ML17292B252

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Insp Rept 50-397/96-22 on 971118 & Forwards Notice of Violation.Insp Identified Five Apparent Violations of NRC Requirements Related to Changes Made to Instrument response- Time Testing Program at Washington Nuclear Project-2
ML17292B252
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 02/20/1998
From: Merschoff E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Parrish J
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
Shared Package
ML17292B253 List:
References
EA-97-138, NUDOCS 9802260024
Download: ML17292B252 (7)


See also: IR 05000397/1996022

Text

CATEGORY

2

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

(RZDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9802260024

DOC.DATE: 98/02/20

NOTARIZED: NO

DOCKET

FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public

Powe

05000397

AUTH.NAME

AUTHOR AFFILIATION

MERSCHOFF,E.W.

Region

4

(Post

820201)

RECIP.NAME

RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

PARRZSH,J.V.

Washington Public Power Supply System

SUBJECT: Discusses

insp rept 50-397/96-22

on 971118

6 forwards notice

of violation.Insp identified five apparent violations of NRC

requirements

related to changes

made to instrument response-

time testing program at Washington Nuclear Project-2.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

IEOID

COPIES

RECEIVED:LTR J ENCL 2

SIZE:

TITLE: General

(50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response

NOTES:

RECIPIENT

XD CODE/NAME

PD4-2

PD

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

1

RECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

POSLUSNY,C

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

1

G

0

INTERNAL: ACRS

AEOD/TTC

ME

NRRP/DRPB~PCB

NUDOCS -ABSTRACT

OGC/HDS3

ERNAL: LITCO BRYCE,J H

NRC PDR

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

~

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

AEOD/SPD/RAB

DEDRO

NRR/DRCH/HHFB

NRR/DRPM/PERB

OE DIR

RGN4

FILE

01

NOAC

NUDOCS FULLTEXT

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

D

E

N

NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS

OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPZES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL

DESK

(DCD)

ON EXTENSION 415-2083

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES

REQUIRED:

LTTR

19

ENCL

19

~pR REOII

O+c

I

OO

Q

IIe

+w*e"

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

611 RYAN PLAZADRIVE. SUITE 400

ARLINGTON,TEXAS 76011 8064

February

20,

l998

EA 97-138

Mr. J. V. Parrish (Mail Drop 1023)

Chief Executive Officer

Washington Public Power Supply System

P.O. Box 968

Richland, Washington

99352-0968

SUBJECT:

NOTICE OF VIOLATIONAND EXERCISE OF ENFORCEMENT DISCRETION

(NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-397/96-22)

Dear Mr. Parrish:

This refers to your letter dated January 20, 1998, in response

to our letter and inspection report

dated December 3, 1997. The inspection was completed November 18, 1997! The NRC's

inspection identified five apparent violations of NRC requirements related to changes made to

the instrument response-time

testing program at Washington Nuclear Project-2 facility. The

NRC's letter indicated that the NRC was considering escalated enforcement action for these

apparent violations and requested that the Washington Public Power Supply System (Supply

System) respond to the apparent violations in writing, or request a predecisional enforcement

conference.

The Supply System opted to submit a written reply.

In your January 20 letter, you admitted all of the violations, emphasized that the violations did

not adversely impact safe plant operation or affect the ability of equipment to perform properly,

and acknowledged that the Supply System's implementation of industry guidance (NEDO- 32291) was not consistent with the NRC's expectations,

in that a license amendment was not

sought prior to the changes

being made to response-time

testing procedures.

You also noted

that the changes to response-time testing were ultimately found acceptable

to the NRC, as

indicated by the NRC's approval of Technical Specification Amendment 150 on June 11, 1997.

Based on the information developed during the inspection, and our consideration of the

information in your January 20, 1998 letter, the NRC has determined that violations of NRC

Your letter also described a number of corrective actions specific to the response-time

testing

issues, and stated that the Supply System is currently reviewing safety evaluations and

associated

changes made to the facility to determine ifinterpretation of generic guidance had

resulted in other instances of failure to identify the need to submit a license amendment request.

~el

1 997.

9802260024

'1180220

PDR

ADOCK 0500039'7

8

PDR

III/IIII/////////////////////((///////

'On March 20, 1997, the NRC informed the Supply System in writing that it was in

violation of WNP-2 Technical Specifications with respect to response-time

testing.

On

March 24, 1997, the NRC issued

a Notice of Enforcement Discretion, approving the Supply

System's request to continue power operations until the scheduled refueling outage in April

Washington Public Power Supply System

-2-

\\

requirements occurred.

A detailed description of the circumstances

resulting in the violations

was contained in the inspection report. These violations are cited in the enclosed Notice of .

Violation (Notice). The violations include: failures to conduct instrument response-time

testing in

accordance with Technical Specification requirements (Violations A, 8, and C); a failure to obtain

NRC approval prior to modifying response-time

testing procedures (Violation D); and failures to

implement changes

in response-time testing adequately and in accordance with NRC-approved

methodology (Violation E).

The NRC agrees with the Supply System's position regarding the safety consequences

of these

violations. The violations did not adversely affect the operability of the involved instrumentation

systems; thus, there was no actual adverse impact on plant safety.

The key violations involved

the failure to test the response time of various plant instrumentation systems in accordance with

existing requirements, and the failure to obtain approval from the NRC, as required by 10 CFR 50.59, before ceasing response-time testing required by technical specifications.

The failure to

conduct an adequate safety evaluation of these changes when they were being processed

within your 10 CFR 50.59 program appears to be the root cause of this entire problem.

The

significance of these violations rests in the processing failures that occurred, failures which, if

applied to other modifications or changes to plant systems and procedures,

could adversely

affect plant safety.

In addition, the NRC considers significant any failure to properly implement

10 CFR 50.59 in which a licensee has effectively modified NRC-approved Technical

Specifications without prior approval, a violation which undermines the checks and balances

inherent'in the regulatory process.

Therefore, these violations are classified in the aggregate at Severity Level III in accordance

with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions"

(Enforcement Policy), NUREG-1600.

In accordance with the Enforcement Policy, normally a civil penalty with a base value of $55,000

is considered for a Severity Level III problem. And given prior escalated enforcement action

against the Supply System, and the NRC's identification of these violations, a civil penalty would

have resulted had we followed the normal civil penalty assessment

process described in VI.B.2

of the Enforcement Policy. However, in consideration of the circumstances of this case, and

after consultation with the Director, Office of Enforcement,

I have been authorized not to assess

a civil penalty, in accordance with VII.B.6 of the Enforcement Policy. Specifically, the NRC has

taken into consideration the apparent misinterpretation of NEDO-32291 guidance, which the

~

NRC had app'roved generically and which appears to have resulted in three other boiling water

reactor licensees making the same series of mistakes; the fact that all of the instruments in

question were tested and would have performed their intended functions; and the fact that the

response time verification portion of the calibration methodologies employed by the Supply

System were ultimately accepted by the NRC.

Although the NRC is generally satisfied with your corrective actions, as documented

in the

Supply System's letter dated January 20, 1998, we request that you supplement your January

20 letter with the date at which you plan to complete your review of safety evaluations and

associated

activities to determine if interpretation of generic guidance has resulted in other

instances of similar failures (reference page 3 of the January 20 letter). Aside from the

Washington Public Power Supply System

-3-

requested date, the NRC has concluded that information regarding the reason for the violations,

the corrective actions taken and planned to correct the violations and prevent recurrence, and

the date when full compliance was achieved is already adequately addressed

on the docket in

the Supply System's letter dated January 20, and the subject inspection report. Therefore, with

the exception above, no further response

is required unless the description therein does not

accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position.

In that case, or ifyou choose to

provide additional information, you should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed

Notice.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its

enclosure, and any response you choose to submit will be placed in the NRC Public Document

Room (PDR).

Sincer

ly,

Ellis W. Mersch

Regional Adm'strator

Docket No.:

50-397

License No.:

NPF-21

Enclosure:

Notice of Violation

cc (w/encl):

Chairman

Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council

P.O. Box 43172

Olympia, Washington

98504-3172

Mr. Rodney L. Webring (Mail Drop PE08)

Vice President, Operations Support/PIO

Washington Public Power Supply System

P.O. Box 968

Richland, Washington

99352-0968

Mr. Greg O. Smith (Mail Drop 927M)

WNP-2 Plant General Manager

Washington Public Power Supply System

P.O. Box 968

Richland, Washington

99352-0968

Mr. David A. Swank (Mail Drop PE20)

Manager, Regulatory Affairs

Washington Public Power Supply System

P.O. Box 968

Washington Public Power Supply System

-4-

Richland, Washington

99352-0968

Mr. Albert E. Mouncer (Mail Drop 396)

Chief Counsel

Washington Public Power Supply System

P.O. Box 968

Richland, Washington

99352-0968

Mr. Paul Inserra (Mail Drop PE20)

Manager, Licensing

Washington Public Power Supply System

P.O. Box 968

Richland, Washington

99352-0968

Perry D. Robinson, Esq.

Winston 8 Strawn

1400 L Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20005-3502

Washington Public Power Supply System

- EA 97-138

bcc w/Enclosure:

PDR

LPDR

SECY

CA

EDO (0-17G21)

DEDO (0-17G21)

OE:EAFile (0-7H5)

CHANDLER, OGC (0-15B18)

COLLINS, NRR (0-12G18)

POLUSNY, NRR

OC/LFDCB (T-9E10)

RA Reading File

WISE

MIS Coordinator

RSLO

WONG, DRP

E-MAILDISTRIBUTI N:

OEMAIL

TPGwynn (TPG)

GSanborn (GFS)

BHenderson (BWH)

DKunihiro (DMK1)

Art Howell (ATH)

KPerkins (KEP)

KBrockman (KEB)

PE

NUDOCS

EC's:

Rl, Rll, Rill

PA (0-2G4)

OIG (T-5D28)

LIEBERMAN,OE (0-7H5)

OI (0-3E4)

GOLDBERG, OGC (0-15B18)

BOGER, NRR/ADP (0-12G18)

OC/DAF (T-9E10)

AEOD (T-4D18)

GSanborn-EAFile

RIV Files

PAO

WILLIAMSON,Ol

JDyer (JED2)

WBrown (WLB)

GMVasquez (GMV)

CHackney (CAH)

DChamberlain (DDC)

HWong (HJW)

BOYNTON (SXB1)

DOCUMENT NAME: G:>EAiCASES>WNPRTAEA97138.DFT

To receive copy of document, indicate in box: "C" = Copy without enclosures

"E" = Copy with enclosures "N" = No copy

EO

SANBORN"

2/7/98

D:OE Itu +(4 s

LIEBERMAN

Z ir

C:DRP/E

WONG"

NRR P~r

BO

ER

D:WCFO

PERKINS"

DRA

DYER

2 I'6 06

D:DRP

GWYNN"

Off

RC

WmBROWN"

Denotes previous concurrence

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Washington Public Power Supply System

- EA 97-138

bcc w/Enclosure:

PDR

LPDR

SECY

CA

EDO (0-17G21)

DEDO (0-17G21)

OE:EAFile (0-7H5)

CHANDLER, OGC (0-15B18)

COLLINS, NRR (0-12G18)

POLUSNY, NRR

OC/LFDCB (T-9E10)

RA Reading File

WISE

MIS Coordinator

RSLO

WONG, DRP

E-MAILDISTRIBUTION:

OE MAIL

TPGwynn (TPG)

GSanborn (GFS)

BHenderson (BWH)

DKunihiro (DMK1)

Art Howell (ATH)

KPerkins (KEP)

KBrockman (KEB)

IE 14

NUDOCS

EC's:

Rl, Rll, Rill

PA (0-2G4)

OIG (T-5D28)

LIEBERMAN,OE (0-7H5)

01 (0-3E4)

GOLDBERG, OGC (0-15B18)

BOGER, NRR/ADP (0-12G18)

OC/DAF (T-9E10)

AEOD (T-4D18)

GSanborn-EAFile

RIV Files

PAO

WILLIAMSON,OI

JDyer (JED2)

WBrown (WLB)

GMVasquez (GMV)

CHackney (CAH)

DChamberlain (DDC)

HWong (HJW)

BOYNTON ( g ~ ))

DOCUMENT NAME: G:>EAttCASESttWNPRTDEA97138.DFT

To receive copy of d

ument, indicate in box: "C" =

opy without enclosures

"E" = Copy with enciosures "N"= No copy

EO

SANB

N)

2/7/98

D:OE

LIEBERMAN~

C:DRP/E

WONG

DRA

DYER

D:WCFO

PERKINS

RA

MERSCHOFF

DRP

GW

N

RC

WmBR

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY