ML17272B003
| ML17272B003 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia, Washington Public Power Supply System  |
| Issue date: | 06/16/1980 |
| From: | Renberger D WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| To: | Youngblood B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17272B004 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8006240404 | |
| Download: ML17272B003 (10) | |
Text
0 REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION S~EM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:8006200409'OC',DATE:
80/06/16 NOTARIZED'O
'OCKET FACIL:50-397 WPPSS,Nuclear Projecti Unit 2E Washington Public Powe 05000397 50-460 WPPSS Nuclear ProjectE Unit ii Washington Public Powe 05000060 50 513 WPPSS Nuclear Projecti Unit 4i Washington Public Powe 05000513 AUTH BYNAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION RENBERGERED ~ L.
Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP ~ NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION YOUNGBLOODEB.J ~
Licensing Branch 1
SUBJECT:
Forwards drawings re location for near site emergency ctr, Requests immediate review 8
response so, that site specific design work can proceed L site preparation can begin.
Drawings available in Central Files only, DISTRIBUTION CODE:
BOO IS COPIES RECEIYED:LTR g ENCL
/ SIZE:
TITLE: PSAR/FSAR AMDTS and Related Correspondence NOTES ~ W Q 8 I/
AT RECIPIENT ACTION: 'D
'Ag( S/yg~~
" INTERNAL: A/D CORE 8
CS13 AUX SYS BR 18 CONT SYS BR DIRECTOR NRR EMERG PREP 22 GEOSC IEN BR 09 HYD/GEO BR 11 IaE 06 MATL ENG BR MPA OELD PROC/TST REV BR R
S BR 12
~I E
01 STRl3 NG BR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
0 1
0 1
0 1
1 1
1 1
0 0
1 1
3 1
1 1
0 1
0 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 RECIP IENT
,IDyQkMoAo)E,8 PM gy~~ p 05 QdgRaPA ACCID EVAL BR CHEM ENG BR CORE PERF BR 17 EFF TR SYS BR ENV ENG BR HANAUERES ~
IEC SYS BR 20 KIRKWOOD,R.
MECH ENG BR NRC PDR 02 POWER SYS BR QA BR 10 REAC SYS BR SIT ANAL BR 27 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
0 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 fu EXTERNAL-'ACRS
, NSIC p p-50 R
518% PRoMm~
g,. &RSWe.s 30 04 10 10 1
1 2
.,/
I
(
LPDR 03 1
1 JUN 25 jggo
%0 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES RFQUIRED; LTTR 54 ENCI
'0 0
r i
'a 1
i1
>1 1
h h
I t
J pl i
0 Washington Public Power Supply System A JOINT OPERATING AGENCY P. 0. BOX 958 3000 0EO, WASHINCTON WAY RICHLAND, WASHINCTON 99352 PHONE (509) 375 5000 June 16, 1980 Docket Nos.
50-397 50-460 50-513 Mr. B. J.
Youngblood, Chief Licensing Branch No.
1 Division of Licensing U.
S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.
C.
20555
Dear Mr. Youngblood:
Subject:
Emer enc Pre aredness
- Near-Site Emer enc Center The Supply System has undertaken the project of satisfying the requirements for a near-site emergency center, which will jointly serve our Hanford Site
- projects, to be constructed as soon as feasible on the Hanford Reservation.
Present criteria (NUREG 0654) places the center within one mile of the plant.
The Supply System is constructing three nuclear plants on the Hanford Reservation, approximately one mile apart in the shape of a triangle.
The preferred location for the near-site emergency center, based upon wind direction, lease agreements, utility hookups, exclusion areas and accessibility, is approximately three-quarters of a mile from WNP-2, our first plant to go on line.
This location, however, is approximately one and one-half miles from WNP-1 and WNP-4.
The attached documentation describes the criteria used for selecting the preferred location of the center.
0053 45 /0 0 The purpose of this letter is to provide you the opportunity to review our selected location of the center.
Because of the time constraints for satisfying the new NRC requirements and providing a support facility for WNP-2, we request your immediate review of this document.
This will allow us to proceed with the site specific design work and begin site preparation.
If no word to the negative has been received in 30 days, we will consider the site meets your approval.
Oo/
)/)
~so:
" ~'
gje-PoR Qa(0 QogR~g gt"ging 4S l
TSIA S~wSI 4 ~RR Zil 4~)
M zac F:II'I ~+sz p/~,g
0 It I
I
Mr. B. J.
Youngblood Page 2
June 16, 1980 NEAR-SITE EMERGENCY CENTER Your assistance in this matter is appreciated.
If there are further questions, please feel free to contact Mr. J.
W. Shannon at (509) 375-5825.
Very truly yours, D. L.
RENBERGER Assistant Director - Technology rch Attachment cc:
B.
K. Grimes, NRC A. Bournia, NRC M. D. Lynch, NRC N. S. Reynolds, Debevoise 5 Liberman
Date:
Tot INTER0FFICE MEM0RAN0%8 WASHINGTONPUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEhf RECEl >~-D JUN l 2 196U June ll, 1980 than. $HA SHANNON K. T. Perkins/D.
L. Renberger/L.
L. Grumme/F.
D. McElwee From. W.
K. Stockdale,
- Manager, Engineering Services Subject; NGP-058~
PROPOSED SITE FOR THE COMBINED PLANT SERVICES AND EMERGENCY COORDINATION FACILITY FOR 'WNP-l, 2, AND 4 Distribution:
D EDC WNP-1t4 D EDC WNP.2 0 EDC WNP.315 Ql Admin File N GP- 058 GF Bailey--515 w/a WC Bibb--825 w/a RW Craig--435 w/o JW Draper--575 w/o MD Furman-;305 w/a AD Kohler 818 w/a BK McLeod--555 w/a AC Rutz--535 w/o
-" JW Shannon 440 w/a.
HW Stivers.420 w/o EES-WKS-80-066 Attached is a copy of a report which recommends that the subject facility be located in the southwest corner of Supply System leased real estate-on the Hanford reservation.
By copy of this memorandum, I request your concurrence on this site as the location for the -subject facility.
WKS:nm W.. K. STOCKDALE, Manager En i ring Services t
Concurrence byte(
. T.
PERKINS Assistant Director, Generation D. L.
RENBERGER Assistant Director, Technology
. L.
GRUMME, Manager Administrativ Ser ices Operations F.
D.
MCELWEE Assistant Director, Projects WP l02 ir
IHOEROFFICE MEM0RAQUM WASH1NGTON PUBUC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM Distribution:
0 EDC WNP-1/4 D EDC WNP-2 CI EDC WNP-3/5 El Admin File NGP-058 Date:
May 7, 1980 To:
W.
K. Stockdale,
- Manager, Engineering Services Frornt H.
W. Stivers, Supervisor, Facilities Engineering
'ubject:
FACILITY SITE SELECTI 0>
RW Crai g--435 JW Draper--575 AC Rutz--535 M3 Simmons--495 EES-HWS-80-110 The following personnel met on April '8, 1980, to finalize siting criteria and recommend.a site location for the proposed Combined Plant Services and Emergency Coordination'acility.
R.
W. Craig, Supervisor, Radiological Ser.vices J.
W. Draper, Supervisor, Maintenance Engineering A. C. Rutz, Engineer I, Environmental Programs H.
W. Stivers, Supervisor, Facilities Engineering The following basic criteria were established.
1)
The near-site Emergency Operations Facility should be within one mile of the reactor (P 44, NUREG 0654, FEMA-REP-1).
In this case, the term "Emergency Operations Facility is synony-mous with "Emergency Coordinatton Facility," "Emergency Coordina-tion Center,"
and "Recovery Center."
2)
The facility should be located within the Exclusion Area Boundary of the nuclear site to preclude additional state licensing require-ments..
3)
Availabilityof'tilities (water, electricity, sanitary waste
- disposal, communication links).
4)
Elevation of site should preclude flooding of subsurface struc-.
tures and be reasonable for future railroad access.
5)
Reasonable access to roads and railroad.
6)
Wind direction from the reactor(s) to the Emergency Coordina-tion Facility should be favorable to the minimizing of contamina-tion and exposure of airborne radioactivity in the event of a serious accident.
(See attachment A.)
WP.102 R2
~
~
H.
K. Stockdale Page Two May 7, 1980 FACILITY SITE SELECTION 7)
Require maintenance'hop access during recovery from a nuclear accident.
8)
Prefer to locate on existing WPPSS leased property within the Hanford Reservation rather than seeking addi.tional leased land at this time from the Department of Energy.
9)
Site location should avoid fall-out from cooling tower plume dur ing normal operation of the plant.
(See attachment B for deposition pattern.
These locations are also shown on the attached RPPSS drawing F-C-1-003.).
10)
An unobstructed line of sight is required between the rooftops of the Emergency Coordination Facility and the reactor build-ing(s) and Multipurpose Facility (MPF).
(See attachnent B,}.
The following tabulation provides a more detailed evalua,ti.on of the wind direction and velocity from each of the nuclear reactors to each of the site locations.
Refer to attachment A for the MI'ND ROSE at the 33 ft. level.
TABLE 1 WIND ROSE'ATA '
SUMMARY
Nuclear Reactor Direction (Percent of Time}
Site A
.Site 8
Site C
Average Hind Speed (MPH},
Site A
Site B
Site C
MNP-1 2~3 4-5 5-6 13-18 13<<1 8 13-1 8 WNP-2 WNP-4 3-4 5-6 6-7 8-1 2
=
13-l 8 13-1 8 3-4 10-11 7-8 13-18 25 up 25 up The results of the wind rose indicate that Site A has the lessor wind direction and velocity than Sites B and C.
Therefore, Site A
is the preferred locati'on.
Table 2 below weights the criteria requirements in comparison of three selected locations for the proposed facility.
Weighting is an arbitrary numerical value 0 to 10 with 10 being the most responsive to the basic criteria.
Each basic criteria is assumed to have the same degree of importance.
Distribution Page Three May', 1980 FACILITY SITE SELECTION TABLE 2 SITE LOCATION EVALUATION Basic Criteria 1)
Locate within one mile of reactor Site A
Site B
Site C
10 2)
Locate within exclusion area')
Availability of utilities 4)
Ground elevation at site 5)
Road and railroad access 6)
Mind direction 7)
Maintenance shop access 8)
On HPPSS leased property 9)
Avoid cooling tower drift
'I 10)
Unobstructed line of sight (Microwave loop system)
RATING SUMMATION 10 10 10 83 10 3
>5 10 63 10'0 10 Site A most nearly satisfies the basic criteria established for identifying the preferred location.
Therefore, it is recommended that the proposed Combined Plant Services and Emergency Coordination Facility be located at Site A.
(See MPPSS drawing F-C-1-003, attached.)
HHS:nm Concurrence by:
H. H.
STIVERS, Supervisor Facilities Engineering R.
W. CRA, Supervisor Radiol ogi al Engineering
. H. Draper, Supervisor
'nte an gineering A.
. Rutz, Engi er I Environmental Pr ams