ML17264A806
| ML17264A806 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 01/24/1997 |
| From: | Vissing G NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Mecredy R ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| References | |
| TAC-M97553, NUDOCS 9701300053 | |
| Download: ML17264A806 (5) | |
Text
31 f
January 24, 997 Dr. Robert C. Mecredy Vice President, Nuclear Operations Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, NY 14649
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR= ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REVIEW OF REVISED SUBMITTAL OF QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR STATION OPERATION OF DECEMBER 13, 1996 R.
E.
GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION (TAC NO. M97553)
Dear Dr. Mecredy:
We are in the process of reviewing your revised submittal of Quality Assurance Program for Station Operation of December 13, 1996.
In order to complete our review, we have determined the need for additional information.
The enclosed Request for Additional Information provides our concerns for additional information.
Please provide your response within 45 days from receipt of this letter.
~cD l Sincer'ely',,
),
I(
/s/
/-
t Guy S. Vissing;-,Senior Project Manager Projectt.Directorate I-1 Division of Reactor Projects I/II Officeof Nuclear,,Reactor Regulation ll Docket No. 50-244
~ma~em) 6$,
Enclosure:
Request',,for'Additional Information,
'@~
/gal DISTRIBUTION:
Docket File J. Zwolinski
~OGC
'UBLIC S.
- Bajwa',
~.
'CRS PDI-1 R/F S. Little
'.,Doerflein, Region I S.
Varga G., Vissing M.=.Bugg i
fl H
DOCUMENT NAME:
G:
GINNA M97553.RAI To receive a copy of this document;,indicate in the, box:
"C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Co y with attachment enclosure "N" = No co y OFFICE PH:PDI-1 E
LA:PDI-1 D:PDI-1 HRR:HOHB HAHE GVissing/rsl SLittl SBajwa SBlack DATE 01/ H97 01/
97 01/4 /97 0
>cia Recor Copy 01/ +97 I
9'70l300053 970i24 PDR'
'ADOCK 05000244 P
kl J
T II
'll
'f Lf lj h
+'J 4
~ /
P i,-
l1 "I
/>>'r,'p l<
t fg jl t
C' IP L
ti I
I Q
$i
'1tl
'/
Ji~'f l
gP,A RK0Ij P0 Cy A,
Cl 0 $
~O
~+*<<+
UNITED STATES t N CLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 2055&0001 January 24, 1997 Dr. Robert C. Mecredy Vice President, Nuclear Operations Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, NY 14649
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REVIEW OF REVISED SUBMITTAL OF QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR STATION OPERATION OF DECEMBER 13, 1996 R.
E.
GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION (TAC NO. M97553)
Dear Dr. Mecredy:
We are in the process of reviewing your revised submittal of Quality Assurance Program for Station Operation of December 13, 1996.
In order to complete our review, we have determined the need for additional information.
The enclosed Request for Additional Information provides our concerns for additional information.
Please provide your response within 45 days from receipt of this letter.
Sincerely, Guy
. Vissing, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate I-l Division of Reactor Projects I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-244
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information
Dr. Robert C. Mecredy R.E.
Ginna Nuclear Power Plant CC:
Peter D. Drysdale, Senior Resident Inspector R.E.
Ginna Plant U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1503 Lake Road
- Ontario, NY 14519 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Hr.
F. William Valentino, President New York State
- Energy, Research, and Development Authority Corporate Plaza West 286 Washington Avenue Extension
- Albany, NY 12203-6399 Charlie Donaldson, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General New York Department of Law 120 Broadway New York, NY 10271 Nicholas S.
Reynolds Winston 5 Strawn 1400 L St.
N.W.
Washington, DC 20005-3502 Ms. Thelma Wideman
- Director, Wayne County Emergency Management Office Wayne County Emergency Operations Center 7336 Route 31
- Lyons, NY 14489 Ms. Mary Louise Heisenzahl Administrator, Monroe County Office of Emergency Preparedness ill West Fall Road, Room 11 Rochester, NY 14620 Hr. Paul Eddy New York State Department of Public Service 3 Empire State
- Plaza, Tenth Floor
- Albany, NY 12223
RE VEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATING TO REVISION 23 TO " A PROGRAM FOR STATION OPERATION" R.
E.
GINNA NUCLEAR POWER STATION DOCKET NO. 50-244 On Page 19 of your Quality Assurance Program (QAP), Revision 23, it appears you have submitted a reduction in commitment.
In Revision 22 of your QAP, you committed to Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.33, Rev.
(2) Position Sa.
Please show where you have committed to RG 1.33, Rev.
(2) Position 5a in Revision 23 of your QAP. If you are not committing to Position 5a of RG 1.33, Rev.
(2) then please discuss and explain your reasons by giving justification for the reduction in commitment.
Back round of Re ulator Guide 1.33 Revision 2
REGULATORY POSITION 5.
The guidelines (indicated by the verb "should" ) of ANSI N18.7-1976/ANS-3.2 contained in the following sections have sufficient safety importance to be treated the same as the requirements (indicated by the verb "shall" ) of the standard:
a.
Section 4.4The guidelines concerning review activities of the onsite operating organization, except the guideline that refers to screening subjects of potential concern.
ANSI N18.7-1976 ANS-32 4.4 Review Activities of the Onsite Operating Organization.
The onsite operating organization shall provide, as part of the normal duties of plant supervisory personnel, timely and continuing monitoring of operating activities to assist the Plant Manager in keeping abreast of general plant conditions and to verify that the day-to-day operating activities are conducted safely and in accordance with applicable administrative controls.
These continuing monitoring activities are considered to be an integral part of the routine supervisory function and are important to the safety of plant operation, The onsite operating organization should perform reviews periodically and as situations
- demand, to evaluate plant operations and to plan future activities.
The important elements of the reviews should be documented.
Such reviews serve a useful purpose but shall not take the place of the reviews and audits described in Sections 4.3 and 4.5, respectively.
The onsite operating organization should screen subjects of potential concern to independent reviewers and perform preliminary investigations (see 4.3.4).
The Plant Manager, in carrying out his responsibility for overall safety of plant operations; shall be responsible for timely referral of appropriate matters to management and independent reviewers.
Encl osut e