ML17265A215

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards SALP Rept 50-244/98-99 for Period of 960825- 980221.Schedule of Planned NRC Insp of Plant for Next Yr Also Encl.Overall Performance at Plant Good
ML17265A215
Person / Time
Site: Ginna 
Issue date: 04/09/1998
From: Miller H
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Mecredy R
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
Shared Package
ML17265A216 List:
References
50-244-98-99, NUDOCS 9804150015
Download: ML17265A215 (7)


See also: IR 05000244/1998099

Text

~

CATEGORY Q

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9804150015

DOC.DATE: 98/04/09

NOTARIZED: NO

DOCKET 0

FACIL:50-244 Robert

Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester

G

05000244

AUTH.NAME

AUTHOR AFFILIATION

MILLER,H.J.

Region

1 (Post

820201)

RECIP.NAME

RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

MECREDY,R.C.

Rochester

Gas

E Electric Corp.

SUBJECT:

Forwards

SALP for 960825 to 980221.Assessment

conducted

using revised

SALP process

implemented by NRC on 930719.

Overall performance

good, improvements

made in number of

areas

to address

previous weaknesses.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

IE40D

COPIES

RECEIVED:LTRI ENCL 3

SIZE: f+7

TITLE: Systematic

Assessment

of Licensee

Performance

(~S

P) Report

NOTES:License

Exp date in accordance

with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72)

.

E

05000244

G

RECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

PD1-1 LA

VISSING,G.

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

1

1

1

RECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

PD1-1

PD

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

1

0

INTERNAL: COMKCRSION

ILE CE

OLB

NRR/DRPM/PERB

OE DIR

RGN1

FILE

01

EXTERNAL: L ST LOBBY WARD

NOAC

5

5

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

DEDRO

NRR/DRCH/HHFB

NRR/DRPM/PECB

NUDOCS-ABSTRACT

OGC/HDS3

LITCO BRYCE, J H

NRC PDR

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

D

N

NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE. HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS

OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL

DESK

(DCD)

ON EXTENSION 415-2083

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES

REQUIRED: LTTR

22

ENCL

22

April 9,

1998

Dr. Robert C. Mecredy

Vice President,

Ginna Nuclear Operations

Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation

89 East Avenue

Rochester,

NY 14649

SUBJECT:

SYSTEMATICASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE (SALP) REPORT

NO. 50-244/98-99 FOR THE R. E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Dear Dr. Mecredy:

This letter forwards the R. E. Ginna SALP report for the period of August 25, 1996 to

February 21, 1998 (Enclosure

1) ~ This assessment

was conducted using the revised SALP

process that was implemented by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on July 19,

1993.

In this process the NRC staff evaluates the performance of licensees

in four

functional areas: Operations, Maintenance,

Engineering, and Plant Support.

The Plant

Support area includes

Radiological Controls, Security, Emergency Preparedness,

Fire

Protection, Chemistry, and Housekeeping.

Overall, performance at the Ginna Station was generally good; improvements were made in

a number of areas to address previous weaknesses.

Conservative decision making was

evident this period.

This performance was exemplified by the main transformer outage in

November 1996, during which the station made progress

in identifying and repairing

equipment problems, some of which were longstanding.

The outage was followed by an

extended period of stable plant operation, good plant equipment performance, and

improved interfaces between plant organizations. Management oversight of motor operated

valve and service water system issues improved, but implementation of the programs

continued to be a challenge.

Lapses in oversight resulted in some poor radiological work

practices.

Some lapses were also noted with operator control of plant configuration.

In

addition, procedure quality and adherence

problems occurred throughout the SALP period,

particularly in the maintenance

area.

Operations was rated Category 2. Performance

in plant operations was normally very

good.

Operator response to plant transients,

and control of startups and shutdowns,

co'ntinued to be good.

During the period, management

involvement and oversight were

normally evident, and were reflected in sustained

safe and stable plant operations.

Steps

were taken to address problems with Technical Specification interpretations seen in the

previous period.

Operations communications and interactions with other site organizations

were generally good throughout the period.

However, some lapses in operators'ontrol of

work and plant configuration occurred.

Examples included the inadvertent draining of

reactor makeup water to the waste holdup tank and the inadvertent opening of a reactor

coolant system power-operated relief valve.

9804i500i5 980409

PDR

ADQCK 05000244

8

PDR

OFFICIAL RECORD

COPY

1Er40

Robert C. Mecredy

Maintenance was rated Category 2. During this period, maintenance

activities were

generally effective.

Improvements were made to address

some past weaknesses

in

maintenance

processes.

Development and implementation of an integrated work schedule

improved the overall quality and timeliness of maintenance work and yielded improvements

in communication and coordination among operations, maintenance,

and engineering

organizations.

Management oversight of maintenance

improved and contributed to more

prompt identification and resolution of equipment deficiencies.

Progress was made in

addressing

and reducing the maintenance

backlog, yet the backlog remained high at the

end of the SALP period.

Some instances of inadequate

procedure adherence

and difficulty

with implementing maintenance administrative requirements were experienced during the

SALP period.

Engineering was rated Category 2. The system engineering group brought an increased

presence of design and licensing experience onsite and increased the ability of the system

engineers to support resolution of day-to-day problems in the plant.

Engineering work was

generally well controlled, as illustrated by good engineering work products and support of

troubleshooting efforts.

Progress was made in resolving some prior performance issues

associated with the auxiliary feedwater and service water systems.

Engineering

performance was good regarding control of the Ginna Station design basis.

However,

performance in some engineering areas was mixed.

For example, completion of the motor

operated valve program and some longstanding unresolved service water items continued

to challenge engineering.

Also, problems were noted with the vendor manual program.

Performance

in Plant Support was rated Category 2. Radioactive waste processing and

transportation were effectively managed and continued to exhibit a high level of

performance.

Improving trends in radiation exposure and personnel contaminations were

observed.

Weaknesses

in radiological boundary controls were identified early in the period

but improvements were made through training and management oversight.

Fire protection

was generally very good.

Emergency planning continued to perform well. Housekeeping

in

the Auxiliary Building has improved; however, housekeeping

deficiencies in the

containment during the refueling outage were observed.

Performance

in the area of

security declined, with weaknesses

noted in the fitness for duty program and the

implementation of the Vehicle Barrier System.

Enclosure 2 provides the schedule and basis for the NRC inspections of your facility

planned for the next year,

We willinform you of any changes required to the attached

inspection schedule.

The routine resident inspection effort is not included in this schedule.

Robert C. Mecredy

We have scheduled

a management meeting with you to discuss our assessment.

The

meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m. on April 22, 1998, at the Ginna Training Center and will

be open for public observation.

At the meeting, you and your staff should be prepared to

discuss our assessment

and any initiatives you.plan to take to address the weaknesses

identified in our assessment.

We appreciate your cooperation.

Sincerely,

Hubert J.

Miller

Regional Administrator

Docket-No. 50-244

Enclosures:

1. Systematic Assessment

of Licensee Performance

(SALP) Report

No. 50-244/98-99

2. Planned NRC Inspections for Ginna

cc w/encls:

R. Smith, Senior Vice President, Energy Operations

Central Records (7 copies)

P. Eddy, Electric Division, Department of Public Service, State of New York

C. Donaldson, Esquire, State of New York, Department of Law

N. Reynolds, Esquire

F. William Valentino, President, New York State Energy Research

and Development Authority

J. Spath, Program Director, New York State Energy Research

and Development Authority

Chairman Jackson

Commissioner Dicus

Commissioner Diaz

Commissioner McGaffigan

Institute for Nuclear Power Operations (INPO)

Robert C. Mecredy

Distribution w/encls:

H. Miller, RA/W. Axelson, DRA (1)

D. Screnci, PAO (2)

Region

I Docket Room (with concurrences)

PUBLIC

NRC Resident Inspector

'Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

J. Wiggins, DRS Director

L. Nicholson, DRS Deputy Director

L. Doerflein, DRP

DRS Branch Chiefs

J. Lanning, DRP

S. Barr, DRP

R. Ragland, DRS

L. Prividy, DRS

M. Oprendek,

DRP

R. Junod, DRP

Distribution w/encls (VIAE-MAIL):

B. McCabe, Rl EDO Coordinator

J. Callan, EDO

S. Collins, NRR

B. Boger, NRR

J: Lieberman, OE (2) (OEMAIL)

P. Drysdale, Ginna

S. Bajwa, NRR

G. Vissing, NRR

M. Campion, ORA

Inspection Program Branch, NRR (IPAS)

R. Correia, NRR

F. Talbot, NRR

Distribution via E-Mail:

Region

I Staff (Refer to SALP Drive)

DOCUMENT NAME: GABRANCH1iGIN-SALP.98

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box:

"Cu = Copy without a

chment/enclosure

uE"

Copy with attachment/enclosure

"N" = No copy

OFFICE

RI/DRP

RI/DRP

RI/DRP

RI/DR

NRR/P

.1

RI/ORA

NAME

DATE

SBarr

LDoerflein

03/gf/98

.

034,g/98

LNi

on

03/g> /98

JCrlenjak

03/2, 98

OFFICIAL

ECORD COPY

SBajwa

03/dp /98

HMiller

/98