ML17262B013
| ML17262B013 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 09/23/1992 |
| From: | Andrea Johnson Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Mecredy R ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17262B014 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-M68548, NUDOCS 9209290301 | |
| Download: ML17262B013 (6) | |
Text
~R RECy fl O
IA0 Op
+
gO
++*++
t UNITED STATES t
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 September 23, 1992 Docket No. 50-244 Dr. Robert C. Hecredy Vice President, Nuclear Production Rochester Gas 5 Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, New York 14649
Dear Dr. Hecredy:
SUBJECT:
R.
E.
GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, STATION BLACKOUT RULE (10 CFR 50.63),
SUPPLEMENTAL SAFETY EVALUATION (TAC NO. H68548)
The NRC staff's Safety Evaluation (SE) pertaining to your response to the Station Blackout (SBO) Rule, 10 CFR 50.63, was transmitted to you by letter dated January 30, 1992.
The staff's SE found that your proposed method of coping with an SBO did not conform with the SBO Rule and requested you to submit a revised response addressing the areas of non-conformance.
The SE contained 14 recommendations to bring the plant within conformance with the SBO Rule.
These recommendations contained five requests for additional information.
You provided responses to these requests for additional information by letter dated April 6, 1992.
- However, you did not respond to the remainder of the recommendations.
Your responses were reviewed by an NRC contractor, Science Application International Corporation (SAIC), and the NRC/Division of Systems Technology staff.
Enclosure 1 is our Supplemental Safety Evaluation (SSE) of your response, and Enclosure 2 the associated SAIC Technical Evaluation Report (TER)
SAIC-92/6694, "Supplemental Technical Evaluation Report, R.
E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, Station Blackout Evaluation," dated August 20, 1992.
Bggi fPj g Qf~gl( tIPf' +PP 920929030i 920923 PDR ADOCK 05000244 P
t I P
l I
Dr. Robert C. Hecredy September 23, 1992 The staff's review of your response finds several commitments that need to be made by you and items that need to be verified, including a schedule for their implementation to bring the plant into conformance with the SBO Rule.
The enclosed SSE documents the NRC's final regulatory assessment of your proposed conformance to the SBO Rule.
Therefore, no further submittals are required.
The staff considers the two-year clock for implementation of the SBO Rule in accordance with 10 CFR 50.63(c)(4) to begin upon receipt by you of the enclosed SSE.
Therefore, you should take the necessary action to complete compliance with the SBO Rule as indicated in the staff's SE and SSE.
The documentation of the analyses and actions required to resolve the itemized concerns should be included with the other documentation to be maintained by you in support of the SBO Rule implementation for possible future NRC audits.
This completes our review under TAC No. H68548.
Sincerely,
Enclosures:
1.
Supplemental Safety Evaluation 2.
Technical Evaluation Report cc w/enclosures:
See next page DISTRIBUTION W ENCLOSURE:
Docket file.50-244 NRC L Local PDRs PDI-3 Reading Original signed by Allen R. Johnson, Project Manager Project Directorate I-3 Division of Reactor Projects I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation SVarga JCalvo AThadani TClark AJohnson FRosa WButler CBerlinger GHolahan SHitra DISTRIBUTION W 0 ENCLOSURE:
JKnight RJones CMcCracken DShum PGill WLazarus AToalston OGC ACRS (10)
JLinville RI RLobel 0FF IGE LA P
T lar DATE PH: PDI-3 AJohnson:
d 92
~
92
'D: PDI-3 WButler 5 092 92 OFFICIAL R CORD COPY Document Name:
GIH68548.LTR
C
,I Q 0 L
pi
,>l I,
Dr. Robert C. Mecredy September 23, 1992 The staff's review of your response finds several commitments that need to be made by you and items that need to be verified, including a schedule for their implementation to bring the plant into conformance with the SBO Rule.
The enclosed SSE documents the NRC's final regulatory assessment of your proposed conformance to the SBO Rule.
Therefore, no further submittals are required.
The staff considers the two-year clock for implementation of the SBO Rule in accordance with 10 CFR 50.63(c)(4) to begin upon receipt by you of the enclosed SSE.
Therefore, you should take the necessary action to complete compliance with the SBO Rule as indicated in the staff's SE and SSE.
The documentation of the analyses and actions required to resolve the itemized concerns should be included with the other documentation to be maintained by you in support of the SBO Rule implementation for possible future NRC audits.
This completes our review under TAC No. M68548.
Sincerely,
Enclosures:
1.
Supplemental Safety Evaluation 2.
Technical Evaluation Report cc w/enclosures:
See next page en R. Johnson Project Manager roject Directo ate I-3 D> 'on actor Projects I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Dr. Robert C. Hecredy R.E.
Ginna Nuclear Power Plant CC:
Thomas A. Hoslak, Senior Resident Inspector R.E.
Ginna Plant U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1503 Lake Road
- Ontario, New York 14519 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Hs.
Donna Ross Division of Policy Analysis 5 Planning New York State Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza
- Albany, New York 12223 Charlie Donaldson, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General New York Department of Law 120 Broadway New York, New York 10271 Nicholas S.
Reynolds Winston 5 Strawn 1400 L St.
N.W.
Washington, DC 20005-3502 Hs.
Thelma Wideman
- Director, Wayne County Emergency Hanagement Office Wayne County Emergency Operations Center 7370 Route 31
- Lyons, New York 14489 Hs. Hary Louise Heisenzahl Administrator, Honroe County Office of Emergency Preparedness 111 West Fall
- Road, Room ll Rochester, New York 14620