ML17279A224

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Wppss Nuclear Plant 2 Annual Environ Operating Rept 1986. W/870423 Ltr
ML17279A224
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 12/31/1986
From: Sorensen G
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
GO2-87-146, NUDOCS 8704280574
Download: ML17279A224 (56)


Text

REGULAINFQRNATIDN DISTRIBUTI TEN (RIDE)

ACCES II'ION NBR: 8704280574 r'AC'IL: 50-397 WPPSS DOC. DATE: ~~1 NOTARIZED: NO Nuclear Progecti UIIit Zi Washington Pub li c Pose DOCKET 050003'P7

¹ AUTH. NANE AUTHOR AFFILIATION SORENSENA 1'. C Washington Public Pouer Supplg System RECIP. NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

SUBJECT:

"WPPSS Nuclear Plant 2 Annual Environ Operating Rept 1 rB6."

423 tr.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE25D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR ENCL SI ZE:

TITLE: Environmental Monitoring Rept (per Tech Specs)

NOTES:

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COP IES ID CODE/NANE LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD5 LA 1 0 PD5 PD 5 5 SANWORTH> R 1 1 INTERNAL: ACRS 1 1 AEOD/DQA AEOD/DSP/TPAB 1 1 ARN TECH ADV 1 1 LPDR NRR/DREP/RPB RES SPEIS, T 1

1 1

1 NR 0 FII C%v

~

E~DE FILE OZ 01 1

1 1

1 1

R CN2/DR SS/EP R P 8 1 1 EXTERNAL: NRC PDR TOTAL NUNBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LT1R 22 ENCL 21

'1

rW SUPPLY SYSTEM NUCLEAR PLANT NO. 2 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 1986 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS DEPARTMENT WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM APRIL 1987 8704280574 8hi231 050003'P7 PDR ADOCK R PDR

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Introduction........... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 Unreviewed Environmental guestions.... 1 Cooling Tower Drift Studies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ 1 Nonroutine Reports . . ~ ~

NPDES Permit-Related Reports . ~ ~

IHTRODUCT ION The WNP-2 Environmental Protection Plan (Appendix 8 to Operating License Ho.

NPF-21) addresses the protection of nonradiological environmental values dur-ing plant operation. Section 3.0 of the EPP requires that changes in plant design and operation be assessed for environmental impacts against the impacts which were projected by the NRC at the time the plant was licensed. Changes which involve an unreviewed environmental question (defined in the EPP) must be approved by the HRC. Section 4.0 requires the reporting of events which may result in significant environmental impacts and also requires a soil and vegetation monitoring program to evaluate cooling tower drift impacts.

Section 5.0 addr esses administrative matters and requires an annual report on several EPP conditions including the monitoring program. This Annual Environ-mental Operating Report is submitted per Section 5.4.1 of the EPP.

UNREVIEWED ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONS A proposed change, test, or experiment is deemed to involve an unreviewed environmental question, if it concerns: (1) a matter which may result in sig-nificant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the environmental licensing documentation; or (2) a significant change in effluents or power level; or (3) a matter not previously evaluated in the environmental documentation which may have a significant adverse environmental impact (EPP Section 3.1). Ho changes in WNP-2 design or operation, or tests or experiments in 1986 involved an unreviewed environmontal question.

COOLING TOWER DRIFT STUDIES Section 4,2.1 of the EPP requires a monitoring program to assess the effects of cooling tower drift. As in previous years, soil and vegetation samples were collected in Hay at four grassland (G01-G04) and five shrub (S01-S05) sites (see Figure 1) and analyzed for relevant chemistry parameters. Analyt-ical methods were described in the Environmental Operating Report for 1985.

The results for 1986 and comparisons with previous years are sumnarized below.

Soil Chemistry Results The results of the 1986 soil chemical analyses are presented in Table 1 and are shown graphically in Figures 2 through 18.

Soils at all sample sites range from sandy to sandy loam and contain a low percentage of clay. Soil pH values were well within the range of measurements in previous years. Other than a three-year decline at site G03, no trends were apparent (Figure 2). Soil conductivity ranged from 13.6 microsiemens/cm at site S05 to 50.8 at G04. The large increases noted in 1985 at sites GOl, G02, and C43 were not evident in 1986 (Figure 3).

-1

Soil sulfate concentrations at all sites were low (Figure 4). Calcium (Figure 5) and magnesium (Figure 6) values were near the means for previous

~

ears. Site G02 experienced a marked increase in calcium concentration

~

~

etween 1985 (0.27%) and 1986 (0.57%). Sodium (Figure 7) and potassium

~

~

(Figure 8) measurements were generally lower than in previous years. Soil bicarbonate at all sites was within the range of previous measurements. Fluo-ride and chloride (Figures 10 and 11) were also within the range of concentra-tions previously recorded.

Soil copper was measured at levels generally exceeding previous measurements (Figure 12). However, at site G03, which is closest to the cooling towers, the concentration (10.6 ug/g) was near the median for previous years. Lead and cadmium concentrations (Figures 13 and 14) were at the lower end of the historical data. Chromium measurements were near the means of previously recorded data (Figure 15). Nickel concentrations showed increases over the past three years at sites G01, G02, G04, and S01 (Figure 16). Several values were the highest recorded since the study began in 1980. Soil mercury and zinc were within the ranges previously recorded.

Ve etation Chemistry Results The results of the 1986 vegetation chemical analyses are presented in Table 2.

tectorum are shown in Figures 19 through 24.

Copper concentrations were similar to measurements for previous years with some exceptions. The copper in Sisymbrium al tissimum at site G04'as approxi-tions in Poa sandbergii were markedly elevated at sites G02, G04, S02, and S05. Bromus tectorum exhibited a large increase in copper at site G03. With very ew excep ~ons, concentrations of chloride and sulfate in all species were near the means recorded for previous years. Poa sandbergii at site G02 h i f b hi Soil and Ve etation Stud Summary Although some stations show departure from means of historical data for some chemical constituents, no trends or adverse impacts are apparent. The cooling tower drift study may be modified in 1987 to allow for better evaluation of spatial relationships and time trends.

NONROUTINE REPORTS During 1986 there were no nonroutine reports required by Section 5 .4.2 of the EPP nor were there any EPP noncompliances.

NPDES PERMIT-RELATED REPORTS monthly discharge monitoring reports are submitted to the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC). A summary of the reported data is shown in Table

3. They were no instances of noncompliance in 1986.

IO OO Table 1 SOIL CHEMISTRY AT NINE SEA>LE LOCATIONS, HAY 1986 G01 G03 GOI SO I S02 S03 SOI pH (I:2 soil-water} 7. 17 7.18 6 .97 7.01 & 8 1 7.94 7.29 7.22 7.02 Cm4ctiv ity (1:2 soil-water) 378 28.1 258 50.8 21.0 -" 26.1 13.7 24.2 13.6 mi eros iemens/cm Sul fate ug/g 4.88 3.04 5.44 7 .96 2.84 2.80 2.16 2.84 0.88 Chloride ug/g 4.80 4.48 5.92 4.56 4.56 5.76 4. 5.92 4.56 Copper ug/g 14. 29 16.90 10.62 13.87 14.45 14.34 12.86 17.06 10.72 Lead ug/g 4.54 1.66 1.37 2.39 1.81 1.77 1.70 1.99 1.83 Cadnium u g/g 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.04 Chromium ug/g 13.10 11.01 8.01 7.32 9.52 10.22 8.72 10.69 7.65 Nickel ug/g 23.43 15 .16 12. 41 2 1.53 16.76 19.08 10.88 ll 80 11.10 2inc ug/g 54.01 51.19 '3.95 51.60 50.47 37.52 56.35 56 81 56.22 Sodium X 0.0 18 0.020 0.0 13 0.0 13 0.0 17 0.008 0.0 18 ~ 0.017 0.0 17 Potass ium X 0.187 0.143 0.096 0.0% 0.099 0.052 0.095 0.122 0.092 Calcium X 0.32 0.57 0. 34 0.34 0.35 0.44 0.37 0. 36 0. 34 Hercury ug/g 0.007 0.005 0.002 0.003 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.005 0.004 I

FIuor ide ug/g 207 189 201 174 167 186 Bicarbora te (meq/HC03/g) 0.0021 0.0025 0.0015 0.00 14 0.0007 0.0024 0.00 10 0.0006 0.0006 Ha@esium X 0.49 0.50 0.41 0. 38 0.45 0. 35 0.42 0.43 0.40

~0 TABLE 2 VEGETATION CHEMISTRY AT NINE SAMPLE LOCATIONS, MAY 1986 SITE POSA" BRTE* SIAL* PHLO* PUTR* ARTR*

Copper (ug/g) G01 2.49 4. 07 5.23 4.92 G02 8.25 4.68 4.10 4.50 G03 4.90 14.62 7.89 8. 52 G04 7.79 10.12 15.98 6. 38 S01 3.38 6.75 3.08 8.28 S02 9.12 4.50 3.06 4.74 S03 4.02 5.53 12.04 6.80 S04 5.07 6.18 6.32 7.44 S05 5.40 6. 30 4.00 6.38 Extractable Gol . 0.000 0.068 0.596 0.000 Sulfate (%) G02 0.170 0.294 0.793 0.000 G03 0.000 0.026 0.822 0.000 G04 0.000 0.078 0.524 0.000 Sol 0.000 0.019 0.564 0.096 S02 0.037 0.176 0.018 0.000 S03 0.026 0.094 0.026 0.000 S04 0.000 0.000 0.671 0.036 S05 0.000 0.079 0.000 0.050 Extractable GC1 0.13 0.28 0.75 0.16 Chloride (") G02 0.47 0.16 0.49 0.14 G03 0.33 0.15 0.45 0.17 G04 0.15 0.15 0. 51 0.14 Sol 0.13 0.10 0.31 0.19 S02 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.19 S03 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.85 S04 0.14 0. 40 0.53 0.11 S05 0.19 0.15 0,09 0.85

  • POSA = Poa ~Sandbar

= 3romus tectorum ii BRTE SIAL = Yss iir~>um a t>ssimum PHLO = h ox on i7opsa PUTR = FursSsia tr> entata ARTR = 7Crremisiaaanen ata

~0 ~0 Table 3

SUMMARY

Of DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS, 1986 Low Volume Waste Cooling Tower Blowdown TSS (lbs/d) 0/G (lbs/d) Vol (103 gal/d) TRC (mg/1) Vol (10 gal/d)

Month Ave Max Ave Hax A;e Max Hax Ave Max Jan 0.5 1.5 0.3 3.1 10.9 23.4 c 0.1 2.7 7.1 Feb 1.4 17.4 O.l 0.3 11 .9 25.3 c 0.1 1.8 4.1 Mar 1.2 5.3 O.l 0.7 11.0 16.5 c P.l 1.4 2.3 Apr 0.9 3.9 0.1 0.8 14.0 29.5 <0.1 3.3 6.1 May 4.5 25.1 0.3 1.9 14;5 28.9 0.0 0.0 1.4 4.9 0.1 0.6 14.1 20.3 2.6 5.6 5.3 0.1 0.9 10.7 15.0 i 0.1 2.7 4.9 Aug 3.6 15.4 0.4 1.8 12. 2 20.0 2.2 3.5 Sep 1.9 12.6 0.1 0.2 9.5 15.9 1.8 3.8 Oct 1.2 6.6 0.1 0.2 11.6 17.7 < 0.1 1.6 4.7 Nov 2.1 20.2 0.2 0.8 10.9 17.6 c O.l 1.2 4.3 Dec 1.5 18.9 0. 2 2.4 14.5 31. 2 < 0.1 0.8 1.7 Permi t I Limt 2.5 20 40 0.1 4.6 9.4

~0 Pt

311) 311 311 312

>>I ~

p0 >>>>l l a>>>> M ~ eal ~

eeeee Co ~ j E) gs>>>> csee

~ 0 WS

~ ~ ee ASM>>fl4e

~4+0 g) I SIIIIOK>>to p, ~ CKAO

~0 mls>>e Is>>le K>> P1 oj, '

~

'S r ~

4 e a a a 4 a as 4)taa ~ oa ~ d 0 )

m 0, 'I rl >>TIKI 0 to 0 F ~

'I

~

a OIIIce elLA 44 aa

',," 0

(.'. Pj

) I ee II 4 m 310 1

"C) 4 312 m

3L?

$ 0) +.+ AKO ao

~~

otl ~ 91 4~

3LC

~ee J ~

C) .C'4 a kc >>AL r0>>>>)

~

ll>>C ~

4)

IO) 9 rc ~

WII.

+ C..

~ ICA>> AK>>I

))I IM

~ ~t tt MII h

~ <<>>

~ 0 tl 40~ a >>4 eaa

~

00 ( I l ~ ll ~ + 'Cle I ~

//

tl ~

S 04

'I frr r asia 404IO e ae I I

n C3 / j t>>l(

0 Q.foot e It ~ e CIO a e Oa tD I jo CC>>ll >>

4 I/) I asses aaaaae c CIH Its latesees 4C ~ 'I I>>

~ >>K I I>> ~ AC>>>>0 a eaa 4

) t>>I ~a CO t>>IC0 00.

at>>OIIO IO 00

~ tt>>alt>>c

~ s>>et>>II>>oc Sotlt Cttse

>> cc ~ ~ ~

Q OIO IA a>>>>ttl>> OO ~ I ea a>>ac

'I 449aaaa 0 Wlcc>> ~

Ce>>l 9) EMERGENCY

'S) PLAN ZONE MAP 0

0 A 10 ))IIIIIADIU) easer ~

1 M ~ IV

) A I SIIPPI Y SYSTEM 3C2 3L3 3 34l. I

~ ~ ~ cl>>>>r Mt 821)21

Q.O LEGEND 1980 e.e 1981 1982 5.0 1983 1984 1 985 1986 7.0 5.5 5.0 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 2. SOIL pll, 1980-1986

~0 100 LEGEND 90 1980 1981 80 1983 70 1984 60 1985 5 50 1986 N

5 40 30 20 10 0

G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FiGURE 3. SOIL CONDUCTIVITY, 1980, 1981, and 1983-1986

~~

200 LEGEND 180 1 980 180 1981 1982 140 1 983 120 1985 I 100 1986 80 80 40 20 0

G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SOS SITE FIGURE 4. SOIL SULFATE, 1980-1986

~~

lk

~\

.eo LEGEND

.72 1 980 1981

.e4 1982

.se 1983 Ad 1984 gC3 5 1985 AO 1986 I.m

.24

~ 1e

.oe G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02- S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 5. SOIL CALCIUM (lJt I), 1980-1986

I~ ~~

LEGEND 1981 1 982 1 983 1984 1 985.

1986 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SOS SITE FIGURE 6. SOIL MAGNESIUM (lit I), 1980-1986

.20 LEGEND

.1d 1980 1981 o1$

1982 1983

.12 1984 g

h .10 1985 I .Od 1986

.Od

.04

.02 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SiTE FIGURE 7. SOIL SODIUt1 (Wt X), 1980-1986

.50 A5 1980 1981 AO 1982

.35 1983 1984 1985 1986

.15

.10

.05 0

G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 8. SOIL POTASSIUM (lit ~~), 1980-1986

4 LEGEND 1980 1981 30 1 982 1983 1984 C9

~

oa20 O

I

~ 1985 X

Cf 1986 1d 10 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 9. SOIL BICARBONATE, 1980-1986

l N

400 LEGEND 1980 350 1981 300 1 982 1 983 I 200 1984 I

C9 ED 200 1 985 1986 CD

~ 150 100 50 0

G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 10. SOIL FLUORIDF., 1980-1986

20 LEGEND 16 1 980 1981 16 1982 1 983 I 12 S

1984 1 985 10 g

CO C)

CC 1986 6

0 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 11. SOIL Cl(LORIOE, 1980-1986

l 1 d.o LEGEND 1 e.d 1 980 1981 15.e 1982 1hA 1 983 13.2 1984 1 2.0 1 985 1986 5 10od s.e dA 7.2 e.o G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SOS SITE FIGURE 12. SOIL COPPER, 1980-1986

LEGEND 1980 1 981 1 982 1 983 1984 1 985 1986 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 13. SOIL LEAD, 1980-1986

.80 LEGEND 1

.72 1980 1981 1982 1'983 Ad O 984 1985

.hO g

CO C7 1986 5..32

.24

+1S

.08 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 14. SOIL CAD1)IUH, 1900-1906

~ a~

I C y

25.0 LEGEND 22,5 1 980 1 981 20.0 1 982 17.5 1983 15.0 1984-1985 12.5 1986 5.0 0

G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 15. SOIL CHROMIUI1, 1980-1986

~ NO t ~ ~ 'I

30.0 LEGEND 27.8 1980 1981 25.2 1982 22.8 1 983 I 20.h 1984 1985 1 8.0 1986 15.8 13.2 10.8 8A 8.0 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 16. SOIL NICKEL, 1980-1986

.0100 LEGEND

.0091 1 983

.0082 1 984 1 985

.0073 1986

.0084

.0055 C9 CD o004d

.0037

.0028

.0019

.0010 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 17. SOIL IIERCURY, 1983-1986

yO 90 LEGEND 1 980 60 1981 1982 VO 1 983 I 80 1984 1 985 8

ce 50 1986 40 30 20 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SOS SITE FIGURE 18. SOIL ZINC, 1980-1986

~0 ~0 I

10 LEGEND 1 980 1981 1982 1 983 B 1984 I

C9 CD B

1 985 1986 D

K G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 19. COPPER IN POA SANDDERGI I, 1980-1986

~0

/ )

20 LEGEND 1d 1980 1981 1982 1983 g 12 1984 1985 10 g

1986 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 20. COPPER IN BROHUS TECTORUI1, 1980-1986

~0 C ~ Jf

.250 LEGEND

.225 1 980 1981

.200 1982

.1 75

à 1 983

.150 1984 o125 1 985 1986

.100

.075

.050

.025 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 21. SULFATE It< POA SAHDBERGII, 1980-1986

.50 LEGEND 1 980 1 981 AO 1 982

.35 1 983 Q .30 1984

.25 1 985 1986

.15

.10 o05 0

G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SOS SITE FIGURE 22. SULFATE IN BROIIUS TECTORUM, 1980-1986

0 I

li

(e

.50 LEGEND Ad 1980 1981 AO 1982

.35 1983 M

9 CK

.30 1984 C)

.25 1985 1986

.15

.10

.05 0

G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 23. CHLORIDE IN POA SANDBERGII, 1980-1986

~0

.80 LEGEND 1 980 1981 1982

.42 1 983 M

K .as 1984 C)

~ 1985

.~o 1986

.12

.os G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 24. CHLORIDE IH BROHUS TECTORUll, 1930-1936

0 f

ti WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O. Box 968 ~ 3000 George Washington Way ~ Richland, Washington 99352 Docket No. 50-397 April 23, 1987 G02-87-146 Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

Dear Sirs:

Subject:

NUCLEAR PLANT NO. 2 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT

Reference:

Facility Operating License NPF-21 Appendix B - Environmental Protection Plan Per Section 5.4.1 of the referenced EPP, please find attached the subject report for the 1986 calendar year.

Very truly yo rs, G. C. rensen Manager, Regulatory Programs

Attachment:

As stated cc: JB flartin/NRC RV R Dodds/Resident Inspector/901A WL Fitch/EFSEC

<<0

,l

.Ii tk