ML17264B012

Forwards FFD Performance Data for Ginna Station for Six Months Ending 970630

ML17264B012
Person / Time
Site:	Ginna
Issue date:	08/27/1997
From:	Hessler N, Mecredy R ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To:	NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned), NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9709040311
Download: ML17264B012 (7)

Text

CATEGORY 1 REGULATE INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION

.STEM (RIDS)

I

,.~'ACCESSION NBR:9709040311 DOC.DATE: 97/08/27 NOTARIZED: NO FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G

AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION HESSLER,N.D.

Rochester Gas 6 Electric Corp.

MECREDY,R.C.

Rochester Gas a Electric Corp.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Forwards FFD Performance Data for Ginna Station for six months ending 970630.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

A021D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: "Semiannual Fitness for Duty Program Performance Rept/Data" NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).

DOCKET 05000244 A'0CFR26.7 T

05000244 E

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-1 PD INTERN ILE CENTER NUDOCS-A'BSTRACT EXTERNAL: NOAC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME VISSING,G.

NRR/DRPM/PSGB RGNl NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 D

NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD)

ON EXTENSION 415" 2083 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR 8

ENCL 8

c.

~.

i a'-e l

AND ROCHESTER GASANDELECTRIC CORPORATION ~ 89 EASTAVENUE, ROCHESTER, N. Y 146d9-0001 AREA CODE7I6 546-2700 August 27, 1997 Office ofNuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Mail Stop P 1-137 Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:

According to the provisions ofNRC Rule 10CFR Part 26.71(d), please find enclosed is the Fitness For Duty Performance Data for the six months ending June 30, 1997.

Ifyou have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact us.

Very truly yours, Nancy D. Hess er Group Manager Human Resource Services Robert C. Mecredy Vice President Nuclear Operations 970'P0403ii 970827 P DR ADDCK"05000244 R

PDR II!IIIIIII/////////////////I////////////

Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation June 30, 1997 6 Monica Ending Ginna Station, Lake Road,

Ontario, NY Loca Don Lynn I.

Hauck (716) 771-2232 Phone tinctode gaea code)

Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml)

M Appendix A to iOCFR 26, except as listed below:

Marijuana Cocaine Opiates 50 ml'5 ml Amphetamines

/

Phencyclidine

/

Alcohol (% BAC)

Testing Results Average Number witt Unescorted Access Licensee Employees 552 Long-Term Contractor Personnel 63 Short-Term Contractor Personnel 113 Categories Tested

¹ Positive

¹ Tested

¹ Positive

¹ Tested

¹ Positive Prehccess 37 71 ll O

O to Post accident Observed behavior Random 176 26 54 Follow-up 10 0'ther 0

Total 223 29 131 ttEv. 1/92

~

~ I I

I I

I '

I l

N I

~ '

I Vr aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa RESRRSRll888%8

~N4HHHHSIHRRHH 55WR5558555%5&~~~&55

ROCHESTER GAS ANDELECTRIC CORPO TION GINNA,STATION PERFORMANCE DATAFORM SEMI-ANNUALREPORT Six Months Ending June 30, 1997 Y

F A

EME TA Tl FFD PR RAM No significant program changes or events occurred in the six months ending June 30, 1997.

RG&E's annual testing rate is 50%.

R In ecti n 0-244 The inspection ofthe FFD Program was conducted April28-30, 1997. The inspector found the program to satisfactorily meet regulatory requirements.

The inspector also reviewed the corrective actions taken for deficiencies related to two previously identified FFD violations with the followingresults:

(Closed) VIO 50-244/96-10-01: Failure to Provide Required FFD Supervisor Refresher Training (Closed) VIO 50-244/96-10-02: Failure to Test Persons Selected for Random FFD Testing Conclusion Based on reviews of applicable documentation and discussions with FFD management, the inspector determined that the corrective actions implemented to address the subject violations were reasonable,

complete, and appeared to be effective.

4

• (

'4

~

e rx y 1.

q I '