ML17258A242
"Draft Meeting" is not in the list (Request, Draft Request, Supplement, Acceptance Review, Meeting, Withholding Request, Withholding Request Acceptance, RAI, Draft RAI, Draft Response to RAI, ...) of allowed values for the "Project stage" property.
| ML17258A242 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 10/14/1981 |
| From: | Maier J ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| To: | Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17258A243 | List: |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0485, RTR-NUREG-485 NUDOCS 8110210145 | |
| Download: ML17258A242 (4) | |
Text
zzzmt
//////I/////
///////////////
EESI/
~ zzu8E asm/I
~i 'ii ~,(
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION o
89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y. 14649 JOHN E.
MA IER VICE PRESIOENT TELEPHONE ARE* COOC 710 546-2700 October 14, 1981 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
Mr. Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No.
5 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
SEP Schedule R.
E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-244
Dear Mr. Crutchfield:
Messrs. Bill Russell and Alan Wang of the SEP Branch visited the Rochester Gas and Electric engineering offices and the Ginna plant on September 23, 1981.
The purpose of this visit was to meet the RG6E management to discuss the conduct of and schedule for the SEP Integrated Assessment for Ginna.
Messrs.
Russell and Wang also toured the Ginna facility to become somewhat familiar with the plant.
The Integrated Assessment
- schedule, as published in the July 31, 1981 "Systematic Evaluation Program Status Summary Report,"
NUREG-0485, indicates that a draft SER is to be sent to ACRS and RG&E by the end of January 1982.
Although we desire and anticipate an ambitiously rapid completion of the SEP for Ginna, we do not believe that the proposed NUREG-0485 schedule can or should be met.
In order to properly integrate all outstanding SEP concerns into an effective package of modifications, sufficient time to make value-impact decisions must be allowed.
RG6E thus proposes the following SEP schedule:
In order to make use of major topic assessments still in progress or under initial review, such as containment isolation, load combinations, and tornado protection, the target date for "all topics complete" should be the end of October.
A meeting in Washington to discuss outstanding technical issues should be scheduled for the first week in November.
The SEP site visit to prepare value-impact analyses of the open items should be scheduled in Rochester for the first week in, December.
The results of that meeting would allow a draft SER to be completed by the beginning of January.
Depending on the nature of the draft assessment, in-cluding the number and magnitude of the deviations from current,
( 8II08IOI48 BIIOMI6 I PDR ADDCK 05000244 I
1 II
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORP.
October 14, 1981 Nr. Dennis Yi. Crutchfield, Chief SHEET NO.
- criteria, we expect RG&E review to require a minimum of three months.
It should be noted that it is not likely that we would provide conceptual designs for the open items within this time period.
Allowing a month for the NRC to revise the SER and issue a final SER, submittal to ACRS would be no sooner than Yiay 1982.
The proposed schedule is considered by RGEE to be extremely ambitious.
- However, we do expect to provide the proper resources to this project to meet these dates.
Of course, unexpected occurrences
, such as an "immediately" required reply to an NRC IGE Bulletin, oi similar circumstances, would impact this schedule.
Ne hope you find our proposed schedule suitable for the timely completion of the Ginna Systematic Evaluation Program.
Very truly yours, J
n E. Naier xc:
Milliam Russell, NRC Roy Zimmerman, NRC
11 C~
1