ML17264B009

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation as Result of Notification from Rochester Gas & Electric Corp, .Licensee Used Marijuana as Evidenced by Confirmed Positive Test for That Drug Resulting from Urine Sample Submitted on 970701
ML17264B009
Person / Time
Site: Ginna 
Issue date: 08/26/1997
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML17264B008 List:
References
IA-97-069, IA-97-69, NUDOCS 9709030432
Download: ML17264B009 (1)


Text

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Mr. Bruce Sensenbach

[HOME ADDRESS DELETED UNDER 10 CFR 2.790(a)]

Docket No. 55-60055 License No. SOP-10948-1 IA 97-069 As a result of a notification from the Rochester Gas 5 Electric Corp, dated

'ugust 15, 1997, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.

In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG-1600, the violation is listed below:

10 CFR 55.53(j) prohibits licensees from using any illegal drugs.

Contrary to the above, the licensee used marijuana as evidenced by a confirmed positive test for that drug resulting from a urine sample submitted on July 1, 1997.

This is a Severity Level III violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Bruce Sensenbach is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Regional Administrator, Region I, 475 Allendale Rd., King of Prussia, PA 19406, and marked "Open by Addressee Only" and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the

~

Ginna station, with a similar marking within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of V'olation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:

(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Under the authority of Section 182 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 2232, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.

Dated at King of Prussia, PA this 26th day of August 1997 9'709030432 97082b PDR ADQCK 05000244 6

PDR