ML17264A316

Ack Receipt of Region I Plant Performance Review for Ginna Station,

ML17264A316
Person / Time
Site:	Ginna
Issue date:	01/09/1996
From:	Mecredy R ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To:	Cooper R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
NUDOCS 9601180286
Download: ML17264A316 (3)

Text

CATEGORY 1 I

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDE)

ACCESSION NBR:9601180286

- DOC.DATE: 96/Ol/09 NOTARIZED: NO FACIL:50-'244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G

AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MECREDY,R.C.

Rochester Gas 6 Electric Corp.

RECI P. NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION COOPERFR.

Region 1 (Post 820201)

SUBJECT:

Ack receipt of Region I plant:peiformance review for Ginna Station,dtd 951020.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

IE01D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).

DOCKET ¹ 05000244 T

05000244 E

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-1 PD INTERNAL: AEOD/DEIB AEOD/TTC NRR DRCH/HHFB NRR/DRPM/PERB OE DIR RGN1 FILE 01 EXTERNAL: LITCO BRYCE,J H

NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME JOHNSON,A AEOD/SPD/RAB DEDRO NRR/DISP/PIPB NRR/DRPM/PECB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS3 NOAC COPIES LTTR ENCL D

E N

NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE!

CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM OWFN SD-5(EXT. 415-2083)

TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR 18 ENCL 323

O.

4ND ROCHESTER GAS ANDElECTRIC CORPORATION

~ 89 FASTAtrrENUE, ROCHESTER, N. V Id6d9-II AREA CODE 716 546 2700 ROBERT C. MECREDY Vice President hlvcleor operations January 9,

1996 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I II Attn:

Mr. Richard Cooper II, Director Division of Reactor Projects 475 Allendale Road

,King of Prussia, PA 19406

Subject:

Ginna Plant Performance Review Results R.E.

Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-244

Dear Mr. Cooper:

We acknowledge receipt of the Region I Plant Performance Review (PPR) for Ginna

Station, dated October 20, 1995.

We are pleased that notation was made of the generally good performance of the plant and our personnel during the PPR time period.

We do, however, believe that comments regarding corrective action thresholds and Radiation Work Permit compliance weaknesses warrant response.

We agree that ACTION reports could have been generated for the noted occurrences.

During the initial few months of operating under the new Nuclear Interface Procedure, "Abnormal Condition Tracking Initiation or Notification (Action) Report,"

(IP-CAP-1), all ACTION reports were reviewed by a single entity (the Operating Experience Group) so as to make a judgment on the level of uniformity in ACTION report generation.

Based on this effort, recommendations were made to modify the proce-dure, including an extensive list of examples to be used as guidance on the expected threshold for initiation of an ACTION report.

Revision 2

to IP-CAP-1 was issued on October 24, 1995.

Relative to human performance deficiencies regarding the wearing of secondary alarming personnel dosimetry when entering radiologically controlled areas, actions by our plant manager as noted in his October 24 memo to all personnel have been initiated to prevent further such occurrences.

9bOii8028b 9b0109 PDR ADQCK 05000244 8

PDR

.iSO05i

~P(0

Overall, we are satisfied that the issuance of the

PPR, as well as constant communication with our resident inspectors and NRR project manager will foster the high level of dialogue needed by both NRC and RG&E in our regulatory planning process.

Very truly yours, Robert C. Mecredy GJW4401 xc:

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (original)

Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.

20555 Allen R. Johnson (Mail Stop 14B2)

Project Directorate I-1 Washington, D.C.

20555 Larry Doerflein 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Ginna NRC Senior Resident Inspector