ML17278B094
| ML17278B094 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 11/12/1986 |
| From: | Sorensen G WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| To: | Adensam E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| GO2-86-1022, NUDOCS 8611180363 | |
| Download: ML17278B094 (6) | |
Text
J ttJ
'REGUL Y INFORNATION DISTRIBUTI SYSTEN (RIDS>.
ACCESSION NBR 8611180363 DOC. DATE: 86/11/12 NOTARIZED:
NO DOCKET ¹ FACIL: 50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Pro Ject>
Unit 2>
Mash ington Public Poue 050003'P7 AUTH. MANE AUTHOR AFFILIATION SORENSEN> Q. C.
Washington Public Power Supply SMstem.
RECIP. NANE RECIPIENT AFFILIATION ADENSAN> E C.
BNR Prospect Directorate 3
SUBJECT:
Reiterates request For interim approval oF Rev 3a to facility pump 0 valve inservice insp program submitted 851226. Util considers Rev 3 to provide added assurance of-matl quality 8r public sa fet g.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
A047D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR t ENCL
(
SIZE:
TITLE:
QR Submxttal:
Inservice Inspection/Test1ng NOTES:
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NANE BNR ADTS BNR PD3 LA BRADFUTE> J COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
~ 1 0
1 RECIP IENT COP IES ID CODE/NANE LTTR ENCL BWR EB 1
BMR PD3 PD 01
~
5 5
INTERNAL: ACRS AEOD/PTB REO FIL IB, 04 ih 10 10 1
1 1
1
- DN/LFNB ELD/HDS2 NRR/TANG Rl'N5 1
0 1
0 1
1 1
EXTERNAL.
LPDR NSIC 03 05 1
1 1
NRC PDR 02
~
1 1
TOTAL NUNBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 29 ENCL 26
~
~
k C
Washington Public Power Supply System P.O. Box 968 3000 George Washington Way Richland, Washington 99352 (509) 372-5000 November 12, 1986 G02-86-1022 Sbiii803b3 Bbiii2 PDR ADOCK 05000397 PDR Docket No.
50-397 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attn:
E.
G.
- Adensam, Project Director BWR Project Directorate No.
3 Division of BWR Licensing U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Dear Ms.
Adensam:
Subject:
NUCLEAR PLANT NO.
2 PUMP AND VALVE INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM PLAN REVISION 3a INTERIM APPROVAL
Reference:
2) 3)
4) 5)
6)
- Letter, E.G.
Adensam (NRC) to G.C.
Sorensen (SS)
"Status of NRC Review of Pump and Valve Inservice Inspection Program Plan, Revision 3, and Preservice Inspection Program Relief Request",
dated September 10, 1986
- Letter, G.C.
Sorensen (SS) to E.G.
Adensam (NRC),
dated December 26, 1985
- Letter, G,C.
Sorensen (SS) to E.G.
Adensam (NRC),
G02-86-211, dated March 12, 1986
- Letter, G.C.
Sorensen (SS) to E.G.
Adensam (NRC),
G02-86-679, dated July 22, 1986
- Letter, W.R. Butler (NRC) to G.C.
Sorensen (SS),
dated June 10, 1985
- Letter, G. C. Sorensen (SS) to W.
R. Butler (NRC),
G02-85-319, dated June 17, 1985 The purpose of this letter is to reiterate the request for interim approval of Revision 3a to the WNP-2 Pump and Valve Inservice Inspection Program submitted per Reference 2 (attached).
Reference 1 informed the Supply System as to the status of the formal review of the WNP-2 Pump and Valve Inservice Inspection Program but fai led to address interim approval of the program as was requested in References 2,
3 and 4 (December
- 1985, March 1986, and July 1986).
Interim
I I.
'1
E.
G.
Adensam
'age Two November 12, 1986 PUMP AND VALVE INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM PLAN REV.
3a INTERIM APPROVAL approval should not pose a concern.
Revision 2 to the program received interim approval in the WNP-2 Safety Evaluation Report Supplement 4,
NUREG-0892 dated
- December, 1983.
Supply System personnel met with the NRC staff and EGSG (the NRC contractor) in April, 1985 (Reference 5,
June 1985) to discuss Revision 2 and subsequent changes resulting from lessons learned due to transitioning from construction to operation.
Reference 5 forwarded questions from this meeting to the Supply System which were answered in the submittal of Revision 3 (Reference 6, June 1985).
During the next 6 months of operation, additional changes to the program were identified and submitted as Revision 3a (Reference 2, attached).
In
- summary, a solid basis exists upon which to grant interim approval:
Revision 2 had interim approval by the staff; the staff, the NRC contractor, and Supply System personnel have met and discussed Revision 3 to the program; and the resulting questions from this meeting ha've been answered.
As stated in Reference 6, the Supply System considers Revision 3 to provide added assurance of material quality and public safety over that provided in Revision 2.
With the reviews conducted to date, the Supply System cannot discern any apparent obstacles to granting interim approval to Revision 3a.
Very truly yours, G.
C. Sorensen, Manager Regulatory Programs PLP/RPW/tmh Attachment cc JO Bradfute -
NRC JB Martin -
NRC RV E
Revell -
BPA NS Reynolds -
BLCP&R NRC Site Inspector
1