ML17264A152
| ML17264A152 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna |
| Issue date: | 08/28/1995 |
| From: | Mecredy R, Peters J ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| To: | Bush L NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9509110085 | |
| Download: ML17264A152 (7) | |
Text
PRIORITY 1 (ACCELERATED RIDS PROCESSING)
REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRXBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:9509110085 DOC.DATE: 95/08/28 NOTARIZED: NO FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G
AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION PETERS,J.W.
Rochester Gas 6 Electric Corp.
MECREDY,R.C.
Rochester Gas
& Electric Corp.
RECIP.NAME RECXPXENT AFFILIATION BUSH, L.
DOCKET 05000244 P
SUBJECT:
Forwards FFD performance data, personnel subject to 10CFR26 rept for six months ending 950630,including summary of specific mgt actions. One reportable event under 10CFR26.73 noted. Summary of event also encl.
DXSTRXBUTION CODE:
A021D COPXES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:
TITLE: "Semiannual -Fitness for Duty Program Pe&r ormance Rept/Data" 10CFR26.7 I 0
NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).
05000244 T
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-1 PD INTERN EE CENTER 1
NRR%DSSA/SPS RGNl EXTERNAL: NOAC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME JOHNSON,A NRR/DRPM/PSGB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 2
2 1
1 1
1 D
0 N
NOTE TO ALL "RIDSn RECIPIENTS PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE!
CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK,, ROOM OWFN 5DS (415-2083)
TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!
TOTAL NUMBER OF, COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 10 ENCL 10
I izzPr~z uiizizvz I"
/ill/I////III IIIIIIIPlll 8K.::::
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION o 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y. 14649-0001 TCLKPHONC
- RC* CODD Tie 546-2700 August 28, 1995 Mr. Loren Bush Reactor Safeguards Branch Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Office ofNuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
Dear Mr. Bush:
In accordance with the provisions of NRC Rule 10CFR Parts 2 and 26, enclosed is the Fitness For Duty Performance Data, Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 report for the six months ending June 30, 1995.
Attached to the Performance Data form is a summary of specific management actions.
During the reporting period, there was one reportable event under 10CFR 26.73. A summary of that event is included in the attachment.
Ifyou have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact us.
Very truly yours, Jeffr W. Pe ers Group Manager Human Resource Services OSGO,~G 9509110085 950828 PDR ADQCK 05000244 PDR
'obert C. Mecre Vice President Nuclear Operations k>(
Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation June 30, 1995 6 Lhniha Ending Ginna Station, Lake Road, Ontario, NY Locadon Lynn I. Hauck Conracr Name (716) 771-2232 Phone (inctude area code)
Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml)
>Gh Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphetamines Phencyclidine Alcohol (% BAC)
Testing Results Licensee Employees Long-Term Contractor Personnel Short-Term Contractor Personnel Average Number witt Unescorted Access Categories 761
¹ Tested
¹ Positive 85 Tested
¹ Positive 172 Tested
¹ Positive Pr~ccess 28 14 574 10 n
O O
(D Post accident Observed behavior Random 205 15 105 Follow-up 12 Other Total 246 29 686 12
o
~
~ I I
I I
II
~
I l
I I
I I
~.:
~ ~.
~
~
s t
I I
I I
~
I I
I I
WW555555 55&WWWW RRWRRRRRS RRWWW&WRR
(1)
Cutoffs:
Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml)
NOTE:
RGkE and all contractors specifically included in RGEcE's Fitness For Duty Program adhere to Appendix A to 10CFR26.
RGB'as approved the Fitness For Duty program of Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
Westinghouse utilizes different cutofflevels for particular drugs and tests for additional drugs not required by the rule; these are listed below.
Drug or
~Dru Class Screen Conf Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphetamines Phencyclidine Barbiturates Benzodiazepines Methadone Methaqualone 20 NRC NRC 300 NRC 300 300 300 300 NRC NRC NRC 300 NRC 300 300 300 300 6/95
ROC -.STER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORP TION GINNA STATION PERFORMANCE DATAFORM SEMI-ANNUALREPORT Six Months Ending June 30, 1995
SUMMARY
OF MANAGEMENTACTIONS DRUG TESTING As indicated on the Performance Data Form, a total of961 drug and alcohol tests were conducted during the reporting period. Of this total, 14, or approximately 1.5/o, were confirmed positive tests.
However, no positive tests resulted from the random testing process, as outlined below.
The following is a breakdown of the random drug and alcohol tests.
Number of Random Dru /Alcohol Tests Number Positive Percent Positive Employees Contractors 205 120 0~/o 0~/o Total 325
'%o There were no random tests that were confirmed positive during the six month period.
RG&E's annual testing rate is 50/o.
MANAGEMENTACTIONS In accordance with the RG&E Fitness For Duty (FFD) Program and Drug and Alcohol Abuse Policy, all employees are automatically referred to the Company's Employee Assistance Program (EAP) whenever there is a violation of the policy, except when an employee resigns or when employment is terminated.
During the reporting period, two (2) employees tested positive.
One employee, in a supervisory position, tested positive for alcohol. The individual was tested followingthe reasonable suspicion testing process.
Appropriate procedures were followed and the results were reported to the NRC according to 10 CFR 26.73.
The employee has been reinstated for unescorted site access following the appropriate EAP assessment and the Company's policy and procedures.
The other employee tested positive for the substance cocaine in the follow-up testing program.
The employee was terminated under the Company's policy directives.
Page 1 of 2
MANAGEMENTACTI S
cont.
During the reporting period, two short-term contractor employees tested positive.
One resulted from a reasonable suspicion test for alcohol.
The other contractor employee had a confirmed positive test for cocaine through the follow-up testing process.
Unescorted site access was immediately revoked for these individuals.
They were notified of an available Employee Assistance Program.
Based on Company policy and procedures, the contractor employees were terminated from the Company's contractor employment.
Page 2 of 2