ML17257A538
| ML17257A538 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 08/13/1981 |
| From: | Maier J ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0485, RTR-NUREG-485, TASK-***, TASK-RR NUDOCS 8108190164 | |
| Download: ML17257A538 (16) | |
Text
l REGULATOR'FORMATION DISTRIBUTION S EM (RIDS)
ACCESSIOiV NBR: 8108190164 DOC ~ DATE! 81/08/13 NOTARIZED:: NO DOCKET' FACIL>:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear PlantE Unit ii Rochester>>
G 05000244'UTH, NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION
>>4lAIER<J,E.
Rochester'as L Electr .ic Corp.
RECIP ~ NAMKr RECIPIENT AFFILIATION E>>ISENHUT'ED.G ~
Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
" Advises that>>
NRC-810707 ltr criticizing poor quality of licensee. generated SEP topic assessments is not appiicab'le:
to util.For wards NRC 810630 status summary rept for SEP NURKG-0485istatus of util SEP topics as" of 810801;"
DISTRIBUTION CODE,':
>>03SS COPIES RECEIVED:L'TR
'NCL J SIZE':
g'ITLE.:
SEP Topi cs NOTES: 1 copy:SEP Sect's Ldr.
050002'44 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAMEl ACTION:
04 INTERNAL". A/D MATLRQUALii3I HYD/GKOI BR 10, NRCi PDR" 02'.
01 COPIES LTTR ENCLi' 7
1 1
2 2
1 1
1 1
REC IP'IENT ID CODE/NAME'ONT SYS A
07 tt Er 06'R ASSESS BR 11 SEP'R 12"'OPIES Lrl'TR>> ENCL>>
1 1
2 2'.,
1 1
3 3
16 16 1
1 LPDR NTIS 03 1
1 1
1 ggG R 4 'l981 gl 81 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
L>>TTR P5 ENCL
I 4
L~
~
4 r
E 4
lPiSI // CICI Zi I<'~Imrut ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION o
89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y. l4649 JOHN E.
MAIER VICf PRfSIOfNT TCLCPHONC ANc*cooc 'lie 546.2700 August, 13, 1981 Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 I A.
I',fl jjtI =
/It'~ ~ates>~
-'.S.
ICiafAg RfCVIATOa COhlhllSSON
~0
Dear Mr. Eisenhut:
This letter is in response to your Juh g
tter to all SEP licensees concerning the SEP redirects.
n that letter, it was stated that many of the licensee-generated topic assess-ments were considered of "poor quality", and that the NRC staff was concerned that subsequent assessments might also prove to be unacceptable.
Such performance would thus impair the progress of the SEP redirection.
Rochester Gas and Electric must dispute this NRC censure.
RG&E met its commitment to provide four topic assessments prior to April 30, and two additional assessments by June 30.
We are not aware of any significant deficiencies in these assessments (three have already been accepted by the NRC).
We are also not aware of any criticism of licensee-generated topic assessments provided by the staff to the licensees, prior to your July 7, 1981 letter.
We believe that the SEP redirection has been successful, and should be continued.
Rochester Gas and Electric will support the completion of the SEP for Ginna on a schedule generally consistent with the staff's planned "Integrated Assessment".
Attachment 1 to this letter, consisting of a marked up copy of the NRC's June 30, 1981 "Status Summary Report" for SEP, NUREG-0485, provides RG&E's concept of the status of the SEP topics as of August 1, 1981.
Attachment 2 provides an anticipated schedule for'topics which are now lower than status 5, or are expected to require sub-stantial time/manpower to complete.
In some cases, a completion date for these latter topics was very difficult to estimate, and should not be considered firm, since RG&E has just recently received either an NRC assessment for Ginna, or a lead-topic
/Q5 assessment for another plant. It is not possible, for most topics, to provide a reasonable response or generate an assess-ment within 30 days.
This is not surprising since in many cases it required many months of NRC contractor effort to develop the lead topic-assessment.
8108190164 810813 PDR ADOCK 05000244, PDR l
ll
,e
'b reer j<'J
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORP.
DATE August 1 3, 1 9 81 To Nr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director SHEET NO.
Any schedular differences anticipated from the NRC's "Enclosure 2" to a memo from Gus C. Lainas to J.
P. Knight, et. al., dated April 7, 1981 are explicitly noted in Attachment 2.
Very truly yours, xc:
Dennis N. Crutchfield, USNRC
r
GINNA Attachment 1
SYSTEMATIC EVALUATIOH PROGRAM BRANCH CHIEF<
W.
RUSSELL OPERATING REACTORS BRANCH CHIEF: D.
CRUTCHFIELD OPERATING REACTORS PROJECT MANAGERi R.
SHAIDER TA G GENERIC X - DELETED 0 " TOPIC HOT STARTED 1 - QUESTIONS RECEIVED FROM REVIEW BRANCH 2 - QUESTIONS SENT TO UTILITY 3 - QUESTION RESPOHSE RECEIVED BY HRC 4e-DRAFT SE RECEIVED FROM REVIEW BRANCH 4b-SAR RECEIVED FROM LICENSEE 5'. DRAFT SE SEHT TO UTILITY 6 - SE RESPOHSE RECEIVED BY NRC 7
TOPIC COMPLETE FACILITY> GINHA LICENSEE:
ROCHESTER GAS 4
ELECTRIC REGION/LOCATION) 15 MILES NORTH EAST OF ROCHESTERi HY.
DOCKET HO.:
05000244 POWER CAPACITY: 1520(THERMAL) 0490(ELECTRICAL)
WEST.
A/E FIRM ~ GIL.
II-1 A.
II-1 B.
II-1 C.
II-2 A.
II-2 B.
II-2 C.
II-2 D.
II-3 A.
II"3 B.;
II-3 B.
1.
II-3 C.
II-4 II"4 A.
II-4 B.
II-4 C.
II-4 D.
II-4 E.
II-4 F.
III-1 III-2 2(Sys) 6(Elec)
TOPIC HO.
STATUS REMARKS NRC to RGE JANl'- 7e Ro.c
~i@84 7' /3 NRC to RGE RGE to NRC NRC to RGE A'66 A W~C gift 4$~~a
~~a w~ ~~c-
~~i NRC to RGE HRC to RGE
~g C To JpCr&
NRC to RGE ro PA'4 HRC to RGE g+g ~ +AC NRC to RGE RGE to HRC pgC Sl'~
Vid/t'5/07/8 1
gag~+ 40/g 05/07/8 1
04@4.0@$ 4 ~//o4 44c-'N~~PA/
a~~> ~///J>/
~q~~ W/Z/e/
06/08/81 06/08/81 y/s o//e/'
1/16/7 9 C/~os/.
0 1/13/8 1
0 1/23/8 1
~/~~ger RGE to NRC 04/15/81 REG to NRC 01/19/81
GINNA TOPIC HO.
STATUS III-3 A.
6 III-3 B.
X III-3 C.
III-0 A.
6a III"0 B.
G III-6 C.
0 III-0 D, 44a 7 III-5 A.
4-b III-5 B.
6 III-6 III-7 A.
G III-7 B.
3 III-7 C.
m Co III-7 D.
III-8 A.
III-8 B.
III-8 C.
III-8 D.
IIEI-9 III-10 A.
RENARKS RGE to NRC HRC to RGE HRC to RGE 1IRC m RGa RGE to HRC RGE to NRC NRC to RGE RGE to HRC NRC to RGE NRC to RGE NRC to RGE RGE to NRC HRC to RGE NRC to RGE RGE to NRC 05/0 1/81 12/3 1/80 05/07/8 1
~~ 7/41JB1
~~~ 8/4/8 I 08/07/80 ozca~ >/~'~
05/07/8 1
1 1/1'/79
~~~ /l~
05/08/80 05/07/8'1 10/0 1/80 12/07/79 05/07/81 05/07/8 1
~~ Y/aggl IV-3 V-1 V-2 V-3 V-5 V-6 V-7 V-9 V-10 A.
V" 10 B.
V-11 A.
V"11 B.
7 7(Sys) 7(Elec)
TOPIC HO.
STATUS III-10 B.
III-10 C.
III-11 III-12 IV-1 A.
IV-2 REMARKS NRC to RGE HRC to RGE NRC to RGE HRC to RGE HRC.to RGE NRC to RGE HRC to RGE HRC to RGE HRC to RGE NRC to RGE HRC to RGE HRC to RGE HRC to RGE HRC to RGE HRC to RGE HRC to RGE NRC to RGE RGo'~ <a t4PA~~M NRC to RGE glO SK-~?GF~ pn c.
06/22/8 1
.1 1/16/79 05/07/8 1
05/07/8 1
05/29/79 05/26/8 1
05/07/8'I 05/07/81 1 1/16/7 9 05/07/8 1
05/07/8 1
~~r/~~
03/05/80 05/07/8 1
05/07/8 1
11/16/79 02/02/79
~~@->/"/'6'i I
~~//~>//al
~~~6/~/e Ay/ >p (2-12)
GINNA VI-0 VI-5 VI-6 VI-7 A.
1.
VI-7 A. 2.
VI-7 A. 3.
VI-7 A.
VI-7 B.
VI-7 C.
VI-7 C.
1.
VI-7 C. 2.
VI"7 C. 3.
~ 4'ys) 7(Elec)
TOPIC HOc STATUS V-12 A.
V-13 VI-1 VI-2 A ~
VI-2 B.
VI-2 C.
VI-2 D.
VI-3 REMARKS NRC o
GE HRC to RGE yg(. m R~<
HRC to RGE HRC to RGE NRC to RGE pic To RN4 HRC to RGE HRC to RGE NRC to RGE HRC to RGE NRC to RGE HRC to RGE HRC to RGE HRC to RGE NRC to RGE gal> ~ ~ac 4RC-~Wr HRC to RGE HRC to RGE 11/16/
9 05/07/8 1
i/a 6/gl 05/07/8 1
05/07/8 1
1 1/16/79 z/~~//8/
0 1/12/8 1
05/07/8 1
05/06/8 1
" 02/20/81 08/17/78 12/15/80 05/07/8 1
02/27/8 1
02/20/8 1
//4/S/
02/20/8 1
1 1/16/7 9 VII-3 VII-0 VII-5 VII-6 VII-7 VIII-1 A.
VIII-2 VIII-3 A.
VIII-3 B.
VIII-0 7(sys) 7(Elec)
X TOPIC NO.
STATUS VI-7 D.
VI-7 E.
VI-7 F.
VI-8 VI-9 VI-10 A.
VI-10 B.
VII-1 A.
VII-1 B..
VI'I-2 RENARKS N
C to RGE HRC to RGE HRC to RGE HRC to RGE HRC to RGE HRC to RGE NRC to RGE RGE to HRC NRC to RGE HRC to RGE HRC to RGE NRC to RGE NRC to RGE HRC to RGE NRC to RGE NRC to RGE HRC to RGE gGN te 6'AC 4%4-4w)-ROB HRC to RGE RGE to NRC 08/17/78 05/07/8 1
06/2%/8 1
05/07/81 1 1/16/79 12/15/80 11/16/79 06/26/8 1
08/17/? 8 06/12/8 1
<~~m d Ja~ib 06/2%/81 05/07/8 1
05/07/8 1
06/20/8 1
11/16/79 03/26/81 06/2%/8 1 06/0 9/8 1 (2-13)
GINNA TOPIC NO.
STATUS RENARKS TOPIC NO.
STATUS REMARKS d
To hlgC.
IX-1 IX-2 lX-3 IX-I IX-5 IX-6 XI-1 XI-2 XIII-'1 XIII-2 XV-1 XV-2 XV-3 XV-0 XV-5 XY-6 XV-7 XV"'8 XV-9 4a-(a
/
6 ta MSys)
Qe(Doses)
NRC to RGE pgc ro Rud pg.d 70 gl'5Z7 HRC to RGE HRC to RGE HRC to RGE HRC to RGE HRC to RGE NRC to RGE ggd'aa PaC Rgd W
NRC 4A%-ko-R(rE Rbd ve NR4 Rgb 7Q +JCc N~~~
~gg ~ Agc gCd 7o NRC
~pc 06/ 09/81 05/07/81
~l >/>
s/r./s/
g/u 9/r8'/'5/07/8 1
05/07/8 1
05/07/8'1 05/07/8 1
05/07/8 1
03/Zd/81 aaC:~ 8/1'l<<
~~ e/e/8/
S/<j /
aaaaaaaa a/a/I I
~~e/4j
~~aa aa<//
XV 10 XV-11 XV-12 XV-13 XV-14 XV-15 XV-16 XV-17 XV-18 XV 19 XV-20 XV-21 XV-ZZ XV-23 XV-Zc4 XVI XVII 4 4C Sys) 6a(DOses)
NRC. to. RGE 7o Hcc HRC to RGE gdd'O rVRC 4RK~M%6 pl/'C.
NRC to ROE HRC to RGE HRC to, RGE HRC to RGE NRC to RGE HRC to RGE RGE
%e HRC gg.g
%e(Doses),
X HRC to RGE a
SMSys) p'ge. W A'<~
Ca(Doses) 8 e/
1,0/0 S/8,0
~~ s/</s/
11/ %6/79 04/18/80
~~
sP~/'3/1 1/80 7/u W 8/'5/07/8 1
05/07/8 1
05/Q,l/8 1, 05/07/8 1
1 1/05/80 08/17/78
Attachment 2
SEP Topic Schedule This topic schedule does not include topics which are re-solved, or for which resolution is imminent.
II-2.A Severe Weather Phenomena III-2 Wind and Tornado Loadings III-4.A Tornado Missiles 2.
The completion of these three interrelated topics depends primarily on the completion of NRC contractor work being done on Topic III-2 by Franklin Research Center (FRC).
RG&E cannot provide a schedule for responding to these topics until we have had an opportunity to review the III-2 assessment.
We will provide a schedule for resolution of this topic within 30 days of the receipt of that assessment.
II-3.A, II-3.B, II-3.B.1, II-3.C, III-3.A Hydrology RGGE has committed to provide a PhIP/PMF study in early August.
This will be completed.
The NRC has determined that an NRC contractor evaluation of the Ginna revetment is required.
This has not yet been scheduled.
No further work can be done until this evaluation is made by the NRC.
3.
III-1 Classification RGGE is awaiting NRC contractor evaluation, originally scheduled to be completed 6/30/81.
4.
III-3.C ISI of Water Control Structures RG6E will develop a topic assessment within 30 days of receipt of a lead topic assessment (not yet received).
5.
III-4.C Internally-Generated Missiles The lead topic assessment, for Palisades, was received very
- recently, on August 3, 1981.
RGGE cannot provide a schedule until we have had a chance to review this assessment in detail.'owever, it "appears that, a substantial length of ti'me, possibly in excess of 90 days, wi;1'1 be required to prepare
'an assessment
'for Ginna.
6.
III-5.A High Energy Line Break Inside Containment A schedule for resolution of this topic, which requires substantial analysis, is provided in an August 6,
1981 letter from RG&E (Maier) to NRC (Crutchfield).
11 S
pI
)
11 u
J V
2 u
7.
III-6 Seismic Considerations RG6E schedules were submitted in a March 23, 1981 letter from RG&E (Maier) to NRC (Crutchfield).
8.
III-7.B Load Combinations This topic is being performed by an NRC contractor, and is scheduled for completion by August 30, 1981.
9.
VI-1 Organic Materials An evaluation of this topic in response to the NRC's January 26, 1981 questions is expected by September 16, 1981.
10.
VI-2.D Mass and Energy Release VI-3 Containment Heat Removal These two interrelated topics are being performed by NRC contractor, with work originally scheduled to be completed by June 30, 1981.
Because of the obvious difficulty of these topic reviews, RG6E cannot provide a schedule for completion until we have reviewed the contractor results.
RGGE will provide a schedule for resolution of these topics within 30 days of receipt of the topic assessments.
ll.
VI-4 Containment Isolation (systems)
This very extensive NRC assessment received August 3,
- 1981, will require at least a
90 day period to provide a response.
,12.
VI-7.B ESF Switchover RGSE will respond to NRC questions regarding instrumentation by August 18, 1981. If additional detailed hydraulic analysis is required, a completion date of December 1,
1981 is anticipated.
13.
IX-1 Fuel Storage RGSE submitted information on this subject in a June 9,
1981
- letter, and will await an NRC response prior to planning additional effort.
14.
IX-5 Ventilation This work is being performed by NRC contractor.
A site visit to Ginna by NRC/FRC was conducted the week of July 27, 1981.
~,
1 tt I
II
15.
XV Design Basis Events RGBE expects to respond to all DBE assessments within 30 days of receipt.
Response
to the NRC letter dated June 27, 1981 which assessed a number of the DBEs was pro-vided by letter dated August 4, 1981 from RGGE.