sa esa
~
51
$7 1$
29 17 25 21 57 Chapter 18 Tech Specs Chapter 17 CA Chapler 10 Steam Chapter 14 InitialTests Chapter 12 Rad Prot<<ctlon Chapter 2 Stte Chapter 11 Rad Waste Chapter 1$ Operations Chapter 3 Structures Chapter 4 Reactor Chapter 8 Electrical Chapter 5 Coolant Chapter 7 ISC Chapter 0 Aux Systems Chapter 1 introduction Chapter 8 ESF Chapter 15 Acddents Append/ces Incorporate Ncw LDCNs N12 5/12 5/12 5/12 5/I2 NIS 7114 sns sn4 10/27
'2/I 12/4 1/20 2/18
$/18 3/$0 S/$0-4/8.
'4/1$
427-427 427 4nr~ N11 75 77 81 Verification Ltnklng Figures and Tables Submhtal Preparation Close Open Items I
I
-, 3/SO N11 5/18 10/$ 0 1201 ENERCON PROJECT WS102 Task Date: 3/25/95 C:ISOBiSCHEDULEVIEVS-2SSjaPP Progress Wee~
+
Rtptp Up Tptp SISISg~
Rtptp Up p pp p~ ~
Rpppupuas Page I
v
~
I