GO2-87-146, WPPSS Nuclear Plant 2 Annual Environ Operating Rept 1986

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WPPSS Nuclear Plant 2 Annual Environ Operating Rept 1986
ML17279A224
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 12/31/1986
From: Sorensen G
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
GO2-87-146, NUDOCS 8704280574
Download: ML17279A224 (56)


Text

REGULAINFQRNATIDN DISTRIBUTI TEN (RIDE)

ACCES II'ION NBR: 8704280574 DOC. DATE: ~~1 NOTARIZED:

NO DOCKET ¹ r'AC'IL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Progecti UIIit Zi Washington Pub lic Pose 050003'P7 AUTH. NANE AUTHOR AFFILIATION SORENSENA 1'. C Washington Public Pouer Supplg System RECIP. NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

SUBJECT:

"WPPSS Nuclear Plant 2 Annual Environ Operating Rept 1 rB6."

423 tr.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

IE25D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR ENCL SI ZE:

TITLE: Environmental Monitoring Rept (per Tech Specs)

NOTES:

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NANE PD5 LA SANWORTH> R INTERNAL: ACRS AEOD/DSP/TPAB LPDR NRR/DREP/RPB RES SPEIS, T RCN2/DRSS/EP R P 8 EXTERNAL:

NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

0 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD5 PD AEOD/DQA ARN TECH ADV NR E~DE 0 FII~

OZ C%v FILE 01 COP IES LTTR ENCL 5

5 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

TOTAL NUNBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LT1R 22 ENCL 21

'1

rW

SUPPLY SYSTEM NUCLEAR PLANT NO.

2 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 1986 ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS DEPARTMENT WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM APRIL 1987 8704280574 8hi231 PDR ADOCK 050003'P7 R

PDR

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Introduction...........

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

Unreviewed Environmental guestions....

Cooling Tower Drift Studies.

Nonroutine Reports NPDES Permit-Related Reports 1

1

~

~

1

~

~

~

~

IHTRODUCTION The WNP-2 Environmental Protection Plan (Appendix 8 to Operating License Ho.

NPF-21) addresses the protection of nonradiological environmental values dur-ing plant operation.

Section 3.0 of the EPP requires that changes in plant design and operation be assessed for environmental impacts against the impacts which were projected by the NRC at the time the plant was licensed.

Changes which involve an unreviewed environmental question (defined in the EPP) must be approved by the HRC.

Section 4.0 requires the reporting of events which may result in significant environmental impacts and also requires a soil and vegetation monitoring program to evaluate cooling tower drift impacts.

Section 5.0 addr esses administrative matters and requires an annual report on several EPP conditions including the monitoring program.

This Annual Environ-mental Operating Report is submitted per Section 5.4.1 of the EPP.

UNREVIEWED ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONS A proposed

change, test, or experiment is deemed to involve an unreviewed environmental question, if it concerns:

(1) a matter which may result in sig-nificant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the environmental licensing documentation; or (2) a significant change in effluents or power level; or (3) a matter not previously evaluated in the environmental documentation which may have a significant adverse environmental impact (EPP Section 3.1).

Ho changes in WNP-2 design or operation, or tests or experiments in 1986 involved an unreviewed environmontal question.

COOLING TOWER DRIFT STUDIES Section 4,2.1 of the EPP requires a monitoring program to assess the effects of cooling tower drift.

As in previous years, soil and vegetation samples were collected in Hay at four grassland (G01-G04) and five shrub (S01-S05) sites (see Figure 1) and analyzed for relevant chemistry parameters.

Analyt-ical methods were described in the Environmental Operating Report for 1985.

The results for 1986 and comparisons with previous years are sumnarized below.

Soil Chemistry Results The results of the 1986 soil chemical analyses are presented in Table 1 and are shown graphically in Figures 2 through 18.

Soils at all sample sites range from sandy to sandy loam and contain a low percentage of clay.

Soil pH values were well within the range of measurements in previous years.

Other than a three-year decline at site

G03, no trends were apparent (Figure 2).

Soil conductivity ranged from 13.6 microsiemens/cm at site S05 to 50.8 at G04.

The large increases noted in 1985 at sites

GOl, G02, and C43 were not evident in 1986 (Figure 3).

-1

Soil sulfate concentrations at all sites were low (Figure 4).

Calcium (Figure 5) and magnesium (Figure 6) values were near the means for previous

~

~

~

~

~

ears.

Site G02 experienced a marked increase in calcium concentration etween 1985 (0.27%) and 1986 (0.57%).

Sodium (Figure 7) and potassium (Figure 8) measurements were generally lower than in previous years.

Soil bicarbonate at all sites was within the range of previous measurements.

Fluo-ride and chloride (Figures 10 and 11) were also within the range of concentra-tions previously recorded.

Soil copper was measured at levels generally exceeding previous measurements (Figure 12).

However, at site G03, which is closest to the cooling towers, the concentration (10.6 ug/g) was near the median for previous years.

Lead and cadmium concentrations (Figures 13 and 14) were at the lower end of the historical data.

Chromium measurements were near the means of previously recorded data (Figure 15).

Nickel concentrations showed increases over the past three years at sites

G01, G02, G04, and S01 (Figure 16).

Several values were the highest recorded since the study began in 1980.

Soil mercury and zinc were within the ranges previously recorded.

Ve etation Chemistry Results The results of the 1986 vegetation chemical analyses are presented in Table 2.

tectorum are shown in Figures 19 through 24.

Copper concentrations were similar to measurements for previous years with some exceptions.

The copper in Sisymbrium al tissimum at site G04'as approxi-tions in Poa sandbergii were markedly elevated at sites

G02, G04,
S02, and S05.

Bromus tectorum exhibited a large increase in copper at site G03.

With very ew excep

~ons, concentrations of chloride and sulfate in all species were near the means recorded for previous years.

Poa sandbergii at site G02 h

i f

b hi Soil and Ve etation Stud Summary Although some stations show departure from means of historical data for some chemical constituents, no trends or adverse impacts are apparent.

The cooling tower drift study may be modified in 1987 to allow for better evaluation of spatial relationships and time trends.

NONROUTINE REPORTS During 1986 there were no nonroutine reports required by Section 5.4.2 of the EPP nor were there any EPP noncompliances.

NPDES PERMIT-RELATED REPORTS monthly discharge monitoring reports are submitted to the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC).

A summary of the reported data is shown in Table 3.

They were no instances of noncompliance in 1986.

IO OO

Table 1

SOIL CHEMISTRY AT NINE SEA>LE LOCATIONS, HAY 1986 G01 G03 GOI SO I S02 S03 SOI pH (I:2 soil-water}

7. 17 Cm4ctiv ity (1:2 soil-water) 378 mi eros iemens/cm 7.18 28.1 6.97 7.01 258 50.8

&8 1 7.94 21.0 26.1 7.29 13.7 7.22 24.2 7.02 13.6 Sul fate ug/g Chloride ug/g Copper ug/g Lead ug/g Cadnium u g/g Chromium ug/g Nickel ug/g 2inc ug/g Sodium X Potass ium X Calcium X Hercury ug/g FIuor ide ug/g Bicarbora te (meq/HC03/g)

Ha@esium X

4.88 4.80

14. 29 4.54 0.05 13.10 3.04 4.48 16.90 1.66 0.07 11.01 5.44 5.92 10.62 1.37 0.04 8.01 7.96 4.56 13.87 2.39 0.06 7.32 23.43 15.16
12. 41 2 1.53 54.01 51.19

'3.95 51.60 0.0 18 0.187 0.32 0.007 I

207 0.020 0.143 0.57 0.005 189 0.0 13 0.096

0. 34 0.002 0.0 13 0.0%

0.34 0.003 0.49 0.50 0.41

0. 38 0.0021 0.0025 0.0015 0.00 14 2.84 4.56 14.45 1.81 0.06 9.52 16.76 50.47 0.0 17 0.099 0.35 0.006 201 0.0007 0.45 2.80 5.76 14.34 1.77 0.03 10.22 19.08 37.52 0.008 0.052 0.44 0.004 174 0.0024
0. 35 2.16 4.

12.86 1.70 0.05 8.72 10.88 56.35 0.0 18 0.095 0.37 0.003 167 2.84 5.92 17.06 1.99 0.05 10.69 ll80 56 81

~ 0.017 0.122

0. 36 0.005 186 0.88 4.56 10.72 1.83 0.04 7.65 11.10 56.22 0.0 17 0.092
0. 34 0.004 0.42 0.43 0.40 0.00 10 0.0006 0.0006

~ 0

TABLE 2 VEGETATION CHEMISTRY AT NINE SAMPLE LOCATIONS, MAY 1986 SITE POSA" BRTE*

SIAL*

PHLO*

PUTR*

ARTR*

Copper (ug/g)

G01 2.49 G02 8.25 G03 4.90 G04 7.79 S01 3.38 S02 9.12 S03 4.02 S04 5.07 S05 5.40

4. 07 4.68 14.62 10.12 6.75 4.50 5.53 6.18
6. 30 5.23 4.10 7.89 15.98 3.08 6.32 4.92 4.50
6. 38 8.28 3.06 12.04 7.44
8. 52 4.74 6.80 4.00 6.38 Extractable Sulfate

(%)

Gol

. 0.000 G02 0.170 G03 0.000 G04 0.000 Sol 0.000 S02 0.037 S03 0.026 S04 0.000 S05 0.000 0.068 0.294 0.026 0.078 0.019 0.176 0.094 0.000 0.079 0.596 0.793 0.822 0.524 0.564 0.671 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.096 0.018 0.026 0.036 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 Extractable Chloride (")

GC1 0.13 G02 0.47 G03 0.33 G04 0.15 Sol 0.13 S02 0.14 S03 0.17 S04 0.14 S05 0.19 0.28 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.12 0.17

0. 40 0.15 0.75 0.49 0.45
0. 51 0.31 0.53 0.16 0.14 0.17 0.85 0,09 0.85 0.14 0.19 0.13 0.19 0.16 0.11
  • POSA

= Poa

~Sandbar ii BRTE

= 3romus tectorum SIAL

= Yss iir~>um a t>ssimum PHLO

=

h ox on i7opsa PUTR

= FursSsia tr> entata ARTR

= 7Crremisiaaanen ata

~ 0

~ 0

Table 3

SUMMARY

Of DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS, 1986 Low Volume Waste Cooling Tower Blowdown Month Jan 0.5 1.5 TSS (lbs/d)

Ave Max 0/G (lbs/d)

Ave Hax 0.3 3.1 Vol (103 A;e 10.9 gal/d)

Max 23.4 TRC (mg/1)

Hax c 0.1 2.7 7.1 Vol (10 gal/d)

Ave Max Feb 1.4 17.4 O.l 0.3 11.9 25.3 c 0.1 1.8 4.1 Mar Apr May 1.2 0.9 4.5 5.3 3.9 25.1 O.l 0.7 0.1 0.8 0.3 1.9 11.0 14.0 14;5 16.5 29.5 28.9 c P.l

<0.1 1.4 3.3 0.0 2.3 6.1 0.0 1.4 4.9 0.1 0.6 14.1 20.3 2.6 5.6 5.3 0.1 0.9 10.7 15.0 i 0.1 2.7 4.9 Aug Sep Oct Nov 3.6 1.9 1.2 2.1 15.4 12.6 6.6 20.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.8 0.2 0.2 0.8

12. 2 9.5 11.6 10.9 20.0 15.9 17.7 17.6

< 0.1 c O.l 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.2 3.5 3.8 4.7 4.3 Dec Permi t Limt 1.5 18.9

0. 2 I

2.5 2.4 14.5 20

31. 2 40

< 0.1 0.1 0.8 1.7 4.6 9.4

~ 0 Pt

311) 311

>>I ~

311 312 m

~0 mls>>e Is>>le K>>

p, P1 oj,

~'S

'r

~

p 0

Co

~

E)

~

~

~4+0 g )

>>>>l la>>>>

M ee ASM>>fl4e I

SIIIIOK>>to 4e a a a 4 a as!'

4)taa 0 )

~eal ~

eeeee j

~CKAO

~0 WS

~d

~oa gs>>>> csee m

m C) 310 3L?

"C)

$0)+.+

.C'4 a 0,

'I rl 0 F

~'I

(.'.

) I II WII. +

AKOao

~ee J kc

>>AL rc ~

C..

>>TIKI 0 to

~ a OIIIceelLA Pj ee

~ ~

91 4 ~

otl~

~

~ICA>>

44 aa 0

4 1

4

~0>>>>)

r 4) ll>>C~ IO) 9 AK>>I 312 3LC 00

))I IM I MI

~~ttt h

~ 0

(

~<<>>

tl 40~

~a >>4 eaa I

I C3n tD I/)

tl

'I r

frr

~ ///

~ll~

l j

I I

c

+

S CIH I ~

04 0t>>l(

Q.foot jo

'Cle asia CC>>ll>>

4 asses sees Its late 404IO e ae I

CIO e It~ e a e Oa aaaaae 4C ~ 'II>>

~ >>KII>>

~AC>>>>0

)

a eaa 4

t>>I ~ t>>IC0 00.

COa at>>OIIO IO 00

~ tt>>alt>>c 3C2 3L3 a>>>>ttl>> OO 0

Wlcc>>

~

Ce>>l 0

easer I

~Iea 3

34l.

>> cc ~

a>>ac

'I 0

1

~

M

~ IV 449aaaa 9)

'S)

A

)

~s>>et>>II>>oc Q Sotlt Cttse

~ ~

OIOIA EMERGENCY PLAN ZONE MAP 10 ))IIIIIADIU)

A SIIPPI Y SYSTEM

~I~ ~ cl>>>>r Mt 821)21

Q.O e.e 5.0 LEGEND 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1 985 1986 7.0 5.5 5.0 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 2.

SOIL pll, 1980-1986

~ 0

100 LEGEND 90 80 70 60 5

N 50 5

40 1980 1981 1983 1984 1985 1986 30 20 10 0

G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FiGURE 3.

SOIL CONDUCTIVITY, 1980,

1981, and 1983-1986

~ ~

200 LEGEND 180 180 140 120 I 100 1 980 1981 1982 1 983 1985 1986 80 80 40 20 0

G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SOS SITE FIGURE 4.

SOIL SULFATE, 1980-1986

~ ~

lk

~\\

.eo LEGEND

.72

.e4

.se g

Ad C35 AO I.m 1 980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986

.24

~1e

.oe G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02-S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 5.

SOIL CALCIUM (lJt I), 1980-1986

I ~

~ ~

LEGEND 1981 1 982 1 983 1984 1 985.

1986 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SOS SITE FIGURE 6.

SOIL MAGNESIUM (lit I), 1980-1986

.20 LEGEND

.1d o1$

g

.12 h

.10 I.Od 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986

.Od

.04

.02 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SiTE FIGURE 7.

SOIL SODIUt1 (Wt X), 1980-1986

.50 A5 AO

.35 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986

.15

.10

.05 0

G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 8.

SOIL POTASSIUM (lit ~~), 1980-1986

4

LEGEND 30 C9 ~

I oa20 O ~X Cf 1d 1980 1981 1 982 1983 1984 1985 1986 10 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 9.

SOIL BICARBONATE, 1980-1986

l N

400 LEGEND 350 300 I

200 I 200 C9 ED CD~ 150 1980 1981 1 982 1 983 1984 1 985 1986 100 50 0

G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 10.

SOIL FLUORIDF., 1980-1986

20 LEGEND 16 16 I 12 g 10 CO C)

CC 6

1 980 1981 1982 1 983 1984 S

1 985 1986 0

G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 11.

SOIL Cl(LORIOE, 1980-1986

l

1 d.o LEGEND 1 e.d 15.e 1hA 13.2 1 2.0 5

10od 1 980 1981 1982 1 983 1984 1 985 1986 s.e dA 7.2 e.o G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SOS SITE FIGURE 12.

SOIL COPPER, 1980-1986

LEGEND 1980 1 981 1 982 1 983 1984 1 985 1986 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 13.

SOIL LEAD, 1980-1986

.80

.72 Ad g

.hO CO C75..32 LEGEND 1980 1981 1982 1'983 O

1 984 1985 1986

.24

+1S

.08 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 14.

SOIL CAD1)IUH, 1900-1906

~a ~

I C

y

25.0 LEGEND 22,5 20.0 17.5 15.0 12.5 1 980 1 981 1 982 1983 1984-1985 1986 5.0 0

G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 15.

SOIL CHROMIUI1, 1980-1986

~NO t

~

~

'I

30.0 LEGEND 27.8 25.2 22.8 I 20.h 1 8.0 15.8 1980 1981 1982 1 983 1984 1985 1986 13.2 10.8 8A 8.0 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 16.

SOIL NICKEL, 1980-1986

.0100 LEGEND

.0091

.0082

.0073 1 983 1 984 1 985 1986

.0084

.0055 C9 CD o004d

.0037

.0028

.0019

.0010 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 17.

SOIL IIERCURY, 1983-1986

yO

90 60 VO I 80 ce 50 8

LEGEND 1 980 1981 1982 1 983 1984 1 985 1986 40 30 20 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SOS SITE FIGURE 18.

SOIL ZINC, 1980-1986

~ 0

~ 0 I

10 LEGEND B

I B

C9 CD DK 1 980 1981 1982 1 983 1984 1 985 1986 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 19.

COPPER IN POA SANDDERGII, 1980-1986

~ 0

/

)

20 LEGEND 1d g 12 g 10 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 20.

COPPER IN BROHUS TECTORUI1, 1980-1986

~ 0 C

~

Jf

.250 LEGEND

.225

.200

.1 75

Ã

.150 o125

.100 1 980 1981 1982 1 983 1984 1 985 1986

.075

.050

.025 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 21.

SULFATE It< POA SAHDBERGII, 1980-1986

.50 LEGEND AO

.35 Q

.30

.25 1 980 1 981 1 982 1 983 1984 1 985 1986

.15

.10 o05 0

G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SOS SITE FIGURE 22.

SULFATE IN BROIIUS TECTORUM, 1980-1986

0 I

li

(e

.50 Ad AO

.35 M9

.30 CK C)

.25 LEGEND 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986

.15

.10

.05 0

G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 23.

CHLORIDE IN POA SANDBERGII, 1980-1986

~ 0

.80 LEGEND

.42 M

K<

.as C)

~

.~o 1 980 1981 1982 1 983 1984 1985 1986

.12

.os G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 24.

CHLORIDE IH BROHUS TECTORUll, 1930-1936

0 f

ti WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O. Box 968

~ 3000 George Washington Way

~ Richland, Washington 99352 Docket No.

50-397 April 23, 1987 G02-87-146 Document Control Desk U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555

Dear Sirs:

Subject:

Reference:

NUCLEAR PLANT NO.

2 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT Facility Operating License NPF-21 Appendix B - Environmental Protection Plan Per Section 5.4.1 of the referenced

EPP, please find attached the subject report for the 1986 calendar year.

Very truly yo rs, G.

C.

rensen

Manager, Regulatory Programs

Attachment:

As stated cc:

JB flartin/NRC RV R Dodds/Resident Inspector/901A WL Fitch/EFSEC

<<0

,l

.Ii tk