ML17278A536

Preoperational Environ Radiological Monitoring Rept, 780301 - 840119. W/851211 Ltr

ML17278A536
Person / Time
Site:	Columbia
Issue date:	01/19/1984
From:	Card C, Prince J, Sorensen G WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
NUDOCS 8512310348
Download: ML17278A536 (542)

Text

. ~ l.4.AHp 4 0 P4 . 44 NJkr0 4

' ~ 4 ~

TS MASTER FILE

,'.REQU RY INFORMATION DIBTRIBU N SYSTE lv V 78'-$9 ACCESSION NBR: 8512310348 DOC. DATE: 84/01/19, NOTARIZED: N 0

'FAC I L: 50-39'7 MPPSS Nuclear Progecti Unit 2i Mashington Publ c P owe i 05000397 AUTH. MANE AUTHOR AFFILIATION RINCEi J. K. Mashington Public Power Supply System.

ARDi C. J. Mashington Public Power Supply System SORENBENi t'. C. Washington Public Power Supply System ltr..

RECIP. NANE RECXPXENT AFFILIATION BUB JECT: "Preop erati onal Environ Radiological Nonit oring Rept.

780301 840119. M/80 211 CODE: IE01D COPXEB RFCEIVED: LTR i ENCL J SIZE: ~$ +

~Z/~>l'IBTRIBUTXQN TXTLE: Qeneral (50 Dkt)-Xnsp Rept/Notice oF Violation Response NOTES: I 05000397 OL: 12/20/83 RECIPXENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NANE LTTR ENCL ID CODE/N*NE LTTR ENCL BMR PD3 PD 1 1 BR*DFUTEiJ 1 1 INTERNAL: ACRS 2 2 *EBD 1 ELD/HDS2 1 IE FILE 01 XE/DEPER/EPB 1 IE/DI/ORPB ,1

. IE/EB 1 NRR ROE. NL 1 1 RR D ~BR 1 ERNAL: 24X

~ LPDR 1

~ NRC PDR NBIC 1 1 TOTAL NUNBER QF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR ih ENCL fh

C 0 r.I gF I>

Washington Public Power Supply System P.O. Box 968 3000 George Washington Way Richland, Washington 99352 (509) 372-5000 December 11, 1985 Admi.ni s trator Region V Office of Inspection and Enforcement Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 walnut Creek, California 94596

SUBJECT:

REVISED PREOPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL.

RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT FOR MAP-2 Attached is the final revision of the Preoperational Environmental Honitoring Repot t for HNP-2 which was origjnally distributed in 1984.

Please feel free to contact Catherine Card at (509) 377-8066 if you have any questions concerning this report.

Very truly yours, Regulatory Programs GCS/CJC/vlc Attachments

4

~ ~

4

Washington Public 3'ower Supply System 3000 George Washington Way P.O. Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352-0968 (509)372-50 August 29, 1985 G02-85-498 Docket No. 50-397 Mr. J. B. Martin Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450'aria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Subject:

NUCLEAR PLANT NO. 2 SEMI-ANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT JANUARY 1 to JUNE 30,'985 (ATTACHED)

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50.36a (a} (2}, the subject report is herewith being submitted.

Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. R. G. Graybeal, Manager, WNP-2 Health Physics/Chemistry.

Very truly yours, Cl~i4 ~

C. M. Powers WNP-2 Plant Manager vih Attachment cc: JO Bradfute - NRC RC DeYoung - NRC C Eschels - EFSEC D Jaquish - DOE D Sherman - Amer. Nuclear Insurers TR Strong - DSHS AD Toth - NRC Site Document Control Desk - NRC

0 Washington Public Power Supply System'.Q.

Box 968 3000 George Washington Way Richland, Washington 99352 (509) 372-5000 May 15, 1985 Mr. William L. Fitch Executive Secretary '

Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council 820 East 5th Avenue MS-PY- ll Olympia, Washington 98504

Subject:

NUCLEAR PLANT NO. 2 OPERATIONAL ECOLOGICAL: MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT: 1984

Reference:

Site Certification Agreement, WNP-2 Article V.B.7 In accordance with the requirements of the Site Certification Agreement for WNP-2, the Supply System is submitting six copies of the 1984 Operational Ecological Monitoring Report for WNP-2.

Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact R. A. Chitwood, Manager of Emergency Planning and Environmental Programs.

Very truly yours

.C G. C. S ensen, Manager Regulatory Programs

Enclosures:

Operational Ecological Monitoring Program for Nuclear Plant 2, 1984 Annual Report (6 copies) cc: See attached list.

I I

PREOPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL

~

RADIOLOGICALMONITORING PROGRAM WNP-2 .

<<<Ci 1

~ g c ~

w~Y~qa

.WNi/)'p,i, ~ !/L g: .

1985 WA S I I I Y G T 0 X P L' t. I C0 iV I'. R, SUPPLY SYSTEM

'8+~2ggp34g 840i~+

ADacx 05000~~

PDR

0 C

E

PREOPERATIONAL ENYIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM WNP-2 JUNE 1984 Revised l985 Prepared By J.K. Prince C.J. Card W.,Davis III I I WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM

FJ I

]

1

')

lJ 3

I

'k FJ>>

q y"I

~

J

PREOPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM WNP-2 JUNE 1984 REVISED 1985 APPROVALS:

MNP-2 Plant Manager:

C. M. Power

~<-A Date

-Z MNP-2 Licensing Manage'r':

P.. L. Powell Da e

'4~

l R. G. Gray al Date Emergency Planning and Environmental Programs:

R. A. Chitwood Date Originated By:

. J. Card Date

g 0) il I

.g g

I

~

03 g

]

J 3

,I

Acknowledgments .

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge L.S. Schleder and J.L. Hickam for their diligent sample handling and collection and R.M. Craig, l.E. Nudge and H.L. Hiller for their leadership and program direction during the preoperational phase.

Oj "l

5 g

Ol 3

P I g I

S 3

I y

/

I J

I 1

+.!

J

WASHINGTON NUCLEAR PLANT 82 PREOPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

- MARCH 1978 THROUGH JANUARY 19, 1984 CONTENTS Section Title ~Pa e rj~

~

ABSTRACT . ~ ~

1.0 ,'NTRODUCTION. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

H

<<3 .2.0 SAMPLING PROGRAM ~ ~ ~ ~ 2-1 lC 2.1 SAMPLING METHODS AND PROCEDURES ~ ~ ~ 2~2 2.1.1 Air Particulate and Radioiodine. 2~2 2.1. 2 Ambient Radiation Measurement 2-2 2.1. 3 Terrestrial Soil. 2~3 2.1.4 Garden Produce ~ ~ ~ 2~3 2.1.5 Milke ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2~3 2.1. 6 Surface and Drinking Water 2~3 2.1.7 Well (Ground Water). ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 2-3 2.1. 8 Shoreline Sediment . ~ ~ ~ ~ 2-4 2,1.9 Fl Sh ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2-4

" 2.2 2.2.1 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES AND CALCULATION MODELS .

Analytical Procedures for Radiochemical Analysis, Nl3S Laboratory 2-4 2-4 2.2.1.1 Calculational'odels. ~ 0 2-4 2.2.2 Analytical Procedures for Radiochemical Analysis for Eberline Services Division 2-5

2. 2.2.1 Analytical Detection Limits and Count Rate 2-5 2.2.2.2 Air Particulates .

'-6 2.2.2.3 Radioiodine. 2-6 2.2.2.4 Drinking, Surface and Ground Water . 2-6 2.2.2.5 ~

Soil and Sediment. ~ ~ 2-6

~

2.2.2.6 Vegetation/Garden Produce or Fish 2-6 2.2.2.7 Milk . 2~7 2.2.3 Ambient Radiation Dosimetrics 2-7

<<j

'<<) 2.2;3.1 Supply System Environmental TLDs. 2~7 2.2.3.2 U.S. Testing Dosimetry Service ~ << ~ 2~7 2.2.3.3 Supply System Pressurized Ion Chambers. 2~7 2.3 OPERATIONAL PHASE NONROUTINE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. ~ ~ 2-8 3.0

SUMMARY

AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 3-1

<<',J

<< i 3.1

SUMMARY

TABLE NOTES . 3-3

MASHINGTON NUCLEAR PLANT $ 2 PREOPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT MARCH 1978 THROUGH JANUARY 19, 1984 CONTENTS Section Title Pacae 4.0 COMMENTS AND TERMS PERTINENT TO DATA TABLES 4-1 4.1, SAMPLE DEVIATIONS . 4-1 Air Sample Deviations . 4-1 Soil Sample Deviations 4-2 quarterly TLD Deviations . 4-2 Annual TLD's . 4-2 PIC Monitoring Discrepancies..

Mater Sample Deviations

... 4-3 '-3

=

Sediment Sample Deviations 4-3 Milk Sample Deviations. 4-3

'Fish Sample Deviations. 4' Garden Produce Sample 'Deviations 4 5.0 EQUALITY CONTROL.

5.1 EBERLINE LABORATORY.ANALYTICAL SAMPLE l}UALITY CONTROL . 5-1 5.2 NUS RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY qUALITY CONTROL DATA. 5-57 5.3 U.S. TESTING EQUAL'ITY CONTROL 5-165 5.4 SUPPLY SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL TLD EQUALITY CONTROL . 5-169 5.5 S'PATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT.'OF. SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, SPLIT SAMPLE PROGRAM . 5-185

6.0 REFERENCES

~

6-1 11

~-

r MASHINGTON NUCLEAR PLANT 82 PREOPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT MARCH 1978 THROUGH JANUARY 19, 1984 (TABLES).

Number Title Pa<ac 2-1. 0 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Plan 2-11 2-2. 0 REMP Sample Implementation 2-14 2-3.0 "REMP Sample Locations by Sector 2-1 5 2-4.0 .1983 Land'Use Census Within Five (5) Radial Miles of MNP-2 2-19

. 2-5.0 =Distances From MNP-2* to Nearest Points of Interest Within Ten (10) Mile Radius 2-.20 2-6. 0 Analytical Methods - NUS Radiological Laboratory 2-21 2-7.0 NUS Analytical Detection Limits-Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) 2-26 2-8.0 Detection Capabilities for Environmental Sample Analysis Lower Limit of Detection (LLD} 2-28.

2-9. 0 Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples 2-29 2-10.0 Dose/Dose Cottmitment Limiting Conditions 2-30 2-11.0 NUS Analytical Action Levels 2-31 "3-1.0 .Suttmary Air Sample Data, All Years 3-10

.'"',"=" 3-1.1 Summary Mater Sample Data, All Years 3-.1 0 3-1. 2 Suttmary Sediment Sample Data, 'All Years 3-11 3-1. 3 Summary Soil Sample, Data, All Years 3-11 3-1.4 .Suttmary Milk Sample Data, All Years 3-12 3-1. 5 Summary. Fish Sample Data, All Years 3-12 3-1. 6 Suttmary Produce Sample Data, All Years 3-13 3-1. 7 Summary TLD Sample Data, 1982-1983 3-13 f m 3". 2-0 Air Data Suttmary by Year 3-1 4 3-2.1 Mater Data Summary by Year 3-16 3-2e 2 Sediment Data Suttmary 1978 3-21 3~2e 3 Soil Data. Summary by, Year 3~27 3-2.4 Milk Data Suttmary by Year 3-33 3-2.5 Fish Data Summary by Year 3-35 3-2.6 Produce Data Suttmary by Year 3-41 3~2 ~ 7 quarterly TLD Data by Year 3-47 f 3-2. 8 Other/Annual TLD Data by Year 3-48 11i

WASHINGTON NUCLEAR PLANT 8'2 PREOPERATIONAL ENY IRONMENTAL. RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT'ARCH 1978 THROUGH JANUARY 19, 1984

'(TABLES)

Number Title ... ~Pae 4-1.0 Air: Gross Beta . 4-5 4-1.1 Air: Beryllium-7 4-26 4-1.2 Air: Cesium-1'34 4-27 4-1.3 Air: Cesium-137 4-29 4-1.4 Air: Cerium-144 4-31 4-1'. 5 Air: Iodine-131 4-32 4-1.6 Air: Niobium-95 4-46 4-1.7 Air: Zirconium-95 4-47

'-,2.0 . Mater: Gross Alpha 4-48 4-2.1: Mater: Barium-140 4-49 4-2.2 Mater: Gross Beta 4-52 4-2.3 Water: Cesium-1 34 1 e ~ 4-55 4-2.4 Mater: Cesium-1'37 . 4-58 4-2.5 'Mater: Cobalt-58 4-61 4-2.6 Mater: Cobalt-60 4-64 4-2. 7 Water: Iodine-131 4-67 4-2.8 Mater: Iron-59 4-68 4-2.9 Mater: Lanthanum-140'-2.10 4-71 Mater: Manganese-54 4-74 4-2.11 Mater: Niobium-95 4-77 4-2.12 Mater: Strontium-89 4-80 4-2.13 Water: Strontium-90 4-81 4-2.14 Water: Tin-113 4-82 4-2.15 Tritium in Surface Mater/Drinking Mater 4-83 4-2.16 Tritium in Ground Mater 4-84 4-2.17 Mater: Zinc-65 4-85 4-2.18 Mater: Zirconium-95 4-88 4-3.0 Sediment: Actinium-228 4-91 4-3.1 Sediment: Bismuth-214 4-92 4-3.2 Sediment: Cesium-1 34 4-93 4-3.3 Sediment: Cesium-137 4-94

WASHINGTON NUCLEAR PLANT g2 PREOPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

- MARCH 1978 THROUGH JANUARY (TABLES) 19, -1984 Number Title ~Pa e 4-3.4 Sediment: Cobalt-58 4-95 4-3. 5 Sediment: Cobalt-60 4-96 4-3. 6 Sediment: Lead-212 4-97 4-3.7 Sediment: Lead-21 4 4-98 4-3.8 Sediment: Manganese-,54 4-99 4-3.9 Sediment: Niobium-95 4-1 00 4-3.10 Sediment: Potassium-40 4-101 4-3.11 Sediment: . Radium-226 4-102 4-3.12 Sediment: Thallium-208 4-103 4-3.13 Sediment: Zinc-65 4-104

'4-3.14 Sediment: Zirconium-95 4-105 4-4. 0 Soil: Actinium-228 4-106 4-4.1'-4:2 Soil: Bismuth-212 4-107 Soil: Bismuth-214 4-108

~ ~

$ 4.3 4 4.4 So11'oil:

Cesium-134 Cesium-137 4-109 4-110 .

~

4-4.5 Soil: Cobalt-58 4-111 4-4.6 Soil: Cobalt-60 4-112 4-4.7 Soil: Iron-59 4-113 4-4.8 Soil: Lead-212 4-114 4-4.9 Soil: Lead-214. 4-115 4-4.10 Soil: Manganese-54 4-116 4-4.11 Soil: Niobium-95 4-117 4-4.12 Soil: Potassium-40 4-118 4-4.13 Soil: Radium-226 4-119 4-4.14'oil: Strontium-90 4-120 4-4.15 Soil: Thallium-208 4-121 4-4.16 Soil: Zinc-65 4-122 4-4.17 Soil: Zirconium-95 4-123

WASHINGTON NUCLEAR PLANT 82 PREOPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

~ le MARCH 1978 THROUGH JANUARY 19, 1984 (TABLES)

Number Title ~Pa e 4-5.0 Milk: Barium-140 4-124 4-5.1 Milk: Cesium-134 4-128 4-5.2 Milk: Cesium-137 4-132 4-5.3 Milk: Iodine-131 4-136 4-5.'4" Milk: Lanthanum-140 4-138 5

'-5.

Milk: Potassium-40 4-1 42 4-6.0 Fish: Cesium-134 4-144 4-6.1 Fish: Cesium-137 4-145 4-6.2 Fish: Cobalt-58 4-,1 47 4-6.3 Fish: Cobalt-60 4-149 4-6. 4 Fi sh: Irop-59 4-151 4-6. 5 Fish: Manganese-54 4-152 4-6. 6 ~ Fish: 'iobium-95 .'4-154 4-6. 7 Fish: Potassium-40 4-155 4-6. 8 Fish: Zinc-65. 4-156 4-6.9 Fish: Zirconium-95 4-158 4>>7.0 Produce: Cesium-134 4-159

'-7.1 Produce: Cesium-137 4-161 4-7.2 Produce: Cobalt-58 4-165 4-7.3 Produce: Cobal t-60 4-168 4-7.4 Produce: Iodine-131 4-171 4-7.5 Produce: Manganese-54 4-173 4-7.6 Produce: Niobium-95 4-176 4-7.7 Produce: Potassium-40 4-1 79 4-7.8 Produce: Zinc-65 4-180 4-7.9 Produce: Zirconium-95 4-183 4-8.0 quarterly TLD 4-186 4-8.1 Annual TLD 4-206 5-1.0 equal ity Control 1978 5-2 5-1.1 Results of EPA Interlaboratory Comparisons 1978 5-24

IRIASHINGTON NUCLEAR PLANT g2 PREOPERATIONAL .ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT PARCH 1978 THROUGH JANUARY 19, 1984 (TABLES)

Number Title ~Pa e 5-1.2 Environmental 0uality Control Analyses Sumaary 1979 5-29 5-1. 3 EPA Interc'omparison Results 1979 5-30 5-1. 4 USDOE guality Assessment Program 1979 5-31 s'-33 5-1.5 Environmental guality Control Analyses Summary 1980 5-1,. 6 EPA.Intercomparison Results 1980 5-34 5-1. 7 .USDOE.::guality Assessment Program 1980 5-36 5-1.8 En'vi jonmental guality Control Analyses Sumnary 1981 5-38 5-1.9 EPA Intercomparison Results 1981 5-39 5-1.10 EPA Intercomparison Results (EMSL-LV) 5-42 5-1.11 USDOE guality Assessment Program 1981 5-43 5-1.12 Environmental guality Control Summary Report 19821 5-44 5-1 .13 Environmental USEPA - Eberline 1982 5-48 5-1.14 USDOE guality Assessment Program 1982 5-50 5-1.15 guality Control Report - 1983 (January - June) 5-51 5-1.16 USEPA Cross Check Program Summary (January - June) 1983 5-.55 5-3.1 International Intercompari son of Environmental.

Dosimeters (U.S. Testing Data) 5-168 5-4.1 Sixth International Intercompari son of Environmental Dosimeters 5-172 (FIGURES)

Number Title ~Pa e

~

2-1 Sample Locations Nithin 10 Mile Radius

'EMP 2-9 2-2 REMP Sample Locations Outside 10 Mile Radius 2-10 Gross Beta in Air-1982 3-5 3-2 Gross Beta in Air-1983 3-6 3-3 quarterly TLDs-1982-1983 3-7 3-4 Results of Duncan Multiple Range Test-1982 TLD Data 3-8 3-5 Results of Duncan Multiple Range Test-1983 TLD Data 3-9

MASHINGTON NUCLEAR PLANT 82 PREOPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT MARCH 1978 THROUGH JANUARY 19, 1984 (FIGURES)

Number Title ~Pa e D.S. Testing Duality Assurance-New TLD Dosimeters . 5-1 66 5-2 U.S. Testing equality Assurance-TLD Dosimeter Processing 5-167 5-3 Supply System Environmental TLD Preparation-Use-Eval uation Cycle 5-170 Supply System TLD Evaluation 5-171

ABSTRACT A preoperational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REHP) was initiated in 1978 in order to provide a baseline of radiological data. This data will be utilized in the future to evaluate the impact of effluent releases of radioactivity on the surrounding environs as a result t

of the operation of WNP-2. The REMP was designed to meet both regulatory requirements and scientifically valid concerns.

Media which were evaluated included: air, river, drinking and well water, soil, river sediment, milk, produce, fish, and direct radiation (TLDs). All data are in concert with "

results previously published 'by other organizations on the Hanford Site. Generally, radionuclide concentrations in sampled media are at or below the detection 'liihit. The

,few exceptions include very'low levels of activity from Cobalt-60, Cesium-137 and Tritium in a few media as a result of worldwide fallout'rom atmospheric weapons testing and/or historical Hanford Site operations.

tV+ tlI~%1 fg 0) 8 I'

\

J

~

03

-3 C

5]

J

'P "1

C~

J I

.J

1.0 INTRODUCTION

A comprehensive environmental surveillance program is an important com-ponent of verification that designed nuclear plant operating controls for effluent releases of radioactive material are functioning as intended.

Using the guidance presented in applicable regulatory documents, the radiological environmental monitoring program was designed to satisfy the criteria for a multi-plant site and was implemented in 1978, based on projected fuel loading in March 1980 for WNP-2. Minor. modifications to the original program have been made during the preoperational phase to accommodate changing regulatory requirements and to ensure a smooth transition into the operations phase program for WNP-2. The preopera-tional phase program was initiated. on March 1, 1978, and ended in January 1984 with initial criticality at WNP-2. This report summarizes the results of measurements from samples collected during this period.

~ 'I The preoperational program of's'ampling and measuring. radioactivity in the various environmental media permitted a general characterization of the existing radiation levels and concentrations prior to plant operation.

program al'so provided an indication of the degree oF natural 'his variation 'in these levels and concentrations that can be expected regard-

>I*

less of plant. operational .impacts.

Detailed information concerning site characteristics and environmental interfaces such as geography, demography, ecology, hydrology, geology and meteorology, are contained in the Environmental Report-Operating License Stage, and Final Safety Analysis Report for WNP-2 and will not be included in this. report, though these interfaces were an important aspect in the

" design of the radiological environmental 'monitoring program.

7

]

4 rw f:

~3

2.0 SAMPLING PROGRAM The preoperational program was designed to provide measurements of radi-ation and radioactive materials in specific environmental pathways and of

) certain radionuclides for which the highest potential dose commitment to a member of the public is expected to occur due to the operation of WNP-2. The preoperational program was implemented in three stages as indicated below:

Stage I Two years of sampling for:

Direct Radiation Fish Vegetation Sediment Stage II One year of sampling for:

Airborne (particulate)

Milk ( isotopic)

River (Surface) water Drinking water Ground water Stage III Six (6) months of sampling for:

Airborne .(iodine)

Milk (iodine)

The above indicated sampling period for each stage'is the minimum allowed :.

'er regulatory requirement. The WNP-2 preoperational,phase program these minimum sampling periods in all cases. Table 2-1.0 details

'xc'ceded the operational phase monitoring plan; with a total of seventy-two (72) sampling stations. All operational phase program sampling was imple-mented during the preoperational phase program. Sample locations keyed to sample type at each location are graphically represented in Figure 2-1. Sample locations outside. the 10 mile radius of WNP-2 containment are represented in Figure 2-2. Table 2-2.0 lists the implementation schedule and identifies changes, made to the program between March 1978 and January 1984. All sampling stations are listed in Table 2-3.0 by.

sector, radial distance from WNP-2 containment, and sample type(s).

Analytical contractors for the preoperational REMP were 1) Eberline Services Division, Midwest Laboratory, Chicago, Illinois from March 1978 through June 1982; 2) Eberline Services Division, Albuquerque Facility Laboratory, Albuquerque, New Mexico from July 1982 through June 1.983; and 2-1

3) NVS Corporation, Environmental Services Division, Radiological Labora-tory, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania from July 1983 through January 1984.

Dosimetric (TLD) services were contracted to U. S. Testing from March

'1978 through Mar'ch'1982 when the Supply System Dosimetry Group, Radio-s logical Support Services, became the primary. supplier for environmental TLD measurements.

During September 1983, land use census information was updated using data obtained from survey questionnaires completed during the distribution of Emergency Broadcast System (EBS) radios. The EBS radios we'e distributed jointly by the Supply System Emergency Preparedness Group and the Franklin-Benton Counties Emergency Management Organization to residents of the area within a ten (10) mile radius'of the plant site. Tables 2-4.0 and 2-5.0 are summaries of the results of the EBS survey questions that were of i'mportance in maintaining a valid monitoring program. They indicate the locations of milk animals, vegetable gardens, livestock and residents within a five mile and a 10 mile radius from'NP-2 containment.

2.1 Samplin Methods and Procedures To achieve .meaningful and useful data from the monitoring program, sampling methods and procedures were required which provided samples representative of the potential exposure pathways in the .vicinity of the plant. During the preoperational phase of the program, samples were collected to obtain background radiological information and to acquire the experience with and optimization of sampling methodologies and procedural format with respect to.site specific conditions.

2.1.1 Air Particulate and Radioiodine 1

Air samplers were run continuously and the filter and charcoal cartridge exchanged weekly. The samples were collected using a por'table, low volume, constant flow air sampling unit. Since 1983 the sampling. units have been internally set, and calibrated to maintain a 1.5 cfm sampling flow rate. The sampling units with air particulate filter and charcoal cartridge were placed in well ventilated metal weather housings on elevated platforms. Glass fiber (47 millimeter) filters were used for particulate sampling.

Activated charcoal cartridges were used to collect radioiodine samples. The filter and cartridge were removed from the air sample and placed in protective containers for shipping. Instru-mentation flow rates and other pertinent operational parameters were recorded and submitted with the samples for analysis.

2.1.2 Ambient Radiation Measurements Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs) were placed in the field in pairs at designated locations and exchanged on either a quarterly and annual frequency. The dosimeters were sealed in weatherproof containers in the laboratory and placed approximately one (1) meter above ground level for field cycle exposure. Care was taken to minimize exposure of the TLDs during transport to and from the fiel d.

O.

2~2

Pressurized Ion Chambers were placed in the field for a test period beginning in September 1982. Difficulty was experienced in maintaining the operability of these'units for time periods exceeding a few weeks.

2.1.3 Terrestrial Soil Terrestrial soil samples of approximately 4 kg in weight were taken once a year. The soil samples were taken from an area of about one (1) square foot to a depth of one (1) inch. Vegetation and rocks were removed prior to sealing the containers for shipment to the analysis laboratory.

2.1.4 Garden Produce Vegetation samples, consisting of one sample each of a typical leafy vegetable, root crop and fruit, were collected depending on local harvest availability. 'fter removal of excess soil, tuberous crop samples were packaged and shipped for analysis.'.1.5 Mil k .

- Milk samples were collected semi-monthly during the summer months when pasture feeding would be a common practice and monthly during the remainder of the year. Prior to July 1983, samples were mixed with an ion exchange resin to extract and concentrate any iodine present prior to shipment. Beginning in July ,1983, the milk samples, were preserved with formalin solution and immediately shipped for analysis.

2.1. 6 Surface and Drinkin Water Monthly aliquots from composite (integrated grab) samples were

'taken at surface, drinking, and discharge water sample locations.

The composite sampling device was set to collect aliquots every forty-five (45) minutes. These aliquots.were alternately dispersed two large volume containers. One sample volume was acidified

'nto

, with concentrated acid, and a one (1') gallon sample was extracted for analysis. A tritium sample volume ( -250 ml), taken from the second non-acidified container, was shipped to the laboratory for composite and analysfs on a quarterly basis.

'.1.7 Well (Ground) Water quarterly grab samples were collected from on-site wells used to support construction activities and to provide site drinking water. Samples were collected after pumps had been activated for at least fifteen (15) minutes. The one (1) gallon samples were .

shipped, untreated, to the laboratory for analysis.

2~3

2.1.8 Shoreline Sediment Shoreline area sediment samples were collected twice a year.

Samples were scooped from just below the river's surface near the shoreline in areas of sediment deposition. Large rocks and foreign material were removed from the sample prior to packaging and shipping for analysis.

2.1. 9 Fish Fish samples were collected twice a year. Salmonoids were

'collected from the Ringold Fish Hatchery on the Columbia: River and the Lower Granite Dam on 4he Snake River. Other fish species were by electroshock technique. Fish were cleaned and 'ollected

\

filletted prior to freezing in preparation for shipping to the 2.2 laboratory for analysis.

Analytical Procedures and Calculational Models

]

2.2.1 Analytical Procedures 'for Radiochemical Analysis, NUS Laboratory Laboratory methods, used by NUS in its radioanalytical programs

~

were detailed in iridividual work instructions or procedures. The work instructions used in the Radiological Laboratory have 'been drawn from published analytical methods, including those of the Environmental Measurement Laboratory, DOE (formerly Health and Safety Laboratory of the U. S. Energy Research and Development Administration) and the laboratories of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, which were consistent with current regulatory

, positions for satisfying analytical performance standards. The current versions of these published manuals, copies of methods Og in the Regulatory Guides 'of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory'ublished Commission and other government or industry-approved analytical methods are at hand in the laboratory and were relied upon as the basis for laboratory protocol. All sample preparation and processing methods are covered by written work instructions.

Procedural methods have .been .summarized .in Table 2-6.0. '

2.2.1.1 Calculational Models Data analysis at NUS was performed on a DEC PDP 11/44 compute~

system. High resolution gamma"spectra were analyzed utilizing ". '.

Spectran F, the .calculation model developed by Canberra Indus-tries, Inc. for the analysis of Geli and HpGe spectra. The analysis'f NaI(T1) spectra was performed with Gamma M, a program also developed by Canberra Industries, Inc.

/

The programs used for the computation of results, errors and LLDs for non-spectrometric analyses were written inhouse and are docu-mented as required.

-e Activities, errors and LLDs are Sample Counts -

calculated as follows:

Background'ounts Activity = ime iquo ize ie iciency ecay actor Error(2S)=

2*SORT (Sam le Counts + Background Counts) ime" iquot Size ie iciency Decay actor 4.66*St}RT (Background Counts) ime i quo ize ie iciency ecay ac or NOTE: These'equations are expressed in terms of computer notation.

All results are reported in units of picoCuries per aliquot size.

Individual terms are defaulted to unity as appropriate. For the calculation of SR-89, the count rate of..SR-90 is subtracted after correction for differences. in counting efficiencies as well as Sr-90,and Sr-89 decay and Y-90 ingrowth. Table 2-7.0 summarizes the HUS analytical sensitivities.

2.2.2 Analytical Procedures for Radiochemical Analysis for Eberline Services Division p Prior'to July 1983, Eberline Service's, a division .of Thermo Nuclear

~e Corporation REMP.

was the analytical contractor for. the preoperational Sample analysis during the tenure of service by Eberline was dir'ected by procedural methods equal to, and in most cases, identi-cal with, those of the USDOE, Environmental Measurements Laboratory Procedures Manual (EML-300/HASL-300) or those of the U.S. Environ-mental Protection Agency. General procedural methodologies analytical sensitivities are discussed below. and'outine 2.2.2.1 Analytical Detection Limits and Count Rate Since the principle known uncertainty in environmental radiological analysis is sample count rate, the data reported by Eberline pre-sents an error term that was based on this uncert,'ainty factor.

This uncertainty was calculated by. standard methods and reported at the 95 percent confidence level (2 o ) if theresult was greater than the Lower Limit of Detection LLD; as defined in "Detection Capabilities for Environmental Sample Analy'sis", Table 3 of Regulatory Guide 4.8 and Table 2 of the Radiologi'cal Assessment Branch, HRC, Branch Technical Position, Rev. 1, 1979.

L'-5 Table 2-8.0 of this report reflects the:,current, LLD values specified by Plant Technical Specifications. Contractural changes i'n 1982

' required the vendor to report actual .calculated LLDs instead of the "Detection Capability" value reported'previously, The actual LLD was procedurally established as "that concentration which is 3

".e times the standard deviation error:.=-of the average concentration in a blank or background sample".

2.2.2.2 Air Particul ates'ross beta concentrations were measured with low background (gas flow proportional and/or Gieger) counting systems with anti-coincidence background suppression. The routine detection limit.

(LLD) was 0.002 pCi/m3 for gross beta or gross alpha based on a 0)-

minimum sample volume of 300 m3/week.

Gamma isotopic analyses were performed with germanium detectors with a routine lower detection limit of about 0.05 pCi/m3 for most gamma emitters for single filters and about 0.01 pCi/m3 for monthly composite samples.

2.2.2.3 Radioiodine The charcoal cartridges used were the TEDA-impregnated type.

Iodine was extracted from the ch'arcoal, chemically separated, and counted as AgI using wide beta or low beta counters which yield an

.LLD of 0.1 pCi/m3.

2.2.2.4 Drinkin, Surface and Ground Mater Gross beta analysis of water samples was performed by evaporation ',

~

of a measured aliquot'of the sample, acid digestion, planchetting ....

of the processed sample and radiometric assay by low-level beta -.

counting with an LLO of 0.5 pCi/1. Tritium analysis was performed on all water samples to the required LLD of 1000 pCi/1 by liquid scintillation counting. Gamma isotopic analysis was performed using germanium detectors with a routine LLD of 25 pCi/1 per gamma emitting radionuclide.

2.2.2.5 Soil or Sediment Samples were oven-dried and results reported based on dry weight.

Gamma emitters were measured with germanium detectors with an LLD as specified. The analysis. for Sr-89 and Sr-90 was. performe'd on ashed samples using a strontium chemical yield and.two-separation technique (EML Procedures Manual 1982, E-Sr-.01).

2.2.2.6" Ve etation/Garden Produce or Fish Measured amounts of these types of samples were analyzed for"gamma '-.:=

emitters by gamma spectrometry with counting times adjusted to pro- .

vide LLOs at least as sensitive as required for the appropriate sample type. Analysis for Sr-89 and Sr-90, if performed, was on ashed samples using a strontium chemical yield and two-separation technique.

2-6

2.2.2.7 Milk The determination of I-131 in fresh milk was based on anion exchange removal of the I-131, followed by radiochemical purifica-tion and low background beta counting. The LLD was 0.2 pCi/1 or better and the overall accuracy at 0.5 pCi/1 was + 25 percent or better at the 95-percent confidence level. Gamma emitters in milk were measured with germanium detectors. The analysis for Sr-89 and Sr-90, if performed, was on ashed samples using a strontium chemical yield and two-separation technique.

2.2.3 Ambient Radiation Dosimetrics

.2.2.3.1 Sup ly System Environmental TLDs The responsibility for ambient radiation dose measurements 'resided with the Radiological Programs Group, the Supply System's Support Services Directorate. The Radiological Programs Group has been .

providing this in-house service since January 1982. The field dosimeters are a Teledyne CaS04:Dy phosphor sandwiched between layers of teflon. The teflon-phosphor laminate (TLD card) is approximately 32 mm x 45 mm x 0.5 mm in size with eight (8) possi-ble readout areas per TLD card (4 primary and 4 backup readout areas). The TLD card is packaged for field use in black plastic inserted into a Teledyne (film-badge style) holder and further sealed and wrapped in aluminum foil, double bagged in plastic and placed in a cloth type pouch for field placement. Control and trip dosimeters are identically packaged and handled to assure. proper evaluation of field cycle exposure. Figures 5-3 and 5.4 provide additional information relative to TLD evaluation.

2.2.3.2 U.S. Testin 'Dosimetry Service 1

Prior to the development of the Supply System's ambient radiation dose measurement system, the TLD service was contracted to U.S.

Testing Co., Inc., Richland Division. The TLD material used by U.S. Testing was TLD-700. The: vai.iability in radiation sensitivity amongst the TLD chips was + 2%.at le . Each dosimeter'ar'd had four (4) TLD'hips enclosecf. Each chip in the dosimeter card was individually calibrated and processed for evaluation by an auto-matic computer controlled card reader. The TLD cards were sealed in teflon film and packaged for field distribution similar to the method used currently by the Supply System For-additional information relative to the handling and evaluation of the UST TLDs, refer to Figures 5-1 and 5-2.

2.2.3.3 Supply System Pressurized Ion Chambers Placement of three (3) pressurized ion chambers (PIC) was consis-tent with the requirements established by .the State of Washington Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council. The Supply System began operation of the PIC units in September of 1982 as indicated in Table 2-2.0, with field placement and monthly exchange of strip chart and cassette data tapes for review and evaluation. The strip charts were visually scanned against a predesignated scale, noting 2-7

any apparent anomalous readings. Data on the cassette tapes, how-ever, was never successfully processed and entered onto the Supply System's Prime computer. Continuous operation of the PIC units was not achieved due to the high mechanical failure rate and apparent high susceptibility to AC power supply transients. The PIC units were removed from the field and retained for use in situations requiring only short term monitoring.'.3 0 erational.Phase Nonroutine Re ortin Re uirements Table 2-9.0 identifies specific radionuclide concentrations for environ-mental sample media that fom the basis of a limiting condition for plant operation, as prescribed by Plant Technical Specifi ations. Consistent with these requirements, a nonroutine report will be issued to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Mashington State, Energy Evaluation; Council if the level of radioactivity, as the result of plant effluents in an envirormental sampli.ng medium at a specified loca-Facility'ite tion exceeds the reporting levels (Table 2-9.0) when averaged over any

,calendar quarter. When more than one of the radionuclides in Table 2-9.0 are detected in the sample media, the special report is issued if:

Concentration (1)

E ~ ~ PÃP1T Concentration (2) +

Mhen radionuclides (other than those in Table 2-9.0) or a gamma dose are determined to be the result of plant effluents, the report is issued the potential annual dose to a member of the public is equal to or greater if ~

than"the limits summarized in Table 2-10..0, as prese. ibed by Section .

3/4.11 of the Plant Technical Specifications.

A 'nonroutine report is not required if the measured level of radioactiv-ity is not the result of plant effluents.

I Special action levels such as noted in Table 2-11.0. were established as guidance to ensure that anomolous or unusual analytical result(s) initiate prompt evaluation. In general these action leveis were established at approximately 25 of the above required reporting 1evels for the operational program. Corrective actions taken subsequent to this initial evaluation should ensure that the Table 2-9.0 reporting ievels will not be exceeded as a result of routine plant. operation.

~ j',

2-.8

QQQQIVA P.QIQC.6 yhYIHA

>AZQI&fX Q.YDP)A JAlCA5S MOO'4 ~ouugAW QU Qgffgf:5LIA46 7< I LI

~ LKOCTO

~

RRRIARY IROIIWAY OC(HOARY NCIIWAY ORAYKL ROAO COVMZY LNC l2 PQOSSSR~~)~

~

~

Oj

"~]

El l

4 l~>>

[g

'J 03 7.

~

~

fj

'I c)i

)Ji.

I 1

P 0'

~

'I I I

0 Othello WASHINGTON I

I 38B Connell Lowor

<<ake River Granite Dam I IDAHO Priest Rapids Hanford Dam Resenralion I Lower Uttie Goose Monumental Dam Pomeroy WNP.2 Dam 9C Clarkston 4 Eureka Dayton Suntlyslde ~ 9A Benton City Nest ~

9B Ichhnd

~ Grandvlew Pasco 438A

~a Riye ~

37A, ~

ice Harbor Prosssr Kennewlck Dam Walla Walla .

McNary Dam 9A- TLD, AIR 8I SOIL OREGON 9B- VEGETABLE 9C- MILK CoILtmbta R 29- WATER 37A,B- VEGETABLE 38A,B. FISH

-N-1 Inch ~ 16 mlles I

0 a ts Figure 2-2 840440.5A Radlologlcal Environmental MonItortng Sample Locattons Outside of 40-Mlle RadIus (5/84)

C t

Oj g

I/I

~j

'I

'J 1

C J

l

4r.v t TABLE 2-1

0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL HOHITORIHG PROGRAM PLAN 12 Sampling and Type and Frequency>

~S ~ 1 T Sam le Location Code Collection Fre uenc of Anal sis

l. AIRBORNE

a. Particulates and 1, 4-9, 21, 23, 40, Continuous sampling Part culate: Gross radioiodine 48., and 57 Weekly collection eta , wge y; gamma (6/12) isotopic~ quar terly composite (by location)

b. Soi110 9, 1, 7, 21; and 23 Annually Gamma isotopic (0/5.)

2.. DIRECT RADIATION

a. TLD4 1-9, 10-25, 40-47,  ; quarterly, annually Gamma, quarterly data (34/56) 49-51, 53-56, 1S-16S review

b. PIcll , 1, 21, and 23 . Continuous recording, Gamma, monthly data (0/3) monthly tape exchange review

3. WATERBORNE

a. Surface/ 26', 27, 28 and 29 Composite aliquots Gamma isotopic ,

Drinking Water6 monthly Gross Beta; Tritium (3/4) quarterly composite

b. Ground Water 31, 32, and 52 quarterly G'amma isotopic and (2/3) tritium,, quarterly

c. Sediment from 33 and 34 Semiannually Gamma isotopic3 shoreline (1/2)

TABLE 2-1.0 (Contd.)

r Sampling and -

Type and Frequencyl

~sl T Sam le Location Code 1

- Collection Fre uency 1

of Analysis

4. INGESTION

a. Hilk7 9, 35, 36, and 40 Semimonthly .during Gamma i sotopic grazing season, Iodine-131 monthly at other times b Fish& 30, 3&, and 39 Seasonal: or Semiannually

c. Garden Produceg 37 and 9 Honthly during growing Gamaa isotopic season in the Riverview area of Pasco and a control near Grandview Sample locations are graphically depicted in Figures 2.0-1 and 2.0-2.

Deviations are permitted if samples are unobtainable due to hazardous conditions, seasonal availability, malfunction of automatic'ampling equipment, or other legitimate reasons. A11 devia-

'-, tions will be documented in the Annual Radiological Environmental Honitoring Report.

-. 2Particulate sample filters will be analyzed for qross beta after at least 24-hour decay. If gross beta activity is greater than 10 times the mean of the control sample, gamma isotopic analysis should be performed on the individual sample.

Gaoma isotopic means identification and quantification of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable. to the effluents of the facility.

TLD refers to thermoluminescent dosimeter. For purposes of WNP-2 REHP, a TLD is a phosphor card (32mm x 45mm x 0.5mm) with eight individual read-out areas .(four main dosimeter areas and four back-up dosimeter areas) in each badge case; TLDs used in REHP meet the requirements of Regulatory Guide 4.13 (ANSI N545-1975), except for specified energy-dependence response. Correction factors are available for energy ranges with response outside of the specified tolerances. TLD stations 1S-16S are special interest stations and are not included amongst the 34 routine TLD stations required by Plant Technical Specification, Table 3.12-1.

TABLE 2-1.0 (Contd;)

5Composite samples will be collected with equipment i~hich is capable of collecting an aliquot at time intervals which are short relative to the compositing period.

Station 26, MNP-2 makeup water intake from the Columba River, satisfies program require-ments for an upstream'urface water and drinking water control sample. Station 828, 300 Area sample satisfies the requirements for. downstream surface water and drinking water. Drinking water samples are not routinely analysed for I-131 from a two week composite. Two week composite sample analysis is initiated when the dose calculated for the consumption of water is greater than 1 mrem per year maximum organ dose using ODCH methodology and parameters.

7Hilk samples will be obtained from farms or individual milk animals which are located in sectors with high calculated annual average ground-level D/l}s. and high dose potential. Routine milk samples are collected in areas of high dose potential instead of ~ithin 5 km because of location of milk animals. - If Cesium-134 or Cesium-137 is measured in an individual milk sample in excess of 30 pCi/1, then Strontium-90 analysis should be performed.

There are no commercially important species in the Hanford reach of the Columbia River.

Host recreationally important species in the area are anadromous, primarily salmonoids. Four fish specimen will normally be collected by electroshock technique in the vicinity of the plant dis-.

charge (Station 30). If electroshocking produces insufficient fish samples, anadromous species may be obtained from a catch pond at-Ringold Fish Hatchery (Station 39).

Garden produce will routinely be obtained from farms or gardens using Columbia River water for irrigation. One sample of a root crop, leafy vegetable, and a fruit should be collected each sample period availability.

if available. The variety of the produce sample will be dependent on seasonal Soil samples are collected to satisfy the requirements of the Site Certification Agreement (SCA), WNP-2.

11Pressurized Ion-Chambers (PICs) are .instruments for measuring and recording dose rate con-tinuously. The three PICs are a part of a special two-phase, two-year monitoring program for the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council.

1 The number in parentheses for each sample'ype indicates the ratio of Radiological Environ-mental Technical= Specification (RETS) sample locations to total number of sample locations currently being monitored in the surveillance program.

TABLE 2-2.0 REMP SAMPLE IMPLEMENTATION

. Total Number

~S1 T of Locations Im 1ementation Status DIRECT RADIATION TLDs 3/78 Exclusion Area TLDs (multiple plant site) 32 3/82 4-5 mile radius 32 5/82 Relocate .Stations 21 'and 23 49 4/83 Restricted area WNP-2 "56 9/83 RETS committment PICs 3 9/82 1st field placement 9/82 2 units damaged by apparent lightning strike, repair status 11/82 2 units in fiel'd 12/82 1 unit in field 3/83 All units repair status 4/83 2 units in field 7/83 All units repair status 1/84 1 unit in field 2/84 2 units in field 3/84 All uhits repair status SOIL 5/78 1st samples 5/82 Two station locations moved AIR PARTICULATE 5 3/82 1st filters collected 6 8/82 Additional station(s) 9 9/82 Additional station( s) 10 1/83 Addi ti onal station( s) ll 2/83 Addi ti onal stati on( s )

12 11/83 Additional station(s)

AIR IODINE 10 1/83 1st charcoals collected 12 11/83 Additional station(s)

SURFACE/DRINKING WATER 2 4/82 Drinking 8 Discharge 3 5/82 Drinking 9/82 Drinking/Surface GROUND WATER 1/80 1st routine coll ection 3/82 Additional station(s)

SEDIMENT 5/78 1st collections FISH 4/78 1st collections 1st collections GARDEN PRODUCE MILK "

6/78 3/82 analysis I-131 analysis 0"

1/83 1 2-14

TABLE 2-3.0 1

REMP SAMPLE LOCATIONS BY SECTOR SECTOR1 STATION DI STANCE3 SAMPLE TYPE2 MILES METERS N (1) 52 ~ 0.10 161. GW 1-S 0.30 483. TLD 47 0. 50 805. TLD 57 0.75 1201. AP/AI 18 1.10. 1770. TLD 53 7. 50 12068. TLD (2) 2-S 0.40 644. TLD 2 1.80 2896. TLD 54 6.50 10459. TLD NE (3) 3-S 0;50 805. TLD 19 1. 80 2896. TLD

~

48 4. 30 6919. AP/AI 46 , 4.70 7562. TLD ENE (4) -- '4-S 0.40 644. TLD 21 1. 50 2414. AP/AI/SO/

TLD/P IC 20 1.90 3057. TLD ll 3.10 4988. TLD

4. 20 6758. TLD 44 5. 70 9171. TLD 35 10. 50 16895. MI 33 3. 60 5792. SE 2-15

TABLE 2-3.0 (Cont'd)

REMP SAMPLE LOCATIONS BY SECTOR SECTOR1 STATION DISTAHCE3 SAMPLE TYPE2 MILES METERS E (5) 5-S 0.40 644. TLD 31 1770. GM 32 1.2 1931. GM 22 2.10 3379. TLD 10 3.10 4988. TLO 26 3;20 5149. PM

27. 3. 20 5149. DM 43 5. 70 9171. TLD 30 3.30 5311. FI 38 26.50 42649. FI ESE (6) 6-S 0. 40 644. TLD 51 2.10 3379. TLD 23 3. 00 4827. AP/AI/SO/

TLD/PIC 8 4. 70 ,7562. AP/AI/TLD 42 5. 60 9010. TLO 36 7. 20 11585. MI 5 7. 70 12389. AP/AI/TLD 34 3. 50 5632 SE SE .-

(7) 7-S 0. 50 805. TLD 24 1.90 3057. TLO 3 2.00 3218. TLD 41 5. 80 9332. TLD 40 .

6.40 10298. AP/A I/MI/TLD

,2-16

TABLE 2-3.0 (Cont'd)

REMP SAMPLE LOCATIONS BY SECTOR SECTORl STATION DISTANCE> SAMPLE TYPE2 MILES METERS t

SSE (8) 8-S 0.70 1126. TLD

'LD 25 2574.

1.60'.00 55 11263. TLD 28 7.40 11907. PW 9.30 14964. AI/AP/TLD a

29 11.00 17699. PW

' v.w 37 16.00 25744. GP S (9) 9-S 0. 70 1126. ,TLD 1.30 2092. AP/AI/SO/

TLD/P IC

~~

6 7.70 12389. AP/AI/TLD SSW (10) 56'.80 10-S

1. 20

7. 00 1287.

1931. 'LD.

11263...

TLD TLD SSW (11) ~ 11-S 0. 74 1126. TLD 13 1.40 2253. TLD WSW (12) 12-S 0. 50 805. TLD 14 1.40 2253. TLD .

94 30.00 48270. AP/AI/MI/GP/

TLD/SO (13) 13-S 0. 50 805. TLD 15 1.40 2253. TLD WNW (14) 14-S 0. 50 805. TLD 16 l. 40 2253. TLD

2. 70 4344. AP/AI/SO/TLD 2-17

P TABLE 2-3.0 (Cont'd)

REMP SAf,lPLE LOCATIONS BY SECTOR SECTOR" STATION DISTANCE3 SAMPLE TYPE2 MILES METERS NM (15) 15-M 0. 50 805. TLD 49 1. 20 1931. TLD 5NW. (16) 16-S 0.40 644. TLD 17 1. 20 1931. TLD 12 6.10 '981 5. TLD 1 The area in the vicinity of the WNP-2 plant is separated into 16 separate sectors for reporting purposes. The 16 sectors cover 360 degrees in equal 22.5 degree sections, beginning with Sector 1 (H) at 348.75 to 11.25 degrees continuing clockwise through Sector 16 (HNM).

~ ~

2 Sample 'Type Key: TLD - Thermol'uminescent HI - Milk Dosimeter AP '- Air Particulate PM - Potable Mater (drinking/surface)

AI - Air Iodine GM - Ground Mater SO - Soil DW - Discharge Water SE - Sediment GP - Garden Produce FI - Fish PIC - Pressurized Ion Chamber 3 Distances are estimated from map positions for each location as a radial distance from WNP-2 containment.

4 The Station R designation is for the Sunnyside-Grandview Control Area and is actually 3 separate locations within a few miles of'ach other (5-A for TLD/AI/AP/SO, 5-B for GP, and 5-C for MI) all within 30-35 miles of WNP-2.,

2-18

TABL'E 2-4.0 1983 LAND USE CEHSVS WITHIN FIYE (5) RADIAL MILES OF WNP-2 a'~

t. Class of Observation Direction* ~Mi 1 Numbers Dairy Animals

1) Cows

2) Goats Meat Animals

1) Beef 4;0 75 4.5 2

~

4 7 2

2) Sheep

3) Other 4.5 12 (Poultry, 'E other)

Yegetable Gardens (250 m2) 4.4 1 ENE 4.0 4 ENE 4,5 2 E 4.5 1 4.8 '1 ESE 4.5'.7 1 ESE 2 ESE .4. 8 1 Direction for each location is identified according to meterological sectors (16 different, 22.5 degree compass sections with due north bisecting the 1st 22.5 degree sector, 348.75 to 11.35 degrees).

Distances are in miles, radial distance from WNP-2 containment as estimated from map positions for each location.

2-19

TA8LE 2 5;0 DISTANCES FROM WNP-2* TO NEAREST POINTS OF INTEREST WITHIN 10 MILE RADIUS N NHE NE EHE E ESE SE SSE S . SSW SW Resident 7.6 6.0 4.4 4.0 4.3 , 4.2 4.8 7,5 9.5 7.5 Garden 7.9 7.9 4.4 4.0 4,5 4.5 5.4 7.5 9.6 7.5 Cow(s)~ 9.4 7.9 6.4 7.0 4.8 7.3 6.0 10.0 Goat(s) 94 54 Dairy 7 3 9~77 Livestock 9.2, 9.0 6.0 4.0 4.5 7.3 5.0 8:0 9.8 8.1 9.0 (beef, sheep)

• DISTANCES ARE IN MILES, RADIAL DISTANCE FROM WNP-2 COHTAIHMEHT AS ESTIMATED FROM MAP POSITIONS FOR EACH LOCATION.

1983 Survey Information The one (1) cow in the E sector at 4.8 miles is not to be a continuous milker, therefore not a viable sampling location at this time.

TABLE 2-6.0 ANALYTICAL METHODS NUS RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY PROCEDURE'MANUAL SAMPLE TYPE AND ANALYSIS ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES Airborne - Particulates (AP)

Gross Alpha P0,5.2.15. 51 Gas proportional counting in planchet Gross Beta P0.5.2.15.51 Gas proportional counting in planchet Ge(ii) gambia isotopic P0.5.2.15.51 Compress to standard volume and GeLi count Airborne Iodine (C)

Iodine-131 PO.5.2.15. 52 NaI (Tl) spectra Milk (H)-Nearest Producers Iodine-131 (Low Level) P0.5.2.15.40 'on exchange; and mount counting for liquid-liquid extraction beta-gamma coincidence Strontium-89 P0.5.2.15.31; 33; 37; 38 TCA separation; nitrate reprecipitations; yttrium milkings; proportional counting Strontium-90 P0.5.2.15.31; 33; 37; 38 TCA separation; nitrate reprecipitations; yttrium milkings; proportional counting Ge(Li) gamma isotopic P0.5.2.15.60; 61 GeLi count of standard geometry

a TABLE 2-6.0 (Continued)

PROCEDURE MANUAL SAMPLE TYPE AND ANALYSIS REFERENCE ANALYTICAL.PROCEDURES River Mater (MR)

~Sus ended - Gross Alpha PO.5.2.15.10 - Filtration and evaporati on, transfer to stainless steel planchet, proportional counting

~Sus ended Gross Beta P0.5.2.15.10 Dissolved - Gross Alpha PO. 5,2.15.10 Dissolved - Gross Beta PO. 5.2.15.10 Strontium-89 P0.5.2.15.32; 33; 37; 3& Carbonate precipitation, nitrate repre-cipitatons and yttrium milkings, propor-tional counting of st'rontium carbonate and yttrium oxalate Strontium-90 P0.5.2.15.32; 33; 37; 38 'i Tritium (H3) PO.5.2.15. 23 still ation and liquid scintill ation counting Ge(Li) gamma isotopic P0.5.2.15.60; 61 GeLi count of standard geometry Ye etation-Feed and Fora e-Nearest ro ucers

'sh, Strontium-89 36;37;38

'0.5.2.15.30;35 acid. dissolution, nitrate reprecipi-tations and yttrium milkings, propor-tional counting of strontium carbonate and 'yttrium oxalate N

Strontium-90 P0.5.2.15.30;35;36;37;38 Ge(Li) gaama isotopic P0.5.2.15.30; 60 Dry, mount in standard geometry and GeLi count

F.

P TABLE 2-6.0 (Continued)

PROCEDURE MANUAL SAMPLE TYPE AND ANALYSIS REFER ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES A uatic Biota-Ve etation (VA)

Gross Beta P0.5.2.15.30; 15 Dry; ash, mount with stainless steel planchet,and count in proportional: counter Strontium-89 P0.5.2.15.30;35;36;37;38 Dry, ash, acid dissolution, nitrate reprecipitations, yttrium milkings, count strontium carbonate and yttrium oxalate in proportional counter Strontium-90 P0.5.2.15.30;35;36;37;38 Ge(Li) gamma isotopic P0.5.2.15.30; 60 Dry, mount in standard geometry and GeLi count Vegetation-Food and Feed Cro s (FF)

Gross Beta P0..5.2.15.30; 15 Dry, ash, mount in stainless steel planchet and count on gas proportional counter Strontium-89 P0.5.2.15.30;35;36;37;38 Dry, ash, acid dissolution, nitrate reprecipitations, yttrium mi lkings, gas counting of strontium 'roportional carbonate and:yttrium oxalate Strontium-90 PO.5.2.15. 30; 35; 36; 37; 38 Ge(Li) gambia isotopic P0.5.2.15.30; 60 Dry, mount in'tandard geometry and GeLi count

TABLE 2-6.0 (Continued)

PROCEDURE MANUAL SAMPLE TYPE AHD AHALYSIS ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES Ve etation-Garden Cro s (FG)

Gross Beta P0.5.2.15.3-; 15 Dry, ash, mount in stainless steel planchet and count on gas proportional counter-Strontium-89 P0.5.2.15.30;35;36;37;38 Dry, ash, acid dissolution, nitrate reprecipitations, yttrium milkings, gas proportional counting of strontium carbonate and yttrium oxalate 4

S,trontium-90 PO.5.2.15. 30; 35; 36; 37; 38 Ge(Li) galena isotopic P0.5.2.15.30; 60 'Dry, mount in standard geometry and GeLi count Back round Radiation.(TLD)

Gamma Exposure (Het)-mR P0.5.2.15.49 Teledyne RGD-2, Calcium sulfate (Dy) dosimeters Ground water (MG)

Gross Alpha P0.5.2.15.10 Evaporation, transfer to stainless steel

.planchet, dry and.count. with gas propor-tional counter Gross Beta P0.5.2.15.10 Ge(Li) gonna isotopic P0.5.2.15.60; 61 GeLi count of standard geometry Tritium (H3) P0.5.2.15.60; 61

p-- i TABLE 2-6.0 (Continued)

PROCEDURE N)JUAL SN4PLE TYPE AND ANALYSIS ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES A uatic Biota-Fish (FI)

Gross Beta P0.5.2.15:30; 15 Dry, ash mount with stainless steel planchet and count in proportional counter Strontium-89 P0.5.2.15.30;35;36;37;38 Dry, ash, acid dissolution, nitrate reprecipitations yttrium milkings, count strontium carbonate and yttrium oxal ate in proportional counter

- Strontium-90 P0.5.2.15.30;35;36;37;38 Ge(Li) gambia isotopic. P0.5.2.15.'30; 60 Dry, mount in standard geometry and GeLi count

TABLE 2-7.0 NUS Analytical Detecgion Limits

. Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP)

," ","."'.-.:."..* . " (Page 1 of 2) ~ ~

Analysis Media 'Re ulled Sensitivity Airborne Gross Beta (1) . .Ol pCi/m3 Particulate Gamma Spectrometry (2) (3)

'4)

Airborne Iodine I-131 .07 pCi/m3 Soil Gamma Spectrometry Sr-.90 (4) 150 pCi/Kg (dry)

River Water Gamma Spectrometry (3)

Tritium 500 pCj/1 Drinking Water Gamma Spectrometry (3)

Gross Beta 4 pCi/1 Tritium 500 pCi/1 Sr-90 (5) 2 pCi/1 Ground Water Gamma Spectrometry (3)

Tritium 500 pCi/1 Sediment Gamma Spectrometry (3)

Fish Gamma Spectrometry . (3)

Fruits and Vegetables Gamma Spectrometry (3)

Milk Garana Spectrometr y (3)

I-131 1 pci/1 "

h 4 1 c ~ \;~

TABLE 2-7.0 (Continued)

(1) If the gross beta activity is greater than.ten.(10) times the yearly mean of the control sample, gamma analysis should he performed on the. individual. sample.

(2) Gambia Spectrometry means the identification and quantification of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to the effluents from the facility.

(3) Detection limits for garaaa spectrometry meet or exceed those required for gambia emitting isotopes in Table 2.8-0, except that the sensitivities for I-131 in milk and water are assumed to be by radiochemical methods.

(4) Individual soil samples will be analyzed for Sr-90 if the gamma results for the sample are greater than ten (10) times the mean of the control.

'(5) If the gross beta activity in the water is greater than ten (10) times the mean of the previous three months activity level for. the specific location or greater 8 pCi/1 for an individual location, Sr-90 will be performed.

TABLE 2-8.0 DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS

.LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD)

WATER AIRBORNE PARTICULATE FISH MI LK FOOD PRODUCTS SEDIMENT ANALYSIS ( Ci/L) OR GASES ( Ci/m ) ( Ci/k wet) Ci/L) ( Ci/k, wet) ( Ci/kg, dry)

Gross beta 4 1 x10 H-3 2000*

Mn-54 15 130 Fe-59 30 260 Co-58, 60 15 130 Zn-65

'60 30 Zr-95 30 Nb-95 15, I-131 7x10 60 Cs-134 15 5 x.10 130 -15 60 150 Cs-137 18 6.x '.10 150 18 80 180 Ba-140 60 60 0 J La-1 40 15 15

• If no drinking water pathway exists, a valve of 3,000. pCi/L may be used.

This table is the current LLD, REMP analytical values presented by the WNP-2 Plant Technical Speci ficati ons.

'ABLE 2-9.0 REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS, IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES(2)

MATER AIRBORNE PARTICULATE FISH MILK FOOD PRODUCTS ',

ANALYSIS ( Ci/L) OR GASES ( Ci/M ) ( Ci/kg, wet) ( Ci/L) ( Ci/k , wet)

H 3(1) .

2 x 104 Mn-54 x 103 '3 1 x 104 Fe-59 4 x 102 1 x104 Co-58 1 x 103 3 x 104 Co-60 3x10 ~

1 x 104 Zn-65 3 x 102 2 x 104 Zr-Nb-95 4 X 102 I-131 2 0.9 3 1 x102 Cs-134 30 10 1 x 103 60 1 x 103 Cs-137 20 2 x.103 70 2 x 103 Ba-La-140 2x10 3 x 102 (1) For drinking water'samples. The value given is the 40 pathway exists, a value of 30,000 pCi/L is used.

CFR Part 141 value, If no drinking water J

(2) For radionuclides other than those listed aboVe or for a'detected'amma dose greater than the control results or due to plant effluents, the reporting levels are presented according to annual Dose/Dose Committment. A summarized listing of these values is presented in Table 2-10.

TABLE 2-10.0 DOSE/DOSE COMMITMENT LIMITING CONDITIONS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS DOSE OR DOSE COMMITMENT*

Type of Effluent 'Calendar ()uarter Calendar Year Liquid to 1.5 mrem (total body) 3 mrem (total body)

Unrestricted Area 5.0 mrem (any organ) 10 mrem (any organ)

'..'atNobleSiteGases Boundry 5 mrads gamma 10 mrads beta 10 mrads gamma 20 mrads beta j-131, 'I-133, H-3, 7.5 mrems (any organ) 15 mrem (any organ) 5 Radi'onuclide Particulate

• The dose/dose commitments sunmarized in this Table are detailed in Section 3/4.11 Radioactive Effluents, WNP-2 Plant Technical Specifications (TS).

Calculations for determining dose or dose commitment are based on methodologies and parameters

"" " of the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual per TS requirements." ',.

t

'I I'

2-30

TABLE'-.11.0 NUS Analytical Action Levels*

Media ~Anal els Levels

..... Fish Cs-137 and -134 500 pCi/Kg (wet)

K-40 1200 pCi/Kg (wet)

Others 2500 pCi/Kg (wet)

Sediment Cs-137 and -134 1000 pCi/Kg (dry)

K-40 NONE Others 2500 pCi/Kg (dry)

Mater - H-3, Any positive value Any Any Indicator = 10X Control or Control = 10X Indicator Any I-131 Any positive value "Any confirmed result exceeding an indicated level requires prompt (within 2 days) notification by the laboratory. A positive value is one that is above the indicated tlDL.

H

~ ~

E

']

I I

C' 8

\

F J ~

]

J t

I '"l I

P ~ .3 J

E' 3.0 SUllMARY AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

\

Radiological analyses of environmental media characteristically approached and frequently fell below the detection capabilities of state-of-the-art measurement methods.(l) In this situation the analytical result is typically reported as a less than detectable (less than, LLD, LT, < )

va',ue and not as a numerical result or actual net concentration (negative, positive or measured zero). Truncated or censored data sets occur when LLD values are reported instead of net concentrations. Data sets with more than 505 of the values reported as LLD values cannot readily be evaluated by standard statistical methods.. The common practice is to simply compute the mean and standard deviation using the LLD value and reporting the results as biased estimates.(2).

I The preponderance of the MNP-. 2 preoperational phase results are LLD values. Therefore, the statistical summaries are biased estimates of. +he data sets as represented by a < mean value.

Tables 3-1.0 through 3-1.7 provide overall statistical summaries of the preoperational data. Each table represents .a specific environmental media (i.e., air, wate'r, soil, sediment, fish, garden produce, milk and ambient radiation). For each radionuclide reported for the specified media, a mean value and range of report values is tabulated. These values represent all results from all monitoring stations for all years, with the exception of the results for ambient radiation. During the early years of ambient radiation monitoring (1978-1982), problems occurred with the TLD methodology, resulting in large variability within the data set. Therefore, only the 1982 and 1983 TLD data has been statistically evaluated and reported in the summary tables. There is no summary information presented for the PIC monitoring systems because of the discontinuity of the field data collected as a result of the frequent system malfunctions.

Tables 3-2.0 through 3-2.8 summarize the preoperational data by year.

actual. data from the preoperational monitoring program are tabulated

'he in Section 4.0, Tables 4-1.0 through 4-8.1.

results of the gross beta* and gamma spectrometry analyses on air The particulate filters, 0.03 pCi/m3 (mean), were consistent with levels reported for the Hanford en'virons (3, 4, 13, 14). Figures the.'eneral 3-1 and 3-2 represent the preoperational gross beta results by plotting the mean, high and low values from all stations are plotted for each collection period.'= The apparently high values during the winter of 1982 were primarily due to meterological conditions causing elevated levels of natural radiation .being collected on the air particulate filters.

Airborne iodine-131 analyses of charcoal cartridges were all LLD values.

S '

3-1

Gross beta* activity in water samples was also LLD values. The tritium

(- 470 pCi/L (mean)) in the water samples was essentially due to Hanford ~1 Site operations. A tritium plume beneath the WNP-2 site was the result of previous Hanford Separations Area processes.(15-20) The highest tritium activities (2600 and 1400 pCi/L) reported were in 1983 from Stations 31 and 32, wells located at MNP-1 construction site. These v'alues were below the Washington State water quality standards.

Concentrations of cesium-137 and the naturally occurring radionuclides present in preoperational phase soil samples can be compared to values reported for the Hanford environs.(1.3"14~ < 23) The cesium-137 levels

,reported were in part due to global fallout and its presence in soil

~

samples was neither unexpected nor unusual.

Cobalt-60 and cesium-137 were detected in Columbia River sediment samples.

The presence of some cesium-137 was expected due to global fallout. The le'vels of cobalt-60 ( - 255 pCi/kg (mean)) and cesium-137 ( 287 pCi/kg (mean)) were consistent with levels indicated for Columbia River sediments as a result of past Hanford operations.(22-24)

Naturally occurring potassium-40~ was the major detectable activity reported in milk samples. Except for cesium-137.,"all other gamma emitting nuclides reported were at or below the established lower limit of detec-tion. Because of the presence of global .fallout, .cesium-137 is frequently observed in milk samples at the levels measured and compares with reported activities from Hanford surveillance.(3-14 < 26). Milk samples were also analyzed for iodine-131 during the, last year of the preoperational phase.

No detectable iodine activity was recorded.

• Total or "gross" activity measurements have been widely used for many years in making environmental radioactivity measurements because of their ease, speed and low cost compared to analyses'or s'pecific radionuclides. Caution must be taken when attempting to interpret the meaning of the results obtained from gross activity measurement. No information on the identity of radionuclides is obtained and the reported calculated activity refers only to an equivalent concentration of the selected standard calibration lack of radionuclide information makes it impossible to draw a mean-nuclide'hough concerning dose, the use of gross activity measurements is ingful conclusion beneficial for surveying general radioactivity levels (if it is recognized that the activity reported may either over- or under-estimate specific nuclide activity).

p

~The. majority of the naturally occurring radioactivity found on earth are natural, terrestrial sources. Virtually everything in the world contains trace quantities of radioactivity of terrestrial origin. At least twenty-two naturally occurring single or non-series primordial (ie., of sufficiently long half-life to have survived in detectable quantities since the formation of the earth) radionuclides are known. Potassium-40 is one of these primordial radionuclides and quite possibly the most important. Since potassium is essential to life, potassium-40 is found in all living and formerly living things. It is present to some degree in essentially all environmental media, which makes it an excellent point of reference for the analytical process(25).

~ .

3-2

Potassium-40~ was the major detectable activity in the edible portion of fish samples. All other results from the gamma spectrometric analysis of these fish samples were at or below the applicable detection limit.

Naturally occurring potassium-40 was the only activity reported above the applicable detection limits for all produce samples analyzed.

Environmental radiation dose rates were detemined by thermoluminescent dosimeters. The mean values for both the annual and quarterly sets of TLD for the 1982. and 1983 monitoring period were 0.24 mR/day. The quarterly TLD mean values are depicted in Figure 3-3.

Additional evaluation of the 1982-83 TLD data set indicates that there was probably not a significant seasonal effect demonstrated by the results. There was some significant station to station differences, due to spatial and temporal influences in background radioactivity. Figures 3-4 and 3-5 display the results of the Duncan's multiple range test for evaluation of the difference between means for 1982 and 1983 TLD data.

From the results of the Duncan statistic, it is obvious that station 46 from other stations.

is significantly different at the 0.050 level Station 8 data indicates that there is difference between it and many of the other stations.

SUtNARY TA8LE NOTES The following information is pertinent to the interpretation of the summary data in the following summary tables.

Definitions and Abbrevi ati ons:

Indicator Station(s) - Includes all sample stations for the given sample type, except t ose station(s) designated as control stations.

Control Station(s) - Sample stations designated as controls due to their location, distance and/or area of minimal plant influence. The control station for TLDs, milk, air particulate, air iodine, soil, and garden produce is sample location P9. The control station for drinking/surface water is sample location 826. The control station for fish is sample location 838.

Yr. - Year of sample collection appropriate for the given analysis.

Isoto e - The following list of codes was assigned to specific analyses o iaci itate computer evaluation via available processor programs, such as SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences).

3-3

9 BOO Gross. Beta - Air AOT Gross Alpha BTG:. .... Gross Beta - Ground >later BTD Gross Beta - Drinking/Surface Mater C34 C37,...

Z95 Cesium

.Cesium Zirconium 134 137

- 95

)

N95 Niobium -,95 C44 ." Cerium - 144 I31 Iodine - 131 B07 Beryllium - 7 M54 Manganese - 54 I59 Iron - 59 C58 Cobalt - 58 C60 Cobalt - 60

. Z65 Zinc - 65 K40 Potassium -. 40 S90 Strontium - 90 S89 Strontium - 89 B12 Bismuth - 212.

B14 Bismuth - 214 L12 Lead - 212 .

L14 Lead - 214

. R26 Radium - 226 A28 Actinium - 228 T08 Thai.lium - 208 H03 Tritium (Hydrogen - 3)

B40 Barium - 140 L40 Lanthanum - 140 Type - Indicates S1.3 Tin - 113 whether or not the result for'an analysis For a specific 03

~iso ope was LLD or Positive; Size - Provides information as to the number of analyses for an isotope by type.

Mean - Mean value for the results for the indicated isotope and type.

Wax/Nn - Maximum and minimum provide the range of ana1ytical values reported for each analysis by isotope and type.

Max Station - For isotopes with positive values the sample station with o d i 1 I td if>d.

GROSS BETA N A R 1982

.10

~ 09

.oa

.07

~(g +0 S CJ

.05 CD Q .04 CL

~ 05

+02

~ 01 0

26 WEEK High/Low/Average Figure 3-1

Y l g

gt 3

FJi g

Q P

I C:,l I

I]

3 1

t

'Y

~ -

I

~ "l

~ 10

~ OQ

.08

~ 07

~ OS

.05 C3

<<04 A

.03

~ 02

<<01 26 39 WEEK High/Low/Average Figure 3-2

k j

r I'

3

~ ~

J J

j 3

~ ]

)

Q UARTE R LY TLDa 1 982 i 983 High Mean Low 4

QUARTER 1S82 1983 Graph depicts both -indicator and control stations Fiqure. 3-3

'l

/J

'3

~

~

t I

'3 J

't

'l

l 0

4'

IGURE 3-4 Results of the Duncan Multiple Range est indicating significant differences between mean da a collected for all stations during 3982 STATION MEAN STATION. 94021 6 34451 10 445 5 220 7 1 1311 1920221891 434224161214172541 81546

.2096 9

.2127 40

.2225 21

.2233 6

.2260 3

.2263 44

.2266 51

~ 2267 10

.2269 4

.2285 45

.2289 5

.2310 2

.2343 20 4 ~

.2356 7

.2372 1

.2372 13

.2372 11

.2374 19

.2375 23

.2407 22

.2409 18 e ~

.2413 91

~ ~

.2415 43

,2432 42

~ ~

.2463 24 0 ~

.2473 16

.2479 12 ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

.2483 14 * ~ ~ i ~ 1 ~

.2517 17 t 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ 1 ~ 1 1

.2544 25 ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1

.2572 41

.2581 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ t s ~ ~ ~ ~

'2606 15 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ t a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 1

.2896 46 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ 1 ~ a ~ a ~ ~ ~ a e ~ o e t ~ a a ~ ~ s =

a s ~

(') Denotes pairs of groups sfgnlffoantly different at the 0.050 lovel AR1ARo

FIGURE 3-5 Results of the Duncan Multiple Range Test indicating'significant differences between mean data collected for all TLD stations during 1983 STATION MEAN STATION 4 47 6 50 40 3 55 9 5 21 51 10 11 7 2 45 13 44 23 56 14 24 49'0 16 18 19 22 1 15 17 42 25 12 41 54 8 43 53 48

.2161 4

.2177 47

.2219 6

.2223 50

.2227 40

.2234 3

.2256 55

.2264 9

.2265 5

.2296 21

.2335 51

.2346 10

.2347 11 ~ ~

.2358 7 ~ ~

.2364 2 0 ~

.2370 45

.2372 13 ~ ~

.2373 44

.2376 23

.2379 56

.2383 14 ~ 0

.2390 24

.2391 49

.2399 20 ~ ~

.2407 16 ~ 4 ~

.2426 18 0 0 ~

.2433 19 ~ ~ a

.2435 22 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~

.2445 1 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~

.2475 15 ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~

.2482 17 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

.2484 42 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~

.2535 25 1 ~ 4 ~ P 0 ~ 4 ~ 4 ~ 4 ~

.2546 ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 12 4 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '

.2595 41 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~

.2602 0 ~

54 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

.2626 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0

.2644 43 ~ ~ ~ t ~ 0 1 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a o ~ 0

.2730 53 ~ ~ ~: ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0

.2843 46 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ o s ~ o a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ a a a ~

(') Denotes pairs ol groups signi%cantly different at the 0.050 level 851062 0,

~

TABLE 3-1.0 SNMARY AIR SNPLE DATA

.ALL STATIONS/ALL"YEARS ...

Ci/m Analysis'OO Mean Maximum Minimum

0. 03 0.13 ..,'0 01 B07 0. 07 0. 09 '. 0.04 C34 0. 01 0. 04 ~ .,'0.0014 C37 0. 01 0. 04 0. 0013 C44 0.07 0. 04 0 09 I31 0. 05 0.11 0.01 N95 0. 002 004 0. 0018 Z95 ~ 0.005 0. 006 0.004 TABLE 3-1.1 SNMARY MATER SNPLE DATA ALL STATIONS/ALL YEARS pCi/m Analysis Mean Maximum Minimum B40 50.46 300.00 4. 00.

'TD 2.91 6.00 1.90 BTG 10.50 22. 00 1.90 C34 3. 77 12. 00 1.00 C37 7.79 12. 00 1.00 C58 4.76 25.00 1.00 C60 4.55. 13. 00 0.11 H03 433. 33 800.00 80.00 H3G 467.81 2600.00 90.00 I 31 0. 31 0. 37 0. 27 I59 ~

12.09 93. 00 2.00 L40 25. 46 160. 00 3. 00 M54 4.19 16. 00 1.00 N95 5.05 29.00 1.50 Z65 8. 04 27. 00 1.38 Z95 10. 59 63. 00 2. 00 3-10"

TABLE 3-1.2

SUMMARY

SEDIMENT SAMPLE DATA ALL STATIONS/ALL YEARS pC$ /m Anal ysis Mean llaximum llinimum A28 635.00 830.00 440.00 B14 570.00 880.00 350. 00 C34 117.00 150.00 50.00 C37 286.95 560.00 50.00 .

K40 15535.29 24000.00 10000.00 L12 565.00 710. 00 470. 00 L14 582. 00 520. 00 470. 00 R26 575.00 860.00 420. 00 T08 725.00 800.00 630.00 C60 254.60 610. 00 150.00 TABLE 3-1.3

SUMMARY

SOIL SAMPLE DATA ALL STATIONS/ALL YEARS pCi/m

~Anal sis .Mean Maxinmm Minimum C37 380. 28 1880. 00 20. 00 C34 65. 33 150.00 20. 00 C58 150. 00 150.00 150.00 C60 150.00 150.00 150.00 I59 260.00 260.00 260.00 K40 13750. 00 21000. 00 7000.00 M54 150.00 150.00 150.00 N95 150.00 150. 00 150.00 Z65 150.00 150. 00 150.00 Z95 150.00 150.00 .'50.00 A28 735.00 840.00 580.00 B12 720. 00 720.00 720. 00 B14 557.60 780.00 420. 00 L12 296.00 400. 00 160. 00 L14 658.00 780.00 470.00 R26 608.00 760.00 460. 00 T08 702.50 850.00 500.00 3-11

TABLE 3-1.4 SNMARY MILK SAMPLE DATA ALL STATIONS/ALL YEARS pC i/m Analysis Mean Maximum Minimum B40 105. 50 2000.00 14. 00 C34 3. 55 14. 00 0. 90 C37 3. 23 12.00 0. 02 L40 33. 95 '000.00 5.00 I31 '.51 1. 00 0.09

.K40 1318.75 1700. 00 1100. 00 TABLE 3-1.5 SNMARY FISH SAMPLE DATA ALL STATIONS/ALL YEARS

~ 3

. pCi/m

~Anal sis Mean Maximum Minimum C34 67.14 130. 00 6. 00 C37 88.84 130. 00 10. 00 C58 87.67 130,. 00 9.00 C60 80. 56 130. 00 9.00 I59 135.15 260. 00 30.00 K40 3306.67 4200. 00 2800.00 M54 ~

86.33 -" 130. 00 8.00 N95 130. 00 130. 00 130. 00 Z65 131 .90 '.,'. 260.00 20.00 Z95 130.00 ,130. 00 130. 00 3-12

TABLE 3-1.6 SNMARY PRODUCE SAMPLE DATA ALL STATIONS/ALL YEARS pC i/m

~Ana1 sis Mean Maximum Minimum C34 49.12 140.00 10. 00 ~s

'r 69.75

~

C37 00 10. 00

'40.

C58 80.45 130. 00 80.00 C60 ~ 80. 45 130,00 ~

80.00 K40 3492. 54 10000.00 2000.00 M54 80. 47 . 130. 00 80.00 N95 80.45 130.00 80.00 Z65 80.53 130. 00 80.00 Z95 80.45 130.00 80.00 I31 105.61 1000. 00 10. 00 TABLE 3-1.7

'NMARY TLD DATA ALL STATIONS/ALL YEARS QUARTERLY.

mR/Day Analysis Mean Maximum+ Minismm*

TL ~

-... 0. 24 Da 32- ~ ':

0. 71".' '.

ANNUALLnY"-"

mR/Day Analysis Mean Maxi aam* Mini num*

TL 0. 24 0. 31 0. 20

• Values from individual TL card readings.

3-13

TABLE 3-2.0 AIR DATA SuMMARY RY YEAR IHDICATOR STAT IOHS SAMPLE MAX YR ISOTOPE TYPE SIZE MAX MIN STAT IGH 1982 BOO LLD 20 < Oo0100 . < 0.0100 < Oi0100 1982 BOO POSITIVE 218 Oe0335 '<1300 Oo0100 5 1982 C34 LLD 20 ~

,< Oo0170 < Oi0400 < 0>0100 1982 C37 LLD 20 , < 0.0170 Oo0400 . < 0.0100 COHTROL STATIONS .

YR ISOTOPE TYPE.

SAMPLE SIZE MAX'IH

~ ~ W 0 WW ~ OW 1982 BOO LLD 3 . < Oe0100 < Oo0100 < 0.0100 1982 BOO POSITIVE 38 .0.0242 Oe0700 0.01CO l982 C34 LLD 3 < Oo0133 < Oo0200 < Oo0100

~ t 1932 C37 'LD 3 < 0.0133 < Oe0200 < Oo0100-3-14

TABLE 3-2 0 <COHTItIUED)

AIR DATA GUHHARY BY YEAR INDICATOR STATIOtIS 0'R SAMPLE HAX ISOTOPE TYPE SIZE, MEAN HAX HIH STA I'IOH 1983 'OO I.LD 19 < . 0>0065 < Oi0100 < Oo0040 1983 BOO ~

POSITIVE 512 0.0197 0+0700 Oo0025 1983 B07 LLD 2 < Oo0350 < Oo0400 Oo0300 1983 B07 POSITIVE 19 0.0589 0.0/00 '.034C

'983 .C34 LLD 41 < Oi0059 < 0.0100 < 0.0014 1983 C37 LLD 41 < Oo0060 < Oo0100 < '..0015 5983 'C44 LLD 21 < .0.0082 < 0.020,0 ....,.< Oi0050 1983 531 LLD 504 ( 0.0510 < Oili00 < 0>0100 1983 I31 POSITIVE 0.0400 Oo0400 '.0400 1983 H95 'LD 21 < 0 0029 ( 0 0050 '.0016 O.j 1983 Z95 LLD 21 < Oa0051 < Oo0120 < 0.0030 CONTROL STATIONS SAHPI.E YR ISOTOPE TYPE SIZE HAX HDI 1983 BOO LLD 2 < 0 ~ 0075 < 'i0100 < 0 0050 '

1983 BOO POSITIVE S2 0.0159 0.0370 0 '031 1'983 B07 'OSITIVE 0.0305 Oo0420 0.0350 1983 C34 LLD 4 < Oi0058 < 0.0100 0.0014 1983 C37 LLD 4 < Oo0058 < 0.0100 < 0.001'3 1983 C44 LLD 2 < O.C065 < Oi0070 ( 0.0060 1983 I31 LLD 51 < 0.0502 ( 0+0700 . < Ci0200 1983 H95 , LLD 2 < Oo0025 ( 0.0030 < 0.0020 1983 29S LLD 2 < 0.0045 < Oe0060 < .O.C030 3-15

TABLE 3-2Ji WATER DATA

SUMMARY

3Y YEAR IHDICATOR STATIONS F Ci/L QAV SAMPLE I IC1AI YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE MAX MIt) STATIONS) 1980 BTG POSITIVE 3 10.68 14J33  ? ~ 4J 52 1980 H3G LLD 1 <'iOJ00 < 110JOO < 110.00 c'a 1980 H3G POSITIVE 3 230J00 330.00 90.00

'TG 4P'981 LLD 4.00 F 00 < 4JOO n ee 1981 BTG POSITIVE 10J16 11.30, M ~ JI 4P'R 1981 C34 POSITIVE iJ86 1.86 iJOu 1981 C37 POSITIVE 0.77 ~

0.77 '.?? ~4 l 1981 C60 LL9 OJ11 0.11 OJ J J 1981 H3G LLD 10.00 iCJOO 10.00 "30.00 ce 1'981 H3G POSITIVE 347 i 50 520.00 4P 1981 Z65 LLD 1.38 1.38 1.30 CONTROL STATION There were no control stations durina 1980 or 1981J The current control station (no. 26) was not or erational until August 1982 concurrent ~ith WHP-2's intake system conins on line.

3-16

TABLE 3"2. 1 (CONTINUED) q MATER DATA SUHHARY BY YEAR INDICATOR STATION'S SAMPLE

~Ci/L HAX Oj YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE llEAN >tAX >art~ S A I l'IJ >9 1982 AOT LLD -

1 < 0.30 Oo30 Oi30 1982 B40 LLD 36 . < 40o78, 130ioo 4 o,oo 1982 BTD LLD .

<" 2ooo 2100 2.00 1982 BTD POSITIVE 26 3.88 '6.00 '2.00 1982 BTG LLD 2 < 19o15 19 o30 ( 1A hh 1982 BTG POSITIVE 2 iho30 22ioo 10.60 1982 C34 LLD 36 < 5oi7 < 12>00 ( 1.00 1982 1982 1982 1982

~

C37 C58 Cho H03 LLD LLD LLD LLD 36 36 36 .

8

<< ~

5.36 hi14 6+32

'6O2.5O 13;00 25ooo

'13ooo 8"O.OO <

'1.00 1

"O.OO moo'.00 H03 POSITIVE 4, 397 o50 600.00 220+00 J

1982 H3G LLD 10 575 F 00 < 1300 F 00 ( 150+00 1'982 H3G POSITIVE 2 195.00 200.00 190ioo Vs 1982 I31 LLD,1 <

~

0o30 0

< Oo30 ( 0.30 1982 I59 LLD 36  :: <.:>: ~ 1ho72 93ooo < . 2.00 1982 L40 LLD 36 . ; <,'7o42 < 50.00 ( 3.00 1982 854 LLD 36:: ..' 5.36 . < lhooo ( 1.00 1982 H95 LLD 36':" < 6.89 29 ioo < 1.00 1982 S90 LLD Oioh 0.06 0.06

6

.: 1 < < <

1982 Z65 LLD < 10.81 < 27.00 ( 2.00 1982 Z95 LLD '6 <'5.25 63.00 < .2 00 3-17

TABLE 3-2,1 (COt)TINUED)

MATER DATA SUHHARY BY YEAR

'ONTROL STATION F Ci/L SAHPLE YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE HEAN HAX Hit) 1982 5' 45i00

'o00 B40 LLD 29o60 < < 14 ~ 00 1982 BTD POSITIVE 5 5.00 '1.00 1982 C34 LLD 5 < 3i80 < Oo00 < 2.00 1982 C37 LLD 5 < 3.80 , < 8+00 < 2.00 0 OW ~ >> ~

1982 . C58 LLD 5 < F 80 < 12i00 < 2.00 1982 C60 'LD 5 < 4i40 < 0.00 < ".OC 1'982 H03 LLD'2 < 650i00 < 800i00 < 500i00 1982 H03 POSITIVE 1 270+00 , 270i00 '70i00 1982 I59 'LD 5 < iio30 < 32i00 < 4.0C 1982 L40 LLD 5 < iltSO < 15 'O w 5tCC 1982 H54 LLD 5 < 4.00 9.00 2.00 1'98 N95 LLD 5 < 5.00 < 13i00 < 2.CO 1982 Z65 LLD 5 < 6i30 3iCC 1982 Z95 LLD 5 < 11 40 29.00 < 4.00

..3-18

Ll TABLE 3-2>i (CONTINUED)

MATER DATA

SUMMARY

BY YCAR INDICATOR STATIONS SIAM'0H SAMPLE MAX YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE MAX MIH 0.70 ' '<

1983 AOT LLD 3 0.95, 0.5C 1983 B40 LLD 44 < 58i50 =

< 300100 11.00 1983 BTD LLD 9 2o43 < 'oCO '

< l.'70 1983 BTD POSITIVE 23 2t15 ' 3o10 1.00

'983 BTG LLD 2.15 "

< 2.41 < 1.'70 1983 BTG POSITIVE 1 5.26 C nl 5126 CW 44, 1983 C34 . LLD 2192 ( ht00 ~ 1 ~ .10 1983 C37 LLD , 42 2.99 < 1 6.00 < 1.4C

~

1983 C37 POSITIVE 9.95 16'00 3.90 1983

.1983 C58 C60 .

LLD LI D 44 <

3188 3i51 10 F 00 8.00 1

1.50 40 0]

1983 H03 LLD 7 < 310.00 < 330.00 < 40C.OO 1983 H03 POSITIVE 310100 90.00 ... . 230.00 nn 4

~

": <,: 210+00

~

1983 H3G LLD. 7 287.14 300.00

~,

1983 H3G POSITIVE 4 1155.00 2600.00 290. CO 4ltt

-1983 I31 LLD 3 < 0o31 < 0.37 < 0127

~ WW W~~ S>>WW ~ << >> 0 ~

1983 I59 LLD 44 < 9116 < 30.00 < 4+'OC 1983 L40 LLD 44 < 31157 < 160 100 < 6.00 1983 M54 LLD 44 ' 3115 < 6100 1.40 1983 H95 LLD 42 < 3180 < 9100 < 1180 1983 S89 LLD 2 ( 225'0 < 300+00 150.00 1983 S90 LLD 3 ( 1188 < 3.00 0165 1983 S90 POSITIVE 2 0.34 Oo44 0124 1983 Z65 LLD 44 < 6.48 13100 31CO 1983 Z95 LLD 41 < 7.20 < lb.00 ( 3.00 3-19

TABLE 3-2m 1 (CONTINUED)

WATER DATA

SUMMARY

BY YEAR CONTROL STATION

,e SAMPLE

< Ci/L YR ANALYSIS TYPE ,',,; SIZE MEAN iRAn MIN 1983 B40 LLD 8.75 ~ 170i00 10.00 1983 BTD LLD 3 < 2i33 < 3)00 < 2.00 1983 BTD POSITIVE '7 2+74 5o00 1.90 1983 C34 LLD 2.88 5o00 1.50 ~

1983 C37 LLD 2i96 5o00 1.40 1983 C58 LLD 12, < 3o83 < 7o00 .

2i00 1983 C50 LLD 12 < 3+52 < 5.00 < 1.60

, 1983 H03 LLD ,3 < 310o00 < 330oOC < 300oOC 1983 I

I59 LLD 12 < '+08 < 20e00 < 3o00 1983 L40 LLD . 12 < 32i92 < 90i00 '.00 1983 M54 LLD '2 3o08 'o00 4 150 1983 N95 LLD 12 . 3i92 8o00 2.00 1983 S13 POSITIVE 6o40 6.40 6i40 1983 S89 'LLD 120.00 12C.OO 1"O.CO 1983 S90 LLD io20 1.20 1.2C 1983 Z65 LLD 12 < 6o50 11.00 4o00 1983 Z95 LLD 1'1, < 7+64'3+00 '4. 00 3-20

'I

' TABLE 3-2t2 SEDIMENT DATA SJMMARY DY YEAR INDICATOR STATIONS r.Ci/A SAMPLE 'lAX

....YR 'NALYSIS TYPE SIZE tlAX MtIH AT E1'TQtl 1978 C37 POSITIVE 2 .490.00 330tco 'f VI k

1978 C58 LLD 2 < 1SO.OO < 150+00 150.00 1'978 C60 POSITIVE 2 350ooo 330too 320too 34 F:

1978 K40 POSITI'VE 2 ' 15500.00 21000too incoo.oo, 1978 M54 LLD 2 < 150.00 < 150too < 150.00 1978 N95 LLD, 2 < 150.00 < 150toO . < 150.00

,19?8 Z65 LLD ( 1SO F 00 ( 150 00 F ( 150 ~ 00 1'973 Z65 POSITIVE 1 370.00 3?ot00 3?G.GO 1978 Z9S LLD 2. < 150ooo 150.00 < 150t00

. CONTROL STATION 0]

pCi/K5 SAMPLE YR AHALYSIS TYPE SiZE MAX ilIH 1978 C37 POSITIVE 2 290eoo 360ioo 220.0C 1978 C58 LLD 2 . < 150.00 < 150.00 ( 150.00 1978 C60 'LD 1 < 150 ioo < 150+00 < 150.00 1978 C60 POSITIVE 1 590ooo 590.CO 590.00.

1978 K40 POSITIVE 2 '1500ioo 12000+00 . 11000.00 1978 M54 LLD 2 < 150ooo < 150.00 < 150+00 1978 H95 LLD 2 < 150.00 < 150too < 150.00 1978 Z65 LI 2 < 150too < 150toO 150.00

~-

D <

1978 Z95 LLD 2 < 150.00 < 150too < 150too t

3-21 I ~

TABLE 3"2i2 (COHTIHUED)

SEDIMEHT DATA

SUMMARY

BY YEAR INDICATOR STATIOHS rCi/Ks SAMPLE i lrtX YR AHALYSIS TYPE ~i SIZE MEAN MAX MIH St' T T O i I 1979 C37 POSITIVE 2 450.00 480.00 420.00 34 1979 C58 LLD 2 . < 150i00 < 150i00 < 150i00 1979 POSITIVE -'70 170i00 170.00 cQ i ~

C58

~

1 W W ~ i 00 OO 0&

34 1979 C60 POSITIVE -

2 535o00 610.00 460.00 34

~0 'W  % % 0%% <<%%% W ~ >>%% N ~

1979 M54 LLD 2, < '50+00 < 150.00 < 150i00 1'979 H95 LLD 2 < 150 00 < 1 0.00 <

150.00'979 Z65 LLD 2 < 150o00 < 150.00 < 150.00 1979 Z95 LLD 2 < 150o00 < 150i00 < 150.00 I'; COHTROL STATION

~

r Ci/KI SAMPLE YP. AHALYSIS TYPE SIZE MiAX MIH 1979 C37 POSITIVE 2 . 310i00 310.00'10.00

~ ~

1979 C58 LI D 2 < 150e00 < 150i00 < 150.00 1979 C60 POSITIVE 2 130i00 130+00 130 i 00 1979 M54 LLD 2 < 150o00 < 150i00 < 150.00 1979 H95 LLD 2 , < 150i00 -

< 150o00 < 150.00 1979 Z65 LLD 2 < 150+00 < 150i00 < 150.00 1979 Z95 LLD 2 < 150.00 < 150i00 < 150i00 3-22

TABLE 3"2;" (COttTIHUED)

SEDIHEHT DATA

SUMMARY

DY YEAR IHDICATOR STATIOt)S r Ci/Ks SAHPLE HAX YR AHALYSIS TYPE SIZE MAX MIN STATION 1980 C37 LLD 1 < 150o00 < 150>00 < 150.00

~ ~ w r w w rww w ~

r

-I 1980 C58 LLD 1 < 150o00 < 150o00 < 150)00 ~ 1 1980 Ch0 LLD , 1' 150i00 < 150>00 <. 150o00 1980 M54 LLD 1 < 150o00 < 150+00 < '150.00 1980 H95 LI D 1 < 150.00 < 150o00: < 150.CO 1'980 Zh5 LLD 1 , < 150o00 < 150o00 .< 15CeCQ w>>

~

~ m ~ r ~ 0 ~ >> w r ~ ~

1'980 Z95 LLD 1 ( 150o00 1SO.OO < 150.00 CONTROL STATION SAHPLE

( Ci/Ks Oj YR AHALYSIS TYPE SIZE MEAH MAX 1980 C37 POSITIVE 2 180.00 200o00 ihO.CC 1980 C58 LLD 2 < 150+00 < 150.00 < 150 F 00.

1980 ChO LLD 2 < 150o00 < 150i00 150.00 1980 K40 POSITIVE I 13000i00 13000 o 00 13000 F 00 1980 '54 LLD 2 < 150o00 < 150o00 ( 1SO.CO 1980 H95 LLD 2 < 150.00 < 1SO >00 < 150.OO 1980 1980 Zh5 Z95 LLD LLD .

~ ~

2 2

w r>>

(

I 150+00 0 r r Ow 150.00

~

150.00

\

150+00 <

< 150+00 150.CO

. I

(

r ~

3~23

P TABLE 3-2.2 (CONTINUED)

SEDIMEt!T DATA

SUMMARY

BY YEAR INDIGATOR STATIONS

>Ci/K8 SAMPLE "X

'R AHALYSIS TYPE "

SIZE . MEAN MAX MIH STAT IOt)

~ l ~ <<0 1981 C37 .'OSITIVE 2 300.00 500.00 100.00 '74 1981 . C58'.LD 2 < 150too < 150too , < 150)00 OW 0 OWW ~ >> << ~

1981 C60 . LLD 2 < 150.00 < 150.00 < 150.00 1981 K40 POSITIVE 2 14950 t 00 16900 t 00 13000. 00 1981 M54 LLD 2 < 150.00 < 150.00 < 150)00 1981 H95 LLD 2 < 150too . < 150)00 150)00 1981 Z65 LLD 1 < 150.00 150)00 < iFC)OC W ~

1981 Z95 LLD 2 < 150too < 150)00 < 150)00

COHTROL STATIOH

~Ci/Kd SAMPLE YR 'AHALYSIS TYPE SIZE MEAH MAX 1981 C37 LLD 1 < 150.00 < 150too g 150)00 1981 C37 POSITIVE ' 2OO,OO . 2OO,OO 2OO,OO 1981 C58 LLD 2 < 150+00 < 150too ' 150.00 1981 C60 . LLD 2 < 150.00 < 150too < 150.00 1981 K40 POSITIVE 2 16100.00 '8000too . 14200too 1981 M54 LLD ' < 150too < 150)00 < 150)00 1981 H95 LLD 2 < 150too < 150too < 150too 1981 Z65 LLD 1 < 150)00 < 150too < 150.00 1981 Z95 LLD 2 < 150too < 150too 150too 3>>24

TABLE 3"2i2 (COt(TINUED)

SEDIMENT DATA

SUMMARY

BY YEAR It!DIGATOR STATIONS SAMPLE

-Ci/Kd MA" 0)

YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE MAX MDl STAT IQti

'1982 C34 LLD 1 < 150+00 < 150o00 < 150.00 1982 C37 POSITIVE 1 310i00 - 310+00 310.00 34 ]

1982 K40 POSITIVE 1 24000+00 24000i00 24000oCO 34 CONTROL STATIOH pCi/KM SAMPLE YR AHALYSIS TYPE SIZE 1982 . C34 LLD 1 < . 150o00 < 150o00 < 150'00 1982 1982 C37 K40 LLD.

POSITIVE '

1 < 180e00 19000+00

, < 180p00 19000 F 00

< 130.00 19'000.00 e

3-25

TABLE 3"2i2 (CONTINUED)

SEDIMEHT DATA

SUMMARY

BY YEAR IHDICATOR STATIONS p . SAMPLE r Ci/KS MAX YR AHAl YSIS TYPE SIZE MEAN MAX MIN STATION 1983 A28 POSITIVE 1 440o00 440o00 440o00 1983 B14 . POSITIVE 2 525o00 620.00 430.00 34 1983 C34 LU) 2 < 90+00 =

< 130o00 < 50.00 C34 . POSITIVE 1 130.00 '30.00 130o00

'983 34 1983 C37 POSITIVE ' 440o00, 550o00. 260.00 -

34

'983 K40 POSITIUE 3 =

16666o66 21000o00 .12000e00 34 19S3 L12 POSITIVE 2 '20>00 570e00 470o00 1983 L14 POSITIVE 2 495o00 520>00 470 00 34 1983 R26 POS ITIUE .' 510.00 570o00 450.00 34 19S3." TOS ... POSITIVE ,

7QOo00 770+00 , 630.00 34

~

CONTROL STATIOH

~

sCi/Kd SAMPLE YR ANALYSIS TYPE, SIZE MEAH MIN

..2'30i00 1983 A28 POSITIVE 830.00 830.00 1983 B14 POS ITIUE -

615o00 880o00 350.00 1983 C34 LLD 3 < 95.57 < 140.00 < 50.00 1983 C37 LLD 2 . < 90i00 < '"130o00 < 50i00 1983 C37 POSITIVE 1 180o00., 130.00 130o00 1983 . - "" "

, K40 POSITIVE 3 18333+33 19000>00 17000.00 1983 L12'OSITIVE 2 . 610+00 . 710i00, , ....510>00 1983 '14... POSITIVE 2 670+00 . S50.00 490+00 1983 , R26 POSITIUE . 2 ., 640.00 860.00 '20o00 1983 T08 'OSITIVE 2 750oOO . 800<00. >00o00 ti 3-26

TABLE 3"2i3 SOII DATA

SUMMARY

BY YEAR 1HDICATOR STATIONS

'R pCi/K8..

ANALYSIS TYPE SAMPLE SIZE MAX, .MIN MAX STATION 1978 'C37 LLD 1 < 150 F00 150o00 < 150.CC 0

197S C37 POSITIVE 3 566i67 700+00  ; '00+00 3 g 1978 C58 LLD '

4 < 150o00 150o00 150o00 1978 C60 LLD 4 < 150o00 < 150i00 150.00 197S I59 'LD 4 < 250o00 < 260.00 250o00 1978 K40 . POS IT I VE 4 11250+00 13000 o 00 10000..00 1978 M54 LLD 4 < 150>00 < 150.00 150 00 1978 H95'LD 4 < 150.00 < 150.00 150.00 197S Z65 LLD 8 < 150+00 < 150.00 '150.00 1978 Z95 LLD . 4 - .< , 150+00 < '50.00 150 00

~)

CONTROL STATIOH aCi/Ks SAMPLE YR AHALYSIS . TYPE SIZE MEAN MAX MIN 1978 C37 POSITIVE 140 +00 140 F00 140.00 197S C58 '

LLD 1 < 150.00 < 150.00 < 150.00 1978 C60 LLD 1 < 150o00 < 150.00 < 150.00 1978 I59 LLD 1 < 260.00 260>00 < 260oCO 1978 K40 POSITIVE 1 7000+00 7000.00 7000.00 1978 M54 LLD < 150+00 < 150+00 < 150.00 1978 H95 LLD 1 < 150.00 < 150i00 < 250o00 1978 Z65 LLD 2 <

0 150o00

~

150 F00 0

< 150 >OC 4.I 197S Z95 LLD 1 < 150o00 < 150.00 < 150>00 3~27

~ 0 TABLE 3-2o3 (COHTIttUED)

SOIL DATA

SUMMARY

BY YEAR

'tAX IHDIGATOR STATIONS eCillia SAMPLE YR AHALYSIS TYPE . SIZE STATIOH 1979 C37 LLD 150+00 < 150o00 < 150.00

, t 1979 C58 LLD 150.00 < 150.00 150.00 1979 C60 LLD 150o00 . < 150.00 < 150o00 1979 M54 LLD >> 150100 . < 150 ~ 00 < '50 ~ 00 1979 H95 LLD 150)00 < 150.00 . < 150o00 1979 Z65 . LLD 150i00 < 150t00 < 150.00 i t ~

1979 Z95 ...-" . LLD 150.00 150.00 150.00 CONTROL STATIOH, aCil'tY5 SAMPLE YR AHALYSIS TYPE SIZE . MAX MItt 1979 C37 LLD 150+00 150.00 150 F 00

'97'9 C58 LLD 150o00 150.00 140too 1979 C60 LLD 1 < 150t00 150.00 150t00 1979 M54 LLD 1 < 150.00 150.00 150t00 1979 H95 'LD 1 < 150+00 150.00 150o00 1979 Z65 LLD 150o00 150.00 140 F 00 1979 Z95 LLD 1 , < 150i00 150.00 '

150t00 3-28

TABLE 3-2i3 (COt/TItIUED)

SOIL DATA

SUMMARY

BY YEAR INDICATOR STATIONS

~Ci/Ks SAMPLE MAX YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE MAX MItI ST ATIOH 1980 1980 1980 C37 C37-C58 LI.D 0

POSITIUE

\

3, 1

&& ~ ~

< 150 o00

~ ~

1550i00 150i00 0 ~

150.00 W 0'W&

1880o00 150.00 150 CC m

1120o00 150o00

<<  ?

w 5 ~ .~ ~P 198Q C60 -

LLD 4 < 150o00 < 150o00 < 150oOO 1980 H54 LLD 4 < 150.00 < 150.00 150o00 1980 H95 LLD . 4 < 150 F 00 . < 150o00 < iuO.QQ Z65 LLD 150.00 150.00

'980.

4 < < 1SO.OO <

1980 Z95 'LLD 150.00 '

, 4 < 150.00 iuC.OO

~ \ ~

COHTROL STATION r

~Ci/Kc SAHPLE YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE HAX tIIH 0 <<0 1980 C37 LLD 1 < 1SO.OO '50.00 < 150.00 1980 C58 LLD 1 < 150o00 < 150o00 < 150.00 1980 C60 LLD 1 < 150i00 < 150o00 < 150s00 1980 M54 LLD 1 , < 150+00 < 150+00 < 150o00 1'980 H95 LLD 1 < 150o00 < 150+00 < 150oQO Z65 ' 150i00 1980 LLD 1 < 150'00 < 150.00 1980 Z95 LLD 1' 150.00 < 150.00 150o00 3-29

'fABLE 3-2>3 (COHTIHUED)

COIL'ATA

SUMMARY

BY YEAR INDICATOR STATIOHS t:. r Ci/K~

YR AHALYSIS TYPE 'IZE.SAMPLE MEAH MA" MAX

'IH,"TATIOt) 1981 C37 LLD -' 3 < 250+00 < 250+00 < 150o00 I

1981 C37 POSITIVE 2 700.00 700o00 700i00  : 7

~ o~w w ~ w \w & w>> w ~

1 981 CSS ':. ',LLD 4 < 250o00 < , 250.00 < 150oGO 1981 C50'.;;. '..L'LD 4 < 250o00 < 150.00 < 150.CO tg 1981 K40 .: POSITIVE 13750.00 15000 F 00 , 1300C ~ OC

~ ~

1982 M54 LLD 4 < 150.00 < 250+00 < 150.00 1981 H95 LI D 4 < 150.00 , < 150.00 < 250i00 1981 Z55 LLD ~ 4 < 250o00 < 250)00 < 1 0.00 1981 Z95 . 'LD 4 < 150.00 150+00 < '50+00 COHTROL STATIOH rCi/Kz SAMPLE YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE MItl 1981 C37 >

LLD 1 < 150.00 ,250o00 < 15C.OC 1981 C58 LLD . < 250<00 < 150o00 < 250o00 1981 C50 LLD 1 < '50o00 250o00 < 150o00 1981 K40 POSITIVE 1 13000.00 23000+00 23000 o 00 1981 M54 LLD 1 < 150.00 < 250i00 < . 150.00 1981 H9S LLD 1 < 1SO.OO < 250i00 < 250i00 1981 Z55 LLD 1 < 250oOO <. 1SO.OO 250 F 00 1981 Z95 LLD 1 < 150o00 < 150.00 < 1SO.OO 3-30

TABLE 3-2>3 (CGHTIt(UED)

SOIL, DATA SUNtlARY BY YEAR ItlDICATOR STATIONS l

~Ci/Q SAHPLE HAX YR AHALYSIS TYPE SIZE i)AX OTATIGH 198" C34 LLD 4 25+00 30.00 20i00 1982 C37 l.LD 1 < 20.00 20.00 '20'0 1982 C37 POSITIUE 3 226 i67 330ioo Goooo 1982 S90 POSITIVE 26o00 43o00 15.00 COHTROL STATIOH r Ci/K~

SAttPLE YR AHAl.YSIS TYPE SIZE tlAX 1982 1982

'34 C37 LLD POSIT IVE

. 1 1

< 20.00 340o00 20.00 340>00

.0.00 0

1982 S90 LLD 10 ion 10.00 1O.OO 3-31

TABLE 3-2i3 (CQHTIt(UED)

SOIL DATA

SUMMARY

BY YEAR INDICATOR STATIONS

- YR ANALYSIS TYPE SAMPLE SIZE

~Ci/KS MAX MAX STATIOtc 1983 A28 ' POSITIVE 746i67 '840.00 500i00 1983 B12 POSITIVE 720i00 720i00 720i00 L': 1983 814 POSITIVE 4 =

552.50 '30.00 420.00 1983 C34 LLD 8 88i75 < 150i00 < 40.00 75i00 40.00 1983 C37 LLD 6 110.00 <

1983 C37 POSITIVE 585i00 700.00 470i00 1983 K40 POSITIVE 8 15625i00 21000.00 10000.00 2 1'983 L12 POSITIVE 4 270.00 . 400i00 160i00 I 1983 L14 POSITIVE 635i00 "780i00 470i00 1983 R26 POSITIVE 592.50 760i00 460 i 00 1983'08 POSITIVE 670 i 00 850.00 500i00 tl3 L'-y .

CONTROL STATION iCi/K5 SAMPLE YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE MIH 1983 A28 POSITIVE 1 700i00 700.00 700.00 1983 B14 POSITIVE 1 '80i00 580.00 500i00 1983 C34 LLD 2 < ?5i00 110i00 40i00 1983 C37 . LLD 1 . < 110i00 110i00 110 i 00 1983 C37 POSITIVE 1 200i00 200i00 200iOO 1983 K40 POSITIVE 2 15000i00 16000.00 14CCO.OO 1983 L12 POSITIVE 1 400.00 400.00 400i00 1983 L14 POSITIVE 1 750.00 750 F 00 750 i 00 1983 R26 POSITIVE 1 670.00 670i00 670i00 1983 T08 POSITIVE 1 800.00 000i00 300.00 3~32

TABLE 3"2i4 MILK DATA

SUMMARY

BY YEAR IHDICATOR STATIOHS

. I eCi/L SAMPLE MAX YR AHALYSIS TYPE SIZE STATIOH 1982 B40 LLD 45 34 s67 150o00 6o00 1'982 -C34 ~ ,LLD . 45 4o04 14o00 . < io00 1982 C37 LLD 3+86 < 12e00 li00 1982 C37 POSITIVE 1 Oi02 Oo02 Oo02 40 1982 L40 LI D 16.60 < 66o00 < 5oOO COHTROL STATION f

~

eCi/L

~

'6'6 SAMPLE

~ YR AHALYSIS . TYPE SIZE MEAH MAX MIt>

~ ~

. 1982 B40 LLD < , 37o25 110o00 13oCO 1982 . C34 LLD < 4oi9 9.00 io00 198" C37 LLD '. 15 ( 4.00 9iGO 1.00 1982 L40 LLD 16 ' < 17.53 48.00 5,00 e-3~33

TABLE 3"2i4 (COt!TINUED)

MILK DATA

SUMMARY

BY YEAR INDICATOR STAT IOt)S

, SAMPLE FCic L NX YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE MIN STATIOt(

1983 B40 LLD 60 182i87 5000.00 14(CO 1983 C34 LLD 60 < 3+20 Sinn 0+90 t

"P l 1983 1983 C37 C37

, LLD

'OSITIVE 59 1

"< 35

'::--:;. '... 1'20

'+00 1.20 1o30 1 o20 1983 I31 LLD 54 < 0.53 1.00 Oo 10 1983 K40 POSITIVE 33 .. 1333.33 1700inn 1100.0C 1983 L40 LLD 60 -- <, 48.18 -: .<'.. 1000.00 $ .00, CONTROL STATIOH

'li

. SAMPLE eCi/L YR ANALYSIS TYPE '

~ >> P SIZE P PP W W P P MEAH NX ',MIN 1983 B40 ' LLD 20 86.50 500.00 i . '1$ .CO 1983 C34 .LLD 2i96 "CC < 100 1983 C37 LLD 20 3o23 8+00, < 1 i 10 1983 I31 LLD 18 < Oo53 lo00 < *: ','Oo09

'263'4 P

1983 K40 POSITIVE 11 '.'lnno00 '400i00 1983 L40 LLD 20 < 43'5 300 F00 'w '

' '7 ~ 00

~ P P

/',

Pl%

CCPP P C P

P 3-34

TABLE 3-2o5 g.

FISH DATA

SUMMARY

BY YEAR IHDICATOR STATIOHS r.Ci/K5 SAMPLE MAX YR AHALYSIS TYPE SIZE MAX MIH STATION C

1978 C37 LLD 8 < 130o00 < 130.00 < 130oCO 1978 C58 LLD 8 <. 130.00 < 130o00 < 130.00 197S C60 LLD 8 < 130o00 < 130.00 < 130o00 1978 I59 LLD 8 < 260.00 < 260o00 < 260i00 1978 K 40 POSITIVE 1 3200+00 3200.00 3200.00 30 "I 197S - M54 LLD -

8 < 130e00 < 130.00 < 130.00 1978 H95 . LL'D . 8 < 130.00 < 130.00 < 130.00 197S. Z65 . LLD 260.00 < "60.00 2u0.00

'I ~

197S Z95 LLD 8 130.00 < 130o00 130.00 COHTROL STATIOH eCi/K5 SAMPLE YR AHALYSIS TYPE SIZE MEAH MIH:-

1978

~

1978

~ 0 C37 C58 W W O>><<I LLD LLD

" 2 A

2

\

130o00

~

130+00 W 0 130.00 W

130.00

~

130oGO W

130o00 1978 C60 LLD, 2 < 130+00 < 130.00 < 130.00 1978 I59 LLD 2 < 260+00 < 260.00 < 260.00 1978 K 40 POSITIVE 1 4300.00 4300 00 F 4300100 1978 M54 LLD 2 < 130o00 < 130.00 < 130>00 1978 H95 LLD 2 < 130.00 < 130+00 < 130.00

'1978 1978 Z65 Z95 LLD LLD 2 <

260>00 130.00 260.00 130o00 260i00 130o00 yl 3-35

TABLE 3s2-5 (COt<TIt(UED)

FISH DATA

SUMMARY

BY YEAR IHDICATOR STATIONS eCi/KS SAMPLE MAX YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE MIN STATION 1979 C37 LLD 130.00 130.00 130+00

'979 C58 LLD 130o00 130o00 , < 130.00 5

1979 M54 LLD 130o00 130o00 130.00 1979 H95 LLD 5 130i00 130o00 130+00 1979 Z65 LLD 130+00 130.00 '30.00 1979 Z95 'LD 130 F 00 130.00 130s00 CONTROL STATION s Ci/Kd SAMPLE YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE MEAH MAX MI'f 1979 C37 LLD 2 , < 130+00 < 130.00 130> 00 1979 C58 LLD 130+00 ' 130>00 < 130.00 1979 . M54 LLD ". : 2 .

< . 130..00 <: '..130i00 < '30.00 197'9 H95 LLD 2 130.00 < 130o00 < 130'00 '<<

<<OW 1979 "Z65 LLD 2 < 130i00 < 130+00 < 130o00

'95 LLD 2 < 130i00 < 130 F 00 '"-". '-'<""130ov0

'979 3>>36

TABLE 3.2-5 (CONTINUED)

FISH DATA

SUMMARY

BY YEAR I thDI GATOR STATIONS SAMPLE

'~Ci/Ka MAX 0)

YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE MEAN itIH STATION 1980 C34 LLD 123.75 ' 130.00 ( 80ioo 1980 C37 LLD 130+00 - < 130+00 < 130ioo 1980 C58 LLD 8 < -

123.75 < 130.00 < 80.00 1980 Ceo LLD 8 < '123o75 ( 130ioo 30.00 1980 M54 LLD 8 < 123o75 < 130ioo < 30.00 1980 Z65 LLD 8 188'75 '60 00 -'0.00 CONTROL STATIOtl

~ ~

'eCi/K5

. I

'R AHALYSIS 'YPE SAMPLE SIZE MIH Oj 1980 C34 LLD '130.00 < 130ioo < 130.00 1980 C37 LLD ~

2 < 130.00 ( 130.00 ( 13C.CC 1980 C58 LLD 2 < 130.00 < 130.00 < 130.00 198O CeO LLD 2 < 130.00 < 130.00 < 130.00 1980 1980 M54 Z65 'LD LLD 2 2

0>> <

130+00

~ ~

195+00

~

130 00 260ioo

(

130i00 130+00 0-3 037

4

'ABLE 3t2 5 <COHTIHUED)

FISH DATA

SUMMARY

BY YEAR I

IHDICATOR STATIOHS r Ci/K5 SAHPLE HAX YR AHALYSIS TYPE SIZE MEAH HAX HIH STATIOH 1981 C34 LLD 6 ' 130e00 130.00 130.00 1981 C37 LLD 6 < 130o00 130o00 130o00 1981 C58 LLD ~

6 < 130.00 130+00 130.00 1981 C60 LLD 6 < 130o00 130e00 130)00 1981 M54 LLD 6 < 130+00 130+00 '130.00 1981 'Z65 LLD 6 < 130 F 00 < 130 F 00 < 130+00 CONTROL STATIOH pCi/K5 SAHPLE I-e YR ANALYSIS

~

TYPE W &&0&>>

SIZE 'EAH

~

MAX HIH 1981 C34 LLD 2 < 130+00 < 130o00 < 130o00 1981 C37 LLD 2 < 130i00 < '130.00 < 130o00 1981 C58 LLD 2 .< 130i00 <- 130o00 < 130.00 1981 C60 LL9 2 < 130+00 < 130o00 130.00 1'981'54 LLD 2 < 130o00 130>00 < 130.00 1981 Z65 LLD 2 < 130.00 < 130.00 130.00

'ri

~,

3-38

TABLE 3o2-5 (CONTINUED)

FISH DATA SUHHARY BY YEAR INDICATOR STATIONS 1

s Ci/Kd SAHPLE HAX YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE HAX H N 'TATION 1982 C34 LLD 23+75 < 40+00 < 10.00

~ 0 'WWW W OW 0<<

~

1982 C37 LLD 8 < 22'+50 < . 40i00 10+00 1982'58" LLD , 8 < 25i00 < 30o00 < 20o00 1982 C60 LLD ' 8 < 20.00 < 30+00 < 10.00 1982 IS9 LLD 8 < . 63+75 .< .70o00 < 50o00 1982 H54 LLD 8 23+75 < 40o00 ( 10o00 0 WW>> >> ~ ~

1982'65 8 < 43>75 < 70>00 < 20.00, CONTROL STATION eCi/Kd SAHPLE YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE MAX . MIN 1982 1982 C34 C37 ~

LLD:

OWW&W LLD.,-'

~ ~ W

. 2 W

W

\

<<0>>

~

15e00

~

1500

~ 0 20>00 20 F00 idiCC 10+00

~

1982 C58 LLD ', " -

2 < 25)00 < '0o00 < 20od0 1982 C60 LLD ': 2 < 15.00 < 20>00 10o00 W~

1982 I59 LLD

' 40.00 . < 40.00 < 40+00 1982 H54 LLD,',",',2 < 15 F00 20o00 < 10.00 1982 LLD'. ' '

Z65 30o00 < 40+00 < 20+00 3-39

TABLE 3i2-5 (COHTIttUED)

FISH DATA SUtNAR ~ BY YEAR IttDICATOR STATIONS e SAMPLE r Ci/K8 iMAX YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE MAX GTATIOtt 1983 C34 LLD 19+00 < 40+00 < 6.CO 1983 C37 LLD 5 < 30i00 < 40.00: < 20.00 1983 C37 POSITIVE 34ii7 50e00 16.00 30 1983 1983 C58 C60 LLD',

LLD 11 11 25o27 26i27 50i00 40i00 9+00 9.00 1983 I59 LLD 11 ( 98i18 . < '00i00 30.00 1983 K40 POSITIVE 11 3281o82 2000iQC 4200.00'2i73 1983 M54 LLD =-

11 (, '0iOO 3 iOO 1983 i65 . LLD 11 61 o82 '. <., 110i00 ( 20.00

~

-e

'l COHTROL STATION F'Ci<<KC SAMPLE YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE MEAH MAX MIH OW 1983 C34 LLD 2 17o00 19 i 00 < 15.00 1983 . C37 LLD 2 19i50 < 20e00 19.00 1983' C58 LLD . 2 28o50 < 40i00 < 17i00

<<,'1983 C60 . 20o00 . 20i00 < 2Ci00 LLD'LD 1983 I5'9 2 95o00 < 140.00 < 50i00 4~

1983 K40 POSITIVE 2 . '000+00 3100i00 2900 F 00 1983 M54 LLD 2 < 18+50 < 20i00 < 17.00 1983 Z65 LLD 2 < 55.00 .< 60.00 < 50.00 e

3-40

TABLE 3"2>6.

PRODUCE DATA

SUMMARY

BY VE'AR IHD1CATOR STATIONS sCi/K5 SAMPLE I ISA YR AHALYSIS TYPE SIZE . MAX MIH STATION 1978, C34 LLD . 2 < 80.00 < 80+00 < 00+00 1978 C37 LLD '4 <. 00+00 < 80.00 < .30.00 1'978 C58 LLD 14 < 80i00 < ,80o00 < 30,00 1978 C60 LLD 14 80'00 ' 80.00 . < 30.00 1'978 K40 POSITIVE 5100.00 10000.00 3500.00 37 1978 M54 LLD 14 < 80o00 < 80.00 < 30.CC 1978 H95 . LLD 14 80.00 00.00 30oCO I

1978 Z65 LLD 11 < 80.00 < GOi00 QOiCC 1978 Z95 LLD 14 80i00 30i00 00.00 CONTROL STATION, ~

Oi aCi/Ks SAMPLE YR ANALYSIS . TYPE SIZE 'AX MIN 1978 C34 LLD 4 < 80o00 < 30>00 80o00 1978 C37 LLD ';. 12 < '0.00 < 80+00 < GOo00 1978 C58 LLD 12 < 80.00 < 00.00 < 00.00

'2 1978 C60 LLD 12 < 80+00 < . &0.00 < 00i00 1978 K40 POSITIVE 4 '025+00 5400.00 3000o00 1978 M54 LLD < 80o00 < 80o00 < 30.00 1978 H95 LLD 12 < 80+00 < 80.00 < 30o00 1978 Z65 LLD 12 80.00 80o00 00.00

~-

W 1978 Z95 LLD 12 < 00>00 < 00o00 < 00.00 3-41

TAIrLE 3"2o6 (COHTIt)UED)

PRODUCE DATA

SUMMARY

DY YEAR INDICATOR STATIONS L-. r Ci/Ks SAMPLE YR AHALYSIS TYPE SIZE MEAN MAX MIH 1979 C37 LLD 18 82.78 130<00 80>00 1979 C58 LLD 18 82o78 130+00 80.00 1979 C60 'LD 18 82+7& 130o00 1979 M54 LLD 18 82 78 130.00 < 00.00 30i00'30o00 1979 H95 LLD 18 82(78 80.00 1979 Z65 LLD 18 82o78 130o00 < 80o00 1979 Z95 LLD 18 82(78 130o00 30 00 CONTROL STATION aCi/K<

SAMPLE YR AHALYSIS TYPE SIZE 'EAN MAX MIN 1979 C37 LLD 80i00 00.00 30>00 1979 C5& ...LLD 16 80'00 30>00 (, QO.CO 1979 C60 . LLD 16 80+00 '. 80'>00 30.0C 1979 M54 LLD 16 80+00 30o00 30o00 1979"'95 LLD 16 80o00 80o00 00i00 1979 Z65 LLD 1,6 < 80o00 80+00 30oCO 1979 Z95 LLD 16 < '0o00- 80o00 30o00 3-42

TABlE 3-2o6 (CONTINUED)

PRODUCE DATA

SUMMARY

DY YEAR INDICATOR STATIONS

,I s Ci/Ka SAMPLE MAX YR AHALYSIS TYPE SIZE MEAN MAX MIH STATION I-,

~ >>

1980 C37 LLD 13 80+00 00i00 < 80.00 1980 C58 -

LLD 80i00 < 80>00 . < 80i00 1980 C60 LLD . 13 80+00 00>00 < GO.OO 1980 M54 LLD, 13 80 F00 < 80.00 < 80.00 1980 N95 LLD' 13 80.00 < 80i00 < 80.00 1980 Z65 LLD 13 80e00 . < 80o00 < QO.OO 1980 Z95 LLD '3.. 80.00 80>00 < 80.00 CONTROL STATION SAMPLE eCi/Kd Oj YR . ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE MI'(

1980 C37 LLD 80.00 80o00 QO.OO 1980 C58 LLD 13 .80+00 80.00 QOo00 1980 C60 LLD 13 80o00 80+00 < 00.00 1980 M54 LLD 13 80.00 00'oOg, - < 00o00 1980 H95 LLD 13 '0.00 '0'00 '

QO.OO 1980 Z65 LLD 13 < 80i00  ; 80.00 < QO.OO 1980 Z95 LLD 13 "

< 80.00 80 F00 . < 00.00 3-43

TABLE 3-2oh (CONTINUED)

PRODUCE DATA SUHHARY BY YEAR INDICATOR STATIONS L; SAHPLE r Ci/Kd HAX YR AHALYSIS TYPE SIZE HEAH HAX Mit( STATION 0 W ~

1981 C37 LLD 12 < . 80 00 < 00.00 ( 30 00 1981 C58 LLD 12 < 30+00 < '0+00 < 80.00 1981 ChO LLD 12 < 00+00 < 00+00 '.. < 80o00 1981 H54 LLD 9 < 80i00 ( 00.00 < GOo00 1981 H95 LLD 12 < 80 F 00 < 80o00 < 00.00 1981 Z65 LLD 12 < 80+00 00000 < 30.00 19S1 'Z95.- " LLD . 12 < 80o00 ( 00.00 30.00 COHTROL STATION.

Ly YR AHALYSIS TYPE SAMPLE SIZE MEAN aCi/K5.

MAX MIt) 1981. C37 LLD 12 < SO<00 ( 00.00 30.00 1981 C5S LLD 12 < 80+00 ( 00.00 < 30.00 1981 C60 LLD . 12 < 80.00 < 30.00 < 30.00 E 1981 M54 LLD 12 < 80.00 < 30+00 ( 30'CO 0

1981 H95 LLD 12 < 80.00 < 00eCO < 00.00 1981 Z65 LLD 12 < 00.00 < SOo00 ..<. 00.00 1981 Z95 LLD 80.00 00.00 ' 00.00 12 < <

TABLE 3-2mb (CONTINUED)

]

PRODUCE DATA SVHHARY BY YEAR INDICATOR STATIONS SAHPLE

>Ci/Ks 0)

YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE HEAN MAX MIN GTATIOtt

!982 C34 LLD 12 < 58.33 < 140.00 < 10o00 1982 C37 LLD 12 < 57i50 < 140o00 .

' '0.00 1982 I31 LLD 12 < 190.00 < 1000~00 10.00 CONTROL STATION AC!/Ks SAHPLE YR ANAI YSIS TYPE SIZE MAX Mitt 1

1982 C34 LLD 12 < 42o50 < 120o00 < 20,00 1982 1982 C37 I31 LLD LLD 12 12 42.50 149ii7 120o00 890.00 20.00 30.00 0]

J 3-45

I ""w TABLE 3-2>6 (COHTIHUED)

PRODUCE DATA

SUMMARY

DY YEAR IHDICATOR STATIONS

YR AHALYSIS TYPE SAMPLE SIZE r.Ci/K5 HAX HAX STAT IOH 1983 C34 LLD 14 . < 42e14 70i00 10 iOO 1983 C37 LLD 14 . < 44o29 80o00 10.00 1983 '31 LLD 14 < 52.14 110.00 20'O 1983 K40 LLD 1 < 2000+00 2000.00 , < 2000o00 1983 K40 POSITIVE 11 2869.09 6400.00 SGOo00 37 CONTROL STATIOH eCi/Kd SAMPLE YR ANALYSIS

• TYPE SIZE HEAt) HIH 1983 C34 LLD 13 40'F00 < 60i00 iOe00 1983 C37 LLD 13 43.08 -

70.00 < 10o00 1983 I31 LLD 13 4$ .15 < 60i00 < 17.00 1983 K40 LI D 1300.00 < 1300+00 < 1300o00 1983 POSIT1VE LLD 10 3048+00 6000+00 900+00 3-46

fj TABLE 3-2i7 QUARTERLY TLD DATA

SUMMARY

BY YEAR 1

INDICATOR STATIONS pCi/CUBIC METER SAMPLE MAX YR ANALYSIS TYPE ...,.. SIZE MAX MIH STATION A

1982 TL POSITIVE 121 Oo23 Oo29 0>15 . 4u CONTROL STATIONS SAMPLE YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE MIH 1982 . Tl POSITIVE .4 0>20 0.23 Oo 11

/

INDICATOR STATIONS'EAH SAMPLE i

YR ANALYSIS;TYPE SIZE MAX STATION

~ &'W <<W 0 1983 TL POSITIVE 150 0.25 0.32 0.17 46 CONTROL STATIONS SAMPLE YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE MEAN MAX MIN 1983 TL POSITIVE 3 . Oi23 0.27 0 122

. 3-47

TABLE 3-2>8 ANNUAL TLD DATA SUMHARY BY YEAR INDICATOR STATIONS

S AHPLE rCi/CUBIC HETER HIH MAXTATION YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE HE AH HAX 1982 TL POSITIVE 28 Oo23 Oe29 0.20 4v CONTROL STATIONS SAMPLE YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE HAX 1982 TL POSITIVE Oi21 0 'l'7 0.21 INDICATOR STATIONS SAMPLE MAX YR ANALYSIS TYPE SIZE HAX HIH 8 TATIOH 1983 TL POSITIVE 45 Oi25 0.31 0.20 CONTROL'TATIONS SAMPLE YR AHALYSIS TYPE 'IZE MAX HIH 1983 TL - POSITIVE 0+22 0+23 0.21 3-48

3 0

I

\

J t

.]

i+J C

J P )

~-

4.0 COMMENTS AND TERMS PERTINENT TO DATA TABLES Specific preoperational data are presented in Tables 4-1.0 through 4-8.1. These tables which are arranged according to sample station, sample type and type of analysis are:consistent with the sample types outlined in Table 2-1.0 in Section.2.0.

The following abbreviations may appear in the data sets:

'I,P

~ al NS - Indicates no sample. collected '

SL - Indicates the sample was lost prior to analysis NA - Indicates sample, analysis lost by laboratory NR - Indicates that a result for the indicated analysis was not reported.

ND - Indicates that a result for an isotope was not reported. for this sample (through previously reported in similiar media).

'I L L

The change in the report of significant figures and the difference in LLD s,3'L values for data, effective July 1983, was due to the change in contract

'I I

.services as noted previously, in Section 2.0 in this report.

4.1 SAMPLE DEYIATIONS The following is a listing of the deviations/discrepancies from routine.

sample collection analysis'requency and/or sensitivity levels experienced during the preoperational program. Causes for the discrepancies are noted for all cases, as indicated in historical records; 1

I

" Air sample deviations:

11/8 - 11/15/82, Air sample unit at Station no sample was collected:

5 was out of order; 5/2 - 5/9/83 Air sample unit. at Station 23 was out of order; no sample was col)ected.

I 7/25 - '8/15/83 Construction, work 'at BPA White Bl'uffs..Substation .

requir'ed removal and rerouting .of power line to Station 5. No electrical service was available for three weeks and no sample was collected.

8/8 - 8/15/83, Constructi on/remodel ing of, the Petti tt barn at Station 40 disrupted power'.to sampler; no sample was collected.

11/14 - 12/12, Loss of power occurred at Station 7 due to breaks in buried line. Inclement weather prevented trenching and replacement of line for four weeks. No samples were collected during the outage.'-1

"9/26 - 10/10 Air sample unit malfunctioned, which resulted in a small sample volume being collected and analytical results higher than normal. (Small sample volumes result in decreased sensitivity of analysis.)

Soil Sam le Deviations:

5/13/83 A special Sr-90 soil analysis was requested.

Analysis was never completed.

uarterly TLD Deviations:

Supply System Data 1980 4th quarter, .

Area 4 heater controller of the reader unit malfunctioned. Only 3 TLD areas were used to determine exposure rate for each station.

1981 1st quarter, The TLD from Station 13 was damaged during readout, no data retrievable.

1981 2rtd quarter, TLD information from Station 9 was lost during processing due to machine malfunction.

1982 2nd quarter, Station 41 and 46 TLDs were missing.

No field dose for these locations available.

4 1982 3rd quarter, Station 47 field dose was determined from back-up area TL due to improper processing of primary TL areas.

Station 46 readings were lost during processing.

1983 1st quarter, A replacement TLD was put at station 43 fo~ 51 days. Original TLD missing.

1983 4th quarter, Station 42 TLD was missing. No field dose available.

Annual TLDs U. S. Testing Data 1979 Station 20 TLD missing.

1980 Station 14 TLD missing.

1981 Station 12 TLD missing.

Supply System Data 1980 Station 25 TLD missing.

1982 Station 15 and 41 TLDs were in the field less than 369 days (field period for all other TLDs for 1982) due to

. mixup with quarterly exchange TLDs. ~

1983 Station 19, 42 -and S-4 TLDs missing.

r PIC Monitor in Di screpancies:

No data reportable to date. -Multiple system failures and mal functions prevented accumulation and analysis of data.

Water Sam le Deviations 10/14/82 'tation 29 drinking water sample was never received by the 1 aboratory.

8/6/83 Station 26 and 27 water samples were not analyzed for Gross Beta.

9/14/83 quarterly Tritium analyses of drinking and surface water 1 ost during, processing.

9/14/83 Special Sr-90 analysis of Station 28 water never ~

corn pl e ted.

All-preoperation'al data for Station 52 (WNP-'2, Well 83) was obtained via the WNP-2 water quality/chemistry program conducted by U.S.

Testing, not as.a part of the REMP. However, this data provides

~

good baseline information 'for Station 52.

Sediment Sampl e Deviations 5/8/80 No downstream (Station 34) sediment analysis was reported.

5/14/82 Sediment sampl es were shipped but no report of analysis was received:

Milk Sam le Deviations:

4/26/82 All 4 milk samples were. lost in processing at laboratory.

Station 40 milk sample was destroyed during shipping. '/6/82

\

7/19/82 Station 35 milk sample was destroyed during shipping.

8/30/82 Station 35 milk sample was never received by laboratory.

'V 4-3

Fish Sam le Deviations:

10/29/79 Only one fish specimen was caught in the (normally 4 specimen are sent for analysis).

Columbia'River,'tation 30 4/26/81 Only two fish specimen were caught in Columbia River;:

Station 30 (normally 4 specimen are sent for analysis).

Garden Produce Sam le Deviations:

6/21/82 Station '9 and 37 sample volume were insufficient to achieve required sensitivity.

~

~

Table 4-1.0 ANALYSIS', GROSS BETA UNITS', Fci/M3 STATIOH DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 1 SEP 7t 1982 Oi03 o,oi 1 SEP 13r 1982 <Oioi 1 SEP 20t 1982 Oi 02 Oi Oi 1 SEP 27t 1982 Oo02 Oo 01.

1 OCT 4r 1982 Oooi Otoi 1= OCT 11r 1982 Oi04 Oioi OCT OCT HOV NOV

'.18r 1982 25t 1982 Sr 1982 1982 ,

Ot06 Oo03 0+03 0 i 04

~

Oioi Oi 01 Oioi '.01 HOV 15 t 1982 Oo06 ~ Oo 01 HO@ 22 t 1982. Qo03 0.01

.1 HOV 29t 1982 0<09 O,O1

'2

~

1 DEC '6r 1982 0 0.01 DEC '13t 1982 Ooio Oi02 DEC 20r 1982 Oo03 Oioi .

1 DEC 27r 1982 <0>01 1 JAH 3t 1983 Oo07 Oioi 1 JAH ior 1983 Oe04 Oooi 1 JAH 17r 1933 0'i 02 Oioi 1 J*H '24 r 1-983 0 05 Oroi 1 JAN 31r 1983 0.01 Oioi FEB 7t 1983 Oi04 0+01 1

FEB FEB 14t 1983 1983 0.02 0+01 0 '1 Oi01 FEB 28r 1983 Oi02 Oioi 1 , MAR 7r 1983 0 i 02 Oooi 1 MAR 14r 1983 Oioi Oioi 1 21r 1983 Oo02. 0+01 1 MAR 28t 1983 Oi03'+02 Oooi APR 4r 1983 0.01 1 APR 11r 1'983'983 0 i 03 Oioi 1 18r Oi07 Oioi

.1 APR 25t 1983 Oo02 Otoi MAY 2t 1983 . Oo04 Otoi

'1 MAY 9r 19S3 Oi02 Oioi 1 MAY ,16r 1983 Oo02 Oooi 1 MAY 23t 1983 Oo02 0+01 1 MAY 31r 1983 Oo04 Oooi JUH 6r 1983 0+01 Oroi JUH 13r 1983 Oi02 Oioi 1 JUH 20t 1983 Oioi Oioi 1 JUH 27r 1983 Oooi 0+01 JUL 5r 1'983 <0+005

Table 4-1.0 (continued.)

AIR GROSS BETA ANALYSIS'NITS'TATION r.C 1/M3 CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA JUL 1983 Ot008 Oi0034 JUL 18t 1983 Ot0049 0+0031 1 JUL 25t 1983, Ot025 0 t 00'4 1 AUG it 1983 Ot014 Ot003 1 AUG St, 1983 0+018 Oo004 AUG 15t 1983 0 i 017 Ot004 1 AUG 22t 19S3 Ot019 Ot004 1 AUG 29' 1983 0t02 Oi004 1 SEP 6t 1983 0t 015 0 i 003.

1 SEP 12t 1983 Ot014 Ot004 1 SEP 19t 1983 Ot018 Ot004 1 SEP 26t 1983 0.033 0.005 1 OCT 3t 1983 Ot022 Oi004 OCT 10t 1983 Ot019 Oo004 1 OCT 17r 1983 ,0 022 o Oi004

~

1 OCT 24r 1983 0+02 0+003 1 OCT 31 t 1983 Ot041 0 t 005.

1 HOV 7t 1983 Ot0058 Ot0021.

HOV 14t 1983 0+01 Oo002 NOV 2it 1983 'Ot0065 0+0021 1 HOV 28r 1983 Ot0093 Ot0024 DEC 51 1983 Ot043 0 F005 DEC 12r 1983 0.023 Oi003 DEC 19r 1983 Ot023 Ot003 DEC 27t 1,983, Ot036 Oi004 1 JAH 3t 1984 Ot048 0 F005 ~

1 JAH 9t 1984 Ot013 0 F003't003 1 JAH 16t 1984 'Ot017 4 MAR,29 r 1982 Ot02 Oi01 4' "'APR 5t 1982 <0+01 4 APR 12t 1982 Ot01 Ot01 4 APR 19>> 1982 <0+01 26t 1982 Ot02 Ot01 4 HAY 3 t 1982 Ot02 Ot01 4 HAY 10 1982 Ot01 Ot01 4 .MAY 17r 1982 Ot02 Oo01 4 MAY 24t 1982 Oo02 Ot01 JUH it 1982 Ot02 Ot01 Ot01 JUH 7r 1982 Ot01 JUH 14t 1982 Ot03 Oi01 JUH 21t 1982 Oi04 Ot01 JVH 28r 1982 Ot04 OtOi JUL 6t 1982 Ot01 0.01

Tab'te 4-1.0 (continued)

AIR ANALYSIS+ GROSS BETA r-Ci/M3 UNITS'TATIOH DATE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGMA 4 JUL 12t 1982 ;Oo05 oioa JUL 19r 1982 -Oi 03 Oroi 4 .JUL 26t 1982 0'i 03 Otoi AUG 2t 1982 ,': .Oi04 Oooi AUG '9t 1982 'Oo03 'Oioi 4 AUG 16r 1982 *

.0+01 oooa AUG 23t 1982 '.': 0+03 Otoi AUG 30 ' 1982  : 0+03 oioa 4 SEP t 1982 '"0 t 02 oooa 4 SEP 13't 1982 0)02 oioa SEP 20r 1982 Oo02 Otoi SEP 27r 1982 0 F 01 oeoa OCT 4t 1982 (oioa OCT iat 1982 Ot04 Ot01 OCT as't 1982 ,Oo 04 o,oa OCT 25t 1982 Oo03 oooa 4 HOV it 1982 Oo02 Otoa 4 HOV 8t 1982. oo03 0+01 HOV aFJ t 1982 Ot06 Otoi HOV 22t 1982 Oo02 Otoi HOV 29 ~ 1982 Oo09 oioa DEC 6t 1982 0 i 02 oioa

~ DEC 13t 1982 Oi 09 0.02 DEC 20t 1982 0.02 0.01 DEC 27t 1982 oooa o,oa JAH 3t 1983 Oo07 oioa JAH 10t 19.83 0 o'02 oooa JAil 17t 1983 Otoi oioa JAH 24t 1983 Oo04 Oroi JAN 31t 1983 oooa Oioa 7r 1983 Oi04 oioa 14r 1983 Oi 02 0+01 1983 oooa oooa 4 FEB 28r 1983 Oi02 o,oa 4 MAR 7t 1983 Oi02 0+01 4 MAR 14r 1983 0+01. 0+Oa 4 MAR 21r 1983 0+02 oooa MAR 28t 1983 Oi03 0+01 4 ~

APR 4t 1983 Oo02 oioa APR 11r 1983 0+02 oioa 4 APR 18t 1983 Oo03 oooa AFR 25t 1983 Oo02 oioa MAY 2t 1983 Ot03 o,oa MAY 9t 1983 0.01 oioa 4 7

Table 4-1.0 (continued)

AIR AHALYSIS: GROSS BETA UNITS+ r-C 1/M3 STATION CQHCEHTRAT ION TMO SIGMA 4 MAY 16t 1983 0+01 4 MAY 23r 1983 Ot02 Oipi 4 'AY 31t 1983 Oo04 0+01 4 JUH 6t 1983 Otpi 0.01 JUH 13t. 1983 0 i 01 0.01 JUH 20t 1'983 0tpi Otpi JUH 27r 1983 Otpi Otpi

'i03 4

4 JUL 5t 1'9 83 <Oi005 JUL 11t 1983 Oi0066 0 f 0033 JUL 18r 1983 0.0052 0.0031 JUL 25t 1983 Ot016 0. 0'04 AUG i.t . 1983 0.012 0 t 003" AUG ~ .8 f 1983 0 i 022 0.004 AUG 15f 1983 0.014 Oop04 4 AUG 22t 1983 pi015 Oi004 AUG 29t 1983 Oi018 0.004 4 SEP 6t 1983 Oi012 Oi003 SEP 12r 1983 Ot013 Ot004 SEP 19t 1983 Ot015 Ot004 SEP 26t 1983 Oi034 Ot005 OCT 3t 1983 Ot021 Oo004 OCT ipt 1983 Oe018 Ot004 OCT 17t 1983 0 '22 0+004 4 OCT 24r 1983 0 i 021 Ot003 OCT 3ir 1983 0.039 Pop04 HOU 7t 1983 Oi0065 0.0022 HOV 14t 1983 Ot0025 Ot0016 4 iHO<> 2it 1983 <Ot006 HOP 28r 1983 Ot0095 Oi0024 DEC 5t 1983 Ot04 Of004't003 DEC 12t 1983 Ot017 4 DEC 19r 1983 Ot023 Ot003 DEC 27t 1983 Ot037 Ot004 4 JAH 3t 1984 Ot04 Oi004 JAH 9t 1984, 0.015 0+003 JAH 16t 1984 't018 Ot003 5 MAR 29t 1982 Ot02 Otpi 5 APR 5r 1982 0+01 Oipi 5 APR 12t 1982 Ot03 Oipi 5 APR 19r 1982 <Otpi 5 APR 26r 1982 Oo03 Ot01 5 iMAY ~ 3 f 1982 pt04 Ptpi 5 MAY ipt 1982 0.01 Otpi

Tab1e 4-1.0 (continued)

AIR ANALYSIS: GROSS BETA UNITS o FCi/M3 h

~ 'h STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA I'

MAY 171 1982 Oo02 oiOa 5 MAY 241 1982 Oi02 0+01 5 JUN ar 1982 0 i.02 ~ oooa 5 JUN 71 1982 '102 Oo01 5 JUH a41 1982 Oi02 oioa 5 JUN 2ar 1982 0+03 Or01 5 JUN 281 1982 Oo03 oiOa JUL 61 1982 Oo02 0>01 JUL 12r 1982 Oo06 ooOa JUL 19r 1982 Oi02 oooa 5 'JUL 261 1982 Oo02 oiOa

-5 21 1982 Oi03 oiOa C'UG . AUG 91 1982 Or05 ooOa AUG 161 1982 0.01 oioa AUG 231 1982 0.02 oooa 5 AUG 301 1982 Oi02 Oi01 h 5 SEP 71 1,982 0+02 oo01 5 SEP 13r 1982 <oo01 5 SEP 20r 1982 <0101 5 SEP 271 1982 0 i 02 oooa 5 OCT 1982 <0 iOa

.,5 OCT 111 1982 Oi03 "Oi01 5 . OCT 181 1982 0.04 oioa O'..OCT 25t 1982 ,Oo02 0.01 5-" ir 1982 Oi02 0<01

-5 NOV 8r. 1982 0 F 03 0.01 HOV 151 1982 HS HO'V 221 1982 Oi03 0i01 HOV 291 1982 Oo07 oioa DEC 61 1982 oiOa oioa C'OV 5

5

'DEC 13r DEC 201 1982 1982 ooa3 Oi02 0<02 ooOa 5 I DEC 27 t 1982 0+ 01 0+01 5 JAN 31 1983 Oi07 0+01 5 JAH 101 1983 Or03 oiOa CJ JAN 171 1983 Or01 oiOa 5 JAH 241 1983 0 F03 ,O.o 01.

JAH 311 1983 Or01 Or01 71 1983 Oo03 oioa FER 141 1983 0 F 01 Or01 FEB 22t 1983 Or01 oi01 FEB 281 1983 O,oa oi01 5 MAR 71 1983 Oi02 ooOa 5 ~

MAR 14r 1983 oi01 Oi01

Table 4-1.0 (continued)

AIR AHALYSIS+ .. GROSS RETA UNITS i vCi/H3 STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGI'iA 1983 Ot02 O.o 01

~ C.

HAR 28r 1983 Ot02 0 F 01 5 APR 4r 1,983 "'o..oa 5 APR 11r 1983 Oo02 oioa 5 APR 18t 1983 Oo02 oioa

'5 APR 25 t 1983 0+02 oioa 5 HAY f 1983 Ot02 O.ol C

HAY 9 ~ 1983 oioa oioa 5 HAY 16r 1983 Ot02 0 ioa 5 HAY 23r 1983 0.01 oioa

~

5 3ir 1983 . Oe03 o.oa 5 JUH 6r 1983 oooa 0 F 01 5 JUH 13r 1983 Oooi oioa 5 JUH 20r 1983 <O.oa JUH 27 t 1983 Otoi oioa 5 JUL 5r 1983 <0+005 5 JUL 11r 1983 Oi0089 Oi0035 5 JUL 18r 1983 <0 004 F

5 JUL 1983 oooa5 Oi003 5 AUG 1983 Oi0095 Ot0031 5 AUG Sr 1983 0.017 0 i 004 C

AUG 15 t 1983 Ot015 ,0. 004 5 AUG 22r 1983 0.015. 0'i 004 5 AUG 29r 1983 oioa8 0 i 004 5.'5 SEP 6r 1983 ., Ot0086 0.0026 SEP 12t 1983 ~ 0.012 Oi004 5 ' SEP,19r 1983 'O.i,012 0 F003 5 26r 1983 0+025 Oo004 OCT 3t 1983 Oioa3 Oo003 5 OCT 10r 1983 oioa6 Oo004

. 5 OCT 17r 1983 oooa6 Ot004 5 OCT 24r 1983 Oioa9 Oo003 5 OCT 31 r 1983 Oi 032 Oo004 5 HOV 7r 1983 Ot0064 0+0021 HOV a4r 1983 Oi0076 Oo002 5 HOV 2ir 1983 0 '045 Oi0019 HOV 28r 1983 Oo0047 Oo0021 5 DEC 5t 1983 Ot034 0.004 5 DEC 12r 1983 Oioa3 Oi002 5 DEC 19r 1983 Oioa7 Oi003 5 DEC 27 t 1983 0+041 0 F005 5 JAil 3 t a984 Ot036 0+004 5 JAH 9r 1984 Ot008 Oo0024 5 JAH 16r 1984 Ot02 Oi003 4-10

Table 4-1.0 (continued)

AIR ANALYSIS l GROSS BETA UNITS: r-Ci/M3 STATION CONCEHTRATIOH TMO SIGMA 29t 1982 Oi02 Oo01 6 APR 5r 1982 (oioa APR 12 t 1982 Oi02 Oo Oi APR 19r 1982 <0+01 APR 26r 1982, Oi02 .Oo Oi MAY 3r 1982 Oo03 - ....Oi 01 MAY 10r 1982 Or01 Oo 01 HAY 17r 1982 Or02 oiOa MAY 24t 1982 ,.

'Oo 02 oioa JUN 1982 0.02 0.01

. JUN 7t 1982 Oi02 Oi Ol 6 JUH 14t 1982 0>02 Oo 01 6 JUH 2lr 1982 0.04 Oo 01 6 JUN 28r ~

1982 0.02 0.01 6 JUL ~ br 1982 0.03 0.01 6 JUL 12r 1982 Oo05 Oo01 JUL 19r 1982 Oo02 Oo01 6 JUL 26r 1982 0.01 Or01 AUG 2t 1982 Or04 Or01 AUG 1'982 ooOa oooa AUG 16t 1982 Oi02 oioa 6 AUG 23 f 1982 0+02 0+01 6 AUG 30t 1982 Oi03 o,oa 6 SEP 7r 1982 Oi02 0 F 01 6 SEP 13t 1982 <ooOa 6 SEP 20r 1982 0+03 ooOa 6 SEP 27t 1982 Oo02 o.oa 6 OCT 4r 1982 oooa 0+01 6 OCT lir OCT 18t 1982 1982

.0o03 0+05 oiOa 0.01 6

6 OCT 25r 1982 Oo02 Oi01 6 NOV ir 1982 Or02 oi01 HOU 8t 1982 Oo04 oo01 HOV 15 f 1982 Oi07 oo01 HOV 1982 <oiOa HOV 29t 1982 . 0+la Oo02 DEC br 1982 o,oa Or01 6 DEC 13t 1982 Ori2 0+02 6 DEC 20t 1982 Oo03 Or01 6 27r 1982 Oi01 0+01 6 JAH 3r 1983 0 i 07 Or01 6 JAH 10t 1983 Oi03 0.01 6 JAN 17r 1983 Or01 0+01 6 JAH 24r 1983 Oi04 0+01 4-11

Tab1e 4-1.0 (continued)

AIR ANALYSISl GROSS BETA UNITS > sCi/M3 STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGMA JAH 31>> 19S3 0>01 0>01

66 FEB 71 1983 0+05 0>01

'6 FEB 141 1983 0>02 0+01 6 FEB 22>> 1983 0>01 0>01 6' FEB 28>> 1983 0>02 0>01 MAR 7t 1983 1983 0>02

<0>01 0 '1 6 MAR 141 6 211 1983 0>03 0>01 6 MAR 281 1983 0.03 0+01 6 APR 41 1983 0.01 0.01 6 APR ilr APR 18i 1983 19S3

~

0>03 0.03 0>01 0'01 6

6 6

APR 25 1 I<AY 1983 1983 0>03 0 06

~

0 '1 0>02 6 MAY 1983 0>(2 0>01 6 MAY 161 1983 0>02 0>01 6 MAY 23 t 1983 0>02 0>01 6 MAY 311 1983 0.> 03 '0>01 6 JUH 61 1983 0.01 0>01

~ 6 JUN 13>> 1983 0+01 0>01 6 JUH 201 1983 0>01 0>01 6 JUH 271 1 9'83 0.01 0>01 6' JUL 5t 1983 <0>005

.JUL 11r 1983 0>0082 0.0034 6 JUL 181 1983 0>0038 0>003 6 JUL 251 19S3 0>014 0>003 6 AUG 11 1983 HS 6 AUG 8>> 1983 HS 6 AUG 151 1983 . HS 6 AUG 22t 1983 0>015 0>006 6 AUG 291 1983 0>019 0>004 6 SEP 61 1983 0+013 0>003 6 121 1983 0>0089 0>0035

.6 191 1983 0>014 0>004 6 261 1983 . 0>03 0>004 6 OCT 31 1983 0>018 0>004 6 OCT 101 1983 0>022 0>004 6 OCT 171 1983 0>023 0>004 6 OCT 24r 1983 0>021 0>003 6 OCT 311 1983 0>039 0>004 6 HOV 71 1983 0>0084 0>0023 6 HOU 14r 1983 0.0089 0>002 6 HOP 1983 0>0076 0>0021 6 HOV 281 1983 O.OOSS 0.0024 4-12

Table 4-1.0 (continued)

AIR ANALYSIS: GROSS B'ETA UHITS: r Ci/M3 STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 6 DEC 5t 1 5'83 'Ot 033 0t 004, 6 DEC 121 15'83 Ot017 Ot003 6 'EC 19r 1983 0i019 Oi003 6 DEC 27 t 1983 Oi037 Ot004 6 JAH 3t 1984 Ot042 Ot005 6, JAH 5'r '1984 Oo0098 Ot0025 "

6 JAH 16r 1984 oo016 Ot003 7 AUG 16r 19S2 Oo02 0iOa 7 AUG 23 1982 Oi02 OiOi 7 AUG '0r 1982 Ot03 0+01 7 SEP 7 r 1982 Ot02 oiOa-7 SEP a3r 19S2 <0+01 7 SEP 20r 1982 0.01 O,oa 7 SEP 27r 1982 0.01 0.01 7 OCT 4t 1982 <ooOa 7 OCT iir 1982 Ot04 Ot01 7 OCT 1st 1982 Oi05 oooa 7 OCT 25r 1982 Ot04 Ot01 7 HOV ar 1982 Oi03 oooa 7 HOV 8r 19S2 Ot05 Oi01 7 HOV 15r 1982 Oi06 Ot01 7 'HO V 22t 1.982 0.03 oooa 7I HOV 29r 1982 ooai 0'1 7 DEC 6r 1982 oi01 Ot01 7 DEC 13r 1982 Ot06 oooa 7 DEC 20r 15'82 '+05, 0 t.01 7 DEC 27t a582 Ot01 oioa 7 JAH 3t 1983 0+06 0.01 JAH 10r 1 5'83 0 i 04 oooa 7 JAH 17r 15'83 oioa oooa 7 JAH 24r 15'83 Ot03 oooa 7 JAH 31r 15'83 Ot01 Ot01 7 FEB 7t 1983 Ot05 Ot01 7 FEB 14r 1983 Ot02 0.01 7 FER 22r 1983 Ot01 Ot 01 7 FER 28r 1983 Ot01 Ot01 7 MAR 7t 15'83 Oi02 Ot01 7 MAR 14r 1983 <Ot01 7 MAR 21t 15'83 0+02 Ot01 7 MAR 28r 1983 Ot04 Ot01 7 APR 4r 15'83 Or01 Ot01 7 APR ai 1983 0+04 Oi01 7 APR 1st 1 5'83 Oi03 Ot01 4-13

Table 4-1.0 (continued)

A'I R AHALYSIS+ GROSS BETA UHITSe 1 Ci/M3 STATIOH DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA APR 25 1983 Ot02 oooa 7-, 'MAY MAY

't 1983 Oe02 0toi 7 1983 Oo02't03 0+oa

7. MAY 161 1983 Otoa 7 MAY 23 1 1983 Ot03 oooa 7 I'IAY 31r 1983 Ot05 . oioa 7 JUH 61 1983 oooa 0+01 7 JUH 131 1983 Otoi oioa 7 JUH 201 1983 oooa o.oa JUH 27t 1983 Otoa Otoi 7 JUL 51 1983 <0 005 F

7 JUL 111 1983 0.0082 0.0034 7 'JUL 181 1983 0.003 0.-0029 7 JUL 251 1983 0.03 ~

0.004 7 a.. 1983 0+012 Ot003 7 AUG 81 1983 ot02 oi004

.7'UG 7

7.

AUG 151 AUG 221 1983 1983 Oo021 0+017 Os004 Ot004 AUG 291 1983 0.025 Ot004 61 1983 Ot014 Ot003 7 SEP 121 1983 oooaa Oi004 7 SEP 191 1983 0 '15 0.004

7. SEP 261 1983 Oo038 Ooo05 7 OCT 31 1983 0.025 Oo004

'7 OCT 101 1983 0t021 0>004 7 OCT 171 1983 Oi02 Ot004 7 OCT 241 1983 0,019 Ot003 7 ...OCT 311 1983 Oi038 0+004 7: ..'HO V 71 1983 Oi0069 0 t 0022 7 ',,HOV 141 1983 Otoi Ot003 7.HOU 211 1983 HS 7.': HOV 281 1983 HS

,7: ~

DEC 5t 1983 HS 121 1983 HS 7 ',,DEC 191 1983 . Ot022 Oo003

-;:: .7

~

DEC 271 1983 Ot037 Oo004 7 JAH 31 1984 Ot043 Ot005

~

7 JAH 91 1984 0+017 0+003 JAN 161 1984 Oo019 Oo003 I:

8 8

MAR APR 291 1982 51 1982 0 '2 Otoi osoa Otoi 8 APR 121 1982 Ot02 oioa 191 1982 <oooa

Table 4-1.0 (continued)

AIR

~\

ANALYSIS: GROSS BETA UNITS: r-Ci/N3 STATION CON CEHTRATIOH TMO SIGNA 8 APR 261 1982 Ot02 Otoi 8 klAY 31 1982 Ot02 0+01 HAY iot 1982 Otoi Oioi.

8 HAY 171 1982 Oo02 Otoi 8 HAY 241 1982 oo02 0.01;;:

8 JUN 11 1982 Ot02 Otoi 8 JUN 7t 1982 Ot02 Otoi 8 JUN 141 1982 'Ot02 otoi 8 JUH 211 1982 0 t03 O.O1 8 JUH 281 1982 Ot03 0.01 8 JUl 61 1982 Ot02 'Oi 01 8 JUL 121 1982 0.04 0+01 8 JUL 191 1982 0>02 0.01 8 JUL 26t 1982 Oi02 0+ 0 1 AUG 2t 1982 Ot05 0.01 8 AUG 91 1982 Otoi Otol 8 AUG 161 1982 Otoi Ot01 8

8 AUG 23 1 AUG 301 SEP 7t 1982 1982 Ot02

't03 Oo03

'toi Ot01 0+01 8 1982'982 8 SEP 131 Oo02 Oooi SEP 201 1982 Otoi 0+01 SEP 27 t 1982 Ot03 Oooi 8 OCT 41 1982 <0.01 8 OCT 111 1982 Oo03 Oooi "

8 OCT 181 1982 0+05 Otoi OCT 25t 1982 Ot05 Oooi 8 HOV it 1982 Ot03 Oooi Oioi 8 HOV 81 1982- Ot05 8 HOV 151 1982 Ot05 0toi 8 HOV 221 1982 Oi03 Oioi

, 8 iNOV 291 1982 Oif2 Ot02 8 DEC 61 1982 Ot02 Oi Oi 8 DEC 131 1982 Otii Oi02 8 DEC 20'1 1982 Oi02 Oooi 8 DEC 27 1 1982 Oo Oi. Ot01 8 JAH 3f 1983 Ot07 Otoi 8 JAH 101 1983 Ot03 Otoi 8 JAN 171 1983 Otoi Ot01 8 JAN 241 1983 Ot03 Otoi 8 JAH 311 1983 Ot02 Oioi 8 FEB 7t 1983 Oi03 Otoi 8 FEB 141 1983 Oooi Otoi 8 FEB 221 1983 0+01 Oiol

Tab1e 4-1.0 (continued)

AIR AHALYSISl GROSS BETA UHITS: r Ci/M3 STATIOH CON CEHTRATIOH TMO SIGMA I

8 1983 Oeoi '

0eoi 8 HAR 7t 1'983 Oe02 e 0 1.

8 MAR 14) 1983 0' 01 Oeoi 8 HAR 21) 1983 Oe02 Oeoa 8 HAR,28 t 1983 Oe02 Oeoi 8 APR 4r 1983 Oeoi 0.01 APR ait 1983 Oeoi Oeoi APR 18r'5 1983 Oe04 Oeoi APR t 1'983 Oe02 Oeoi HAY 2) 1983 Oe02 Oeoa 8 HAY 9) 1983 Oeoi Oeoa 8 HAY 16) 1983 0.02 0 01 F

23) 1983 Oeoa 0 oa

~

8 MAY 31r 1983 0.03 Oe01, 8 JUH 6) 1983 Oeol Oeol 8 JUH 13) 1983 Oeoi Oeoi 8 JUH 20) 1983 Oe01 Oeoi 8 JUH 27r 1983 0eoi Oeoi" JUL .5) <Oe005 JUL.iir 1983 0 e 0095 Oe0035 8 JUL 18) 1983 Oe0043 o,oo3a 8 JUL 25t 1983 Oe016 Oe004 8 AUG it 1983 Oe012 0.003 8 AUG 8r a983 Oeoa6 Oe003 8 ..AUG -15) 1983 .0 e Oib... ..0. 004 8 AUG 22) 1983 Oe'016. 0 .'004 AUG 29) 1983 Oe021 Oe004 SEP 6) 1983 Oe011 Oe003 8 SEP 12) 1983 Oe0066 Oe0032 8 SEP 19) 1983 Oe012 Oe003 8 SEP 26) 1983 Oe03 Oe004 8 OCT 3) 1983 0'e 016 Oe004 8 OCT 10) 1983 Oe014 Oe003 8 OCT 17) 1983 Oe02 Oe004 8 OCT 24) 1983 Oe017 Oe003 8 OCT 31r 1983 Oe039 Oe004 8 HOV 7r 1983 Oe0068 Oe0022 8 HO <) 14) 1983 Oeoi Oe002 8 HOV 21) 1983 Oe0045 Oe0019 8 HOV 28) 1983 Oe0096 Oe0024 8 DEC 5t 1983 Oeo32 Oe004 8 DEC 12) 1983 0 02 F Oe003 8 DEC 19) 1983 0.021 Oe003 DEC 27r 1983 Oe042 Oe005

Table 4-1.0 (contlnued)

AIR t;. ANALYSISi UHITS1 GROSS r-Ci/M3 BETA STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGHA 8 JAH 3 ~ 1984 Ot044 Ot005 8 JAH 9t 1984 Ot012 Ot003 8 JAH 16t 1984 '0 t 019 Ot003 9 HAR 29r 1982 Ot02 Otol 9 APR 5t 1982 <Otol 9 APR 12t 1982 Otoi 0toi 9 APR 19t 1982. <o.oa 9 APR 26t 1982 Oo02 Otoi HAY 3t 1982 Ot02 . Oto1 9 HAY iot 1982 oioa 0~01 9 HAY 17t 1982 '0. 01 Oooi HAY 24t 1982 0.01 Otoi JUH lt 1982 Ot02 0.01 9 JUH 7t f982 Otol 0.01 9 JUH 14r 1982 Ot02 o.oa JUH 21r 1982 Ot03 Otoi JUH 28t 1982 Oi03 Oioi.

JUL 6r 1982 oioa oioa JUL 12t 1982 Ot03 oooa JUL 19 r 1982 Oi02 Otol'toi JUL 26t 1982 Ot03 AUG 2t 1982 Oo02 0+01 AUG 9t 1982 oooa Otol AUG 16r 198~7

~ oioa oooa AUG 23 t. 1982 Ot02 0'01 9 AUG 30r 1982 Ot03 Otoi 9 SEP 7t 1982 0'o 02 oioa 9 sEp 13t 1982 Ot02 Otoi SEP 1982 Ot03 Otoi SEP 27t 1982 oioa Otoi OCT 4t 1982 oioa 0 o'01 OCT air 1982 Oi03 0t OCT 1st 1982 01.'Ot01 Ot04 HO'V'0r OCT 25 1 1982 Ot03 oioa HOV it 1982 Ot03 oioa 8r 1982 Ot04 '+01 HOV'5t 1982 Ot07 Otoi HOP 22r 1982 <Otoi NOV 29t 1982 Ot06 Otoi DEC 6r 1982 Oi02 0+01 DEC 13r 1982 Oo04 oooa DEC 20r 1982 Ot02 .Otoi DEC 27t 1982 Otoi oioa

Tab1e 4-1.0 (continued)

AIR ANALYSISe GROSS BETA UNITS e I Ci/M3 STATION CONCENTRATION TMO SI GMiA 9 JAH 31 1983 Oe05 Oeoi 9 JAN 101 1983 Oe02 Oeoi 9 JAH 171 1983 Oe01 Oeoi 9 JAN 241 1983 Oe03 Oeoi

~

JAH 311 1 9'83 Oeoi Oeoi 9' FEB 7t 1983 Oe03 Oeoi

'9 FEB 141 1983 <.0 e Oi 9 FEB .) '1 1983 Oeol Oe01 FEB 281 1983 Oe02 0.01 MAR 71 1983 oe02 Oe01 9 MAR 141 1983 Oeoi 0.01 9 MAR 211 1983 0.02 0.01 MAR 281 1983 Oe02 Oe01.

APR 41 1983 0.01 Oeoi 1983 Oeol 0eoi 9 APR 181 1983983 Oe03 Oeoi 9 APR ~51 Oe02 O,O1

9. MAY,. 21 1983 'e02 Oeoi 9.1 1983 Oeoi Oeoi MAY 161 1083 Oe02 Oeoi MAY 231 1983 Oe02 Oeoi MAY 311 1983 Oe03 0.01 9 JUH 61 1983 Oeoi 0.01 9 JVH 131 1983 Oeoi Oeol JUH 20 i 1983 Oeoi Oeoi 9 JUN 27 t 1983 0 F 01 Oeoi JUL 51 1983 <Oe005 9 JUL 111 1983 Oe0053 Oe0032 9 JUL 181 1983 Oe0042 0 e003 9 JUL 25 1 1983 Oeoi5 Oe003 9 AUG 11 1983 Oe0079 Oe003 AUG 81 1983 Oe015 Oe003 9 AUG 151 1983 Oe014 Oe004 9 AUG 22 1 1983 0 '15 ,Oe004 9 AUG 291 1983 Oeoi5 Oe004 SEP 61 1983 Oeoi2 Oe003 9 SEP 12 t 1983 Oe0086 Oe0034 SEP 191 1983 0eoii Oe003 9 SEP 261 1983 Oe024 Oe004 9 OCT 31 1983 Oe018 0.004 OCT 101 1983 Oe014 Oe004 OCT 171 1983 0eoi9 Oe004 OCT 241 1983 0e 015 Oe002 OCT 311 1983 Oeo~~ Oe003 4-18

...h Table 4-,1.0 (continued)

L:

AIR'HALYSIS:

GROSS BETA UHITSo vci/M3 STATIOH DATE CON CEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA "HOV 7>> 15'83 0>>0056 Oi0021 9 HOU 14>> 15'83, 0>>0088 0>>002 9 HOV 21r 1983 0>>0031 oooo}8 HOV 28>> 1983 0>>0077. Oi0023 5>> 1983 0>>028 0>>003 0+0}7 0>>003 9

'ECDEC 12>> 1983 h 9 DEC 19>> 15'83 0>>017 Oi0'03 9 DEC 271 15'83 oo03} '>>004 9 JAH 3>> 1984 Oi037 0>>004 JAH 5'r 15'84 0>>011 0>>003 9 JAH 16>> 1984 0>>015 0>>002 2} SEP 7>> 1982 0 i 02 Oio}

21 SEP 13>> 1982 0>>01 0'e 01 21 SEP 20>> 15'82 0.03 0>>01 SEP 27>> 1 5'82 0>>02 0>>01 21 OCT 4r 1982 <0>>01 21 OCT i}r 1982 Oi04 0>>01 Ooo}.'.

OCT 18r 1982 0>>06 21 OCT 251 1982 0>>04 Oi01 21 21 HOV HOV lt 8>>

1982 5'82 0>>03'o05 0+0}

0>>01 1

HOU 15 t 15'82 0>>08 o.oa HOV 22 1982 0>>03 0.01 I hh 7} HOV '>> 15'82 0.08 0~0}

I.

21 DEC 1982 Oi02 octo}

21 DEC 13>> 1982 . 0+08 0>>02 21 DEC 20>> 15'82 0>>03 o.oa

'h 21 DEC 27>> 1 5'82 0>>01 0>>0}

21 JAH 3t 1983 0>>06 oioa 21 JAH ior 15'83 0>>03 0 ~ 01 21 JAH 17>> 1983 0>>01 oooa 21 JAH 24>> 1983 0>>03 0+0}

21 JAH 31>> 1983 0>>01 0>>01 21 FEB .7>> 1983 0>>05 0>>01 21 FEB 14>> 1983 . 0>>01 0>>01

)a FEB'22>> 1983 <0>>01 21 28>> 1983. 0>>02 0>>01 21 7>> 15'83 0>>02 0>> 01 21 14>> 1983

"'>>01 0>>01'>>02 2} 21>> 1983 Oioa MAR 28>> 1983 0>>03 octo}

21 APR 4>> 1983 Oioi 0>>01 1983 0>>02 0>> 01 L,O 4-19

Tab1e 4-1.0 (continued)

AIR ANAL.YSIS: GROSS BETA UNITS o rCi/M3 STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH T4IO SIGMA 21 APR 181 1983 Oo03 Oooi 21 APR 25 t 1983 Oo02 Oooi 21 ,MAY 2t 1983 Oo03 O.O1 21 HAY 9t 1983 Oo02 Oooi 2f MAY 161 'f 983 Oo02 Oooi 21 MAY 231 1983 Oool Oooi 21 MAY 31t 1983 Oo02 0.01 Pf JUN 6r 1983 0:o 01 Oooi 21 JUH 131 1983 Oooi 0.01 JlJN 201 1983 Oooi'ooi 0 F 01 21 JUN 27r 1983 0.01 21 JUL 5t 1983 <Oo005.

2.1 JUL 1 1'1 1983 Oo0071 0.0033 21 JUL 181 1983 0.0039 Oooo3 21 JUL 251 1983 'ooi6 Oo004 21 AUG ir 1983 Oo0093 Oo0031

'121. AUG.

AUG 81 15 1 1983 1983 1983 Oo016 Oo012 Oo016 Oo004.

Oo003 Oo004 AUG 221 21 AUG 29r 1983 0o0.19 . Oo004 SEP 6r 1983 . Oooi3 Oo003 2} SEP 12r 1983 Oo0071 Oo0033 21 SEP 191 1983 Oooii Oo003 2f SEP 26r 1983 Oo032 oo005 21 OCT 31 1983 Oo041 Oo009 2f OCT ior 1983 Oo057 O.o 012 2f OCT 171 1983 Oo023 Oo004 21 21 OCT OCT 241 311 1983 1983 0 '2 Oo04 Oo003 Oo004 21 NOV 7t 1983 Oo0077 Oo0022 21 HOV 141 1983 Oo0086 Oo002 21 NOV 211 1983 Oo0057 Oo002 21 HOV, 281 1983 Oo0065 Oo0022 .

DEC 51 1983 Oo038 Oo004 21 DEC 121 1983 0 o 01'6 0 o.003 21'1 DEC 191 1983 Oo013 Oo002

.'DEC 27t 1983 Oo026 Oo003 2f JAH 31 1984 'o024 Oo003 21 JAH 91 1984 O,O1 h Oo003 21 JAN 161 1984 0 o.o 1 6 Oo003

.23 SEP 71 1982 -Oo03 0.01

"/ 23 SEP 131 1982 '<0 o 0 1 23 SEP 201 1982 Oo03 Oo01:

Tab1e 4-1.0 (continued)

• Ik

-0 ANALYSIS:

UNITS'TATION GROSS r-Ci/M3 BETA DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 23 SEP 27 r 1982 Oi02 0+01 OCT 4r 1'982 <oooa OCT 11t 1982 Oo04 oioa OCT 18r 1982 0+03 oooa 23 OCT 25t 1982 Oo04 Oroi 23 HOV lr 1982 Oo03 Oroi 23 HOV Sr 1982 Oo07 0.03 23 NOV 15l 19S2 Or08 0+01 23 HOV ~~PO r 1982 Oi03 o,oa 23 HOV 1982 0+07 . pool 23 . DEC 6t 1982 pi 02 oooa 23 DEC 13>> 1982 Oi07 0.02 P3 ,AP r 1982 Pi03 Oroi 23 DEC 27r 1982 0.01 0+01 23 JAH 3r 1983 Oi07 oooa 23 JAH lpr 1983 Oi03 0.01 23, JAH a7t 1983 oioa oioa l.~

~ 23 23 a

23 JAH 24r JAH 31r FEB 7f FEB 14r FEB 22 1 1983 1 98,3 1983 1983 19S3 Or05

. Or01 Or05 0+02

'oioa oooa Orol oioa oioa 23 FEB 28r 1983 Oo02 Orpl MAR 7r 1983 0 F 02 0.01 HAR 14r 1983 <oooa MAR 21t 1983 0.02 Oroa 23 MAR 28r 1983 Oo03 0+ 01'rol APR 4r 1983 Oo02 23 23 AFR lit APR 18r 1983 1983 Oo03 Or04 0+01 0 ~ 01 23 APR 25 t 1983 0 i 02 oooa 23 HAY 2r 1983 oioa oioa 23 MAY 9r 1983 HS 23 MAY 16r '1983'983 0 o,03 o,oa 23 HAY 23r 0+02 Oroa 73 MAY 3ir 1983 Oi04 oooa JUH 61 1983 0+02 oioa 23 JUH 13r 1983 oioa oioa 23 JUH 20t 1983 oioa Orol 23 JUN 27r 1983 0+01 oioa JUL 5t 1983 <Oi005 P3 l JUL .'l r 1983 0+0066 pi 0033 L' 23 JUL 18r 1983 Oi0034 pi 003 23 JUL 25 r 1983 0+022 Or004 Li 4-21

Table 4-1.0 (continued)

AIR ANALYSIS i GROSS BETA UNITS'o r-Ci/H3 STATION CON CEHTRATIOH TWO SIGH*

AUG ir 1983 . Or015 Oi 004 23 AUG Sr 1983 Or018 Or004 23 AUG 15t 1983 Or012 0 o.003 23 ~ AUG 22r 1983 Oi017 0.004 23 AUG 29r 1983 0r018 Oi004 23 SEP 6t 1983 oioia Oi003 23 SEP 12r 1983 o.oaa Or004 23 SEP 19r 1983 Oroii Or003 SEP 2hr 1983 Or031 Oo004

~

Ae)~

%5 OCT 31 1983 Oi024 0+004 OCT aor 1983 0+02 0r004

~Je OCT 17r 1983 0.019 ~ Oo004

23. OCT 1983 0(02 0.003 24 OCT 3lr 1983 Oe044 0.005 HOV 7 'r 1983 Or0054 Or0021 23 80V 14r 1983 0 'Ol Or002 23 HOV 21r 1983 Or0048 Or002 HOV 28r 1983 0+008 Or0023 23 DEC .5r 1983 Or034 0>004 23 DEC, 12t 1983 Or021 0+003 DEC 19r 1983 Or017 0.003 DEC 27r 1983 0.04 0.004 23 JAH 3r 1984 0 i 043 0 F 005 Q3 JAH 1984 Oi014 0. 003..

23 JAH iht 1984 Oroih Or003 40 JAN 31r 1983 Oi02 ,0 ioi 40 FEB 71 1983 Or04- Oroi 40 FER 14r 1983 Oroi Or 01 40 FEB 22 t 1983 oooa 0.01 40 28r 1983 Or02 Oroi 40 HAR 7r 1983 Orol Oroi 40 MAR 14r 1983 <oioa 40 HAR'1 r 1983 Or02 Oroa 40 1983 Orol Orol 40 APR 4r 1983 Oroi Oroi 40 40 APR lir APR 18t 1983'983 Or02 Or03 Oroi o,oa 40 APR 251 1983 Or02 Oroi 40 HAY 1983 Or03 Oroi 40 MAY 9r. 1983 Orol oioa

. 40 MAY '16 r 1983 0.03 0+01 40 MAY 23r 1983'983 Or02 0.01 40 MAY 31r Oi04 Orol 4

able 4-1.Q continued)

AIR

( ANALYSIS:

UNITS l GROSS r-Ci/M3 BETA STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 40 JUH 6r 1983 Otoa '0+01 40 JUH 13r 1983 oioa oioa 40 JUH 20t 1983 oioa oioa 40 JUN 27t 1983 0 t 01 0+01 40 JUL 5t 1983 <Oi005 40 40 JUL JUL iir 1st 1983 1983 Oi0098

<Oo004 0+0036 40 JUL 25t 1983 Oi015 Oi003 40 AUG '1t 1983 0.014 0.003 40 AUG 81 1983 Oi02 Oi004

,40 AUG 15r 1983 NS 40 'UG 221 1983 Oo02. ,0 i 004 40 AUG 29t 1983 oioa9 Oi 004 40 SEP 6t 1983 oooa3 0.003 40 SEP 12t a9s3 0.011 Oo004 40 19r 1983 0i016 Oi004 40 26t 1 983'983 Oi 032 Oo005 OCT '3 r oioa7 Oi004 40 OCT 1or 1983 oioa6 Pi004 40 OCT 17r 1983 Oiois Oi004 40 ~ I OCT 24> 1983 oioa9 0+003 OCT 31r 1983 0+037 0+004 40 HOU 7r '983 0.0047 Oo002 40 NOU 14t 1983 Oo0084 0.002 40 HOU 21t 1983 0 '054 0+002 40 HOU 28t 1983 Oooos Oo0023 40 DEC 5t 1983 'o029 Oo003 40 DEC 12 '983 Oi02 0'i 023 0.003 40 DEC 19r .1983 Oi003 40 DEC 27r 1983 0+045 Oi005 40 JAH 3r 1984 Oi047 0(005 40 JAN 9t 1984 o.oa4 Oi003 40 JAN 16t.1984 o.oas Oo003 48 FEB 7f 1983, Oi05 oioa 48 FEB 14r 1983 Oo02 0001 48 FEB 22t 1983 Otoi oioa 48 FEB 28r 1983 Oo02 oioa

'48 MAR 7r 1983 oioa oioa 48 MAR 14 r -1,'983 0 i 02 oioa 48 MAR 21t 1983 oooa oioa 48 MAR 28r 1983 Oi02 oioa 48 APR 4r 1983 0 F 02 0.01 48 APR 11r 1983 Oo02 oioa

able'-1.0 continued)

AIR AHALYSIS) 'ROSS BETA UNITS) r-Ci/H3'ATE STATIOH COHCEHTRATIQH- TWO SIGNA

(

48 APR 18~ 1983 0 <04 0)01 48 APR 251 1983 0 ) 0'2 0)01 4 G.'8 HAY 2f 1983 0 ) 03 0)01 NAY 9~ 1983 0,) 01 0)01 48 HAY 16~ , 1983 0)02 0) 0'1 .

48 lkAY 23 t 1983 0)02 0 . Oii 48 HAY 31~ 1983 0)04 0)01 48 'JUH 6~ 1983 0)01 0)01 48 JUH 13~ 1983 0)01 0)01 48 JUH 20'7~ 1983 0)01 0.01 48 JUH 1983 0.01 0)01 48 JUL .5 r 1983 <0)005 48 JUL 111 1983 0.013 0)004 48 JUL- 18r 1983 0) 005. 0.0031

.48 JUL 25~ 1983 ~ . 0)015 0) 003 ~

48 AUG 1~ 1983 ...0) 011 0)003 48 AUG 8~ . 1983 .0)017 0)004 48 AUG 1983' 0)018 0)004 48 22 ~

15'UG 1983 O)018 0)004 48 .AUG 29 ~ 1983 ')022 0)004 48 SEP 6r 1983 0)013 0)003'.004 48 SEP 12~ 1983 0)012 48 SEP 19~ 1983 0) 012. 0)003 48 SEP 26~ 1983 0) 034 0)005 48 QCT 3f 1983 0)018 0)004 48 QCT 10r 1983 0)018 O)004 48 QCT 17~ 1983 0)024 0)004 48 QCT 1983 0)016 0 ),003 48 31~

24'CT 1983 0)039 0)004 48 HQV 7~ 1983 0)0079 0.0022 48 HQV 14~ 1983 0)0092 0)002 48 HQV 2ir 1983 0)0048 0)0019 48 HQV 28~ 1983 0)0098 0)0024 48 DEC 5f 1983 0)042 0.005 48 DEC 12~ 1983 0)023 0)003 48 DEC 19~ 1983 0)025 .0.003 48 DEC 27 f 1983 0)043 0)005 48 JAH 31 1984 0)04 0)004 48 JAH 9~ 1984 0)017 0)003 48 JAH 16~ 1984 0)02 0)003 57 DEC 51 1983 0)032 0 ~ 004 57 DEC 12~ 1983 0.019 0)003 57 DEC 19r 1983 0.019 0)003 4-24

Tab1e 4-1.0 (continued)

AIR ANALYSISi GROSS BETA UHI TS: r-C i/M3 STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 57 DEC 27 ~ 1983 0.038 0>004

.57 JAH 3~ 1984 Oi038 Oe004 57 JAH 9~ 1984 Oi019'i 0+003 57 JAH 16~ 1984 017 Oi003 4-25

Table 4-1.1 AIR ANALYSIS: BERYLLIUH -7 UNITS: eCi/M3 STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TMO SIGNA 1 SEP 26r 1983 Oo062 0 o 018 1 JAH 3r 1984 Oo046 Oo02 4 SEP 26r 1983 Oo044 Oo019 4 JAH 3r 1984 '<0 o 04 5 SEP 26r 1983 Oo079 Oo02 5 JAH 3r 1984 Oo042 Oo014

=', SEP 26r.1983 Oo082 0 024

~

6 JAH 3r 1984 Oo04 Oo016 7 SEP 26r 1983 Oo09 Oo022 7 JAH 3r 1984 Oo047 0 o 025' 8

SEP JAH 'r 26r 1983 1984 0o 051 Oo048 I

~

Oo019 0 o,016 9 SEP 26r 1983 Oo042 Oo 017 9 JAH '3r 1984 Oo035 Oo015 21 SEP 26r 1983 Oo071 0.022 21 JAH 3r 1984" <Oo03

'73 SEP 26r 1983 Oo067 Oo021 23 JAH 3r 1984 Oo034 Oo024 40 SEP 26r 1983 Oo073'. Oo024 40 JAH 3r 1984 Q Q44 " Oo015 48 SEP 26r 1983 Oo072 Oo02 48 JAH 3r 1984 0.051 . Oo016 57 JAH 3r 1984 Oo076 Oo035 rr ~

4-26

Table 4-1.2

~,

AIR e ,".O'NALYS IS UNITS'TATION o CESIUM-134 r-Ci/M3 DATE CONCEHTRAT ION TWO SIGMA SEP 27 r 1982 <Oi04 1 DEC 271 1982 <0+02 1 MAR 28r 1983 <oooa

'1 JUH 27r 1983 <o.oa a SEP 26r 1983 <Oo002 1 JAH 3r 1984 <0+002 JUH 28r 1982 <oooa 4 SEP 27r 1982 <oooa 4 DEC 27t 1982 <oioa 4 MAR 28r 1983 <0 ~ 01 4 JUH 27r 1983 <Or 01 SEP 26r 1983 <0+0014 4 JAH 3 'r 1984 <0>003 5 JUH 28r 1982 ~ <oioa 5 SEP 27t 1982 ..<oioa C DEC 27 t 1982 <Oo.02 .

5 MAR 28r 1983 <oioa 5 JUN 27 t 1983 . <Oroa 5 SEF 26r 1983 <Or0016 P ~P 5 JAH 1984 <oo0016 JUH 28r 1982 <o,oa'0>04 SEP 27r 1982 DEC 27r 1982 <Oi Oa MAR 28r 1983 <Oioa JUH 27r 1983 . <Or01 6 SEP 26r '.983: <Oiooa8 6 JAH 3 r 1'984 <Oi002 7 SEP 27r "1.982 <Or04 7 DEC 27r': 1982 <Oo02

7. MAR 28r .1983 <Oroi 7 JUH 27:r 1983 <oooa 7 SEP 26r 1983 <oi0016 JAH '3r 1984 .

<Oi002 JUH 28r 1982 <oooa 8 SEP 27t 1982 <0+01 8 'DEC -27r 1982 <0+02 M'A R 28r 1983 <0+01

-e 8 'JUN SEP 27r 1983 26r 1983

<0+01,

<ooooa8 4-27

Table 4-1.2 (continued)

AIR AHALYSIS'ESIUM-134 UNITS: pCi/M3 STATIOH DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TMG SIGMA 8 JAH 3>> 1984 <O.o0015 9, JUH 28r 1982 <0+01'0)02 9 SEP 27>> 1982 9 . DEC 27>> 1982 <Oi 01 9 MAR 28>> 1983 <Oooi 9 JUH 27>> 1983 <0+01 9 SEP 26r 1983 <Oo0014 9 JAH 3r 1984 .<Oi0018 21 SEP 27>> 1982 <Oroi

,,l 1 DEC 27>> 1982 <0>02 21 MAR 28>> 1983 <Oioi 21 JUH 27>>'983 <O.O1 21 SEP 26>> 1983 <Or002 21 JAH 3>> 1984 <Oo002 SEF 27>> 1982: <Oooi DEC 27r 1982 <0>>01 23 MAR 28>> 1983'UH

<0>>01 27r 1983 <Oooi A3 SEP 26>> 1983 <Oi0014 JAH 3>> 1984 <0+003

'" 40 40 MAR 28>> 1983 JUH 27r 1983

-<0 01 o

<Oioi 40 SEP 26>> 1983 <Oi002 40 JAH 3r 1984 <Oe0015 48 MAR 28>> 1983 <O.i 01 48 JUH 27>> 1983 <0'i 01 48 SEP 26>> 1983 <0 i 0015 48 JAH 3r 1984 <Or0019 57 JAH 3>> 1984 <Oo005 4-28

Tabl e 4-1.3 AIR e AHAI YSISl UNITS'TATION CESIUM-137 r Ci/M3 "DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 1 SEP 27 t 1982 <Or04 1 DEC .<<7 t 1982 <Oi02 1: MAR 281 1983 <Oooa.

1" JUH 271 1983 <Ot01 1 SEP 261 1983 <0+0016 1

s JAN 31 1984 <Ot003 4 JUH 28r 1982 <Otoi SEP 271 1982. <Otoi DEC 27r 1982 <Otoi MAR 28 1983 <oi Oa 1983 <oooa 1'71 4 JUH 4 SEP 261 1983 <0.002 4 JAH 31 1984 (Ot003 JUN 28r 1982 <oioa 5 SEP 271 1982 <0+01 5 DEC 27t 1982 <Oi02 L:=e 5 MAR 281 1983 <Otoi JUN .27 1 1983 <Otoi 5 SEP 26r 1983 <Ot002 JAN 3 ~ 1984 <Oi 0016 6 JUH 281 1982 <Otoa 6 SEP 27r 1982 ~

<Ot04 6 -.DEC 27 t 1982 <oioa 6 281 1983 '<o.oa 6 27 1 1983 <Otoi 6 SEP 26r 1983 <Ot003 JAH 31 1984 <Ot0015 70 SEP 271 1982 <Oo04 7 DEC 271 1982 <0+02 7 MAR 28r 1983 <Otoi 7 JUH 27 ~ 1983 <oooa 7 'SEP 26r 1983 <Ot0016 JAH 3t 1984 <0.-.003 8 JUN 281 1982 <Oi Oi 8 SEP 271 1982 <Otoi DEC 271 1982 <Oi02

'e 8 ~ MAR 281 1983 <oooa

'EP 27r JUH 1983 <0 boa 8 261 1983 <Oiooa8

Tab1e 4-1.3 (continued)

AIR ANALYSIS i CESIUM-137 UNITS t F Ci/M3 STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 8 JAH 3~ 1984 <Oo0016

~

9 JUN 28t 1982 <Oo01 SEP 27~ 1982. <Os02

~

9 DEC 27~ 1982 .<Oo01 9 MAR 28i 1983 <0 i 01 9 JUH 27t 1983 <Oo01 SEP 26t 1983 <Oi 0018 9 JAH 3t 1984 <Oo0013 SEP. 27~ 1982 <0.01 21 ,DEC 27r 1982 <Oi02 21= 'AR 28~ 1983 <0+01

.1 1 JUH 27t 1983 <Oo01 SEP 26t 1983 <Oi002 21 JAH 3r 1984 <Os0019 23 SEP 27~ 1982 <Oi01 P3 DEC 27'982 <Oo01 23 MAR 28r 1983 <Oo01 23 JUN 271 1983 <Oi01 23 SEP 26~ 1983 <Oo002 JAN 3~ 1984 <0.003 40 MAR 28~ 1983 <Oo01 40 40 JUH 27~

SEP 26~

1983 1983

<0 '1

<Oi0018 40 JAH 3~ 1984 <Oi0016 48 MAR 28~ 1983 <Oe01 48 JUN 27'983 <Oi01 48 SEP 26'983 <0+0015 48 l

JAH 3~ 1984 <0+002 57 JAH 3~ 1984 <Oo006

Table 4-1.4 AIR t-: ANALYSIS:

UNITS:

CERIUM-144 r-Ci/M3 STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 1 SEP 26r 1983 <Oo007 1 . JAH 3r 1984 <Oi013 4 SEP 26r 1983 <Or007 4 JAN 3 ~ 1984 <0+01.3 5 '" '=-"SEP 26'r 1983 <Oo006 5 JAN 3r 1984 <Or006 SEP 26r 1983 <Or008

'66 JAH 3r 1984 <Oi006 e

7 SEP 26r . 198,3 '-. <Oi007 4 7 JAH 3r 1984 <0.01 .

8 SEF 26 1983 <0 i 006 3r 1984. <Oe006 r'AH 8

9 SEP 26r 1983 <Oo00?

9 JAN 3r 1984

<0+006'Oi006 21 SEP 26r 1983

'7 1 JAH 3r 1984 <Oo009 23 SEP 26r 1983 <Oi006 23 JAN 3r 1984 <Oi 013 40 SEP'6r 1983 <Oi007 40 . JAH 3r 1984 <Oi005 48 SEP 26r 1983 <Oi007 48'AH =3r'984 <Or005 57 JAH 3r 1984 <Oi02

Table 4-1,.5 AIR

'AHALYSIS: IODIHE-232 UHITS: t Ci/M3 STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TMO SIGMA 1 24t '1983 <O,i 07 1 JAH 3it 1983 <Ot07 1

1 FEB 7t 1983 FEB 14r 1983

<0 '7

<Ot07 1 FEB 22r 1983 <Ot07 1 FEB 28t 2983 <0 F 07 1 MAR 7t 1983 <Ot07 1 MAR 14t 1983 <0 t 1 MAR 28r 1983 07'Ot07

1 APR 4t 1983 <0+07 APR iit 19.83 APR'8 2983 t

<Oo07

<0.07 1 AFR, 25t '1983 <0.07 1 MAY 2t 1983 <Oo07 MAY 9t 983

<Ot07 1 MAY 26r 1983 <0+07 1 MAY 23r 1983 <Ot07 MAY 31 r 1983 <Oi07 1 JUN 6r 1983 <Ot07 1 JUH 13r 1983 <0 ~ 0-7 JUH 20t 2983 <0 t07 1 JUH 27r 1983 <Oo07 JUL 5t 1983 <0.03 1

1 JUL iir 1983 JUL 18t 1983

<0.04

<Ot02 1 JUL 25r 1983. <Ot02 1 AUG it 1983 <Ot02 1 AUG 8r 1983 <Oo03 1 AUG 15t 1983 <Oo02 1 AUG 22r 1983 <Ot03 1 AUG 29t 1983 <Ot02 1 SEP 6r 1983 <0+03 SEP 12t 1'983 <Oi04 1 SEP 19r 1983 <Ot03 1 SEP 26t 1983 . <Ot04 1 OCT 3 f 1983 <Oi05 1 OCT 10t 1983 <Oo04 1 OCT 17r 1'983 <Ot05 1 OCT 24t 1983 <Ot04 OCT 31r 1983 <Ot04 1 HOU 7t 1983 <Ot05 HOU 14r 1983 <Ot02 HOU 21t 1983 <Oo04 1 HOU 28r 2983 <Ot02 4-32

Tab1e 4-1.5 (continued)

AIR AHALYSIS: IODINE-131 r-Ci/M3

• UNITS'TATION DATE 'ONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 1 DEC 5t 1'983 <0+03 1 DEC 12r 1983 <Oi05 DEC 19t 1983 <Oi04 1 DEC 27r 1983'5'84 <Ot05 1 JAH 3t . <Ot07 h~

1 JAH 9r 15'84 <0+04 JAH 16t 1984 <Oi 05 '

~ ~

JAN 24r 1983 <Oo07 4 JAH 31t 1983 <Oi07 FEB 7r 1983 <0+07 4 FER 14t 1983 <Oi07 22r 1983 <Oo07 FEB 28t 1 5'83 <Oe07 MAR 7r 1983 <Oi07 4

~

MAR 14t 1983 <Oo07 4 MAR 28r 1983 <0+07 4 4r 1983 <Ot07 11r 1'983 ~ <Ot07 18t 1983 <Ot07 25 t 1 5'83 <Ot07 MAY'AY 1983 <Oi07 1983 <0.07 4 MAY 16t 1983 <Oo07 4 ilAY 23t 1983 <Ot07 4 MAY 31t 1983 <Ot07 JUN 6r 1983 <Oi07 JUH 13r 1 5'83 <Oi07 4 JUH 20r 15'83 <Oo07 4 JUH 27t 1983 <Oo07 JUL 51 1983 <0>03 JUL ilr JUL 18r 1983 1983 "<0 o 04

<0+02 JUL 25t '983

<Ot02 AUG 1983 <Oi02 AUG St 1983 <Oi03 AUG 15r 1983 <Ot02 4 AUG 22r 1983 <Oi 03 AUG 29r 1983" <0+02 SEP 6r 1 5'83 <Ot03 SEP 12t 1983 <Oo04 SEP 19t 1983 <Oi03 SEP 26r 1983 <Oo04 4 OCT 3t 1983 <Oi05 4-33

Tab1e 4-1.5 (continued)

AIR ANALYSIS+ IODINE-131 J Ci/M3 UNITS'TATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 4 OCT 10r 1983 <0 i 04 OCT 17t 1983,.; <0+06 OCT 1983 <Oi04 OCT 31t 1983 .- .<Oi04 HOV 7t 1983 <0+05 4 HOV 14r 1983 <0+02 HOV 21t 1983 <Oo08 HOV 28r 1983 <Oo02 DEC 5J t 1983 <Or03 4 DEC 12t 1983 <0 F05 4 DEC 19t 1983 <0 i 04 4 DEC 27t 1983 <Oo05 4 JAH 31 1984 <Oo07 r JAH 9r 1984 <0.03 JAH 16t 1984 <Oi 05 5 24t 1983 <OC07 C'

JAH 31,t 1983 <Oi07 FEB 7f 1983 <OC07 5 FEB 14t 1983 <Or 5 FEB 22 t 1983 07'0+07 5 FEB 28t 1983 <OC07 C

MAR 7t 1983 <Oi07 5 MAR 14t 1983 <Oe07 5

5 MAR APR 28 r 1983 1983

<0 '7

<Ot07 5J APR 11t 1983 <Oi07 CJ AP.R 18t 1983 <Oi07 5 APR 25r 1983 <Oi07 C'AH 5

5 MAY MAY 2r 9t 1983 1983

<Ot07

<Oi07 5 MAY 16t 1983 <Oo07 5J MAY 23t 1983 <Oi07 5 MAY 3ir 1983 <Oo07 5 JUN 6r 1983 <Oi07 C'

JUH 13t 1983 <Oi 07 JUH 20t 1983 <Oi 07 5 JUH 27t 1983 <Oo07 JUL 5J r 1983 <OC03 5J 5

C' JUL iit JUL 18t 1983 1983

<OC04

<0.02.

JUL 25t 1983 <Oi02 5 AUG 1t 1983, <0.02 AUG 8t 1983 <Oi03

Tab1e 4-1.5

(continued)

AIR ANALYSIS t IODINE"131 UNITS: r-C 1/M3 STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA C'

5".

"5 AUG AUG AUG SEP 1St 1983 1983 29r 1983 6r 1983 SEP. 12,t 1983 SEP.. 19r'983

~

'0 i 02

<Oo03

<0 i 02

<Oi03

<0+04

<0 F03 26r 1983 <Oi04 OCT 3r 1983 <0+05 5 OCT 10t 1983 <Oo04 OCT 17r 1983 <0.05 5 OCT 24 r 1983 <Oi04 5 ~ OCT 31t 1983 <Oi04 5 HOU 7t 1983 <0.05 5 NOU 14r 1983 <0.02 5

C HOU 2lt 1983 <0.03 HOU 28t 1983 <Oo02 DEC 5r 1903 <Oo03 DEC 12r 1'983 <0.05 5 DEC 19t 1983 <0+04 S DEC 27r 1983 <Oi05.

5 JAH 3t 1984 <0>07 5 JAN 9r 1984 <Or04 5 JAH iht 1'984 "<Oo 05 JAH 24t 1983 <Oo07 JAH 31t 1983 <Oi07 FEB 7r 1983 <0+07 6 FEB '14r 1983 <Oo07 6 Ff B 22r 1983 <0>07 6 F E'B 1983 <Oi07

'6 HAR 7r 1983 <Oo07 6 HAR 14 r 1983 <Oi07 6 HAR 28r 1983 <Oi07 6 APR 4t 1983 <Oe07 6

6 APR llr 18r 1983 1983

<Oi07

<Oi07 APR 6 APR 25 1 1983 <Oi07 6 MAY 2t 1983 <Oi07 6 MAY 9r 1983 <Oi07 6 HAY 16r 1983 <Oo07 6 HAY 23r 1983 <0+07 6 MAY 31t 1983 <Oo07 6 JUH hr 1983 <Oi07 6 JUH 13t 1983 <0+07

Table 4-1.5 (continued) 0~

ANALYSIS) IODINE-131 UNITS e F Ci/M3 STATION CON CEHTRAT ION TMO SIGMA JUH 20t 1983 <Or07 JUH 27r 1983. <Oi07 JUL 5t 1983 <Oi03--

6 6

JUL ilr JUL 18t 1983 15'83

<Oi04

<Or02 6 JUL 251 1983. <Or02 6 AUG it 1983 15'83 HS 6 AUG Sr NS 6 AUG a5t 1983 HS AUG 2>r 15'83 ~ (0+05 AUG 25' 1983 <Oo02, 6 SEP .6t 1983 <Oi03 6 SEP 12r 1983 <0.04

.6 SEP 19r '983

'<Oi03 6 SEP 26t 1983 <Or04 6 OCT 3t 1983 <0 i 05 6 OCT 10t 1983 <Oo04 6 OCT 17r 1983 <Oi05 6 OCT 1983 <Or04 6 OCT 31t 1983 <Oo04 6 HOU 7t 1983 ~

<Oi05 6 NOV 14r 1983 <Or02 6 NOU 2at 1983 <0.03 HOU., 28t 1983 <0.02 DEC 5t 1983 <Oo03 6 DEC i2 r 15'83 <0+05 DEC 19t 1983 (Oo04 I 27t 1983 <Oi 05 6 JAH 3r '984

<0 i 07 6 JAN 9'r .15'84 <0 F03

6 - '-

';,JAN 16r 1984 <Or05 7 JAH 24t 1983 <Or07 7 JAH 31t 1983 <Oo07 7 FEB 7t 1983 <0+07 7.

'7 FEB 14t 22t 1983 1983

<Oo07

'7 FEB <0 7 FEB 28t 1983 <Oo07 7 MAR 7t 1983 <Oe07 7 MAR 14t 1983 <Oi07 7 MAR 28t 1983 <0+07 7 APR 4t 1983 <Oo07 7 APR 11t 15'83 <0.07 7 APR 18t 1983 (0.07

'- Tab1e 4-1.5 (continued)

AIR ANALYSISi IODINE-131 UNITS' t Ci/H3 STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGNA' AFR.25t 1983 <Oo07 HAY 2r 1983 <Or07 7 HAY 9t 1983 <Or07 7 HAY 16r. .1983 <Oi07 7 NAY 23 t 1983 <Or07 7 MAY 31t 1983 <Or07 ~, h 7 JUN 6r 1983 <Oi07 7 JUN 13r 1983 <Or07 JUH 20t 1983.

7 7

7 7

JUL JUL

'tiir JUH 27 t 1983' 1983 1983

<Or07

'<Or 07

<Or03

<Or04 7 JUL 18r 1983 <0 i 02 7 JUL 25t 198.3i <0.02 7 AUG 1t 1983 <Or02

~ 7 AUG 8r 1983 <0+03 7 AUG 15t &83 <Or02 7 22t 1983 <Or03 7 AUG 29t 1983 <Or02 7 SEP 6t 1983 <0+03 7 SEP 12t 1983 <Or04 7 ~

SEP 19r 1983 '<0 r 03 7 SEP 26t 1983 <Oi 04 7 OCT 1983 <0.05 7 OCT iot OCT 17t 1983 1983

<0 '4

<Or05 7 OCT 24t 1983 <Or04 7 OCT 31r 1983 <Ot04 7 NOV 7t 1983 <Or05 7 HOV 14 r 1983 <Or03 7 HOV 21t 1983 HS 7 HOV'28r ,1983 .NS 7 DEC 5r 1983 HS 7 DEC 12t 1983.. HS 7 DEC 1st 1983 <Oi04 .

7 DEC 27 t 1983 <Ot06 7 JAH 3t 1984 <0 i 07 7 JAH 1984 <Or05 7 JAH 16t 1984 <Oo04 8 JAN 24r 1983 <Or07 8 JAH 31t 1983 <Or07 8 FEB 7 r 1983 <Or07 8 FEB 14r 1983 <Or07 4-37

Tab1e 4-1.5 (continued)

AIR ANALYSISi IODINE-131

. r-Ci/H3 UNITS'TATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 8' ,FER 22t 1983 ~

<Or07 FEB 28r 1983'983 <Ot07 8 MAR 7r <Oo07 8 HAR 14r 1983 <Oi07 8 MAR 28r 1983 <Ot07 8 APR 4r 1983 <Ot07 8

8 APR APR 18r lit 1983 1983

<0)07

<Oo07 8 APR 25t 1983 <Or07

. 8 HAY 2r 1983 <Or07 HAY 9t 1983 <Or07 HAY 151 1983 <0.07

~

8 8

8 e

MAY 23r HAY 31r 1983 1983

<0 '7

<0.07 8 JUN ht 1983 <Or07 8 JUH 13r 1983. <Or07 8 JUH.20t 1983 <Os07 8 JUH 27r '19 83 <Ot07 8 JUL 5t 1983 <0 i 03 8

8 JUL lit JUL 18r 1983 1983 <0+04

<Or02 8 JUL 251 1983 <0+02 8 AUG 1983 <Oi02 8 AUG 8r 1983 <Oo03 8 AUG 15t 1983 <0.02 8

8 AUG AUG 22) 29r 1983 1983

<0 '3

<Or02 8 SEP 5r 1983 <Oi03 8 SEP 12r 1983 <0+04 8 SEP 19r 1983 <0+03 8 SEP 26r '983

<Oo04 8 OCT 3t 1983 <Or05 8 OCT 10t 1983 <Ot04 "8 OCT 17r 1983. <Oi05 8 OCT 24r 1983 . <Or04 8 OCT 31r 1983 <Ot04 8 HOV 7t 1983 <Oo05 8 HOV 14r 1983 <Ot03 8 HOV 2lr 1983 <Ot03 8 NOV 28r 1983 <Or02 8 DEC 5t 1983 <Or03 8 DEC 12r 1983 <0.05 8 DEC 19r 1983 <0.04 8 DEC 271 1983 <Or05

Tab1e 4-'l.g (continued)

AIR

( ANALYSIS:

UNITS t IODINE-131 r.C 1/M3 STATIOH CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 8 JAN 3r 1984 <Oo07 8 JAH 9r 1984 (Ot05 8 JAH 16t 19'84 <Oo04 9 JAN 24r 1983 <Oi07 JAN 31t 1983 <Oo07 9 FEB 7t 1983 <Oi07 5 9 FEB 14t FEB 221 1983 1983

<0 '7

<Ot07 FEB 28t 1983 <0>07 9 MAR 7t 1983 <Oi07 9 MAR 14r 1983" <0.07 MAR 28r 1983 <0.07 9

9 APR AF'R 4t aar 1983 1983

<0 '7

<Oo 07.

9 APR 18t 1983 <Ot07 9 APR 25t 1983 <O.O7 pt 1983 <Ot07 Ee 9 9

MAY HAY MAY 9t 16r 1983 1983

<0.07

<Oi07 HAY 23t 1983 <Ot07 9 MAY 31t 1983 (Oi 07 JUH 6t 1983 (Oo07 JUH 13> 1983 <Oo07 9 JUH '20 r 1983 <Ot07 E 9 JUH 27t 1983 <Ot07 JUL 5 ~ 1983 <0+03 JUL 11r 1983 <Ot04 9 JUL 18t 1983 . <Ot03 9 JUL 25r 1983 (Oo02 9 AUG ir 1983 <Oo03 9 AUG 8r 1983 <Ot03 E 9 AUG 151 19b3. <Oo03 9 AUG 22 t 1983 <Oi03 9 AUG 29r 1983 <0+02 SEP 6t 1983'983 <Ot02 SEP 12t <Ot04, 9 SEP 19t 1983 <Ot04 SEP 26t 1983 <Ot05 9 OCT 3t 1983 <Ot04 9 OCT iot 1983 (Oi03 9 OCT 17t 1983 (Oi05 9 OCT 24t 1983 <Oi03 OCT 31t 1983 <Oo04

Tab1e 4-1.5 (continued)

AIR ANALYSIS: IODINE-131

/ t Ci/M3 UNITS'TATION CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA NOV, 77, 1983 <0704 9 NOV 147 1983 <0+03 9 HOV 217 1983 <Oo05 9 NOV 287 1983. <0 F02 DEC 57 1983 <0703 9 DEC 127 1983 <0+05 9 DEC 197 1983 ".0. 04 9 DEC 277 1983 <0703 9' JAH 37 1984 <0.04 JAN 97 1984 <0+05 9 JAN 167 1984 <0.04 pa JAN 247 1983 <0.07

)

21 f JAH 317 FEB 77 1983 1983

<0 '7

<0707.

21 147 1983 <0707 21 227. 1983 <Oo07

.21 287 1983 <Oo07 21 7t 19S3 <0707 21 MAR 147 1983 <Ot 07 thAR 287 1983 <0707 21 APR 47 1983 <0.07 21 APR 117 1983 <0707 2f APR 187 19S3 <0707.

21 APR 257 1983 <0.07 21 MAY 2t 1983 <0707 21 MAY 97 1983 <0707 21 MAY a67 1983 <0707 MAY 23r 1983 <Oo07 2a MAY 317 1983 <0707 21 JUN 67 1983 <0+07 JUH 137 1983 <0707 21 JlJN 20r 1983 <0+07 21 JUH 277 1983 <0707 21 JUl 51 1983: . <0703 2a JUL 1983 '.': <Oi04 21 JUL 187 1983: <0703 21 JUL 257 1983 <0.03 21 AUG ir 198,3 <0703 AUG 87 1983 <0704 21 AUG 15 7,1'983 <0703 21 AUG 227:1983 <0703 Pf AUG 29 t: 1983 <0702 21 SEP 67:1983 <0702

4-1.5 (continued) / ~

( AHALYSIS>>

UNITS>>

IOD IHE-131 1 Ci/M3 STATION CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 21 SEP 121 1983 <0>>03 21 SEP 191 1983 <0>>04 SEP 261 1983- <0>>05 L'able

~1 OCT 31 1983 <0>>09 lf OCT 101 1983 <0>>ii 21 OCT 171 1983 <0>>05 21 OCT 241 1983 .0>>03 OCT 311 1983 '0>>04 21 HOV 71 1983 <0>>04 p] HOV 141 1983 <0>>03 21 HOV 211 1983 <0>>05 21 NOV '281 1983 <0>>02 21 DEC 51 1983 <0.04 21 DEC 121 1983 <0.06 21 DEC 191 1983 <0>>04 21 'DEC 271 . 1983 (0>>03 21 JAH 31 1984 -.0>> 04

'2l JAH 91 1984 <0>>04 E 21 JAH 161 1984 <0>>,05 23 JAN 241 1983 (0>>07 23 JAH 311 1983 <0>>07 23 FEB 71 1983 <0>>07 g3 I FEB 141 1983 <0.07 f ~ '13 FEB 1983 <0>>07 I"C 23 FEB 281 1983 <0>>07 23 MAR 71 1983 .<0>>07 23 MAR 141 1983 <0>>07 MAR 281 1983 <0>>07 APR 1983 <0>>07 APR 111 1983 <0>>07 23 APR 181 1983 <0>>07 APR 25 1 1983 <0>>07 23 MAY 1983 <0>>07.

MAY 91 1983 NS fi 23 MAY 161 1983 <0>>07 MAY 231 1983 <0>>07 23 MAY 311 1983 <0>>07 23 JUN 61 1983 <0>>07

,. 23 JUH 13 1 1983 <0>>07 JUH 201 1983 <0>>07 23 JUH 77 1983 <0>>07

'73 JUL 51 1983 (0>>03 23 JUL 111 1983 <0>>04 4-4 1.

Table 4-1.5 (continued)

~ ~

AIR

. ANALYSIS'ODINE-131 UN ITS: pCi/H3 STATION DATE CON CEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA JUL 18t 1983 <0 03 23 JUL 25r 1983 <Ot03 23 AUG 1 t f983 <Ot03 23 AUG 8r 1983 <Oo04 23 AUG 15t 1983 <Oo03 23 AUG 1983 <Oi03 23 AUG 29t 1983 <Ot02 23 SEP 6r 1983 <Or02 23 SEP "12 t 1983 <Or03 SEP 19r 1983 <Or04 26t 1983 <Oo05 OCT 3r 1983 <Or04

,l 3'1 OCT 10r 1983 ,<0 03 o

3 OCT 17r 1983 <Oo05 23 OCT 24t 1983 <Oo03 23 OCT 31t 1983 <Oo04 HOV 7t 1983 <Ot04 23 NOV 14r 1,983 <Or03 A3 NOV 21t 1983 <Oi 05

23. NOV 28t 1983 <Or02 23 DEC 5r 1983 <Oo04 23 DEC 12r 1983 <Or05 l3 DEC 19r 1983 <Oo04 y7 OEC 27 r 1983 <Oo03 23 JAH 3t 1984 .. <Or 04 23 JAH 9r 1984 <0+04 2M JAN 16t '984

<Ot05

40. JAH '31r 1983 <Or 07 40 'EB 7t 1983 <Or07 40 FEB 14>> 1983 <Ot07 40 22t 1983 <Or07 40 FEB 28r 1983 <0+07 40 MAR 7t 1983 <Oo07 40 HAR 14r 1'983 <Ot07 40 MAR 28r 1983 <0<07 40 APR 4t. 1983 <Or07 40 APR 11 t 1983 <Or07 40 APR 18t 1983 <0+07 40 APR 25 t 1983 <Oo07 40 HAY f 1983 <Or07 40 HAY 9r 1983 <Oo07 40 HAY 16r 1983 'Or07 40 HAY 23t 1983 <Ot07

Table 4-1.5 (continued)

AIR I- ANALYSIS'NITS'TATION IODINE-131

'r-Ci/M3 DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 40 MAY 31 r 1983 <Ot07 40 JUH 6t 1983 <Ot07 40 JUH 13t 1 5'83 <Ot07 40 JUH 20r 1983 <Ot07 40 JUN 27t 1983 <Ot07 40 JUL 5r 15'83 <Ot03 40 40 JUL lit 1983 JUL 18r 1983

<Oo04

<0+03 E 40 JUL 25t 1983 <Oo03 40 AUG lr 1983 <Oi03 40 AUG St 1983 <Ot04 40 '0 AUG 151 1983 HS AUG 1983 <Ot03 40 AUG 29t 1983> <0 F 02 40 SEP 6t 1983 <Ot02 40 SEP 12t 15'83 <Ot03 40 SEP a5t 1983 <Ot04 26r 15'83

'0 SEP <O.i 05 40 OCT 3t 1983 <Ot04 40 OCT lpr 1983 CO,03

'40 OCT 17 r 1983 <Ot05 40 OCT 24 r 1 5'83 <0.03 4p OCT 3ar 1983 <Ot04 40 HOV 71 15'83 <0.04 40 NOV 14t 1983 <Otp3 40 HOV 21t 1983 <Ot05 4p HOV 28r 1 5'83 <Ot02 40 DEC Sr 1983 <0.04 40 DEC 12t 1983 <Ot05 40 DEC 19r 15'83'583 <Otpi 40 DEC 27 t <Ot03 40 JAH 3 r 1984 <Ot04 40 JAH 9t 1984 <Ot05 40 JAN 16r 1984 <Ot04 48 FEB 7t 1983 <pi 07 48 FEB 14r 1983 <Oi07 48 FEB 22r 1983 ~

<Ot07 48 FEB 28r 1983 <Ot07 48 MAR 7r 1983 <Oi07 48 MAR 14r 1983 <Ot07 48 MAR 28t 1983 <Ot07 48 APR 4r 1983 <Ot07

. 48 APR iit 15'83 <Ot07

Table 4-1.5 (continued)

AIR ANALYSIS: . IODIHE-131 UNITS) t Ci/N3

.., STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGNA 48 APR 181 1983 <Oo07 48 APR 25r 1983 <Or07 48 NAY 2r 1983 <Or07 48 NAY .9t 1983 <Oo07 48 NAY .16r 1983 . <Or07 48 MAY 1983 <Or07 48 NAY 31t 1983 <Or07

'848 48 JUH JUH 6r 13t JUH 20t 1983 1983 1983

<Oi07

<Oi07.

<Oi07

'48'8 JUH 27t 1983 <Oo07 JUL 5t 1983 <0.03 48 48 JUL iit JUL 18r 1983 1983

~

<0.04

<0.03 48 JUL 25 t 1983 <Oi03 48 AUG 1t 1983 <Oi03 48 AUG 8t 1983 <Or04 48 AUG .15t 1983 <0+03 48 AUG 22t;1983 r ~

<Oi03 48 AUG 29r 1983 C

<Oi 02 48 SEP 6 t. 1983 <0.02 48 SEP 12t 1983 <Or03 19t 1983 <0+04

'8 SEP 48 SEP 26t 1983 <Or05 48 . OCT 3 t 1983 <0.04 48 OCT 10t 1983 <0.03 48 OCT 17, 1983 <Oi05 48 OCT 24t 1983 <Oi03 48 OCT 31r 1983 <0+04 48 HOV 7r 1983 <Oi04 48 HOV 14t 1983 <Or03 48 HOV 21r 1983 <Or05 48 HOV 28t 1983 <Or02 48 DEC 5t 1983 <0.04 48 DEC 12r 1983 <Oi05 48 DEC 19t 1'983 <Or01 .

48 DEC 27t 1983 <Or03 48 JAH 3t 1984 <0 i04 48 JAH 9t 1984 <Oi 05 48 JAH 16t 1984 <0.04 57 DEC 5r 1983 <Or04 57 DEC 12t 1983 <Or05 57 DEC 19r 1983 <Oi01

Table 4-1.5 (continued)

AIR ANALYSIS o IODINE-131 UNITS: F Ci/M3 STATIOH DATE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGMA 57 DEC 27~ 1983 <Oi 03 57 JAH 3 ~ 198'4 <Oi04 57'7 JAH 9~ 1984 <Oo05 JAN 16~ 1984 <Oi04 4-45

Tab1e 4-1.6 AIR NIOBIUM-95

'"ANALYSIS:

'NITS: r-Ci/M3 STATION DATE CONCENTRATION 1 SEP, 26r 1983 <Oo004 1 . JAH 3r 1984 <Or003 4, SEP 26r 1983 <Oo0018 4 JAH 3r 1984 <Or004 5 SEP 26r 1983 <Or002 5 JAH 3r 1984 <0 i 0016 6 SEP 26 r 1983 <Or003 6 JAH 3r 1984 ~

<Or003 7 SEP 26r 1983 <0 i 002 7 JAH 3i . 1984 <0.004 8 SEF'6r 1983 ~

<Oo002 8 JAH 3 r 1984 'Oo0017 9 SEP 26,r 1983 <0>002 9 'JAH 3r 1984 <Oo003 21 SEF'6r 1983 <Or002 21 JAH 3r 1984 <Or004 23 'EP 26r 1983 <Or002 23 JAH '3r 1984 <Oi004 40 SEP 26r, 1983 <Or003 40 JAH 3r 1984 <Oo002 48 SEP 26r 1983 <Or003 48 JAH 3r 1984 <Or003 5 JAH 3 r 1984 <Oo005

Tab1e 4-'1.7 ANALYSIS: ZIRCONIUM-95 r G'1/M3 J

UNITS'TATION DATE CONCENTRATION T4lO SIGMA 1,'EP i.

I JAN 26r 1983 3r 1984

<0.005

<Oo007 SEP 26r 1983 <Oo005 4 JAH.. 3r 1984 <0 '06 SEP 26 '983 <0)004 JAH 3r 1984 <0+004 6 SEP 26r 1983 <Oi005 6 JAH 3r 1984 <Oi004 7 SEP 26r 1983 <0.004 7 JAH -3r 1984 <0.006 8 SEP 26r 1983 <0 005 8 J*H 3r 1984 <Oe003 9 >

SEP 26r 1983,  ;" "<0 i 006 9 JAH 3r 1984 <0+003 21 SEP 26r 1983 <Oi005

'7 1 JAN 3r 1984 <Oo005 23 SEP'26r 1983 <0 i 004 23 'AN 3r 1984 <Oi 006 40 SEP 26r 1983 <Oo005 40 JAH 3r 1984 <0+004 48 SEP 26r 1983 <0+004 48 JAH 3r 1984 <Oe005 57 ~

JAN 3r 1984 <Oo012

Table 4-2.0 r

AHALYSIS: GROSS ALPHA UHITS: eCi/1 STAT ION COHCEHTRAT ION 52 OCT 5~ 1982 <0 i 30 52 FEB 22~ 1983 . <0+95 5A APR 5~ f983 <Oo50 SEP 27~.f,983 ih4.

'0 C

~ ~

4-48

Tab'te 4-2.1 4IATER ANALYSIS: BARIUM-140

. eCi/1 UNITS'TATIOH DATE COHCENTRATION TWO SIGMA

, SEP 9r 1982 <45.00 26 OCT 14r 1982 <14 ioo 26 NOV 16r, 1982 <33+00 26, DEC ihr '982

<33 00F JAN 14r'or 1983 <23r00 26 FER 1983 <28roo 26 MAR aor 1983 ~

.28 e 00

'26 APR ~

7r 1983 <21 ioo 26 MAY 5r 1983 <28ooo JUH sr 1983 <20.00 26 JUL 7r 1983 <10+00

~

26 26 AUG SEP llr 14r 1983 1983

<130.00

<170r00

<<0'6 OCT 13r 1983 <120.00 HOV aor 1983 <aoo.oo DEC 14r 1'983 <20.00 I

26 ,JAN 13r 1984 (hoooo

'. APR 23r 1982 <7 ~ 00

.77 ,,MAY 20r 1982 - <9ioo

27. JUH 17r 1982 <30.00

'7 JUL ah~ 1982 <aloo00

)7 AUG 12r 1982 <110.00 SEP 1982 (45ooo

<</~

p)

OCT 14r 1982 <14r00 27 NOV 16r 1982 <33roo 2? DEC 16r 1982 <33.00 27 JAH 14r 1983 <23roo 27 ior 1983 (28roo 27 MAR ao 1983 <22.00 2? 'APR 7 ~ 1983 <ihroo 27 MAY 5r 1983 . (28+00 27 JUH 8r 1983 <20roo !I 67 JUL 7~ 1983 <aa ioo r 27 27 AUG SEP llr 14r 1983 1983

<aoo.oo

<190 00F w~

r J

27 OCT 13r 1983 <120+00 27 HO@ ior a983. <300roo 27 DEC 14r 1983 <20roo

'27 JAN 13r 1984 <30+00 28 APR 23r 1982 (8roo 28 MAY 20r 1982 <5.00 28' JUH 17r 1982 <30roo Vp

Tab1e 4-2.1

continued)

MATER ANALYSIS f BARIUM-140 s Ci/1 UNITS'TATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH 28 16r 1982 <130roo 28 AUG 12r 1982 <120+00

~8 SEP 9r 1982 <35roo 28 OCT 14r 1982 <32roo 98 HOV 16r 1982 <33ioo 28 DEC 16r 1982 <33roo 28 JAN 14r 19S3 <23.00 28 FEB ior .1983 <28roo 28 MAR ior (28.i 00 28 APE 7 ~ 1983 <2a,oo

<28.00 28'UL 28 MAY

.JUH 5r .19S3 St 1983 <20ooo 28 JUL 71 1983 <a2.oo 28

".l 8

AUG lir SEP, 14r 1983 1983

<100.00,

<110roo 28 OCT 13r 1983 <120roo 28 HOV lor 1983 <100+00 18 DEC 14r 1983 <20 i 00 JAH 13r 1984 <30.00 MAY 20r 1982 <5roo

'1 9 JUH 17r 1982 <60ooo JUL 16r 1982 <aaoioo AUG 12r 1982 ..<95.00'35o00 79 9r 1982 29 OCT 14r 1982 SL ~

29 NOV 16r 1982. <33 i 00 29 DEC. 16r 1982 <33r 00 29 JAH 14r 1983 <23roo 29 FER ior 1983 <28ioo 29 MAR fOr 1983 <31r 00 29 APR 71 1983 <16ioo MAY 5r 1983 <28roo 29 JUH 8r 1983 <20roo JUL 7r 1983 ~

<15roo 29 AUG aar 1983 <aooioo A9 SEP 14r 1983 <6oi00 29 OCT 13r 1983 <120roo HOV lor 1983 <200roo 29 DEC 14r 1983 <3oroo JAH 13r 1984 <30roo 31 MAR 25r a982 <4 woo 31 JUN 17r 1982 <32 i 00 4-50

Table 4-2.1 (continued) l"-

~ ANALYSIS:

UNITS:

BARIUM-140 r-C 1/1 STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 31 SEP 1982 <35 i 00 31 DEC 27t 1982 <31 00 F

. 31 MAR 14~ 1983 <20i00 31 JUtk 10~ 1983 <30 i 00 31 SEP 1983 <110,,00 31 DEC 14'4'5 1983 <40.00

'32 MAR 0 1,982 <Si00 32 JUH 17i 1982 <32.00 3~ SEP 1982 <35 i 00

~

32 DEC 27 1 1982 <31 i 00 32>> "MAR 14~ 1983 <14e00 32 32

'UH SEP 10'4~

1983 1983

<20+00

<110o00 L" 32

\

DEC 14~ 1983 <50o00

~I L"

4-51

Tab1e 4-2.2 MATER ANALYSISi GROSS BETA UNITS t pCi/I STATIOH DATE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGMA 26 SEP 9r 1982 5ooo 2 too 26 OCT 14r 1982 5roo 2 too

'.26 HOV 16t 1982 2roo 2ioo 26 DEC 16t 1982 aioo iroo 26 JAH 14r 1983 2 r,oo 1ooo 26 FEB iot 1983 2roo aooo 26 MAR ior 1983 '3roo APR 7t 1983 5ioo 1.00 26 MAY 5t 1983 <2ooo 26 JUN 8l 1983 <2ioo 26 JUL 7r 1983 NA

.'? 6 AUG 1983 HA

.26 SEP 14t '1 983 3roo 1 o?0 OCT 13r 1983 2.10 1.30 26 HOV, ior 1983 2 i 90 a ~ 4o

,26 DEC 14r 1983 2i30 ir40 JAH 13t 1984 1+90' 1 i30 27 APR 23r 1982 ioo 2.00 MAY 20t 1982 3r 00'roo 2roo 27 JUN 1982 F 00 27 JUL 16r 1982 . 3 ioo 2.00 27 AUG 12r 1932 3roo 2 00 F

27 SEP 9r 1982 4ooo 2.00

?7 OCT 14t 1982 4roo 2 00 F

27 NOU 16r 1982 3ooo 2ooo 27 DEC 16r 1982 '4roo 2+00 27 JAN 14r 1983 2ioo aioo 27 FEB ior 1983 3ioo iroo 27 MAR aor 1983 2roo a,oo 27 APR 7t 1983 2roo 1 ioo MAY 5r 1983 2roo a.oo 27 JUH sr 1983 <2ioo 27 JUL 7r 1983 HA 27 AUG 11r 1983, HA 27 SEP 14r 1983 <ai90 27 OCT 13t 1983 ii90 ir40 27 HOV ior 1983 <3roo 27 DEC 14r 1983 2r70 ir20 27 JAH 13r 1984 it 90 a.ao 28 APR 23r .1982 6roo 2roo 28 MAY 20t 1982 5.00 2.00 JUN 17r 1982 5roo 2.00 4-52

!: Tab1e 4-2.2 (continued)

I" WATER L. ANALYSIS UNITS o'. r-Ci/I GROSS B E.:6'A STATION DATg CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 28 JUL':6 r 1982 5roo 2too 28 "AUG 12r 1982 4 ioo 2+00 28.SEF": 9r 1982 4+00 2ooo 28 . OCT; 14t a982 5too 2too

~8 =,

"'OV iht 1982 3roo 2i 00 28,;;. DF.:C 16t 1982 <2ioo

'28 "JAN. 1983 2>00 a ioo

,'EB aor 14t'8 1983 3roo 1.00 28 'MAR 10r 1983 2ioo aioo 28 APR 71 1983 3ioo 1.00 28 MAY 5r 1983 1 ioo aioo L 28 JUN JUL 7 r 1983 1983 <2ioo HA 28 AUG aar 1983 <4ooo 28 SEP 14r 19S3 <3ioo 28 , OCT 13r 1983 1 iso '1 o20 28 HOV 10r 1983 3tio I t40

" 28 A9 DEC 1 4't 1983 JAN 13 r 1984 MAY 20t 1982 =-

2iao ao40 htoo a+10 aoao 2 ~ 00 19 JUH 1 7'r 1982 4ooo 2roo

.i 9 JUL ah 1982 4.00 2.00 i9 AUG 12r 1982 5ooo 2ooo

'l 9 SEP 9r 1982 4too 2.00 29 OCT 14r 1982 SL HOV iht 1982 3+00 2i 00 29 DEC ihr 1982 <2.00 g JAN 14r 1983 3too itoo 29 FEB lor 1983 2eoo itoo 29 ior 1983 2ioo 1.00 29 APQ 7r 1983 ~

a.oo aooo 29 MAY 5t 1983 <2ooo JUH 8r 1983 <2+00 A9 JUL 7r 1983 5 29 29 AUG SEP 14t 1983 1983 HA'2ioo 2ioo a i20 l9 OCT 13r 1983 irho ir20 NOV 10r 1983 2iao a i20 29 DEC 14r 1983 2iso ao20 29 JAH 13r 1984 3iao aoao p 4-53

Tab1e 4-2.2 (continued),

MATER

'NALYSIS o GROSS BETA UNITS o ~Ci/I STAT IOH . DATE CON CEHTRATIOH TMO SIGNA JAH .8 l 1980 HA ~

52 tkAR 4 ~ 1980 14 i33 4 i 32 JUL 8l 1980 aOia9 3oee 5 .l OCT it, 1980 7i52 ei20 JAH 5~ 1981 <4e00 5g HAR 30 ~ 1981 lio30 6 i 20 5

C'

.l JUL a 4 l 1981 8>17 5i93 OCT 13 r 1981 11o00 6 F00 C'

JAN 5~ 1982 10.60 6 F60 C'

HAR 30~ 1982 22i00 21 F00 JUL 6 l 1982 <19.00'19.30 C'

OCT 5l 1982 52 FEB 22', 1983 5.26 Oi94 52 APR 5r 19S3 '<2 o 41 52 SEP 27t 1'983 <1 i90 1

~

~ .',

I 1

~

~

4-54

Table 4-2.".

ANALYSISt CESIUM-134 UNITS'TATION r-C i/I DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 26 SEP 1982 <So00 26 OCT 14r 1982 <3,00 26 HOU 16r 1982 <3r00 26 DEC 16t 1982 <3r00 26 JAH 14r 1983 <2i00, 26 FEB 10t 1983 <3r00 MAR 10r 1983 <3i00 26 APR 7t 1983 <3i00 26 MAY. 5r 1983 <3r00 JUN Sr 1983 <3+00 JUL I t 1983 <3i00 26 AUG iir SEP.. 14>

1983 1983

'<4. 00

<5.00 26 OCT 13r 19S3 ~

<1.50 NOV 10r 1983 <1.50 26 DEC 14r 1983 <ii50 26 JAH 1'3 t 1984 <3i00 27 APR 23r 1982 <1,00 27 20t 1982 <3.00 27 JUN 17t 1982 <5 F00 27 JUL 16r 1982 <10r 00

'1 7 AUG 12 1 1982 <12r 00 P7 SEP 9r 1982 <10o00 27 OCT 14r 1982 <3+00 27 NOV 16t 1982 <3i00 27 "DEC 16r 1982 <3+00 27 J*H 14 r 1983 <2o00 27 10r 1983 <3r00 27 MAR 10t 1983  ;<3 r 00 27 APR 7r 1983 <3 00

~

27 MAY 1983 <3r00 27 JUN Sr 1983 <3i00 27 JUL 7t 1983 <4+ 00 27 AUG 1.1 r 1983 <2i00 27 SEP 1 4t 1983 <5r00 17 OCT 1 3r 1983 <ir50 27 HOV 10r 1983 <4o00 27 DEC. 14t 1983 <ir70 27 JAN 13r 1984 <3o00 2S APR 23r 1982 <2.00 28 MAY 20t 1982 .<2 o 00 JUN 17r 1982 <5.00 4-55

Table-4-2.3 (continued)

ANALYSES: CESIUM'-134 UNITS t r-Ci /I STATIOH DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 128 JUL. 1982 <12o00 28 AUG 121 1982 <12i00

.28 SEP "-91 1982 <8o00 28 OCT 141 1982 <7i00 28 ~

1982 <3o00 28 DEC .161 1982 (3i 00

,28 JAH 141 1983 <2i00 28 FEB '01 1983 <3i00 28 MAR 101 1983 <3>00 28 APR 71 1983 <3r00 28 MAY 51 1983 <3o 00, JUH 81 1983 <3.00 28 JUL 7 1 1983 <4.00 28 AUG 111 1983 <F 00 28 1983 <3 F00 28 OCT 13r 1983 <1 i 50 28 HOV 10r 1983 <io40 28 DEC 14r 1983 <ir40 28 JAH 1984 <3+00 MAY 201 1982 <io00 29 JUN 171 1982 <8o00 29 JUL i.o 1 1982 <10.00 29 AUG 121 1982 <10.00

'l 9 SEP 91 1982, <8+00 29 OCT 141 1982 SL 29 iNOV .161 1982 <3i00 29 DEC 161 1982 <3i 00 29 JAH 141 1983 <2o00 29 'EB 101 <3i00 29 ~

MAR 101, 1983 <3 F00 APR 71 1983 <3 F00 MAY 51 1983 (3 F00 29 JUH 81 1983 <3i 00 JUL 7f 1983 <4r00 29 AUG 111 1983 <2 F00 SEP 141 1983 <3 F00 29 OCT 131 1983 <ir50 29 HOV 101 1983 <2>00 29 DEC 141 1983 <ii50 JAH 131 1984 (3i00 MAR 251 1982 <1100 JUH 171 1982 <5+00

Table 4-2.3 (continued)

MATER ANALYSIS: CESIUH-134 UNITS: r-Ci/I STATION CONCENTRATION TMO SIGMA 31 SEP 9~ 1982 <So00'2 31 DEC 27'1 1982 F00 BAR 14~ 1983 <-3.o 00 31 JUH 1983 <bi00 ..

00, 10'1 sEp 14~ 1983 ,<3 o 31 DEC 14r 1983 -.".:, <1,. 80;.;.

32 MAR 25~ 1982 '* <2o00 32 JUH'7r 1982 <5o00 32 SEP 9~ 1982 <Si00 32 DEC 27~ 198~. <2.00 VAR 14 1983 <3o00 3,7 ~

JUN 10~ 19S3 <4,00 32 SEP 14~ 1983 <3.00 DEC 14 1983 <5+00 52 SEP 14~ 1981 1+86 1 i50 4-57

Tab1 e 4-2.4 MATER ANALYSIS'HITS CESIUM-137 r-C i/1

'TATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 26 SEP 9r 1982 .<8 o 00 OCT 14r 1982 <3 ioo 26 HOV ihr a982 <3roo 26 DEC ahr 1982 <3 ioo 26 JAN 14r 1983 <2ooo 26 FEB 10r 1983 <3ioo MAR aor 1983 <3roo 7r 1983 <3roo 26 Sr <F 00 lh JUH 8r 1983 ~ <3roo 26 JUL *7s "1983 1983'OV

<4roo.

26 AUG,.aar 1983 <4 .'00 26 SE'F', 1,4 r 1983 <5.00 OCT'3r 1983 <1.60 26 aor 1983 <1 i40 26 DEC 14r 1983 <ao50 26 , JAN 13r 1984 <3roo 27 APR 23r 1982 <1.00 27 MAY 20r 1982 <3roo A7 JUH 17r 1982 <6roo

.r 7 JUL 161 1982 <ao,oo P7 AUG 12r 1982 <13roo A7 SEP 9r 1982 <ior00

~l OCT 14r 1982 <.3 ioo 27 NOV ihr 1982. <3roo 27 DEC 16r 1982 <3roo 27 JAH 14r 1983 <2ioo 27 FEB 10r 1983 <3ioo A7 MAR 10r 1983 <3ioo 27 APR 71 1983 <3roo 27 MAY 51 1983 <3roo 27 JUH Qr 1983 <3r00 27 JUL 7r 1983 <4roo 27 AUG iir 1983 <3roo 27 SEP 14r 1983 <5ioo 27 OCT 13r 1983 <1rho 27 HOV aor 1983 16roo 3roo 27 ~

DEC 14r 1983 <1ihO

'1 7 JAH 13r 1984 <3roo

%8 APR 231 1982 <2.00 28 /AY 20r 1982 <2.00 28 JUH 17r 1982 <hooo

Table 4-2.4

'(continued)

MATER ANAL'YSIS o 'ESIUM-137 r Ci/I UNITS'TATIOH DATE CONCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA

~ y 28 JUL 16'r 1982 <13r 00, 28 AUG 12r 1982 <13+00 SEP 1982 <8t00

, ~

28 OCT 14r 1982 <7t00 28 HOV 16r 1982 <3r00, 28 DEC 16r 1982 <3i00 28 JAH 14t 1983 <2t00 28 FEB 10r 1983 <3r00 28 MAR 10r 1983 <3<00 28 APR 7F 1983 <3+00 28 M A.Y 5t 1983 <3,00 28 JUH 8 r .1983 <3 F00, 28 JUL 7t 1983 <4 F00 28 AUG 1983 <3.00 SEP 14t 1983 <3t00

.28 OCT 13r 1983 <1o60 28 HOV 10t 1983 <ii40 t'.O 28 DEC 14r 1983 <it 40 28 JAH 13r 1984 <3r00 MAY 20r 1982 <1 t00 29 JUH 17r 1982 ~

<8t00 JUL 16r 1982 <10o00 29 AUG 12r 1982 <10o00 29 SEP 9r 1982 <St00 19 OCT 14r 1982 SL P9 HOU 16r 1982 <3 F00 29 DEC 16r 1982 <3o00 E 29 JAH 14r 1983 <2t00 10r 1983 <3r00 29 MAR 10r 1983 <3i00 29 APR 7r 1983 <3i00 MAY 5r 1983 <3t00 29 JUN 8t 1983 <3 F00 29 JUL 7f 1983 <4s00 29 AUG 11t 1983 <3r00 SEP 14r 1983 <3i 00 29 OCT 13r 1983 <ir60 29 HOV 10r, 1'983 3o90 it50 29 DEC 14r 1983 <ii50 29 J*H 13r 1984 <3 ~ 00 31 MAR .25r 1982 <it00 31 17r 1982 <6i00 L- JUN

Tab1e 4-2.4 (continued)

WATER e CESIUH-137 'NALYSIS UNITS' Ci/1 STATIOH DATE COHCEHTRAT ION TWO 8 IGHA 31 SEP 9r 1982 <8o00 31 DEC 27r 1982, <2r00 31 MAR 14r '1983 <3r00 31 JUH 10r 1983 <6r00 31 SEP 14r 1983 <3r00 31 DEC 14r 1983 <irSO 32 HAR 25 r 1982 <2r00 32 JUH 17r 1982 <6o00 32 SEP 9r 1982 <So00 32 DEC 27r 1982 <2.00 32 MAR 14r 1983 <3.00 32 JUH 10r 1983 <4.00'3r00 32 .SEP 1983

. 32 DEC 14r 1983 <5i00

'2 SEP 14r 1981 0+77 0 i 73 4-60

Tab1e 4-2.5 MATER

• HALYSIS: COBALT-SS UNITS e eCi/I STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGMA 26 SEP 9r 1982 <12 r 00

)6 OCT 14r 1'982 <4o00 26 HOV 16r 1982 <3i00 DEC 16r 1982 <3>00 l6 JAH 14r 1983 <2o00

.i 6 FEB 10t 1983 <3r00 26 101 1983 <3i00 26 APR 7t 1983 <3+00 MAY Sr 1983 (3i00 JUN 81 1983 <3 ~ 00 26 JUL 7t 1983 <6r00 AUG 11r 1983 <7r00 26 SEP 14r 1983 <7r00 OCT 13 r'0r 1983 <3.00 HOV'EC 1983 <2o00 26 14r 1983 <F 00 JAH 13r 1984 <4i00 2? APR 23t 1982 <1 F00 27 MAY 20t 19/2 <2i 00 27 JUH 17r 1982 <5o00 77 BUL 16r 1982 (10r00 17 AUG 12r 1982 <iii00

<</ SEP 9r 1982 (13.00

'37 OCT 14r 1982 - <4r00 27 NOV 16r 19S2 <3i00" 27 DEC 16r 1982 <3r00 27 JAN 14r 1983 <2>00 27 FEB 10t 1983 (3r00 27 10r 1983 <3o00 27 APR 7t 1983 <3 F00 27 MAY 5r 1983 <3o00 27 JUiH Sr 1983 <3+00 27 JUL 7r 1983 <7 F00 27 27 AUG SEP iit 14t 1983 1 9'83

<4r00

<Si00 27 OCT 13t 1983 <F 00 27 HOU 10r 1983 <6i00 27 DEC 14r 1983 <2r00 27 J*H 13r 1984 (4o00 28 AP.R 23. t 1 982 <ir00 28 MAY 20r 1982 <1o00 2S JUiH 17r 1982 <Si00

TabIe 4-2.5 (continued)

MATER ANALYSIS t CORALT-58 UNITS: r-C 1 /1 STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGMA 28 JUL 161 1982 <aat00 28 AUG 121 '982

<iat00 28 SEP 9r 1982 . <12t00 28 OCT 141 1982 <10.00 28 'HOV 161 1 982'982

<3t00 28 DEC 16r <4t00 28 JAH 141 1983 <2t00

'28 FER 101 1983 <3.00 28 MAR 101 1983 '<3. 00 2S APR 71 1983 <3+00 28 MAY 51 1983 <3+00 28 JUH 81 1983 <F 00

%8 JUL 7 1 1983 <F 00

.t 8 AUG 111 1983 <4t00 28 SEP 141 1983 '5t00 28 OCT 131 1983 <3t00 28 HOU 10r 1983 <2t00 28 DEC 14r 1983 'it80 18 JAH 13 ~ 1984 <4.00

'29 MAY 201 1982 <at00 29 JUH 171-1982 <25.00 29 JUL 16r 1982 <10t00 29 AUG 1'21 '9S2 <10.00 29 'SEP -'r:1982 <12t00

)9 OCT 141 1982 . SL NOU 161 1982 "<3 t 00 2.9 DEC 161 1982 <4+00 .

29'9 JAN 141 1983 <2+00 FER 101 1983 ...,. <3t00

" ."'<3 29 MAR 10r 1983..- t 00 29 APR 71 1983 <3t00 MAY 51 .1983 <3t00 29 JUH 8r 1983 <3t00

%9 JUL 71 1983 <10+00 29 AUG 111 1983 <4t00 29 SEP 14r 1983 <4t00 79 OCT 131 1983 <3t00 29 NOV 10r 1983 <3i00 29 DEC 141 1983 <at80 29 JAH 13r 1984 <4t00 31 MAR 251 1982 <1+00 31 JUH 17r 1982 <5t00 4-62

Tab1e 4-2.5 (continued),

WATER AHALYSIS:, CORALT-58 UHITS t F C'i/1 BTATIOH 'ATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 31 SEP 9r 1982 <12i00 31 DEC 27~ 1982'AR

<2o00 31 14~ 1983 <3i00 31 JUH 10'983 <7i00 31 BEP 14~ 1983 <Si00 3'1 DEC 14~ 1983 <3i 00 3 .l 3'7 MAR 25 '982 <1 F00 JUH 17~ 1982 <5 +00 32 SEP 9~ 1982 <12 F00 32 DEC 27~ 1982 <2 F00 3 .l MAR 14~ 1983 F00 JUH 10~ 1983 <4 F00 SEP 14r 1983 <5 F00 DEC 14 ~ 1'983 <6 F00 4-63

TabIe 4-2.6

'NALYSIS ~ COBALT-60 r Ci/1 UNITS'TATIOH DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 26 SEP 9r 1982 <8r00 26 OCT 14r 1982 <3r00 26 --NOV 16r 1982 <5r00 26 DEC 16r 1982 <4r00 JAH 14r 1983 <2o00 26 FEB 10r 1983 <4 r MAR 10r 1983 OG'4.00 26 APR 7r 1983 <4r00 26 MAY 5r 1983 <4 ~ 00 JUN 8r 1983 <4o00

. JUL 7r 1983 <4,00 I7 ~

4 AUG 11r 1983 <4r00 SEF 14r. 1983 <F 00

'1 6 OCT 13r 1983 <ir90 t7

~O NOV 10r 1983 <1 i 60 26 DEC 14r 1983 <ir70

'26 JAH 13r <4r00

~/ APR 23r 1982 <2 F00 27 MAY 20r 1982 <2r00 27 JUH 1982 <9 ~ 00

)7 JUL 16r 1982 <13o00

.l 7 AUG 12r 1982 <13.00 27 SEP 9r 1982 <12r00 27 ocr 14r 1982 <4.00 tf 7 NOV 16r 1982 <5r00 27 DEC 16r 1982 <4r00 27 JAH 14r 1983 <2r00 27 FEB 10r 1983 <4r00 27 MAR 10r 1983 <4+00 27 APR 7r 1983 <3r00

.l7 MAY 5r 1983 <4r00 27 JUN Sr 1983 <4r00 27 JUL 7 r 1983 <4r00 A7 AUG 11r 1983 <2.00 27 SEP 14r 1983 <6r00 27 OCT 13r 1983 <1r90 27 HOV 10r 1983 <4.00 27 DEC 14r 1983 <2+00 27 JAN 13r 1984 <4r00 28 APR 23r 1982 <1.00 28 MAY 20r 1982 <1.00 28 JUH 17r 1982 <9+00

Table 4-2..6 (continued)

MATER p ANALYSIS+

UNITS:

COBAL'T-60 r-C 1 /1 STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA P

28 ~ JUL 16r 1982 <13roo C 28 AUG 12r 15'82 <13r 00 28 SEP 1982 -

<8ooo 28 OCT 14r 1982 '<8roo 5 28 HOV 16r 1 5'82 <5roo 28 DEC 16r 1982 <4ooo 28 JAH 14r 1983 .<2r 00 28 FEB ior 1983 <6ioo Ii~

2Q BAR lor 15'83 <4>00'4roo 28 APR 71 1983 28 HAY 5r '983

<4roo P 28 JUiH 8t 1983 <4roo 28 JUL 7r 1983 <4 ioo

'1 28 8 AUG SEP iir 14r 15'83 1983

<2ioo

<3i00 28 OCT 13r 1983

~

<1+ 5'0 28 NOV ior 1983 <1r50 28 14r 1983 <1 r50 L 28 DEC JAH 13r 1 5'84 <4roo NAY 20r 1982 <2ioo

'19 JUH 17r 1982 .<8i 00 A9 JUL 16r 1982 <13.OO 29 AUG 12r 1982 <13ooo P9 SEP 9r 1982 <8 F 00 29 OCT 14r 1982 SL 29 iH OV'EC 16r 1982 <5ioo

.7 9 16r 1982 <4ooo 25'79 JAH 14r 1'983 <2ioo FEB 1Or 1983 <4roo HAR ior 1983 <4ooo gi 29 7r 1 5'83 <3roo HAY 5 ~ 1983 <4 ~ 00 29 JUN Sr 1983 <4roo 29 JUL 7r 1983 <4roo p 29 AUG SEP 14r 11r 1983 1983

<2ooo

<3roo 29 OCT 13r 1983 <ir90 HOV 10r 1983 ~

<3r 00 29 DEC 14r 1983 <ii70 JAH 13r 1 5'84 <4roo 31 HAR 25 t 1982 <1 ioo 31 JUN 17r 1982 <5'r 00

Tab1e 4-.2.6 (continued)

ANALYSIS 'OBALT-60 UNITS: sCi/1 STATIOH DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 31 SEP 9~ 1982 <8o00-31 DEC 27~ 1982, <3o00 31 OMAR 14~'983 <4'i 00 31 JUH 10~ 1983 <8i00 31 SEP 14'r 1983 <3 F00 31 DEC 14 r 1983 <2.00 MAR 25~ 1982 <1,00 32 JUN,'7~ 1982 <9.00

~

3? SEP 9>> 1982 <8i00 3'1 DEC 27r 1982 <3 ~ 00 3 MAR 14~ 1983 <3o00 32 JUN 10'983 <4.00 SEP 14'983 <3i00 32 DEC 14~ 1983 <6+00 52 SEP 14~ 1981 <Oiii

~t 4-66

Tab1e 4-2.7 MATER AHALYSIS: IODINE-131

'JHITS: r-Ci /I STATION DATE COHCEHTRA'Tl OH TMO SIGHA Cg OCT 5~ 1982 <Oi30 5 p FEB 22~ 1983 <Oo37 57 APR 5~ 1983 ~ <0i30 5+ SEP 27~ 1983 <0 i 27 4-67

Table 4-2.0:

MATER ANALYSIS: IRON-59 UNITS t t C 1/I STATION DATE CONCENTRATION - - 'MO SIGMA

26. SEP 9t 1982 <32+00 26 OCT 14t 1982 <iii00 26 NOV 26 t 1982 <6 iOO 26 DEC ahr 1982 <6 F00 26 JAH 14t 1983 <4 F00

,)

5 FEB10r 1983 <ht00 26 10t 1983 <5o00 26 APR 7t 2983 <ht00 MAY 5r 1983 <5t00 2h JUN 8t 1983 <6 F 00 JUL 7t 1983 <20o00

<<O P

AUG SEP lit '1983 14t 1983

<lb.00

<20.00 25 OCT 13r 1983 <9.00 26 NOV 10r 1983 <3 F 00 26 DEC 1'4 t 1983 <5+00 t6 JAH,13r 1984 <St00 27 23 t 1982 <3i00 27 MAY 20r 2982 <ht00 27'7 JUH 27r 2982 <'2 4+ 00 JUL ahr 1982 <25+00 P7 AUG 12r 1982 <28t00 27 SEP 9t 1982 <38.00 27 OCT a4 2982 <25i00 27 HOV 16t 1982 <6o00 2/ DEC ihr 2982 <6+00 27 14t 1983 <4+00 27 10r 1983 <ho00 27 MAR 10t 1983 <ht00 27 APR 7t a9s3 <4+00 27 MAY 5t 1983, <5t00 27 JUH 8t 2983 <6+00 27 JUL 7t 1983 <20t00 27 27 AUG SEP lit 1983 14r 1983 <la+00

<20o00 27 OCT 13r 1983 <9t00 27 HOV 10t 1983 <17i00 27 DEC 14t 1983 <5i00

~7 2984 <So00

'1 8 APR 23r 2'982 <4 ~ 00

'18 MAY 20t 1982 <3.00 28 JUH 17r 1932 <14 i 00 4-68

Table 4-2.Q

~

(conti.nued)

MATER ANALYSIS+ IRON-59 FCi/I UNITS'TATION DATE CON CEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 28 JUL 16r 1982 <29r00 28 AUG 12r 198> <28r00 2Q SEP 9r 1982 <32i00 28 OCT 14r 1982 <34+00 2Q HOV 16r 1982 <6r00 28 DEC 16r 1982'983 <5+00 JAN 14r <4r00 28 FEB 10r 19S3 <4o00 28 MAR 10r 1983 <So00 is APR 71 1983 <6r00

~

28 MAY 5r 1983 (5i00 28 JUH Sr 1983 <6r00 28 JUL 7 r 1983 <20o00 28 AUG llr 1983 <iao00 (13o00 2Q SEP 14r 1983 28 OCT 13r 1983 <9r00

'28 HOV 10r 1983 <7r00 28 DEC 14r 1983 <4 F00 Eg 28 JAH .13 r 1984 20'r 1982

<Q.o 00 29 MAY <2r00 29 JUH 17'r 1982 <93r00 JUL iver 1982 <25.00 29 AUG 12r 1982 <24r00

.i 9 SEP 9r 1982 <32.00 A9 OCT 14r 1982 SL 29 .NOV 16r 1982 <6r00 16r 1982 <5r00 E 29 JAH 14r 1983

~ <4r00 29 FEB ao. 1983 <6r00 MAR 10r 1983 <5+00 29 APR 7r a983 (4+00 MA'Y 5r 1983 <5r00 29 JUN Qr 1'983 <6r00 JUL 7 t 1983 <30r00 29 29 AUG SEP lir 14r 1983 1983

<iir00

<iir00 OCT 13r a9s3 <9r00 HOV 10r 1983 <10r00 29 DEC 14r 1983 (5+00 JAN 13r 1984 <8.00

~ l.

MAR 251 a9s2 <2o00 JUH 17r 1982 <14r00 4-69

.Table 4-2.3 (co'ntinued)

~ >r IRON-59 ANALYSIS e

'UNITS l 'Ci/I STATION DATE.. CON CEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 31 SEP 9~ 1982 ,<32o00 31 DEC 27~ 1982 <5o00 31 MAR 14~ 1983 <hi00 31 JUH 10 r 1983 <10)00.

<13 i 00',:.

~

31 SEP 14,~ 1983 ~

31 DEC 14~ 1'983 <7 F00

~ '2 32 MAR 25~

JUN 17~ 1982 1982 <3i00 (14 F00 32 .BEP 9 ~ 1982 '<32.00 42 DEC 27~ 1982'983

<5i00 MAR <4.00

.32 10~ 1983 14'UN

<10.00 sEp 14~ 1983 <13.00 DEC 14r 1933 <15i00 4-70

Tab1e 4-2.9

-: Y ANALYSIS: .LAHTHAHUM-140 UHITS e r-C i/ I ~ I STATION DATE CON CEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA L.

26 SEP 1982 <15+00 OCT 14t 1982 <5)00 HOV 16~ 1982 <14 ioo

<14 ioo I

DEC 16~ 1982 26 JAH 14t 1983 <aoeoo 26 t=E B aor 1983 <12ioo 26 MAR aors 1983 <12ooo 26 APR 7~ 1983 <9ioo 26 MAY . S~ 1983 <12ooo JUN Sr 1983 <9ooo

'JUL 7~ 1983 <14ioo 26 AUG ia~ 1983 <70ooo SEP a4~ 1983 <90.00 26 OCT 13~ 1983 <70.00 26 Hou ao, 1983 <70ioo DEc 14~ 1983 <14ioo 26 <13 ioo

\

27 APR 23~ 1982 <4ioo 27 MAY 1982 <7i 00 27 1982 <18 00 20'UH 17~ F 27 JUL 16~ 1982 <44ooo

'l 7 AUG 12r 1982 <43.00

)7 SEP 9~ 1982 <15'0 27 OCT 14~ 19S2 <hooo l7 HOP 16~ 1982 <14ooo 27 DEC 16~ 1982 <14ooo 27 JAt< 14'~ 1983 <ao.oo 27 FEB 10t 1983 <a2,oo 27 MAR 10~ 1983 <12eoo

'l 7 APR 7 f 19S3 <7+00 l7 5 't 1983 <12ioo L 27 MAY JUH St 1983 <9ioo 27 JUL 7f 1983 <15ioo 27 AUG air 1983 <50ooo 27 sEp 14~ 1983 <90ooo 27 ocT -13r, 1983 <70ooo 27 HOu 1983 <ahoooo

<14ioo 10~'EC 27 14~ 1983 E 27 JAH 13~ 1984 <13ioo 28 *F'R 23 1 1982 <hioo 28 MAY 20r 1982 <4ooo

'18ioo

)e 28 ,JUH 17r 19S2 4-71

abl e.4-2. 9

~

contirued)~

WATER AH AL'YS I S: LANTHANUM-f 40 UHITSi r-Ci /1 STAT IOt< DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 28 JUL 16r 1982 <50r00

.l 8 AUG 12r 1982 ~

<48r00 28 SEP 9r 1982 <15+00 28 OCT 14r 1982 <14r00 28 NOV 16r, 1982, <14+00 28 DEC 16r 1982 <14 r 00 28 JAH 14r 1983 <10.00 28 10r 1983 <12.00 28 10r 1983 <12r00 28 APR 7r 1983 <9r00 28 ~ MAY 51 1983 <12r 00 28 JUH 81 1983 <9.00 .

28 JUL 7r 1983 <19r00 28 AUG 1'1 r 1983 <50.00 28 SEP 14r 1983. <60r00 28 ~

OCT 13r 1983 <70r00.

28 HOV 10r 1983 <70o00 28 DEC 14r 1983 <14r00 28 JAH '984

<13r00 A9 MAY 20r 1982 <3.00 JUH 17r 1982 <15r00

.l 9 JUL 16r 1982 <44r00 AUG 12r 1982 <40o00 SEP 9r 1982 <15r00 29 OCT 14r 1982 SL 29 NOV 16r 1982 <14+00 29 DEC 16r 1982 <14r00 29 JAH 14r 1983 <10r00 29 FEB 10r 1983 <12+00 29 MAR 10r 1983 <13r00 29 *PR 71 1983 <7r00

'79 MAY 5r 1983 <12+00 29 JUH Sr 1983 <9r00 JUL 7t 1983 ~

<15r00 AUG 11r 1983 <50o00 SEP 14r 1983 <40r00 29 OCT 13r 1983 <70r00 HOV 10r 1983 <ffOo00 29 DEC f4r 1983 <13o00 JAH 13r, 1984 <13r00 31 MAR 25r 1982 <4o00 31 JUH 17r 1982 <19.00 4-72

Table 4-2.9 (continued)

MATER ANALYSIS+ THANUM-140 i UNITS'AH r-C i/I STATIOH DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA E

P 31 SEP 9r 1982 / <15r00 31 DEC 27r 1982 ~ <13~00 31 MAR 14 ~ 1983 <F 00 31 JUH 10r 1983 ~

<14+00 31 SEP 14 1983 <60i00 31 14r 1983 r'EC

<20o00 3 PP MAR 25r 1982 '<6r00 32 JUH 17r 1982 <19 F00 32 SEP 9r 1982 <15o00 32 DEC 27r 1982 <13o00 32 MAR 14r 1983 <6i00 3l JUH 10r ~ 1'983 <13'00

'SEP 14r 1983 <60r00

~ g DEC 14r 1983 <30i00 L'

P

Table 4-2.10 ANALYSIS: MANGANESE-54 UNITS o sCi/I STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGMA 26 SEP 9t 1982 <9r00 26 OCT 14r 1982 <3+00 HOU ihr'6r 1982 <3o00 26 DEC 1982 <3r00 26 JAH 14t 1'983 <2r00 10t 1983 <3r00 FEB 26 MAR 10r 1983 <3o00 26 APR 7f 1983 <3r00 26 MAY 5t 1983 <3o00 26 JUN 8r ~

1983 <3.00

~ 'r 6 JUL 7t 1983 <4 '00 26 AUG SEP iir 14t 1983 1983

'<5.00

<5o00 OCT 13t 1983 <1.80 e HOV 10.r 1983. <1.50 DEC 14t

~ 1983 ...<1r70 JAH 13t 1984 <3+00 27 APR 23 t 1982 <1r00 l7 MAY 20t 1982 <3s00

~/ JUH 17t 1982 <5 F00 27 JUL lht 1982 <11o00

'.r 7 AUG 12t 1982 <13~00 27 SEP 1982 <iir00 27 OCT 14r 1982 <F 00 27 HOV let 1982 '3o00 27 DEC 16t 1982 <3r00 A7 JAN 14t 1983 <2r00 27 FEB 10t 1983 <3r00 27 MAR 10t 1983 <3.00 27 APR 7~ 1983 <3r00 2l P) I MAY 5t 1983 <3o00 27 JUN St 1983 <3+00 27 JUL 7r 1983 <4r00 27 AUG iir 1983 <3r00 27 SEP 14r 1983 <hi00 27 OCT 13t 1983 <1 F 80 27 HOV 10r 1983 <4r00

'1 7 DEC 14r 1983 <lr80 27 JAH 13t 1984 <3r00 28 APR 23t 1982 <2 F00 28 MAY 20r 1982 <2o00 JUH 17r 1982 <5i 00 4-74

Table 4-2.10 (continued)

. ANALYSIS:

UNITS:"

MANGANESE-54 rCi/I STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGMA I~

28 . JUL 16t 1982 <14.00 28 AUG 12t 1'982 (14.00 28 SEP 9r 1982 (9i00 28 OCT 14t 1982 <16+00 28 HOV 16t 1982 <3 00 F

28 DEC 16t 1982 <3t00 28 JAH 14t 1983 00 28 10t 1983 <3t00 28 MAR 10r 1983 <3t00 28 APR 7r 1983 , <3r00 28 MAY 5t 1983 <3i00 t3 JUH 8t 1983 <3.00 28 JUL 7 t 1983 <4i00

.l 8 AUG 11 t 1983 <3 ~ 00 28 SEP 14r 1983 <4.00 28 OCT 13r* 1983 <1+80 28, 28, .

NOV 10t DEC 14t 1983 1983

~

<1 i50

<1' 50 28 -

JAH 13 1984 . -...<3 t 00 29 MAY 20r 1982 <it00 JUN 17t 1982 (11 t00 29 JUL 16t 1982 <11t00

'7 9 AUG 12t 1982. <iio00 SEP 9t 1982 <F 00 29 OCT 14t 1982 SL 29 HO<) 16r 1982 <3t00 DEC 15t 1982 <3 t00 JAH 14t 1983 <2r 00'3 l9 FEE< 10t 1983 i 00 29 MAR 10r 1983 <3t00 29 APR 7t 1983 <3r00 29 MAY 1983 <3t00 29 JUN St 1983 <3t00

'1 9 JUL 7t 1983 <5t00 29 29 AUG SEP iit

,14 r 1983 1983

<3t00

<3t00 29 OCT 13t 1983 <1 t80 29 HOV 10r 1983 <3i00 29 DEC 14t 1983'984 (it50 o9 JAH 13r <3i00 31 MAR 25t 1982 <it00 31 JUH 17t 1982 <5t00 4-75

Table 4-2.10 (continued)

MATER ANALYSIS+'ANGANESE-54 UNITS: r-Ci/I STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGMA 31 SEP 9 r,1982 <9r00 31 , DEC 27r 1982 <F 00 31 MAR 14r 1983 <3+00 3 i .'UN 10r 1983 <6o00.

SEP 14r '1983 31 31 'EC 14r 1983

<4r00

<2r00 32 MAR 25r 1982 <lo00 32 'JUN 17. 1982 <Sr00 SEP 1982 <9r00 32 DEC 27r 1982 <2.00 32 MAR 14r 1983 <3+00 3 .) J,UH 10r 1983 <F 00 SEP 14r 1983 <4r00 DEC 14r 1983 <5i00

f' Table 4-2.11 WATER

- AHALYSIS:

JHITS o HIOBIUM-95 r-c i /I STATION DATE CON CEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA

~ i SEP 1982 <as,oo Ii 26 OCT 14r 1982 <4+00 HOV 1hr 1982 <3roo 26 DEC 16. 1982 <3roo 26 JAH 14r 1983 <2roo FEB ior 1983 <3r00 26 MAR 10r 1983 <Shoo 26 APR 7t 1983 <3 ioo MAY 5r 1983 <shoo 26 JUN '8r 1983 . <3+00

~

~

26..

~76, JUL AUG 7r 1983 iir 1983 * '" <hi04

<6 r 00 SEF'CT 14r 1983 <8.00 13r 1983 <3roo 26 HOV 10r 1983 <sroo 26 DEC 14r 1983 <2roo JAH 13r 1984 <4roo 27 23 t 1982 <aroo 27 MAY 20r 1982 <3roo

,77 JUH 17 ~ 1982 <5roo L: 27 JUL 16 r 1982, <ioroo It AUG ~ 12r 1982 <13roo 27 SEP 9r 1982 <14 too 27 OCT 14r 1982 <5+00 27 HOV 1ht 1982 <3roo A7 DEC 16r 1982 <3r00

~ PC 27 JAH 14r 1983 <2ioo 27 FEB aor'.1983 <3roo A7 MAR aor 1983 <3roo 27 APR 7 r,::19,83 <3roo 27, MAY 5r 1983 <3ioo

'17 JUH 8,".. a983 <sroo A7 JUL 7t 1983 <7 o'00 27 AUG. aar'983 <4roo 27 SEP a;4r. 1983 ~ <9roo 27 OCT '.13 r,1983 <3roo 27 HOV'.'10 t 1983 <6roo A7 DEC.,a4 r 1983 <2+00 27 JgH isr 1984 <4roo 28 APR 231 19,82 <4roo 28:

I ~ 28:.

MAY

'JUH 20r 1982 17r 1982

<1roo

<5roo 4-77

Tabl'e 4-2.11 (continued)

MATER ANALYSIS: HIOB IUM-95 UNITS h r.C 1/I STATIOt< DATE COHCEHTRAT'IOH TMO SIGMA 28 JUL 16r 1982 <14h00 28 AUG 12r 1982 <13+00 28 SEP 9r 1982 ... <13+00 28 OCT 14r 1982, <12+00 2Q ~

HOU lhr 1982 <3h00 28 DEC 16r 1982 <4+00 28 JAN 14r 1983 <2h00 28 FEB 10r 1983 <3 F00 28 MAR 10r 1983 <3h00 APR 7r 1983 <3.00 28 MAY 5r 1983 <3h00 28 JUH Qr 1983 <3 ..00

.l 8 JUL 7 r 1983 <7h00 28 AUG 1983 <4h00 2Q ,SEP 14r 1983 <5h00 28 OCT 13r 1983 <3r00 28 HOV 10r 1983 <2.00 28 DEC 14r 1983 <ih80 28 JAN 13r 1984 <4h00 f79 h MAY 20r 1982 <1 ~ 00 29 JUH 17r 1982 <29.00 JUL ihr 1982 . <10.00

..29 AUG 12r. 1982 ...<1'0+ 00 SEP 9r 1982 ~ <13+00 29 OCT 14r 1982 SL A9 NOV ihr 1982 <3h00 DEC lhr 1982 <4h00 JAN 14r 1983 <2h00 29 FEB 10r 1983 <3h00 29 tlAR 10r 1983 <3 h'00 29 APR 7r 1983 <3h00 29 MAY 51 1983 <3h00 29 JUH 8r 1983 <3h00 JUL 7r 1983 <F 00 29 AUG SEP lir 1983 14r 1983

<4h00

<4r00 OCT 13r 1983 <3h00 HOV 10r 1983 <4h00 29 DEC 14r 1983 <2h00 JAH 13r 1984 <4h00 MAR 25 t 1982 <2h00 JU t< 17r 1982 <5.00 4-78

Table 4-2.11 t

(continued)

WATER ANALYSIS: NIOBIUM-95 UNITS: s Ci/1 STAT IOH DATE COHCEHTRAT,I'OH TWO SIGMA 31 SEP 9r 1982 <13o00 31 DEC 27r 1982 <2i00 '

31 MAR 14r 1983 <3i,00-'6.i'00 31 JUH 10r 1983 31 DEC 14r 1983 <2'i 00 32 MAR 25r 1982 <'4 i 00'<S 32 JUN. 17r 1982 e 00 32 SEP 9r 1982 <13i00 32 DEC 27r 1982 <2i00 32 MAR 14r 1983 <2.00 32 JUN 10r 1983 <4r00 DEC 14r 1983 <6i00 4-79

Tabl e 4-2.12 MATER ANALYSIS+ STRONTIUM-89 UNITS: eCi/I STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGM*

26 SEP 14~

1983'EP

<120+00 14~ 1983 <300i00 28 'EP 14> 1983 <150o00 29 SEP 14~ 1983 4-80

Table 4-2. 13

. At<At YSIS o UHITS:

STROt<T IUH.-90 r-Ci/I STATIOH D*TE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGNA 26 SEP 14'983 <io20 27 SEP 14t 1983 <3+00 28 SEP 14 ~ 1983 <2o00 SEP 14'983

~

52 OCT 5~ <Oi06 L g FEB 22~ 1983 0i Oi 17 5+ APfi 27'982 24'Oo65 5 ~ 1983 p Cg SEP 1983 Oi44 Oi19 E

L" 4-81

Tab1e 4-Z.14 WATER AHALYSIS t TIH-113 UH ITS: eCi/I STATION DATE QOHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA HOV ao~ 1983 6o4'0 3i10 I

HOV 10t 1983 'D.

28 HOV 10~ 1983 HD 29 Hoi) 10'983 4-82

( ~v Table 4-2.15 MATER

c. ANALYSIS l UNITS:

TRITIUH IH SURFACE/DRIHKIHG r-Ci/1 MATER STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGNA

.75 JUN 17r 1982 HS SEP Gr 1982 <800o00 DEC 16r 1982 <500i00 HAR 10r,1983 270i00 150e00 7 6 JUH, Sr-1983 <330i00 26 SEP 14r 1983 HA 14r 1983 <300o00 I A7 27:.

DEC JUN SEP 17r 8r 1982 1982

~ <700.00

<80',00 A7 DEC 16r 1982 500r00 200.00

~

27 NAR 10r 1983 510i00 '220.00 27 JUN Sr 1983 <330o00 27 SEP 14r 1983 .HA 27 DEC 14 r 1983 <300.00 28 JUH 17r 1982 <700o00 28 SEP Sr 1982 <820i00 L 28 28 DEC 16 1982 BAR'10 r 1983

<500o00 220i00 150i00 28 JUH Sr 1983 <310i00 p 28 SEP 14r 1983 ~

HA

,28 DEC 14r 1983 230i00 170o00

'1 9 JUH 17r 1982 <700.00 29 SEP Sr 1982 <820 i 00 29 DEC 16r 1982 <500 00 F

29 MAR 10r 1983 260o00 150e00 29'9 JUH 8r 1983 <330i00 SEP 14r 1983 HA 29 DEC 14r 1983 390i00 170i00

%";l 4-83

Tab'te 4-2.16 MATER ANALYSIS: TRITIUM IH GROUND MATER UNITS: t Ci/1 STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TMO SIGMA 31 MAR 25t 1982 <230 i 00 31 JUN 17r 1982 <700r00 31 SEP 9t 1982, <1300+00 31 DEC 27 r 1982 <440r00 31 MAR 14r 1983 <300'0 .

31 JUH 10 r 1983 2600r00 300 F00 31 SEP 14r 1983 <300r00 31 DEC 14r 1983 <300+00 3A MAR 25t 1982 <230o00 44 JUN 17r 1982 <700i00 .

3 w) SEP 9r 1982 <1300.00 3P DEC 27r 198~ <'440.00 32 MAR 14t 1983

<300.00 32 JUN 10r 1983 1400rOQ 300+00 32 SEP 14r 1983 <300i00 3 7 DEC 141 1983 <300rOO

'52 JAH 1980 270r00 120t00

'+

MAR 4r 1980

~ 330 i 00 190 F 00 JUL St 1980 90r00 90o00 C'

a OCT ir 1980 <110 00 F

C 4 JAH 5t 1981 520.00 190o00 L g MAR 30r 1981 230+00 170r00 52 JUL 14r 1981 360i00 220.00 5+ SEP 14r 1981 <10r00 OCT 13t 1981 280o00 160.00 C'

aJ2 JAH 5t 1982 190r00 180o00 52 MAR 30r 1982 200o00 130i00 52 JUL 6r 198> <150r00 52 OCT 5t 1982 <260 i 00 52 FEB 22t 1983 <210o00 5 t APR 5t 1983 290r00 210o00 52 SEP 27 t 1983 330+00 210.00 4-.84

Tab1e 4-2.17 ANALYSIS t ZINC-65 UNITS: s Ci/I STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGNA 9r 1982 <a7.oo 26 OCT 14r 1982 <6 F 00

-26 HOV acr 1982 <3roo 26 DEC 16r 1982 <5ioo 26 JAH 14r 1983 <Sroo 26 FEB ior 1983 <c'ii 00 MAR ior 1983 <6roo 26 APR 7r 1983 <6 F 00 26 HAY 5r 1983 <6roo 26 JUN Sr 1983 <6roo 26 JUL 7r 1983 <9roo 26 AUG 11r 1983 <9roo

<<0 SEP 14r 1993 <aaroo 26 OCT 13r 1983 <4.00 HOV aor 1983 <4roo 26 DEC 14r 1983. <4soo 26 JAN 1984 <7roo A7 APR 231 1982 <2ioo '

27 MAY 20r 1982 '6roo A7 JUH 17r 1982 <13ooo 27 JUL 16r 1982 <20<00 P7 AUG 12r 1982 <27roo 27 SEP 9r 1982 <20roo

')7 OCT 14r, 1982 <7roo 27 HOV 16r- 1982 <3roo 27 DEC 16r 1982 <5roo 27 JAN 14r 1983 <Sroo 27 FEB 10r 1983 <6roo 27 MAR 10r 1983 <6ooo 27 APR 71 1983 <5roo 27 HAY 5r 1983 <6ioo

'27 JUH Br 1983 -'6ioo 27 JUL 7t 1983 <11 r 00 27 AUG iir 14r 1983 1983

<6 ioo

<12roo 27 SEP ~

17 OCT 13r 1983 <4roo 27 NOV 10r 1983 <9ioo 27 DEC 14r 1983 <4ooo 27 JAH 13r 1984 <7roo 28 APR 23 t 1982 <SrQO 28 HAY 20r 1982 <Si00 28 JUN 17r 1982 <13i00

Table 4-2.17 (continued)

MATER ANALYSIS: ZINC-65 UNITS: F Ci/I STATION CONCENTRATION TMO SIGMA 28 JUL'UG 16>> 1982 28 12>> 1982 <27+00 28 SEP 9r 1982 <17+00 28 OCT 14r 1982 '15>>00 28 HOV 16>> 1982 <3>>00

,28 DEC 16>> 1982 <6.00

~8 JAN a4>> 1983 <3>>00 2S 10>> 1983'27t00 1983 <3.00'6>>00 28 10>> 1983

- 28 71 1983 <6>>00 28 MAY 5>> 1983 <6>>00 28 JUN St 1983 <6>>00 28 JUL 7>> 1983 <11.00 23 AUG 11>> 1983 <6>>00

%8 SEP 14 t <8>>00 28 OCT 13>> 1983 <4>>00

.t8 HOV 10>> 1983 <3>>00 28 DEC 14r 1983 <3o00

)8 JAH 13>> 1984 <7>>00 29 MAY 20>> 1982 <2 F00 29 JUN 17>> 1982 <22>>00 29 JUL 16>> 1982 <20 i 00 29 AUG 12>> 1982 <20.00 29 SEP 9>> 1 '982 <17>>00 29 OCT 14>> 1982 SL 29 HOV 16r 1982 <3 00~

29-; DEC 16r 1982 <6>>00 29:: JAH 14>> 1983 <3i00 29 ..'EB 10>> 1983 <6>>00 29 'MAR 10>> 1983 <6>>00 29:.' APR 7t 1983 <5>>00 29,' MAY 5>> 1'983 <6+00 29: . - 'JUN Sr 1983 <6>>00 2'P, JUL 7t 1983 <10>>00 29

.'29 AUG SEP iir 1983 14>> 1983

<3o00

<6>>00

': 29 OCT 13>> 1983 <4>>00 Q9 NOV 10>> 1983 <7>>00

,

29 DEC 14r 1983 <3>>00

'29 JAH 13>> 1984 <7>>00 31 MAR 25t 1982 <2>>00 31 JUH 17>> 1982 <13 >>00

Table 4-2.17 (continued)

ANALYSIS: ZINC-65 UNITS o r Ci/1 STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA

~

31 SEP 1982 <17o00 31 'EC 27~ 1982 <4i00 31 MAR 14,r 1983 <bi00 31 JUH 10~ -1983 <13i00 31 SEP 14~ 1983 <8o00 31 DEC 14r 1983 <4o00 32 MAR 25~ 1982 <3o00 JUH 17t 1982 <13.00 32 SEP 9~ 1982 <17o00 DEC '982

<4i00 .

14~ 1983 <5o00 27'AR 32 JUH 10~ 1983 <F 00 Ok SEP 14 1983 <8.00 14~ 1983 <12+00

~'EC SEF 14 ~ 1981. <lo38 4-87

Table 4-2.18 MATER ANALYSIS: ZIRCONIUM-95 UNITS l r-Ci/1 STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGMA 26 ~

SEP 9t 1982 <29ioo OCT 14t 1982 <iotoo 26 HOV &6t 1982 <7 ioo DEC 16t 1982 <7ooo 26 JAH 14r 1983 <4roo 26 FEB 10 r "'983 <7+00 26 MAR 10r 1983 <7ioo 25 APR 7t 1983 <6+00 26 MAY 5t 1983 <7roo '

26 JUN 81 1983 <7 ~ 00 26 JUL 7 ~ 1983 <11.00 26 26 AUG SEP iir'983 14 1983 <11.00

<13ooo

~

A6 QCT 13r 1983 <5.00 26 DEC 14't 1983 <4ioo 26 JAH 13r 1984 <6roo 27 APR 23 t 1982 <2 ioo

~7 MAY 20r 1982 <7ioo 27 JUH 17r 1982 <'12 i 00

'7 7 JUL 16t 1982 <23.00 27 AUG 12r 1982 <29roo 27 SFP 1982 <34.00 27 OCT 14r 1982 <13ioo 27 NO<) 16t 1982 <7- '00 "

27 DEC 16r 1982 <7 o 004ooo 27 JAN 14t 1983 27 FER iot 1983 <7too 27 MAR iot 1983 <6roo APR 7t 1983 <5ooo 27 MAY 5r 1983 <7 ioo 27 JUH 8r 1983 <7.i 00

.27 JUL 7t 1983 <13+00

.) '7 27 AUG SEP iir 14t 1983 1983

<7roo

<14+00 .

27 OCT 13t 1983 <5ioo 27 DEC 14t 1983 <4ioo 27 JAH 13t 1984 <6i 00 28 APR 23t 1982 <4ioo 28 MAY 20r 1982 <4ooo 28 JUN 17t 1'982 <12.oo 28 JUL 16r 1982 <30roo 28 AUG 12r 1982 <29+00 4-88

Table 4-2.18 (continued)

WATER ANALYSIS: ZIRCONIUM-95 UNITS l r-Ci/1 STATION DATE . COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 28 SEP 1982 <29o00 28 OCT 14t 1982 <29.00 28 NOV 16r 1982 <7i00 28 DEC 16t 1982 <St00 28 JAH 14t 1983 <4i00 28 FEB 10r 1983 <7i00 28 MAR aot 1983 <7 F00 28 APR 7t 1983 <6+00 E 28 MAY St 1983 <7t00 28 .JUH Sr 1983 <7o00 28 JUL 7f 1983 <13i00 28 28 AUG SEP llr 14r 1983 1983

~ <7w00

<9.00 OCT 13r 1983 <5.00 28 DEC 14t 1983 <3 F00 28 JAH 13r 1984 <6 F00 29 20t 1982 <2 i ge 29 29 29 MAY JUH JUL'UG 17r 1982 16r 1982 12r 1982

<23o00 00'<63t00

<23 i 00 29 SEP 9t 1982 <29'0 29 OCT 14r 1982 SL P9 HOV 16t 1982 <7 00

~

'1 9 DEC 16r 1982 <Si00 P9 JAH 14r 1983 <4 F00 29 FEB 10r 1983 <7i 00 l9 10t 1983 .<7 F00 29 APR 71 1983 <5t00 A9 MAY 5t 1983 <7o00 29 JUH t 1983 <7 F 00 29 JUL 7 t '1983 <16+00 29 AUG 11t 1983 <7i00 29 SEP 14r 1983 <7i00 29 OCT 13r 1983 <5t00 29 DEC 14t 1983 <3+00 29 JAN 13r 1984 <6t00 Lf;, 31 MAR 25 t 1982 <2o00 31 JUN 17t 1982 <lit00 31 SEP 9t 1982 <29+00 31 ~ DEC 27 r 1'982 <5+00 14t 1983

'1 MAR <6+00 L'-89 31 JUN 10r 1983 ' <10i00

Table 4-2.18 (cont'inued)

MATER AHALYSIS s ZIRCOHIUH 95 UNITS: eCi/I STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGHA 31 SEP 14 ~ 1983 <9o00 31 DEC 14'983 <4i00 NAR 25~ 1982 <4o00

'3A JUH 17~ 1982 <ii.F00 32 SEP 9~ 1982 <29.00 DEC 27~ 1982 '<5 o 00 32 MAR 14~ 1983 <5.00

~ '2'2 JUH 10 r 1983 <7i00 SEP 14~ 1983 <F 00 32 DEC 14r 1983 <10i00

Tab1e 4-3.0 SEDIMEHT

( AHALYS IS+

UH ITS:

ACT IHIUM-228 r-Ci lk 8 STATIOH DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGViA 5'3 33 34 34 MAY HOV MAY, HOV 3~

it 3~

1983

'1983 1983 1r 1983.

830.00 HD HD 440o00 200i00 280i00

Table 4-3.1 :l SEDIMEHT AHALYSISo BISHUTH-.214

,UNITS: s Ci/l'.5 STATION 'ATE CONCENTRATION TblO SIGVi*

.l 33 HAY 3~ 1983 880o00 130o00 ~ C3 33 HOV 1~ 1983 350i00 ihOe00 34 NAY 3~ 1983 430i00 150+00 34 HOV 1,~ 1983 620 o 0.0 '150.00 5

Table 4-3.2 SEDIMENT ANALYSIS'ESIUM-134 UNITS! '-Ci/k5 STATION DATE 'ONCENTRATION TMO SIGMA 33 HOV 5~ 1982 '<150i00 33 MAY 3~ 1983 <50i00 .

33 MAY 3~ 1983 <100o00 33 NOV i.~ 1983 <140i00 34 NOV 5~ 1982 <150 i 00 34 MAY 3r 1983 <50i00 34 MAY 3~ 1983 <130i00 34 'OV i~ 1983 130o00

Table 4-3.3 SEDIHENT ANALYSIS i CES IUH-137 UNITS e r Cilk<

STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGHA 33 17r 1978 360roo a3o,oo

.33 DEC 21 r 1978 220ooo 50roo 33 JUL ior 1979 3ioioo 70+00 33 HOV 19r 1979 310+00 60ioo 33 HAY Sr 1980 200roo 40roo 33 NOV 18r 1980 160ioo 20roo 33 HAY 8 r 1981 <150 00 F

33 NOV 19r 1981 200roo aoo+00 o3 HOU 5r 198~> <180roo 33 HAY 3r 1983 <50ooo 33 HAY 3r 1983 180+00 50.00 33 NOV I r 1983 <130roo 34'AY D4 34 HAY 17r NOV 27r 1978 1978 380roo 490+00 90 00

~

90+00 34 JUL 10r 1979 4~0 00 80 00 F

34 HOU 19r 1979 480ooo 70roo 34 HOV. 18r 1980 <150 i 00 34 HAY 8r.. 1981 500ooo 100.00 34 HOV .19r 1981 100roo 100roo 34 HOV 5r 1982 31oioo, 90 00 F

34 HAY 3r 1983 500.00 aoo,oo HAY 3r 1983 560+00 90+00 NO'V 1 r 1983 26oooo 80oOO

Table 4-3.4 SEDIVENT ANALYSIS: COBALT-58 UNITS f s Ci/ka STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGH*

33 NAY 17r 2978 <150 00 E 33 DEC 21r 1978 <150roo 33 JUL 10 r 1979 <250ioo 33 NOU 29r 1979 <150roo 33 MAY, Sr 1980 <150ioo 33 NOV 18r 1980 <150 r 00 33 HAY Sr 1981 <150roo 33 HOV 19r 1981 <150roo 34 HAY 27r a978 <150roo 34 HOV 27r 19.78 <150ooo 34 JUL aor 1979 <150.00 34 HOV 19 r 1979 <250ooo 34 ,HOU 28r 1.980 <a5o,oo 34 MAY 8r 1981 <150.00 34 HOV 19r 1981 <a5o.oo i

FOOTNOTE'TATION 34 NOU 19r 1979r COBALT-57 170 00 40 00 i

Table 4-3 5- .

SEDIMENT. "..

AHALYSIS'OBALT-60 UNITS'<<r-Ci/k5 STATIOH DATE CONCENTRATION TWO,SIGMA 33 MAY 17 ~ 1978 590ioo . 2aoioo 33 DEC 21~ 1978 <150'0 33 33 33 33 MAY HOV

't JUL ao~ 1979 HOV 19~ 1979 18~

1980 1980 130 F 00 130ioo

<150ooo

<150eoo 60 ioo 50+00 It 33 MAY 8 s 1981 <iso,oo 33 NOV 19'981 <a50ooo 34 MAY 17~ 1978 ~ 320 i 00 aaoioo 34 HOV 27 ~ 1978 380 i 00 .110ioo 34 JUL ao~ 1979 460>00 120.00 34 HOV 19~ 1979 610 00 F 110.00 34 NOV 18~. 1980 <150.00 34 MAY 8 t 1981 <150eoo 34 HOV 19t 1981 '<150 ioo

Table 4-3.6 7

SEDIMENT ANALYSIS t LEAD-212 A r-C i/k5 UHITS'TATION DATE CON CEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 33 MAY 3~ 1983 710+00 80>00 33 HOV 1~ 1983 '510+00 150i00 34 MAY 3~ 1983 570.00 110.00 34 HOV i~ 1983 470o00 120 i 00 L'-97

Tab1e 4-3.7 SEDIMEHT AHALYSIS e LEAD-214 UH ITS: t Ci/kd STATION COHCEHTRATIOH TMO SIGHA 33 MAY 3~ 1983 850o00 130i00 33 'O<) i~ i983 490+00 160o00 34 HAY 3~ 1983 470+00 140o00 34 - HOV ir 1983 520i00 150i00 4-98

Table 4-3.8

~ /

t/"

SEDIMENT

. ANALYSIS: HANGAHESE-54 UNITS A r Ci/kd STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGNA L Y

/

p:-:,: 33 HAY 17'978 <150+00 33 DEC 21~ 1978 <150A00 33 JUL ios 1979 <a5o.oo 33 NOV 19'979 <150AOO 33 MAY Ss 1980 <a5o,oo 33 NOV 18'980 <150S00 33 MAY 8s 1981 <150A00 jj'. 33 HOV 19'981 <150+00 MA'Y 17'978 <150AOO 34 HOV 27'978 <150A00 34 , JUL 10 s 1979 <150A00 34 HOV 19 1979 <150.00 34 HOV 18s 1980 <150.00 34 HAY 8r 1981 <150ioo L. 34 HOV 19 1981 <150ioo L'e

SEDIMENT AHALYSIS: HIOBIUM-95 UHITSl'-Ci/k5 STATION DATE COHCEHTRAT ION TWO SIGMA 33 MAY 17r 1978 <150i00 33 DEC 2ir 1978 <150 F00 33 JUL10r .1979 <150i00 33 HOV 19r 1979 '150i00 33 MAY 8r 1980 <150i00 33 33 HOV 18r 1,980 MAY 8 r 1981

<150 '0

<150 ~00 33 HOV 19 r 1981 <150o00 34 MAY 17r 1978 <150i00 34 HOV 27r 1978 <150+00 34 JUL 10r 1979 <150.00 34 NOV 19r 1979 <150i00 34 HOV 18r 1980 <150 00 F

34 MAY 8r 1981 <150o00 34 HOV 19>> 1981 <150o00 4-100

Table 4-3.10 SEDIMEHT ANALYSIS+ POTASSIUM-40 UH I TS: r-C 1/kN STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 33 MAY 17r 1978 12000 i 00 3000o00 33 DEC 2ir'978 li000o00 2000o00 33 HOV 18r 1980 13000s00'8000o00 1000i00 33 MAY 8r 1981 2000i00 33 HOV 19r 1981 14200i00 1400,00 33 HO'V 5r 1982 19000>00... 2000.00 33 MAY 3r 1983 19000i00 3000i00 33 MAY 3r 1983 19000i00 2000+00 33 HOV ir 1983 17000i00 2000i00 34 MAY 17r 1978 10000r00 .~000.00 HOV 27r 1978 21000r00 -

209.0.+ 00 ~ ~

34 HOV 18r 1980 HR 34 ~ MAY Sr 1981 13000>00 34 HOV 19r 1981 16900+00 1700.00 34 HQV 5r 1982 24000 00 F 2000i00 34 MAY 3r 1983 21000i00 3000o00.

34 MAY 3r 1983 12000o00 2000.00 34 HOV '1 r 1983 17000o00 2000i00 4-101

SEDIMENT AHALYSISe RADIUM-226 UHZTS: sCi/k5 STATIOH COHCEHTRATI OH TWO SIGMA 33 MAY 3i 1983 860 i 00. 130 00 F

33 . HOU i~ i983 420o00 160+00 34 MAY 3~ 1983 450 ~ 00 140i00 34 HOV ir 1983 570o00 150i00 4-102

SEDIMENT ANALYSIS 3 THALLIUM-208 UNITS l r-Ci/k~

STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 3 MAY 3~ 1983 800e00 160.00 33 NOV 1 ~ 1983 700o00 210 i 00 34 MAY 3~ 1983 630o00 210o00 34 NOV 1~ 1983 770i00 220.00

~ ~

Table 4-3.13 SEDIMENT ANALYSIS: ZINC-65 UNITS l r Cilkl STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TMO SIGMA 33 'AY 17r 1978 <1SO,OO 33 DEC 21 r 1978 <150 r 00 33 JUL ior 1979 <150i00 33 HOV 19r i. 979 <150+00 33 MAY 8r 1980 <1SO.OO 33 HOV 18r 1980 <150roo 33 MAY 8r 1981 <isoroo 34 MAY 17r 1978 * <isoooo 34 HOV 27r 1978 370roo iloooo 34 JUL 10r 1979 <isoooo l4 NOV 19r 1979 <150 ioo HOV 18r 1980 <150.00

~4 MAY Sr 1981 '<150roo 4-104

Table 4-3. 14 SEDIMENT ANALYSISe ZIRCOHIUM-95 UH I TS: r-C 1/k5 STATION DATE CON CEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 33 MAY 17r 1978 <150o00 33 DEC 2ir 1978 <150iO'0 33 JUL 10r 1979 <150 00 F

33 HOV 19r 1979 <150r00 33 MAY Sr 1980 <150o00 33 HOV 18r 1980 <150o00 33 MAY Sr 1981 <150+00 33 HOV 19r 1981 <150r00 34 MAY 17 r 1978 <150 00 F

34 HOV 27r 1978 <150i00 34 JUL 10r .1979 <150 F00 34 ,

HOV 19r 1979 <150.00 34 HOV 18r 1980 <150o00 34 'AY 8r 1981 <150o00 34 HOV 19r 1981 <150i00 4-105

SOIL AHALYSISt ACTIHIUM-228 UNITS: r.Ci/kd STATIOH DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TMO SIGMA 1 MAY 31 ~ 1983 840>00 250 o'00 7 MAY 31 ~ 1983 820o00 310.00 9 MAY 31~ 1983 700o00 250 00 F

21 MAY 31~ 1983 580i00 2hOo00 23 MAY 31~ 1983 4-106

Table 4-4.1 SOIL AHALYSIS: RISMUTH-212 UHITS: eCi/k8 STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 1 MAY 31~ 1983 720i00 700o00 7 MAY 3is 1983 HD 9 MAY 31~ 1983 21 HAY 31~ 1983 23 MAY 31~ 1983 4-107

Table 4-4.2 SOIL ANALYSIS: BISMVTH-214 t s Ci/kd 'NITS STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 1 MAY 31 ~ 1983 780 i 00 150 i 00 7 MAY 31 ~ 1983. 560o00 150i00 9 . MAY 31~ '1983 580iOQ 150 F 00 21 'AY 31 ~ 1983 450i00 ihOo00 23 MAY 31~ 1983 420.00 170o00 4-108

Table 4-4.3 SOIL ANALYSIS: CES IUH-134 UNITS: aGi/kd STATION CONCENTRATION TWO SIGHA 1 HAY 18~ 1982 <20i00 1 MAY 9r 1983 <60i00 HAY 31 ~ 198'3 <110o00 7 . HAY 18> 1982 <30+00

~ 7 HAY 9~ 1983 <40 F00 7 HAY 31 i 1983 <120o00 9 MAY 18~ 1982 <20i00 9 HAY 9t 1933 <40i00 9 HAY 31'983 <110i00 21 MAY 13 r 1982 <30.00 21 MAY 9t 1983 <40.00 21 MAY 31 r 1983 <130o00 HAY 18~ 1982 <20i00

'13 MAY 9r 1983 <50 F00

. 23 MAY 31 ~ 1983 <150 ~ 00 4-109

TabIe 4-4.g SOIL ANALYSIS'NITS) CES IUM-137 r Ci

/k'ATE STATION CONCENTRATION . TWO SIGMA MAY aor 1978 500 ioo 100roo a HAY ior 1979 <150roo 1 MAY Sr 1980 ib50 ioo 140roo 1 HAY Sr 1981 <150+00 1 MAY 18r 1982 Soooo 30roo 1 HAY 9r 1983 <60+00 HAY 31r 1983 <100.00 2 HAY Sr 1978 <15o,oo MAY ior 1979 550.00 70.00 2 MAY Sr 1980 <150ooo HAY Sr 1981 300 00 F 100roo 3 MAY 8r 1978 700.00 100.00 3 MAY ior 1979 1.4.0 i 00 /oooo 3 HAY 8r 1980 a'120+00 120roo 3 MAY 8r 1981 400roo iooroo 7 MAY 8r 1978 500ioo 70 too 7 MAY ior 1979 <150 ioo 7 MAY Sr 1980 1880'0 140ooo 7 HAY 8r 1981 700ooo iooroo 7 HAY 18r 1982 270+00 40ooo 7, MAY 9r 1983 <40.00 7 MAY 3ir 1983 <110.00...

I 9 HAY Br 1978 140roo 40ooo

.9 MAY ior 1979 <150+00 9 HAY 8r 1980 <150roo 9 MAY 8r 1981 <150roo 9 HAY 18r 1982 340 i 00 " ='.40.00 9 MAY 9r 1983 200+00 aoo i 00 9 HAY 31r 1983 <110.00 21 HAY 18r 1'982 <20 r 00 21 HAY 9r 1983 <40ioo HAY 31r 1983 <100roo MAY 18r 1982 330roo 40ooo MAY 9r 1983 700ioo 200roo 23 MAY 31r 1983 470roo 120roo 4-110

Table 4-4.5 SOIL AHALYSIS: COBALT-58 UH I TS: s-C i/k<

STATION DATE COHCEHTR*T ION TWO SIGMA 1 MAY 10>>'978 <150>00 1 MAY 10>> 1979 <150.00 1 MAY 8>> 1'980 <150.00 1 MAY 8 r 1'981 <150>>00 MAY 8>> 1978 <150>>00 MAY 10>> 1979, <150>>00 MAY 8>> 1980 <150i00 MAY 8>> 1981 <150o00 MAY 8r 1978 <150>>00 MAY 10>> 1979 <150>00 MAY 8>> 1980 <150>>00 MAY 8 r 1981 <150.00 7 MAY 8>> 1978 <150>> 00 7 MAY 10r 1979 <150i00

~ 7 MAY 8>> 1980 <150>>00

.7 MAY Sr 1981 <150'F00 MAY 8>> 1978 <150>>00 MAY 10r 1979 <150.00 MAY 8>> 1980 <150>>00 MAY 81 1981 <150o00 4-.111

4 AV 4 '~ 4 E 0 L:h Al 64@ AIhhC~Q 'd 'j S a WV ~4 ~~P 8 tN I

Tab1e 4-4.6 SOIL ANALYSIS: COBALT-60 UNITS) I Ci/k5 STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 1 MAY. 10 ~ 1978 <aso,oo 1 . MAY aor 1979 <aso i 00 MAY 8~ 1980 <150 00 F

1 HAY 8r 1981 I

<isoioo 2 MAY 8~ 1978 <150 ~ 00 MAY ao~ 1979 <150 ~ 00 2 MAY 8r 1980 <150.00 a MAY 8~ 1981 <150eoo 3 MAY 8~ 1978 <aso.oo

~ 3 HAY lor 1979 <150.00 I

3 MAY 8~ 1980 <150.00 I 3 MAY 8r 1981 <150 00 F

7 MAY '~ 1978 <aso.oo

<asoooo

'I 7 HAY aos 1979.

1 7 . MAY 8~ 1980 <150'00 7 . MAY 8~ 1981 <150 00 9 MAY 8~ 1978 <150.00 9 HAY ior 1979 <150 i 00 9 HAY 8~ 1980 <1 So ioo 9 HAY 8r 1981 <150.00 4- 112

Tab1e 4-4.7 t

SOIL AHALYSIS: IRON-59 UNITS: r-Ci/k<

STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 1 MAY 10 '978 <260 '0 2 MAY 8~ 1978 <260 i 00 3 MAY 8 v 1978 <260 '0 7 MAY 8r 1978 <260+00 9 MAY 8~ 1978 <260i00 4-113

~ ~ ~

t' ~

Table 4-4.8 SOIL ANALYSIS: LEAD-212 UNITS l aCi/k5 STATION CONCENTRATION TWO 8 I GM*

MAY 31 ~ 1983. 340 ~ 00 900 '00 7 MAY 31 ~ 1983 400+00 80i00 9 MAY 31 r 1983 400 00 F 100e00 MAY Zi r 1983 I

160+00 90o00 MAY 31 r 1983 180s00 120e00 4-114

Tab1e 4-4.9 SOIL ANALYSIS: LEAD-214. , .

UNITS l r-Ci/kd.'

STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGNA MAY 31~ 1983 750o00 150 <<00 MAY 31 r 1983 54000 120i00 MAY 31 ~ 1983 750o00 160i00 21 MAY 31 ~ 1983 470o00 140o00 MAY 31~ 1983 780i00 .190i00 4-115

Table 4-4.M SOIL ANALYSIS: HAHGAHESE-54 UNITS: r Ci/k5 STATIOH D*TE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 1 MAY 10r 1978 <150ooo HAY ior 1979 <150+00 1 'MAY 8r 1980 <150ioo HAY 8r 1981 <150+00 MAY Sr 1978 <150.00 HAY ior 1979 <150.00 2 HAY 8r 1980 <150 00 F

2 HAY Sr 1981 <150 r 00 HAY 8r 1978 <15o,oo ior <150.00 HAY MAY HAY 'r 1979 Sr 1980 1981 I

<150.00

<150.00 7 HAY 8 r 1978 <150i00, 7 MAY ior 1979 <150ooo 7 MAY 8r 1980 <150 00 F

7 HAY Sr 1981 <150 00 F

9 MAY 8r 1978 . <150'00 9 HAY ior 1979 <150roo 9 MAY 8 r 1980 <150 i 00 9 HAY 8 r 1981 <150. 00

Tab1e 4-4.11 SOIL AHALYSIS: HIOBIUM-95 UHITS: r-Ci/kS STATIOH COHCEHTRAT I OH TWO SIGMA MAY 10r 1978 <150 i 1 HAY 10r 1979 00'150+00 1 HAY Sr 1980 <150r00 1 MAY 8r 1981 <150+00 2 HAY 8r 1978 <150 i 00 2 MAY 10r 1979 <150.00 2 M*Y Sr 1980 <150i00 2 MAY 8r 1981 <150i00 3 MAY 8r 1978 <150+00 3 HAY 10r 1979 <150o00 3 MAY Sr 1980 <150.00 3 HAY Sr 1981 <150i00

~

7 MAY 8r 1978 <150>00 7 M'AY 10 r 1979 <150.00

. 7 HAY 8r 1980 <150i00 7 HAY 8r 1981 <150+00' 9,

M*Y MAY 8r 1978 10r 1979

<150 '0

<150+00 9 MAY 8r 1980 <150.00 9 HAY Sr 1981 <150i00 4-117

4+ 44 ~ 44,' 4+4'4; >4%', 444:I 4A44444 l," 444 44.4," ',44 a a'4 A +444 4~ 4.~ i 44 Tab1e 4-4.12 BOIL AHALYSIS: POTASSIUM-40 UHITS: . r.Gill:5 STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TMO SIGMA 1 HAY 10r 1978 11000o00 2000i00 1 HAY 8 r 1981 15000+00' 2000e00 1 HAY 9r 1983 10000o00 1000r00 1 HAY 31 r 1983 17000i00 2000.00 2 HAY Sr 1978 13000 F 00 2000o00 2 HAY 8 r 1981 13000o00 1000i00 3 MAY Sr 1978 ~ 10000i00 1000i00 3 MAY Sr 1981 14000i00 100 i 00 7 HAY 8r 1978 11000i00 1000400 7 MAY 8r 1981 13000i00 iDOO.OO" 7 MAY 9r 1983 18000.00 2000.00 7 HAY 31r 1983 i4000i00 4 2000.00 9 HAY Sr 1978 $ 000 F00 1000.00 9

9

'AY HAY 8r 9r 1983

'981 13000+00 16000o00 1000.00 2000i00 9 MAY. 3ir 1983 14000p00 ,~000.00 21 HAY 9r 1983 15000.00 2000i00 2] MAY 31 1983 13000o00 2000.00 MAY 9r 1983 21000.00 2000 i 00 HAY 31 r 1983 17000.00 3000.00 4-118

Table 4-4.13 SOIL ANALYSIS o RADIUM-226 UH ITS ) r-C 1/k<

STATION COHCEHTRATIOH TLJO SIGMA 1 HAY 3ir 1983 760+00 150.00

)

MAY 31 ~ 1983 550+00 130o00 HAY 31~ 1983 670 F00 150o00 HAY 31 ~ 1983 460+00 150e00 23 HAY 31 ~ 1983 600i00 180.00 4-119

I ~r~iiii "iiw k '4 "a'. " 4'1 'i.i4'. ~

W".: rai~l '~4-'~

I TabI e 4-4.14 SOIL ANALYSISl STRONTIUM-90 UNITS l ~Ci/kd STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGMA 1 MAY 18i 1982 43i00 10i00 MAY 18'982 16 F00 5o00 MAY 18~ 1982 <10i00 21 . MAY 18'982 17 ~ 00 8o00 2$ MAY 18~ 1982 28i00 5i00

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

I

]

4-120

Table 4-4.15 SOIL THALLIUM ANALYSIS: "208 UNITS t eC 1/t.d STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 1 MAY 31~ 1983 7 MAY 31 ~ 1983 660+00 190,>00 9 MAY 31 r 1983 800+00 200o00 21 MAY 31 t 1983 500.00 190.00 23 MAY 31 ~ 1983 850m.00 250o00 4-121

Table 0-0.16 SOIL

• H*L'YSI S: ZINC-h5 UNITS i r Cilks ST*TION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 1 MAY 10r 1978 <150o00 1 . MAY 10r 1979 <150r00 1 MAY 8r 1980 <150rO'0 1 MAY Sr 1981 <150o00 2 MAY 8r 1978 <150 F00 2 MAY 10r 1979 <150r00 MAY 8r 1980 <150.00 2 MAY ,8 r 1981 <150r00 3 MAY 8r 1978 <150.00 3 MAY 10 r 1979 <150,00 3 MAY Sr 1980 <150 00 F

3 MAY 8r 1981 <150.00 7 MAY Sr 1978 <150r00 7 MAY 10r 1979 <150.00 7 MAY Sr 1980 <150.00 7 MAY 8r 1981 <150.00 9 M*Y 8r 1978 <150 ~00 9 MAY lOr 1979 <150.00

'9 MAY 8r 1980 <150.00 9 MAY Sr 1981 <150.00 4-122

~ r I

pl l Table 4-4.17 M

l SOIL 4

r AHALYS IS: ZIRCOHIUM-95 UHITS'-Ci/ks STATIOH DATE CONCENTRATION,'WO SIGMA MAY ior 1978 <150 r00 1 MAY 10r 1979 <150 r 00',

t Y

1 MAY, 8r 1980 <150 r00 1 MAY "

Sr 1981 <150 r 00.

2 MAY 8r 1978 <150o00, 2 MAY 10r 1979 <150.00':

2 MAY 8r 1980 '."'150.00 r 2 MAY Sr 1981

<150r00'150.00 3 MAY 8r 197S I 3 MAY 10r 1979 <150.00 3 MAY 8r 1980 <150r00 3 MAY 8r 1981 <150.00 7 MAY Sr 1978 <150r00 7 MAY 10r 1979 <150.00 7 MAY Sr 1980 <150r00 7 MAY 8r 1981 <150o00 9 MAY 8r 1978 <150 r 00 9 MAY 10 r 197'9 <150.00 9, MAY Sr 1980 <150r00 9 MAY Sr 1981 150 00

, ~

TabIe 4-5.0 MILK AHALYSIS: BARIUM-140 UNITS: r Ci/1 STATIOH DATE COHCEHTRAT I OH TWO SIGMA MAR 15 r 1982 <21 ioo MAR 29r 1982 <24.00 APR 26r 1982 HA MAY 10r 1982 <28ioo MAY 24r 1'982 <27roo 9' JUH 7r 1'982 <66.OO JUH 21r 1982 <46+00 9 JUL 6r 1982 <51r00 9 JUL 19r 1982 <110.00'30.00 9 AUG 21 1982 9 AUG ihr 1982 <21+00 9 AUG 30r 1982 <4ii00.

SEP 13r 1982 <13ooo SEP 27r 1982 '<3'5 F 00 9 OCT 18r 1982 <33 i 00 9 HOU 15r 1982 <25o00 9 DEC 20r 1982 <25.00 JAH 19r 1983 <32 i'00 9 FEB 9r 1983 <3iooo 9 MAR 9r 1983 <31.00 9 APR 13r 1983 <40roo 9 APR 27r 1983 <23.00 9 MAY 11r 1983 <16.00 MAY 1ir 1983 <20.00 9 MAY. 25r 1983 <23r00..

9. JUH 71 1983 <30 F 00 .

9 JUH 7 ~ 1983 <20ooo JUH 2ir 1983 <24roo 9 JUL 6r 1983 <190roo 9 JUL 19r 1983 <400ioo 9 AUG ior 1983 <30 F 00 9 AUG 24r 1983 <90.OO 9 SEP 8r 1983 <100roo SEP 2ir 1983 <70ioo 9 OCT 26r 1983 <500 ioo 9 HOU 16r 1983 <30 F 00 9 DEC 20 1983 <30ioo 9 JAH 'or 1984 <30 ioo 35 MAR 15r 1982 <25 00 35 MAR 29r 1982 <18roo 35 APR 26r 1'982 HA 35 MAY ior 1982 <29 i 00 4-124

Tab1e 4-5.0 (continued)

MILK ANALYSISo BARIUM-140 UNITS: F Ci/1 STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGMA 35 MAY 24t 1982 <27tpp 35 JUH 7t 1982 <54tpp .

35 JUH 21t 1982 <59 ipp 35 JUL 6r 1982 <47rpp 35 JUL 19t 1982 SL 35 AUG 1982 <40ipp 35 AUG 16r 1982 <21 00 35 AUG 30r 1982 SL 35 SEP 13t 1982 <13"opp 35 SEP 27t 1932 <30.00 35 OCT 18t 1982 <34 ipp 35 HOU 15r 1982 <25.00 35 DEC 20t 1982 <25 i 00 35 JAH 19r 1933 <32.00 35 FEB 9t 1983 <28.00 35 MAR 9t 1983 <3'irpp 35 APR 13t 1983 <35 F 00 35 APR 27t 1983 <25ipp 35 MAY 11r 1983 <14 r 00 35 35 MAY MAY iir 25t 1983 1983 <30+00

<19rpp 35 JUH 7r 1983 <26tpp 35 JUH . '7 t 1983 <40rpp 35 JUH 21 t" 1983 <35.00 35 JUL 6t 1983 <110.00 34 JUL 19t'983 <500tpp 35 AUG 10t 1983 <30i00 35 AUG 24r 1983 <180opp 35 SEP 8t 1983 <Spipp 35 SEP 21r .1983 <50ipp 35 OCT 26t 1983 <16ipp 35 HOU 16r 1983 <30rpp 35 DEC 20r 1983 <30>00 35 JAH ipr 1984 (20.00 36 MAR 15r 1982 00 36 MAR 29r 1982 <16'0 36 APR 26t 1982 HA 36 MAY 10 1982 <29+00 36 MAY '4r 1982 <26rpp 36 JUN 71 1982 <54tpp 36 JUH 2ir 1982 <50opp 36 JUL 6r 1982 <35.00 4-125.

Tab1e 4-5.0 (continued)

MILK BAR IUM-140 ANALYSIS'NITS:

r-C 1 fI STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 36 JUL '19 >> 1982 '<150o00 36 AUG 2>> 1982 <23i00 36 AUG 16>> 1982 <21r00 36 AUG 30>> 1982 <17 F00 36 SEP 13>> 1982 <13s00

36. SEP 27>> 1982 <29o00 36 OCT 1st 1982 <34~00 36 HOV 15>> 1982 <25>00 36 DEC 20>> 1982 <25 F00 36 JAH 19>> 1983 <32.00 36 9>> 1983 <29r00 36 MAR 9r 1983 <31.00

'36 APR 13>> 1983 <35>>00 36 APR 27r 1983 <20o00

.36 MAY 11>> 1983 <14 F00 36 MAY 11>> 1983 <20o00 36 MAY 25t 1983 <23 i 00 36 JUH 7t 1983- <24 i 00 36 JUH 7>> 1983 <30 ~ 00 36 JUH 21>> 1983 <25i00 36 JUL 6>> 1983 <500i00 36 JUL 19>> 1983 <300.00 36 AUG 10>> 1983 <30r00 36 AUG 24>> 1983 <30r00 36 SEP 8>> 1983 <180.00 36 SEP 22r 1983 <120.00

~

36 OCT 26r 1983 (2000 00 F 36 HOV 16>> 1983 <30+00 36 DEC 20>> 1983 <30o00 36 JAH 10>> 1984 <20 i 00 40 MAR 15>> 1982 <10.00'6.00 40 MAR 29>> 1982 40 APR 26>> 1982 HA 40 MAY 10r 1982 <28 r 00 40 MAY 24>> 1982 <26 00~

40 JUH 71 1982 <64i00 40 JUH 21>> 1'982 <59i00 40 JUL hr 1982 SL 40 JUL 19>> 1982 <130 r00 40 AUG 2>> 1982 <27+00 40 AUG 16>> 1982 <21.00 40 AUG 30>> 1982 <45o00 4-126

4

'4 P 4 4 4 Table 4-5.0 (continued)

MILK AHALYSIS: RARIUM-140 UNITS'Ci/1 BTATIOH DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TMO SIGMA 40 SEP 13~ 1982 <18o00 40 SEP 27~ 1982 <27 i 00 40 OCT 18~ 1982 <33i00 40 HOV 15~ 1982 <25+00 40 DEC, 20t 1982 <25.00 40 JAH 19~ 1983 <32i00 4 ~

40 FEB 9i 1983 <28 F00 40 MAR 9~ 1983 <31i00 40 APR 13~ 1983 <35.00 40 PR '27~. 1983 <18.00

~ 40 MAY 11 r 1983 <17+00 40 MAY 11'0 1983 <20+00 MAY Z5~ 1983 <22 i 00 40 JUH 7~ 1983 <25.00 40 JUH 7~ 1983 <100 00 F

40 JUH 2ir 1983 <40+00.

40 JUL 6~ 1983. <60.00 40 JUL 19 ~ 1983 <300 00 F

40 AUG 50~ 1983 (30i00 40 , .AUG 24r 1983 <140 i 00 40 SEP St 1983 <120 00 F

40 SEP 1983 <50 i 00 (500.00 21'0 OCT 26~ 1983 40 HOV 16~ 1983 (30.00 40 DEC 20t 1983 <30,00 40 JAN 10~ 1984 <20e00 4-127

Tab1e 4-5.1 MILK ANALYSIS: CESIUM-134 UNITS: r Ci/I STATION CON CEHTR*T ION TWO SIGM*

M*R 15 t 1982 <8,OO

~

9 MAR 29r 1982 <Sooo APR 26r 1982 H*

9 MAY 10r 1982 <7 F 00 9 MAY 24r 1982 <4roo 9 JUH 7f f. 982 <4ioo.

9 JUH 21r 1982 <3ioo 9 JUL 6r 1982 <5+00 9 JUL 19! 1982 <3+00 9 AUG 2r 1982 <F 00 9 AUG 16r 1982 <5!00 AUG 30r ~

1982 <9ooo 9 SEP 13r 1982 <3ooo SEP 27r 1982 <2.00 e

9 OCT 18r 1982 <3ooo 9' HOV 15r 1982 <1,O0 DEC 20r 1982 <2ooo JAH 19r 1983 <3r00 9 FEB 1983 <2 ioo 9 MAR 9r 1983 <2+00 9 APR 13r 1983 <4ioo APR 27r 1983 <2ioo 9 MAY 11r 1983 <3 ~ 00 9

9 MAY MAY lir 25r 1983 1983

<4.00

<3ioo 9 JUN 71 1983 <3 F 00 9 JUN 7r 1983 <5 ioo 9 JUH 21r 1983 <2r00 9 JUL 6r 1983 <i,oo 9 JUL 19r 1983 <2ioo 9 AUG ior 1983 <7+00 9 AUG 24r 1983 <ir40 SEP 8r 1983 <1i80 9 SEP 21r 1983 <2roo 9 OCT 26r 1983 <2.00 9 HOV 16r 1983 <5.00 9 DEC 20r 1983 <4roo 9 JAH ior 1984 <9ooo 35 MAR 15r 1982 <10+00 35 MAR 29r 1982 <2eoo 35 APR 26r 1982 HA 35 MAY ior 1982 <4.00.

35 MAY 24r 1982 <4 ioo 4-128

• wl ~

Table 4-5.1 (continued)

MILK AHALYSIS+ CESIUM-134 UNITS: r.Ci/I STATIOH DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 35 JUH 7t 1982 <3t00 35 JUH 21t 1982 <4t00 35 JUL 6t'1982 <5t00 35 JUL 19r 1982 SL 35 AUG ~t 1982 <4 t00 35 AUG 16t 1982 <5t00 35 AUG 30r 1982 SL 35 13t 1982 <3t00 35 SEP 27r 1982 <2o00 35 OCT 18r 1982 <3+00 35 HOV 15r 1982 <it00 35 DEC 20r 1982 <2.00 35 JAH 19t 1983 <3t00 35 FEB 9t 1983 <2.00 35 MAR 9 ~ 1983 <2t00 35 13r 1983 <3t00 35 APR 27 t 1983 <3o00 35 MAY lir lit 1983 1983

<3.00

<5t00 35 MAY 35 MAY 25t 1983 <3t00 35 JUH 7t 1983 <3t00 35 JUH 7t 1983 <8t00 35 JUH 21t 1'983 <3t00 35 JUL 6r 1983 <1+80 35 JUL 19t 1'983 <lt70 35 AUG 10t 1983 <8t00 35 AUG 24r 1983 <2.00 35 SEP St 1983 <li70 35 SEP 21r 1983 <Ot90 35 OCT 26r 1983 <3t00 35 HOV 16t 1983 <5.00 35 DEC 20r 1983 <4t00 35 JAH 10t 1984 <6t00 36 MAR 15t 1982 <5 F00 36 MAR 29t 1982 <4 t00 36 APR 26r 1982 HA 36 MAY lot 1982 <4t00 36 MAY 24r 1982 <14t00 36 JUH 7t 1982 <3t00 36 JUH 21r 1982 <3t00 36 JUL 61 1982 <3t00 36 JUL 19r 1982 <4+00 36 AUG 2t 1982 <2.00 4-129

Tab1e 4-5.1 (continued)

MILK ANALYSIS: CESIUM-134 pCi/1 UNITS'TATION DATE CON CEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA AUG 16t 1982 <5t00 36 AIJG 30t 1982 <4i00 36 SEP 13t 1982 <3 ~ 00 36 SEP 271 1982 <2 F00 36 OCT 1St 1982 <3.i 00 36 Hov'a . 1982 <1 t00 36 DEC 20t 1982 <2i00 36 JAH a9r 1983 <3i00 36 FEB 9t 1983 <2t00 36 MAR 9t 1983 <2t00 13t 1983

'6 APR <3 F00 36 APR 27t 1983 <2.00 36 36 MAY MAY ilt iir 1983 1983

<F 00

<4.00 36 MAY 25t 1983 <F 00 36 JUH 71 1'983 <3t00 36 JUH 7t 1983 "

<7t00 36 JUH 21t 1983 <2i00 36 JUL 6t 1983 <at30 36 JUL 19r 1983 <1+50 36 AUG 10t 1983 <7t00 36 AUG 24t 1983 <5i00 36 SEP St 1983 <F 00 36 SEP 22t 1983 <3+00

., 36 OCT 26t 1983 <6 00 F

36 HOP 16t 1983 <5,00 36 DEC 20t 1983 <3o00 36 JAH 10r 1984 <7t00 40 15 t 1982 <4t00

~

40 29r 1982 <2i00 40 APR 26t 1982 HA 40 MAY 10t 1982 <7.00 40 MAY 24t 1982 <14 F00 40 JUH 7f 1982 <4 F00 40 JUH 21t 1982 <4i00 40 JUL 6r 1982 SL 40 JUL 19t 1982 <3 t00 40 AUG 21 1982 <3o00 40 AUG 16r 1982 <5t00 40 AUG 30r 1982 <10i00 40 SEP 13r 1982 <F 00

~

40 SEP 27r 1982 <2.00 40 OCT 18t 1982 <3t00 4-130

Tab1e 4-5.1 (continued)

MILK ANALYSISi CESIUM-134 UH ITS: r-C i/I STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 40 HOV 15'982 <1 i00 40 DEC 20r 1982 <2ipp 40 JAN 19~ 1983 <3 ipp 40 FEB 9~ 1983 <2ipp 40 MAR 9s 1983 <2opp 40 APR 13> 1983 <3 00 40 APR 27~ 1983 <2 ipp 40 MAY 11~ 1983 <2opp 40 MAY 11~ 1983 <4+00 40 HAY 25~ 1983 <3+00 40 JUH 7~ 1983 <3 F 00 40 JUH 7r 1983 <ii20 40 JUH 21~ 1983 <F 00 40 JUL 6~ 1983 <1.80 40 JUL 19~ 1983 <2.00 40 AUG ipr 1'983 <8.00 40 AUG 24~ 1983 .<2. 00 "40 SEP 8~ 1983 <2.00 40 SEP 21'983 <ii59 40 OCT 26'983 <ii60 40 HOV 16~ 1983 <5 ipp 40 DEC 20~ 1983 <4.00 40 JAN 10~ 1984 <6.00

Table 4-5.2 MILK ANALYSISo . CESIUM-137 UHITSi  ! Ci/I STATIOH DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TblO SIGMA

~ 9 MAR 151 1982 <7 F00 9 ,MAR 291 1982 <5i00 9 261 1982 HA 9 MAY 101 1982 <5 F00 9 MAY 24 1 1982 <4 t00 A JUH 71 1982 <4t00 9 JUH 211 1982 <3.00 9 JUL er 1982 <5 F00 9 JUL 191 1982 <3.00 9 AUG 21 1982 <3t00 9' .AUG ier 1982 <5+00 AUG 30r 1982 <9o00 9 SEP 131 1982 <3i00 9 SEP 271 1982 <2>00 9 OCT 181 1982 <3o00, ~ ~

9 HOV 151 1982 <1.00 9 DEC 201 1982 <2 F 00 9 JAH 101 1983 <3+00 9 1983 <2t00 9 MAR 91 1983 <2i00 APR 131 1983 <4 F00 9 APR 27t 1983 <2i00 9 MAY 111 1983 <3 ~ 00 9 MAY iir 1983 <5o00 9 MAY 25r 1983 <F 00 9 JUH 71 1983 <3o00 9 JUH 71 1983 <6.00 JUH 211 1983 <2.00 9 JUL 61 1983 <it10 9 JUL 1983 <F 00 9 AUG 101 1983 <8i00 9 AUG 241 1983 <it60 SEP 81 1983 <2i00 9 SEP 21r 1983 <2+00 9 OCT 261 1983 <2o00 9 HOV 16r 1983 <7i00 9 DEC 201 1983 <4t00 9 JAH 10r 1984 <10i00 35 MAR 151 1982 <8.00 35 MAR 29t 1982 <3+00 35 APR 261 1982 HA 35 MAY 101 1982 <4i00 35 MAY 1982 <3.00 4-132

Table 4-5.2 (continued)

MILK ANALYSISi CES IUH-137 UHITSo F Ci/l STATIOH DATE CONCENTRATION TblO SIGMA 35 JUH 7t 1982 <3 F00 35 JUH 21t 1982 <4t00 35 JUL 6t 1982 <5r00 35 JUL 19t 1982 SL 35 AUG 2t 1982 <4r00 35 AUG 16t 1982 <5+00 35 AUG 30t 1982 SL 35 SEP 13r 1982 <3r00 35 SEP 27t 1982 <2o00 35 OCT 18.r 1982 <3o00 35 HOV 15t 1982 <it00 35 DEC 20t 1982 <2.00 35 JAH 19t 1983 (3 00 F

35 FEB '9r 1983 (2t00 35 MAR 9t 1983 <F 00 35 APR 13r 1983 (3i00 35 APR 27t 1983 <3r00

~

35.

35 HAY HAY llr lit 1933 1983

<3r00

<5.00 35 HAY 25

't 1983 <3i00 35 JUH 1983 <3 +00 35 JUH 7t 1983 <9+00 35 JUH 2it 1983 <3o00 35 JUL 6r 1983 <ii90 35 JUL 39t 1 983'983

<2r00 35 AUG 10r <8r00 35 AUG 24t 1983 <3 F00 35 SEP 8r 1983 <2i00 35 SEP 21t 1983 1.20 Ot50 35 OCT 26t 1983 (4o00 35 HOV 16t 1983 <6o00 35 , DEC 20t 1983 <5t00 35 JAH 10t 1984 <7t00 36 MAR 15f 1982 <5 ~ 00 36 HAR 29r 1982 <3+ 00 36 APR 26r 1982 HA 36 HAY 10t 1982 <4.00 36 HAY 24r 1982 <12.00 36 JUH 71 1982 <3.00 36 JUH 21 t 1982 <3o00 36 JUL 6t 1982 <3r00 36 JUL 19t 1982 <4t00 36 AUG 2t 1932 <2.00 4-133

Pl.

TabIe 4-5.2 (continued)

ANALYSIS t UNITS'ESIUM-137 sCi/l STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA AUG 16r 1982 <5i 00 36 AUG 30r 1982 <4r00 36 SEP 13r 1982 <3o00 36 SEP 27t 1982 <2+00

36. OCT 18r 1982 <3r00 36 HO<) 15r 1'982 <1+00 DEC 20r 1982 <2i00 JAH 19r 1983 <3.00 36 FEB 9r 1983 <2r00 36 MAR 9r 1983 <2r00 3e . APR 13r 1983 <3<00 36 APR 27r 1983 <2e00 36 36 MAY MAY iir iir 1 98.3 1983

<3>00

<5.00 MAY 25r 1983 <3.00 36 JUH 7r 1983 <3 r.00 36 JUH 7r 1983 <8iOO 36 JUH 2ir 1983 <2.00 36'6 JUL er 1983 <ir40 JUL 1983 <ii 60 36 AUG 10r 1983 <7+00 36 AUG 24r 1983 "

<hi00 3e SEP Br 1983 <4r00 3e SEP 1983 <F 00 36 OCT 26r 1983 <F 00 36 HO<) 16r 1983 <ei00 36 DEC 20r 1983 <3r00 36 JAN 10r 1984 <7r00 40 MAR 15r 1982 <3r00 40 l'1 AR 29r 1982 .

".':2o00 1 F00 40 APR 26r 1982 HA 40 MAY 10r 1982 <5r 00 40 MAY 24r 1982, <12'0 40 JUN 7r 1982 <4 F00 40 JUH 2ir '982

<4r00 40 JUL er 1982 SL 40 JUL 19r 1982'982: <3.00 40 AUG 2r <3 F00 40 AUG 16r 1982 <5.00 40 AUG 30r 1982 <10r00 40 SEP 13r 1 S" 82 ~ <4r00 40 SEP 27r 1982 <2o00 40 OCT 18r 1.982 <3o00

Table 4-5.g (continued)

MILK AH*LYSIS+ CESIUM-137 UHITS l r-Ci/1 STATIOH DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 40 HOU 15r 1982 <1 F00 40 DEC 20r 1982 <2r 00 40 JAH 19r 1983 <3<00 40 FEB 9r 1983 <2+00 40 MAR 9r 1983 <2+00 40 APR 13r 1933 <F 00 40 APR 27r 1983 <2 F00 40 MAY 11r 19S3 <2.00 40, 40 MAY iir 1983 MAY 25r 1983

<5r00

<3 F00 40 JUH 7r, 1983. <3'e 00 40 JUH 7r 1983 <1.30 40 JUH 21r 1983 <3i00 40 JUL 6r 1983 <2 F00 40 JUL 19r 1983 <2r00 40 AUG 10r 1983 <9o00

40. AUG 24r 1983 <2 F00 40 SEP Sr 1983 <3 F00 40 . SEP Zir 1983 <io70 40 OCT 26r 1983 <ie80 40 HOU 16r 1983 <6(00 40 DEC 20r 1983 '<5 o 00 40 JAH 10r 1984 <6.00 4-135

Table 4-5.3 MILK ANALYSIS: IODINE-131 UHITS: t Ci/1 STATION CONCENTRATION TMO SIGMA 9 JAH 19t 1983 <0.60 9 FEB 9t 1983 <Ot50 9 MAR 9t 1983 <ir00 9 APR 13t 1983 <Or50 9, APR 27t 1983 <Or50 9' MAY lir 1983 <0+50 MAY 25t 1983 <lt00

9. JUH 7t 1983 <F 00 9 JUH 21r .1 983 . <0.80 9 JUL 6t 1983 <Ot60

. '9 JUL 19r 1983 <Ot30 9

9 AUG 10t

.AUG 1983 1983

<0 '0

<0.30 SEP 8r 1983 <0.60 9 SEP 211 1983 <0.40 9 OCT 26r 1983 <Ot 12 9 HOV 16r 1983 <Ot09 9 DEC 20r 1983 <0t60 9 JAH '10t 1984 <0'. 30 35 JAH 19r 1983 <Or60 35 FEB 9t 1983 <0 ~

35 MAR 1983 50'1.00 35 APR 13 1983 <0.50 35 APR 27t MAY ilt 1983 1983

<0 '0

<Oo50 35 MAY 25r 1983 <lt00.

(0 '0

~

35 JUH 7t 1983 35 JUH 21t 1983 <Ot70 35 JUL 6t 1983 <Ot50 35 JUL 19r 1983 <Ot50 35 AUG 10r 1983 <Or30 35 AUG 24t 1983 <0.20 35 SEP 8t'1t 1983 <0.30 35 SEP i983 <Ot40 35 'OCT 26t 1983 <0 i 12 35 HO<) 16t 1983 <Ooi3 35 DEC 20r 1983 <Or60 35 JAH 10t 1984 <0.60 4-136

Table 4-5.3 (continued)

HILK ANALYSIS+ IODIHE-131 UHITS: r-C 1 /1 STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGHA 36 JAH 19r 1983 <Ot60 36 FEB 9r 1983 <Ot50 36 MAR 9r 1983 <1+00 36 APR 13r 1983 <Ot50 36 APR 27r 1983 <Ot50 36 MAY iir 25r 1983 1983 <Ot50

<it00 36 HAY 36 JUH 7F 1983 <it00 36 JUH 21r 1983 <Ot89 36 JUL 6 ~ 1983 <Ot60 36 JUL 19r 1983 <Ot18 36 AUG 10r 1983 <0+30 36 AUG 24t 1983 <Ot30 36 SEP 8r 1983 <Ot40 36 SEP 22r 1983 <Ot40 36 OCT 2hr 1983 <0t10 36 HOV 16r 1983 <Ot15 36 DEC 20r 1983 <0.90 36 JAH 10r 1984 . ~

<Oti9 40 19r 1983 <Ot60 40 1983 <Ot50 40 . MAR 9r 1983 <1.00 40 APR 13r 1983 <Ot50 40 APR 27r 1983 <0.50 40 MAY 11 1983 <0.50 40 HAY '5r

.1983 <it00 40 JUH 7 r 1983 <1 F00 40 JUH 21r 1983 <lt00 40 JUL 6r 1983 <Ot50 40 JUL 19r 1983 <Ot13 40 AUG 10r 1983 <0 t30 40 AUG 24r 1983 <Ot20 40 SEP Sr 1983 <Oi70 40 SEP 21r 1983 <Ot30 40 40 OCT HOV 26r 1983 16r 1983

<0 '4

<Oi17 40 DEC 20r 1983 <Ot60 40 JAH 10r 1984 <0+20 4-137

MILK ANALYSIS: LAHTHAHUM-140 UHITS+ r Ci/I STAT!OH DATE CON CEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 9 MAR 15r 1982 <16r00 MAR 29r 1982 <14 F00 APR 26r 1982 HA 9 MAY 10r 1982 <2ir00 9 MAY 24r 1982 <16r00 9 JUH 7t 1982 <28r00 9 JUH 21r 1982 <21..00 9 JUL 6r 1982 <22.00 9 JUL 19r 1982 <48+00 9 AUG Pr 1982 <13.00 9 AUG 16r 1982 <9r00 AUG 30r 1982 <18~00 SEP 13r 1982 (5o00 SEP 27r 1982 <15o00 OCT 18r 1982 <14+00 HOV 15r 1982 <ii F00 DEC 20r 1982 <11 ~ 00 JAN 19r 1983 <14i00 FEB 9 ~ 1983 <igr00 MAR 9r 1983 <13r00 9 APR 13r 1'983 (15.00 9 APR 277 1983 <10.00 9 MAY 11r 1983 <7.00 9 MAY iir 1983 <12.00 9 MAY 25r 1983 <10o00 9 JUH 71 1983 <13i00 9 JUH 7 r 1983 <F 00 9 JUH 21r 1983 (11.00 9 JUL 6r 1983 <90i00 9 JUL 19r 1983 <200.00 9 AUG ior 1983 <13r00 9 AUG 24r 1983 <40.00 9 SEP 8r 1983 <40r00 SEP 21r 1983 <30.00 9 OCT 26r 1983 <~00i00 9 HO<) ihr 1983 <15r00 DEC 20r 1983 <12r00 JAH 10r 1984 <14 r 00 MAR 15r 1982 (19o00 MAR 29r 1982 <13+00 APR 26r 1982 HA MAY 10r 1982 <17.00 4-138

Table 4-5'.4 ~

(continued)

MILK ANALYSIS l LAHTHAHUM-140 UHITS o r-C i/1 STAT IOH DATE COHCEHTRATI OH TWO SIGMA 35 MAY 24) 1982 <ihi 00 35 JUH 7) 1982 <25i00 35 JUH 21) 1982 <25 i 00 35 JUL 6) 1982 '21>00 35 JUL 19) 1982 SL 35 AUG 2) 1982 <17 r 00 35 AUG '6) 1982 <9.00 35 AUG 30r 1982 SL 35 SEP 13t 1982 <hi00 35 SEP 27) 1982 <13)00 35 OCT 18r ,1982 <14.00 35 HOU 15r 1982 <11.00 35 DEC 20) 1982 <11.00 35 JAH 19) 1983 <14)00 35 9) 1983 <12.00 35 MAR 9r 1983 <43+00'15.00 35 APR 13) 1983 35 APR 27 r 1983 <10+09 35 MAY 11) 1983 <6)00 35 35 iir MAY 25) 1983 1983 <11).00

<8o00 35 JUH 7) 1983 <iii00 35 JUH 7) 1983 <14o00 35 JUH 21r 1933 <14)00 35 JUL 6r 1983 <70o00 JUL 19) 1983 . <200o00 AUG 10) 1983 <14)00 ~

35 AUG 24) -1983 <80.00 35 SEP 8) 1983 <40)00 35 21r 1983 <20o00 35 OCT 26r 1983 <7o00 35 HOU ihr 1983 <13+00 35 DEC 20) 1983 <15+00 35 JAH 10r 1984 <11)00 36 MAR 15 t 1982 <13i00 36 MAR 29r 1982 <12i00 36 AP.R 26) 1982 HA 36 MAY 10) 1982 <17)00 36 MAY 24) 1982 <19)00 36 JUN 7) 1982 <24)00, 36 JUH 21) 1982 <23o00 .

36 JUL 6r 1982 <16)00 4-139

Table 4-5.4 (continued)

MILK ANALYSIS: LAHTHAHUM-140 UNITS: t Cil 1 STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA JUL'AUG 19t 15'82 <66+00 36 2 ~ 1'982 <10t00 36 AUG 16t 1982 <9+00 36 AUG 30t 15'82 <7t00 36 SEP 13t 1982 <hi00 36 SEP 27t 1982 <12.00 36 OCT 18t 1982 <14.00 36 HOU 15t 1982 <iii00 36 DEC 20t 1982 <11 00 F

36 JAH 19t 1983 <14.00 36 FEB 9t 15'83 . '12t00 36 MAR 15'83 <13 F 00 36 13 t 1983 <15)00 36 271 l983 <8.00 36 MAY 1983 <hi00 06 36 MA'(

MAY iit 1983 25t 1983

<12t00

<10+00 36 JUN 7t 1983 <10+00 36 JUH 7t 1983 <12.00 36 JUN 21t 1983 <12 i 00 36 36 JUL 6t JUL 19t 15'83 1983 <200 '0

<120 ~ 00 36 AUG 10t 1983 <14.00 3o AUG 24t 15'83 <14 F00 36 SEP 8t 1983 <80.00 36 SEP 1'7 t 1983 <50i00 36 OCT 26t 1983 <1000o00 36 HOU 16) 1983 <'13 t 00 36 DEC 20t 1983 <iit00 36 JAH 10t 15'84 <10t00 40 MAR 15t 1982 <8.00 40 MAR 29t 1982 <5i00 40 APR 26r 1982 HA 40 MAY 10t 1982 .<21+00 40 MAY 24t 1982 <19o00 40 JUH 7t 1982 <28 F 00 40 JUH 21t 1982 <25o00 40 JUL 6t 1982 SL 40 JUL 19r 1982 <57o00 40 AUG 21 1982 <12o00 40 AUG iht 1982 <9o00 40 AUG 30r 15'82 <20~00 4-140

Tab1e 4-5.4 (continued)

MILK AHALYSIS'ANTHANUM-140 UHITS: r Ci/I STATION DATE COHCEHTRATI OH TWO SIGMA 40 SEP 13r 1982 (Si00 40 SEP 27r 1982 <12i00 40 'CT 18r 1982 <14i00 40 HOV 15r 1982 <ii+00 40 DEC 20r 1982 <1 1 F00 40 JAH 19r 1983 <14,00 40 FER 1983 <12i00 40 MAR .9 r 1983 (13.00 40 APR 13r 1983 (14i00 40 APR 27r 1983 <8.00

.40 MAY 11 r 1983 <7i00 40 40 MAY iir MAY 25r 1983 19S3 (i 1 F00

<9.00 40 JUH 7r 1983 <11i00

~

40 JUH 7r 1983 <50o00 40 JUH 21r 1983 <15..00 40 JUL 6r 1083 . <20r00 40 JUL 19r 1983 <140.00 40 AUG 10r 1983 <15+00 40 40 40

'AUG SEP SEP

'r 24r 21r 1983 1983 1983

<60i00

<50r00

<20i00 40 OCT 26r 1983 <180.00 40 HOV 16r .1983 <14.00 40 DEC 20r 1983 <15.00 40 JAH 10r 1984 (12i00 4-141

Table 4-5.5 MILK AHALYSIS1 POTASSIUM-40 UNITS> r-c i/I STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 9 MAY aa~ 1983 1400 ioo 200s00 JUH 7~ 1983 1200ioo 200i00-9 JUL er 1983 1300 F 200ooO 9 JUL 19~ 1983 00'200ioo 200.00 9'9 AUG 10~ 1983 1300ooo 200.00 AUG 24'~ 1983 aaoo+00 200.00 9 ~ SEP 1983 a3oo,oo 200ooo 9 SEP 2ar 1983 1200 F 00 200 ioo OCT 26~ 1983., 1300.00 200ooo 9 HOV aer 1983 1300.00 200.00 DEC 20~ 1983 1300.00 200ooo 9 JAN aors 1984 1400"00. 200.00 35 MAY aa~ 1983 1300ooo 200ioo 35 JUN 7t 1983" 1400ioo 200i00 35 JUL er 1983 1600 ~00 200ooo 35 JUL 19'983 aaooooo 200+ 00 AUG 10 ~ 196'3 1500ioo 200(00 AUG 24'r 1983 1300ioo 200'00 SEP 1983 1400ooo 200.00 35 SEP 2ar 1983 a3oo,oo 200.00 35 OCT 26'e~

1983 1300>00 200.00 35 HOV 1983 1300.00 200 i 00 35 DEC 20~ 1983 -

aaoo,oo 200 i 00 35 JAH 10~ 1984 1400 F 00 200 i 00 36 MAY 1983 1300.00. 200o00 36 JUH 7f 1983 1100 F00 200ioo 36 JUL et 1983 1500'0 200 i 00 36 JUL 19t 1983 aaooioo 200eoo 36 AUG 10r 1983 1200>00 200ooo 36 AUG 24~ 1983 1200ioo 200ooO 36 SEP 8~ 1983 1400ooo 200ooo 36 SEP 22~ 1983 1300 i 00 200>00 36 OCT 26~ 1983 a400ooo 200.00 36 HOV 16~ 1983 1300.00 200.00 36 DEC 20~ 1'983 1300>00 200ooo 36 JAH ao~ 1984 1300 00 F 200ioo 40 MAY aa~ 1983 1400o00 200.00 40 JUH 7s 1983 1600.00 '200.00 40 JUL 6~ 1983 aeooooo 200ioO 40 JUL 1'9 r 1983 aiooioo 200ioO 40 AUG ao~ 1983 130oioo 200ioo 4-142

Table 4-5.5 (continued)

MIlK ANALYSIS." .POTASSIUM-40 UHITS: r-Ci/1 STATIQH CON CEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 40 AUG 24~ 1983 1300 i 00 200o00=-

'40 SEP 8r 1983 1400 ~ 00 200o00

'.'0 SEP 21~ 1983 1300 i 00 200+00

.'c 40 OCT 26~ 1983 1700.00 200'F00 200+00

'040 HOU ibad DEC 1983 20'983 1300o00 1300i00 200o00 200.00 40 JAH 10 r 1'984 1300,00 4-143

Tab1e 4-6.0 FISH ANALYSIS: CESIUM-134 UNITS: t'Ci /k<

STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH OCT ~~ t 1980 <130 t00 30 OCT 22 t 1980 <80too 30 OCT 22t 15'80 <130+00 30 OCT 1 5'80 <130toO 30 APR 26t 1 5'81 <130 ioo 30 APR 26r 1981 <130+00 30 JUN alt 1982 <40.00 30 JUH lir 1982 <40ioo 30 JUN 11r 1982 <30too 30 JUH lir 1982 <40'0 30 HOV 5t 1 5'82 <ao l 00 30 HOV 5r 1982 <10.00 30 HOV St 1982 <10.00 30 HOV 5t 1982 <10 l 00 30 HOV 16t 1983 <17 too 30 NOV 16r 1983 <16too 30 HOV 16t 15'83 <10 ioo APR 21 r 1980 <130too 38 OCT 23 t 1 5'80 <13Q coo 38 APR 21r 1981 <130too 38 OCT 1981 <a3o.oo 28t 1982 <20.00 38 OCT 29t 1982 <10.00 38 JUL 20t l. 983 <19too 38 OCT 24t 1983 <15ioo 39 APR 23t 1980 <130too 3'9 APR 23 t 1980 <a3o..oo 39 APR 23t 1980 <130too 39 APR 23t 1 5'80 <130t00 39 OCT 21r 1981 <130 l 00 35'9 OCT 21t 1981 <130.too OCT 21r 1981 <130too 39 OCT 21t 1981 <130too 39 JUN 27t 1 5'83 <30+00 39 JUH 27r 1983 <30.00 39 JUN 27t 1983 <30too 39 JUH 27t 1983 <40.00 39 HOV 14r 1983 <12 F 00 39 HOV 14t 1983 <aa coo 39 HOV 14r 1983 <6l 00 39 HOV "14t 1983 <7 l 00 4-144

Table 4-6.1 FISH AHALYSISe CESIUM-137 UHITS: r-Ci/kd STATIOH DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 30 APR 26f 1978 <130 i 00 30 APR 26f 1978 <130ioo

~ 30 APR 26f 1978 <130 00 F

30 APR 26f 1978 <130ooo 30 OCT 20f 1978 .'<130ioo 30 OCT 20f 1978 (l30ooo 30 ocr 20f 1978 <130.00 30 OCT 20f 1978 <130ioo 30 *PR 25 f 1979 <13O,OO 30 APR 1979 <130ioo 30 APR 25t 1979 <130ooo 30 30 APR 251 OCT 29f 1979 1979

<130 '0

<130.00 30 OCT 22 f 1980 <130.00 30 OCT 1980 <130 i 00 30 OCT 1980 <130ioo

, 30 OCT 22f 1980 <130.00 30 APR 26f 1981 <130 i 00 30 APR 26f 1981 <130+00 30 30 JUH JUH iif 11f 1982 1982

<30ooo

<40ioo 30 30 JUH JUH ilf iif 1982 1982 (30 i 00

<40ooo 30 HOV 5t 1982 <loioo 30 HOV 51 1982 <10.00 30 HOV 5t 1982 '10.00 30 HOV 5f 1982 <10ooo 30 HOV 16f 1983 50+00 15.00 30 HOV 16f 1983 <20soo 30 HOV 16f 1983 48ioo ioioo I

38 APR '28f 1978 <130 f 00 38 OCT 24r 1978 <130ooo 38 APR 25f 1979 <130opo 38 OCT 30f 1979 <130ipo 38 APR 21f 1980 (130ioo 38 OCT 231 1980 <130.00 38 21f 1981 <130ioo 38 OCT 22f 1981 <130ioo 38 MAY 28f 1982 <20aoo 38 OCT 29f 1982 <loooo 38 JUL 20f 1983 <20ooo 38 OCT 24f 1983 <19ioo 4-145

V .I 1' 'fP V gl VVV ~ <<d'V Vf Vl>>,',O'0, \ -.I 'l . f... e l V%V 1 II>> IVV I 'N S y 44 ~ l'V 4 ~ ~ = 8>>>>VV JL -4>> ~ -4 Table 4-6.1 (continued)

FISH ANALYSIS+ CESIUH-137, UNITS o aCi/t.d STATION DATE CON CEHTRATI OH TMO SIGNA 39 APR 1980 <130o00 39 APR 23~ 1980 <130i00 39 *PR 23~ 1980 <130i00 39 APR 23~ 1980 <130o00 39 OCT 21~ 1981 <130+00

. 39 OCT 21~ 1981 <130i00 39 OCT 21~ 1981 <130i00 39 OCT 21'r 19.81 <130i00 39 JUH 27'983 <30 i 00 39

'OV'3~

JUN 27'983 <40>00 39 JUH 27'983'7'983 <20.00 39 JUN <40 i 00.

39 HOV 14~ 1983 46.00 11.00 39 HOV 14~ 1983 22.00 9 F00

'39 HOV 14~ 1983 ih F00 5.00 39- 14~ 1983 23 F00 5.00 03 4-146

Tab1e 4-6.2 FISH AHALYSIS t COBALT-58 UHITS o vCi/k<

STATIOH CONCENTRATION APR 26t 1978 <130.00 30 APR 26r 1978 <130t00 30 APR 26t 1978 <130t00 30 APR 26t 1978 <130t00 30 OCT 20t 1978 <130t00 30 OCT 20t 1978 <130tDD 30 OCT 20t '978

<130t00 30 OCT 20t 1978 <130t00 30 ~ APR 1979 <130t00 APR 25t 1979 <130i00 30 APR 25t 1979 <130'00 30 APR 25t 1979 '<130e00 30 OCT 29t 1979 <130t00 30 OCT a9so <130.00 30 OCT 22t 1980 ~

<80i00 30 OCT 22t 1980 <130i00 30 OCT 227 1980 <130t00 30 APR 26r 1981 <130t00 30 26t 1981 <130 t00 30 JUH 11t 1982 <20'0 30 30 JUH iit JUH la 1982 1982

<20 t00

<30+00 30 JUH r'lt 1982 <30t00 30 HOU 5t 1982 <20t00 30 HOU St '982

<30t00 30 HOV 5 t 1982 <30t00'20t00 30 HOV 5t 1982 30 HOU 16r 1983 <30t00 30 HOV 1983 <20t00 30 HOV 16t 1983 <14t00 38 APR 28t 1978 <130<00 38 OC.T 24r 1978 <130t00 38 APR 25t 1979 <130.00

'38 OCT 30t 1979 .<130t00 38 APR 21r 1980 <130o00 38 OCT 23t 1980 <130i00 38 APR 21r 1981 <130.00 38 OCT 22t 1981 <130.00 38 MAY 28t 1982 <20t00 38 OCT 29r 1982 <30t00 38 JUL 20t 1983 <40o00 38 OCT 24t 1983 <17t00 4-147

Table 4-6.2 (continued)

FISH ANALYSIS: COBALT-58 UNITS o eC ilkd STAT I OH I<ATE COHCEHTRAT ION 39 APR 23~ 1980 <130 F00 39 APR 23~ 1980 . <130i00 39'PR 23~ 1980 <130+00

'9 39 APR 23~ 1980 OCT 21 ~ 1981

<130i00

<130,00 39 OCT 21 ~ 1981 <130'00 39 OCT 21~ 1981 <130 00 F

39 OCT 21 ~ 1981 <130.00 39 JUH 27'983 <30.00 39 JUH 27'983 <40o00

.39 JUH 27~ 1983 <40 F00 39 JUH 27'983 (50+00 39 "

HOV 14~ 1983 (20.00 39 HOV 14r 1983 (14 00 F

39 HOV 14> 1983 <9.00 39 HOV 14'983 <11'0 4-148

Table 4-6.3 FISH ANALYSIS+ COBALT-60 UNITS: t Ci/t.<

STATION DATE CON CEHTRATIOH TMO SIGHA 30 APR 26r 1978 <130 too 30 APR 25r 1978 <130.00, 30 APR 26t 1978 <130 r 00 30 APR 26r 1978'978 <130.00 30 OCT 20t <130roo 30 OCT 20t 1978 <130ioo 30 OCT 20t 1978 <130too 30 OCT 20r 1978 <130ioo 30 OCT 1980 <a3o,oo 30 OCT 1980 <80+00 30 OCT 22t 1980 <130roo 30 OCT .t'7 r 1980 <130too 30 *PR 6t 1981 <130ooo 30 APR 26r 1981 C130,00 30 JUH 11t 1982 <20.00 30 30 JUH JUH lirt ii 1982 1982

<30ioo

<30t00 30 JUH aar .1982 <30.00

'30 HOV 5t 1982 <ao ioo 30 HOV 51 1982 <ao+00 30 HOU 5~ 1982 <20.00" 30 HOV 5r 1982 <10.00 30 HOV 16t 1983 <30too 30 HOU 16r 1983 <30.00 30 HOV 16r 1983 <14ooo 38 APR 28r 1978 <130too 38 OCT 1978 <130too 38 APR 21r 1980 <130r00 38 OCT 23t 1980 <130ooo 38 APR 21r 1981 <130ioo 38 OCT 22t 1981 <130 00 F

38 MAY 28t 1982 <20.00 38 OCT 29t 1982- ,<iotoo 38 JUL 20t 1983 <20i00.

38 OCT 24 1983 <20ooo

'31 39 APR 1980 <130ooo 39 APR 23r 1980 <130ioo 39 APR 23r 1980 <130ioo 39 APR 23 1980 <130too 39 OCT '1r 1981 <130ioo 39 OCT 21t 1981 <130.00 39 OCT 21r 1981 <130.00 4-149

Table 4-6.3 (continued)

FISH ANALYSIS: CORAL. T-60 UNITS: r.Ci/k5 STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGNA 39 OCT 21~ 1981 <130+00 39 JUH 27~ 1983 <40i00 39 JUH 27~, 1983 <40e00 39 JUH 27~ 1983 <40o00 39 JUH 27~ .1983 <40 F00 39 HOV 14~ 1983 <~0 00 39 NOV 14~ 1983 <16o00 39 HOV 14 r 1983 <9o00 39 HO@ 14~ 1983 <10>00 4-150

I Table 4-6.4 FISH ANALYSIS>> IRON-59 r.Ci/k5 UNITS'TATION I

DATE CON CEHTRAT ION TWO SIGViA R

30 APR 26t 1978 <260.00 30 APR 26r 1978 <260>>00 30 APR 26t 1978 <260.00 30 APR 26r 1978 <260>>00 30 OCT 20t 1978 <260.00 30 OCT 20r 1978 <260>>00 30 OCT 20t 1978 <260>>00 30 OCT 20r 1978 <260>>00 4

30 30 JUH JUH ilt 11r 1982 1982

<60>>00

<70>>00 30 JUH 11t 1982 <60 i 00 30 JUH 1ir 1982 <70 i 00 30 HOV 5t 1982 <50 i 00 30 'OV 51 1982 <70>>00 30 HOV 5t 1982 <70>>00 30 HOV 51 1982 <60>>00 30 HOV 16t 1983 <90>>00 30 HOV 16r 1983 <70.00 30 HOV 16r 1983 <50>>00 38 APR 28r 1978 <260>> 00 38 OCT 24 t,. 1978 <260>>00 38 MAY 28r 1982 <40i00 38 OCT 29t 1982 <40.00,:

38 JUL 20r 1983 <140>>00 38 OCT 24t 1983 <50 F 00 39 JUH 271 1983 <160>>00 39' JUH 27r 1'983 <170>>00 39 JUH 27r 1983 <170+00 39 JUH 27 1983 <200>>00 39 HOV '4r 1983 <70>>00 HOV 14r 1983 <30.00 HOV 14r 1983 <30>>00 HOV 14t 1983 <40.00 4-151

Table 4-6.5 FISH ANALYSIS: MANGANESE-54 UNITS: r Ci/k5 STATION DATE COHCEHTRATION TWO SIGMA 30 APR 26r 1978 <13O,OO 30 APR 2hr 1978 <130+00 30 APR 26r 1978 <130 ioo 30 APR 26r 1978 <130oop 30 OCT 20r 1978 <130ioo 30 OCT 20r 1978 <130ioo 30 OCT 20r 1978 <130ioo 30 OCT 20r 1978 <130ioo 30 APR 25r 1979 . <130 i 00 APR 1979 <f.30ooo 30 APR 25r 1979 ~

<130soo 30 APR 25r 1979 <130.00 30 'OCT 29r 1979 <13O.OO 30 'OCT 22r 1980 '<130opo 30 OCT a,s r 1980 . <80 i op 30 OCT 22r 1980 <130rpo 30 OCT 221 1980 <130.00 30 APR 2hr 1981 <130roo 30 APR 26r 1981 <130.00 30 JUH iir 1982 <30.00 30 JUH 1ir 1982 <40 ioo 30 30 JUH JUH iir iir 1982 1982

<30+00

<40.00 30 HOU 51 1982 <10.00 30 m

.HOV 5r 1982 <ioroo 0 NOU 5r 1982 <20+00 30 HOV 5r 1982 <10.00 30 HOV ihr 1983 <20+00 30 HOV 16r 1983 <20'.oo 30 NOU ihr 1983 <13ioo 38 APR 28r 1978 <130ooo 38 OCT 24r 1978 <130.00 38 APR 25r 1979 <130roo 38 OCT 30r 1979 <130 00 F

38 APR 21r 1980 <130iop 38 OCT 23r 1980 <130.00 38 APR 21 1981 <130 00 F

38 OCT '2r 1981 <130.00 38 MAY 28r 1982 <20.00 38 OCT 29r 1982 <ioroo 38 JUL 20r 1983 <20ipo 38 OCT 24r 1983 <17rpo 4-152

Table 4-6.5 (continued)

FISH AHALYSIS t M*HGAHESE-54 UHITSt r-C 1/kd STATIOH DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGNA 39 APR 23r 1980 <130r00 39 APR 23r 1980 <130o00 39 APR 23r 1980 <130i00 39 APR'3r 1980 <130 00 F

39 OCT 21r 1981 <130i00 39 OCT 21r 1981 <130i00 39 OCT 21r 1981 <130r00 39 OCT 21r 1981 '130i00 39 JUH 27r 1983 <30 F 00 39 JUH 27r 1983 <40 i 00 39 JUH 27r 1983 <40 i'00 39 JVH 27r 1983 <40e00 39 HOV 14r 1983 <1hi00 39 HOV. 14r 1983 <15r00 39 HOV 14 r 1983 <8i00 39 HOV 14r 1983 <8i00 I

~

4-153

Table 4-6.6 F SH ANALYSIS) HIOBIUM-95 UHITS: F Ci/k<

STATION COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 30 APR 26r 1978 <130 00 F

30 APR 26r 1978 <130+00 30 APR 26) 1'978'6r

'130ioo 30 APR 1978 <130eoo 30 OCT 20 r 1978 <130ioo 30 OCT 20 r 1978 <130ioo 30 OCT 20r 1978 <130ioo 30 OCT 1978 '0r

<130roo 30 *PR 25r 1979 <13O,OO 30 APR 25r 1979 <130ioo 30 APR 25) 1979 <130 00 F

30 APR 25r 1979 4130ooo 30 OCT 29r 1979 <130ooo 38 'APR 28 r 1978 < i30+ 00.

3S OCT 2ar 197S <130.00 38 APR 25r 1979 <130ioo 38 ~

OCT 30r 1979 <130ooo 4-154

Table 4-6.7 FISH AHALtYSISo POTASSIUH-40 UH ITS 7 s Ci/l.5 STATIOH DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 30 OCT 20r 1978 3200~00 1100 ~ 00 30 OCT 20r 1978 HR 30 OCT 20r 1978 HR 30 . OCT 20r 1973 HR 30 HOV 16r 1983 3100i00 400o00 30 HOV 16r 1983 3000r00 300.00 30 HOV 16r 1983 3500s00 400o00 38 OCT 24r 1978 4300.00 1200oOQ 38 JUL 20r 1983 3100>00 400 F00 38 OCT 24r 1983 2900o00 400 00 ~

39, - JUH 27r 1983 4200.00 600 F00 39 JUH 27r 1983 2900.00 600<00 39 JUH 27r 1983 3700i00 600 00 F 39 JUH 27r 1983 3300.00 600o00 39 HOV 14r 1983 3300,F00 400i00 39 HOV 14r 1983 3300o00 400o00 39 HOV 14r 1983 2800 F00 300.00 39 HOV 14r. 1983 3000o00 300.00 4-155 t'4I ~ 7 7 '777( 'Pl 7 47 7 ~ 4" ~ tl t ~

+ " h'tl' \4 4'

~ ' I 7t *' tt t+Wtt 7774 l

Table 4-6.8 FISH ANALYSIS: ZINC-65 UNITS: PCi/k5 STATION CON CEHTRATION TWO SIGMA 30 APR 26r 1'978 <260roo 30 APR 26r 1978 <260ioo 30 APR 26r 1978 <260ioo 30 APR 26 1978 <260 00 30 OCT r 1978

'20

<260roo 30 OCT 20r 1978 <260.00 30 OCT 20r 1978 '<260ioo 30 OCT 20r 1978 <260roo 30 APR 25r 1979 <130ooo 30 APR 25r 1979 <130ioo 3.0 APR 25r 1979 <130ioo 30 APR 251 1979 <130.00 30 OCT 29r 1979 <130+00 30 OCT 1980 <130ono 30 OCT 22 r 1980 <Soroo 30 'OCT 1980 <130ioo 30 OCT 22r 1980 <130roo 30 APR 26r 1981 <130ioo 30 APR 26r 1981 <130'F00 30 30 JUH JUH lir iir 1982 1982

<hoodoo

<70ooo 30 JUH iir 1982 <60rno 30 30 JUH HOV iir 51 1982 1982

<70ioo

<2n,OO 30 NOV '5) 1.982 <30r.oo 30 HOV '5r 1982 <20ioo" 30 HOV 1982 <20.00 30 HOV ihr 1983 <60'i 00 30 HOV 16r 1983 <60roo 30 NOV ihr 1983 <40ioo 38 APR 28r 1978 <260ioo 38 OCT 24r 1978 <260ino 38 APR 25r 1979 <130roo 38 OCT 30r 1979 <130.00 38 APR 2ir 1980 <260 00 F

38 OCT 23f 1980 <130ioo 38 APR 21 r 1981 <130roo 38 OCT 22r 1981 <130ino 38 MAY 28r 1982 <40ioo 38 OCT 29r 1982 <20.00 38 JUL 20r 1983 <60ioo 38 OCT 24r 1983 <50 i 00 4-156

Table 4-6.0 (continued)

AHALYSI8: ZIHC-65 UHITS+ r Ci/t:~

STATION DATE CQHCEHTRATIQH TWO SIGNA 39 'APR 23r 1980 <260r00 39 APR 23r 1980 <260r00 39 APR 23r. 1980 <260 00 F

39 APR 23r 1980 <260r00 39 OCT 21r 1981 <130"F00 3'9 OCT 21r 1981 <130o00 39 OCT 21r 1981 <130 r 00 39 OCT 21 r 1981 <130r00 39 JUH 27r 1983 <80.00 39 JUH 27r 1983 <100+00 3'9 JUH 27r 1983 <90i00 39 JUH 27r 1983 <110o00 39 HOV 14r 1983 <50o00 39 HOV 14r 1983 '40.00 39 HQV 14r 1983 <30r00 39 HOV 14r 1983 <20i00 4-157

Table 4-6.9 FISH ANALYSIS: ZIRCONIUM-95 UNITS: pC1/kd STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGNA 30 APR 26r 1978 <130o00

30. APR 26r 1978 <130 F 00 30 APR 26r 1978. <130+00 30 APR 26r 1978 <130i00

'30 OCT 20r 1978 <130 r 00 30 OCT 20r 1978 <130.00 30 OCT 20 1978 <130 F00 30 OCT '0r 1978 <130+00 30 APR 25r

~ 1979 <130.00 30 APR 25r 1979 <130.00 30 APR 25r 1979 <130 00 F

30 APR 25t 1979 '130o00 30 OCT 29r 1979 <130+00 38 'PR 28r 1978 <130e00 38 OCT 24r 1978 <130r00

'38 APR 25r 1979 <130 F00 38 OCT 30r 1979 <130.00 4-158

Tab1e 4-7.0 PRODUCE AHALYSIS: CESIUM-134 UNITS: rCi/kd STATION DATE CON CEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA JUN 20r 1 5'78 <80r00 9 OCT 231 1978 <80i00 9 OCT 23r 1978 <80r00

'9 OCT 23 1 1978 <80r00 9 MAY 19r 1982 <30r00 9 JUN 18r 15'82 <120r00 9 JUN 18r 15'82 <30r00 JUL 22r 15'82 <30r00 9 JUL 22r 15'82 <40.00 9 JUL 22r 1982 <50r00.

9 AUG 24r 15'82 <30i00 9 AUG 24r 1982 <30.00 9 AUG 24r 1982 <30.00 SEP 15r 15'82 <20o00 9 SEP 15r 1982 <60.00 SEP 15r 1 5'82 <40r00 9 MAY 16r 1983 <10s00 9 MAY 16r 1983 (30'0 9 JUN 20r 1 983 ~ <60r00 9 JUN 20r 1983 <30r00 9 JUH 20r 1983 <20r00 9 JUL 26r 1983 <40r00 JUL 26r 1 5'83 <50r00 9 AUG .lg r 1983 <40o00 9 AUG 22 r 1983 <50r00 9 AUG <<<<r 1983 <40r00 9 SEP 26r 1983 <50r00 9 SEP 26r 1983 <50 i 00 5'7 SEP 26r 1 5'83 <50.00 JUH 20r 1978 <30i00 37 JUH 20r 1978 <80 i 00 37 MAY 19r 1982 <30+00 37 JUH 18r 1982 <140r00 37 JUH 18r 1982 <140r00 37 JUL 22r 1 5'82 <30r00 37 JUL 22r 1982 <ia0+00 37 JUL 1982 <40r00 37 AUG 1982 <50r00 37 AUG 24r 1 5'82 <50i00 37 AUG 24r 1982 <40.00 37 SEP 15r 1982 <10'i 00 37 SEP 15 1982 <10r00 37 SEP 15r, 1982 <50 F00 4-159

Table 4-7.0 (continued)

PRODUCE AHALYSISi CESIUM-134 UHITS l r-Ci/kd STATIOH DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TblO SIGMA 37 MAY 16~ 1983 <10 i 00 37 MAY 16t 1983 <40o00 37 JUH 20~ 1983 <70i00 37 JUH 20t 1983 <40o00

~

. 37 JUH 20 1983 . <50o00 37 JUL 26~ 1983 <50i00 37 JUL 26~ 1983 <60i00 37 JUL 26~ 1983 <50i00 37 .AUG 22~ 1983 <40o00 37 . AUG'2~ 1983 <30i00 37 AUG 22~ 1983 <20 F00 37 SEP 26~ 1983 <50.00 37 SEP 26~ 1983 <40.00 37 SEP 26~ 1983 <40i00 4-160.

Table 4-7.1 PaODUCE ANALYSIS: CESIUH-137 UHITS: r-Ci/kd STATIOH DATE COHCEHTRATI OH TWO SIGHA JUH 20r 1978 <80r00 9 JUL 24t 1978 <SOi00 9 JUL 24t 1978 <80 00 F

9 JUL 24r 1978 <80+00 9 AUG 21t 1978 <80+00 9 AUG 21r 1978 <SO<00 9 SEP 25t 1978 <80o00 9 SEP 251 15'78 <30.00 9 SEP 25t 1978 <80r00 9 OCT 23r 1978 <SOr00 '

9 OCT 23t 1978 <80i00 9 OCT 23r 197S <SOo00 NAY .l'7 r 1979 <80.00 JUH 25 t 1979 <80.00 JUH 25t a575 <80.00 JUH 25t 1979 <80o00 JUL 24t 1979 <80 F00 JUL 24t 1979 <80.00 JUL 24t 1979 <80 i 00

'UG 21r 1979 <80r00 AUG 2it 1979 <80o00 9 AUG 2ir 1975'979

<80.00 9 SEP ~

18t <80o00 9 SEP 18r 1979 <80.00 9 SEP as. 1979 <80.00 9 OCT ~~t 15'79 <80'0 OCT 22t a979 <80r00 OCT g .l r 1979 <SOr00 9 MAY St 1980 ,<80 F00 9 MAY Sr 1980 <80r00 9 JUH 23t 15'80 <80 F 00 9 JUH 23t 1980 <80r00 9 JUL 18t 1980 .'<80o00 9 JUL 18t 1980 <80i00 5' JUL 18t 1 5'80 <80r00 AUG 19r 1980 <80r00 AUG a5t 1980 <80i00

'9 AUG 19r 1980 <80 F 00 9 SEP 23r 1980 <80i00 9 SEP 23r 1980 <SOr00 SEP 23t 1 5'80 <80o00 9 JUH 231 1981 <80r00 9 JUH 23r 1981 <80 i 00 9 JUH 231 1981 <80.00 4-161

Table 4-7.1 (continued)

PRODUCE AHALYSISl CES IUM-137 UHITS o r Ci/kd STATION DATE CON CEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA

9. JUL 211 1981 <80 F00 5' JUL 21r 1981 <80i00 JUL 21r 15'81 <80 F 00 9 AUG 18r 1981 <80+00 9 AUG 1st 1981 <80i00 9 AUG isr 1981 <80.00 9 SEP 1981 <80 00 F

9 SEP 22r 1981 <SOr00

.9 SEP 22t 1981 '<80r00 9 MAY 19r 15'82 ~ <30o00 9 JUH 1st 1982 <120o00 9 JUH iSr 1982 <30<00 9 JUL 22t 1982 ~

<30.00 9 JUL 1982 <40.00 9 JUL 22t 1982 <50.00 9 AUG 24r 1982 <30.00 9 AUG 24t 1982 <30o00 9 AUG 24r <30+00 9 SEP 15 t 15'82 <20r00 9 SEP 15r 1982 <60r00 SEP'5t-. 1982 <40i00 9 MAY 16 r 1983 <10r00 9 MAY ihr 1983 <30>00 9 JUH 20t 1983 <70+00 9 JUH 20r 15 83 <30.00 9 JUH 20r 1983 <20i00 9 JUL 26t 1983 <40r00 9 JUL 26r 1983 <60r00 9 AUG 22 t 1 5'83 <50o00 5' AUG 22 r 19S3 <60r00 AUG 1983 <40r00 SEP 26r 1983 <50 F 00 SEP 26t'983 <50o00 9 SEP 26r 1983 <50t00

'37 JUH 20r 1978 <80o00 37 JUH 20r 15'78 <80+00 37 JUL 24t 1978 <80i00 37 JUL 24r 1978 <80i00 37 JUL 24t 1978 <80 00 F

37 AUG 21r 1978 <SOo00 37 AUG 21t 1978 <80>00 37 'UG 21r 1978 <80+00 37 SEP 25t 1978 <80 i 00 4-162

Table 4-7.1 (continued)

PRODUCE AHALYSISt CES IUM-137,.

UHITS o t Ci/t:5 I STATION DATE CON CEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 37 SEP 25t 1978 <80t00 37 SEP t25 t 1978 (80t00 37 OCT 237 1978 <80.00 37 OCT 23t 1978 <80t00 37 OCT 23 t 1978 (80t00 37 MAY 22r 1979 <80t00 37 MAY <<<<t 1979 <130t00 37 MAY 22t 1979 <80t00 37 JUH 25t 1979 <80.00 37 'JUH 25t 1979 <SOt00 37 JUH 25t 1979 <80t00 37 JUL 24t 1979 <80.00 37 JUL 24t 1'97'9 <SOi00 37 JUL 24r 1979 <SOo00 37 AUG 21t 1979 <80t00 37 AUG 2lt 1979 (80t00 37 AUG ~a 1979 <80o00 37 SEP 1st 1979 <80.00 3g SEP 18t 1979 <80t00 37 SEP 1st 1979 <80t00 37 OCT 22 't 1979 . <80t00 37 OCT .7'7 t 1979 <80+00 37 OCT 22t 1979 <80o00 37 MAY st 1980 (80o00 37 MAY 8t 1980 (80o00 37 JUH 23t 1980 <80t00 37 JUH 23t 1980 <80t00 37 JUL 21t 1980 <80i00 37 JUL 21t 1980 <80t00 37 JUL 21t 1980 <80+00 37 AUG 19t 1980 <SO.OO 37 37

'UG 19t AUG 19t 1980 1980

<80o00

<80o00 SEP 23 t. 1980 <80.00 37 SEP 23t 1980 <80 t00 3? SEP 23t 1980 <80i00 37 JUH 23t 1981 <80t00 37 JUH 23t 1981 <80i00 37 JUH 23 1981 <80t00 37 JUL '1t 1981 <80t00 37 JUL 21t 1981 <80t00 37 JUL 21t 1981 <SOt00 37 AUG 1St 1981 <SOo00 37 AUG 1st 1981 <80t00 4-163

Tab1e 4-7.1 (continued)

PRODUCE ANALYSISe CES IUM-137 UHITS1 pCi/kh STATION DATE. COHCEHTR*TION TWO SIGMA 37 AUG 18r 1981 <80r00 37 SEP 021 19S1 <Spipp 37 SEP 22 t 1981 <Spipp 37 SEP 22r 1981 <Sprpp MAY 19r 1982 <30rpp 37 JUH 18r 1982 <140.00 37 JUH 18r 1982 <140 r 00 37 JUL 1982 <30rpp 37 JUL 1982 <100 00 F

37 JUL 1982 <40rpp 37 AUG 24) 1982 <Sprpp 37 AUG 24r 1982 <50 00 37 AUG 24r 1982 <40spp 37 SEP 15t 1902 <10.00 37 SEP 15r 1982 <10~00 37 SEP 15r 1982 <50ipp 37 MAY ihr 1983 <10.00 37 MAY 1hr 1903 <40.00 37 JUN 20r 1983 <Sprpp 37 JUH 20r 1983 . <4'Or 00 37 .JUH 20r 1983 <50.00 37 JUL 25r 1983 <50.00 37 JUL 26r 1983 <60+00 37 JUL 2hr 1903 <50.00 37 AUG 22r 1983 <40rpp 37 AUG 22r 1983 <30.00 37 AUG 2rr 1983 <20rpp 37 SEP 26r 1983 <50rpp 37 SEP 26r 1983 <50rpp 37 SEP 26r 19S3 <40ipp

Table 4-7.2 PRODUCE ANALYSIS+ COBALT-58 UNITS: r-Ci/t.s STATIOH DATE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGMA 9 JUN 20t 1978 <80i00 9 JUL 24r 1978 <80o00 9 JUL 24t 1978 <80 i 00 9 JUL 24r 1978 <SOr00 9 AUG 21 t 1978 <80i00 9 AUG 21r 1978 <80o00 9 SEP 25t 1978 <80o00 9 SEP 25r 1978 <80o00 9 SEP 25t 1978 <80r00 9 OCT 23t 1978 .<80 i 00 9 OCT 23t 1978 <80>00 9 OCT 23r 1978 <SOr00 9 MAY 22t 1979 <80i00 9 JUN 25r 1979 <80.00 9 JUH 25t 1979 <80>00 9 JUH 25t 1979 <SOr00 9 JUL 24t 1979 <80r00

9. JUL 1'979 <80i00 9 JUL 24 1979 <80i00

,9... AUG '1r 1979 <80r00 9 AlJG, 21 r <80.00 AUG 21t 1979 <SOe00 9 SEP 1s t 1979 <80o00 9 SEP isr 1979 <80i00 9 SEP 18t 1979 <80o00 9 OCT 22r 1979 <80r00 OCT 1979 <80o00" 9 OCT 22r 1979 <SOo00 .

9 MAY 8t 1980 <80>00 9 MAY Sr 1980 <80.00 9 JUH 23r 1980 <80.00 9 JUN 23r 1980 <SOi00 9 JUL isr 1980 <80r00 9 JUL 18r 1980 <80i00 JUL 1st 1980 <80i00 AUG 19t 1980 <SOo00 AUG 19t 1980 <80r00 AUG 19t 1980 <80i00 SEP 23t 1980 <80 i 00 SEP 23t 1980 <SOo00 SEP 23t 1980 <80+00 JUH 23 r 1981 <SOi00 JUH 23r 1981 <80o00 JUH 23r 1981 <80.00

Tab1e 4-7.2 (continued)

PRODUCE ANALYSIS: COBALT-58 UNITS o r.C 1/kd STATION DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGH A JUL 21 t 1981 <80+00 9 JUL 21r 1981 ".<80 F 00 5.' JUL 21t 1981 <Soroo AUG 18r 1981 <80+00 9 AUG 18t 15'81 <Soroo 5' AUG 18r 1981 <80+00 SEP 22 t 1981 <Soroo SEP 22r 15'81 <80roo 9 SEP 22t 1981 <80.00 37 JUN 20r 1978 <80.00 37 JUH 20t 1978 <80roo 37 JUL 24r 1978 <Soroo 37 JUL 24t 1978 <80.00 37 JUL 24r 1978 <Soooo AUG 21f 1978 <Soroo.

37 AUG 2if 1978 <SO,OO'Soroo 37 AUG 21t 1978 37 SEP 25f '5'78

<Soroo

. 37 SEP 25f 1978 <Soroo 25f 1978 <Soroo 37 OCT 23t 1 5'78 <80.00 37 OCT 23r i978 <30.00 37 OCT 23r 1978 <80.00 37 HAY 22r 1979 <Sor00 37 HAY 1979 <130o00 37 HAY 22r 1979 <Soroo 37 JUN 25r 1 5'79 <Soroo 37 JUH 25t 1979 <Soroo 37 JUH 25t 1979 <80 i 00 37 JUL 24f 1979 <Soroo 37 JUL 24t 15'75' <Soroo 37 JUL 24r 5'79 <Soroo 37 AUG 2if 1979 <80.00 37 AUG 21r 1979 <Soooo 37 AUG 21t 1 5'79 <So 00 ~

37 SEP 18f 1 97$ <Soroo 37 SEP 18t '979

<Soooo 37 SEP 18r 1979 <80.00 37 OCT 22t 1979 <80 F 00 37 OCT 22r 1979 <80r00 37 OCT 1979 <Sor00 37 HAY Sf 1980 <80.00 37 HAY St 1980 <80.00 4"166

Table 4-7.2 (continued)

PRODUCE ANALYSIS i COBALT-58 UNITS t r.Ci/k" STATIOH DATE COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGNA 37 JUH 23r 1980 <80r00 37 JUH 23r 1980 <80r00 37 JUL 21 r 1980 <<80o00 37 JUL 21 r 1980 <80+00 37 JUL 21 r 1980 <80r00 37 AUG 19r 1980 <80.00 37 AUG 19r 1980 <80r00 37 AUG 19r 1980 <80r00 37 SEP 23r 1980 . <80o00 37 SEP 23r 1980 <80rOO 37 SEP 23r 1980 <80r00 37 JUH 23r 1981 <80o00 37 JUH 23r 1981 <80 F 00 37 JUH 23r 1981 <80o00 37 JUL 21 r 1981 <80o00

'7 JUL 21r 1981 <80.00

<80.00 37 JUL 21r 1981 37 AUG 18r 1981 <80r00 37 AUG 18r 1981 <80o00 37 AUG 18r 1981 <80o00 37 SEP.22r 19sa <80r00 37 SEP 22r 1981 <80r00 37 SEP 22r 1981 <80.00 4-167

\ VV V, V I 0 ~V II VI ffI I&( NV 4ffVV VVVffVIPII 4Vh IV

Table 4-7.3 PRODUCE ANALYSIS: COBALT-60 UHITS: ~ t Ci/k<

STATIOH CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA JUH 20t 1978 <80+00 9 .JUL 24t 1978 <8O,OO JUL 24 t '1978 <80 ioo 9 JUL 24t 1978 <soooo 9 AUG 21t 1'978 <sotoo AUG 21r 1978 <80 too 9 SEP 25t 1978 <soooo SEP 25t 1978 <sotoo 9 SEP 25t 19'78 <Sotoo 9 , OCT 23r 1978 <Soi00 9 OCT 23t 1978 <80.00

'9 OCT 231 1978 <30.00 MAY 2~t 1979 <80 00 F

JUN 1979 <80.00 JUH QC 24t 1979 <80.00 JUH .25 t 1979 <Sotoo JUL 24t 1979 .<80 00 F

JUL 24t 1979 <soooo JUL 24t 1979 <80.00 AUG 21t 1979 <8000 9 AUG 21t 1979 <soooo 9 AUG 21t 1979 <80.00 9 SEP 18t 1979 <80.00 9 SEP 18r 1979 <80.00 9 SEP 18t 1979 <soioo 9 OCT 2~t 1979 %80ioo 9 OCT 22t 1979 <80ioo 9 OCT 22t 1979 <sotoo 9 MAY 8r 1980 <soioo 9 H*Y 8t 1980 <80+00 9 JUN 23t 1980 <80 00 F

9 JUN 231 1'980 <80 F 00 9 JUL 18t 1980 <soioo JUL as. 1980 <80 i 00 9 JUL 18t 1980 <soioo 9 AUG 19t 1980 <80too 9 AUG 19t 1980 <sosoo 9 AUG 19t 1980 <80ooo 9 SEP 23t 1980 <sotoo 9 SEP 23t 1980 <80.00

'9 SEP 23r 1980 <80.00 JUH 23t 1981 <80.00 9 JUH 23t 1981 '<soooo 9 JUH 23r 1981 <Soooo 4-168

Table 4-7.3 (continued)

PRODUCE AHALYSIS'NITS COBALT-60 e r Ci/k5 STATIOH '.: COHCEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 9, JUL 21t 1 981.'981

.80 00 0

9 JUL 21t <Sotoo 9 JUL 2lt 1981.'981

<80too 9 AUG 18t <80too 9 AUG 18-t 1981 <80too 9 AUG 181 1981 <Soooo 9 SEP 22:t .1981 <Sotoo 9 SEP 22t;1981 <80.00 SEP 1981 <80.00 37 JUH 20r 1978 <SO.OO 37 JUH 20t 1978 <Soooo 37 JUL 24r 1978 480i00 37 JUL 1978 <80.00 37 JUL 24r 1978 <30,00 37 AUG 21t 1978 <80too 37 AUG 21r 1978 <Sow"00 37 'UG 21t 1978 <80too 37 SEP 25r 1973 <80too 37 SEP 25t 1978 <80t00 37 SEP 25r 1978 <30too 37 OCT 23t 1978 <8otoo 37 OCT 23r 1973 <80+00 37 OCT 23t 1978 <80too 37 MAY 22r 1979 <Sotoo 7 MAY 22 1979 <13O,OO MAY '2r 1979 <Sotoo 37 JUH 25 1979 <80.00 37 JUH '5r 1979 <80.+00 37 JUH 25t 1979 <80+00 37 JUL 24t '1979 <So.oo 37 JUL 24t 1979 <Sotoo 37 JUL 24r 1979 <80+00 AUG 21t 1979 <80too 37 AUG 21r 1979 <Sotoo 37 AUG 21t 1979 <Sotoo 37 SEP 18r 1979 <Sotoo SEP 18t 1979 <Sotoo SEP 18t 1979 <Sotoo 37 OCT 22t 1 979 <80.00 37 OCT 22t 1979 <Sotoo 37 OCT 22 t 197'9 <80too 37 MAY Sg 1980 <30 00 F

37 MAY St 1980 <80.00 4-169

ya ~ 1 ~ r J l 4 w t' 'r 1I ~

Tab1e 4-7.3 (continued)

PRODUCE ANALYSISt COBALT-60 UNITS'Ci/kd S TAT I.ON DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGHA 37 JUH 23r 1980 <80o00 37 JUN 23r 1980 <80+00 37 JUL 21 r 1980 <80.00 37 JUL 21 r 1980 <80i00 37 JUL 21r 1980 <80'F00 37 AUG 1980 <80o00 37 AUG 19r 1980 <80.00 37 AUG 19r 1980 <80.00 37 ,SEP 23 r 1980 <80>00 37.'7 ,SEP 23r 1980 <80>00 SEP 23r 1980 <80 i 0.0 37 JUN 23r 1'981 . <30.00 I 37 JUH 23r 1981 <80.00 ~

.37 JUH 23r 1981 <80.00 37 JUL 21r 1981 <80 F00 37 JUL'21r 1981 <80r00 37 JUL 21r 1981 <80>00 37 AUG 18r 1981 <80.00 37 AUG 18r 1981 <80o00 37 AUG 18r 1981 <80i00 37 SEP 22r 1981 <80.00 37 SEP 22r 1981 <80.00 37 SEP 22r 1981 <80.00

~

-3 4-170

Table 4-7.4 PRODUCE ANALYSIS l IODINE-131 UNITS) eC i/V.<

STATION CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 9 MAY 19t 1982 <40too 9 JUH 18r 1982 <890tpo 9 JUH as. 1982 <190too 9 JUL 22t 1982 <sotpo 9 JUL 22r 1982 <a2o,oo 9 JUL 22r 1982 <130too 9 AUG 24t 1'982 <60.00 9 AUG 1982 <60too 9 AUG 24r 1'982 <60roo 9 SEP ab t 1982 <30too 9 SEF 15t 1982 <90oop 9 SEP 'i5r 1982 <40,00 9 MAY aer 1983 <20.00 9 MAY 16r 1983 <30.00

.9 JUN 20r 1983 <17too 9 JUH 20r 1983 <eotoo 9 JUH 20r 1983 <50too 9 JUL 26r 1983 <30<00 JUL 26r 1983 <50roo 9 AUG 22t 1983 <eoipo 9 AUG 22t 1983 <50too 9 AUG 1983 <50too 9 SEP 26r 1983 <compo 9 SEP 26r 1983 <60ipp SEP 261 1983 <50too 37 HAY 19t 1982 <aoo i 00 37 JUH 1st 1982 <1000tpo 37 JUH 1s t 1982 <370too 37 JUL 22t 1982 <sotoo 37 JUL 22t 1982 <290.00 37 JUL 22t 1982 <100 00 F

37 AUG 24r 1982 <90too 37 AUG 24t 1982 <80too 37 AUG 24r 1982 <70top 37 SEP 15t 1982 <aotoo 37 SEP 15 1982 <iptpo 37 SEP 15t 1982 <soroo 37 MAY ier 1983 <20.00 37 MAY aer 1983 <40.00 37 JUN 20r 1983 <iiorpp 37 JUN 20r 1983 <50tpo 37 JUH 20r 1983 <60+00 =

37 JUL 26t 1983 <eotop 4-171

~;>>>>r ~ "; ~ I' >> ~-, >>, >>.>>; y p- ~Wig Wgl Cq ~W~>>>>>>>>>>k>>>>m,>>>>>>o,e ~~

Table 4-7.4 (coni:inued)

PRODUCE ANALYSES: IODINE-131 UNITS: r Ci/k5 STATION DATE COHCENTRATIOH TWO SIGNA

. 37 'UL 26~ 1983 <60i00 37 JUL 26~ 1983 <50i00 37 AUG 22~ 1983 <40o00 37 AUG 22~ 1983 <30 i 00 37 AUG 22~ 1983 <60 i 00 37 SEP 25~ 1983 <50'0 37 SEP 26~ 1983 <50o00 37 SEP 26~"1983 I

<50i00 4-172

Table 4-7.5 PRODUCE ANALYSIS: MANGANESE-54 UNITS ) s Ci/k5 STATIOH DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA 9 JUN 20r 1978 <Sotoo JUL 24t 1978 <Sot00 9 JUL 24r 1978 <80too 9 JUL 24r 1978 <Sotoo 9 AUG 21r 1 5'78 <80too AUG 21r 1978 <80too:.-

9 SEP 25r 15'78 <Sotoo 9 SEP 25t 1978 <80+00 5' SEP 25r 1978 <80too OCT 23r 1978 <80.00.

9 OCT 23r,1978 <Sotoo

.9 OCT 23r 1978 <Soooo MAY 22 r 15'79 . <Soroo 9 JUN 25 r 15'79 <Soo00 5' JUH 25r 1 975'975' <Soo00 JUH 25r <80too 5' JUL 24r 5'79 <Sotoo 9 JUL 24r 1979 <80roo 9 JUL 24r 1979 <80too 5' AUG 21t 1979 <Soioo AUG 21r 15'79 <Soi00 AU,G 21r 1979 <so, o'o 9 SEP 1st 1979 <Soioo 5' SEP 1st 1979 <80roo SEP 1st 1 5'79 <sotoo 9 OCT 22r 1975'979

<SOo00 9 OCT 22r <sotoo 9 OCT f 1979 <80too 9 MAY 8> 1980 <80 i 00 MAY Sr 1980 <Soa00 5 JUH 23 t 1980 <80'"ioo JUH 23t 1980 <Soioo JUL 18r 15'80 -:<Soioo JUL 18r 1980 <Sotoo 9 JUL 18r 15'80 <80>00 9 AUG 19r 1980 (Soo00 9 AUG 15'r 1 9.80 <Sotoo 9 AUG 19r 1980 <80+00 9 SEP 23r 15'80 '! <Sotoo 9 SEP 23r 1980 <so,oo 9 SEP 23r 1980

<80.00 9 JUN 23r 1981 <sot00 9 JUH 23t 1981 <So<00 9 JUH 23r 1981 (80 i 00 4-173

~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 1 ~ i rt pP 9, )~if,*'>>,~ i tW Pt 45> ~P ~ c~wvwr1YI

Tab1e 4-7.5 (continued)

PRODUCE ANALYSISi MANGANESE-54 UNITS: t Ci/k5 STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGNA JUL 21< 1981 <80 i 00

.9 JUL 21r 1981 <Sotoo 9 JUL 21t 1981 <80+00 9 AUG 18r 1981 <Soroo 9 AUG 18t 1981 <Sotoo 9 AUG 18r 1981 <So ~ 00 9 SEP <<<<t 1981 <Soroo 9 SEP 22t 1981 <80.00 9 SEP 22't 1981 <Soooo 37 JUH 20r 1978 <Soooo 37 JUH 20t 1978 <80.00.

37 JUL 1978 <SO ~ 00 37 JUL 24t '1978 <80.00 37 JUl 24t 1978 <80.00 37 AUG 21t 1978 <Sotoo 37 AUG 21r 1978 <80+00 37 AUG 21t 1978 <Soroo 37 SEP 25r 1978 <Soioo 37 SEP 25t 1978 <80.00 37 SEP 25'r =1978 <80~00 37 OCT 23 t 1978 <Soroo 37 OCT 23r 1978 <80.00 37 OCT 23t 1978 <Soioo 37 NAY 22r 1979 <30ioo 37 NAY 22t 1979 <130.00'80roo 37 NAY <<<<t 1979 37'7 JUH 25r 1979 <Soroo JUH 25r 1979 <80too 37 JUH 25t 1979 <Sotoo 37 JUL 24r 1979 <SO,OO 37 JUL 24t 1979 <80roo 37 JUl 24r 1979 <80+00 37 AUG 21t 1979 <80 i 00 37 AUG 2lt 1979 <80.00 37 AUG 21t 1979 <80 ioo 37 SEP 18r 1979 <Soroo 37 SEP 18r 1979 <Sotoo 37 SEP 18r 1979 <Soroo 37 OCT <<<<t 1979 <80.00 37 OCT 22r 1979 <80.00 37 OCT 1'979 <80.00 37 NAY Sr 1980 <80.00 37 NAY St 1980 <80~00 4-174

Table 4-7.5 (cpntinued)

PRODUCE ANALYSIS: MANGANESE-54 UNITS o r-Ci/k<

STATION DATE CON GENT RATION TWO SIGMA 37 JUH 23r 1980 <80i00 37 JUN 23 r 1980 <80i00 37 JUL 21r 1980 <80i00 37 JUL 21r 1980 <SOi00 37 JUL 21r 1980 <80o00 37 AUG 19r 1980 <SO.OO 37 AUG 19r 1980 <80o00 37 AUG 19r 1980 <80>00 37 SEP 23r 1980 <80 00 F

37 SEP 23r 19SO <80i00 37 SEP 23r 1980 <80o00 37 JUL 21r 1981 <SO>00 37 JUL 21r 1981 <80o00 37 ,JUL 2ir 1981 <80.00 37 AUG 18r 1981 <80.00 37 JUG 18r 1981 <SOi00 37 AUG 18r 1981 <80>00 37 SEP 22r 1981 <SOi00 37 SEP 22r 1981 <80.00 37 SEP 22r 1981 <80.00 4-'1 75

~ ~ l

• Table 4-7.6 PROOUCE AHALYSISo HIOB IUH-95 UNITS: r-C 1/1:~

STATION COHCEHTRATIOH TMO SIGNA 9 JUH 20t 1978 <80too 9 JUL 24r 1978 <80+00 9 JUL 24t 1978 <80.00 9 JUL 24r 1978 <80too

'9 AUG 21t 1978 <Sotoo 9 AUG 21t 1978 (sotoo 9 SEP 25t 1978 <SO.OO 9 SEP 25t 1978 <80+00 9 SEP 25t 1978 <80.00 9 OCT 23r 1978 <80 F 00 9 OCT 231 1978 <80 00 F

. '9 OCT 231 1978 <80.00 9 MAY 2>t 1979 <80.00 JUH 1979 <80.00 JUH 25 t 1979 (Soioo 9 JUH 25 t 1 979979

<80+00 9 JUL 24t <80 i 00 9 JUL 24r 1979 <Soooo 9 JUL 24t 1979. <Sotoo AUG 21t 1979 <80too AUG 21t 1979 <Sotoo AUG 21t 1979 <Soioo SEP 1St 1979 <80+00 SEP 1st 1979 <so,no 9 SEP 1st 1979 <80 i 00 9 OCT 1979 . <80+00 OCT 22t 1979 <80->00 OCT 22r 1979 <Soioo NAY St 1980 <80too Sr 1980 <80too 9 JUH 23 ~ 1980 <80too 9 JUH 23t 1980 <Sotoo 9 JUL 1st 1980 <Solon 9 JUL 1st 1980 <80.00 9 JUL 18t 1980 <sotoo 9 AUG 19t 1'980 (Soooo AUG 19r 1980 <Sotoo 9 AUG 19t 19SO <80 i 00 9 SEP 23t 1980 <Sotoo 9 SEP 23r 1980 <Sotoo 9 SEP 231 1980 <Sotoo 9 JUH 231 19S1 '<Solon 9 JUH 23t 1981 <solon 9 JUH 23r 1981 <80i00 4-17h

Table 4-7.6 (continued)

PRODUCE ANALYSIS+ HIOR IUM-95 UNITS+ r-C i /l.d STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGMA JUL 21t 1981 <80ioo 9 .JUL 21r 1981 (30+00 9 JUL 21t 1981 <80.00 9 AUG 18r 1981 <80ioo 9 AUG 18t 1981 <80ioo 9 AUG 18t 1981 <30ioo 9 SEP ~~t't '7 1981 <80ioo 9 SEP 22r 1981 <Soioo 9 SEP 1981 (80.00 37 JUH 20r 1978 <80 "i 00 37 JUH 20t 1978 (80 ioo 37 JUL 24r 1978 <80t00 37 JUL 24t 1978 <80o'00 37 JUL 24r 1978 <80+00 37 AUG 2ar 1978 <80ioo 37 AUG 21r 1978 <80too 3? AUG 21t 1978 <80 i 00

.37 SEP 25t 1978 <80ioo 37 SEP 25r 1978 <80roo 37 SEP 25r 1978 <80+00 37 OCT 23 1978 <Soooo 37 OCT t'3r 1978 <so.no 37 OCT 23 t 1978 <80.00 37 MAY 1979 <80+00 37 MAY 22t 1979 <130.00 37 MAY 1979 <80+00 37 JUH 25 t 1979 <80ioo 37 .JUN 25t 1979 <80 ioo 37 JUH 25t 1979 <80ooo 37 JUL 24r 1979 <Soi00 37 JUL 24t 1979 <80+00 37 JUl 24r 1979 <Soo00 37 AUG 21t 1979 <80roo 37 AUG 21r 1979 <80ooo 21t (Soroo

'7 37 AUG SEP 18r 1979 1979 <80+'00 37 SEP 18r 1979 <80ioo 37 SEP 18r 1979 <Soioo 37 OCT 22t 1979 <80+00 37 OCT 22r 1979 <80+00 37 'OCT 22t 1979 <80roo 37 MAY 8r 1980 <80.00 37 MAY 8t 1980 <80.00 4-177

Table 4-7.6 (continued)

PRODUCE ANALYSIS t H I OB IUH-95 UNITS> eCi/I.+

STATION DATE COHCEHTRAT ION TWO SIGHA 37 JUH 23'980 <soo00 37 JUH 23'980 <80+00 37 JUL 21~ 1980 <80i00 37 JUL 21>> 1980 <80 i 00 37 JUL 21 ~ 1980 <80+00 37 AUG 19~ 1930 <80 i 00 37 AUG 19~ 1980 ~

<80 ~ 00 37 AUG 19 r 198'0 <80.00 37 SEP 23r 1980 <80i00 37 SEP 23r 1980 <80 ~00 37 SEP 23~ 1980 <80 i.oo 37 JUH 23~ 1981 <so, o' 37 JUH 23 1981

~ <80'i 00 37 JUH 23~ 1981 ~F80 o 00 37 JUL 21~ 1981 <80 F 00 37 JUL 21 t 1981 <soioo 37 JUI 21 ~ 1981 <80o00 37 AUG 18 ~ 19S1 <80.00 37 AUG 18 '981 <80+00 37 AUG 18~ 1981 <Soooo 37 SEP 22~ 1981 <80+00 37 SEP 22'981 <80 i 00 37 SEP 22 ~ 1981 <80 F00 4-178

Tab1e 4-7.7 PRODUCE ANALYSIS: POTASSIUM-40 UNITS o F Ci/t:5 STATION DATE COHCENTRATIOH TWO SIGNA SEP 25t 1978 NR 9 SEP 25t 1978 3000ioo ioooioo 9 SEP 25t 1978 HR 9 OCT 23r 1978 4700eoo 500ioo 9 OCT 23t 1978 5400ioo 1100i00 OCT 231 1978 3000ioo 900.00 hoodoo 9 JUN 20r 1983 2400roo 500ioo'00ioo 9 JUH 20r 1983 3700ioo 9 JUH 20r 1983 2300 too 300ioo JUL 2hr 1983 <1300+00 9 JUL 26r 1983 1800coo 9 AUG'UG

) 1983 hoooioo 600too 9 1983 4700.00 800.00 9 AUG 22f 1983 2100-.00 500)00 9 SEP 26r 1983 1900ioo 600.00 9 SEP 26r 1983 4600roo 900ioo 9 26r 1983 980ooo 360.00 37 37 JUH 20r JUH 20

'978 1978 5600 ioo 3900ioo 600.00 400>00 37 JUL 24r 1978 HR 37 JUL 24r 1978 HR 37 JUL 24r 1978 5000 i 00 1800ioo 37 *UG 2ir 1978 3900.00 800eoo 37 AUG 21r 1978 NR' 37 AUG 2it 1978 HR 37 SEP 25r 197S 3900 00

~ Soo ioo 37 SEP 25 t 1978 HR 37 SEP 25t 1978 HR 37 OCT 23t 1978 10000ioo 3000ioo 37 OCT 23 t 197S 5000roo liooroo 37 OCT 23 t 1978 3500roo ioooioo 37 JUN 20r 1983 6400i00 ~

700.00 37 JUH 20t 1983 ihoo,oo 400.00, 37 JUH 20t 1983 3500 i 00 700iOO 37 JUL 26r 1983 2700 r 00 500ooo 37 JUL 26r 1983 <2000ooo 37 JUL 26r 1983 3100r00 700roo 37 AUG 22r 1983 4700 00 F hooroo 37 AUG 22r 1983 4500ioo 500 i 00 37 AUG 22r 1983 680+00 140 i 00 37 SEP 26r 1983 1500 i 00 500.00 37 SEP 26r 1983 1900'0 500ooo 37 SEP 26t 1983 980.00 350+00 4-179

4ta < w ~ ww4 ~ oar< wc>

h Tab1e PRODUCE ANALYSIS: ZINC-h5 UNITS: s Ci/kd STATION DATE CONCENTRATION T4IO SIGilA 9 JUH 20t 1978 <80r00 9 JUL 24r 1978 <80+00, JUL 24t 1978 <80r00 JUL 24r 1978 <80+00 h

AUG 21t 1978 <80 F00 9 AUG 21r 1978 <80r00 n~ 1978 SEP 24'r <80o00 9 SEP 25 r 1'978 <80o00 SEP 25t 1978 <80r00 9 OCT 23t 1978 <80+00 9 OCT 23 t 1978 <80 00 OCT 23 t 1978 <80o00 NAY lQ t 1979 <80.00 JUH nr 2&t 1979 ,<80i00 9 JUH 25t 1979

~ <80o00 9 JUH 25t 1979 <80 F 00 9 JUL 24t 1979 <80r00 9 JUL 24t 1979 <80o00 9 JUL 24t 1979 <80 i 00 AUG 21r 1979 <80 i 00 AUG 21t 1979 <80i00 AUG 2ir 1979 <80o00 SEP 18t 1979 <80.00 SEP 18t 1979 <80r00 9 SEP 18t 1979 <80.00 9 OCT 1979 <80.00 OCT 22t 1979 <80+00 OCT 221 1979 <80r00 HAY 8t 1980 <80r00 9 II,AY 8t 1980 <80r00.

9 JUN 23t 1980 <80r00 9 JUH 23r 1980 <80.00 9 I JUL 18t 1980 <80.00 9: ~

JUL 18t 1980 <80r00 JUL 18t 1980 <80r00

'9 AUG 19t 1980 <80.00

.".9 AUG 19r 1980 <80o00 r

AUG 19r 1980 <80r00 SEP 23t 1980 <80r00 SEP 23 t 1980 <80s00 SEP 23t 1980 <80~00 JUN 23t 1981 <30>00 JUH 23t 1981 <80.00 JUN ~4t~

7 1981 <80.00 4-180

Tab1e 4-7.3 (continued)

PRODUCE ANALYSIS: ZINC-65 UNITS i pCi/k" STATION n*TE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGHA 9 JUL 21t 1981 <80r00 9 JUL 21t 1981 <30r00 9 JUL 21 t 15'81 <80r00 9 AUG 13r 1981 <30i'00 9 AUG 18t 1981 <80o00 9 AUG 13r 15'81 <80r00 9 SEP 22t 1981 <80o00 9 SEP 22r 1981 <80r00 9 SEP 22r 15'81 <80.00 37 JUH 20t 1978 <80r00 37 JUH 201 1978 <80.00 37 JUL 24r 1973 <30.00 37 JUL 24t 1978 <80.00 37 JUL 24t 1978 <30<00 37 AUG 21 t 1978 <80r00 37 AUG 21t 1978 <80r00 37 AUG 21t 1'978 <80r00 37 OCT 23t 1978 <30o00 37 OCT 23t 1978 <80r00 37 OCT 23t 1973 <80r00

37. HAY 22t a579 <80.00 37 HAY 1979 <130.00 37 HAY 22 t 1979 <80r00 37 JUH 1975'979

<80.00 37 JUH 25 t <80r00 37 JUN 25t 1979 <80i00 37 JUL 2'4 t 1 979'979 <80.00 37 JUL 24r <80r00 37 JUL 1979 <80r00 37 AUG 21t 1979 <80+00 37 AUG 21t 1 5'79 <80r00 37 AUG 21t 1'979 <30r00 37 SEP 18t 1 5'79 <80r00 37 SEP 18t a975 <80r00 37 SEP 18t 1 5'79 <80 F00 37 OCT 22t 1'979 <80r00 37 OCT 22t 15'79 <80r00 37 OCT 22r 1979 <80r00 37 HAY 8t 15'80 <80r00 37 HAY 8r 1980 <30r00 37 JUH 23t 1 5'80 <80r00 37 JUH 23t 1930 <30.00 37 JUL 21t 1 5'80 <80o00 4-181

1 I

TabIe 4-7.8 (continued)

PaODUCE ANALYSIS:

UNITS'INC-65 r Ci/kd STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TWO SIGNA 37 JUL 21) 1980 <80)00 37 JUL 21r 1980 <80i00 37 AUG 19) 1980 <80)00 37 AUG 19r 1980 <80)00 37 AUG 19r 1980 <80o00 37 SEP 23) 1980 <80)00 37 SEP 23) 1980 <80.00 37 SEP 23) 1980 <80.00 37 .JUH 23) 1981 <80)00 37 JUH 231 1981 <80)00 37 JUH 23) 1981 <80)00 37 JUL 21) 198'1 <80o00 37 JUL 21) 1981 <80o00 37 JUL 21r 1981 <80o00 37 AUG 18) 1981 <80.00 .

37 AUG 18) 1981 <80i00 37 AUG 18) 1981 <80)00 37 SEP 22) 1981 <80.00 37 SEP 221 1981 <80)00 37 SEP 22) 1981 <80.00 4-182

Tab1e 4-7.9 PRODUCE ANALYSIS: ZIRCOHIUH-95 UHITSo F Ci/k5 STATION DATE CON CEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 20r 1978 <soooo 9 JUL 24r 1978 <SO.OO JUL 24r 1978 <80+00 JUL P4r 197S '<30 i 00 AUG 21t 1978 <80.00 AUG 21t 1978 <Soioo SEP 251 1978 <soooo SEP 25t 1978 <Soroo SEP 25t 1978 <soooo OCT 23t 1'978 <Soioo 9 OCT 23 t 1978 <Soioo 9 OCT 23r 1978 <Soooo MAY 1979 <SO.OO JUH 25t 1979 <So<00 JUH 25r 1979 <soroo JUH 25t 1979 <SOioo JUL 24t 1979 <80roo 9 JUL 24t 1979 <80too JUL 24t 1979 <80+00 9 AUG 21r 1979 <Soioo 9 AUG 21r 1979 <soooo

~

9 AUG 21t 1979 <Soioo 9 SEP 18r 1979 <Soioo 9' SEP 1Sr 1979 <80 i 00 SEP 18r 1979 <Soooo 9UH 9

9 OCT OCT 22t 1979 1979

<Soioo

<80 ioo 9 OCT 22 t 1979 <Soioo 9 MAY 'St 1980 <Soooo 9 MAY Sr 1980 <80+00 9 JUH 23t 1980 <soooo 9 JUH 23t 1980 <So>00 9, JUL 18r 1980 <Soooo 9 JUL 1st 1980 <80 i 00 9 JUL asr 1980 <soioo 9 AUG 19r 1980 <80 i 00 9 AUG 19t 1980 <80.00 9 AUG 19r 1980 <Soioo SEP 23t 1980 <80roo 9 SEP 23r 1980 <Soioo 9 SEP 23t 1980 <soooo 9 JUH 23t 1981 <80.00 JUH 23r a9'sa <soooo JUH 23r 1981 <80.00 4-.183 g ~ "Ij,VLF /IVV'I

Table 4-7.9 (continued)

PRODUCE AHALYSISo ZIRCOHIUM-95 UNITS i r Ci/k<

STATION DATE CON CEHTRATIOH TWO SIGMA 9 JUL 21r 1981. <80 ioo 9 JUL 21r l.981 <Soioo JUL 21r 1981 <80 00 AUG 13r 1981 <30+00 AUG 18r 1981 <80+00 9 AUG 18r 1981 <80+00 SEP 22r 1981 <80roo SEP 22r 1981 <30+00 SEP 22r 1981 <80.00 37 JUH 20r 1978 <SO.OO 37 JUH 20r 1978 <80'.00 37 JUL 24r 1'978 <30.00 37 JUL .) 4 r 1978 <80.00

.37 JUL 24r 15'78 <Soioo 37 AUG'1r 1978- <80roo 37 AUG 21r 197S- <80+00 37 AUG 21r 15'78 <Soroo 37, SEP 25t 1978 <80.00 3? SEP 25r 1 5'78 <Soioo 37 SEP 25t 1973 <Soeoo 37 OCT 23r 1 5'78 <Soioo 37 OCT 23r 15'78 <30.00 37 OCT 23r 15'78 <80.00 37 MAY 1979 <30.00 37 MAY 22r 1979 <130 00 F

37 MAY 22r 1979 <80ioo 37 JUH 25r 1979 <Soroo 37 JUH 25r 1 5'79 <80roo 37 JUH 25r 1979 <Soroo 37 JUL 24r 1979 <30roo 37 JUL 1 5'79 <80roo 37 JUL 24r 1979 <Soooo 37 AUG 21r 1979 <80.00 37 AUG 21r 1979 <30 F 00 37 AUG 21r 1979 <Soioo 37 SEP 18r 1979 <80+00 37 SEP 18r 1 975'979

<80+00 37 SEP 13r <SO,OO 37 OCT 22r 1 5'79 <Soooo 37 OCT 22r <Soroo 37 OCT 22r 1975'975'9SO

<80.00 37 MAY Sr <Soooo 37 MAY 8r 1 5'80 <Soroo 4-184

Tab1e 4-7.9 (continued)

PRODUCE AHALYSIS:

UNITS'IRCONIUM-95 r-C 1/kd STATION DATE CONCENTRATION TMO SIGHA 37 JUH 23r 1980 <80o00

'37 JUH 23r 1980 <80r00 37 JUL 21r 1980 <80r00 37 JUL 21r 1980 <80r00 I

JUL 21r 1980 <80r00 37 AUG 19r 1980 <80+00 37 AUG 19r 1980 <80r00 37 AUG 19r 1980 <80+00 37 SEP 23r 1980 <80i00 37 SEP 23r 1980 <30r00 37 SEP 23r 1980 <80.00 37 JUH 23r 1981 <80+00 37 JUH 23r 1981 <80r00 37 JUH 23r 1981 <80+00 37 JUL 21r 1981 <80.00 37 JUL 2ir 1981

~ <80e00 37 JUL 21r 1981 <80.00 37 AUG 18 r 1'981 <80 F 00 37 AUG 18r 1981 <80r00 37 AUG 18r 1981 <80r00 37 SEP 22r 1981 <80r00 37 SEP 22r 1981 <80r00 37 SEP 22r 1981 <80.00

~ ~

4-185 h C " h5 4 h h

' = h h ' h ~ h hhlPY 5' h ~ h ( - Ph>> 'le' Py h P~ hh.h hh 'hh 'V h ~ Vh h heal ~ ~ ~

• ~

Table 4-8.0 GUARTERl Y TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STANDARD STATION EHD DATE DAYS (MR/DAY) DEVIATION JUH 30>> 1'9 78 ~ 91 0.3118 0.0897 SEP 29r 1978 90 Oo2081 0>>0242 JAH 21 1979 95 o. 4411 Oii972 MAR 30>> 1979 87 0>>2376 Oi0217

. JUN 29r 1979 91 0+1357 0>>0609 SEP 28>> 1979

'1 0.1953 oo0519 JAH '7 t 1980 95 0+2571 0+0845 MAR 28>> 1980 86 Oi2985 0.0888 MAR 28>> 1980 81 0'. 2377 0+0467 JUN 27>> 1980 . 91 0 i 2912 0>>1347 1 SEP 26r 1980 91 0.2775 0.1598 1 SEP 26>> 1980 91 Oi2629 Oo0389 1 DEC 31>> 1980 96 0>>2937 0.1728 1 DEC 31>> 1980 93 0>>1914 0 '094 MAR 27>> 1981 86 0.4404 0.1888 MAR 27r 1981 86 0 i 3031 Oo0270 1 JUH 26r 1'981 91 0 i 2780 0.0434 1 a JUH 26>> 1981 91 0>>1890 0.0147 SEP 25>> 1981 91 0.2390 0>>0463 SEP 25>> 1981 ,91 Oi2234, 0.0093 1 DEC 31>> 1981 97 0 2358 0 08 5 1 DEC 31>> 1981 97 0>>1931 0>>0373 1 MAR 26r 1982 85 ~

oo2679 0>>0740 MAR 26>> 1982 85 0.2235 0.0129 1 JUiH ~5r 1982 91 0.2072 0>0096 SEP 24>> 19S2 91 0 i 2238 0>>0206 1 DEC 30r 1982 97 0.2632 0.0142 APR 1>> 1983 92 0.211S Oo0068 1 JUL ir 1983 91 0>>2578 O.O111 SEP 30>> 1983 91 0.24SS 0+0017 DEC 29r 1983 90 Oo2596 0+0253 2 JUH 30>> 1978 91 0 i 2313 0>>0855 2 SEP 29r 1978 90 0.1981 oo0195 2 . JAH 2t 1979 95 0>>3668 0.1174 2 MAR 30>> 1979 87 0>>2195 0+0264 2 JUH 29r 1979 91 0>>2261 0 i 0323 SEP 28>> 1979 91 0>>2022 0.0431':

2 JAH 2 ~ 1980 95 Oe2342 0.0305

• 2 MAR 28>> 1980 86 Oo3032 Oi0762 2 MAR 2Sr 1980 81 0.2500 0 03',l l, o

2 JUH 27 1 1980 91 Oe3621 0 i 1264 2 SEP 26>> 1980 91 0.2527 O.O36O 2 SEP 26r 1980 91 0+2835 Oo'0213 DEC 3it 1980 96 0.2271 0'628

'1 DEC 31>> 1980 93 Oo2147 ,"Oi 0102 2 MAR 27>> 1981 Sh Oo4424 0>>1617 4-186

Table 4-8.0 (continued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STANDARD STATION EHD DATE DAYS (HR/DAY) DEVIATION 2 HAR 27r 1981 86 0.2523 0+0231 JUN 26r 1981 91 0 '706 0 i 0623 2 JUN 26r 1981 91 0.1810 Oo0092 A SEP 25f 1981 91 Or2519 0.0121 SEP 25t 1981 91 Or2368 0.0320, 2 DEC 31r 1981 97 Or2691 0.0631 DEC 31r 1981 97 Or1700 Or0107 2 MAR 26r 1982 85 0 i 2597 Oo0217 MAR 26r 1982 85 Or2300 0.0416 JUH 25f 1982 91 Oi1940 Or0253 2 SEP 24r 1982 91 Oi2~~4 Oi0147 2 DEC 30 r 1982 97 Or2489 0.0114 APR lr 1983 92 Or2139 0 F 0100 2 JUL 1983 91 0.2526 0+0130 2 SEP 30r 1983 91 0.2472 .0.0151 DEC 29r 1983 90 Or2318 0.0047 JUH 30r 1978 91 0.2538 Oo02~5 SEP 29r 1978 90 0 i 1875 0.0192 JAN 2r".1979 95 0+3239 Or0383 MAR 30r 1979 87 Oi2526 0.0461 JUN 29r 1979 91 0 211.5 Oo0146 3 'EP 28r 1979 91 Or2058 0.0412 3 JAH 2r 1980 95 Or2163 Or0556 3 o MAR 28r 1980 86 Oo2648 Or0287 3 ~

MAR 28r 1980 81 Or2438 0.0370 3 JUH 27r 1980 Or3003 0.1262 SEP 26r 1980 91 0 i 2791 0.1050 SEP 26r 1980 91 Oi1907 0+0374 DEC 31F 1980 96 0.3581 0.1086 DEC '31r 1980 93 Or2158 Or0195 HAR 27r 1981 86 Or4349 0.2385 3 HAR 27r 1981 86 Or2526 0.0293.

3 JUN 26r 1981 91 Or2816 Or0256 3 JUH 26r 1981 91 Ori783 Or0049 3 SEP 25r 1981 91 Or2385 0.0416 3 SEP 25r 1981 91 0 '958 Or0192 3 DEC 31r 1981 97, Or2168 Ot0991 3 DEC 31r 1981 97 0.1713 Or0108 HAR 26r 1982 85 0 '515 0.0925 3 MAR 26r 1982 85 0 i 2185 Or0138 3 JUH 25r 1982 91 Or2145 Oi0123 3 SEP 24r 1982 91 Or2051 0+0154 3 DEC 30 r 1982 97 Oi2407 0 i 0096 3 APR ir 1983 92 Or2020 Or0086 3 JUL ir 1983 91 Or2423 Oo0211 30r 1983 91 0+2238 Oo0698 4-187

Table 4-0.0 (continued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STATION EHD DATE DAYS (MR/DAY>'TANDARD DEUIATIOH DEC 29r 1983 90 Or2254 Ot0334 JUN 30r 1978 91 0+2099 Or0585 SEP 29t 1978 90 0+1856 0.0265 JAN 1979 95 0 i 3089 Oo1024 MAR 30t 1979 87 0+2224 0.0241 4 JUN 29r 1979 91 Or1923 Or0204 4 SEP 28t 1979 91 0.1920 Or0424 JAH 2r 1980 95 Oo1939 Oo0270 MAR 28r 1980 .86 0+2547 0+0509 4 MAR 28t 1980 81 Or2037 Or1038 JUH 27r 1980 91 Ot3429 Ot2788 4 SEP 26t 1980 91 0.2530 doi100 SEP 26r 1980 91 0.1964 0.0182 DEC 3ir 19SO 96 0.2680 Oo0738 DEC 3it 1980 93 Or2050 Oo0151 MAR $ 7r 1981 86 0'779 Oo1745 MAR 27t 1'981 86 0+4054 Oo0824 JUN 2hr 1981 91 Or2473 0)0554 JUH 2hr 1981 '91 0+1607 Or0021 SEP 25t 1981 91 Or2176 Or0433 SEP 25t 1981 91 0+1887 Or0119 4 DEC 31r 19.81 97 Or2211 Or0505 DEC 31r 1981 97 Or1742 Or0068 HAR 2ht 1982 85'5 Ot2382 Or0597 MAR 26r 1932 0 '768 0.0587 JUN 251 1982 91 Oo1667 Ot0312 SEF 24t 1982 91 0+2034 0.0071 DEC 30r 1982 97 0.2495 Or0544 APR ir 1983 92 Oe1955 0.0090 JUL 1983 91 0.2297 Ot0156 4 SEP 30r 1983 91 Or 2165 Oi0328 4 DEC 30r 1983 91 0.2229 Or0066 5 JUH 30t 1978 91 Oo2321 0 i 0676 5 SEP 29r 1978 90 Or1772 Or0221 5 JAil 2r 1979 95 Or2637 Oo1027 5 HAR 30t 1979 87 0.20S6 Oo0380 L

JUN 29t 1979 91 0.2148 Or0472 5 SEP 28r 1979 91 0 i 1964 Ot0306 5 JAH i980 95 0.1800 0.0608 C'

HAR 28r 1980 86 0.2477 Ot0068 MAR 28r 1980 81 0.1852 Or0638 5 JUH 27r 1980 91 Ot3387 Oti942 SEP 26r 1980 91 0.1599 0.1005 5 SEP 26t 1980 91 Oo1459 Or0111 5 DEC 31t 1980 96 0 ".885 Ooi432 4-188

Table 4-8.0 (continued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STAHDARD STATIOH EHD DATE DAYS <Mj:rDAY> DEUIATIOH C'

DEC 31r 1980 93 Ooj373 0.0087 HAR 27 r 1981 86 Or3645 Ooj660 5 HAR 27r 1981 86, 0.2294 0.0029 5 JUH 26r 1981 Oo2569 Oo0262 C'

JUH 26r 1981 .91 Oii629 Or0077 SEP 25r 1981 91 Oi2255 Oi0666 5 SEP 25r 1981 91 Oi2 114 0.0084 5 DEC 31r 1981 97 Or2768 0.0135 5 DEC 3ir 1981 97 0+2076 0,0085 5 HAR 26r 1982 85 0.2715 0.0204 5 'HAR 26r 1982 85 Or2153 0 '096 5 JUH 25r 1982 91 Oi2025 0.0155 C'

SEP 24r 1982 91 0+2124 0.0067 DEC 30r 1982 97 0.2429 0 i 0066 5 APR . ir 1983 0.2080 Oo0038 C JUL ir 1983 0>2477 0)0203 SEP 30r 1983 91 0.2287 0.0279 DEC 30r 1983 91 0+2294 0)0283 JUH 30r 1978 91 0+2201 Oo0888 29r 1978 90 0+1825 Oi0165 6 JAH 1979 ~ 95 Oo3500 0+1815 6 HAR 30r 1979 87 0>2124 Or024'9 6 JUH 29r 1979 91 0+2080 Oi0350 6 SEP 28r 1979 0.1871 Oi0248 JAH 1980 95 Oo2358 Oi0718'.0661 6 HAR 28r 1980 86 Oo2297 6 MAR 28r 1980 81 0+2346 0+0349 6 JUH 27r 1980 Oo2698 Oo0908 SEP 26r 1980 91 0+2566 0.1219 SEF'EC.

26r 1980 91 Ooj582 0.0253 31 r 1980 96 Oo3138 Oi0589 DEC 3ir 1980 93 0+2061 Oe0106 6 HAR Q7 f 1981 86 Oi4398 0.0529 MAR 27r 1981 86 0 i2934 OI1908 6 JUH 26r 1981 ~

91 Oi2514 Oi0204 6 JUH 26r 1981 91 0 i 1497 0.0120 6 SEP 25r 1981 91 Or2225 Oi0258 SEP 25r 1981 91 Oo2086 0.0252 DEC 31r 1981 97 0+2387 Oo0188 6 DEC 31r 1981 97 Oij644 Oo0051 6 HAR 26r 1982 85 Oi2612 0+0523 6 MAR 26r 1982 85 Or2165 Oi0148 6 JUH 25r 1982 91 0+2003 Or0069 6 SEP 24r 1982 91 Oi2086 0 i 0096 6 DEC 30r 1982 97 Oi2300 0+0122 6 APR ir 1983 0.2047 0<0076 4-189

Table 4-8.0 (continued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELA'PSEUD DOSE RATE STANDARD STATION EHD DATE DAYS 'MR/DAY) DEVIATION JUL 1t 1983 91 0.2380 SEP DEC 30t 1983 29t 1983 91 90 oo2191'+0209

'0(2258 oooa53 0 ~ 0105 JUH 30t 1978 Oi2280 0+0811 7 SEP 29t 1978 90 0+2011 oooaa6 7 JAN 2t 1979 95 Ot3268 Oia207 7 ilAR 30r 1979 87 Oi2230 oo'0496.

7 JUH 29t 1979 91 Oti995 0 '426 7 SEP 28r 1979 91 0.2008 Ot0447 7 JAH 2r 1980 95 oo2266 0.0495 7 MAR 28 t '1980 86 0,2948 0+0417 7 MAR 28r 1980 81 0)2407 Ot0473 JLlN 27 t 1980 91 Or3283 Ooa297 7 SEP 26r 1980 91 Oo2190 0.0347 7 SEP 26r 1980 91 0.2390 0 i 0396 7 DEC 31t 1980 96 0.3044 Oo0438 7 DEC 31t 1980 93 0.2125 0+0124 7 MAR 27 t 1981 86 Oi5195 Oo5599 7 MAR 27r 1981 86 0 i 2752 Oo0484 7 JUH, 26t 1981 ~ 91 Oi 2563 Oto577 7 JUN 26r 1981. 91 ooa681 0.0097 7 SEP 25 t 1981 91 Ot2489. Ot0440 7 ~

SFP 25t 1981 91 Oo2054 Ot0086 7 DEC 31r 1981 ~

97 Ot2631 0.1138 7 DEC 3ir 1981 0.1760 0.0074 7 MAR 26t 1982 85 Q 273 .) 0)0655 7 MAR 26t 1982 85 oo2241 0 '149 7 JUH 1982 91 0.2131 0.0207 7 SEP 24r 1982 91 Oi2220 0 i 0068 7 'DEC 30t 1982 97 Q 456 oo0061

.7 APR 11 1983 92 Ot2124 Oo0024 7 JUL 1983 91 Oo2504 Ot0193 7 SEP 3ot 19s3 '91 Ot2469 0.0395 7 DEC 29t 1983 90 0.2333 Oi0397 8 JUN 30 t. 1978 91 0.2723 0.0774 8 SEP 29t 1978 90 0.2050 0 i 0172 8 JAN 21 1979 95 Oo3547 Or1663 8 MAR 30t 1979 87 Ot2325 Oo0435 8 JUiH 29t 1979 91 Or2338 Ot0608 8 SEP 28t 1979 91 oo2291 Oi0462 8 JAiH 2t 1980 95 Ot2489 Oo0404 8 MAR 28t 1980 86 Oo3221 Ot0672 8 MAR 28t 1980 81 0.2654 Ot0428 8 JUN a9so 91 Oi3261 ooa049 8 SEP 26t 1980 91 Oo2915 0.0831 4-19o

~, ~~ ~4 ~

Table 4-8.0 (continued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELAF'SED DOSE RATE STANDARD STATION EHD DATE DAYS (MR/DAY) DEVZAT OH 8 SEP 26r 1980 91 0.2703 0.0346 8 DEC 31t 1980 96 0+3464 Ot2606 8 DEC 31r 1980 93 Oi2434 0.0183 8 MAR 27 t 1981 S6 Oi4477 Or2228 8 HAR 27 t 1981 86 Ot2608 0+0177 8 JUN 26t 1981 91 Or3255 Oo0138 8 JUN 26r 1981 91 0.1953 0.0342 8 SEP 25t 1981 91 Oo2868 Oi0395 8 SEP 25r 1981 91 0 '433 Ot0309 8 DEC 31t 1981 97 Oo3260 Oo0779 8 DEC 31r 1981 97 0.2117 Oi0364 8 MAR 26t 1982 85 0.2747 . 0.0369 8 MAR 26r 1982 85 0+2474 Oipi22 8 JUH 1982 Oo2382 0 i 0117 8 SEP 24r 1982 91 0.2469 0.0138 8 DEC 301 19S2 97 0+2836 0.0108 8 APR lr 1983 92 0.2355 0.0052 8 JUL 1t 1983 91 Ot2794 0.0140 8 SEP 30r 1983 91 . Oo2693 Oi0270 8 DEC 30r983 91 0..2663 Ot0178 JUW 30r 1978 91 0.2008 ~

0+0151

, SEP 29t 1978 90 Or1942 Oi0351 JAH 2r 1 9'79 95 0.3013 Ot0875 HAR 30r 1979 87 0 '109 0.0165 9 JUH 29r 1979 91 .0.1885 0+0219 9 SEP 2sr 1979 91 O,18S5 Oo0373 "9 JAH 1980 95 0.2066 0.0760 9 HAR 28r 1980 86 Oo2555 0.0509 9 MAR 28r 1980 81 Oo2407 Oi0588 9 JUH 27r 980 91 0.3077 Oo0712 9, SEP 26t 1980 91 0.2151 .0.1252 9 SEF 26t 1980 91 0.2076 0.0217 9 DEC 3ir 1980 96 0.2576 0.1246 9 ' DEC 31r 1980 9,3 0.2036 Oi0045 HAR 27t 1981 86 0.2334 0 '904 MAR 27t 1981 86 0.2314 0.0195 9 JUH 26t 1981 91 0+2723 0+0440 9 JUH 26r 1981 91 HS 9 SEP 25 r 1981 91 0~2247 Oo0530 SEP 25t 1981 91 Ot2002 Oi0092 DEC 3ir 1981 97 0.2843 Ot0259 31t 1981 97 Oo1430 Oo0059 HAR 26t 1982 85 0 i 2274 Or0478 HAR 26r 1982 85 Ot2126 Ot0082 JUN 25r 1982 91 Ot1726 Oi0776 SEP 24t 1982 91 0)2088 Oooii7 4-191,

Tab1e 4-8.0 (continued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STAHDARD

.STATIOH EHD DATE DAYS

---

DEV IATIOH DEC 30t 1982 97 0)2265 0)0084 APR 1r 1983 92 O)2052 0)0049 JUL it 1983 91 0)2345 0)0161 SEP 30r 1983 91 0)2363 0+0431, DEC 30t 1983 91 0)2296 0)0190 10 JUH 30t 1978 91 0)2214 0+0442 10 SEP 29t 1978 90 0+1650 0)0246 10 JAH 21 1979 95 0.2889 0)0669 10 MAR 30t 1979 87 0.2353 0)0243 10 JUH 29t 1979 91 0.2330 0.0712 10 SEP 28t 1979 91 0)1926 0.0575 10 JAH 2t 1980 95 0)2608 0)0419 10 HAR .28 t 1980 86 0)3044 0)0464 10 MAR 28t 1'980 sa 0)1667 0)0473 10 JUH 27t 1'980 91 0.2429 0)aoah 10 SEP 26t 1980 91 .0) 2365 O,1288 10 SEP 26t 1980 '91 O)2379 O;0327 ao DEC 3it 1980 96 0)3307 0.2148 10 DEC 31t 1980 '93 0)1530 .0)0257 10 MAR 27r 1981 86 0)2218 0)2681 10 ,HAR 27t 1981 86 '0+2901 0+0718 10 JUH 26t '1981 91 0)2610 0.0561 10 JUH 26r 1981 91 ~

0)1810 0+0177 ao SEP 25t 1981 91 0)2000 0)2711 10 SEP 25t 1981 91 0.2108 0)0203 10 DEC 31t 1981 97 O)2784 0)0670 10 DEC 3it 1981 97 0)1694 0.0105 10 MAR 26t 1'982 85 0)2450 0)0590 10 HAR 20t 1982 85 0)2200 0)0019 10 JUH 25t 1982 91 o. a2o 0)0078 10 SEP 24t 1982 91 0.2177 0.0095 10 DEC 30t 1982 97 0)2389 0)0101 10 *PR ir 1983 0)2123 0.0136 10 JUL 1983 91 0.2518 0)0129 10 SEP 30t 1983 91 0)2439 0)0512 10 DEC 29t 1983 90 0)2306 0)0104 11 JUH 30t 1978 '91 0)2621 0)0673 ai SEP 29t 1978 90 0)1897 0)0305 11 JAH 2t 1979 95 0+3226 O)0761 MAR 30t 1979 87 0)2572 0)0568 JUH 29t 1979 91 0.2140 0)0356 li 11 SEP JAH 28t 1979 1980 91 95 0)2047 0.2371 0)0388 0.0261, 11 MAR 28t 1980 86 0)2878 0)0248 ii MAR 28t 1980 81 0)2562 0.0583

Table 4-8.0

'continued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELAF'SED DOSE RATE STAHDARD STATIOH EHD DATE DAYS < tili/DAY) DEvrArrot<

11 JUH 277 1980 91 0.3214 0.3039 ia SEF'EP 267 1980 91 0.2231 Oc0958 aa 267 1980 91 0 ~ 2217 Oc0237

.11 DEC 317 1980 96 0.2620 0'c 1244 11 DEC 317 1980 93 oi2125 0.0025 fa MAR 277 1981 86 Oe3660 o,f76a 11 HAR 277 1981 86 Oe2357 0.0299 JUH 267 1981 91 0.2964 Oc0658 JUH 267 1981 91 "0.1794 Oopifs ii ia SEP SEP 257 257 19sa 1981 91 91 Oc2742 0.2153 0>0366 0.0131 11 DEC 317 1981 97 .Oo2871 Ocoi31, 267 1982 85 0 585 Oc0525

~

.11

=-11..

~

MAR JUH 267 257 1982 1982 85 91-0<2276 Oc2304 Ocpioh 0.0121 SEP 247 1982 91 Oc2192 Oo0137 DEC 307 1982 97 0.2501 0.0183 AF'R a ~ 1983 Oo2133 0.0059 JUL 17 1983 91 0.2439 0+Oi52 SEF 307 1983 91 Oc2476 Oc0195 DEC 297 1983 90 0+2341 Oi0356 12 JUH 307 1978 91 Oc2679 Oc0957 12 SEP 297 1978 90 0.2167 Ocpi73 12 JAN 7 1979 95 0.3908 Oci489 12 t l*R 307 1979 87 0.2382 0+0271 12 JUH 297 1979 91 Oo2258 0.0318 12 SEP 287 1979 91 P A/20 0+0322 12 JAH 27 1980 95 pc2761 0.0877 12 HAR 287 1980 86 0 '145 Oo0724 12 HAR 287 1980 81. Oc2623 070370 f2 JUH 277 1980 91 Oc3047 0)4355 12 SEP 267 1980 91 Oo2549 O.2166 SEP 267 1980 91 0.2352 Oc0283 f2 DEC 317 1980 96 Oc4052 0.1367 f .7 DEC 317 1980 93 0+2337 Oc0076 12 HAR 277 1981 86 Oc4119 Oc4263 12 HAR 277 1981 86 Oc3081 Oi0230 12 JUH 267 1981 91 0.2920 Oc0577 12 JUH 267 1981 91 0+195i Ocofi7 12 SEP 257 1981 91 Oo2857 Oc0225 SEP 257 1981 91 0+2359 Oc0204 f2 DEC 317 1981 97 0.3044 Oo0293 12 DEC 317 1981 97 0+1852 Oo0187 12 HAR 267 1982 85 Oc2674 Oc0640 12 MAR 267 1982 85 0.2356 0.0068 12 JUH 257 1982 91 Oc2292 0+0082 4-193

'lay - 4 Qp 'I wy $ P( ~ ', Soy% v 0 ' 7v -,q<<A ~, ylkll I ih'I

'Tab1e 4-3.0

~

(continued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STAHDARD STATION EHD DATE D*YS (HR/DAY> DE')IATlOH 12 SEP 1982 91 Oi 2353 0.0106 DEC30 t 1982 97 Or 2719) Oo0068 12 APR 1 r 1983 92 Or e9 O,O114 12 JUL lt 1983 SEP 30r 1983 91 91 Ot 2729 Or 2711 Oooi30 0.0302 12 12 DEC 29t 1983 90 Oi 2494 0+0080 13 JUH 30t 1978 0+ 2346 Or0485 13 SEP 29t 1978 90 Or 1975 Oroi60 13 JAN 2t 1979 95 Or 3284 Oo1014 13 MAR 30t 1979 87 Or 2247 0.0166 13 JUH 29r 1979 91 Oo ,2299 Oo0476 13 'SEP 28t 1979 91 Oo 2091 Orol92 13 JAH 2r 1980 95 Oo 2655 Ot0451 MAR 28t 1980 86 Oe 2788 0)0580 13 HAR 28t 1980 81 Ot 2469 0.0451 14 JUH 27t 1980 91 Ot 2777 0.1124 13 SEP 2ht 19SO 91 0 ~ 2516 0.1003 13 SEP 2ht 1980 .91 .Oo 2225 Or0394 13 DEC 3lr 1980 96 Ot 3443 0~1796 13 DEC 31t 1980 'P3 Or 2~11 0 i 0130 13 HAR 27r 1981 86 Or 3762 0.1753 HAR 27r 1981 86 HR 13 JUH 26t 1981 91 Or 2945 0.0970 13 JUH 26t 1981 91 Or 1643 Oo0068 13 SEP 25 t 1981 91 0'i 2712 Ot0757 13 SEP 25t 1981 91 0 ~ 2195 0.0156 13 DEC 3ir 1981 97 Oo 2802 Ot0331 13 DEC 31r 1981 97 Oi 189t 0.0096 13 MAR 2hr 1982 85 Oi 635 Oo0368 13 MAR 26t 1982 85 Os gg53 0.0128 13 JUH 25t 1982 91 Or 2231 Oo0088 13 SEP 24t 1982 91 Or 2199 Oooi24 13 DEC 30r 1982 97 Oi 541 Or0097 13 APR lr 1983 '92 Or 2109 Or0028 13 JUL .lr 1983 91 Or 2544 0.0171 13 SEP 30r 1983 91 Oo 2537 Or0128 13 DEC 29r 1983 90 Or 2300 0.0135 14 JUN 30t,1978 91 Or2404 0.0453 14 SEP 29r 1978 90 Or1906 Oi0292 14 JAH 2t 1979 95 Or3476 Oo0484 14 HAR 30t 1'9 79 87 0.2353 Or0447 14 JUH 29r 1979 91 Oo2110 0 i 0505 14 .SEP 28t 1979 91 0.1956 0.0177 14 J*H 19SO 95 Oe2211 Oooi58 14 'MAR 28r 1980 86 0.2584 Oo0575 HAR 28r 19SO 81 Ot2407 Oi0319 4-194

Tab1e 4-8.0 (coni:inued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STANDARD STATIOH EiND DATE DAYS (MR/DAY) DEVIATION 14 JUiH 271 1980 91 ,HS 14 SEP 26r 1 5'80 91 0+ 2555 ooaa95 14 SEP 26r 1980 91 '.0+2319 Oo0406 14 DEC 31r a5so 96 0.2539 Oo0326 14 'DEC 31 r 1980 93 .:: Oo2022 Oi0022 a4 MAR 27r 1981 86 0.5145 0. 265'3 MAR 27t 1981 86 0.2567 Ot0286 14 JUN 26r 1981 91 Oo2407 Oi0772 14 JUN 2ht 1981 '. 9'1 0.1703 Oi0205 14 SEP 25r 1981 'gi .:: o,254a Oo0529 14 SEP 25t 1981 5'1;:" 0 '357 0.0102 14 DEC 3it 1981 5'7: ~

Or3041 Oi0550 14 DEC 31r 1981 97'5 0.1712 Oi0051 a4 MAR 26r 1982 Or2553 0 i 0320 14 MAR 2hr 1982 85 0+2991 Oi 0494 JUH 25r 1982 oa Oi2229 0.0167 SEP 24r 1982 5'1 0.2184 oooia2 14 DEC 30r 1982 97 oo2460 0.0116 14 APR lt 1983 0.2065 Oi0085 14 JUL ir 1983 91 0<2574 Or0352 14 SEP 30r 1983 5'1 0+2586 Ot0263 14 DEC 29t 1983 90 0+2306 0.0177 15 JUH 30t 1978 91 Oi2525 0.0684 15 SEP 29t 1978 90 oia925 Or 0061 15 JAH 2t 1979'979 95 Oo3797 0.2183 15 MAR 30t 87 Oi4744 Oi0455 15 JUiH 29t 1979 91 Oo2387 Po0692 15 SEP 28r 1979 5'1 0 '223 Oe0326 15 JAN 2 ~ 1980 95 Oo2687 Ot0797 15 MAR 28r 1980 86 0.1730 oo2143 15 MAR 28r 1980 81 oo2901 Oi0428 15 JUN 27r 1980 91 Oi2544 ooa579 15 SEP 26r .1980 91 Ot2541 Ot1135 15 SEP 26r 1980 91 Or3341 Ooak'37' 15 DEC 31t 1980 96 Or2927 '65'1 15 DEC 31t 1980 93 oo2685 0.0204-

'l 5 MAR 27r 1981 86 Or2674 0.,3344 15 MAR 27r 1981 86 Oi2581 0'i 0264 15 JUH 26r 1981 91 Oi2997 .0.0333 15 JUH 26r 1981 91 oia846 'Oo0047 15 . SEP 25r 1981 91 0.2418 'i0779 15 SEP 25r 1981 91 Oi2301 0.0113 15 DEC 31t 1981 97 Oi3049 Qooala 15 DEC 31r 1981 97 Oo2303 0.0087 15 MAR 26r 1982 85 0.2712 0+0837 15 26r 1982 85 Oi2815 " Oo0460 4-a95

Table 4-8.0 (continued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STANDARD STATION EHD DATE DAYS < MR/DAY) DEVIATION 15 JUH 25 ~ 1982 91 0.2523 oo0151 15 SEP 1982 91 0.2351 o,oa54 15 DEC 30t 1982 97 Ot2629 Oooi75 15 15 APR JUL it 1983 1983 9

91, Ot2259 Ot2620 0.0109 Ot0279 15 SEP 30t 1983 ~

91 Ot2559 Ot0476 15 DEC 29t 1983 90 Ot2462 Ot0316 16 JUH 30t 1978 91 Ot2236 Oe0733 lh SEP 29r 1978 90 Ot 2189 0.1082 16 JAN. 2 t 1979 95 Ot3721 o,lao4 16 MAR 30t 1979. 87 .Ot2468 Ot0324 16 JUH 29t 1979 ~

91 0.2288 Oo0721 16 SEP 28t 197'9 91 0.2245 Ot0439 16 JAN 2t 1980 95 0+2829 0.0617 16 MAR 28 t. 1980 86 0.~6"2 oo0190 16 MAR 28t 1980 81. 0)2623 0.0370 ih JUH 27t 1980 91 Oo3577. ooaa46

.16 SEP 26t 1980 91 0.2272 Oti098 ih SEP 26t 1980 91 Ot2236 0.0205 16 31t 1980 96 Oo2781 o,aa26 1 b. DEC 31 t 1980 93 0+2520 O.oihl 16 MAR 27 t 1981 86 0 i 2468 o ~

3a'i0206 16 MAR 27 t 1981 86 0+2497 16 JUH 26t 1981 91 Oo3005 Oi0438 16 JUH 26t 1981 91 ooa731 0.0073 16 SEP 25t 1981 '91 oi2462 0.0514 16 SEP +5 1981 91 Oo2405 oi0142 16 DEC 3it 1981 97 0' 3330 0 i 0472 16 DEC 31t 1981 97 0+ajjh 0 i 0168 16 MAR 26t 1982 85 Oo2703'+2341 Oi 0466 16 MAR 26t 1982 85 Oioa49 16 JUH 25t 1982 '91 0 t 2471 Ot0086 16 SEP 24r 1982 91 0 i 2239 0.0112 16 DEC 30t 1982 97 Ot2610 oooa33 16 APR lt 1983 92 0.2189 0.0005 16 JUL 1983 91 Ot2588 0.0343 16 SEP 30t 1983 91 Oo2545 Oioi28 ih DEC 29t 1983 90 Ot2307 oioa69 17 JUH 30r 1978 91 Ot2420 Oti543 17 SEP 29t 1978 90 0>2028 Oi0168 17 J*iH 2 r 1979 95 Ot3629 0.1244 17 MAR 30t 1979 87 Oi229~ Ot0472 17 JUH 29r 1979 91 Ot2223 0 i 0232 17 SEP 28t 1979 91 0.2288 Oi0835 17 JkiH 2t 1980 95 0+2687 Oi0454 4-196

Table 4-3.0 (continued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STAHD*RD STATIOH Ei~l D DATE DAYS (MR/DAY> DEVIATION 17 28t 1980 86 Oi 2491 0.0270 17 MAR 28t 1980 81 0.2593 0.0349 17 JUH 27t 1980 91 Or2725 0.1422 17 SEP 2ht 1980 91 0.2470 Or1475 17 SEP 26t 1980 91 0.2277 Oe0290 17 DEC 31t 1980 96 0+3076 Or1212 17 . DEC 31r 1980 93 Or2455 0.0207 17 MAR 27t 1981 86 Oi3547 0.2080 17 MAR 27r 1981 86 Or2378 0.0055 17 JUH 26t 1981 91 Or2717 Oo0552 17 JUH 26t 1981 91 Or1690 0 i 0144 17 SEP 25t 1981 91 Or2555 Oo0562 17 SEP 25r 1981 91 Or2263 0+0034 17 DEC 31t 1981 97 Oo3903 0.0300 17 DEC 31r 1981 97 Or1795 0.0194 17 MAR 26r 1982 85 0 756 0.0940 17 MAR 2hr 1982 85 0.2297 Or0129 17 JUH 251 1982 91 0.2475 0.0072 17 SEP 24r 1982 91 0)24~5 Oe0065 17 DEC 30t 1982 97 0.2631 Or0066 17 APR lr 1983 92 0.2133 Or0080 17 JUL 1983 91 Or2614 0 t 0281 17 SEP 30t 1'983 91 0 >567 Or0196 17 29t 1983 90 Oo2612 Or0376 18 JUH 30r 1978 91 'Or3143 0+0494 18 SEP 29t 1978 90 0.1928 Oo0264 18 ,.JAH 1979 95 Oi3832 0.1601 18 30t 1979 87 Oo2497.. Or0801 18 JUH 29' 1979 91 0+2~14 Or0178 18 28t 1979 91 0.2000 0<0109 18 JAH 2t 1980 95 Oo2547 0.0941 18 MAR 28t 1980 86 Oi2622 Or0217 18 MAR 28r 1980 81 Or2469 Or0533 is JUH 27t 1980 91 0.2846'r2456 Or1656 18 SEP 26r 1'980 91 0+0678 18 SEP 26t 1980 91 Oi2420 Or0214 18 DEC 3ir 1980- 96 0+2521 '. Or0638 18 DEC 31t 1980 93 Oe2219 0,0407 18 MAR 27t 1981 86 0+2669 Oo1826, 18 MAR 27r 1981 86 0.2341 0.0097 18 JUH 26r 1981 91 Or2646 0.0257 18 JUH 26t 1981 91 Or1615 Or0090 18 SEP 1'981 91 0.2486 Or0813 18 SEP 25 t 1981 91 Or 2112 Or0048 18 DEC 31 r 1981 97 Or3093 Or0517 18 DEC 31t 1981 97 0.2038 Or0060 4-197

I ~ *A i '

4 J, "

~ .6)44 ."1, ~ ~: ~ .', ~'dL '4 ~ Iiv 8+49EAA (h Table 4-8.0 (continued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STANDARD STATION EiHD D*TE DAYS (MR/DAY) DEVIATE'OH 18 MAR 26r 1982 85 0 i 2359 0.0616 18 M*R 26r 1982 S5 0.2382 oi0131 18 JUiH 25 t 1982 91 0.2425 0.0217 18 SEP 24r 1982 91 u Oi2281 Or0104 18 30r 1982 97 Or2597 Or0111 18 APR 1983 92 Or2190 Oo0064 18 JUL 1983 91 Or2547 Oi0165 18 SEP 30r 1983 91 0 i 2563 0.0360 18 DEC 29r 1983 90 0)2402 I 0.0247 JUN 30r 1978 91 0.2503 Oo0838 19 SEP 29r 1978 90. 0.2072 0.0180 19 JAN 1979 95 Oi3961 Oo0776 MAR 30r 1979 .87 Oo2250 0.0170

19 JUH 29r 1979 91 0.2033 0>0223 19 . SEP 28r 1979 91 0.2168 0.0363 19'9 JAH 1980 95 0.2803 ooaa00 MAR 28r 1980 86 0.2523 0.0198 MAR 281 1980 ~ 81 0.1636 Oi0370 JUN 27r 1980 91 Qi3591 Or1350 SEP 26r '980 91 0+2970 Oo2179 19 SEP 26r 1980 '9l oo2341 Oi0289 19 DFC 31t 1980 ~ 96 Oo3776 0.0972 19 DEC 3it 1980 93 Oo1545 Or0215 19 MAR 27t 1981 86 0.3541 0.0892 19 MAR 27r 1981 86 0.4517 Oi0082 19 JUH 26r 1981 91 Oo3000 Oi0606 19 JUN 26t 19S1 91 0.1750 0.0038 19 SEP 25) 1981 91 Oo2945 Ot0363 19 SEP 25t 1981 91 oe2145 Oe0122 19 DEC 31t 1981 97 0.3a91 Or0297 19 DEC 31r 1981 97 Or1783 Ot0132 19 MAR 26t 1982 85 Or2559 Or0690 19 M*R 26r 1982 85 Oi2253 0+0128 JUN 25t 1982 91 Oo2257 Ot0103 19 SEP 24r 1982 91 Or2271 0.0145 19 DEC 30r 1982 97 0+2531 Or0118 19 APR lr 1983 92 0..188 Oi0077 19 JUl lt 1983 9a Oo2584 Or0219 SEP 30r 1983 91 0 i 2524 Or0444 19 DEC 29r 1983 90 0.2434 Or0157 20 JUH 30r 1978 91 0.2819 Or0495 20 SEP 29t 1978 90 Or1883 0.0389 20 JAiH 1979 95 Ot3916 0.0585 PO MAR 30r 1979 87 Oo2466 0>0410 20 JUH 29r 1'979 91 0.2643 Oe2107 4-198

Table 4-8.0 (continued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STANDARD STATIOH EHD DATE DAYS (MR/DAY) DEVIATION wp SEF'AN 28r 15'79 91 0+2234 0.0267 2P 2r 1 5'80 95 Or2545 0<0768 70 MAR 28r 1980 86 0+2459 0+0288 2Q MAR 28r 1980 81 Or2346 Oo0349 20 JUH 27r 1980 91 0.3135 0. 05'84 20 SEF 26r '1980 5'1 0.2701 Ori451 lp SEP 26r 1980 91 Oo1566 0+0125 20 DEC 311 1 5'80 96 0,25 51 Oa2239

'0 p DEC 3lr 1980 93 Or2158 0.0066 20 MAR 27t 1 5'81 86 0.3317 "".0 s 1496:

2Q MAR 27r 1981 86 Oi2483 Or0176 20 JUH 26r 1981 91 0.2772 Or0300 2P JUN 26r 1981 91 0.1516 0.0358 20 SEF'EP 25r 1981 91 ~ Oo2670 = Or0210

)0 251 1981 91. 0.218l. 0.0087 20 DEC 31r 1981 97 0+3075 0.0647 2Q 3ir 1981 97 0.1719 0 '180 20 MAR 26r 15'82 85 0. 255'i 0.0242

'1 Q MAR 26r 15'82 85 Oo2241 0.0178 2P JUH 25r 1 5'82 91 0.2117 0.0145 70 SEP 24r 1982 91 Or2222 Oo0086 20 30r 1982 97 0.2543 Or 0159 20 APR 1983 Or2137 Oo0049

%0 JUL '1r 1983 91 Or2592 0.0180 20 SEP 30r 1983 91 Or2481 0.0129 20 DEC 29r 1983 90 0.2386 '0.0100 MAR 281 1980 81- 0.2778 Or0428 1 SEP 26r 1980 0.2005 Oo0145 21 DEC 31r 1980 93 Or2473 Oo0112 21 MAR 27r 1981 '86 Or2544 Oo0347 21 SL.P 24r 1982 91 Oe2102 0+0113 21 DEC 30r 1982 97 Or2349 0.0069 21 APR 1r 1983 92 0.2142 0.0629 21 JUL ir 1983 91 0 351 0.0143 21 SEP 30r 1983 91 Or2388 Oe0104

'21 DEC 30r 1983 91 Or2304 Or0623

'UN 30r 1978 91 0. 2565'r2028 0.0607 SEP 29r 1978 5'0 Or0340 '.

JAH 21 1979 5'5 Oi3026 035'7 22 MAR 30r 1979 87 Or2178 Or0097 JUH 29r 15'79 91 Or2005 0. 035'9 22 SEP 28r 1979 91 Oi2132 0 '15'4 JAN 2r 1980 95 Oo3450 0+2028 22 MAR 28r 1980 86 Oo2427 Oopi52 MAR 28r 1980 81 0+2407 0+0428 4-199

TabIe 4-8.0 (continued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STANDARD STATION EHD DATE DAYS (MR/DAY> DEUIATION JUH 27r 1980 91 0+3462 Or3133 22 SEF'EP 26r 1980 91 0,258- Or0856 26r 1980 91 Or2343 Or0270 22 DEC 31r 1980 96 0+3010 Or1237 22 DEC 31 r. 1980 93 Oi2222 0+0195 MAR 27 r 1981 86 Oo2230 0'i 3706 22 MAR 27r 1981 86 0+2433 0.0150 22 JUH 26.r 1981 91 0.2690 Or0307 22 JUH 26r 1981 91 0+1574 '0+0516 g .l SEP 25r 1981 91 Or2602 0.0457 SEP 25r 1981 91 Or2153 0.0074 2P DEC 31r 1981 97 Oo3186 0.0685 DEC 31r 1981 97 Ori978 0.0142 22 MAR 26r 1982 85 Oe2659 0.0350 S s MAR 26r 1'982 85 0.2291 Oi0095.

JUN 25r 1982 91 Or2275 0.0123 SEP 24r 1982 91 0.~>5~ . 0.0107 DEC 30r 1982 97 Or2557 0.0252 APR 1r 1983 92 Or2145 Oi0070 22 JUL 1r 1983 91 Oi2525 0+0303 SEP 30r 1983 91 Oi2628 0+0738 22 DEC 30r 1'983 91 0+2444 0.0187

'23 MAR 28r 1980 81 Oo2500 Oo0370 23 SEP 26r 1980 0<1478 Oo0236 23 "

DEC 3ir 1980 93 0+2043 0.0134 23 MAR 27r 1981 86 Oi2996 0.0736 23 SEP 24r 1982 91 Oi2219 0.0177 A3 DEC 30r 1982 97 0.2532 Oi0140 23 APR 1r 1983 92 0.2163 Oo0025 23 JUL ir 1983 91 Or2559 Oo0270 23 SEP 30r 1983 91 0 '437 0.0132 23 DEC 29r 1983 90 Or2347 0 r 0162 14 JUH 30r 1978 91 0 i 2379 0.0652 24 SEP 29.r '1978 90 0oa969 Or0131 24 JAH 21 1979 95 0.3237 Or0705 24 MAR 30r 1979 87 Oi2075 Or0158 JUH:29 r 1979 91 Or 1992 Oo0160 24 SEP,'8r 1979 91 0.2126 0>0460 JAN 2r 1980 95 Oi2324 Oo0273 28r 1980 86 Or2320 Oi0663 MA'R.28r 1980 81 0.2438 Or0370 24 JUH 27r 1980 91 Or3055 0.1266 24:SEP 26r 1980 91 0.3124 Ori745 24 'EF'4 26r 1980 91 Oo2404 Oo0586

~

DEC 3ir 1980 96 0.3156 oia216 4-200

Tab1e 4-8.0 (continued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELAF'SED DOSE RATE STANDARD STATION EHD DATE DAYS < MR/DAY) DEVIATION 24 DEC 31'r 1980 93 0+2168 Ot0062 24 MAR 27r 1981 86 0.3517 0.0905 MAR 27r 1981 86 0.2411 0.0110 24 JUH 26t 1981 91 Oo2753 Oi0428 24 JUH 26r 1981 91 0.4338 Or3'908 24 SEP 25 19sa 91 Or2486 0.0227 24 SEP '5t 1981 91 Or2002 0+0153 24 DEC 31r 1981 97 Ot2938 Oo0231 24 DEC 31t 1981 97 0+1490 0>0454 24 MAR 26r 1982 85 0.2615 ot0416 24 MAR 26t 1982 85 Ot2635 0.0285 4 JUH 25t 1982 91 oo2251 oooaaa SEP 24r 1982 91 Ot2270 0.0103 24 DEC 30t 1982 97 Oo2546 0.0087 24 APR ar 1983 92 0+2267 o,oa45 24 JUL it 1983 91 0.2540 0.2403 Oooi95 24 SEP 30r 1983 91 Oe0322 DEC 29t 1983 90 Or2349 0.0220 JUH 30r 1978 91 Oo2720 0+0467 25 SEP 29r 1978 90 0.1844 0.0828 g JAil 2 t 1979 95 oo3316 Or0810 C'5 MAR 30r 1979 87 0.2193 Or0279 JUH 29t 1979 91 Ot2140 Oo0470 25 SEP 28r 1979 91 Ot2049 Oo0534 Q

C JA(3 7 r 1980 95 0+2939 0.0728 MAR 28r 1980 86 Oo2570 0 '195 MAR 28r 1980 81 0.2438 0 l 0509 JUN 27r 1980 91 Ot2986 Qoa589 C'

SEP 26r 1980 91 0.2821 0.0440 C

SEP 26r 1980 91 Ot2478 Oo0171 25 DEC 31r 1980 96 Oo4276 Ot 1916 25 DEC 31t 1980 93 Or2158 oioa43 Q5 MAR 27 t 1981 86 Ot3738 0.4410 25 MAR 27t 1981 86 Oo2669 oi0177

+5 JUN 26r 1981 91 Oo3437 Or0597 25 JUN 26r 1981 9a Ot2414 Oo2206 25 SEP 1981 91 Or2805 0.0244 25 SEP 25t 1981 91 Oi2332 0 i 0101 25 DEC 31t 1981 97 Oi3286 Or0339 25 DEC 31t 1981 97 Oi2105 Oo0436 g C' MAR 26r 1982 85 Oo2474 0+0212 MAR 26r 1982 85 Ot2818 Oi0172 C'5 JUH 25r 1982 91 Or2364 0 l 0174 SEP 24r 1982 91 Ot2379 oioa40 DEC 30r 1982 97 Oo2688 oioaa3 AF'R ir 1983 92 Oo2277 Oi0068 4-201

Tab1e 4-8.0 (continued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STAHDARD STATIOH EHD DATE DAYS (HR/DAY) DEUIATION g C'5 JUL 11 1983 91 Oi2749 0.0148 SEP 301 1983 91 oo2644 oioa51

~ 5 DEC 29'1 1983 90 0+2469 Oioi43 40 JUH 251 1982 91 Oo2046 oeoa89 40 SEP 241 1982 91 Oo2082 0 i 0131 40 DEC 301 1982 97 Oo2253 Oioa24 40 APR 11 1983 92 0+1902 0+0042 40 JUL 11 1983 91 0>2340 oooa50 40 SEP 301 1983 91 0.23'93 oooa82 40 301 1983 .Oo2273 Oi0135 41 JUH 251 J. 982 91 HS 41 SEP 241 1982 91 oi245a 0.0152 41 DEC 301 1982 97 Oo2693 0.0183 41 APR 1983 0.2200 Oo0058 41 JUL 11 1983 91 0.2782 0 i 0165 41 SEP 301 1983 91 0.2739 O.O177 DEC 301 1983 0.2660 Oo0221 42 JUH 251 1982 91 0+2355 Oooi81 42 SEP 241 1982 91 0+2312 Oioi07 42 ~ DEC 301 1982 97 "Oo2630 0.0116 APR 11 1983 92 0.2220 Oo0043 42 JUL 1983 91 Oo2647 Oooa92 SEP 301 1983 91 0.~586 oi0611 42 .DEC 301 1983 HS 4~ JUH 251 1982 ". 91 0+2251 0 i 0074 43 'SEP 241 1982'982 91 Oi2365 0.0122 43 DEC 301 97 Oi2627 ', 0+.0062 43 APR 11 1983 92 HS 43 JUL 1983 91 0+2740 0+0229 43 SEP $ 01 1983 91 0.2668 Oi0365 43 DEC 301 1983 91 Oi2524 0+0068 44 JUH 25 1 1982 91 0 i 2153 0.0191 44 SEP 241 1982 91 Oi2195 Oo0126 44 DEC 301 1982 97 0.2441 oooaa7 44 APR ir 1983 92 0.2137 Oi0061 44 JUL 11 1983 91 Oi2547 0.0200 SEP 301 1983 91 0+2434 0+0267 44 DEC 301 1983 91 Oo2371 0.0215 45 JUH 251 1982 91 Oo2149 oioa49 45 SEP 241 1982 91 0 ~~54 Oo0144 45 DEC 301 1982 97 0.2452 0+0115 45 APR 11 1983 92 Oo2181 Oi0057 4-202

Table 4-8.0 (continued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STANDARD STATION EHD DATE DAYS (MR/DAY> DEU IATION 45 JUL it 1983 91 0+2537 0+0209 45 SEP 30t 1983 91 Oi2433 Oo0705 45 DEC 30t 1983 91 Oi2327 0.0210 46 JUN 25 t 1982 91 HS 46 =

SEP '74 t 1982 91 NS 46 DEC 30t 1982 97 0'2896 pi 0070 46 APR it 1.

1983 1983 92 Oi2465 Oi3011 Oo0064'>0246 46 JUL 91 46 SEP 30t 1983 91 0 i 3071 Oi0230 46 DEC 30t 1983 91 Oo2824 Oo0240 47 APR it 1983 92 0.1932 0.0036 47 JUL it 1983 91 Oo2294 0 i 0220 0.0133 47 SEP 30t 1983 91 Oe2292 47 DEC 30r 1983 91 Oo2191 Oo0261 DEC 29 t 1983 0.2391 Oo0301 50 DEC 29t 1983 90 0~2223 0.0164 51 JUH 30t 1978 91 pi 2385 Oi0754 51 SEP 29t 1978 90 0 i 1986 Oo0331 51 JAN 2t 1979 95 Oo2879 0 i 0548 51 MAR 30.t 1979 87 0.1977 Oi0301 51 JUH 29t 1979 91'1 0.1901 0+0348 51 SEP 28t 1979 0.2044 Oo0433 51 JAH 2t 1980 95 0.2671 0.04r 1 51 MAR 28t 1980 86 Oo2488 0,0163 51.-- JUN 27 t 1980 91 Oo2810 Ot1565'.0206 51 SEP 26t 1980 91 0)2206 51 DEC 31 t 1980 96 Oo3599 Oo1878 51 MAR 27 t 1981 . 86 Oo2515 0.0768 51 JUN 26t 1981 91 Oo2571 0 '564 51 JUN 26r 1981 91 Oui'755 Oi0073 51 SEP 25t 1981 91 0+2755 piii91 51 SEP 25t 1981 91 0.2083 0 i 0147 51 DEC 31t 1981 97 Oi3067 Oepihh 51 DEC 31 t 1981 '97 Oiihi4 Oo0578 51 MAR 26t 1982 85 0.2'415 Oipi35 51 MAR 26t 1982 85 Oo2147 Oi0071 51 JUH 25t 1982 91 Oi2235 Oi0405 51 DEC 29t 1983 90 Oi2334 Oo0140 DEC 30t 1983 91 0+2730 Oi0392 4-203

Table 4-8.0 (continued)

QUARTERLY TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STAHDARD STATIOH EHD GATE DAYS <MR/GAY> DFVIATIOH DEC 30r 1983 Oo2602 Oi0234 DEC 29) 1983 90 0.2257 0)0171 DEC 29) 1983 0. Oi0204 2375'.2473 5'1 ~

JUH 30r 1978 91 Oi0496 91 SEP 29r 1978 5'0 0)~~4~ 0.0441 91 JAH 15'79 95 0+2821 oo0317 91 MAR 30) 1979 87 Oo2333 0)0417 91 JUH 29r 15'79 91 Ooi775 Oo0469 5'1 SEP 28) 1979 91 0.1959 0>0263 91 JAH 7 1 5'80 95 Oi2637 0)0585 5'1 MAR 28) 1980 86 0 '2451 0.0753 JUH 27) 1980 91 Oo3602 "

=0. 237-7 91 SEP 26) 15'80 91 0.3140 0)1972 5a GEC 31r 1980 96 0.3083 0. 05'01 91 MAR 27r 1981 86 Oo3558 0.2442 91 JUH 26) 15'81 91 0>3187 0>0595 91 JUiH 26) 1981 91 o,a758 ~

Oi 0095 91 'SEP 25) 1981 91 0.2676 0.0343 5'1 SEP 25) 1'981 91 0 i 2216 Oo0075 5'1 DEC 31r 1981 97 Oi3309 0+0309 91 DEC 31r 15'81 97. oia755 Oi0096 5'1 MAR 26) 1982 85 0.2732 Oo0460 5'1 MAR 26r 1982 85 0.2362 0.0127 91 JUH 25) 1982 5'1 0.2146 oo0120 S JUL 1983 91 0)2495 0.0155'.0482 S SEP 30r 1983 91 0)2497 S DEC 29) 1983 90 0)2234 0.0275 S JUL ir 1983 91 Oo2575 Oo0044 S SEP 30r 1983 91 Oo2510 0)0159 S DEC 29r 1983 90 Oi2399 Oo0386 S JUL 1) 1983 91 0 i 2283 0+0322 S SEP 30) 1983 91 0)2393 Oioa52 S DEC 29r 1983 90 oo2163 0.0207 S JUL 1983 91 0)2649 0.0145 S SEP 30) 1983 91 Oi2686 0 '302 S DEC 29r 1983 90 0.2561 Oo0433 S JUL 1) 1983 91 Oo2389 0.0342 S SEP 30) 1983 '9 l 0.2236 0)0188 4-204

Table 4-0.0 (continued)

QUARTERI Y TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STAHDARD STQTIOH EHD DATE DAYS (HR/DAY> DEVIATIOH DEC 29r 1983 0+2116 Oo0089 S JUL f~ 1983 91 0,2516 0<0239 S SEP 30r 1983 91 0~2401 o.oa84 S DEC 29~ 1983. 90 Oo2341 0.02>~

S 7 JUL ir 1'983 91 0+2525 0.0154 S 7 SEP $ 0~ 1983 91 Ot2575 0>0218 S 7 DEC 29r 1983 90 Oi2377 0 i 0144 S 8 JUL a~ 1983 91 Oi2571 Oiof66 S 8 SEP 30~ '1983 91 Oi2427 0.0174 S 8 DEC 29'~

1983 90 Oi2425 o.o39a S 9 .JUL 1983 91 Oo2617 Oooa74 S 9 SEP 30~ 1983 91 Oo2514 Oo0301 S' DEC 29~ 1983 90 Oo2452 0+0774 10 JUL f~ 1983 91 0>2501 0.0170 10 SEP 30r 1983 91 ,Oi2448 Oi0246 S 10 DEC 29~ 1983 9'0 Oo2345 Oi0282 S if JUI 1~ 1983 91 0 i 2584 0.0153 S 11 SEP 30'983 91 0+2499 Oi0208 S 11 DEC 29'983 90 Oi2217 Oi0617 S f .7 JUL 1983 91 0.2696 0>0269 S 12 SEP 30r 1983 91 0 i 2604 0.0219 S f2 DEC 29~ 1983 90 Oo24i2 0.0367 S 13 JUL fr 1983 91 0+26i6 Oi 0303 S 13 SEP 30'983 91 Oi2533 0+0152 S 13 DEC 29~ 1983 90 0.2382 Oiof20 S 14 JUL 1 ~ 1983 91 Oi2520 0.0354 S SEP 30'9~

1983 91 0+2484 Ooof89 14'5 S DEC 1983 90 Oi2326 Oo.0296 S JUL i~ 1983 91 Oi2666 Oi 0318 S 15 SEP 30~ 1983 91 Oo2655 oooa32 S 15 DEC 29~ 1983 90 Oi2387 'o0259 S a6 JUL 1983 91 Oo2439 0 i 0157 S 16 SEP 30r 1983 91 Oi2573 0+Oi28 S 16 DEC 29~ 1983 90 Oi2455 Oe0414 4-205

o ~ Wmi 'S Tab1e 4-8.1 OTHER TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STANDARD STATION EHD DATE DAYS (MR/DAY) DEVIATIOH 1 JAH 2r 1979 307 0+1941 0.0209 1 JAH 2t 1980 365 Oi2336 0.0185 1 DEC 31r 1981 364 Or2393 0.0205 30r 1981 368 Or3533 0.0968 1 DEC 3lr 1981 377 0+2309 0.0564 MAR 26r 1982 364 Or1988 0 i 0138 1 APR ir 1983 371 0.2339 0.0096 1 30r 1983 273 0.2702 Oo0370 JAH r 1979 307 0.2340 0 i 0870 JAH 7 1980 365 0.2424 0.0292 DEC 31r 1981 364 0.2544 0.0682 MAR 30t 1981 368 0 >145 0.0435 2 DEC 3'1 1 1981 377 0.2364 0.0397 2 MAR 26r 1'982 364 0 '896 0 0175 2 APR ir 1983 371. 0 i 2286 0+0132 DEC 29t 1983 272 0.2316 Oo0147'i0960 3 JAH 2t 1979 307 Oi2115 3 JAH 2t 1980 365 Oi2338 Or0099 3 DEC 3ir 1981 364 Os2275 Os0590 3 30r 1981 368 0 i 1928 Oi0945 3 DEC 31t 1981 377 0 i 2293 0.0337 MAR 26r 1982 364 0 i 1843 0.0107 3 APR lr 1983 371 0 '245 0 i 0103 DEC 29r 1983 272 0 '349 0 ~ 0178 JAH 2r 1979 307 0.1620 0.0407 JAH 2t 1980. 365 0 i 2425 0 i 0498 DEC 3lr 198 1' 364 0 ~557 Osii40 MAR 30r 98.1 368 0.1148 0 i 0132 3it ~ .

DEC 1981 377 0.2158 0 r 0381 MAR 26r 1982 364 0.1710 0 ~ 0104 APR 1983 371 0.2040 0.0100 DEC 30r $ 983 27 0 i 2755 0i0570 C JAH 2 r:'1979 307 0 i 3055 0 i 1824 5 JAH 2r;"1980 365 0.2218 0 i0109 C DEC 3 l. t', 1981 364 0 i 2598 0+1493 MAR 3,0'r. 1981 368 Oo2137 Oi0105 DEC 3i r 1981 377 0+2521 0.0444 5 MAR 26r 1982 364 0.1808 Oo0097 C'

APR '1 r 1983'983 371 0.2227 0.0063 DEC 30 273 Or2565 Or0116 6 J'AH .l r 1979 307 0.1729 0.0320 6 -.JAH 2r 1980 365 0.2190 0.0183

Table 4-8.1 (continued)

OTHER TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STANDARD STATION EHD DATE DAYS (MR/DAY> DEUIATION 6 DEC 31~ 1931 364 0.2196 0.0651 6 MAR 30~ 1981 ".68 Oo2099 Oo0216 6 DEC 31~ 1981 377 Oo2085 o,o22a 6 MAR 26~ 1982 364 Oi1776 0 '175 6 APR 1~ 1983 371 Oo2186 Oioioa 6 DEC 29~ 1983 272 0.2300 0.0087 7 JAN 1979 307 Oi2267 0.0911 7 JAN 1980 365 Oi2473 0.1290 7 DEC 31~ 1981 364 Oi2469 Oiiiol 7 MAR 30~ 1981 368 0 i 2251 0 i 0102 7 DEC 31~ 1981 377 Oi2253 Oi 0408 7 MAR 26~ 1982 364 0 '986 0 i 0131 7 APR 1~ 1983 371 Oi2309 Oi0117 7 DEC 29~ 1983 272 0.2373 Oo0072 8 JAH .7

) 1979 307 0>3107 0 i 0787 8 JAH 2~ 1980 365 0)2677 0 i 0060 8 DEC 3iz 198-1 364 0i2679 0.0216 8 MAR 30~ 1981 368 0 '089 Oo0573 8 DEC 31~ 1981 377 0.2513 0+0374 8 MAR 26~ 1982 364 Oo2159 Oooii7 8 APR ir 1983 371 0.2592 0 i 0175 8 DEC 30~ 1983 273 Oi2702 ~ .0 o 0099 JAH 2~ 1979 307 0.2404 0.0451 JAH 2~ 1980 365 Oo2122 Oo0218 9 DEC 31~ 1981 364 0.2481 0.0075 MAR 30~ 1981 368 0.2196 0.0135 9 DEC 31r 1981 377'64 Oi2108 0.0179 9 MAR 26~ 1982 0 i 1775 0.0142 9 APR 1~ 1983 371 0.2137 0 i 0103

'? IEC 30~ 1983 Oo2235 0 i 0134 10 JAH a t 1979 307 0 i 2312 Oi0403 10 JAH 27 1980 365 0 i 2358 0 i 1708

'10 DEC 31 1981 364 0 '309 Op0343 10 MAR '0~

1981 368 0i2775 Oo2212 10 DEC 3ir 1981 377 0 '167 Oi0543 10 MAR 26~ 1982 364 Oi1939 Oooihh 10 APR ir 1983 371 .Oi2247 Oi0051 10 DEC 29~ 1983 272 0.2376 Oi0143 11 JAH 2f 1979 307 Oe2486 0(0575 11 JAH 2t 1980 365 Oo2901 0 i 1047 11 DEC 31r 1981 364 0.2170 0.0740 ii MAR 30~ 1981 368 0.1730 Oo0157 4-207

Tab1e 4-8.1 (continued)

OTHER TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STANDARD STATION. EiHD DATE DAYS <MR/DAY) DEVIATION 11 DEC 31 r 1981 377 0.2200 0+0338 ii ll .

MAR APR 26t 1'982 1983 364 371 0.1941 0 '275

'0 '074 0.0029" 11 DEC 29t 1983 272 0 i 2418 0.0131 12 JAiH 2 r 1979 '307 Oo3155 0.0794 JAH 2t 19'80 365 Oo2646 0.0236 12 DEC 31 t 1981 364 0.2478 Oi0313 12 30t "1981 368 0 i 2117 0.0294 12 DEC 31t 1981 HS

'77 12 MAR 26r 1982 364 Oo2092 0.0091 12 A

APR it 1983 371 0.2528 Orpi32 1 1983 27 2 Oc2580 Oo0122 13 JAil 1979 307 0+2199 0.0327 13 JAN <<t 1980 365 0 ~5') 5 0.0306

'l3 DFC 31 r 1931 344 Or2704 0>0799 13 MAR 30r 1981 368 0 0%300 0.0514 13 DEC 3lt 1981 377 Oi2103 0+0413 13 MAR 26t 1982 364 Or1933 0+0127 13 APR lr 1983 371 0+2340 Or0127 13 DEC.29r 1983 272 Ot2411 0+0046 14 JAN 1979 307 0 i 2437 0 '533 14 JAH 1980 365 0 i2459 Oiplhi 14 DEC 31t 1981 364 9 o 9999 '9 o 9999 MAR 30t 1981 368 0 i 2261 0 '270 14 DEC 31r 1981 377 Ool944 0.0709 14 MAR 26t .1 982 344 0. o 1913 0-o 0122 14 APR 1983 371 0.2315 0'. 0163 29r i983 272 Or2363 Oopi40 15

" JAN 2t 1979 307 Oi2293 0.0546 15 JAH 1980 365 0)2523 Oo0085 15 DEC 3it 1981 364 Or2223 Oo0604 15 MAR 30r 1981 368 Oo2060 0>0077 15 DEC 3lr 1981 377 Oo2210 0+0512 15 MAR 26t 1982 ~

364 0.2036 Or0105 15 APR 1983 371 HS 15 DEC 29r 1983 272 0.2598 0 i 0084 16 JAN 21 1979 307 0+1958 0.0574 ih JAH 1980 365 0.2502 Oopi87 16 DEC 31t 1981 364 Or2364 0.0513 16 MAR 30r 1981 368 0 i 2247 0.0272 16 ocr 31 t 1981 377 0 i 2005 Oo0605 16 MAR 26r 1982 364 Oi2019 0.0221 4-208

Tab1e 4-8.1 (continued)

OTHER TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STANDARD

~" STATION EHD DATE DAYS (MR/DAY) DEVIATION 16 APR it 1983 371 0.2455 0+0142 16 DEC 29t 1 '983 272 0.2516 0.0163 I

17 JAN a t 1979 307 0.1891 0.0901 17 JAN 2t 1980 365 "

Ot2618 0.0160 17 DEC 31t 1981 364 0 ~563 0.0439 17 MAR 30t 1981 368 0.2077 Ot0278 17 DEC 31r 1981 377 0+2420 0+0758 17 MAR 26t 1982 364 0 i 1981 0 iooss 17 APR lt 1983 371 Ot2345 0+0085 17 DEC 29t 1 '983 27~ 0 i 2506 O.OO81 18 JAil ') t 1979 'T Q7 0.2232 0.0268 18 JAN 1980 365 Qt2476 0 '297 18 DEC 31r 1981 364 0 i 2651 ot0514 18 MAR 30t 1981 3'68 0 i 2878 0.0823 18 DEC 31t 1'981 377 Oi2535 0.0156 18 MAR 26t 1982 364 0 i 1946 0.0209 18 APR lt 1983 371 Ot2370 0.0105 18 DEC 29t 1983 272 0 i 2675 0 i 0172 19 JAN 1979 307 0 i221 a 0 i 1087 19 JAH ~ t 1980 365 Ot2707 Oo0307 1'9 . DEC 31t 1981 364 0.2581 0 0571 19 MAR 30t 1981 368 0.2327 0.0549 3ar 1981 377 Oi2115 0. 0199 19 MAR 26t 1 982 364 po1964 .0 o 0076 19 APR it 1983 371 0.2346 0.0088 19 DEC 30t 1983 273 HS HS 2P JAH 21 1979 307 0+1978 0+0453 20 JAH 1980 3'65 0 i 2243 Ot0334 2Q DEC 31t 1981 364 Ot2729 0 i 0370 20 MAR 30t 1981 368 Ot2051 Ot0357

.)

p DEC 31t 1981 377 0 i 2354 0 i 0940 2Q MAR 26t 1982 364 0 '958 0 i 0127 20 APR it 1983 371 Ot2340 0.0114

'277 20 IEC 29t 1983 272 0 i 2467 0 2P DEC 30r 1983 273 Ot2294 0.0134 21 APR it 1983 371 0.2184 O.O115 2] DEC 30t 1983 273 0.2308 0 i 0123 22 JAN 1979 307 0.2568 Ot0821 i JAH 2r 1980 365 Ot3096 0+1514 22 DEC 31t 1981 364 0 ~50~ 0.0133 MAR 30t 1981 368 0+1906 0>0094

Table 4-0.1 (continued) .

OTHER TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE ST*HDARD STATIOH EiH 0 DATE DAYS (MR/DAY) DEVIATIOH DEC 3lr 1981 377 Oi2195 0.0588 g ".l MAR 26r 1982 364 0 i 1946 0.0135 APR lr 1983 37a 0 i 2323 0+0098 29 DEC 29r 1983 272 0.2413 0.0027 APR 1 r 1983 371 0 i 2289 oi0113 DEC 29 r 1'983 272 Oo2386 Oi0065 24 JAH 2r 1979 307 0+2524 0+1511 JAH 27 1980 365 0 655 Oo0678 24 DEC 3ir 1981 364 Oi2611 0+0401 24 MAR 30r 1981 368 Oo0792 0.0278 24 DEC 31 t 1981 377 0 i 2359 0.0405 24 MAR 26 r. 1982 364 0ei964 Oo0100 API>> ar 1983 371 Oi2336 0.0i03 24 DEC 29r 1983 272 0.2410 0 '193 s 4 JAil 2r 1979 307 0.2625 0.0791 25 JAH 2r '9.80 365 0.2655 Oi9678 DEC 31r 1981 364 0 i3018 Oi0448 25 MAR 30r 1981 368 HS HS g C'5 DEC 31 r 1981 377 0.2332 0.0396 MAR 26r 198~ 364 0 i2174 0.0396 A5 t)

APR ir 1983 371 0 i 2481 0.0142 C'0 DEC 29r 1983 272 0,26a3 0.0148 1983 371 0.2097 0.0099 APR 17 1983 371 HS HS DEC 30r 1983 273 0.2635 0.0154 APR a) 1983 371 0.2351 oo0158 DEC 30r 1983 273 HS HS DEC 30r 1983 273 oi2417 0.0222 APR 1983 371 0.2287 0.0126 DEC 30r 1983 273 Oo2453 Oe0309 ar 1983 371 0.2261 0.0145 30r 1983 273 0 i2360 Oo0212 46 APR ar 1983 371 0.2806 0ioa15 46 DEC 30r 1983 273 0 i 2946 0.0086 30r 1983 273 Oo2204 oo0321 4-210

Tab1e 4-8.1 (continued)

OTHER TLD ELAPSED DOSE RATE STAHDARD STATIOH EHD DATE D A't'S (HR/DAY) DE<J I AT I OH 51 JAH 2>> 1979 307 oi3493 0.1874 51 JAH 2>> 1980 365 0,0139 51 DEC 31>> 1981 364 0.2854 0 i 0457 51 MAR 30>> 1981 368 0,2075 0.0224 51 DEC 31>> 1981 377 0+2324 Oi0275 51 HAR 26>> 1982 364 0.1905 O.O124 91 JAH 2>> 1979 307 0>>2761 0.1110 91 JAH 2>> 1980 365 0.2434 oo0145 91 DEC 31>> 1981 364 0,2635 Oi0554 91 MAR 30>> 1981 368 ooa997 0.0180 91 DEC 31>> 1981 377 0.2141 0.0497 91 HAR. 26>> 1 982 364 0>1964 0 i 0139 DEC 2'9>> 1983 '17>> 0.2412 0.0242 S 2 DEC 29>> 1983 27'.l 0.2507 0.0190 S 3 . DEC 29>> 1983 272 0.2293 0>0129 DEC 30>> 1983 273 P

$ DEC 29>> 1983 272 0.2365 0.0106 S 6 'DEC 29>> 1983 272 oo2418 0 i 0200 S 7 DEC 29>> 1983 P7Q 0+2463 Oi0221 S 8 . DEC 29>> 1983 272 0.2464 0.0377 S 9 DEC 29>> 1983 0.2520 0.0131 S 10 DEC 29>> 1983 272 '.2337 oi0506 S 11 DEC 29>> 1983 272 Oi2476 Oo0063 S 12 DEC 29>> 1983 272 Oe2460 0.0287 S 13 DEC 29>> 1983 272 0+2496 0.0216 S 14 DEC 29>> 1983 0.2303 Oi0203 S 15 DEC 29>> 1983 272 0.2572 0+0145 S 16 DEC 29>> 1983 0.2401 0.0150 4-211

C 4 'at. 4 ~WJa2~ " Zy):4~iL JiQ"ru ii~P. XPÃ4~Vc,44+~r':.~ " 'ddij '~ ' .4'4 .e>> e, ~ w.~ w ~ ' 4 0'1 1

II

.l V

<<l

.J 1

t p

l Oj 1

I

.J

5.0 QUALITY CONTROL A number of steps are involved in establishing a viable environmental surveillance program that ensures that the data obtained is representa-tive of actual concentration in the environment. First, sufficient data must be obtained to establish a definative base of historical data for each sample location and each media. Secondly, sample collection must be directed by well-established, approved procedures to assure that consis-tent sampling methods are used at all locations for a given media to minimize the effects of bias inherent in the sample collection process.

These procedures, in conjunction with a program of analytical quality control, are necessary to maintain and demonstrate the required precision and accuracy for evaluation of environment impacts.

Section 5.1 contains quality control data, extracted from the various monthly and annual analytical reports provided by the Eberline labora-tories. Section 5.2 contains the 1983 NUS Quality Control Report.

Section 5.3 summarizes the quality control process for U.S. Testing's dosimetric service. Section 5.4 represents the quality control program for environmental dosimeters in the Supply System's dosimeter laboratory.

The Washington State Radiation Control Section, in support of the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, has established an auditing program invoIving the analysis of split or replicate samples from the Supply Systems sam'pling program. This state program provides an additional quality control check for the Supply System's REAP. Results of the state's analyses are compared with reported Supply System analyses and reported annually in the "Environmental Radiation Program Annual Report".

5.1 Eberline Laborator Anal tical Sam le Quality Control Fiv'e (5) types of samples are analyzed by the laboratory for pur-poses of analytical quality control. These samples are 1) blanks,

2) spikes, 3) standards, 4) intercalibration or intercomparison, and 5) splits. A blank, spike or split sample is processed for each ten (10) routine samples of a specific analysis type. Stan-dard samples are processed only as required by procedural calibra-Intercalibration or intercompari son samples are processed 'ions.

as available from the initiating laboratory. All quality control samples are processed in accordance with rqug[ne procedures for analyses of the given sample media matrix.<2~~

The following tables sumnarize by year the quality control sample data reported by Eberline during the tenure of its contract with the Washington Public Power Supply System.

5-1

Y 1

Table 5-1.0 QUALITY I UL - JULY I TU SPLIT SAMPLES Sam le T e ~Ana1 sos Ali uot A Ali uot 8 Units CW Gross8 + 1 5 + 2 pCi/1 Ehi lk I-131 0.5 0.5 pCi/1 Sr-89 10 10 pCi/1 Sr-'90 '2 MW 2 pCi/1 Milk I-131 0.5 C 0.5 pCi/1 Milk I-131 ' 0.5 C 0.5 pCi/1 Milk . I-131 ~

0.5 0.5 'pCi/1 U

IQ SW Gross8 '2 5 + 2 pCi/1 Milk I-131 0.5 0.5 pCi/1 Milk '-131 0.5 C 0.5 PCi/1 LW H-3 1.0 0.1 0.9 + 0.4 pCi/ml WM H-3 17 2 17 + 2 pCi/ml SW Gross 8 7 2 6 + 2 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 51 5 48 5 pCi/ml Mater H-3 150 15 140 + 15 pCi/ml Water Sr-90 54 5 ~

50 + 5 pCi/ml.

Mater H-3 140 14 150 + 15 pCi/ml Mater Sr-90 .04 .02 .04 + .02 pCi/ml Mater. H-3 310 30 310 . + 30 pGi/ml Mater Sr-90 89 9 94 + 9 pCi/ml Mater H-3 245 25 240 + 25 pCi/ml Mater Sr-90 .05 .01 .03 + .01 pCi/m'E Mater H-3 680 70 700 + 70 pCi/ml Water H-3 380 40 380 + 40 pCi/ml Mater Sr-90 .09 .01 .11, + .01 pCi/ml Water H-3 8.6 0.9 8.6 + 0.9 pCi/ml Mater Sr-90 .09 .02 .09 + .02 pCi/ml Mater H-3 445 45 443 . 40 pCi/ml Mater Sr-90 .03 + pCi/ml

+'16

.14 .02 Mater H-3 1160 + 120 1140 + 120 pCi/ml Mater Sr-90 .04 + .01 .05 + .01 pCi/ml Mater H>>3 35 + 35 + 4 pCi/ml Water Sr-90 .02 .02 pCi/ml Mater H-3 750 + 75 745 + 75 pCi/ml Water H-3 3.5 + -0.5. 3.8 + 0.5 pCi/ml 5-2

9 Table 5-1.0 (continued) 9 Oll LIIY OO OL - JIILY IYYY BLANK SAMPLES

'".Sam

'(

le T e ~Ana1 sis Measured Activit Units

.':,OI Mater <] 9 pCi/1

,::AP Gross'r-89

<1 E-06 uCi/fi 1 ter AP Sr-90 <1 E-06 uCi/fi 1 ter

DI Mater Sr -89 pCi/1 ~

', DI DI DI Water Water Mater Sr-90 Sr -89 Sr-90

< 2

<1

< 1 pCi/l pC'/1 pCi/1 DI Water 'I Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 < 1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-89 < 1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 < 1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-89 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 < 1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 < 1 pCi/1 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 <-

.005005 pCi/m3 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 pCi/m3 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 .004 pCi/m3 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 .003 pCi/m3 DI Mater Gross'r

<1 pCi/1 AP -89 < 1 E-06 uCi'/f i 1 ter AP Sr-90 < 1 E-06 uCi/fi lter OI Mater Sr-89 1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 < 1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 < 1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 1 pCi/1

~

DI Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-89 . < 1. pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-90 < 1 pCi/1 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 .01 pCi/m3 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 .01 pCi/m3 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 .004 pCi/m3 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 .004 pCi/m3 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 .002 pCi/m3 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 .01 pCi/m3 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 .005 pCi/m3 5-3

( h h (g 9>> I~ 9 9 'n hp99 ~l 9, V' 1 I

Table 5-1.0

.. (continued.)

OIIALITY OO TOOL - OIILY 999 0'LANK SAMPLES (continued)

Sam le T e ~Anal sis Measured Activit Units g Charcoal Cartridge I-131 .02 pCi/m3 Charcoal Car tr idge I-131 .005 pCi/m3 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 .005 pCi/m3 fj DI Water Gross& pCi/1 OI Water Gross~ ~ 1 pci/1 OI Mater I-131 ~ 0.1 pci/.1 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 .004 pCi/m3 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 .003 pCi/1 OI Water I-131 ~ 0.2 pCi/1 Cha'rcoal Cartridge I-131 .005 pCi/m3 OI Mater Gross~ ~ 1 pCi/1 OI Water I-131 pCi/1 DI Mater. I-131 .

pCi/1 :j SPIKED SAMPLES Sam le T e ~Ana1 sis Known Activit Measured Activit Units Mater Cs-137 18 16+3 pCi/1 Water Cs-137 36 36+4 pCi/1 Water Cs-137 36 37+4 pCi/1

Table 5-1.0 (continued)

UUALITY C UL - AU IIUT LUAU SPLIT SAMPLES Sam le T e ~Anal sis Ali uot A Al i uot 8 Units Vegetation Sr-90 0.5 0.5 pCi/g Mi lk I-131 0.5 0.5 pCi/1 Milk I-131 0.5 0.5 pCi/1 Milk Sr-89 10 10 pCi/1 Mi lk Sr-90 3 + 1 2 + 1 pCi/1 Milk Sr-89 5 5 pCi/1 Mi lk Sr-90 6; + 2 6 + 2 pCi/1 Mi lk I-131 0.5 0.5 pCi/1 Water .. Sr-90 7.1 + 0.7 6.6 + 0.7 pCi/ml Mater Sr-90 5.0 + 0.5 4.9 + 0.5 pCi/ml Water Sr-90 11.0 + 1.1 11.5 + 1.2 pCi/ml Mater Sr-90 24 + 2 22 + 2 pCi/ml Water Sr-90 12 + 1 13 + 1 pCi/ml Water Sr-90 12.5 + 1.3 11.5 + 1.2 pCi/ml Water Sr-90 5.7 + 0.6 4.9 + 0.5 pCi/ml Water Sr-90 5 + 1 4 + 1. pCi/1 WM Gross'ross 3 ~

1 3 + 1 pCi/1 MW a 1 1 pCi/1 Milk 'I-131 0.5 0.5 pCi/1 CW Gross' 3 + 2 3 + 2 pCi/1 Soil Sr-90 .18 +'0

.03 .25 + .03 pCi/g Water Gross a + 3 30 + 3 pCi/1 Mater Cross& 20 ~ + 3 22 + 3 pCi/1 SW B 'ross 5 5 pCi/1 CM Gross ~ + 2 4 + 2 pCi/1 WW H-3 12.4 + 1.2 12.3 + 1.2 pCi/ml SW Gross B 5 5 Pci/1 5-5

Table 5-1.0 (continued)

Ull LITT I L - AUUUUT I TU Oj BLANK SAMPLES Sam le T e ~Anal sos Measured Activit Units OI -Water Sr-90 .02 pCi/ml OI Mater Sr-90 .02 pCi/ml OI Mater Sr-90 .02 pCi/ml OI Mater Sr-90 . .01 pCi/ml OI Mater Gamma Isotopic .02 pCi/ml DI Water 'Gamma Isotopic .02 pCi/ml DI Water Gamma Isotopic .02 pCi/ml OI Mater Gamma Isotopic .02 'Ci/ml DI Water Gamma Isotopic .02'02 pCi/ml DI Water Gamma Isotopic pCi/ml DI Mater I-131 <1 pCi/1 OI Mater Gross B <1 pCi/1 DI Water I-131 < 0.5 pCi/1 DI Mater Gross B <<2 pCi/1 OI Mater Gross B <2 pCi/1 OI Mater Gross B <2 pCi/1 SPIKED SAMPLES Sam le T e ~A1 I ~KA Measured Activit Units Water Cs-137 ~ 33 28 + 10 pCi/Sample Water Cs-137 33 24 + 9 pCi/Sample Water Cs-137 33 26 + 9 pCi/Sample Mater H-3 ~

2.4 2.3 + 0.2 pCi/ml Mi lk I-131 330 320 + 10 dpm/Sample Mi lk 1-131 70 + 7 77 + 8 'pm/Sample Milk I-131 68 + 7 61 + 6 dpm/Sample 5-6 Oj

Table 5-1.0 (continued)

{ LI Y CONT 0 - RPTE ER 1978 SPLIT SAMPLES Sam le T e ~Ana1 sis Ali uot A Ali uot B Units CW Gross 8 + 2 6 + 2 pCi/1 CW Gross 0 5 5 pCi/1 Milk I-131 0.5 0.5 pCi/1 SW Gross ~ 5 5 pCi/1 Milk . '"--'I-131 0.5 0.5 pCi/1 CW Gross 8 2 2 pCi/1

, Water Gross 8 + 2 2 + 2 pCi/1 Water Gross a 7 7 pCi/1 0.5 2.1 + 0.6 pCi/g Soil Soil Cs-137 Cs-137 .: .'22.52 +

+ 0.6 2.2 + 0.6 pCi/g Soil Cs-137 '.0 + 0.2 .1.3 + '.5 pCi/g Water Gross 8 2 + 2 2 + 2 pCi/1 Water Gross a .1 1 pCi/1 Aquatic Biota Sr-89 .025 .025 pCi/g Aquatic Biota Sr-90 0.19 + .02 0.27 + .03 pCi/9 Animal Sr-89 .01 .02 pCi/g Animal Sr-90 .01 .02 pCi/g Milk Sr'-89 5 5 pCi/l Milk Sr-90 + 1 5 + 2 pCi/1 Silt 'r-89

.025 .025 pCi/g Silt Sr-90 .01 .01 pCi/g Vegetation Sr-90 < '.5 0.5 PCi/9 Mi lk Sr-89 5 5 pCi/1 Mi lk Sr-90 13 + 13 + 2 pCi/1 Mi lk Sr-89 5 5 pCi/1 Milk Sr-90 + 2 4 + pCi/1 Water Gross B 3

1 + 1 2 +'1 3 pCi/1 Milk I-131 0.5 0.5 pCi/1 LW CS-137 <. 10 10 pCi/1 5-7 I I '0' g 1 (I s a 1'I a a a 'a t I = ~

~ 1

' s: "~'4. 'ss'iR RO' aa w~tss4~ ' 'sE ~ tit R R~~ ~~wls~k ~RRR '4'~ E" "', s'Rstt %4m'~ J'44'Ql)" 'E'R'saR R44 ~ s ~ ""

. Table 5.-1.0' (continued)

,J E E LIT I L-EETEIIEREIE

, ~

'am BLANK SAMPLES le T e. ~Ana1 sis Measured Activit Units OI Mater Gross 8 <2 pCi/1

, DI Water Gross 8 <2 pCi/l AP Blank Sr-89 <1 E-06 uCi/fi 1 ter i.'i.j AP Blank Sr-90 <1 E-06 uCi/fi 1 ter

'OI Mater Sr-89 <1 E-08 uCi/ml OI Water Sr-90 <1 E-08. uCi/ml OI Mater Sr-89 < 1 'pCi/1  ::I OI Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 OI 'Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr -90 <1 pCi/l DI Water Sr-89 '<1 pCi/1 OI Water Sr-90 <1. pCi%1 .

OI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/l DI Mater Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 R DI Mater Sr-90 <1 pci/1 OI Mater H-3 . <0.1 pCi/ml DI Mater I-131 < 0.1 pCi/1 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 < 0.01 pCi/m3 . 1 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 <.0.01 pCi/m3 Water Sr-89 <2 pCi/1 Water 'r-90

<2 pCi/li I Urine Po-210 ~

<1 pC1/1 Charcoal Cartridge ,I-131 < 0.01 pCi/m3 DI Mater Gross B <1 pCi/1 DI Water I>>131 ( 0.1 pCi/1 OI Water Uranium <2 dpm/1 5-8 E

a i

Table95-1.0 (continued)

RATTY AT I-EETE ERTETE SPIKE 0 SAMPLES Sam le T e ~KII Measured Activit Units Milk I-1.31 39 + 4 44 + dpm/sample DI Mater I-131 38 + 4 39 + 4 dpm/sample DI Water Sr-90 73 77 + dpm/sample DI Mater H-3 2.4 +,0.3,':;.

10'.6 pCi/ml Mater Sr-90 33 +3 38 +

+'l 4 pCi/sample Water Cs-137 53 48 pCi/1 Mater Sr-90 1.6 + 0.2 E+03 + 0.2'+03

'.5 dpm/sample Water Sr-90 1.6 + 0.2 E+03 1.8 + 0.2 '+03 dpm/sample Water Sr-90 1.5 '+ 0.2 E+03 1.5 + 0.2 E+03 dpm/sample Water Sr-90 3.1 + 0.3 E+03 3.4 + 0.3 E+03 dpm/sample 5-9 PA 9 tAt 9 ef9 N 9 ET, "P91V4ffl 9 i~>> 99 4PWWE IWHh .9. A;% RP gut P; 9 ~PP

Table 5-1.0 (continued) g LI ON -OTOER 1918 SPLIT SAMPLES Sam le T e ~Ana1 sis Ali uot A Al i uot B Units Lake Water .. Gross 8 4 . + 2 5 + 2 pCi/1 Lake Water' Gross a 1 1 pCi/l Milk I-131 0.5' 0.5 . pCi/1 Milk =- ~

Sr-89 5 pCi'/1 Mi lk Sr-90 7 + 4 8 + 1 pCi/1 Milk Sr-89 5 4 5 pCi/1 Milk Sr-90 14 + 7 12 + 2 pCi/1 Produce Sr-89 .005 '0.'02 pCi/g Produce Sr-90 0.05 + 0.01 0.05 + 0.03 pCi/9 Soi 1 Sr-90 0.15 0.15 pCi/g Soi 1 Sr-90 0.12 + 0.02 0.16.+ 0.03 - pCi/g So il Sr-90 0.14 + 0.02 0.18 + 0.03 pCi/g Soil Sr-90 0.17 + 0.03 0.20 + 0.04 pCi/g Soi 1 . ~ Sr-90 0.17 + 0.03 0.20 + 0.04 pCi/g Soil Sr-90 0.11 + 0.05 0.08 + 0.05 pCi/g Soil ~

Sr-90 0.15 0.15 pCi/g Soil Sr-90 0.26 + 0.04 - 0.21 + 0.04 pCi/g Soil Sr-90 0.12 + 0.04 0.18 + 0.06 'pCi/g Soil Sr-90 0.26 + 0.04 0.34 + 0.07 PCi/9 Soil Sr-90 0.07 + 0.06 0'.10 + 0.06 pCi/g Water H-3 5.4 + 0.6 6.2 + 0.9 pCi/ml Water H-3 76 + 8 69 + 7 pCi/ml Water H-3 76 8 75 8 pCi/ml Water H-3 12 + 1 11 + 1 pCi/ml Soil Sr -89 0.03 0.01 pci/9 Soil Sr-90 0.03 0.01 pCi/g'Ci/1 Surface Water Gross g 5.2 + 2 5 + 2 Surface Water Gross g 1.7 + 0.7 1.9 '+ 0.8 pCi/1 Milk Sr-89 5 5 pCi/l Milk Sr-90 22 + 2 25 + 3 pCi/1 Rain Water Grosso 3 + 2 2 + 1 pCi/1 Rain Water 1 1 pCi/1 Lake Water Gross'-3 2 ' + 0.2 2.4 + 0.4 pCi/ml Soil Sr-89 0.02 0.01 pCi/g Soil Sr-90 0.03 0.01 pCi/g Milk Sr-89 10 10 pCi/1 Milk Sr-90 3 + 3 + pCi/l 5-10

Table 5-1.0 (continued) sULIY II 0 -OCTOE 178 SPLIT SAMPLES (continued)

Sam le T e ~Ana1 sis Ali aot A Al i uot 8 Units Mater Sr-89 9 E-09 9 E-09 uCi/ml Water SR-90 9 E-09 9 E-09 uCi/ml Mater Gross& 3 + 2 3 + 2 pCi/1 Surface Water Gross' 5 + 3 4 + 3 pCi/1 Mell Water Grosso 40 + 4 45 + 8 pCi/1 Cooling Mater Gross8 5 + 2 5 + 2 pCi/1 Mater H-3 70 + 7 71 + 7 pCi/ml Mater H-3 6.3 + 0.6 6.3 + 0.6 pCi/ml Milk Sr-89 1 2 pc.i/1 Milk 'r-90 13 + 3 9 + 3 pCi/1 Milk Sr-89 1 1 pCi/1 Milk Sr -90 2 + 1 4 + 1 pCi/1 .

5-11

I'( 4 " 1 = a 0 a R Rh 'R 4 Ra Al Table 5-1.0 RIIR ITY CO ROI - OC 0 RR RRTR (continued)

~ I BLANK SAMPLES Sam le T e ~Anal sls Meas'ured Activit Units OI Water <2 pCi/1 DI'ater Gross'ross+

< 1 pCi/1 DI Water I-131 < 0.1 pCi/1 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 < 0.004 pCi/m3 Charcoal Cartridge I-131. < 0.005 pCi/m3 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 < 0.003 pCi/m3 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 < 0.009 pCi/m3 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 < 0.008 pCi/m3 DI Mater Sr-89 < 1 pCi/l OI Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/l DI. Mater" Sr-89 <.1 pCi/l DI Mater Sr-90 < 1 ~ pCi/1 DI Mater Sr.-89 <1 pCi/1 OI Water Sr-90 < 1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 < 1 pCi/1 DI Water DI Water OI Water Sr-90 Sr-89 Sr-90

<1

< 1

< 1 pCi/1 pCi/1 pci/1 Oi OI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-90 < 1 pCi/1 OI Water Sr-89 < 1 pCi/1 OI Mater Sr-90 <1 .

pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 PCi/1 OI Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 OI Mater Sr-89 1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 < 1 pCi/l DI Mater Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 < 1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 OI Mater Sr-89 < 2 E-08 uCi/ml DI Mater Sr-90 < 2 E-08 uCi/ml DI Mater Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/l OI Mater Sr -90 < 1 pCi/1 OI Water Sr-89 < 1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-90 <1 pCi/l

~ '-12

Table 5-1.0 (continued) rll I Y CONT DL - OCTO ER 1 78 BLANK SAMPLES (continued)

Sam le T e ~Anal sis Measured Activit Units Air Filter <2 E-06 uC i/fi 1 ter Air Filter Sr-89'r-90

<2 E-06 uCi/fi 1 ter DI Water Gross B <2 pCi/1 OI Mater Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Water ~

Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1" DI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 OI Mater Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 < 0.005 pCi/m3 DI Mater Gross 8 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Gross 8 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr -89 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-89 <1 E-08 uCi/ml DI Mater Sr-90 <1 E-08 uCi/ml DI Mater Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <] pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 OI Mater Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Water I-131 < 0.2 pCi/1 DI Water I-131 < 0.2 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr -89 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 OI Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 pci/1 DI Mater Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 pCi/1 5-13 Qt t 4... n <<r R<< t<<<<, .~rtt<<<<srtrll0 j nsrArrr <<n, ltr<<<< ~<n)~~ rrt r, I 'rw<<', r, .<<:" ~

'9,~4 9

w648Y ' ~ ' 8 ~ ', a s 8 " ~

' ~l I' ~ e4 88'L Table 5-1.0 (continued)

Q1 CCALIII C L - CC I I 78

'1 BLANK SAMPLES (continued)

Sam le T e ~Aaa1 sis Measured Activit Uni s DI Mater Sr-90 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 Sy]

DI Mater Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 OI Mater Sr-89 pCi/1 OI Mater Sr-90 < 1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 < 1 pCi/1 OI Water Sr-90 pCi/1 OI Water Sr-89 < 1, E-08 uCi/ml OI Mater . Sr-90 E-08 uCi/ml OI Mater Sr-89 pCi/1 OI Mater Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 5-14

Table 5-1.0 (continued) g LLTY CO ROL - OCTO RR TATA SPIKED SAMPLES Sample T e ~A1 i ~KA Measured Activit Units Water Sr-90 1.4, + 0.1 E+03 1. 2 + 0. 1 E+03 dpm/s amp 1 e Water Sr-90 1.4 +: 0.1 E+03 1.5 + 0.2 E+03 dpm/sample Mater Cs-137 53 50 + 10 pCi/1 Mater ', 1.7 + 0.2

'.51.6 + 0.2 E+03 dpm/sample Sr.-90 E+03 DI Mater Sr-90 1.6 + 0.2 E+03 1.6 + 0.2 E+03 dpm/sample DI Water Sr-90 + 0.2 'E+03 1.7 + 0.2 E+03 dpm/sample 5-15

L$

Table 5-1.0 (continued)

Etl LITT 0 T OL - NO EN ER INTR SPLIT SAMPLES Sam le T e ~Ana1 sos Ali uot A Al i vot 8 Units SW Gross B 6 + 3 9 + 3 pCi/t-.

SW Gross B 8 + 3 8 + 3 pCi/1 SM Gross B 3 + 2 4 + 2 pCi/1 SM Gross B ,3 + 3 3 + 2 pCi/1 SW Gross B '4 + 2 8 3 pCi/1 CM Mater Water Gross B Gross B Gross a

'7 8 +

+

2 3

5 6

15

+

+

2 4

5

~ pCi/1 pCi/1 pCi/1 Soil Gross ~ 4 + 1 5 + 2 pCi/9 CM Gross B 5 + 3 5 + 3 pCi/1 AP Sr-89. 0.01 0.01 pCi/m3 AP Sr-90 0.01 0.01 pCi/m3 LW Gross B 8 + 2 5 + 2 pCi/1 Water Gross B ~

3 + 1' 4 + 1 pCi/1 Water Gross B 4 1 5 + 2 pCi/1 Mi lk Sr-89 10 10 pCi/1 Milk Sr-90 + 5 + 2 pCi/1 Milk Sr-89 10 10 pCi/1 Milk 'r-90 10 + 2 12 + 1 pCi/1 Milk Sr-89 10 10 pCi/1 Milk Sr-90 3 + 1 3 + 2 pCi/1 SM Gross B 6 + 2 7 + 2 pCi/1 5-16

Table 5-1.0 (continued)

EORL TY OO TROL 0"ERBER BETE BLANK SAMPLES B'

Sam le T e ~Anal sis Measured Activit . Units Charcoal Cartridge I-131 < 0.01 pCi/m3 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 < 0.003 pCi/m3 DI Mater Sr-89 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-90 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Water- Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-90 < 1 pCi/1 OI Rater Sr-89 < 1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 < 1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 Water

'I Sr-90 p'i/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1' DI Mater Sr-90 pCf/1 DI Mater Sr-89 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 <1 'Ci/1 DI Mater Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 pci/1 DI Mater Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Mater. Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90, <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 OI Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Mater I-131 < 0.1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1

'I Water." Sr-90 1 pCi/1 DI Water, Sr-89 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 pCi/1 OI Mater Sr-89 pci/1 DI Mater Sr-90 < 1 pCi/1 DI Ma'ter Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Rater Sr-90 <1 pCi/1

' DI )Pater Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 I.:Mater Sr-90 < 1 pCi/1 5-17

~<<ST~~ '<<~~<<RR<<n<<ER<<SEErm<<a<<. n.

~..AX~M A'S (.,'~ "~S.IM M.

"'E ~ .' .S'>>:: ':. T~

I ~E ~i ~ ~ ~

Table 5-1..0 (continued)

..I g LOTTO TOL-EOYEMEREY BLANK SAMPLES (continued)

Sam le T e ~Anal sis, Measured Activit Units gE,;

DI Mater Sr-89 ,pCi/1

.D,I Mater Sr-90 <1 pci/1 DI Mater Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 DI Mater . Sr-89 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-89 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90. < 1 pCi/1 "

DI Mater Sr-89 <1 pCi/1

.DI Water Sr-90 < 1 pCi/1 OI Mater ~ Sr-89 < 1 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-90 pCi/1.

DI Mater Sr -89 pCi/1 Sr-90 OI DI DI Water Mater Water Sr-89 Sr-90

< 1

< 1

< ]

pCi/1 pCi/1 pCi/1 3

DI Mater Sr-89 < 1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-90 < 1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-89 <1 pCi/1

~

DI Water 'r-90 < 1 pCi/1 Sr-89 <1 pCi/1

'I OI DI DI Mater Water Mater Mater Sr-90 Sr-89 Sr-90

<1

< 1 E-08 E-08 pCi/1 pCi/ml pCi/ml DI Mater Sr-89 pCi/1 Gross'1 DI Mater Sr-90 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 DI Mater Sr-90 pCi/1 OI Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 OI Mater Sr-90 pCi/1 DI Water Sr-89 <1 E-08 uCi/ml DI Mater Sr-90 E-08 uCi/ml DI Mater <1 pCi/1 5-18

Tab'le 5-1.0 (continued) gll LIT CO T OL - VEN E l978 SPIKED SAMPLES Sam le T e ~Anal sis Known Activit Measured Activit Units OI Mater Sr-90 73 80 + 8 dpm/sample Water Cs-137 53 50 + 5 pCi/1 Water 'Cs-137 53 50 + 5 pCi/1 Water Cs-137 53 45 + 5 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 73 75 + 5 dpm/sample Water Sr-90 1.5 E+03 1.4 + 0.1 E+03 dpm/sample Milk I-131 180 200 + 20 dpm/sample Water I-131 180 185 + 20 dpm/sample Mater I-131 170 180 + 20 dpm/sample Water I-131 150 150 + 15 dpm/sample Water I-131 150 160 + 20 dpm/sample Milk I-131 160 175 + 20 dpm/sample Water I-131 190 190 + 20 dpm/sample Mater I-131 190 200 + 20 dpm/sample Mi lk I-131 170 150 . + 20 dpm/sample Water Sr-90 1.5 E+03 1.5 + 0.2 E+03 dpm/sample Mater Sr-90 71 76 + 8 pCi/1 Water Gross 8' 63 + 6 53 + 5 pCi/1 Mater Gross 8 63 + 6 60 + 6 pCi/1 Mater Gross 8 63 + 6 60 + 6

+ pCi/1'Ci/sample Water Cs-137 35 39 8 5-19

R>>A>>AR, ", V dR} a w,>> 8 d a dad ~ s aa>>>>>>s Table 5-1.0 (continued)

RIIALI I COIIT - RACER ER I IE SPLIT SAMPLES Sam le T e ~AnaI sIs Ali uot A Aliauot B Units Milk Sr-89 5 5 pCi/1 Milk Sr-90 '5 + 2 3 + 1 pCi/1 Milk SI -89 5 5 pci/1 Milk Sr-90 11 + 4 13 + 2 pci/1 SW 5, + 2 2 pCi/1 LW Gross'ross'ross 5 + 2 8- + 2 pCi/1 SW S 7 + 2 6 + 2 pci/1 SW Gross'-3 8 3 8 3 pCi/1 CW 1.1 + 0.3 1.1 ~ + 0.3 'Ci/ml

~ '-20

Table 5.1.0 (continued)

Ill Ll Y CONTROL - RCRR RR l TR BLANK SAMPLES Sample T pe ~Anai sis Measured Activit Units Water Sr -89 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 pCi/1 Mater Sr-89 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 pCi/1 Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 Mater Sr-90 (1 pCi/1 Water Sr-89'r-90

<1 pCi/1 Water <1 pCi/1 Water Sr'-89 "1 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 pCi/1 Water Sr -89 <1 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 Water , Sr-89 'Ci/1 Water Sr-90 pCi/1 Water Sr -89 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 Wat Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 Mater Sr-89 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 Mater Sr-90 <1 pCi/1'Ci/1 Water. Sr-89 Water 'r-90 pCi/1 Mater Sr-89 pCi/1 Mater Sr-90 pCi/1 Mater Sr-89 pCi/1 Mater Sr-90, pCi/1 Water Sr-89 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 pCi/1 Water Sr-89 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 pCi/1 Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 Water Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 Mater Sr-90 <1 pCi/1 5-21 l I ~ =- < 'I <

L R I < I RI < I <, . ' ai < S ++ TVJ +I'Jl I a  %>sI

>>*w v ~,>>, a>> u A~ >>>> ~ w Aw ~ ~ >>9 4J~

Table 5-1.0 (continued)

EIIALIIY AL EEE I 1999

~ I BLANK SAMPLES (continued)

Sam le T e ~Ana1 sis Measured Activit Units Water Sr-89 <

< 1 I pCi/1

~

Mater Sr-90 "pCi/1 Water Sr-89 pCi/1 Mater Sr-90 < 1 pCi/1 Mater Sr-89 < 1 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 pCi/1 Water Sr-89 pCi/1 Mater Sr-90 pCi/1 Mater ~

Sr-89 < 1 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 < .I

< 1

'Ci/1 Water Sr-89 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 pCi/1 Water Sr-89 < 1 pCi/1 Mater Sr-90 pCi/1 Mater Sr-89 pCi/1 Mater Mater Mater Sr-90 Sr-89 Sr-90 1 pci/1 pCi/1 pCi/1 I

Mater Sr-89 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 pCi/1 Mater Sr-89 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 pCi/1 Mater Sr-89 .pCi/1 Water Sr-90 pCi/1 Mater S -89 < 1 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 . pCi/1 Water Sr-89 < 1 pCi/1 Mater Sr>>90 < 1 pCi/1 Mater Sr-89 <1 pCi/1 Mater Sr-90 pCi/1 Water I-125 <

< 1 I pCi/1 Water Gross 8 pCi/1 OI Mater H-3 0.2 pCi/ml

. OI Mater I-131 0.1 pCi/1 Charcoal Cartridge I-131 0.01 pCi/m3 AP Filter Sr-89 . 1 E-06 uCi/fi 1 ter AP Filter Sr-90 1 E-06 uCi/fi 1 ter 5-22

~=

9

(

f I

Table 5-1.0 (continued) gll IITY 9 T I- OTERBER BETE 9

SPIKED SAMPLES I

B Sam 'le T e 'Ana1 sis Known Activit 'easured Activit Units

.I Water Cs-137 32 30 + 5 pCi/1

'ater Cs-137 43 38 + 8 pCi/1 Mater I-125 570 550 + 60 dpm/s amp le Water Cs-137 36 34 + 5 dpm/sample Water I-125 240 230 + 20 pCi/sample Water '-125 520 530 + 50 dpm/sample Water Uranium 77 74 + 7 dpm/sample Mater H-3 278 280 + 30 dpm/sample Water Sr-90 30 + 3 25 + 3 pCi/sample Milk I-131'-131 35 + 4 35 + 4 pCi/sample Mater 36 + 34 3 pCi/sample Water I-131 36 + 4 32 3 pCi/sample Mater I-131 38 + ~

4 33 + 3 pCi/sample Water I-131 38 + 4 32 + .3 pCi/sample Mater I-131 37 + 4 33. + 3 pCi/sample Water Cs-137 35 38 + 5 pCi/sample Mater Cs-137 43 37 + 5 pCi/s'ample

- 9 a

r":

5-23 v v v rv'R~E 'm ew~r~fE r>> res'f vErstlss +w p ~BeeRR(,MpBw, Bp '~g F'B~T,

gA ~ ~ O'4 ~ ~ - g q14 A ~h ~W'j ' JM~ ~~ i .C ' ~

Table 5-1.1 RESULTS OF EPA"INTERLABORATORY COMPARISONS

'978.

" 'Month A enc Value MWF Value Unit Gross Al ha in AP Filters January 12 12+ 2 pCi/fi 1 ter March ll 11+ 1 pCi/fi 1 ter June 10 11+ 1 pCi/fi 1 ter Gross Beta'in AP Filters*

January 40 73+ 4 pCi/fi 1 ter March 38 42+ 4 pCi/f i lter June 36 38+ '4 pCi/fi 1 ter

• MWF reference nuclide is Cs-137. MWF data may'be expected at times to be biased high relative to EPA values depending on nuclide ratios.

Sr-90 in AP Filters January 10 7 + 3 pC i/fi 1 ter March 8 8+ 1 pCi/f ilter June 9 12+ 2 pCi/fi lter Cs-137 in AP Filters January 20 19+ 3 pCi/fi 1 ter March 22 26+ 3 pCi/fi l ter June 18 24+ 5 pCi/fi ter 1

5-24

Table 5-1.1 (continue4)

Month A enc Value MWF Value Unit Gross Al ha in Water January 7 5+ 2 pCi/f i 1 ter March 20 24+ 3 pCi/fi 1 ter May 13 13+ 2 pCi/fi 1 ter July 22 31+ 4 pCi/f i 1 ter September 5 6+ 2 pCi/fi 1 ter November ll 10+ 2 pCi/fi 1 ter Gross Beta in Water January 39, 42+ 4 pCi/1 March 29 28+ 3 pCi/1 May 18 19+ 2 pCi%1 July 30 32+ 3 pCi/1 September 10 13+ 3 pCi/1 November 26 26+ 3 pCi/1 H-3 in Water February 1680 1730 + 150 pCi/1 Apr

'une il 2200 2100 2450

+

+

- 100 300 pCi/1

'pCi/1 2270 ~

August 1230 1400 + 300 pCi/1 Cr-51 in Water February 0 50 pCi/1 April 0 50 pCi/1

.June 102 105 + 15 pCi/1 August 105 60 + 40 pCi/1 October 117 120 + 20 pCi'/1 5-25

Table 5-1.1 (continued)

Month A enc Value MMF Value Unit Co-60 in Water February 34 30 + 9 pCi/1 April 49 48 + 7 pCi/1 23 24 + 3 pCi/1 June'ugust 27 27 + 6 pCi/1 October 23 21 + pCi/1 Zn-65 in Mater February 29 33+ 9 pCi/1 April 59 48+ 9 pCi/1 June 54 53 + 12 pCi/1 August 62. 62 + 18 pCi/1 October 82 100 + 30 pCi/1 Ru-106 in Water February 36 50 pCi/1 April . 113 ~ < 50 pCi/1 June 58 35 + 13 pci/1 August 41 50 pCi/1 October '46 50 pCi/1 Cs-134 in Mater February 52 36+ 8 pCi/1 Apr i 1 53 53 + 10 pCi/1 June 22 14+ 3 pCi/1 August 9 5 pci/1 October .25 20+ 8 pCi/1 5-26

Table 5-1.1 (continued)

Month A enc Value MWF Value Unit Cs-137 in Mater February 0 6 pCi/l April 0 10 pCi/1 June 30 36+ 5 pCi/1 August 15 23+ 3 pCi/1 October 125 120 + 10 pCi/1 Sr-89 in Milk April 80 + 10 pCi/1 July 2 Sr-90 in Milk April 9 8+ 1 pCi/1 June 49 50+ 5 pCi/l I-131 in Milk b amma s ectrometr

~

April July 82 0

. 86 '+ 10'Ci/l 8

pCi/1 5-27

L ~ 4 0'l4 0 8 ~ ' '. ~ I JW4 t 4 Table 5-1.1 (continued)

Month A enc Yalue MWF Value Unit Ba-140 in Milk l April 0 20 pCi/1 July 0 20. pCi/l Cs-137 in Milk April 23 24+ 2 pCi/1 July 53 55+ . 6 'Ci/1 Sr-89 in Water May 16 16+ 3 pCi/1 August 1'4 17+ 4 pCi/1 September 19 ~

5 pCi/1 Sr-90 in Water May 17 24+ 4 pCi/1 August 10 11+ 2 pCi/1 September ~

16 21+ 3 pci/l ~

5-28

4 Table 5-1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL UALITY CONTROL ANALYSES

SUMMARY

1979 The tables below summarize results of samples run for process quality control

'urposes during 1979. These listings are in addition to such measurements as detector backgrounds, check source values, radiometric-gravimetric comparisons, system calibrations, etc. Detailed listings of each measurement are maintained at the laboratory and are available for inspection if required.

BLANK SAMPLES Nuclide =:; Number of Number of analyses exceeding

~Anal zed .

', .Determinations the LLD for that anal sis Gross Beta 80 1 Gross Alpha 52 0 Iodine-131 144 0 Strontium-89 199 0 Strontium-90 204 1 Gamma Emitters 44 0

.Tritium H-3 45 0 Calcium-45 2 0 Uranium 9 0 SPLIT SAMPLES

~

Nuclide Number of . No. agreeing No. agreeing No. differing

~Anal zed Det'ns within 2a within 3a b> 3a Gross Beta 91 87 3 1 Gross Alpha 7 7 0 0 Iodine-131 23 23 0 0 Strontium-89 74 73 0 1 Strontium-90 88 83 4 1 Gamma Emitters 69 69 0 0 Tritium H-3 69 68 ] a 0

Calcium-45 6 6 '0 0 SPIKED SAMPLES Nucl ide. Number of Mithin 2 a Within 3cr Differing from

~Anal zed Det'ns of known of known known b > 3a Gross Beta 55 48 5 2 Iodine-131 17 16 1 0 Strontium-89 1 1 0 0 Strontium-90 60 54 4 2 Gamma Emitters 29 29 0 0 Tritium H-3 28 27 1 0 Calcium-45 3 3 0 0 Uranium 5 5 0 0 5-29 I ~ ',e)',ape ~ 1t ~ pl 'eg Ic"-' 9 ~ << ~ t " e

' n ~" \ ed, ,e '" pen

<4 Via se J're ~ nns~ r ~ ra; ~

TableS-1. 3 EPA INTERCONPARISON RESULTS 1979 Control MWF Sample Agency Limits Measured

~Te ~Ana'I sis Va1ne ~3n n=1 +2a error Unit Air Filter Gross a 5 15 3+1 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Filter Gross B 18 15 20+2 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Filter Sr-90 6 4.5 7+2 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Filter Cs-137 6 15 9+1 pCi/fi 1 ter Water Gross < 6 15 7+2 pci/1 Water Gross e 10 15 13+1 pCi/1 Mater Gross B 16 15 14+2 pCi/1 Water Gross B 16 15 18+3 pCi/l.

Water H-3 1280 993 1230+300 pC1/1 Water'ater H-3 2270 1047 2300+200 pCi/1 Sr-89 14 15 9+1 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 6 4.5 6+1 pCi/1 Water I-131 40 12 43+4 pCi/1 Air Filter Gross a 14 15 13+1 pCi/fi ter 1

Air Filter Gross B 63 15 72+7 pCi/fi ter 1

Air Filter Sr -90 21 4.5 21+2 pC1/f i 1 ter Air Filter Cs-137 21 15 19+2 pCi/fi 1 ter Water H-3 '1540 1010 .1400+400 pCi/1 Mater

'ater Gross <

Gross B

~

9 12 r

15 15 1+1 5+2 pc1/1 pCi/1 1.

Milk Sr -89 42 5 24+15 pCi/1 Milk Sr-90 '54 3 54+6 pCi/1 ~

Milk I-131 96 5 107+17 pCi/1 Milk Cs-137 154 8 150+27 pCi/1 Mi lk Ba-140 0 0 10 pCi/1 Milk Sr-89 23 5 34+7 pCi/1 Mi lk Sr-90 30 1.5 31+5 pCi/1 Water Gross a 18 5 18+4 pCi/1 Mater Gross B 22 5 27+6 pci/1 Air Filter Gross a 9 15 10+1 pCi/fi ter 1

Air Filter Gross B 30 15 37+4 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Filter Sr-90 10 5 11+1 pCi/fi ter 1

Air Filter Cs-137 10 15 11+1 pCi/f ilter Milk Sr-89 5 15 < 10 pCi/1 Milk Sr-90 11 5 11+5 pCi/1 Milk I-131 17 15 5+3 pCi/1 Milk Cs-137 12 15 17+3 pCi/1 Milk Ba-140 0 0 < 30 pCi/1 Milk K-40 1630 250 2300+300 pci/1 5-30

Table 5-1.4 USOOE UAL'ITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 1979 Sample Measured Units T e Nucl ide Known +2a error Air Co-57 0.116 E+03 0.131%.013 E+03 pCi/fi 1 Air Sr-90 0.135 E+02 0.155+0.025 E+02 i ter 1

ter'Ci/f Air Ru-106 0.174 E+03 0.167+0.020 &03 pCi/fi ter 1

Air Sb-125 0.749 E+03 0.823+0.082 E+03 pCi/f i ter 1

Air Cs-134 0.985 E+02 0.947+0.095 &02 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Ca-45 0.134 E+03 0.230+0.023 E+03 pCi/fi 1 ter Soil K-40 0.216 E+02 0.235%.024 E+02 pCi/g Soil Sr -90 0.200 E+00 0.200+0.080 E+00 pCi/g Soil Cks-137 0.240 E0 0.266+0.027 E+00 PCi/9 Tissue K-40 .0.840 E+01 0:900+0.090 E+01 pCi/g Tissue Sr-90 0.440 E-02 0.200 E0 pCi/g Tissue Cs-137 0.230 E-01 0.120+0.030 E-01 pCi/g Vegetation K-40 0.225 E+03 0.220+0.022 E+03 pCi/g Vegetation Sr-90 0.573 E+01 0.593+0.059 E+01 pCi/g Vegetation Cs-137 . 0.256 EKO 0.280%.030 EKO pCi/g Water H-3 0.124 E+02 0.130+0.013 E+02 pCi/ml

"'ater Na-22 '.843 E+00 0.907+0.091 EKO pCi/ml Water Mn-54 . 0.737 E+00 0.800+0.096 E+00 pCi/ml =

Water Co-60 0.871 EKO 0.970+0.,097 EWO pCi/ml Water Cs-137 0.980 E+00 0.117+0.012 E+01 pCi/ml Air Be-7 0.'147 E&4 0.140%.020 E+04 pCi/f i 1 ter Air Ca-45 0.115 E+03 0.133+0.030 E+03* pCi/fi 1 ter Air Mn-54 0.540 E+02 0.490%.070 E+02 pCi/fi lter

~

Air Co-60 0.135 E+03 0.150+0.030 E+03 pCi/fi lter Air Sr-90 0.101 E+02 0.107.050 E&2 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Zr-95 0.252 E+03 0.210+0.030 E+03 pCi/f i 1 ter Air Sb-125 0.146 E+04 0.160+0.030 E&4 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Cs-137 0.130 E+03 0.125+0.014 E+03 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Ce-144 0.294 E+04 0.240%.041 E+04 pCi/fi 1 ter Air K-40 0.793 E+01 1.267+0.307 E+01 pCi/fi 1 ter Soil Cs-137 0.225 E-01 0.183+0.038 E-01 pCi/g Soil U E+01 '.188 0.420+0.150 E 00 pCf/9 Vegetation K-40 0.215 E+03 0.300.030 E+03 pCi/g Vegetation SI -90 0.337 E+01 0.250+0.045 E+01 pCi/g Vegetation Cs-137 0.270 E 00 0.317.070 E 00 pCi/g

• Correction for a calculation error was made.

5-31

Table 5-1.4 (continued)

USDOE UALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 1979 Sample Measured Units T Nuclide Known -+2< error Mater . H-3 0.1.34 E+02, 0.130%.018 E&2 pCi/ml Mater Na-22 0.153 E+01 0.130+0.020 E+01 pCi/ml Water Co-57 0.676 E 00 0.113+0.020 E+01 pCi/ml Mater Co-60. . 0.124,E+01 0.120+0.015 E+01 pCi/ml Mater Sr-89 0.342 E 00 0.340%.030 E 00 pCi/ml Mater Cs-137 0.124 E+01 0. 103+0.020 E+01 pCi/ml Mater .U 0.356 E-01 0.400.141 E-Ol pCi/ml.

Air Co-58 0.279 E+03 0. 180+0.031 E+03 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Sr-89 0.473 E&2 0.380<.076 E+02 . pCi/fi ter 1

Air Sr-90 0.164 E+02 0. 210+0.042 E+02 pCi/f i ter 1

Air Ru-106 0.500 E+03 0.570+0.060 E3 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Cs-134 0.288 E+03 0.255+0.037 E+03 'Ci/f i ter 1

'Air Cs-137 ~

0.347 E+03 0.275+0.042 E+03 pCi/filter Soil K-40 0. 245, K+01 0.460+0.092 E+Ol pCi/g Soil Co-60 0.668 E 00 0.500%.283 E 00 pCi/g Soil Sr-90 0.251 E+01 0.120+0.028 E+01 pCi/g Soil , Cs-137 0.608 EK2 0.390%.255 E2 pCi/g Tissue "

Sr-90 0.233 E+01 0.258+0.030 E+01 'Ci/g Mater H-3 0.304 E+02 0.293+0.029 E+02 pCi/ml Water Ca-45 0.940 E 00 0.867+0.116 E 00 pCi/ml Water Zn-65 0.232 E+01 0.220%.022 EIO1 pCi/ml t Sr-90 0.135 E 00 0.190~0.035 E 00 pCi/ml Water Cs-134 0.113 E+01 0.120%.012 E+01 pCi/ml Mater Cs-137 0.152 E+01 0.155+0.016 E+Ol pCi/ml 5-32

Table 5-1.5 ENVIRONMENTAL UALITY CONTROL ANALYSES

SUMMARY

1980 The tables below summarize results of samples run for process quality control purposes during 1979. These listings are in addition to such measurements as detector backgrounds, check source values, radiometric-gravimetric comparisons, system calibrations, etc. Detailed listings of each measurement are maintained at the laboratory and are available for inspection if required.

BLANK SAMPLES Nuclide Number of Number of analyses exceeding

~Ana1 zed Determinations ,

the LLD for that anal sis Gross Beta 68 0 Gross Alpha 43 0 Strontium-89 49 0 Strontium-90 178

~, 0

. Iodine-131 152 0 Tritium 87 0 Gamma Emitters 46 0 SPLIT SAMPLES Nuclide Number of No. agreeing No. agreeing No. differing

~Ana1 zed Det'ns within 2a 3 b > 3 Gross Beta 99 94 5 0',

Gross Alpha 25 23 . 1 0 Strontium-89 48 48 0 0 Strontium-90 48 48 0 0 Tritium 134 134 0 0 Iodine-131 77 77 0 0 Gamma Emitter s 121 120 0 0 Calcium-45 2 2 1 0 SPIKED SAMPLES Nuclide Number of Within 20 Within Q Differing from Det'ns of of known known b > 3..a

~Anal zed known Gross Beta 43 1 0 Strontium-89 23 23 2 0 Strontium-90 73 73 4 0 Tritium 52 51 1 0 Gamma Emitters 29 29 0 0 Iodine-131" 29 27 2 0 5-33

Table 5-1.6 EPA INTERCOMPARISON RESULTS 1980 Control MWF Sample Agency Limits Measured T e ~Anal sls Value ~3u n=l -2~ error Unit Mater I-131 53 15 49 5 pCi/1 Air Filter Grossa 10 15 11+1 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Filter Gross 8 31 15 34+3 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Filter. Sr-90 10 5 6+1 pCi/fi ter 1

Air Filter Cs-137 12 ~

15 16+4 pCi/fi 1 ter Mater Grossa 21 15 26+3 pCi/1 Water Gross 8 49 15 50+5 pCi/1 Mater Sr-90 7 5 8+1 . pCi/1 Water Co-60 33 15 37+4 pCi/1 Mater Cs-134 56 15 58+6 pCi/1 Water: Cs-137 0 0 <5 pCi/1 Mater Gr ossa'ross 12 15 13+1 pCi/1 Water 8 27 15 29+3 pCi/1 Air Filter Grossa ~

24 6 29+3 pCi/f i 1 ter Air Filter Gross 8 .28 5 41+4 pCi/f i 1 ter Air Filter Sr-90 8 2 . 9+1 pCi/fi ter 1

Air Filter Cs-137 12 5 14+2 p Ci/fi 1 ter Water H-3 2040 1040 2260+230 pCi/1 Air Filter Gross a 10 11+1 pCi/fi ter 1

Air Filter Gross S 29 5 33+3 pCi/fi ter 1

Air Filter Sr-90 9 1.5 10+1 pCi/fi ter 1

Air Filter Cs-137 10 5 12+1 pCi/fi ter 1

Mater Grosso 30 8 30+3 pCi/1 Mater Gross 8 45 5 45+5 pCi/1 Water Sr-89 10 5 <5 pCi/1 Mater Sr-90 20 1.5 20+2 pCi/1 Mater H-3 1750 341 1600+160 pCi/1 Mi lk Sr-89 10 5 <5 pCi/1 Milk Sr-90 25 1.5 18+3 pCi/1 Milk I-131 0.01 0.1 <5 pCi/1 Mi lk Cs>>137 40 5 43+4 pCi/1 Milk Ba-140 0.01 0.1 <10 pCi/1 Milk K 1600 80 2000+200 pCi/1 Mater Gross a 13 5 14+1 pCi/1 Mater Gross 8 22 5 23+2 pCi/1 Air Filter 15 5 18+2 pCi/f i lter Air Filter Gross'ross 8 41 , 5 50+5 pCi/fi l.ter Air Filter Sr-90 10 1.5 10+1 pCi/fi ter 1

Air Filter Cs-137 20 5 23+2 pCi/fi 1 ter 5-34

able 5-1.6

~ ~

continued)

EPA INTERCOMPARISON RESULTS 1980 Control MWF Sample Agency Limits Measured Tyue ~Anal sis Value ~3~ n=l +-2o error Unit Mater I-131 44 5 35+4 . pCi/1 Mater H-3 3400 360 3030+300 pCi/1 Mater Sr-89 5 5 <2 pCi/1 Mater Sr-90 12 1.5 12+1 pCi/1 Mater H-3 2000 345 2300+200 pCi/1 Mater Gross< 36 9 34+3 pCi/1 Water Grossa 38 5 . 4244 pCi/1 Mater H-3 1210 329 1100+100 pCi/1 Water Sr-89 24 8.6 27+3 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 15 2.6 14+1 pCi/1 Mater H-3 3200 625 3400+300 pCi/1 Water. Cr-51 86 8.6 < 100 pCi/1 Water Co-60 16 8.6 19+5 pCi/1 Water Zn-65 25 8.6 40+10 pCi/1 Mat'er Ru-106 46 8.6 < 50 pCi/1 Water Cs-134 20 8.6 24+5 pCi/1 Water Cs-137 12 8.6 15+3 pCi/1 Water Gross< 32, 8.0 31+3 pCi/1 Water Gross! .21 5'.0 22+2 pCi/1 Water Gross~ 16 8.6 21+2 pCi/1 Mater Gross~ 13 8.6 19+3 pCi/1 Air Filter Gross 24 10.0 25+3 pCi/f i 1 ter Air Filter GrossS 10 8.6 17+2 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Filter Sr-90 0 0.0 < 1 pCi/filter Air Filter Cs-137 10 8.6 10+1 pCi/fi 1 ter 5-35

+'\ '~ P \ ~ NIT- e l*s p 'p "IHIP 0 E f i e es

Table 5=1.7 USDOE UALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 1980 Sample Measured Units T e Nuclide Known '-2< error Air (80-4) Be-7 0.272 E+03 0.260+0.044 E+03 pCi/fi ter 1

Air (80-4) Mn-54 0.720 E+02 0.645+0.095 E+02 pCi/f ilter Air 80-4 Sr-90 0.199 E+02 0.143+0.094 &02 pCi/fi 1 ter Air 80-4 Zr-95 0.720 E+02 0.605+0.094 E+02 pCi/fi 1 ter Air (80-4) Sb-125 0.258 0.180+0.026 E+04 pCi/fi 1 ter Air (80-4 Cs-137 E+04'.25.7 E+03 0.230+0.034 E+03 pCi/fi 1 ter Air (80- 4) Ce-144 0.376 E+04 0.339+0.048 E+04 pCi/fi 1 ter Air (80-10) Be-7 0.230 E+04 0.270+0.038 E+04 pCi/fi ter 1

80-10) Co-60 0.200 E+03 0.225+0.032 E+03 pCi/fi ter.

1 80-1.0) Sr-90 0.107 E+02 0.105+0.016 E+02 pCi/fi ter 1

80-10) Cs-134 0.247 E+04 0.215+0.031 E+04 pCi/fi ter 1

80-10 Ce-1.41 0.404 E+03 0.475+0.'068 E+03 ~

pCi/fi I ter Air. 80-10 Ce-144 0.346 E+04 0.280+0.040'E+04 pCi/f i lter Mater (80-4) H-3 0.103 E+02 ~ 0.097+0.017 E+02 pCi/ml Water 80-4) Na-22 . 0.107 E+01 0.095+0.014 E+01 pCi/ml Water (80-4) Cr-51 0.137 E+01 0.170+0.029 E+Ol pCi/ml Water I80-4I Co-57 0.337 E 00 E 00 '.600+0.149 pCi/ml Water Co-60 0.922 E 00 0.900+0.127 E 00 pCi/ml Water 80-4) Sr-89 '.240 E-01 0.267+0.172 E-01 pCi/ml Mater 80-4 Cs-131 0.978 E 00 0.850+0.127 E 00 PCi/ml Water 80-4 U 0.283 E-01 0.200+0.173 E-Ol ug/ml Mater (80-10) H-3 0.149 E+02 0.133+0.017 E+02 pCi/ml Water 80-10) Co-60 0.197 E+01 0.207+0.036 E+01 pCi/ml Water 80-10) Sr-89 0.218 E 00 0.803+0.263 E-01 pCi/ml Mater 80-10) Sr-90 0.216 E-Ol 0.230+0.069 E-01 pCi/ml Water 80-10) Cs-134 0.244 0.283+0.052 E+01 pCi/ml Water (80-10) Cs-137 E&l E+01'.226 0.263%.045 E+01 pCi/ml Soil (80-4) K-40 0.770 E+01 1.100+0.341 E+Ol pCi/g Sr-90 0.374 E 00 0.300+0.172 E 00 pCi/g Soil 80-4 Cs-137 0.680 E+01 0.507+0.087 E+01 pCi/g Soil 80-10 K-40 0.207 E+02 0.273+0.053 E+02 pCi/g Soil 80-10 Co-60 0.100 E 00 0.100+0.100 E 00 pCi/g Soil 80-10 Sr-90 0.460 E 00 0.333+0.172 E 00 pCi/g Soil 80-10 Cs-137 0.110 E+02 0.110+0.017 E+02 pCi/g 5-36

Table 5-1.7 (continued)

USOOE UAlITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 1980 Sample Measured Units 4 T e Nuclide Known +2a error Tissue (80-4) K-40 0.143 E+02 ,0.207+0.036 E+02 pCi/g I

Tissue (80-4) Co-60 0.386 E+01 0.373+0.056 E+01 'Ci/g II ~

Tissue 80-4) Sr-90 0.182 E+02 0.180+0.034 E+02 pCi/g Tissue (80-4) Cs-137 0.122 E+02 0.103+0.018 E+02 pCi/9 Tissue (80-10) K-40 0.170 E+01 0.550+0.143 E+01 pCi/g 1

Tissue (80-10) Co-60 0.874 E+Ol 0.950+0.141 E+01 pCi/g Tissue (80-10) Sr-90 0.387 E+02 0.250+0.042 E+02 pCi/g Tissue (80-10 Cs-137 0.275 E+02 0.270+0.044 E+02 pCi/g 5-37

L4 l ~ I', " l,l tl.

~ 0 h E,; p)kl 0 4~ y t W'g A4 Table 5-1.8 ENVIRONMENTAL UAL!TY CONTROL ANALYSES

SUMMARY

1981 0 The tables below summarize results of samples run for process quality control purposes during 1981. These listings are in addition to such measurements as detector backgrounds, check source values, radiometric-gravimetric comparisons, system calibrations, etc. Detailed listings of each measurement are maintained at- the laboratory and are available for inspection if required.

BLANK SAMPLES Nuclide Number of Number of analyses exceeding Anal zed Determinations the LLD for that anal sis Gross Beta 46 1*

Gross Alpha 47 0 Strontium-89 95 0 Strontium-90 95 0 Tritium 61 1*

Gamma Emitters 64 ~

Q Iodine-131 191 0 Calcium-45 3 0 SPLIT SAMPLES Nuclide Anal zed Number Det'ns of within 2'ithin No. agreeing No. agreeing 3a Gross Beta 142 138 0 Gross Alpha 39 38 1 0 Gamma Emitters 126 122 4 0 Iodine-131 146 146 0 0 Strontium-89 38 38 0 0 Strontium-90 44 42 2 0 Tritium 89 89 0 0 Calcium-45 8 8 0 0 Uranium 71 71 0 0 SPIKED SAMPLES Nucl ide Number of Within 2a Within 3e Differing from Anal zed Det'ns of known of known ~kb 3 Gross Beta 55 53 1 ]*

Gama Emitters 44 43 1 0 Iodine-131 11 11 0 0 Strontium-89 18 18 0 0 Strontium-90 94 93 1 0 Tritium 45 44 1 0

• Corrective actions were taken to eliminate the problem.':

~;

5-38

Table 5-1.9 EPA INTERCOMPARISON RESULTS 1981 Control MWF Sample Agency Limits Measured T ~Anal sis Value ~3a n=3 error*

'2<

Unit I-131 22 6 17+2 pCi/1 Mater H-3 2240 604 2600+300 pCi/1 Air Filter Gro sa GrossB'ater 21 9.1 21+2 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Filter 19 8.7 28+3 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Filter Sr-90 0 0 LT 1 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Filter Cs-137 19 8.7 19+2 pCi/fi 1 ter Water Gross a 9 8.7 10+1 pCi/1 Mater GrossB 8.7 43+4 'pCi/1 Mater Sr-89 16 8.7 LT 5 pCi/1 Mater Sr-90 34 2.9 3.5+4. pCi/1 Milk Si -89 0 0 LT 2. pCi/1 Milk Sr-90 20. 2 2.6 . 14+1 'Ci/1 Milk ~ I-131 25.8 10.4 29+3 pCi/1

'ilk Milk Milk Cs-137

'Ba-140 K-40 43.5 1551 0

134 8.7 0 LT 47+5 1350+140 25 pCi/1 pCi/1 pCi/1

~

Mater H-3 1760 590 1680+170 pCi/1 Mater Cr-51 0 ~

0 LT 100 pCi/1

'Water Co-60 25 8.7 29+5 pCi/1

~

Mater Zn-65 85 8.7 92+9'T pCi/1 Water Ru-106 0 0 100 pCi/1 Water Cs-134 36 8.7 29+5 'pCi/1 Water Cs-137 4 8.7 9+3 pCi/1 Water Gross B 25 8.7 27+3 pCi/1 Mater Gross n 25 10.4 20+2 pCi/1 Air Filter Gross a 30 13 30+3 pCi/f i 1 ter Air Filter Gross B 50 8.7 66+7 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Filter Sr-90 18 2.6. 17+44 pCi/fi lter Air Filter Cs-137 14 8.7 15+2 pCi/fi 1 ter Mater H-3 2710 615 3000+300 pCi/1 Mater Cs-134 10 8.7, 7+2 pCi/1 Mater Cs-137 15 ".'.7 13+1 pCi/1 Mater Sr-89 . 38 8.7. 35+7 pCi/1 Mater Sr-90 28 2.6 24+3 pCi/1 Water Ra-226 15.0 4.0 13.2+1.3 pCi/1 Water Ra-228 12.0 ~

3.1 10+2 pCi/1 Mater 12 10 6+2 pCi/1 Mhen analyses of a particular type result in concentrations below the detection limits, the term "LT" is used to indicate "Less Than" values for that measurement based on 3o (99.55). confidence level. P 5-39

~

Jdl Cl 4( AJ Q (q 3 sl 4+ sy+ ~ pass )BJ &4a a 4 sj1 ~~ (ss4 4 CA AW( ~4 t '@A ~ ~ y 'If' Table 5-1.9 (continued)

EPA INTERCOMPARISON RESULTS 1981 Control MMF Sample Agencv Limits Measured

~Te ~AnaI sis Va1ee ~3q e=3 >2< error* Unit Water Sr-89 36 8.7 29+3 'Ci/1 Water Sr-90 2.6 Mater Mater

.Sr-89 Sr-90 22 25 '.7 ~ 26+3 30+8 pCi/1 pCi/1 11 3.6 14+2 pCi/l Mater'ater I-131 26'2 10 40+20 pCi/1 Cs-137 8.7 20+5 pCi/1 =

Water Ba-140 0 0 LT 20 pCi/1 Mater 1559 '35 1400+140 mg/l Water Cr-51 0 0 LT 20 pCi/1 Water Co-60 17 8.7 16+2 pCi/1 Mater Zn-65 0 0 L.T 20 pCi/1 Mater Ru-106 15 8.7 13+4 pCi/1 Water Cs-134 21 8.7, 13+2 pCi/1 Water Cs-137 31 8.7 25+3 pCi/1 Water H-3 1950 596 2300+200 pCi/1 Water Ra-226 6.7 1.7 5.9+0.4 pci/1

~

Water Ra-228 8.0 2.1 10.6+1.6 pCi/1 Air Filter Grossa 28 12 31+6 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Filter GrossS 54 8.7 .74+8 pCi/fi ter1 Air Filter Sr-90 19 2.6 21+5 pCi/filter Filter 'ir Cs-137 16 8.7 15+2 pCi/fi 1 ter Food "

Sr-89 44 8.7 38+4 pCi/kg Food Sr-90 31 2.8 28+3 pCi/kg Food, I-131 82 14 75+8 pCi/kg Food Cs-137 45 8.7 40+4'T pCi/kg Food Ba-140 0 0 25 pCi/kg Food K 2640 229 2267+227 mg/kg Mi lk Sr-89 25 8.7 13+3 pCi/1 Milk Sr-90 17 2.6 16+3 pCi/1 Milk I-131 0 0 LT 5 pCi/l.

Milk .:: Cs-137 31 8.7 35+12 pci/l Milk Ba-140 0 0 LT 16 pCi/1 K 1600 139 1463+305 mg/l

..ilk,'atey I-131 73 13 53+11 pCi/1 Mater H-3 2630 613 2973+878 pCi/1 Wat'er U 23 10 14+2 pCi/1 Water Sr-89 23 8.7 18+5 pCi/1 Water Sr-90 11 2.6 14+2 pCi/1

,Urine H-3 2050 599 2166+624 pCi/1 5-40

Table 5-1.9 (continued)

EPA INTERCOMPARISON RESULTS 1981 Control MWF Sample Agency Limits Measured

~Te ~Anal sis Value ~3a n=3 Qa error* Unit Water Ra-226 8.3 2.2 8.4+0.8 pCi/1 Mater Ra-228 11.7 3.0 4.6+3.7 pCi/1 Water Gross< 33 32+14 pCi/1 Water Gross ~ 28 8.7 30+6 pCi/1 Air Filter Gross< 25 11 25+6 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Filter 52 8.7 71+/ pCi/fi 1 ter Air Filter Gross'r-90 16 2.6 18+2 pCi/fi 1 ter Air Filter Cs-137 19 8.7 20+2 pCi/filter Mater Gross< 80 35 91+26 pCi/1 Water Gross B 96 8.7 112+11 pCi/1 Water Co-60 0 0 LT 5 pCi/1

~

Mater Sr-89 21 8.7 13+6 pCi/1 Mater Sr-90 14.4 2.6 14.6+2.0 pCi/1 Water Cs-134 12 2.6 14+2.0 pCi/1 Water Cs-137 15 8.7 20+14 pCi/1 Water Ra-226 12.7 3.3 11.8+3.5 pCi/1 Water Ra-228 9.2 2.4 8.3+5.1 pCi/1 Water U 15 10 9+2 pCi/1 Milk Sr-89 23 8.7 24+8 pCi/1 Milk Sr-90 18 2.6 14+5 pCi/1 Milk I-131 52 10 58+11 pCi/1 Milk Cs-137 25 8.7 29+9 'Ci/1 Mi lk Ba-140 0 0 LT 16 pCi/1 Milk K 1530'38 133 1700+240 mg/1 Food Sr-89 8.7 41+6. pCi/kg Food Sr-90 2'3 2.6 21+5 pCi/kg Food Co-60 30 8.7 35+8 pCi/kg Food Cs-137 33 8.7 32+8 pCi/kg Food Ba-140 0 0 LT 31 pCi/kg Food K 2730 236 2700+270 mg/kg Mater H-3 2700 615 29SO+127 pCi/1 5-41 h 5, Ih, \, ' ' h 5 5 a 5 5 hh I'5'l 'h sh W'Ia n 5 h . jiff ' hh

~ i+a+>>

>>kH 4 j +s4Z ~

' u 4 >s\)>>ss>>>>Qss. >>i's<<*ale>>id's,Ai' e '

s>>i 'a Table 5-1.10 EPA INTERCOMPARISON RESULTS (Lab Performance Evaluation Study - EMSL-LV) 1981 Control MWF

,Sample Agency Llmlts Measured T e sis Value . ~>n=3 +2a error* Unit Water Mater

'Anal Gross Gross 1

39 60 10 5'

s>>

39+4 70+7 pCi/1.

pci/1 Mater CO-60 12 LT20 pCi/1 Mater Cs-134 12'0 5 11+2 pCi/1 Mater Cs-137 5 20+2 pCi/1 Mater Ru-106 0 LT100 'Ci/1 Mater Zn-65 0 LT20 pCi/1 Water Sr-89 6 5 5+1 pCi/1 Water Sr -90 0 LTT pCi/'l Water Ra-226 12.8 1.8 12.6+1.3 pCi/1 Water U 5 6 4+2 pCi/1 5-42

Table 5-1.11 USDOE UALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 1981 Sample Measured Units T e Nuclide Known ~ 2 a err'or Air (81-04) Be-7 0.244 E+04 0.247+0.015 E+04 pCi/fi 1 ter Air (81-04) Mn-54 0.117 E+p3 0.093+0.006 E+03 pCi/fi 1 ter Air (81-04) Sr-89 0.450 E+p2 0.515+0.087 E+02 PCi/filter Air (81-04) Sr-90 0.630 E+01 0.100 E+02 pCi/filter Air 81-04) Zr-95 0.122 E+03 0.828+0.048 E+02 pCi/fi ter 1

Air 81-04) Sb-125 0.139 E+04 0.133+0.006 E+04 pCi/fi 1 ter Air (81-04) U 0.223 Eal 0.750%.053 E+01 pCi/fi 1 ter Soil (81 p4) X-40 0.213 E+02 290+0.017 E+02 pCi/g So 1 1 (81 p4) Cs-137 0.200 E+00 0.250%.070 E+pp pCi/g Soil (8] 04) Ra-226 0.770 E+pp 0.668+0.057 E+pp pCi/g Tissue (81 04) K-40 0.158 E+0] 0.433+0.058 E+01 pCi/g Tissue (81-p4) Sr-90 0.240 E+01 0.188+0.016 E+Ol pCi/g Tissue (81 p4) Ra-226 0.450 E+00 0.433+0.058 E+00 pCi/g Tissue (8] p4) U 0.290 E-01 0.850+0.333 E-01 pCi/g Vegetation (81-04) K-40 .0.224 E+03 0.277+0.018 E+03 pCi/g Vegetation '(81-04) Sr-.90 0.560 E+01 0.258+0.016 E+01 pCi/g Vegetation (81-04) Cs-137. 0.230 E+00 0.200.058 E+00 pCi/g Vegetation (81-04) U 0.310 E+00 0.133+0.058 E+00 pCi/g Mater (81-04) H-3 0.246 E+02 0.197+0.012 E+02 pCi/ml Mater (81-04) Co-57 0.118 E+01 0.243+0.018 E+01 pCi/ml Mater (81-04) Co-60 0.129 E+01 0.133+0.006 E+01 pCi/ml Water (81-04) Sr-90 0.440 E-01 0.405+0.063 E-01 pCi/ml Water 81-04) Cs-137 0.137 E+01 0..150+0.012 E+Ol pCi/ml Water 81-04) Ce-141 0.527 E+Ol 0.193+0.012 E+01 . pCi/ml Water 81-04) 0.145 E-01 0.200+0.026 E-pl ug/ml

'Water 81-04 U 0.102 E-01 0.750+0.140 E-02 pCi/ml 5-43

Table 5-1.12 ENVIRONMENTAL 1

EQUALITY CONTROL

SUMMARY

REPORT - 1982 SPIKES AND BLANKS Known Reported Spikes and Blanks

~Anal sis Value Value Ci

• Processed Alpha C'lank 5 45 H Alpha 76.8 (Am-241) 76.6+1.8 32 Beta Blank <2 49 Beta 61.0 (Cs-137) 61.5+2.8 42 H-3 Blank '<

1 67 H-3 4450 4400 +140 71 U-234 Blank < 0.2 26 U-234 7.1 6.8+0.7 26 Th-230 Blank < 0.2 10 Th-230 5.7 6.2+1.6 ~ '10 Ra-226 Blank < O.l. 26 Ra-226 ~

0.85 0.92+0.32 24.

Pb-210 Blank <1 21

'31.5 P6-210 Sr-90 Blank 31.6+0.7 .

21 39 J

Sr-90 24.2 21.0+3.7 31 PU-239 PU-239'm-241 Blank 1.7 Blank

< 0.2 1.8+0.5

< 0.2 15 15 2

]

Am-241 3.6 3.6+0.2 2 Fe-55 Blank <1 3 Fe-55 400 390+40 3 18eginning in July, the quality Control Summary Data was a combined summary representing both the Midwest Facility and the Albequerque Lab.

5-44

Table 5-1.12 (continued)

ENVIRONMENTAL DUPLICATES

~Ana1 sis First Ali uot Ci Second Ali uot Ci Alpha 29 + 4 23 + 4 Alpha < 5 < 5 Alpha < 5 < 5 Alpha 16 +8 14 +8 Alpha 10 + 2 10 + 2 Alpha 21 + 4 22 + 4 Alpha 12 + 6 7 +5 Alpha 18 +2 20 +2 Alpha 13 +4 15 +3 Beta 8 ~ + 4 11 4 Beta 10 +6 6 + 5 Beta < 2 < 2 Beta 4 + 2 4 +2 Beta 3 + I 3 .+ I Beta 9 +3 10 +3 Beta 3 + I 3 +I Beta < I < I Beta 2 +I .2 + I Beta 10 + I 13 +2 Beta 5 + 2 5 + 2 Beta 8. + 2 7 '+ I Beta 6 + 3 \ 6 + 3 Beta 64 + 5 73 + 5 Beta 6 +I 6 + I Beta ~

6 +2 5 + 2 Beta 4 + I 4 + I H-3 340 +10 350 +10 H-3 76 +10 67 +10 H-3 5 + I 6 + I H-3 < I H-3 < I < I H-3 < I < I H-3 < I H-3 + I + I H-3 H-3 17 + I 17 + I H-3 < I < I H-3 1820 +20 1840 +20 H-3 24 +I 24 + I H-3 8 + I 9 + I M-3 0.6 + 0.5 0.7 + 0.5 H-3 0.9 + 0.5 0.7 + 0.5 5-45 hyh'/+ah l Vh, rlhh(Sh ", ~ hl,, l V h <<Vh NV h$ ) 1hhat g ll P, l Vl 0 l . ~,'Shah'PO 'h ~ '

Tab1e 5-1;12

{continued)

ENVIRONMENTAL DUPLICATES A~nal sis First A)i uot Ci Second Ali uot Ci U-235 8.1 +'1.0 8.6 + 1.2 U-234 15 +2 14 +2 U-234 250 +10 230 +10 U-234 4.3 + 1.0 4.3 + 1.0 U-234 2.9 + 1.0 4.2 + 1.2 U-234 11 +2 8.0 + 1.6 U-234 5 +1 4 +1 U-234 0.6 + 0.1 0.5 + 0'.1'.2 U-234 0.2 U-234 39 +2 43 +3 U-234 290 .+10 280 +10

'U-238 45'+3 40 +3 U-238 0.5 + 0.1 0.5 + 0.1 Gamma <15 (15 Gamma (25 (25 Gamma <25 <25 Gamma <25 <25 Gamma <25 ~

<25 Gamma . <15 <15 Gamma 0.8 + 0.1 0.8 + 0.1 GamIla 2.2 + 0.2 2.0 + 0.2 Ganja <25 <25 Garma <<15 <15 Gamma <15 <15 Gamma <25 <25, Gamma <10 (10 TI1-230 0.5 + 0.2 0.4 + 0.1 Tjl-230 2.1 + 0.3 2.3 + 0.3,

- Ra-226 2.7 + 0.8 3.6 +

Ra-226 1.1..'.0 5.0 + 1.5 + 1.5:

Ra-226 1.2 + 0.4 0.9 + 0.3 Ra-226 1.3 + 0.4 + 0.6 '.0 Ra-226 0.8 + 0.2 0.5 + 0.;2 Ra-226 0.4 + 0.1 0.4 + 0.1 Ra-226 0.4 + 0.1 0.3 +."0.1 Ra-226 3 + 1 3 +1 5-46

Table 5-1.12 (continued)

ENVIRONMENTAL DUPLICATES

~Ana1 sis First Ali uot Second Ali uot Ci Pb-210 37 +4 35 +5 Pb-210 23 +8 31 +7 Pb-210 18 +10 25 +9 Pu-239 3.4 + 0,4 3.1 + 0.3 Pu-239 . 0.16+ 0.02 0.15+ 0.02 Pu-239 7.3 + 0.7 7.4 + 1.2 Am-241 0.48+ O.ll 0.57+ 0.11 Am-241 O.lO+ O.Ol 0.10+ 0.01 Sr-89 70 +20 110 +20 Sr-89 23 +9 26 +9 Sr-90 <1 Sr-90 140 +20 130 +20 Sr-90 <1 <1 Sr-90 9 +2 10 +2 Sr-90 0.4 + 0.3 0.7 +0.3 I-131 I-131 5-47

%P I tV ~ 1~ k I J t ~ 0 a 8 'W

'.?

Table 5-1.13 ENVIRONMENTAL USEPA - EBERLINE 1982 Sam le T e ~Anal sts EPA Value EIC Value Unsts Mater Alpha 16+5 +

16+3 pCi/1 Water Alpha 55 24 27 + 13 pCi/1 Mater Alpha 19 + 8.7 pCi/1 Water Beta 24 + 8.7 24+ 5 pCi/1 Water Beta 81 + 8.7 64 + 6 pci/1 Water Beta 23+ 5 16 + 7 pCi/1 Mater H-3 1830 +340 1760 +510 pCi/1 Mater H-3 2890 +380 2830 +82/ pCi/1 Water H-3 2860 +620 1890 +600 pCi/1 Mater Ra-226 13.4+ 2.0 13.6+ 4.0 'Ci/1 Mater Ra-226 12.5+ 3.2 11.8+ 3.5 pCi/1 Water Ra-226 10.5+ 1.6 8.4+ 2.5 pCi/1 Mater Ra-228 3.6+ 0.9 3.4+ 1.9 pCi/1 Water Ra-228 8.7+ 1.3 9.4+ 3.6 pCi/1 Mater Ra-228 11.0+ 1.7 '7.7+ 14.7 pCi/1 Mater Cs-134 1.8+ ~

8.7 ~ < 10 pCi/1 Water Cs-134 35 + 5 36+3 pCi/1 Water Cs-137 25+5 28 .+ 3 pCi/1

.Water C,s-137 20 + 8.7 16+ 7 pCi/1 Mater I-131 4.4+ 0.7 5.5+ 1.8 pCi/1 Mater I-131 87 + 8.7 67 + 14 pCi/1 Mater Cr-51 23 + 5 < 59 pCi/1 .?

Water Co-60 29 + 5 31+ 3 pCi/1 Water Zn-65 26+ 5 29 + 10 pCi/1 Mater Ru-106 0 < 25 pCi/1 Water Pu-239 6.9+ 0.7 7.2+ 0.4 pCi/1

, Mater Ur anium 30+ 6 24+ 4 pCi/1 Mater Gross Uranium 16 + 10 .9+1 pCi/1 Mi lk Sr-89 25 + 5 12 + 7 pci/1 Mi lk Sr-90 16 + 1.5 13+ 3 pCi/1 Milk Co-60 30 + 5 51 + 9 pCi/1 Milk Cs-137 28+ 5 39 + 19 pCi/1 Milk Ba-140 0 <489 pCi/1 Milk K 1500 + 75 1310 +120 mg/1 Milk I-131 5.4+ 0.8 6.7+ 3.1 pCi/1 5-48

Table 5-1.13 (continued)

ENVIRONMENTAL a

USEPA - EBERLINE 1982 Sam le 7 e ~Anal sis EPA Va1ue EIC Value Units Air Filter Alpha 32 + '8 24 + 19 pCi/Sample Air Filter Beta 67+5 77 + 10 pCi/Sample Air Filter Sr-90 , 20 + 1.5 .- 17 + 4 pCi/Sample Air Filter Cs-137 27 + 5 27 + .9 pCi/Sample 5-49 St as n qwp p,t ~

Table 5-1:14 USDOE UALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 1982 Sample Measured T e Nuclide .Known + 2a error Units Air. 81-10) Co-57 0.243 E&3 0e 164+0.017 E+03 pCi/fi ter 1 I 81-10) Co-58 0.327 E+02 0.131+0.020 E+02 pCi/fi ter 1 Air 81-10) Co-60 0.378 E+03 0.348+0.039 E+03 pCi/fi 1 ter Air 81-10) Sr-90 0.990 E+01 0.910+0.600 E+01 pCi/fi 1 ter Air 81-10) .Sb-125 0.104 EK4 0.585+0.062 E+03 pCi/fi ter 1 Air 81-10) Cs-137 0.175 E+03 0.124+0.013 E+03 pCi/fi 1 ter K-40 0.200 E+02 0.260+0.030 E+02 pCi/g So i 1 81-10 Cs-137 0.419 E+01 0.390+0.040 E+01 pCi/g Water 81-10) H-3 0.156 E+02 0,153+0.020 E+02 pCi/ml'Ci/ml Water 81-10) Cr-51 0.692 E+01 0.730+0.100 E+Ol Water 81-10 Mn-54 0.135 E+01 0.120+0.012 E+Ol pCi/ml Water ( 81-10) . Fe-59 0.181 E+01 0.140+0.014 E+01 pCi/ml Water 81-10) Sr-90 0.110 E+00. 0. 129+0.021 E+00 pCi/ml Water 81-10) Ce-144 0.113 E+02 ~

0.227+0.030 E+02 pCi/ml Vegetation (81-10) K-40 0'.296 E+02 0.455+0.050 E+02 pCi/g Vegetation (81-10) Sr-90 0.1333 E+02 0.137+0.014 E+02 pCi/g Vegetation !81-10) Cs-137 0.380 E+00 0.293+0.029 E+00 PCi/9 Vegetation q81-10 U 0.430 E-01 0.450+Oe130 E-Dl ug/g 5-50

Table 5-1.15 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT - 1983 (JANUARY - JUNE)

ENVIRONMENTAL SPIKES AND BLANKS Known Reported Spikes and Blanks

~Anal sis Value Ci Value Ci Processed JANUARY Alpha Blank <5 4 Alpha 76.8 (Am-241) 76.6 +0.6 4

. Beta Blank <2 6 Beta 61.0 (Cs-137) 61. 1+0.8 6 H-3 Blank 5 H-3 4450 4450 +150 5 U-234 Blank <0.2 3 U-234 7.1 6.9 +1.2 3 Ra-226 Blank <0.1 3.'

Ra-226 0.85 0.77+0.11 Pb-210 Blank <1 Pb-210 31.5 31.5 +1.3 Pu-239 Blank <0.1 5 PU-239 1.9 2.0 +0.2 5 Sr-90 Blank ~ - <1 17 Sr-90 21.2 20.7 +4-8 17 Gamma Blank <15 1 Gamma 54.5 60.8 +9.0 1 FEBRUARY

, Alpha Blank <5 6 Alpha 76.8 (Am-241) 76.9 W.3 6 t

h~

Beta Blank <2 9 Beta =

61.0 (Cs-137) 62.0 +4.3 9 H-3 Blank <1 4 H-3 4450 4490 +210 4 Th-230 Blank <0.2 2 Th-230 5.7 6.1 +1.1 2 Ra-226 Blank <0.1 2 Ra-226 0.85 0.80+0.06'1 2 Pb-210 Blank 8 Pb-210 31.5 31.7 +2.5 8 PU-239 Blank, <0.1 2 PU-239 1.7 1.9 +0.2 2 Sr-90 Blank <1 10 Sr-90 21.2 21.5 +5.4 10..

5-51 V t ~ ht ~ h/t hh tt tW\ thh . t 8 t t tt

Table 5-1.15 (continued)

- - j tlUALITY CONTROL REPORT 1983 (JANUARY JUNE)

ENVIRONMENTAL O.,

SPIKES AND BLANKS Known Reported Spikes and Blanks

~Ana1 sss Value Ci Value Ci Processed MARCH Alpha Blank < 5 Alpha 76.8 (Am-241) 76.7 +0.7 Beta Blank'1.0

< 2 5 Beta (Cs-137) 61.8 +3.6 5 H-3 Blank < 1 5 H-3 4450 4490 +290 5 Ra-226 Blank < 0.1 3 Ra-226 0.85 0.76+0.23 3 s Pb-210 Bl'ank < 1 4 Pb-210 31.5 '32.0 +8.2' 4 Pu-239 Blank 0.1 2 PU-239 1.7 2.0 +0.4 2 Sr-90 Blank 1 6 Sr-90 21.2 22.0 +1.9 Cs-137 Blank < 15 Cs-137 109 . 106 +25 APRIL Alpha Bl ank < 5 5 Alpha 76.8 (Am-2410 77.0 +0.6 5 Beta Blank < 2 5 Beta 61.0 (Cs-137) 62.6 +7.2 5 H-3 Blank 3 H-3 4450 4520 +230 3 Th-230 Blank < 0.2 Th-230 5.7 5.8 +1.5 Ra-226 Blank < O.l 1 Ra-226 0.85 0.75+0.23 1 Pb-210 Blank < 1 7 Pb-210 31.5 31.6 +2.9 7 Pu-239 Blank < 0.1 3 PU-239 1.7 2.0 +0.5 3.

Sr-90 Blank < 1 6 s Sr-90 21.2 21.9 +2.1 6 5-52

Table 5-1.15 (continued)

QUALITY CONTROL REPORT - 1983 (JANUARY - JUNE)

ENVIRONMENTAL SPIKES AND BLANKS Known Reported Spikes and Blanks

~Ana1 sis Value Ci Value Ci Processed Alpha Blank 5 4 Alpha 44.6 (Am-241) 44.8 +0.3 4 Beta. Blank < 2 8

---=-" 'Beta 61.0 (Cs-137) 61.9 +7.3 8 H-3 Blank < 1 4 H-3 4450 4470 +240 U-234 Blank < 0.2 3 U-234 ' 7.1 7.2 "0.3 3 Th-230. ; Blank < 0.2 5

'h-230 5'7 6.3 +1.5 5

'a-226 Blank 0.1

'a-226 0.85 0.85+0.24 Pb-210 Blank 1 2 Pb-210 31.5 31.3 +1.0 2 PU-239 Blank < 0.1 2 Pu-239 1.7 1.8 +0.2 2 Sr-90 Blank I 5 Sr-90 21.2 22.8 +6.3 5 JUNE Alpha Blank 5 5 Alpha 44.6 (Am-241) 45.0 +0.4 5 Beta Blank 2 14 Beta 61.0 (Cs-137) . 61.5 +1.2 14 H-3 Blank 1 4 H-3 4450 4420 +100 4 U-234 Blank 0.2 3 U-234 7.1 6.8 +1.3 3 T}1-230 Blank 0.2 2 Th-230 5.7 5.4 K.5' 2 Ra-226 Blank 0.'1 6 Ra-226 0.85 0.81.13 6 Pb-210 Blank 1 4 Pb-10 31.5 31.6 +0.8 4 Sr-90 Blank < 1 3 Sr-90 21.2 21.1 +0.9 3 5-53 1IN Vlk<1 %N'J . V ~ as Pa aP I

Tab1e 5-1.15 (continued)

EQUALITY CONTROL REPORT 1983 - (JANUARY - JUNE)

OUPL ICATES Number

~Anal sis Processed 2 Si ma Within 3 Sigma A1pha Beta H-3 U-234 30 86 76 3'ithin 7

30 86 76 7

0 0

0 0

Ra-226. 7 7 ~

0 Pb-210 12 11 1 PU-239 16 16 0 Sr-89 25 25 0 Sr-90 30 30 0

. Gamma 13 13 0 PU-239 3 0

~~

5-54

Table 5-1.16 USEPA CROSS CHECK PROGRAM

SUMMARY

(JANUARY JUNE) 1983:

s Sam le T e ~Anai sis EPA Value EIC Value Units Water I-131 37 + 10 26 + 5 pCi/1 Mater I-131 27 + 10.4 19+ 4 pCi/1 Mater Ra-226 12,. 7+ 3.'3 8.2+ 2.5 pCi/1 Water Ra-226 11.0+ 2: 9. 9 + 3 pCi/1 Mater Ra-228 7 pCi/1 Water Ra-228 0 6.0 pCi/1 Water Alpha 11' 8.7 17 + 3 pCi/1 Water Alpha 29,'.+:13 17 + 7 pCi/1 Water Beta 31 + 8.7 44 + 6 pCi/1 Mater Beta 5.7 +' 8.7 46 + 5 pCi/1 Water Sr-89 29.2+ 8.7 12 + 8 pCi/1 Mater Sr-90, 17.2+ 2.6 22.3+ 4.4 pCi/1 Mater Cr-51 45 + 8.7 102 + 30 pCi/1 Water Co-60 22 + 8.7 23 + 3 pCi/1 Water Zn-65 21 + 8.7 20 + 3 pCi/1 Water Ru-106 48 +'.7 49 + 13 ~

pCi/1 Water Cs-134 20 + 8.7 21 + 3 pCi/1 Water Cs-137 19 + 8.7 20 + 3 pCi/1 Water H-3 2560 +612 3090 +510 pCi/1 Water H-3 ~ 1990 +345 2170 +760 pCi/1 Mater Pu-239 8.6+ 1.5 9.0+ 0.5 pCi/1 Water Uranium 31 + 10.4 27 + 5 pCi/1 Milk . Sr-89 -37 + 8.7 19+ 9 pCi/1 Mi lk Sr-90 18 + 2.6 11 + 4 pCi/1 Milk I-131 55 + 10.4 66+ 7 pCi/1 Milk Cs-137 26 + 8.7 28+3 pCi/1 Mi lk 1512 +131 1850 +200 mg/1 Food Sr-89 35 + 8.7 31 + 19 pCi/kg Food Sr-90 28 + 8.7 42 + 9 pCi/kg Food I-131" 37 + 10.4 <27 pCi/kg .

Food I-131 25 + 10 < 101, pCi/kg Food Cs-137 31 + 87 52 + 23 pCi/kg Food Cs-137 27 + 8.7 33.+ 12 pCi/kg Food K-40 2780 +240 3400 +500 pCi/kg 5-55

a an&a Table 5-1.16 (continued)

USEPA CROSS CHECK PROGRAM

SUMMARY

(JANUARY - JUNE) 1983 Sam le T e ~Ana1 sis EPA Value EIC Value Units Air Filter Alpha .

27;1+ 11.7 20 + 2 pCi/Filter Air Filter Alpha 26 + 11.2 19 + 2 pCi/Filter Air Filter Beta 68 +. 8.7 72 + 7 pCi/Filter Air Filter Beta 59.2+ 8.7 77 + 10 pCi/Filter Air Filter Sr-90 16.1+ 2.6 14 + 8 pCi/Filter Air Filter Sr-90 20 + 2.6 26+8 ~ pCi/Fi 1 ter Air Filter Cs-137 27 + 8.7 42+ pCi/Filter Air'Filter Cs-137 '7.0+ 8.7 32+26 PCi/Filter

~ k

~4 5.2 NUS Radiological Laboratory Quality Control Data The following report describes the quality control program and sum-marizes .quality control data for NUS Radiological Laboratory, a vendor of analytical services for the pre-operational RENP for MNp-2.(28) 5-57

~w w A aw ~ 1~aW 4MI ~Asm M~ Aa~~~A k i - ' wu I

0

=':}

al

l

]

~

• l 0

J

SUMMARY

OF QUALiTY COHTROL DATA FOR THE HUS RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY

'983 HUS Corporation Environmental Services Division 5350 Campbells.Run Road Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15205 March 1984 5-58

l 4" '~ w44 y A 4I A 1~ AA'L WIS ~ ~ kd ~ M J~l .h ~ u i ~~ VSAINA+~

0 l W

N

~]f

~

/j II J

)

J

NUS RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY QUALITY. ASSURANCE PROGRAM DECENBER 1983 NUS RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM A. Introducti on B. Laboratory Analyses for Quality Assurance RESULTS OF 1983 NUS RADIOLOGICAL LABORATORY INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM A. Gross Alpha Analysis

l. Air Particulate

a. duplicate analysis

2. Water

a. i dup1 ca te analysis

b. blinds, spikes and references B. Gross Beta Analysis

1. Air Particulate

a. duplicate ana'1ysi s

2. Water

a. duplicate analysis

b. blinds, spikes and references C. Gamma Spectral Analysis

. I. Air Particulate

a. 'uplicate analysis

b. blinds, spikes and references

2. Hi 1 k

a. duplicate analysis

b. blinds, spikes and references

3. Water

a. duplicate analysis

b. blinds, spikes and references

4. Solids

~

a. dry weight duplicate analysis

b. wet weight

i. dup1 ica te .analysi s

c. blinds, spikes and references

~ ~

5<<59

iodine-131

1. Char coal Cat tridges

a. duplicate analysis blinds, spikes and references

2. Milk

a. duplicate analysis

b. blinds, spikes and references

3. Water

a. duplicate analysis

b. blinds, spikes and references S tr anti um

1. Mi lk

a. duplicate analysis

b. blinds, spikes. and references ~

2. Water a>> duplicate analysis

b. blinds, spikes and references Tl i tium

i. Water a

b.

4

'uplicate analysis blinds, spikes and references

2. Urine a ~ duplicate'analysis

b. blinds, spikes and references 5-60

III. RESULTS OF 1983 EPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM A. Gross Alpha Analysis

1. Water B. Gross Beta Analysis

1. Water C. Gamma Spectral Analysis

1. Milk

2. Water D. Iodine-131

1. Mi l k

2. Water Plutonium (water)

F. Radium (water)

1. Ra-226 8 -228 G. Strontium 1.. Milk

2. Water H. Tritium

1. Water

2. Urine Uranium Water K. Radionuclides on Air Particulate L. EPA "Blind" Analysis (water)

M. Results of Sixth International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters IV. REPORTING OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS V. PERFORMANCE CHECK

SUMMARY

A. High Resolution Gamma Spectrometry System B. Gas Propor tional Counter C. Liquid Scintillation Counter

'-VZ. CHEMICAL YIELD DETERMINATI'ON 5-61

'w'F4 +se~a <im~sdMM <<vs..awf<<',' %vta "l

3

~

~ ~

03 1

~ ~

L

']

0,

7 7

A. Introduction The quality assurance program of the NUS Radiological Laboratory is . briefly described in this report.

Information on each incoming sample is entered in a permanent log book. A sample number is assigned to each sample at the time of receipt. This sampl'e

~E number uniquely identifies each sample.

jE Laboratory counting instruments are calibrated, using radionuclide standards obtained from the National Bureau of Standards, the EPA, and reliable commercial suppliers, such as Amersham-Searle. Calibration of counting instruments is maintained by regular counting of radioactive reference sources. Background counting rates are measured regularly 'on all counting instruments. Additional performance checks for the gamma-ray scintillation spectrometer include regular checks and .adjustment, when necessary, of energy ca,libration.

~

Blank samples are processed with each group of samples analy'zed for specific radionuclides, using radiochemical separation procedures, as a check for possible cross-contamination. Blind, spiked (known quantities of radi oacti vi ty added), and replicate samples are processed frequently to determine'analytical precision and accuracy.

5-63 17w~>>7 W 8>> ~ A '7>>>> PV 7 s ~ ~e ~ ~ ~ s7 y ~,r>>r yv ~ ~, =- ~

~ W>> 77>>~vwrw

M{I I W, <<f <<<<'<<LIK ~ 1, rJLLI<<J<<<<. 1<<<<V+ \,. L & - + ~~ 1 J <<, " 'I ~

~L ~1<< ~L The quality assurance procedures employed in the conduct of radiological 1

moni toring programs by the Environmental Ser vi ces Di visi on Ra di ol ogi cal Laboratory are as required in Section 5.0 of the HUS Environmental Services Oivision t)uality Assurance Hanual, 9019-XX, and detailed'in HUS Radiological Laboratory cwork Instructions. These pr'ocedures include the requirement for (1) laboratory analysis of samples distributed by appropriate government or other standards-maintaining agencies in a laboratory intercomparison program, and (2) analysis in duplicate of a specific fraction of the client's environmental samples.

The HUS Radiological Laboratory also participates in the U.S. Environmental Protection 'Agency I Radioactivity Intercomparison Studies (Cross-check)

Program, the results of which are included wit)in this report.

<< ~

5-64

SECTION II RESULTS OF 1983 NUS RADIOLOGICAL LABORA)ORY INTERNAL (}UALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 5-65 ffl ~= ' fh IfA,W,'0 PW

II JQ 1L L '~ C LACk 4 %P k I( ~L 4 t hk1'Lk l PA ~ '~J' d Ig ~ Hl 1 4 A, I) t

.q j

~

0 Jl J

.I I

II

'I l

'I 3

,J 3 C

d i

0)

A-1 GROSS ALPHA ON AIR PARTICULATE FILTER (Page 1 of 2)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal'quality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result kl Result 02 NUS IDj'ollection Date + 2s (E-03 pCi/m ) + 2s (E-03 pCi/m )

3 023300/01 01/04/83 LT 4 LT 4 023460/61 01/12/83 LT. 2 LT 1.2 023500/01 Ol/18/83 LT 3 LT ).3 023620/21 01/28/83 LT 3 LT 2 023760/61 02/02/83 ~ . LT 2 LT 1.6 024060/61 '2/22/83 . LT 8 LT 8 024300/01 03/10/83 LT 6 LT 10

. 024360/61 03/16/83 19 + 5 10 + 4 024560/61 03/30/83 LT 5 9.7 + 5.8 024660/61 04/06/83 6.4 + 5.5 12 + 7 024860/61 04/12/83 LT 7 LT 6 024900/01 04/19/83 LT 5 LT 5 025120/21 05/03/83 5.2 + 3.8 7.2 + 4.1 025300/01 05/17/83 9.3 + 5.4 6.8 + 6.2 025420/21 05/24/83 LT 5 LT 9 025580/81 06/01/83 5.5 + 4.8 LT 6 025680/81 06/08/83 4.0 + 2.9 2.5 + 2.5 LT = Less Than 5-66

A-1 GROSS ALPHA ON AIR PARTICULATE FILTER

. (Page 2 of 2)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal guality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 81 Result 82 NUS ID8 Collection Date + 2s (E-03 pCi/m ) + 2s (E-03 pCi/m3 )

025780/81(1) 06/14/83 LT 2 LT 3 026000/01 06/22/83 4.9 + 2.5 2.6 .'+ 1.9 026160/61 06/28/83 33 + 24 LT 2 026340/41 07/06/83 LT 2 37 + 20 026560/61 07/13/83 2.0 + 1.7 LT 3 027040/41 (2 ) 07/26/83 3.0...+ 2. 4 LT 3 027300/01 08/02/83 LT 3 3.9 + 3.0 027580/81 08/09/83 3.2 + 2.6 LT 3 027880/81 08/17/83 2.8 + 2.2 ~

4..2 + 2.8 028140/41 08/23/83 6.0 + 3.5 7.1 + 4.0 028320/21 08/30/83 6.1 + 3.0 LT 3 028920/21 09/14/83 5.2 + 2.6 029920/21 10/11/83 LT 2 1.6 + 1.5 030260/61 10/18/83 1.9 + 1.7 LT 1 .3 030940/41 11/08/83 1.7 + 1.2 1.6 + 1.4 030900/01 11/09/83 LT 0.2 LT 0 .5 031640/41 11/22/83 1.2 + 1.0 2' + 1.2 LT = Less Than (1) Previously reported value was incorrectly calculated.

(2) Previously reported date was start collection date.

5-67

A"2 GROSS AL'PHA IN HATER (Page 1 o'f 2)

NVS Radiological Laboratory Internal qua'lity Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Col l ecti on Result 81 Result 82 NUS ID8 Date + 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/1) 022820/21 12/14/SZ 78 + 33 8.6 +, 3.4 022860/61 01/15/83 LT 3 LT 3 023120/21 01/21/83 LT 3 LT 2 023200/01 01/25/83 LT 2 ~ LT 3 024440/41 04/13/83 L'T 4 LT 5 025880/81 06/07/83 LT 2 LT 2 025660/61 06/10/83 LT 2 LT 2 026020/21 06/24/S3 LT 2 LT 2 026460/61 06/21/83 LT 1.4 2.2 + 1.3 027680/81 07/15/83 LT 1.9 LT 1.4 027200/01 '7/18/83 LT 3 LT 3 027700/01 07/18/83 LT 0.8 LT 1.1 027780/81 08/18/83* 1.5 + 1.1 LT 2 027800/01 07/28/83 LT 1.5 LT 1.8 027920/21 08/22/83* LT 3 LT 3 028240/41 07/13/83 .93 + .72 LT 2 028260/61 08/25/83 ll +3 13 + 3 028980/81 08/29/83 LT 4 LT 4 028660/61 08/31/83 LT 1.6 LT 1.6 029620/21 09/22/83 13 + 2 12 + 2 029880/81 09/19/83 LT 3 LT 3 030160/61 10/19/83 LT 5 LT 5 031300/01 10/18/83 LT 4 LT 4 032040/41 12/07/83 3.9 + 2.6 2.5 + 2.4

• date received, collection date not given '

LT = Less Than 5-68

A"2 GROSS ALPHA IH MATER (Page 2 of 2)

NlJS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 BLANKS SPIKES AND REFERENCE ANALYSIS Col lee ti on Expected Resul t Reported Result Date + 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/1) 02/15/83 0.0 LT 1 02/15/83 5.0 + 0.6 7..4 + 1.0 03/12/83 100 + 10 62+ 1~")

1 04/14/83 '3200 + 400 3200 + 400 04/14/83 5800 + 600 6300'+ 700 04/20/83 100 + 10 99 + 10 05/26/83 1.0 + 0.2 1.0 + 0.2 05/26/83 3200 + 400 3200 + 400 09/05/83 0.0 LT .7 I

09/05/83 28+ 3 27 + 2 09/05/83 *280 + 30 240 + 30 LT Less Than (1) No unequivocal cause for discrepancy could be established. The discrepancy is presumed to be analyst error.

(2) Indicates reagent blank, 5-69

B"1 GROSS BETA ON AIR PARTICULATE FILTER (Page 1 of 8)

NUS Ra di ol ogi cal Labora tory Internal equality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

. Result 81 Result 82 NUS ID8 Collection Date + 2s (E-03 pCi/m3 ) + 2s (E-03 pCi/m )

023240/41 Ol/01/83 27+ 7 27 + 7 023280/81 01/04/83 23 + 7 23+ 7 023300/01 01/04/83 16+ 5 19 + 5 023320/21 01/04/83 31 + 6 31 + 6 023400/01 01/11/83 20 + 7 17+ 7 023420/21 01/11/83 44 + 6 42 + 6 023460/61 01/12/83 13 + .5 13 + 5 023480/81 01/15/83 15+ 7 ~

18 + 7 023500/01 01/18/83 76 + 47 91 + 49 023540/41 01/18/83 16 + 6 15'+ 6 023580/81 01/22/83 19 + 7 14 + 6 023620/21 01/28/83 LT 8 'LT7 023640/41 01/25/83 16 + 6 18 + 6 023660/61 01/25/83 29+ 6 34 + 6

. 023760/61 02/02/83 7.5' .6.2 13 + 6 023800/01 02/01/83, 29 + 5 29+ 6 023880/81 '2/08/83 29 + 5 25 + 5 023960/61 02/15/83 30 + 6 24 + 5 024020/21 02/22/83 24.+ 5 19+ 5 024060/61 02/22/83 LT 11 LT ll 024080/81 02/22/83 28+ 7 16 + 7 LT = Less Than t ff%R \Av ff Wg<H P bP ~ ~C ~

B.-l GROSS BETA ON AIR PARTICULATE FILTER (Page 2 of 8)

NllS Radiological Laboratory

~ Internal (}uality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 81 3

Result 02 NUS ID8 Collection Date + 2s (E-03 pCi/m3) + 2s (E-03 pCi/m )

024100/01 02/26/83 16 + 8 9.3 + 7.6 024140/41 03/01/83 20 + 5 20 + 5 024200/01 , 03/01/83 14 + 7 10 + 7 024220/21 03/05/83 24+ 7 24 + 7 024240/41 03/08/83 21 + 7 12 + ~

7 024300/01 03/10/83 LT g LT 10 024320/21 03/12/83 12 '+ 5 8 + 7 024340/41" 03/18/83 14+ 4 16 + 5 024360/61 03/16/83 22+7 21 + 7 024380/81 03/18/83 15+ 7 13 + 6 024420/21 03/15/83 22 + 5 25+ 6 024460/61 03/22/83 7.2 + 6.1 LT 10

'24480/81 ~ 03/23/83 10 + 5 14+ 4 024500/01 03/26/83 20 + 7 21 + 8 024560/61 03/30/83 6.7 + 5.7 5.7 + 5.7 024620/21 04/03/83 13 + 6 15 + 6 024640/41 03/30/83 19 + 4 19+ 4 024660/61 04/06/83 12 + 6 8.3 + 5.9 024680/81 04/05/83 15 + 6 17+ 6 LT Less Than 5-71

u

. B-,l GROSS BETA OH AIR PARTICULATE FILTER (Page 3 of 8)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE AHALYSIS Result 81 Result 82 HUS IDP Collection Date + 2s (E-03 pCi/m3 ) + 2s (E-03 pCi/m )

024700/01 04/06/83 16 + 5 13 + 5 024840/41 04/13/83 24 + 5 23 + 5 u

~u ~

024860/61 04/12/83 LT 9 LT 9 024880/81 04/16/83 12+ 6 13 + 6 024900/01 04/19/83 LT 8 LT 8 024920/21 04/19'/83 15 + 7 8.2 + 6.4 024940/41 04/20/83 18 + ;22+5

0 5

024960/61 04/23/83 15 + 7 8.7 + 6.8 024980/81 04/26/83 9.6 + 6.4 Il + 7 025040/41 04/27/83 23 + 5 23.+ 5 025080/81 04/30/83 12 + 6 8.1 + 6.7 025120/21 05/03/83 18 + 5 19 + 5 025140/41 05/03/83 14 + 6 87 + 65 025160/61 05/04/83 20 + 6 31 + 6 025200/01 05/06/83 LT 20 LT 30 025220/21 05/10/83 17 + 7 13+ 6 025260/61 05/11/83 21 + 5 19 + 5 025280/81 05/14/83 15 + 6 17 + 6 025300/01 05/17/83 25 + 6 25 + 6 LT = Less Than 5-72

.u>>u>>uuu>>u~~~>> ~u ruu>>. w:uu, >>uu>>Wu '":uu u'>>'.'...>>>>ur . r'

~ ~

~*

B"1 GROSS BETA ON AIR PARTICULATE FILTER (Page 4 of 8)

NUS Ra di ol ogi ca 1 Lab ora tory

'nternal ()uality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 01 Result f2 NUS IDF Collection Date + 2s (E-03 pCi/m3 ) + 2s (E-03 pCi/m )

025340/41 05/18/83 19+ 5 18+ 5 025380/81 05/21/83 9.1 + 6.1 10+ 6 025420/21 05/24/83 7 4 + 5 3 LT 8 025440/41 05/24/83 11 + 12 + 6 025480/81 05/25/83 14+ 4 14 + 4 025560/61 05/31/83 LT 10 8.8 + 6.3 025580/81 06/01/83 LT 8 6.5 + 5.0 025600/01 06/01/83 12 + 3 15 + 3 025680/81 06/08/83 LT 9 9.2 + 5.7 025700/01 06/07/83 22 + 5 13 + 5 025740/41 06/11/83 18 + 7 12 + 6 025780/81 06/14/83 17 + 8 18 + 7 025800/01 " 06/14/83 13 + 6 10 + 6 025900/01 06/15/83 23+ 5 21 + 5 025980/81 06/21/83 24+ 6 20 + 7 026000/Ol 06/22/83 18+ 6 18 + 6 026080/81 06/22/83 76 + 53 13+ 5 026160/61 06/28/83 72 + 10 73 + 10 026200/01 06/28/83 66 + 61 ll + 6 LT = Less Than 5-73

B"1 GROSS BETA ON AIR PARTICULATE FILTER (Page 5 of 8)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal (}uality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result fl

+ 2s (E-03 pCi/m3 )

Result 82

+ 2s (E-03 pCi/m )

3 NUS ID8 Collection Date 026300/01 07/05/83 10 + 6 8.5 + 6.1 026320/21. 07/05583 LT 5 LT 5 026340/41'- 07/06/83 ~ ll 5 9.8 + 5.1 026480/81 07/06/83 21 + 5 20 + 5 026420/21 07/06/83 12 + 3 9.1 + 2.4 026520/21 07/11/83 8.2 + 3.4 9.9 + .3. 6 026560/61 07/13/83 10 5 ll + 6 026580/81 07/13/83 11 + 5 7.5 + 4.6 026640/41 07/14/03 9,8 + 3 10 + 3 026660/61 07/18/83 3.8 + 3.0 5.4 + 2.9 026740/41 07/16/83 19 + 7 17 + 7 026760/61 07/19/83 35 + 8 34 + 8 026820/21 07/21/83 18 + 4 21 + 4 026860/61 07/20/83 16 + 5 15 + 5 026960/61 07/25/83 15 + 3 12 + 3 027020/21 07/26/83 12 + 7 17 + 7 027040/41- 07/26/83 17 + 7 15+ 7 027180/81 07/29/83 10 + 3 15 + 3 027260/61 07/26/83 26 + 7 19 + 7 LT = Less Than 5-74

B-1 GROSS BETA ON AIR PARTICULATE FILTER (Page 6 of 8)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal ()uality Conti ol Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

'US Result 81 Result f2 IDO Collection Date + 2s (E-03 pCi/m3 ) + 2s (E-03 pCi/m3 )

027220/21 08/01/83 12 + 3 12 + 3 027260/61 08/02/83 26 + 7 19+ 7 027280/81 08/02/83 29 + 6 30 + 6 027300/01 08/02/83 9.1 + 6.0 6.4 + 5.8 027360/61 08/04/83 15 + 4 23 + 4 027480/81 08/06/83 19+ 7 13 + 6 027500/01 08/08/83 16 + 4 16 + 4 027580/81 08/09/83 LT 9 5.7 + 5.7 027600/01 08/09/83 24 + 7 23 + 7 027720/21 08/11/83 19 + 3 18 + 3.

027760/61 08/15/83 12 + 3 17 + 4 027820/21 08/16/83 11 + 6 7.8 + 6.1 027840/41'27880/81 08/17/83 86 + 30 6.5 + 2.7 08/17/83 14+ 6 6.8 + 5.0 027900/01 08/17/83 21 + 5 19+ 5 028040/41 08/22/83 16 + 4 17 + 4 028140/41 08/23/83 39 + 9 38 + 9 028200/01 08/25/83 17 + 3 19 + 3 028300/01 08/27/83 16 + 7'2 16+ 7 028320/21 08/30/83 + 6 18+ 6 LT = Less Than 5-75

B-1 GROSS BETA ON AIR PARTICULATE FILTER (Page 7 of 8)

HUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 813 . '.Result d2 3 NUS ID8 Collection Date + 2s (E-03 pCi/m ) + 2s (E-03 pCi/m )

I 028340/41 08/29/83 18 + 18+ 4 028380/81 08/30/83 29 + -7 21 + 6 028460/61 09/01/83 16 + 3 19 + 3 028480/81 08/31/83 17 + 4 18+ 5 028500/01 09/03/83 11 + 7 19+ 7 028620/21 09/07/83 '37 + 6 37 + 6=

028820/21 09/12/83 14 + 4 12 + 4

'28920/21 09/14/83 23 5 .19 + 5 028960/61 09/14/83 17 + 5 16 +'

029080/81 09/20/83 '23 + 7 21 + 7 029100/01 09/19/83 18 + 4 15 + 4 029180/81 09/21/83 25 + 5 20 + 5 029420/21 09/28/83 37 + 6 32 + 4 029740/41 10/05/83 34 36 + 4 029760/61 10/08/83 68 9 70 + 9 029780/81 10/03/83 18 + 4 17 + 4 029820/21 10/08/83 1.8 + 4 16 + 4 029920/21 10/11/83 15 4 13+ 4 029960/61 10/12/83 39 + 42 + 4 LT = Less Than 5-76

4 B "1 GROSS BFTA ON AIR PARTICULATE FILTER

~

(Page 8 of 8)

HUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 813 Result 82 NUS IDf Collection Date + 2s (E-03 pCi/m ) + 2s (E"03 pCi/m3 )

030100/Ol 10/10/83 14 + 3 12+ 3 030120/21 10/15/83 8.2 + 2.5 96 + 26 030260/61 10/18/83 + 5 20 + 5.

030280/81 10/19/83 18 + 5 21+ 5 030300/01 10/18/83 LT 8 LT 8 030360/61 10/22/83 11 + 2 11 + 2 030380/81 10/23/83 .18 + 5 14 + 4 030600/01 10/24/83 19 + 3. 17 + 3 030620/21 10/29/83 3.4 + 1.9 6.1 + 1 030754 10/31/83 22 + 3 19+ 3 030780/81 11/02/83 18 + 5 19 + 5 030840/41 11/05/83 7.8 + 1.9 6.6 + 1.9 030940/41 11/08/83 10 + 3 15 + 4 031280/81 11/12/83 9.2 + 2.0 10+ 2 031360/61 11/16/83 17 + 5 21 + 5 031440/41 11/07/83 6.9 + 2 ' 8.1 + 2.2 031500/01 11/19/83 16 + 6 20+ 6 031640/41 11/22/83 3.8 + 3.1 5.5 + 3.1 031760/61 11/28/83 8.0 + 2+3 9.7 + 2.2 LT = Less Than 5-77

B-2 GROSS BETA IN WATER NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal Quality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 81 Result 82 HUS IDO Collection Date + 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/1) 022820/21 12/14/83 LT 6 LT 6 022860/61 01/15/83 . LT 2 2.3 + 1.4 023120/21 01/23/83 LT 2 LT 2 023200/01 01/25/83 1.5 + 1.4 3.8 + 1.3 024120/21 02/28/83 2.7 + 1.3 3.4 + 1.4 024440/41 04/13/83 2.3 + 1.5 LT 3 024520/21 03/19/83 (0.11 + 0.02)E06 (0.11 + 0.02)E06 024540/41 03/28/83 3.2 + 1.3 2 3 + 1.3

~

024600/Ol 03/31/83 3.1 + 1.4 4.3. + 1.5 025000/01 04/26/83 1.5 + 1.3 1.8 + 1.3 025020/21 04/16/83 (0.21 + 0.03)E06 (0.22 + 0.03)E06 05/21/83 2.1 + 1.4 1.9 + 1.4 025180/81'25500/01.

05/21/83 3700 + 400 3600 + 400 025520/21 05/28/83 6 8 + 1 4 4.6 +

025880/81 06/07/83 6.7 + 1.6 3.9 + 1.5 026120/21 06/27/83 3.2 + 1.4 3~9 + 1.5 026180/81 06/27/83 LT 2 LT 2 026460/61 06/21/83 2.2 + 1.4 4.9 + 1.5 027160/61 07/29/83 LT 15 LT 15 029620/21 09/22/83 16 + 2 18 + 2 030160/61 10/19/83 LT 8 LT 8 030200/01 10/17/83 3.2 + 1.4 3.8 + '.4 031220/21 11/10/83 ~

'LT 3 LT 2 031540/41 11/23/83 (2) 710 + 80 710 + 80 LT = Less Than (1) This result edited since previous report. Prior reports were 5-78 in error due to typo on original data.

. (2) Date received, collection date not given.

B"2 GROSS BETA IN MATER NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 REFERENCE SPIKES OR BLANK ANALYSIS Expected Result Reported Result Collection Date + 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/1) 03/12/83 520 + 52 520 + 60 04/20/83 520 + 52 490 + 50 04/28/83 520 + 52 525 + 60 05/26/83 . 5.2 .+ 0.5 5.1 + 0,6 LT = Less Than 5-79.

C"1 GAMMA SPECTROHETRY ON 'AIR PARTICULATE FILTER (COMPOSITE)

(Page 1 of 2)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal l}uality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result fl Result 82

+ 2s (E-03 pCi/m3 )

NUS ID8 'ollection Date Nucli des + 2s (E-03 pCi/m3 )

023380/81 01/04/83 Be-7 71 + 27 58 + 12 Ce-144 Ll 10 LT 3 Cs-134 LT 3 LT 0.8 Cs-137 LT 2 LT 0.8 Nb-95 LT 3 LT 0.7 Zr-95 LT 7 LT 0.7 024780/81 03/30/83 Se-7 . 58 + 13 45 + 12 Ce-144 Ll 4 LT 3 Cs-134 LT 1.2 LT 1.0 Cs-137 LT 1.0 LT 0.9 Nb-95 ~

LT 1.2 LT 1.1 Zr-95 LT 2 LT 2 024740/41 04/03/83 Be-7 47 "+ 18 49 + 18 Ce-144 L&6 LT 8 Cs-134 LT 2 LT 2 Cs-137 LT 2 LT 1.6 Nb"95 LT 2 LT 1.3 Zr-95 LT 3 LT 3 024760/61 04/05/83 Be-7 57'+ 15 54 + 15 Ce-144 LT 4 LT 5 Co"134 LT 1..4 LT 1.7 Cs"137 LT 1.2 LT 1.3 Nb"95 LT 1.7 LT 1.6

.- Zr-95 LT 3 LT.2 LT = Less Than 5-80

C-1 GAtSA SPECTROHETRY ON AIR PARTICULATE FILTER (COHPOSITE)

(Page 2 of 2)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal ()uality Control Pr ogram 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 81

+ 2s (E-03 pCi/m3 )

'esult f2

+ 2s (E-03 pCi/m3 )

NUS ID~ Collection Date Nuclides 025360/61 '05/11/83 Ba-140 LT 20 LT 40 Cs-134 ~ LT 4 LT 7 Cs-137 LT 5 LT 7 K-40 1300 + 200 1300 + 200 La-140 LT 12 LT 16

\

027100/01 07/06/83 Be-7 79 + 28 78 + 35 Ce-144 LT 11 'LT 15 Cs"134 5.4 + 2.2 4.8 + 2.3

.Cs-137 Nb-95 14 + 3 LT 4 18 + 5 LT 3 Ol Zr-95 LT 6 LT 8 027120/21 07/06/83 Be-7 37 + 33 LT 80 Ce-144 LT 12 LT 14 Cs-134 LT 4 LT 4 Cs-137 LT 4 LT 3 Nb"95 LT 5 LT 5 Zr-95 LT 10 LT 7

'9/26/83 030700/01 Be-7 79 + 20 61 + 21 Ce-144 LT 6 LT 6 Cs"134 LT 1.6 LT 1.9 Cs"137 LT 2 LT 1.9 Nb"95 LT 2 LT 3 Zr-95 LT 4 LT 5 030920/21 10/01/83 Be-7 42 + 14 48 + 14 Ce-144 LT 5 LT 6 Cs-134 LT 1.6 LT 1.3 Cs-137 LT 1.3 LT 1.6 Nb"95 LT 3 LT 2 Zr-95 LT 5 LT 4 LT = Less Than 5-81

C-1 GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OH AIR PARTICULATE FILTER NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 SPIKES OR BLIND ANALYSIS Expected Resul t Reported Resul t Collection Date Nucl i des + 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/1)

I 05/26/83 Co-57 14 + 2 17 + 13 Co-60 90 + 18 82 + 19 Cd-109 . 410 + 82 420 + 90 Ce-139 15 + 3 16 + 3 Cs"137 80 + 16 73 + 14 Hg-203 12 + 3 17 + 6 Sn-113 45 + 9 41 + 10 Sr-85 33 + 7 31+ 8 Y-88 88 + 18 87 + .14.

LT Less Than 5-82

~a ~k A -E l I

g l

8

j j

fg H

]

x" 1 d

'I V

q 0

'f

&V

C"2 GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF MILK (Page 1 of 4)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Col lee ti on Result 81 Result f2 NUS IOi bate Nucl ides + 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/l) 023560/61 01/18/83 Ba-140 LT 30 LT 30 Cs"134 LT 9 LT 10 Cs-137 LT 8 LT 10 K-40 1300 + 200 1200 + 200 La-140 LT 15 LT 11 024720/21 04/11/83 Ba-140 . LT 20 LT 17 Cs-134 LT 9 LT 6 Cs"137 LT 10 LT 8

'-40 1800 + 200 1600 + 200 La-140 LT 12 LT 10 025460/61 05/25/83 Ba"140 LT 19 LT 20 Cs"134 LT 5 LT 5 Cs"137 L'T:5 LT 6 K"40 1400+ 200 1400 + 200 La-140 ,LT 8 LT 11 LT = Less Than

,'5-83 l% I F 6 tP I', +p'%t9h I Pl v dll Qp 7A

~ 4\ Al v I \ %P'4l 'l4 4k f ~

C-2 GAHHA SPECTROHETRY OF HILK i (Page 2 of 4)

NUS Ra di ol ogi ca 1 Laboratory

~

I Internal equality Control Program 1983 OUPLECATE ANALYSIS Collection Result fl Result P2

+ Zs NUS IOd Oate Nuclides + 2s (pCi/1) (pCi/1) 026980/81 07/25/83 Ba-140 LT 30 LT 40 Cs-134 LT 5 LT 6 Cs"137 LT 5 LT 7 K"40 1700 + 200 1600 + 200 La-140 ~

LT 15 LT 15 027740/41 as/12/83 Ba-140 LT 30 LT 30 Cs-134 LT 7 LT 6 Cs"137 LT 9 LT 8 K "40 1700 + 200 1500 + 200 La-140 LT 14 LT 14 026100/01. 06/27/S3 Ba"140 LT 90 LT 40

'o-58 LT 3 LT 3 Co-60 LT 1.9 LT 1.9 Cs-134 LT 1.4 LT 1.4 Cs"137 1.7 + 0.8 LT 1.6 Fe-59 LT '10 LT 7 K"40 1500 + 200 1700 + 200 La-140 LT 30 LT 20 Hn-54 LT 1.7 LT 1.7 Nb"95 LT 3 LT 2 Zn-65 LT 5 LT 5 Zr-95 LT 5 LT 4 LT = Less Than 5-84

AA ,.4 4 ~

C-2 GAMJJA SPECTROMETRY OF MILK

('age 3 of 4)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal (}uality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Collection Result 81 Result 82 NUS ID8 Date Nuclides + 2s (pCi/l) + 2s (pCi/1) 027980/81 08/22/83 Ba-140 LT 60 LT'10 Co-.58 LT 1.8 LT 3 Co-60 LT 1.4 LT 2 Cs-134 LT 0.9 LT 1.6 Cs-137 1.8 + 0.6 2.6 + 1.0

. Fe-59 LT 7 LT ll K-40 1200 + 200 1300 + 200 La-140 LT 30, LT 50 Mn-54 LT 1.2 LT 2 Nb"95 LT 3 LT 6 Zn-65 LT 4 LT 6 Zr-95... LT 3 LT,6 028280/81 08/27/83 ea-140 LT 70 LT 90

I

4 Cs"134 LT 1.2 LT 1.3 Cs-137 LT 1.4 .LT 1.5 K-40 1100 + 200 1100 + 200 La-140 LT 300 LT 40 LT = Less Than 4

5-85 r 4'v>>t '4444r 44,Art 'r tr 4 pr,t rAA , 4 4 rtt 4 *t t*w 44

~

• r ,; tat ~ << ~ rt 4~ .,A ~ t r,

• rt";,4 ...g, r*~ r A ..g ~ ~

C-2 GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF MILK (Page 4 of, 4) equality NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Col 1 ec tion Result 81 Result 82 NUS ID8 Date . Nuclides + 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/1) 030680/81 10/31/83 Ba"140 LT 20 LT 40 Cs"134 LT 2 LT 4 Cs"137 1.6 + 1.3 LT 4 K-40 1700 + 200 2000 + 200 La"140 LT 11 LT 19 II 031740/41 ll/28/83 Ba-140 LT'30 LT 40 Cs-134 LT 5 LT 6 Cs-137 LT 6 LT 8 K"40 '700 + 200 1700 + 200 La-140 LT 13 LT 20 LT ~ Less Than 5-86

C"3 GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF MATER (Page 1 of 16)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 t

t DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 81 'Result 82 NUS IDS Collection Date Nuclides + 2s (pCi/l) + 2s (pCi/1) i 023860/61 01/31/83 Ba"140 LT 40 LT 40 Co-58 LT 7 LT 10 Co-60 LT 7 LT. 9 Cs-134 LT 7 LT 8 4

Cs"137 LT 7 LT 7 Fe-59 LT 16 LT 19 La" 140 LT 16 LT 20 Mn-54 LT 6 LT 8 Nb-95 LT7'T LT 8 Zn-65 15 LT 20 Zr-95 LT 13 LT 14 024040/41 ~

02/21/83 Ba-140 LT 30 LT 20 Co-58 LT 11 LT 7 Co-60 LT 11 LT 8 Cs-134 LT 10 LT 7 Cs-137 Fe-59 LT LT 20 ll LT LT 7

13" La-140 LT 13 LT 10 Mn-54. LT'10 LT 7 Nb"95 Zn-65 LT LT 30 ll LT LT 6

15 Zr-95 LT 20 LT 12 LT ~ Less Than 5-87 Wt tt4f\WW tWWttttttttttt, tt ttlPVtlt t,tt t t tl W 'tW Wt ft W g W ~ t t tt t, I: t t, 0 t ~ W W WW Pt fl tt t ttt I ~t t <<ttWY k t t t ttttttWW

0-3 GAM/'N SPECTROMETRY OF MATER (Page 2. of 16)

HUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 0'US DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Yg Result 81 Result 82 ID8 Collection Date Huclides + 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/1) 024,120/21 02/28/83 Ba-140 LT 30 LT 10 Co-58 LT 9 LT 4 Co-60 LT

~ Co-134 'T LT 7 10 LT 6

3 Cs-137 Fe-59 LT ll LT, 4 La-140 LT 17 LT 12 'T LT 9 8'T 51n-54 LT 10 4 Hb"95 LT 10 LT 4 Zn-65 LT 17. LT 10 Zr-95 LT 18 LT 7 024400/01 03/16/83 Ba"140 LT 12 LT 13 Co-58 LT 4 LT 4 Co-60 LT 5 LT 5 Cs"134 LT 4." LT- 6 Cs-137 LT 5 LT 5 Fe-59 LT 11 LT 10

~

La-140 LT 6 LT 7

~

Hn-54 LT 4 LT 5 Hb-95 LT 4 LT 4 Zn-65 Zr-95 LT Il LT 10 LT 7 LT 9 LT . Less Than 5-88

C"3 GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF MATER (Page 3 of 16)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result fl Result 02

+ 2s (pCi/1)

NUS ID8 Collection Date Nuclides + 2s (pCi/1) 024580/81 03/2P/83 Ba-140 LT 30 ~

U 14(1)

Co-58 LT 7 LT 5 Co-60 LT 6 LT 5 Cs"134 LT 6 LT 4 Cs-137 LT 5 LT 5 Fe-59 LT 12 LT 8 La-140 LT 14 LT J.l Mn-54 LT 5 LT 4 Nb-95 LT 5 LT 5 Zn-65 LT 14 LT 11 Zr-95 LT -12 LT 9 024540/41 .. 03/28/83 Ba-140 LT 16 LT 20 h Co<<58 LT 5 LT 5 Co-60 .LT 6 LT 5 Cs-134 LT 6 LT 5 Cs-137 LT 6 LT 6 Fe-59 LT 10- LT 12 La-140 LT 9 LT 10 Mn-54 LT 6 LT 5 Hb-95 LT 5 LT 5 Zn-65 LT 14 LT 12 Zr"95 LT 10 LT 10 LT Less Than (1) Result 82 was incorrectly stated on previous report(s).

5-89 1 IV~I l 4 ~ I'foal

C-3 GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF MATER (Page 4 of 16)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control'rogram 1983'UPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 81 Result 82 NUS IDt Collection Date Nuclides + 2s (pCi/l) + 2s (pCi/1) 024600/01 03/31/83 Ag-110M LT 5 LT 10 Sa-140 LT 19 LT 40 8e-7 LT 4 LT 9 Ce-141 Lj 11 LT 20 Co"58 LT 7 LT 10 Co-60 LT 7 LT 10 Cr-51 LT 50 LT 90 Cs"134 LT 7 Lj 10 Cs-136 Lj 8 Lj 12.

Cs-137 LT 6.. LT 9 Fe-59 LT 16 LT 20 I-131 Lj 8 Lj 16 I-133 LT 300 Lj 600 K "40 LT 80 LT 90 La-140 LT 11 LT 17 Mn-54 LT 7 LT 10

. Mo"99. LT 17 Lj 40, Na-22 LT 7 Lj 10 Nb-95 LT 6 LT 9 Ra-'226 LT 12 LT 30 Ru-103 LT 7 LT 11 Ru-106 Lj 60 LT 8 Sb-125 LT 13 LT 30 Te-129M LT 5 Lj 10 Te-132 LT 12 LT 30 Zn-65 LT 15 LT 20 Zr-95 LT 12 LT 18 LT = Less Than 5-90

C-3 GAWN SS ECTROYiETRY 0F MATER (Page 5 of 16)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 81 Result 82 NUS ID8 Collection Date Nuclides + 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/1) 025060/61 04/30/83 Ba-140 LT 14 LT 20 Co-58 LT 5 LT 7 Co-60 LT 8 LT 7 Cs-134 LT 5 LT 6 Cs-137 LT 4 LT 7 Fe-59 Lj 10 LT 14 La-140 LT 14 LT 9 t1n-54 LT'4 'T LT 6 Nb-95 4 LT 7 Zn-65 LT 13 LT 12 Zr-95 .LT8 LT .12 025240/41 05/aoC83 Ba-140 LT 20 LT 30 Co-58 LT 6 Lj 8 Co-60 LT 7 LT 9 Cs-134 LT 6 LT 8 Cs-137 LT 6 LT 8 Fe-.59- ~

LT 12 LT 16 La-140 . LT 11 LT 16 Nn-54 LT 6 LT 8 Nb"95 LT 6 LT 8 Zn-65 LT 12 LT 19 Zr-95 LT ll LT 15 LT Less Than 5-91 4V V 0 1 I0 Pt P l g% tV \ IVV l, 'll ' I 'f' l W V ~ VI '

C-3 GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF MATER (Page 6 of 16) equality NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 81 .Result 82 NUS I D8 Col l ecti on Date Nuclides + 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/l) 025521/22 05/28/83 Ba-140 LT 10 LT 1.5 Co-58 . LT 3 LT 5 Co-60 LT 3 LT 5 Cs"134 ~

LT 2 LT 4 Cs-137 LT 3 LT 5 Fe-59 LT 6 LT 9 La-140 LT 5 LT 8 Nn-54 . LT 3 LT 4 Nb"95 LT 3 LT 5 Zn-65 LT 6'T LT 9 Zr-95 5 LT 8 025540/41 05/25/83 Ba-l.40 LT 17 LT 80 Co-58 LT 3 LT 12 Co-60 LT 3 LT 12 Cs-134 LT 3 LT 11 Cs"137 LT 3 LT 11 Fe-59 LT 8 LT 30 K-40 270 + 50 260 70 La-140 LT 9 LT 30 Mn-54 LT 3 LT 11 Nb-95 LT 3 LT 13 Zn-65 LT 7 LT 30 Zr-95 LT 6 LT 20 026120/21 06/27/83 Ba-140 LT 9 LT 9 Co-58 LT 2 LT 1.5 Co-60 LT 2 LT 2 Cs"134 LT 2 LT 2 Cs-137 LT 1.1 LT 1.0 Fe-59 LT 5 LT 4 La" 140 LT 11 LT 12 Mn-.54 LT 1.3 LT 1.3 Nb"95 LT 1.4 LT 1.4 Zn-65 LT 4 LT 4 Zr-95 LT 3 LT 3 LT = Less Than 5-92

C"3 GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF WATER (Page 7 of 16)

NVS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS t

Resul 81 Result 82 NUS IDO Collection Date Nuclides + 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/l) 026140/41 06/25/83 Ba-140 LT 8 LT 10 Co-58 LT 1.2 LT 1.4 Co-60 LT 1.8 LT 2 Cs-134 LT 3 LT 2 Cs"137 LT 0.8 LT 0.9 Fe-59 LT 4 LT 4 La-140 LT 10 LT 13 An-54 LT 0.9 LT 1.1 Nb"95 LT 1.1 LT 1.3 Zn-65 'LT 3 LT 3 Zr-95 LT 1.9. LT 2 026180/81 06/27/83 Ba-140 ~

LT 40 LT 7'T Co-58 LT.3 0.8 Co-60 LT 4 LT 1.4 C$ "134 LT 1.4 2.1 + 0.3 Cs"137 LT 1.7 LT 0.6 Fe-59 LT 10 LT 3 La-140 LT 50 LT. 11 Hn-54 LT 2 LT 0.6 Nb"95'n-65 LT 3 LT 0.8 LT 7 LT 2 Zr-95 LT 5 LT 1.4 I.T = Less'Than 5-93

C"3 GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF WATER (Page 8 of 16)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 0'US DUPLICATE ANALYSIS ID8 Collection Date Nucl i des Result <<1

+ 2s (pCi/1)

'esult(pCi/1)

+ 2s 82 026280/81 .06/30/83 Ag-110M LT 4 LT 5 Ba-140 LT 14 LT 30 Be-7 LT 8 LT 10 Ce-141 ~

LT 20 LT 30 Co-58 LT 7 LT 10 Co-60 LT 4 LT 5 Cr-51 LT 200 LT 300 Cs-134 LT 3 ~

LT 9000 Cs"136 LT 400 LT 3 E31 Cs-137 . LT 3 LT 500 Fe-59 LT 30 LT 4 I"131 LT 60000. LT 90000 I"133 LT 1.2 E31 LT 3 E31 K-40 LT 40 LT 50 La-140 LT 14 LT 30 Mn-54 LT 4 LT 5

, Mo-99 LT 9 EO9 LT 1.6 E16 Na-22 LT 4 LT 5 Nb-95 'LT7 LT 11 Ra-226 LT 30 LT 70 RU-103 LT 14 LT 18 Ru-106 LT 30 LT 40 Sb-125 LT 8 LT 11 Te-129M LT 16 LT 20 Te-132 LT 4 E08 LT 6 E08 Zn-65 Zr-95 LT LT 10 14 LT ll LT 20 LT = Less Than 5-94

t y C-3

.'GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF HATER (Page 9 of 16)

NUS Radiological Laboratory

~

. .':Internal equality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS NUS ID8 'uclides Collection Date I Result Pl

+ 2s (pCi/1)

Resul

+ 2s t '82 (pCi/1) 026720/21 ~

.07/06/83 Ba-140 LT 20 LT 16 Co-58 LT 5 LT 15 Co-60 LT 3 LT 8 Cs-134 LT 2 LT 7 Cs"137 LT 2 LT 8 Fe-59 LT 13 LT 50 La-140 LT 20 LT 16 Mn-54 LT 3 LT 9 Nb"95 LT 4 LT 16 Zn-65 LT 6 LT 19 Zr-95 ~ LT 8 LT 13 026620/21 07/15/83 Ba" 140 LT 9 LT 10 Co-58 LT 4 ~

LT 13 Co-60 LT 3 LT 8 Cs-134 LT 2 LT 7 Cs-137 LT 2 LT 8 Fe-59 LT 12 LT 40 La-140 . LT 9 LT 10 Mn-54 L'T 3 LT 9 Nb-95 'LT 4 LT 14 Zn-65 LT 6 LT 18 Zr-95 LT 7 LT 20 026880/81 07/21/83 Ba-140 LT 7 LT 9 Co-58 LT 9 LT 7 Co-60 LT 6 LT 6 Cs-134 LT 5 LT 5 Cs-137 LT 5 LT 5 Fe-59 LT 30 LT 20 K-40 LT 130 LT 90 La-140 LT 7 LT 9 Mn-54 LT 6 LT 5 Nb-95 LT 8 LT 9 Zn-65 LT 14 LT 12 Zr-95 LT 15 LT 15 LT = Less Than 5-95

C"3 GAtlMA SPECTROtlETRY OF WATER (Page 10 of 16) equality NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result fl Result 82

+ 2s NUS 108 Collection Date Nuclides + 2s (pCi/1) (pCi/1) 027140/41 . 07/30/83 Ba-140 .

LT 190 LT 150 Co-58 LT 7 LT 6 Co-60 LT 6 LT 4 Cs-134 LT 5 LT 4 Cs"137 LT 5 LT 4 Fe-59 LT 20 LT 17 K-40 LT 90 LT 60 La-140 LT 100 LT 90 Nn-54 IT 5 LT 4 Nb-95 ,

LT8 LT 6 Zn-65 LT 12 LT 9 Zr-95 LT 13 LT 11 027620/21 08/10/83 Ba-140 LT 80 LT 140 Co-58 LT 5 LT 7 Co-60 LT 4 LT 4 Cs-134 LT 4 LT 4 Cs"137 LT 4 ~

LT 4 Fe-59 LT 14 LT 16 K"40 LT 60 LT 50 La-140 LT 50 LT 70 Mn-54 LT 4 LT 5 Nb-95 LT 5 LT 6 Zn-65 LT 9 LT 9 Zr-95 LT 10 LT 11 LT = Less Than 5-96

C-3 GAHHA SPECTROHETRY OF WATER (Page ll of 16) equality NUS Ra di ol o gi ca 1 Labora tory Internal Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 81 Result 82 NUS Ibk Collection Date Nucli des + 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/1) 028000/01 08/22/83 Ba" 140 LT 30 LT 30 Co-58 LT 1.6 LT 1.6 Co-60 LT 1.3 LT 1.3 Cs-134 LT 1.1 LT 1.1 Cs-137 LT 1.1 LT 1.1 Fe-59 LT 4 LT 4 K"40 LT 12 LT 12 La-140 LT 15 LT 15

.Hn-54 LT 1.2 LT 1.2 Nb"95 LT 1:7 LT 1.7 Zn-65 'LT3 LT 3 Zr-95 LT 3 'LT3 02S7SO/81 09/14/83 Ba-140 LT 190 LT 150 Co-58 LT 8 LT 5 Co-60 LT 6 LT 4 Cs"134 LT 5 LT 3.

Cs"137 LT 5 LT 4 Fe-59 LT 20 LT 14 La-140 LT 90 ~ LT 80 Hn-54 LT 6 LT 4 Nb"95 LT 9 LT 6 Zn-65 LT 12 LT 9.

Zr-95 LT 14 LT 10 LT = Less Than 5-97

C-3 GAHt/A SPECTROl1ETRY- OF MATER I

(Page 12 of 16)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal l}uality Conti ol Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 81 Resul t 0'2 NUS ID8 Collection Date Nuclides + Zs (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/1) 029000/01 09/19/83 Ba" 140 LT 60 LT 60 Co-58 LT 3'T LT 3 Co-60 2 LT 2 ~

Cr-51 LT 40 LT 40 Cs-134 LT 2 Lj 2 Cs-137 LT 2 LT 2 Fe-59 LT 8 LT 8 K-40 HOT DETECTED LT 5 La-140 LT 40 LT 40 Nn-54 ~

LT 2 LT 2 Nb"95 LT 3 LT 3 Zn-65 LT 5 LT 5 Zr-95 LT 5 LT 5 029160/61 09/21/83 Ba-140 LT 190 LT 190 Co-58 LT 3 LT 3 Co-60 LT 1.6 LT 1.6 Cs"134 LT 1.5 LT 1.5 Cs"137 LT 1.5 LT 1.5 Fe-59 LT 9 LT 9 K-40 LT 19 LT 19 La"140 LT 110 LT 110 Nn-54 LT 1.7 LT 1.7 Nb-95 LT 3 LT 3 Zn-65 LT 4 LT 4 Zr-95 LT 5 LT 5 LT = Less Than 5-98

C-3 GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF MATER (Page 13 of 16)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal l}uality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 81 Result 82 NUS IDk Collection Date Nucli des + 2s (pCi/l) + 2s (pCi/l) 029200/01 09/24/83 ea-146 LT 200 LT 200 Co-58 LT 5 LT 5 Co-60  : LT 3 LT 3 Cs"134 LT 3 LT3" Cs"137 LT 3 LT 2 Fe-59 LT 15 ~

LT 14 La-140 LT 120 ,LT 120 Mn-54 LT 3 LT 3 Nb-95 LT 5 LT 5 Zn-65 LT 7 LT 7 Zr-95 . LT 9 LT 9 029940/41 10/12/83 8a-140 LT 170 LT 170 Co-58 LT 3 LT 3 Co-60 LT 2 LT 2 Cs-134 LT 1.9 LT 1.9

's-137 LT 2 LT 2 Fe-59 LT 10 LT 10 K-40 LT 20 LT 20

. La-140 LT 100. LT 100 Mn-54 LT 2 LT 2 Nb"95 LT 4 LT 4 Zn-65 LT 5 LT 5 Zr-95 L'T 6 LT 6 030500/01 10/26/83 Co-60 22 + 10 29+'+ 9 Cs-137 15 + 7 17 6 LT = Less Than 5-99

C-3 GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF MATER (Page 14 of 16)

NUS Radio]ogical Laboratory Internal ()uality Control Program.

1983 SPIKES OR BLIND ANALYSIS Expected Resul t Reported Result Collection Oate Nuclides + 2s (pCi/lit) + 2s (pCi/lit) 03/14/83 Cd"109 1000 + 200 1300 + 400 Ce-139 47 + 5 ~

46 + 10 Co-57 ~

38 + 4 49 + 11 Co-60 204 + 21 210 + 30 Cs-134 176 + 18 180 + 20.

Cs-137 178 + 18 190 + 20 Hg-203 81 + 9 110 + 20 Sn-113 ~ 155 + 16 140 + 20 Sr-85 158 + 16 160 + 20 Y-88 313 + 32 290 + 40 04/14/83 Cd-109 1400 + 140 1100 + 400 Ce-139 60 + 6 45 + 12 Co"57 53 + 5 45 + 9 Co-60 300 + 30 280 + 30 Cs-137 268 + 27 260 + 30 Hg-203 78 + 18 75 + 24 Sn-113 194 + 19 170 + 20 Sr-85 171 + 17 160 + 20 Y-88 385 + 40 420 + 60 LT = Less Than 5-100

~ C C"3 4RMNA SPECTROMETRY OF HATER (Page 15 of 16) h

--'." . NUS Radiological Laboratory Interna'1 equality Control Program 1983 SPIKES OR BLIND ANALYSIS Expected Result Reported Result Col lectiog'ate Nuclides + 2s (pCi/lit) + 2s (pCi/lit) 05/24/83 Co-57 28 + 6 26 + 8 Co-60 180 '+ 36 190 + 30 Cd-109 800 + 160 980 + 380 Ce-139 29"' 6 25 + 8 Cs"137 . 160 + 32 160 + 20 MG"203 25 + 5 19 + 9 Sn-113 90 + 18 91 + 17 Sr-85 66 + 13 66 + 13 Y-88 170 + 34 140 + 30 05/24/83 Ba-140 0.0 LT 14 Co-58 0.0 LT 2 Co-60 0.0 LT 2 Cs-134 0.0 LT 2 Cs-137 0.0 LT 2 Fe-59 0.0 LT 5 La-'140 0.0 LT 6 l1n-54 0.0 LT 2 Nb-95 0.0 LT 2 Zn-65 0.0 LT 4 Zr-95 0.0 LT 4 LT = Less Than 5-101

'b 4 gyal4' > C A<<RVkj' ~ C '6 A

'4 fo q ~~

C-3 GAMIN SPECTROMETRY OF HATER (Page 16 of 16)

HUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 SPIKES .OR BLIHD AHALYSIS Expected Result Reported Result Co ll ec ti on Da te . Huclides + 2s (pCi/lit) + 2s (pCi/lit) 05/27/83 Co-57 18 + 19+ 6 Co-60 110 + 20 99 + 15 Cd-109 510 + 110 360 + 190 Ce-139 18 + 14+ 6 Cs"137 100 + 20 84. +'2 Hg-203 15 + 3 LT 13

~

Sn-113 56 + 12 44 + 10 Sr-85 40 + 8 52 + -10 Y"88 110 + 20 120 + 20 LT = Less Than 5-102

C-4 GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF SOLIDS (dry)

(Page 1 of 7)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 81 Result 82 NUS IDP Collection Date Nucl i des + 2s (pCi/kg) + 2s (pCi/kg) 025620/21 05/03/83 Ac-228 830 + .200 780 + 280 Bi"214 880 + 130 690 + 170 Cs-134 LT 100 LT 140 Cs-137 , 180 + 50 160 + 80

'"40 19000 '+ 2000 17000 + 2000 Pb-212 710 + 80 550 + 90 Pb-214 850 + 130 740 + 140 Ra-226 860 + 130 720 + 150 Tl-208 800 +. 160'T 880 + 220 026500/01 07/12/83 Be-7 40 LT 50, Cs"134 LT 5 LT 5 Cs"137 LT 5 LT 5 I"131 LT 9 LT 19 K-40 2100 + 300 2300 + 300 o

024180/81 01/21/83 Co-58 LT 90 LT 70 Co-60 LT 60 LT 50 Cs"134 LT 50 LT 50 Cs-137 LT 60 LT 50 Fe-59 LT 300 LT 200, K-40 1400 + 500 1300 + 300 Mn-54 LT 70 LT 50

'.Zn-65 LT 170 LT 130 LT = Less Than 5>>103

.5 C"4

I GAM1A SPECTROMETRY OF SOLIDS (wet)

(Page 2 of 7)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program

~

1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 81 Result 82 NUS ID8 Collection Date Nuclides + 2s (pCi/kg) + 2s (pCi/kg) 025760/61 05/27/83 Co-58 Lj 50 Lj 60 Co-60 LT 50 LT 50 Cs"134 LT 40 Lj 40 Cs-137 56 + 28 81 + 30 Fe-59 Lj 190 Lj 200 K"40 3500 '+ 700 4600 . + 700

.Mn-54; LT 50 LT .40 Zn-65 LT 110 Lj 120 025940/41 '6/10/83 Co-58 LT 40 LT 50 .

3

'o-60 LT 30 LT 30, Cs"134 LT 20 LT 30 Cs-137 Lj 30 LT'0 Fe-59 LT 150 LT 150 K"40 3200 + 500 2600 + 600 Mn-54 LT 30 LT 40 Zn-65 Lj 70 LT 90 I

025400/01 05/24/83 Co-58 LT 19 LT 15 Co-60 LT 19 LT '18 Cs-134 LT 16 LT 13 Cs-137 30 + 12 38 + 10 Fe-59 LT 70 LT 13 K"40 3100 + 400 3400 + 400 Mn-54 LT 17 LT 50 Zn"65 Lj 50 LT 15 LT = Less Than 5-104

C-4 GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF SOLIDS (wet)

(Page 3 of 7) IV 4

(,- ~ NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 81 Result 82 NUS ID8 Collection Date Nucli'de's

' '+ 2s (pCi/kg) + 2s (pCi/kg)

~ ~

027000/01 . 07/25/83 Ag-110M  :, LT. 50 LT 60 I Ba-140 ~ -LT. 120 LT 120'T Be-7 ~ LT 40 40 Ce-141 Lj 50 Lj 60 Co-58 LT 50 Lj 60 Co-60 LT 60 Lj 70,'T Cr-51 LT 400. 400

' Cs-134's"136

.Cs"137 Lj 50 LT 36 LT 50, LT 50 Lj 70 LT 60 Fe-59 Lj 110 LT 110 I'-131 LT 50 .LT 50 I"133 LT 600 LT 600 K-40 2900 + 700 2900 +"800 La"140 Lj 80 LT 60 Mn-54 Lj 50 Lj'50 Mo-99 ~

LT 60 LT 100 Na"22 LT 70 Lj 70

'Nb"95 LT 50 LT 50 Ra-226 LT 700 LT 1000 RU-103 LT 50 LT 50 Ru"106 LT 400 LT 500 Sb"125 LT 120 LT 120 Te-129M LT'0 LT 40 Te-132 Lj 60 LT 90 Zn"65 Lj 140 LT 120 Zr-95 LT 100 LT 100 LT = Less Than 5-105

C-4 GAhlMA SPECTROMETRY OF SOLIDS (wet)

(Page 4. of 7)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal l}uality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE'HALYSIS Result fl Result 82 NUS ID8 Collection Date Ruclides + 2s (pCi/kg) + 2s (pCi/kg) 027060/61 07/26/83 Be-7 500 + 90 470. + 140.

Cs".134 Lf 12 LT 20 Cs-137 LT 14 LT 20 I-131 LT 40 LT 60 K-40 6800 + 700 7200 + 800 027860/61 08/18/83 Cs-134 LT 60 LT 40 Cs-137 LT 70 LT 40 I"131 LT'0 LT 40 K "40 '1800 + 500 2000 + 400 027940/41 08/15/83 Cs"134 LT 11 LT 15 Cs-137 LT 14 LT 17 I"131 LT 30 LT 30 K-40 2400 + 300 2400 + 300 029380/81 08/26/83 Co-58 LT 60 LT 20 Co-60 LT 50 LT 16 Cs"134 LT 40 16 + 5 Cs-137 LT 40 38 + 8 Fe-59 LT 200 LT 80 K"40 1300 + 300 1100 + 200 Mn-54 LT 40 LT 12 Zn-65 LT 90 LT 30 LT = Less Than 5-106

C"4 GAHHA SPECTROHETRY 'OF SOLIDS (wet)

(Page 5. of 7)

NUS Radiolog ical Laboratory Internal (}uality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS C

Result 81 '

Result 82. .:,'

NUS ID~ Collection Date Nuclides 2s (pCi/kg) 2s (pCi/kg)

V 028520/21 09/01/83 Cs"134 LT 4 LT 2 Cs"137 LT 4 LT 2 I"131 LT 9 LT 10 K-40 1200 + 200 a2oo + 2oo 028940/41 09/13/83 Cs"134 LT 14 LT 18

.Cs-137 LT 13 ~ LT 19 I"131 Lj 30 LT 40 K-'40 2200 . + 300 2200 + 400 029240/41 09/24/83 Cs-134 LT 40 Lj .40 Cs-137.

I-131 LT 40 Lj 60 'TLT 50 60

'-40 2900 + 500 3600 .+ 600

.030220/21 10/19/83 Co.-58 Lj 50 LT 20 Co-60 LT 40 LT 30 Cs-134 LT 40 Lj 18 Cs-137 LT 40 LT 20 Fe-59 LT 110 LT 60 K-40 4700 + 500 3900 + 400, Hn-54 Lj 40 LT 19 Zn-65 LT 100 Lj 50 031340/41 '1/14/83 Co-58 LT 20 LT 20 Co-60 LT 20 LT a8 Cs-134 .LT 12 LT 14 Cs-137 46 +." 11 30 + 10 Fe-59 Lj 70 LT 60 Hn-54 LT 16 LT 16 Zn-65 LT 50 LT 50 K-40 3300 + 400 3600 + 400 LT = Less Than 5-107

C"4 GAtNA SPECTROMETRY OF SOLIDS

~

(Page 6, of 7)

(wet) j t

NUS Radiological 'aboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 81 Result P2 NUS ID8 Collection Date Nuclides + 2s (pCi/kg) + 2s (pCi/kg) 031400/01 ~

11/14/83 Co-58 LT 70 LT 90 Co-60 LT 60 LT 70 Cs-134 LT 50 LT 50 Cs"137 LT 50 LT 50 Fe ~

LT 150 LT -170 l1n-54 LT 50 LT 60. ~

Zn-65 LT 110 LT 140 K"40 , 1100 + 400 LT 900 LT Less Than 5-108

C-4 GAMMA .SPECTROMETRY .OF SOLIDS (Page 7 of 7)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Pr ogram 1983 SPIKES OR BLIND ANALYSIS Expected Result Reported Result Collection Date Nuclides + 2s (pCi/lit) + 2s (pCi/lit) 05/27/83 Co-57 31 + 6 15 + 15 Co-60 190 + 38 200 + 40 Cd-109 870 + 170 530 + 570" Ce-139 31 + 6 21 + 16

. Cs-137 170 + 34 130 + 30 Hg-203 Sn-113 Sr-85.

'626+

70

+

+

6 20 14, LT 40 67 + 28 .

LT 50 Y"88 190 + 38 170 + 40 05/27/83 ~

Co-57

'.0 LT 30 Co-60 0.0 LT 40 Cd"109 0.0 LT 1000 Ce-139 0.0 LT 30 Cs-137 0.0 LT 40 Hg-203 . 0.0 LT 40

• Sn" 113 0.0 LT 50

• Sr-85 0.0 LT 50 Y-88 '.0 LT 40.

LT = Less Than

.- * = Lower sensitivity due to short counting time.

5-109

D-1

. IODINE"131 IN CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES (Page 1 of 3) equality NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS l

~ Result 81 Result 82 NUS IDO Collection Date + 2s (pCi/cu. m.) + 2s (pCi/cu. m.)

025820/21 06/12/83 LT 0.014 LT 0.014 025960/61 06/12/83 LT '0.02 LT 0.02 026060/61 ~

06/24/83 LT 0.018 LT 0.018 026240/41 06/30/83 LT 0.016 LT 0.016 026400/01 07/07/83 LT 0.017 L'T 0.017 026680/81 07/18/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.017 026840/41 07/21/83 LT 0.011 LT 0.02

..028180/81 08/23/83 LT 0.07 LT 0.03 028220/21 08/26/83 LT 0.009 LT 0.014 028540/41 09/06/83 'T 0.03 LT 0.05 028640/41 09/09/83 LT 0.013 LT 0.02 028700/01 09/10/83 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 028900/01 09/15/83 LT 0.013 LT 0.015 029060/61 09/20/83 LT 0.06 LT 0.04 029120/21 09/19/83 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 029140/41 09/22/83 LT 0.015 LT 0.02 029220/21 09/23/83 LT 0.06 LT 0;07 029320/21 09/26/83 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 029360/61 09/27/83 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 029560/61 10/04/83 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT = Less Than 5-110

D-1 IODINE-131 IN CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES (Page 2 of 3)

NUS Ra di ol o gi ca 1 Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS I

Result 81 Result .. 2 NUS ID8 Collection Date + 2s (pCi/cu. m.) + 2s (pCi/cu. m.)

029640/41 09/30/83 LT 0.015 . LT 0.017 029680/81 029860/61 030)40/41 10/04/83 10/11/83 10/15/83 LT 0.04 LT 0.07 Lj 0.019

'j LT 0.07 0.05 Lj 0.03 030340/41 10/17/83 LT 0.05 LT 0.08 030520/21 10/25/83 LT 0.07 'LT 0.06 030540/41 10/26/83 LT 0.04 LT, 0.04 030560/61 10/26/83 LT 0.07 LT 0.05 030580/81 10/24/83 LT 0.04 Lj 0.05 030660/61 10/29/83 LT 0.06 LT 0.05 030740/41 11/01/83 LT 0.06 Lj 0.05 030760/61 $ 0/31/83 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 030820/21 11/02/83 LT 0.06 Lj 0.05 031000/01 11/09/83 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 031200/01 11/09/83. LT 0.04 LT 0.06 031420/21 11/15/83 Lj 0.04 . LT 0.02 031460/61 11/17/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.05 031480/81 ll/14/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.019 031560/61 11/20/83 LT 0.009 LT 0.02 031720/21 11/23/83 LT 0.04 Lj 0.03 031820/21 11/27/83 LT 0.015 Lj 0.017 LT = Less Than 5-111

D-l IODINE-131 IN CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES (Page 3 of 3) equality NUS Radiological Laboratory

'nternal Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result 81 Result 82 .

NUS IDO Collection Date + 2s (pCi/cu. m.) + 2s (pCi/cu. m.)

031840/41 1'1/29/83 LT 0.04 LT 0.019

'31860/61 11/23/83 'T 0.05 . LT 0.07 031900/01 11/30/83 Lj 0.03 LT 0.03 031940/41 12/03/83 LT 0.06 LT 0.03 031960/61 12/04/83 LT 0.009 LT 0.03 032100/01 12/05/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.07 032120/21 12/07/83 LT 0.05 LT 0.06 Oi

032260/61 12/12/83 LT 0.013 LT 0.02 032400/01 12/13/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.05 032420/21 12/15/83 LT 0.07 LT 0.06 032460/61 12/19/83 LT 0.013 LT 0.009

'32500/01 12/20/83 LT 0.06 LT 0.04 032520/21 12/19/83 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 032580/81, '2/21/83 LT 0.'07. LT 0.06

'032640/41 12/27/83 LT 0.014 LT 0.015 t

LT = Less Than

• '-112

D-2 IODINE-131 IH MILK (Page 1 of 2) equality HUS Radiological Laboratory Internal Control Program

'1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Collection Results fl Results 82 HUS ID> Date + 2s (pCi/l) + 2s (pCi/1) 023560/61 01/18/83 LT 0.5 LT 0.6 0247?0/21 04/ll/83 LT 0.3 . LT 0.2 025460/61 LT 0.6. LT 0.7 05/25/83'6/27/83

.026100/01 LT 0.03 LT 0.015 026980/81 07/25/83 LT 0.3 LT 0.'4 027980/81 08/22/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.05 030640/41. 10/29/83 LT 0.12 LT 0.12 030680/81 10/31/83 LT 0.12 LT .0. 12 031740/41 ll/28/83 ~

LT 0.14 LT 0.2

'T 032340/41 12/14/83 0.08 LT 0.08 LT = Less Than

.5-113

D-2 IODINE-131 IN MILK (Page 2 of 2)

NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal,(}uality Control Program 1983 SPIKES BLINO AND REFERENCE ANALYSIS Expected Results Reported Resul ts Cc 1 1 ecti on Da te + 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/1) 02/28/83 2.8 + '.0 1.0 + 0.1 03/09/83 9.9 + 2.0 8.6 + 1.0 04/14/83 13.4 .+ 2 2 I

05/10/83 23.7 + 3 22' 05/26/83 6.0 + I.Q 4.0' 1 0 06/15/83 11 + 2 8.0 + 0.8 06/22/83 58 + 10 5.2 + 0.6 ess an 5-114

D-3

, NUS IODINE-131 IN MATER Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS IDS'ollection Result fl Result

+ 2s 82 NUS Date + 2s (pCi/1) (pCi/1) 023080/81 , 12/25/82 LT 0.5 LT 0.5 024400/01 03/16/83, LT 0.3 LT 0.3 024600/01 03/31/83 LT 0.3 LT 0.3 025540/41 05/25/83 LT 0.5 LT 0.5 026180/81 06/27/83 LT 0.7 LT 0.06 026280/81 06/30/83 LT 0.5 LT 0.6 026720/21 07/06/83 LT 0.4 LT 0.04 026880/81 07/21/83 LT 0.3 ' LT 0.6 027160/61 07/29/83 LT 0.2 LT 0.2 030200/01 10/17/83 LT 0;06 "LT 0.05 031320/21 11/14/83 0.08- + 0.03 0".12 + 0. 03 031380/81 11/14/83 LT 0.08 LT 0.08

'T 031600/01 11/21/83 0.15 + 0.07 0.12 LT = Less Than 5-115

D"3 IODINE"131 IH WATER NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal t)uality Control Program 1983 SPIKES, BLIND, AND REFERENCE ANALYSIS Expected Result' Repor ted Result Collection, Date 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/1)

~ I 01/24/83 6.9 + 0.7 6.2 + 1.7 01/24/83 3.4 + 0.3 3.5 + 1.3

~ . 01/24/83 0.0 LT 0.3 0'4/14/83 '27+ 3 23 +.'3 05/02/83 9:4 + ' 11 + 2 06/22/83 8.7 + 1.0 .8.1 +

1.0"'T

= Less Than (1) Changed to reflect correct reporting convention.

5-116

E" 1 STRONTIUM IN MILK NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal guality Control Program 4 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Col 1 ecti on Result 81 Result 82 NUS ID8 Da te Nucli de + 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/1) 022860/61 01/18/83 Sr-89 LT 1.0 LT 1.0 Sr"90 LT 1.0 LT 1.0 027980/81 08/22/83 Sr-89 LT 1.0 . LT 0.7 Sr-90 LT 2 LT 2 i

LT = Less Than 5-117

Deed E"I STRONTIUM, IN MILK NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal (}uality Control Program 1983 SPIKES BLIND AND REFERENCE ANALYSIS

'ollection Expected Result 'Reported Result

. Date Nuclide + 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/1)

.02/28/83 Sr-89 0.0 0.0 Sr"90 4.1 + 0.8 3.7 + 1.2 03/09/83 Sr-89 9 + 2 6.4 + 4.7 Sr-90 . 45 + 10 .

, 30 + '6

~ I LT = Less Than 5-118 wl

e NUS Internal E"2 STRONTIUM IN RATER Radiequality ol ogi cal Laboratory Control Program 4 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Col 1ecti on Result 81 Result 82 NUS IDe Date Nuclide -+ 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/1)

'22780/81 01/06/83 Sr-90 LT 1.1 LT 1.2 j

022820/21 01/26/83 Sr-90 LT 1.2 LT 1.1 022860/61 12/15/82 Sr-90 LT 1.0 LT 1.0 031583 . 09/30/83 'r-89 7300 + 800 6900 + 700 Sr-90 4

'0+

25+ 4 LT = Less Than 5-119

E-2 STRONTIUM IN WATER NUS equality Radiological Laboratory Internal Control Program

.1983 .

(SPIKES BLIND AND REFERENCE ANALYSIS)

Col le cti on Expected Result fl Reported Result S2-....

Date Nuclides + Zs (pCi/lit) . + 2s {pCi/lit) 02/28/83 Sr-90 4.1 + 0.8 4.7 + 1.0 03/04/83 Sr-89 0.0 LT 1.0 Sr-90 0.0 LT 1.0 03/04/83 Sr-90 8.7 + '.0 8.6 + 1.0

~

03/09/83.... Sr-89.'.- ~"

Sr-90 '5 8.3 +

+

2.0 5

71 23

+

+

19 3

04/14/83 Sr-89 7.3 + 2 11'+ 5 J Sr-90 8.2 + 2 5.2 + 5.1 J ~ ~

04/14/83 Sr-89 15 + 4 20+ 6 Sr-90 21+4 10 + 7 LT = Less Than 5-120

F"1 TRITIUH IN HJTER NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal quality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Collection Resul t 1

+ 2s (pCi/l)

Result 82

+ 2s NUS ID8 Date (pCi/1) 022940/41 01/11/83 LT 300 LT 300 1

023780/81 09/27/82 LT 300 LT 300 024120/21 03/28/83 LT 300 LT 300 025000/01 04/26/83 LT 300 LT 300 025540/41 05/25/83 LT 300 LT 300 025720/21 04/07/83 LT 300 LT 300 026660/61 06/21/83 6000 + 600 5800 + 600 026800/01 06/27/83 780 + 200 740 + 200 026600/01 08/24/83 2300 + '00 2500 + 300 031800/0) ~

11/29/83 LT 300 LT 300 LT = Less Than 5-121

F-I TRITIUM IH MATER NUS Ra di ol ogi ca 1 La bora tory Internal l}uality Control Program 1983 SPIKES BLANK, AND REFERENCE ANALYSIS Expected Result Reported Result Date + 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/l)

'ollection 01/03/83 , 4500 + 500 4300 + 400 01/18/83 4600 + 500 + 400 01/28/83 .- ,

."4600 + 500 4,200 4800 + 500 02/18/83 .4600 + 500. 4200 + 400 02/25/83 4600 + 500 4500 + 500 03/18/83 4600 + 500 4300 + 500 04/18/83 4600 + 500 4200 + 500 04/27/83 4600 + 500 4000 + 400 04/29/83 4600 + 500- 4900 + 500 04/14/83 0.0 LT 300 04/14/83 0.0 LT 300 04/26/83 4590 + 500 4300 + 500 05/18/83 4590 + 500 3200 + 400 06/20/83 4590 + 500 4000 + 400 06/28/83 4590 + 500 4100 + 500 I

LT = Less Than 5-122

F-2 TRITIUM IN URINE NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal equality Control Program 1983 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Collection Result 81 '.Result 82 NUS ID8 Date + 2s (pCi/1) + 2s (pCi/1) 026380/81 06/15/83 4000 + 1900 2400 + 1600 029720/21 08/19/83 21000 + 3000 19000 + 2000 t

LT = Less Than 5-123

~ 4&

• 4 ~ i r t

\'

~

g

<<]

g l

I iJ 1

.J 0' 1

SECTION. II I RESULTS Of 1983 EPA COMPARISON PROGRAM 5-124

I' k4 /Ah AN l 4'4 i

I C

C

]

)

1 0

1 S

e I

l I

3 4

ft l 'j

.:l

,1

',I J

4 L

I

!g I"

1 0;

(I

, ~

1 I

JV* it V .A \OH ~

e

, A-1 GROSS ALPHA IN'ATER USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 y

EPA Resu1ts NUS Results Co11ection Date ~

". + ls.:.(pCi/1) + ls (pCi/1) 01/21/83 " 29.-'+ 4 30+1 03/18/83 ",31' 4 31+ 2 05/20/83 '. ll' ~

3 16 + 2 07/15/83 70 + 29 11 + 1 ll/18/83 14+ 5 11 + 0 (1)

(1) Value not repor'ted to EPA in time to be included in report.

\

L

5-125

L 8-1 GROSS BETA IN MATER USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 EPA Results NVS. Results Collection Date + ls (pCi/1) + 1s (pCi/1) 01/21/83 31 + 3 33 + 1 03/18/83 28 + 3 24 + 2.

05/20/83 ~

57 + 6 46 + 5 07/15/83 22+ 3 27'+ 2 11/18/83 16+ 5 14 + 1 (1)

I ~ ~

~

(1) Value not reported to EPA in time to be included in report.

5-126

C-2 GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF MATER USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983

'ol lecti on EPA Results HUS Results Date Hucli des + Is (pCi/l) + 1s (pCi/l) 02/04/83 Cr-51 45 + 3 LT 40 Co-60 22 + 3 22+ 2 Zn-65 21+ 3 19+ 1 Ru-106 48+ 3 41+ 8 Cs-134 20. + 3 20 + 1 Cs-137 19 + 3 20 + 0 06/03/83 Cr-51 60+3 LT 80 Co-60 13 + 3 14 + 1 Zn-65 36 + 3 37 + 5 Ru"106 40 +,3 LT 50 Cs-134 47 + 3 42 + 2 Cs-3.37 26 + 3 26 + 2 10/07/83 Cr-51 51 + 5 35 + 6(1)

Co-60 19+5 19 + 1 Zn-65 40 + 5 39 + 1 Ru-106 52 + 5 40 + 3 Cs-134 15 + 5 13 + 1 Cs"137 22 + 5 22 + 1 LT - Less Than (1) Average counting error for these analyses was + 14 which overlaps the EPA warning and control limits.

5-127

D-1 IODINE IN MILK a USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 Collection EPA Results NUS Results Date + 1s (pCi/l) + 1s (pCi/l) 02/25/83 55+ 3 56+ 6 06/10/83 30 + 3 43 + 0(1) 10/28/83 40 + 6.93 27 + 1.7 (1) Only one number reported due to improp'er preparation of sample.

Insufficient data to determine statistics.

5-128

D-2 IODINE-131 IN WATER USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 EPA Results NUS Results Collection Date + ls (pCi/1) + 1s (pCi/1)

If 12/03/82 37 + 3 35 + 3 04/01/83 27 + 3 25 + 3 08/05/83 14 + 6 ll + 1 12/16/83 20+ 6 16 +

5-129

E-1 PLUTONIUM IN .MATER USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 EPA Resu1ts NUS Resu1ts Co11ection Date + ls (pCi/1) ' ls (pCi/1) 07/08/83 8.9 + 0.5 8.3 + 0.9 5-130

F-1 RADIUM-226 5 228 IN MATER USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 Collection EPA Value NUS Value Date Nuclide + 1s (pCi/l) + 1s (pCi/1) 12/17/82 Ra-226 110 + 10 11+ 2 Ra-228 0.0 + 0.0 LT Ra-226 12. 7 + 1. 10+ 1'3/11/83 1

0.0 +. 0.0 LT 0'a-228 1

06/17/83 Ra-226 4.8 + 0.4 6.2 + 1.4 Ra-228 0.0 + 0.0 LT 1 09/09/&3 Ra-226 3. 1 + 0.47 5.3 + 0.7(1)

~

Ra-228. 2.0 + 0.3 1 9 + 0 5 LT = Less Than (1) anomalous results under investigation.

5-131

G-1 STRONTIUM IN MILK USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 Collection EPA. Results NUS Results Date Nuclide + 1s (pCi/l) + 1s (pCi/l) 02-25-83 Sr-89 37 + 3 30+ 6 Sr-90 18+ 1 16 + 0

~ ~

5-132

G-2 STRONTIUM IN WATER USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 Collection EPA Results NUS Results Date Nuclide + ls (pCi/1) + 1s (pCi/l) 01/07/83 Sr-89 29.2 + 2.9 29 + 3 Sr-90

'7.2 + 0.9 15 + '1 ~

05/06/83 Sr-89 57 + 3 64 + 5 Sr-90 38 + 1 42 + 3 09/02/83 Sr-89 15 + 5 22 + 2 Sr-90 10' 1.5 7'3 + 0 5-133

H>>l TRITIUM IN MATER USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 EPA Resu1ts NUS Results Co11ection Date + ls (pCi/1) + ls (pCi/1) 02/ll/83 2560 + 204 2530 + 140 04/08/83 3330 + 210 3500 + 0 06/10/83 1529 + 194 1333 + 58 08/12/83 1836 + 198 1900. + 200 10/14/83, 1210 + 190 1167 + 58 1

12/09/83 2389 + 203 2333 +

r 58'-134

H-2 TRITIUM IN URINE USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983.

EPA Results NUS Results Collection Date + 1s (pCi/1) + 1s (pCi/l) 03/18/83 2470 + 210 1967 + 404 06/10/83 1589 + 195 1367 + 58 11/04/83. 1008 + 338 1474 + 320 (1)

(1) Yalue not reported to EPA in time for report.

5-135

IN MATER J-1'RANIUH USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAH 1983 EPA Results NUS Results Collection Oate ~ + 1s (pCi/l) + 1s (pCi/1) ...

02/18/83 ~

~

~

31 + 3 33 + l.

h 08/19/83 26 + 3 27 + 1 k

~

5-136

K-1 RADIONUCLIDES ON AIR FILTER USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAH 1983 EPA Value NUS Value Date 'adionuclide +ls (pCi/filter)

'ollection +1s (pCi/filter) 03/25/83 Al pha 26 + 3.7 27-3 + 2 Beta 68 -+"'3 '68 + 1 Sr-90 20 + 1 22 + 2 Cs"137 27 + 3 29 + 6 a

08/26/83 Alpha. 13 + 5 10 + 2 Be ta 36 + 5 35+ 5 Sr-90 10 + 15 125 + -

5 (2) ~

--"--- Cs" 137 15+ 5 13 + 5 11/2.5/83 Al pha 19 + 29 .26.7 + 1.5 Beta 50 + 29 53.7 R

+ 1.2 (1) Value from original EPA report was incorrect. Report value is recalculated with correct efficiency. Original reported value was 79.7.

(2) Anomalous results under investigation.

5-137

L-1 EPA "Blind", Analysis (water)

USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 Collection EPA Value NUS Yalue Date ~

Nuclide + 1s (pCi/l) + 1s (pCi/l) 05/09/83 'lpha 64 + 16 57 +4 (1)

Beta 149 + 7.5 '23 + 6 (1).

Sr-89 24 + 3 27 + 3 Sr-90 13 + 1 17 + 1 Ra-226 8.5 + 0.8 9.2 + 0.1 Ra-228 4.7 + 0.4- 3.3 + 0.4 Co-60 30'3

+ 3 31 +

Cs-134 + 3 29 + 2' Cs-137 27 + 3 25 2 U 25 + 3 25 + 2 11/14/83 Al pha 22 + 5.5 21 +

Beta 63 5 58 +

Sr-89 17 + 5 25 +

Sr-90 8 + 1.5 10.57 + 2.21 Ra-226 5.1 + 0.8 .5.5 + 0.3 Ra-228 2.8 + 0.4 .1;73 + .23 Co-60 ll + 5 .::i5;33 + 3.1 (2)

Cs-137 15 + 5  : '9.'17 + 3.0 Cs-134 15 + 5 .-; .'. 9.9 + 1. 82 U ll + 6 12 + 0 (1) Original EPA report was incorrect, correc'i ed'PA value di not include an error (2) NUS value is average of one positive value and two LLD's which were reported.

5-138

M-1 Results of Sixth International Intercompari son of Environmental Dosimeters Expected Value NUS Value

+1s (mR) . +1s (mR)

Field Exposure 43.5 + 2.2 51.2 + 7.9 Field Exposure 202 + 10 218 + 13 (pre-irradiated)

Lab Exposure 158 + 8 . 161 + ll 5-139

4 ' J A 4'J 44M l~h ~k ~sh4 l4~ 'J k

~ wo'.4 '>1 A L 4 V(h f '1 WA

l

\

YjJ

~

~

J I"

1 C

II P 8 J

S t ~ .J I

F,

J',-

C I

J~

iJ

SECTION IV REPORTING OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS In the tables presenting analytical measurements, the calculated 'value is reported with the two sigma counting error (2s) derived from a statistical analysis of both the sample and background count rates. The precision of the results is influenced by the size of the sample, the background count rate, and the method used to round off the value obtained to reflect the degree of significance of the results. For analytical results obtained from gamma spectral analysis, the precision is also influenced by the composition and concentrations of the radionuclides in the sample, the size of the sample, and the assumptions used in selecting the radionuclides to be quantitativ'eely determined. The two sigma error for the net counting rate is:

R R 1/2 s b 2$ =~2

'b]

0 where:

R = sample counting rate

~ ~

Rb

= background counting rate t = sample-counting time

= background counting time tb If the measurements on the samples are not statistically significant (i.e., the two sigma count error is equal to or greater than the net measured value), then. the radioactivity concentrations in the sample are considered not detected.

Results reported as less than ("LT") are below the lower limit of detection (LLD).

The LLD is defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count'(above system background) that will be detected with 95 percent probability with only.5 percent probability of falsely concluding that blank observation represents a "real" signal.

0 5-140

For a particular measurement system (that may include radiochemical separation):

LLD =

4.66sb E x V x 2.22 x Y x exp (-) ht) where:

LLD is the lower limit of detection as defined above (as pCi per unit mass or volume) sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as

'. appropriate (as counts per minute) is the counting efficiency (as counts per disin'tegration)

Y is the satryle size '(in units of mass or volume) 2.22 is the number, of disintegrations per minute per picocurie Y is the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable)

I is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide ht is the elapsed time between sample collection and counting The following are definitions or descriptions of statistical terms used in the reporting and analysis of environmental monitoring results.

5-141

P recision relates to the reproducibility of measurements within a set, that is, to the scatter or dispersion of a set about its central value.'Measures ofthe Central Value of a Set. Mean (or Average or Arithmetic Mean) is the sum i=1 .~ X- of 'the val'ues of individual results divided by the number of results in the set. The mean is given by:

n

,X ='X1 + X2 + Xn) /n = Z Xi/n i=1 Measures of Precision with a Set. Standard Deviation is the square root of the quantity (sum of squares of deviations of individual results from the mean, divided by one less than the number of results in the set). The standard deviation, s, is given by:

s = Z - 2. / (n-1)"="

(X; X) 1=1 r

a Standard deviation has the same units's the measurement. It becomes a more reliabl e expression of precision as n becomes larger. When the measurements are independent and normally distributed, the most useful statistics are the mean I

for the central'value and the standard deviation for the dispersion.

P ~

Ho~: In the USEPA.Intercomparison Program, the standard deviation given by EPA is the expected laboratory result from three analyses. The standard deviatioo given b'y NUS is the standard deviation from the mean of three reported values.

Relative Standard Deviation is the standard deviation expressed as a fraction of the mean, s/X. It is sometimes multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percentage.

~Ran e is the difference in magnitude between the largest and the smallest results in a set. Instead of a single value, the actual limits are sometimes expressed (minimum value/maximum value).

5-142

L g

'3 0

J

\

3 1

'J 1

~

d t

J I

P.

t I

P

~

2

Section V Performance Check Summary 5-143

ll

.I t

I t,

[]

I'j l

]

l

.J l3 3

I P

r i yl

Part A (Page 1 of 2) lligh Resolution Gamma Spectrometry System Period Covered 1-January-83 to 31-December-83 Co-60 + ls Detection Time . No. of EfficieIpp Energy Calibration K"40 +'ls System Period Heasurements Check Offset + ls Slope +'s Background (3) 01 01/03-03/29/83 13 765 + 35 .367 + .252: . .5005 + .0003 . 136 + 20 (4) 04/05-06/14/83 11 150 + 13 -.662 + .088; . .5001 + .0002 140 + 16 (5) 06/21-10/05/83 16 143 + 13 .490 + .139 .4994 + .0002 138 + 32 (6)

+ (7)

'.'045 10/12/83 1 1457 + 49 .453 + ~

.4990 + .0499 119 12 10/20-12/28/83 ll 1396 + 27 ,511 + .121

.4996 + .0001 149 + 29 (8) 01/03-03/29/83 13 973 + 35 .349 + .236 .5007 + .0001 139 + 26 (4) 02 =-

04/05-10/05/83 27 188 + 17 -,031 + .153 . .5008 + ,0002 126 + 22 (5) 10/12-12/28/83 12 1700 + 45 .191 + .073 .5007 + .0001 131 + 23 (7) 03 01/03-02/08/83 6 934 + 27 .077 + .045 .5008 + .0003 145 + 32 (4) 02/14"03/29/83 7 934 + 17 .031 + .060 .5010 + .0003- 142 + 38 (8)

,0003.+ .0956 ,5003 + .0007 144 + 30 (5) 04/05-07/27/83 08/03"10/05/83 '0 17 169 178

+ 13

+ 18 -.019 + .098 .4996 + .0004; 130 +

+

43 (8) 10/12"11/30/83 8 1672 + 14 .034 + .045 .4996 + .0001 137 26 (7) 12/08-12/28/83 1622 + 19 .276 + .200: .5005 + .0004 101 + 7 (8) 04 01/03-03/29/83 13 936 + 49 .152 + .114 .4994 + .0002 264 + 32 (4) 04/05"06/07/83 10 177 + 18 .053 + .088 .4992 + ,0002 250 + 36 (5) 06/14-06/21/83 2 165 + 14 .453' .197 .4995 + .0004 231 + 28 (8) 06/28/83 . l. 187 + 19 ".104 + .010 .5001 + .0500 235 +

+

24 (6) 07/02"09/06/83 10 179 + 19 .192 + .416 .5000 + .0004 238 36 (8) 10/12-12/28/83 12 1868 + 53 ".728 + .084 .5001 + .0003 292 + 36 (7)(9) .,

06 10/20-12/14/83 10 1598 + 31 -.688 + .104 .5010 + .0002 377 + 19 (7)(9)

• 12/21"12/28/83 2 1572 + 17 955 .+ 039 .5005 + ,0000 335 + 14 (8)

q 0'

E Lj MI 1

f

.J

'1 0 <(C<04)3.

5-149

k l C

)

I

';1 E I .

jl

~~

tg

<<L)

)i l

i~

'1 p' 3

'I I 'I IR I

I l

l "1

t

'I

, 1

(

CIIEIIICAL RECOVERY HO. OF STANDARD ANALYSIS l 1ETilOD llOUtlT IIEOIA PRECIPITATE SAllPLES IIEAN OEVIATION Iodine-131 Coincidence Ring Mount Milk CUI 95 .667 .151 Wa ter CUI 105 .711 .148 Gas Proportional 2" planchet Hi lk Cul 67 .738 .131 Water Cul 152 .755 .128 Strontium Two Point 2" planchet Hilk SrC03 27 .487 .233 89 and 90 Method Water SrC03 ,598 .250 Ring Mount Water SrC03 9 .601 .164 IngroMth 2" planchet Milk SrC03 11 .373 .217 2(C204)3 ll .448 .171 Water SrC03 8 - .403 -.123 8 .446 .045 2 243 Ring Mount Solids 'rC03 4 .442 .120 V2(C204) 4 ..419 .157

30 20 10 0;0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent= Chemical Recovery 1903 Iodine-131 in Hilk PY Coincidence Counting Cul Precipitation

15 10 O

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Chemical Recovery 1983 Iodine-131 in )later PY Coincidence Counting Cul Precipitation

20 15 o 10 ~ ~

5 CJl I

Ol 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 - 80 90 100 0

Percent Chemical Recovery 1983 Iodine-131 in Hilk Gas Propoi tional 'ounting Cul Precipitation

40 30

~ 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Percent Chemical Recovery 1983 iodine-131 in l)ater Gas Proportional Counting Cul 'Precipitation

~ ~

20 30 40 50 60 70 -. - 80 90, 100 Percent Chemical Recovery 1983 Strontium in Hilk Two Point Hethod 2" Planchet Strontium Carbonate Precipitation

3 O

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Percent Chemical Recovery 1903 Strontium in llater Two Point Method'"

Planchet ,.

Strontium Carbonate Precipitation

~ ~

'l III Cl.

E III C/l O

CJI I

CJI CO 0 ' "10.-.. 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Chemical Recovery 1983 Strontium in Water Two Point Hethod Ring Hount Strontium Carbonate Precipitation

2 20 .30 40 . 50 60 . 70 00 90 100

~

Percent Chemical Recovery Strontium in Hilk '983 Ingrowth 'tlethod 2" Planchet Strontium Carbonate Precipitation

c 3

CL E

O

0. 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 - 80 90 100 Percent Chemical Recovery I

1903 Strontium in Hilk Ingrowth Hethod .

Yttrium Oxa'1'ate Precipitation 2" Planchet.

.0

3 Vl OJ CL E

tfl 2

O 0 10 20 .30 40 50 . 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Chemical Recovery 1983 Strontium in llater ln'growth Method Strontium Carbonate Precipitation 2" Planchet

30 q0 . =, 50 .60 70 00 90 100 Percent Cliemical Recovery 1983 Strontium .in Water..

Ingrowth Hetho<l

.Yttrium Oxalate Precipitation 2" Planchet

C/l O

0. 10 20 30 40 . 50 60 70 80

~ Percent Chemical recovery 1983 Strontium in Solids Ingrowth Method Strontium Carbonate'recipitation Ring Mount

~

~ ~

'0 30  : 40 50 60 - 70 80 90 100 Percent Chemical Recovery 1983 Strontium. in Solids Ingrowth Hethod Yttrium Oxalate .Precipitation Ring Mount

5.3 U.S. Testin Ouality Control United States Testing Company, Inc., Richland Laboratory (U.S.

Testing) provided dosimetric services to the Supply System from 1978 through 1982 as a part of the WHP-2 pre-operational REMP. The following figures.and tables summarize U.S. Testing's quality con-trol program, as detailed in guality Assurance Procedures Manual, guality Control Program, Operating Procedures for WPPSS Radiologi-cal Environmental Monitoring Program. Figures 5-1 and 5-2 illustrate the guality Control Programs for dosimeter acceptance and for dosimeter processing, respectively. Table 5-3.1 provides a summary of International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeter results for the U.S. Testing program.

5-165

l4 4 A 4%~~' I ~ ~ %A ~

l 0 ~ G g

4

'v l

J I

. I 0, I

U.S. TESTING QUALITYASSURANCE." NEN TLD DOSIMETERS TECH.

SPECS.

INSERTS ACCEPTANCE TEST PREP. DISTR.

PACKAGING 8

'LASTIC DIMENS. ANNEAL TREAT- TO RECEIPT TESTS ~ RADIATIONTEST MENT FIELD ACCEPTANCE TESTS CHIPS PURCH 8 ~ WT. 8 DIM. CHECKS RECEIPT ~ ANNEALTEST

~ RADIATIONTEST ACCEPTANCE TESTS TEFLON PURCH 8 ~ DIMENSION TEST FILM . RECEIPT ~ TRANSMISSION

~ THERMOL'UMINESCENCE ACCEPTANCE TESTS DISTR.

PURCH Ih HOLDERS ~ DIMENSIONS TO RECEIPT

~ FILTER TESTS FIELD 840440.1A APRIL 1984

l

~,

6 A

C J

~ ~

k

')

I g

J A

I

U.S. TESTING QUALITYASSURANCE TLD DOSIMETER PROCESSING ON-GOING ~ ~

TEST OF I h

DOSIMETERS 5 HOLDERS DOSIMETER S FROM FIELD CONDUCT TESTS CALIBRATIONS DOSE REVIEW AUDIT REPORT READER ~ DARK CURRENT CORRECT AS ACCEPT MISSING AND CHECK RESULT AUDIT NEEDED RESULTS RESULTS PROCESSING ~ LIGHT SOURCE RESULTS RESULTS DOSIMETERS CARDS

~ CHECK BADGES OPERATION BLIND LOG. REVIEW

'UDITS AS NEEDED ROUTINE MAINT. ESTABLISH PURCH. MAINTAIN MAINT. LOG. SPARE SPARE SPARE PARTS TESTS REVIEW PARTS PARTS INVENTORY AS NEEDED LIST 840440-2A APAIL 1984 Ffaure 5-2

jv 1 ~ * + + ~ ' sA V'w ~ ~ V) i h w* ' '<<cv"~ <<c' I

I I

I I

f! ]

8

~

l

~J l

I*

J I

! 3 I

J

Table 5-3.1 INTERNATIONAL INTERCOMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOS IMETERS U. S. TESTING DATA 5th 6th I. Total Exp. Measured Exposure mR rror mR Exposure mR Error mR Field Dosimeter 1 43.0 44. 5 Field Dosimeter 2 49.3 47.0 Field (Pre Irr.) Dos. 1 108.0 177.7 Field (Pre Irr.) Dos. 2 94.9 171.9 Lab Dosimeter 1 122.0 132. 6 Lab Dosimeter 2 110.0 128.0 Control Dosimeter 1 , 14.5 8,5 Control Dosimeter 2  ; 11.3 7.9 II. Estimated Exposures Participants Resul ts:

Field Exposure 39. 6 9.6 44..3 4.1 Field (Pre Irr.) Exp. 88.3 21.4 173.4 5.7 Lab Exposure 103.0 19.8 122.2 5.1 Authors Results:

Field Exposure 36.6 44.3 Field (Pre Irr.) Exp. 88.3 173.4 Lab Exposure 103; 0 122.2 III. 8 -Estimated Storage Exp. 5.2 0.4 III. C Estimated Transit Exp.

Participants Results 1.0 3.0 0.8 2.6 Authors Results 1.4 0.8 5-168

3 q

g kg j

3 "J

3 H

a4

~ 1

5.4 Supply System Environmental TLD l}uality Control Figures 5-3 and 5-4, the following tables and the calculation log represent Supply System Support Services, Radiological Program's quality control for support of the REMP ambient radiation measure-ment activities. Radiological Programs began field 'trial's in 1980, concurrent with the TLD services being supplied by'U.S. Testing.

After compilation of sufficient data demonstrating the capability to conduct this aspect of the REMP internally, Supply'ystem's the TLD services through U.S. Testing were discontinued. Table .

5.4-1 sumaarizes Supply System, International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters, data from 1983.

5-169

7

~=

~

gJ'.

gp:

~ "j

~ ~

J d

H j

I

'1

'UPPLY SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTALTLD PREPARATION-USE-EVALUATION CYCLE (RPI 4.12)

ANNEAL TLDs (RPI 4.2)

LOAD BADGES AND DISTRIBUTE FIELD TRIP CONTROLS LAB CONTROL QA FIELD FIELD Pb SHIELD ANNEAL Pb SHIELD EXPOSE TO CALIBRATION DOSE Pb SHIELD b404404A Fit;ure 5-3 APRN. 1984 5-170

~/

Ra I

I t

)4

,t]

.r 1

I

J 4

l 4

C J

'I

'1 0;

'I k

\ l~

SUPPLV SYSTEM TLD EVALUATION

'I READ MAIN AREA, RESIDUAL MAIN AREA, AND BACK-UP AREA Pb SHIELD REVIEW DATA

~ ~ I ~ ~ ' I APPARENT PROBLEM N O APPARENT PROBLEM EVALUATEPROBLEM ANNEAL TLDs TAKE ACTION AS'APPROPRIATE EXPOSE TO CALIBRATIONDOSE (I.E., READ BACK-UP RESIDUAL'S, ETC.)

READ MAIN AREA RUN ENVIRONMENTAL

~ ~

CALCULATIONS & REPORT PROGRAM REVIEW DATA PROBLEM NO PROBLEM EVALUATE COMPLETE & ISSUE REPORT COMPLETE & ISSUE REPORT NO PROBLEM COMPLETE & ISSUE REPORT

• RADIOLOGICALPROGRAMS INSTRUCTION 4;12 8104184A figure 5-4 APAIL 198l

3 (g

I j

J J

3 P

0'

Table 5-4.1

~

SIXTH INTERNATIONAL INTKRCOMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOSIMETERS SUPPLY SYSTEM DATA 1983 I. Total Exposure Measured Ex osure mR Field Dosimeter 1* 48.8 Field Dosimeter 2* 50.0 Field (Pre. Irr.) Dose 1* 212.2 Field (Pre. Irr.) Dose 2* 210.0 Lab Dosimeter 1 . 13.'2 Dosimeter 2 'ab 13.0 Estimated Exposures Error mR Participants Results Field Exposure 43.6 3.0 Field (Pre. Irr.) Exp. 206.8 12.2 Lab Exposure 160.3 ~

7.6 Authors Results Field Exposure 43.6 Field (Pre. Irr.) Exp: 204.8 Lab Exposure 160.3 III 8 Estimated Storage Exp. 1.9 "III A Estimated Transit Exp.

Participants Results 1.0 0.8 Authors Results 4.4

• Type of correction applied 1 Analytical. correction 2 Physicial 5-172

1 J

r I

\

4s l

8

H i

C g ~

I

~

~>

0'

WASEtNGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM CALCULATIONLOG RAO(OLOG ICAL PROGRAMS PRCLIKCT CALCVLATIQNNQo DATE ASSIQNKD 02 84-2 01-84 PACK I QI 3 TITLK CALCULATION OF THE SUMMATION OF ERRORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ENYIRONMENTAL TLD'S QVALITYAFFKCTINC RKTKNTIQN QNQ Q'LIFKTIaCK Q NQNPKRPIIANKNT I. PURPOSE The purpose of this calculation is to show compliance with Section 3.3 of ANSI N545-1975 as modified by Regulatory Guide 4.13. The specific require-ment is as follows: Ninety-five percent of the final values (after all appropriate corrections to the measurements are applied, including those for errors expected under field conditions) sliall differ from the correct value by less than 305 of the correct value.

II. CONTENTS PAGE Purpose 1 Assumptions 1-2 Method of Calculation 2 Calcu 1 at i ons Conclusions 3 Attachment 3 References 3 III. ASSUMPTIONS For purpose of this evaluation the following assumption and data are used:

A. Calibration source stren th: + 5g At 25 mR exposure = 1.3 mR At 104 mR exposure = 5.2 mR B. Calibration time: + 3 seconds ~ I mR C. Read out: Based on reproducibility study performed March 1983 (data attached):

At 25 mR, ignor'ing TLD 189 which obviously had a bad calibration factor, the results ranged from 22 mR to 26 mR. An e'rror of ~+ 3 mR is indicated.

CQMPLKTKD BY RKVIKWKDBY PPRQVK BY DATK 5-173

WASHINGTON PUBLIC POVFER SUPPLY SYSTEM CALCULATIONLO'G CONTIt EQUATION SHEET CALCVLATIONNO 84-2 RADIOLOGICALPROGRAMS PACE ~ ~ OP At 104 mR, ignoring the 100 mR exposure and TLD 127 which obviously had a bad calibration factor for area 2, the results ranged from 101 mR to 105 mR. The average is 103.6. An error of ~+ 3 mR is indicated.

D. Uniformit and Re roducibilit: Since the TLD's used in the cited reproducibi ity study were randomly chosen, any errors due to non-uniformity and nonreproducibility would be included in the read out error.

E. Residuals: Errors 'associated with residual readings on the TLDs would be included in the read out error.

F. Length of field c cle: Based on teledynes'tudy "Evaluation of Te edynes sotopes'nvironmental TLD System for Compliance with U.S.N.R.C. Reg. Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975" dated January 6, 1982.

For a 91 day cycle, the study indicates a 7Ã .reduction or about 1.8 mR.

for a 365 day cycle, the error would not exceed four times the error in the 91 day cycle, because the rate of fading decreases with cycle length. Therefore, a maximum error of 7 mR is assumed.

IV. METHOD OF CALCULATION The overall error is determined by taking the square root of the sum of the square of the individual errors.

Y. CAl CULATION For a 91 day cycle or 25 mR exposure:

E o (1.3) + (1) + (3) + (1.8) 3.9 3.9 = 165 25 For a 365 day cycle or 100 mR exposure:

(5 2) + (1) + (3) + (7) 9.3 9.3 = 9w

~00 5-174

WASHINGTON PUBLIC POSER SUPPLY SYSTEM CALCULATIONLOG CONTINUATIONSHEET NOi PROGRAMS'ALCVLATION 84 '- 2 RADlOLOG!CAL

'PACK 3 OF 3 VI. CONCLUSIONS r The environmental TLD program complies with Section 3.3 of ANSI N545-1975.

VII. ATTACHMENT A. Reproducibility Study - Environmental TLD's, March 1983, Washington Public Power Supply System VIII.'EFERENCES A. Regulatory Guide 4.13 B. ANSI N545-1975 C. Evaluation of Teledyne Isotopes'nvironmental TLD System for Compliance with U.S.N.R.C., Reg.'uide 4.13 and ANSI N 545-1975, Janu'ary 6, 1982 5-175 WPRSl

l 0'

6 I

'J j

C l

P 0;

I

Reproducibil ity Study Environmental TLD's March 1983 1

The attached data is from re-inked TLD's and was collected as part of the acceptance testing procedure.

TLD's were dosed, read, and annealed four times (the first being a calibra-tion). Samples A and B were calibrated at 104 mR. Sample C calibrated at 50 mR.

Generally the data was very consistent and good from run to run. It appears that the bulk of the'eviation (i;e., 'all of 2a ) 1.9) was due to bad calibration values or to a single shift in a residual. That is, the 2a was consistent from run to run for an individual TLD and therefore measures a bias

~

in the system rather than a random fluctuation about a mean.

5-176

<<jlL jj j lj 'w' .aj~w ~ ~

I j

j I.

6 E

1 I

l 1

j t

~ ~

j j I

j j'

,jj d

I

~ jf' C

T f

1 j

jj

~ P j j I Ij ~ wl

<<J

Sample A Reproducibil ity Environmental TLD'.s TLD Number Dose Al A2 A3 A4 149 100 98 97 101 101 99 4.1 104 105 105 106 106 106 1.2 104 103 104 105 106 104 2.6 104 101 102 104 104 102 3.0 075 100 97 96 98 . 97 ,97 1.6 104 104 105 104 105 105 1.2 104 106 106 104 104 105 2.3 104 102 101 102 101 102 1.2 028 100 100 100 100 101 100 1.0

~ 104 105 105 103 105 104 2.0 104 105 105 103 104 104 1.9 104 101 103 103 104 103 2.5 100 99 97 100 98 98 2.6 104 103 104 104 104 104 1.0 104 105 "

105 104 104 1.'2 104'00 102 102 105 103 103 2.8 025 98 97 98 99 98 1.6 104 105 104 103 105 104 1 ~ 9 104 105 104 103 105 104 1.9

. 104 105 101 103 103 103 . 3-3 161 100 95 97 107 98 99 10. 6 104 104 106 103 104 104 2.5 104 104 104 104 '1 05 104 1.0 104 101 101 103 102 102 1.9 106 100 105 98 100 98 100 6.6 104 103 104 104 104 104

'.0 104 103 104 . 104 104 104 1.0 104 102 103 103 103 103 1.0 127 ~

100 104 98 99 99 100 5. 4 104 ill 102 103 102 104, 8.7 8.7 104 113 104 105 104 .106 104 111 101 106 106 106 8. 2 For 104 mR Dose Range m = 102-106 mR Average m = 104 mR a = 1.27.

5-177

Sample B Reproducibil ity Number Dose Environmental TLD's ..

Al A2 A3 A4

~ 'LD OQ7. 25 19 23 24 24 22 4.8 25 20 24 25 24 23 4.4 25 20 24 24 24 23 4.0 25 19 24 24 25 23 5.4

'3 189 25 13

• 20 21 19 8.7 25 14 22 22 24 20 8 9 25 14 21'0 22 23 20 ', 8.2 25 13 22 23 20 9.0 11'6 25 27 27. 25 24 26 3.0 25 25 24 24 25 ~ 24 1.2 25 24 24 25 24 24 1.0 25 24 24 24 25 24 1.0 002 25 23 23 24 24 24 1.2 25 24 23 24 24 24 1.0 25 25 24 23 23 23 24 23 24 24 24 23 10 .

j

.25 27 26 26 25 26 1 .6 25 24 24 24 24 24 25 24 24 . 24 24 24 25 23 23 24 24 24 I

066 25 22 22 23 24 23 25 22 23 24 24 23 25 22 23 23 24 23 1.6 25 ~ 2-2 22 23 24 23 25 24 24 24 24 24 0.0 25 24 24 '4 24 24 24 0.0 25 24 24 24 . 24 0.0 25;;: 24 24 24 24 24 0.0.

M/0 TLD 189 Range m = 22-26 mR Average m = 24 mR 0 0.9 5-178

Sample C Reproducibility, Study Environmental TLD's TLD Number Dose Al A2 A3 A4 101 50 64 52,:.'9 55 55 56 10.4 50 49 48 50 49 1.6 50 47 4g 47 49 48 1.9 073 50 50, 50,

'0

"':50

'/

50 49 50 50 1.0 1.0 50 50 49 '.:49 49 49 50 48 49 1.0 50 50.:,::, 51 51 49 50 1.9 182 50 50,( 50 49 50 50 1.0 50 51 51 50 50 50 1.2 50 49. " 48 48 50 49 1.9 50 51 51 51 50 51 1.0 158 50 50 48 49 49 49 .1.6 50 51 ~

49 49 49 50 ~

2. 0 50 48 47 48 49 48 1.6 50 50 49 50 49 50 1.2 188 50 44 48 49 47 4.4 ,

50 45 . 48 49 48 3. 5 50 44 47 48 46 3.5 50 44 48 48 47 4.0 136 51 51 49 50 50 1 ~ 9 50 51 50 50 50 50 1.0

'48 1.2 003'0 50 50 50 48 49 48 48 49 49 49 49 50

, 49 49 50 49 49 0.0 1.9 50 50 49 50, 50 50 ~ 1.0 50 48 48 49 49 48 1.2 50 49 50 50 49 50 1.2 Range m = 46-56 mR Average m = 49 .

a =1.8 5-179

4> ~-

~ i 1 lt s

5 b

]

r 4

I >>I

~ ~

r l

I I

l

J e a'a 45, p ~

J 4

<TELEDYNE ISOTOPES t

EVALUATIOi4 of TELEDYNE TLD SYSTEM ISOTOPES'NVIRONhIENTAL for COhtP LIANCE with U.S.H.R.C. REG. GUIDE 4.13

. and

~

ANSI N545-1975 January 6, 1982 TrLrnYNr: Isoroprs so nv, vvRrN Avrh:Ur; Ncstwnnd, Ncw Jcrscy 07675 5-180

f'j 0

S

,Jk J

l 1

'I 'I g

0; I

~TELEDYNE ISOrrOPES EVALUATION OF CaS04:D TEFLON TLD FOR COMPLIANCE MITH ANSI N545-1975 Oe endence of. Ex osure Inter retation on the Len th of Field Cycle

~pur ose: To repeat the initia'1 stu67 (1979) for the maximum temperature con-,

d~tions expected in the field.

Pre aration: A field cycle of three months was tested. Forty 25% CaS04:Oy e ion. osimeters were used for this test. All were annealed at 250oC for one hour prior to encasing in black plastic pouches. Twenty were inserted between two 0.093 inch copper rectangular sheets of the same dimensions as the

. TLD's and placed in the TI EV-2 plastic TLD holder. The other 20 were shielded with 0.022 inch copper and packaged in'he same type holders.

Ex osure On November 26, 1980< 10 each of the 0.093" and 0.022" shielded s were place. in an office closet. The other 20 were placed, in a Grieve Corp Model LO-200C oven maintained at 50oC. The oven temperatiire:was checked on numerous occasions by reading a thermometer.

Five TLD's of each temperature exposure and copper shielding were removed .

'fter

'f '47 days and read on a TI Model 8300 TLD reader. ,The remaining.TLD's were removed after 91, days and read.. All were reirradiated with a 132.mR dose Cs-137 gamma rays'and reread to determine the sensitivity of each area of each TLD.

Resu1ts: The resu1ts of tlie exposures in mR are:

47 days data: e room tempe'rature (0.022" Cu) 10.6+ 0.4 room temperature (0.093" Cu) 9.6 + 0.6 50oC (0.022" Cu) 8.7 + 0.2 50oC . (0.093" Cu) 7.9 + 0.2 91 days data:

room temperature (0.022" Cu) 19.7 + 0.2 room temperature (0.093" Cu) 17.0 + 0.1 50oC (0.022" Cu) 15.8 + O.l 50oC (0.093" Cu) 14.1, +'0.4 The ratio of the response for 91 days to'twice that obtained for 47 days is given by:

room temperature (0.022" Cu) 'l9.7 = 0.93 2(10.6) room temperature (0.093" Cu) 17.0 = 0.89 2(9.6) 50oC (0.022" Cu) '5.8 ='.91 2(8.7) 5-181

~TELEDYNE lSOMPES 50oC (0.093" CU) 14.1 = 0.89 2(7.9)

Conclusion:

Section 4.3.3 of ANSI )l545-1975 states "The ratio of the response d did i i d d i di dii shall not be less than 0.90". The test results were 0.93 for 0.022" Cu shielding and 0.89 for 0.093" Cu shielding.

I yi d yi e

~

g The guide further states "This test shall be repeated under both the minimum

~

and maximum temperature conditions expected in the field. For these tests, the ratio of the response obtained for the field cycle to twi'ce that obtained "for half the field cycle shall not be less than 0.85." The, test results for .

50oC were .0.91 for 0.022" Cu shielding and 0.89 for 0.093" Cu shielding, Thus, the'NSl-guide is satisfied for this test at the maximum temperature conditions expected 'in the field.

The attached data'heets list the exposures of each of the four areas of each TLD. The TLD's for each temperature and exposure duration are numbered as below:

47 da s 91 da s 0.022" CU 0.093" CU 0.022" CU . 0.0930. CU Room. temperature RT423-22 RT473-93 RT424-22 RT470-93 RT427-22 RT474-93 RT425-22 RT471-93 RT430-22 RT475-93 RT426-22 RT472-93 BT431-22 RT477-93 RT428-22 RT476-93 RT432-22 RT479-93 RT429-22 RT478-93 50oC OT413-22 OT461-93 OT414-22 OT460-93 OT415-22 OT462-93 OT41 6-22 OT464-'93 OT420-22 . OT463-93 OT417-22 OT465-93 OT421-22 OT468-93 'T418-22 'T466-93 OT422-22 OT469-93 OT419-22 OT467-93 5-182

r~ TELEDYNE ISOTOPES ENVIRONMENTAL TLO EXPOSURE REPORT 60 VhN SUREN AVENUE ~

11/26/80 - 01/12/81 IHESTWOOO. NEW JERSEY 076IO laO>) 66'.TOTO TEl.EX.aeiri I

I

.Ms<

f THC. RESULTS. INDICATED BELOW HAVE BEE"3 OBTAINEO US ING THE TELEDYNE ISOTOPES READOUT SYSTEM AND DOSIMETERS ~ THE ORIGINAL DATA ARE RETAINED ON FILE'i

3 GROSS EXPOSURES IN MR, IDENT'REA 1 AREA 2 AREA 3 AREA 4 AVERAGE STD ~ DEV ~

RT423-22 '

RT427" 22 RT430- 22 RT431-22 R74 32- 22 ll 10 '

10 '

ll 2 5 2

10 '

10 4 10 ~ 5 10 ~ 8 ll 3 10 9'

lie 0 10 ~ 5 10 ~ 4

'0 10 11

"',ll 11 0

~

~

~

1, 4

5 .

10i4 10 3 10 ~ 4 11 ~ 0 1 le 1 0 3 0~5 0~4 0 5 0~5

'T473-93 9~ 5 9~3 9~1 9~3 0 ~2 9~

.. 10 '

9, R T4 74-93 9~3 9+9 9~5 9 ~3 9s5 0 3

~ 'T477- RT475-93 RT479-93

'7413-22 OT4 q3 15-22 OT420-22

'010 ~ 4 10 '

8~8 8~ 8 8~ 5 8 '

11 ~ 2 8~ 8 9~2 9~ 0 9 1 Bi7 9

9 0

9

~ 5 8~9 8~5 9 ~ 6' 8~

8~2 8~6 8~6 10 90'6 8~6 8~8

~

~ 5 0 ~6 0~5 0~1 0~4 0 ~ 3" 0~2 OT421- 22 8 ' 9+ 1 8+7 . 8~5 8~7 0 ~3

.',. " OT422-22 9 0 9 2 8 ' 9 ' 9~0 0~2 OT461-93 7+6 8~ 3 7 ' 7 ' 7~8 Oo4

~ OT462-93 7' 8 1 7~5 8 ~ 4 8~0 0~4 OT463- 93 8+8 0~2 8 ~ 0 8 ' 8~2 0 ~4 OTii 60-93 7~7 7 .5 70 3 7 ' 7 ' 0 ~2 OT469-93 .8 ~ 3 7~5 8 ' 7 ' . 8 ' 0~4 THESE GROSS EXPOSURES WE RE OBTA I %ED'N THE ABSLNCE OF DES IGRATED'ONTROL DOS IMETERS FOR SUGTRACTI NG TRANS I T DOSES AND S YS T EM 0 ACKGROU'30 ~

a 5-183

~~TELEDYNE JE C

fSOTOPES ENVIRONS'ENTAL TLO EXPOSURE, REPCRT 50 VAN SUAEN AVENUE 1 1/26/80 - 02 /25/8 1 WESTWOOO. NEW JEASEY 016 (201) 664 TOTO.TEi.EX 124424 19s 1.'

1.3 ANS I THE RESULTS !NOICATCO BELCH'HAVE OEEN OBTAINED US ING Tt-E T- L ECYNE ISOTOPES READOUT SYSTEM ANO OOSIPETERS ~ THE CRIGINAL DATA ARC RETAIKEC ON FILE ~

GROSS EXPCSURES IN MR IDENT ~ . AREA 1 ARC.A 2 AREA 3 AREA 4 PVERPC E STO ~ CEV ~

RT424-'22 19.2 3 19 7 19 ~ 9 19 ~ 5 0+3 RT4 25-22 19o8 2C 0 ZG AC 19 ~ 6 19 ' 0 ~2 18 ' '

RT426-2Z . 19 9. 19 19' 19>6 0 5 RT428-22 19 2 X9 6 19 ' 20 ~ 0 19 ' 0 ~3 0

RT429-22 19 ~ 2C ~ 0'6 19 ~ 9. 20 ~ 0 .19 ~ 9 0 ~2 RT47C-93 6'.7+

1 ~ 9 17 17 ~ 3 17 1 0 2 l

~

RT471-93 17.4 16 ~ 9 1'7+C 17 ~ 17 ~ 1 0 2.

RT472-93 16 ~ 9 16 ~ 9 16 ' 17 F 1 16 ' 0 1 RT476-93 16 ~ 6 16 ~ 7 16 ' 17 ' 16 ' 0 ~3 RT478-93 16. 7 17' 17 1 17 ' 16i9 0 2 OT414-22 15 ~ 5 15 ~ 9 16 2 15 ' l. ~ 9 0 3 16 ' '

OT416-22 OT4 17- 22 OT418- 22 OT419-22 15.3 2'9 15 ~ 6 15 ~ 9

15. 7

16. 0 15+ 9 16 ~ 1 16 1 16 ~ 0 15 ~ 7 15.7 15 15 ~ 7.

15 ~ 6 15 7 15i9 15 '

15 ~ 7 9 O.Z 0-1 0

0

~

~

1 3

OT46C-93 14 4 '15 2 15 ' 14 ' 14 ~ 0 0 ~ 3 OT464-93 13 ~ 6 13 ~ 8 13 ' 14 ' 13 ~ 9 0 ~ 2 OT465-93 13 ' 13 ~ 8 13 ' 14 ' 13 ~ 9 0 ~2 66-93 'T41 14 0 141 ~ 4 13 ' 14 F 1 14+1 0 ~ 2 OT467-93 14 14+ 1 13 ' 14 ' 14 ' 0 ~ 1 THESE GROSS EXPOSURES MERE DGTA! NEC IN THE AQS EKC E CF CES I GN AT EC CONTROL DOS It'FTERS FOR SUOTRACT! NG TRANS! T OCSES ANO SYSTEM 8ACKGBCUNC ~

5-164

5.5 State of-'Washington Department of Social and Health Services, Radi-ation Control Section; Office of Environmental Health Pro rams

/

The State of Washingtons Radiation Control Section in support of the states, Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, has established an auditing program that involves the analysis of split or replicate samples from the Supply Systems sampling program. This duplicate analysis of environmental media provides an additional quality control phase to the Supply Systems program. The results of the states analyses are compared with reported Supply System analysis and reported annually by the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services in an Environmental Radiation Program Annual Repor t.

The Department of Social and Health Services auditing program began in 1978 concurrent with the implementation of the Supply Systems

,pre-operational radiological environmental monitoring program.

5-185

0 i;-

c'~m l

r~~ >

il I

'I J

0

")

1 J

']

I

6.0 REFERENCES

NCRP Report 850, Environmental Radiation Measurements, 1976.

Gilbert, R.O. and R.R. Kinnison, "Statistical Hethods for Estimating the Mean and Variance from Radionuclide Data Sets Containing Negative, Unreported or Less-Than Values", Health Physics 1981; Vol. 40, pp 377-390.

PNL-2932, Environmental Surveillance at Hanford for CY-1978.1979.

'PNL-3283, Environmental Surveillance at Hanford for CY-1979.1980.

PNL-3728, Environmental Surveillance at Hanford for CY-1980.1981.

PNL-4211, Environmental Surveillance at Hanford for CY-1981.1982.

PNL-4657, Environmental Surveillance at Hanford for CY-1982.1983.

PNL-5038, Environmental Surveillance at Hanford for CY-1983.1984.

PNL-2933, Environmental Status of the Hanford Site for CY-1978.1979.

10 Environmental Status of the Hanford Site for CY-1979.1980. 'NL-3284, 11 PNL-3729, Environmental Status of the Hanford Site. for CY-1980.1981.

12 PNL-4212, En'vironmental Status of the Hanford Site for CY-1981.1982.

.13. PNL-4658, Environmental Status of the Hanford Site for CY-1982.1983.

PNL-5039, Envi'ronmental Status of the Hanrord Site for CY-1983.1984.

PNL-2724, Vertical Contamination in the Unconfined Ground Water at the Hanford Site, Washington, 1978.1979.

16 PNL-3284, Vertical Contamination in the Unconfined Ground Water at the Hanford Site, Mashington, 1979.1980.

17 PNL-3729, Vertical Contamination in the Unconfined Ground Water at the Hanford Site, Washington, 1980.1981.

18 PNL-4212, Vertical Contamination in the Unconfined Ground Mater at the Hanford Site, Washirigton, 1981.1982.

19 PNL-4658, Vertical Contamination in the Unconfined Ground Water at the Hanford Site, Washington, 1982.1983.

20 PNL-5039, Vertical Contamination in the Unconfined Ground Mater at the Hanford Site, Mashington, 1983.1984.

21 Site Certification Agreement (SCA) between the State of Mashington and the Washington Public Power Supply System for Hanford 82 (MNP-2),

Attachment I (Rev. 1) January 1978.

6-1

22 BNML-2305. Association of Hanford Origin Radionuclides with Columbia River Sediment. 1977.

23 PNL-3127. Radiological Survey of Exposed Shorelines and Islands of the Columbia River Between Vernita and the Snake"River Confluence. 1980.

24 Beasley, T.M. and C.D. Jennings, "Inventories of Ru-239/240, Am-241.,

Cs-137 and Co-60 in Columbia River Sediments from Hanford to the Columbia River Estuary", Environmental Science. and Technology. 1984, 18, pg.

207-21 2.

25 NCRP Report'5, Natural Background Radiation in the United'tates, 1975.

26 Kathren, R.L., Radioactivity in the Environment, Sources, Distribution, and Surveillance, Harwood Academic Publishers, 1984.

27 Eberline Nuclear Services Division guality Assurance Manual, Eberline Nuclear Servic'es, Santa Fe, New Mexico, July.1984.

28 Summary of quality Control Data For the NUS Radiological Laboratory, NUS Corporation, 1983, Environmental Services Division, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, March 1984.

6-2

DISTRIBUTION No. of 'No. of Copies Copies SUPPLY SYSTEM:

J.D. Mar tin O.E. Larson WNP-2 Plant Manager Radiological Programs, Manager MD¹ 927S MD¹ 1020 P.O. Box 968 P.O. Box 968 Richland, WA 99352 Richland, WA 99352 (3) R.G. Graybeal Environmenta t Programs Library WNP-2 Health Physics/ MD¹ 1020 Chemistry, Manager P.O. Box 968 MD¹ 927S Richland, WA 99352 P.O. Box 968 Richland, WA 99352 R.W. Craig 0

Radiological Support Services, ~

R.P. Powell Supervisor WNP-2 Project Licensing, Manager MO¹ 1020 MO¹ 9568 P.O. Box 968 P.O. Box 968 Richland, WA 99352 Richland, WA- 99352 G.C. Sorensen W. Davis III

~

Environmental Programs Regulatory Programs, Manager MD¹ 1020 MD¹ 340 P.O: Box 968 P.O. Box 968 Richland, WA 99352 Richland, WA 99352 WNP-2 Files C. Van Hoff MD¹ 964Y Senior State Liaison P.O..Box 968 MD~ 340 'Richland, WA 99352 P.O. Box 968 Richland, WA '9352 Supply System Library MD¹ 330 J.P. Chasse P.O. Box 968 Senior Environmental Licensing, Richland, WA 99352 Engineer MD¹ 340 P.O. Box 968 Richland, WA 99352, R.A. Chitwood Emergency Planning and Environmental Programs, Manager MD¹ 1020 P.O. Box 968 Richland, WA 99352

No. of Copies DISTRIBUTION No. of Copies 0

OFFSITE AGENCIES:

(3) L. Fitch (1). T. Strong Executive Secretary WA State Dept. Social EFSEC 8 Health Services 820 East 5th Avenue Airdustrial Park - Bldg. 6 Olympia, WA 98504 Mail Stop 98504 LF-13'lympia, WA (3) R.R. Mooney WA State Dept. Social (3) D.R. Elle 5 Health Services U.S. Department of Energy Mail Stop B17-9 Richland Operations Office 1409 Smith Tower Bldg. Federal Building Seattle, WA 98104. 825 Jadwin Avenue Richland, WA R.D. Paris 99352'.R.

Radiation Control Section Price Oregon State Health Division Senior Research Scientist, P.O. Box 231 Portland, OR 97207 R.L. Dirkes Supervisor Occupational 8 Environmental Protection Battelle, P.O. Box 999 PNL Bldg. 318, Trailer 3, Room 34 0

Occupational 5 Environmental. Richland, WA 99352 Protection Battelle, PNL E. Cowan Bldg. 318, Trailer 3, Room 15 Environmental Protection Agency P.O. Box 999 Region X Richland, WA 99352 1200 - 6th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101 J.K. Prince WIPP-Project P.O. Box 2078 Carlsbad, NM 88221