ML17272A961

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 800226 Site Visit W/Caseload Forecast Panel in Hanford,Wa Re Factors Affecting Const Schedule & Observation of Const Activities
ML17272A961
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 04/24/1980
From: Lynch M
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8005140237
Download: ML17272A961 (14)


Text

MEETING SUYd4>RY DISTR I BUT IOll acket File NRC PDR Local PDR TIC - NSIC NRR Reading LWR¹4 File H. Denton E.

Case H. Berkow W. Russell D.

Ross D. Yassallo S.

Yarga J. Stolz R. Baer

0. Parr L. Rubenstei n C. Heltemes L. Crocker F. Williams R. Mattson R.

DeYoung Project Manager M.

D. Lynch

Attorney, ELD Licensing Assistant IE (3)

ACRS (16)

R. Denise NRC

Participants:

M, D. Lynch W. Lovelace A. D. Toth J. Rothfleisch T. Abell G. Matthews S.

Boyd L. Schaub 800 00gg ~0~

APE ac

)g80

1 APR 2,4 1980 Docket No.:

50-397 V

APPLICANT:

WPPSS (Washington Public Pointer Supply System)

FACILITY:

WNP-2

SUBJECT:

CASELOAD FORECAST PANEL SITE VISIT TO WNP-,2 ON FEBRUARY 26, 1980 The Casel'oad Forecast Panel visited the s'ite of the WNP-2 facility on February 26, 1980.

The purpose of this visit was to discuss a number of factors affecting the construction schedule of this facility and to conduct a site tour including observation of construction activities.

A listing of those participating in the morning discussion is attached.

,The CFP's most recent site visit was June 14, 1978.

'The 'morning discussion was primarily concerned with an overview of the construction progress since the Ouhe 1978 visit, including an update on construction progress, a* discussion of major milestones completed, current problems and any anticipated problems.

The major areas. that were considered in the discussion were the con-tinuing labor productivity problems and the effect of rework on the sacrificial shield on the schedule.'PPSS personnel indicat'ed that they did not anticipate any delays associated with material supply inasmuch as they had either shipped'he required material and components.to the site i0 advance of need or had ready access to required materials and components.

WPPSS"personnel a'Iso indicate'd they did not anticipate any delays associated with the ongoing program to define.

the pool dynamic loads of the Mark II containment.,

WPPSS management concluded, however, that its estimated fuel load date of March 1981 would slip to July 1982; During the afternoon tour of the site, the CFP went through all the significant portions of the facility. It was observed that additional work remains to be completed in 'the wet well and a considerable amount of work remains to be done in the control room.

About 80 percent of, the electrical and instrumentation cables have been pulled; almost all of the cable trays appear to have been installed.

While most of the piping systems have been installed, a considerable amount of piping is still being installed.

One of the management techniques recently adopted for coordinating construction activities of different crafts appears to be working very effc~tively.

In this approach, a'ingle individual is responsible for scheduling and coordinating all crafts in each area.

These area managers, in turn,.are par t of an integrated team composed of WPPSS and AISLE personnel.

At the exit interview on February 28, 1980, the CFP stated its belief that WPPSS'stimate of July 1982 for a fuel load date app'ears reasonable at this time.

However, the RC staff expressed its concerns about the potential for delay in the co

~ Schedule due to:

orrIca~

CtIRNAMLW DATa~

......PJA;.L.WR-..4 MDLynch/j1 4/g,$

/80

~

J 4

~

stein 4/ 23- /80 MLC EORM 318 (9-76) NRCR 0240 4 U 4 OOVNRNMRNT tRINTINO Orrlcat I)tt ttt Ttt

4 I

~e E',

1 ip,PR 24 1980 (1) the inspection, rework and documentation of Ithe flaHs i the sacrificial shield; (2) the tight confinement in the wet well, especially welding of the omega seal; I

r (3) the lime to conduct geological, seismological'and structural reevaluations in li'ght of recent geologic phenomena south and southwest 'of the site; and-(4) the impact of the Action Plans (NUREG-0660) onIlNP-2."

The staff finished its exit interview, by complimenting the llPPSS management and personnel fot a well coordinated, straightforward presentation in the morning'iscussion and for a thorough well-guided tour in the afternoon.~

Or.igin82-siSned by,:

II N. D. Lynch, Projt'.ct thnager, Light 'ltater Reactors Branch No. 4 Division of Project ftanagement

Attachment:

As stated cc w(attachment:

, See next page OQNNAM4&

OAT4~

~ %ARM 518 (9-76) NRCM 0240 4 U 4 OOV4NNMNNT ~NINT1NO ONNIC4'

~ TT TII

'70t

~

1 ~

~

~ ~ \\ ~ ~ ~

Cj3

~

0 I

/

h

'4

'r

,~A VI

,i ~

'(4~8 REC(I

~o I'y

~~a n

<<+*++

Docket No.:

50-397 UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 APR 24 1980 APPLICANT:

WPPSS (Washington Public Power Supply System)

FACILITY:

WNP-2

SUBJECT:

CASELOAD FORECAST PANEL SITE VISIT TO WNP-2 ON FEBRUARY 26, 1980 The Caseload Forecast Panel visited the site of the WNP-2 facility on February 26, 1980.

The purpose of this visit was to discuss a number of factors affecting

'he construction schedule of this facility and to conduct a site tour includihg observation of construction activities.

A listing of those participati'ng in the morning discussion is attached.

The CFP's most recent site visit was June 14 1978.

The morning discussion was primarily concerned with an overview of the construction progress since the June 1978 visit, including an update on construction progress, a discussion of major milestones completed, current problems and any anticipated problems.

The major areas that were considered in the discussion were the con-tinuing labor productivity problems and the effect of rework on the sacrificial shield on the schedule.

WPPSS personnel indicated that they did not anticipate any delays associated with material supply inasmuch as they had either shipped the required material and components to the site in advance of need or had ready access to required materials and components.

WPPSS personnel also indicated they did not anticipate any delays associated with the ongoing program to define the pool dynamic loads of the Mark II containment.

WPPSS management concluded, however, that its estimated fuel load date of March 1981 would slip to July 1982.

During the afternoon tour of the site, the CFP went through all the significant portions of the facility. It was observed that additional work remains to be completed in the wet well and a considerable amount of work remains to be done in the control room.

About 80 percent of the electrical and instrumentation cables have been pulled; almost all of the cable trays appear to have been installed.

While most of the piping systems have been installed, a considerable amount of piping is still being installed.

One of the management techniques recently adopted for coordinating construction activities of different crafts appears to be working very effectively.

In this approach, a single individual is responsible for scheduling and coordinating all crafts in each area.

These area

managers, in turn, are part of an integrated team composed of WPPSS and ARE personnel, At the exit interview on February 28, 1980, the CFP stated its belief that HPPSS'stimate of July 1982 for a fuel load date appears reasonable at this time.

However, the NRC staff expressed its concerns about the potential for delay in the construction schedule due to:

f t

2 APR 24 1980 (1) the inspection, rework and documentation of the flaws in the sacrificial shield; (2) the tight confinement in the wet well, especially welding of the omega seal; (3) the time to conduct geological, seismological and structui al reevaluations in light of recent geologic phenomena south and southwest of the site; and (4) the impact of the Action Plans (NUREG-0660) on WNP-2, The staff finished its exit interview by complimenting the WPPSS management and personnel for a well coordinated, straightforward presentation in the morning discussion and for a thorough well-guided tour in the afternoon.

Attachment:

As stated M.

D. Lynch, oject Manager Light Water Reactors Branch No. 4 Division of Project Management cc w/attachment:

See next page

l f

Washington Public Power Supply System APR 24

>980 ccs:

Joseph B. Knotts, Jr.,

Esq.

Debevoise 8 Liberman 1200 Seventeenth

Street, N.

W.

Washington, D. C.

20036 Richard Q. Quigley, Esq.

Washington Public Power Supply System P. 0.

Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352 Nicholas Lewis, Chairman Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council 820 East Fifth Avenue Olympia, Washington 98504 Mr. 0. K. Earle Licensing Engineer P. 0.

Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352 Resident Inspector/WPPSS-2 NPS c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0.

Box 69 Richland, Washington 99352 Mr. Neil 0. Strand Washington Public Power Supply System P. 0.

Box 968

Richland, Washington 99352

~<<g I

I C

,i II

ATTACHMENT List of Attendees Februar 26 1980 WNP-2 Facilit Name J.

D.

H. L.

D. L.

J.

P.

W. A.

W. C.

J.

R.

C.

R.

G. I.

A. D.

Martin Perkins Renberger Thomas Goodman Bibb Lewis Bryant Wells Kohler K. Earle M. D. Lynch W. Lovelace A.

D. Toth C. Taylor Pat Powell G.

C.

Sorensen WPPSS NRC NRC NRC Resident WPPSS WPPSS WPPSS WPPSS WPPSS WPPSS WPPSS WPPSS WPPSS BPA BPA WPPSS WPPSS

(

~I